Home Energy and Environment Conference Call: Salazar and Browner Discuss Obama Energy Plan

Conference Call: Salazar and Browner Discuss Obama Energy Plan

402
8
SHARE

I just got off a conference call with Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar and Carol Browner, Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, the subject of which was “our nation’s energy security and the Administration’s efforts to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, create jobs, and lead the way towards a clean energy economy.”  Here are a few highlights, with particular focus on Virginia. {Also, click here for a press release on the “Comprehensive Strategy for Offshore Oil and Gas Development and Exploration”}

*Browner emphasized that this is a comprehensive energy strategy to reduce dependence on foreign oil and create a clean energy economy. It includes fuel efficient cars, advanced biofuels, nuclear power, energy efficiency, “greening” the federal vehicle fleet, efforts by the Defense Department “to enhance energy security and independence and reduce harmful emissions, including encouraging the development and use of domestically produced advanced biofuels,” and offshore oil drilling.

*Browner emphasized that we “can’t drill our way to energy independence.”

*Salazar stressed that the Obama administration’s energy plan is “balanced” between development and conservation.  He emphasized that development needs to be in the right places with the right information. He said we need a “cautious approach” to Arctic development.

*Salazar also pointed out that “we’ll never drill our way to energy independence.” He noted that there’s a “relatively minor amount” of oil in the Outer Continental Shelf, definitely not a “panacea.”  He added that there are perhaps 100 million barrels in the eastern Gulf of Mexico.

*Browner said that the automobile fuel economy rules to be announced tomorrow will save “1.8 billion barrels of oil over the life of the program.”

*Browner emphasized that Congress needs to pass “comprehensive energy legislation.”

*Salazar said that the Arctic is a “special place,” that we need to move forward with the science and find out what’s there.

*With regard to Virginia, Salazar said that the plan is to move forward with the process for lease sales, with a decision possible by late 2011/early 2012. A decision will be made after evaluation of environmental issues and also potential conflicts with military training needs.

*In response to a question by the Virginian-Pilot, Salazar said that we know very little about oil resources in the Atlantic, that the information is 30 years old, and that we “owe it to the American people” to make decisions based on good information.

*On the issue of revenue sharing with states, Salazar said this new proposal didn’t specifically address that issue and that revenue sharing is covered under existing law.  According to Salazar, there are “no revenue sharing provisions except for limited exceptions.” Browner added that revenue sharing is part of the discussions going on in the Senate, including with respect to the Kerry/Lieberman/Graham efforts.

*Salazar stressed the importance of offshore wind, stating that the quality of the wind resources off the east coast is very high, and that transmission issues aren’t significant compared to many other locations. Salazar added that we need to develop energy from many sources, and that he doesn’t see offshore wind and oil development as being “in conflict” with one another.

  • Hopeful in NJ

    I have to say I’ve been having trouble seeing this as any part of a comprehensive plan instead of throwing in the towel. Everything Obama in his speech mentioned other than the military was from early last year.

  • Elaine in Roanoke

    Thanks so much for this post. From the way it was first reported, it appeared to be an absolute done deal.

    “Virginia, Salazar said that the plan is to move forward with the process for lease sales, with a decision possible by late 2011/early 2012. A decision will be made after evaluation of environmental issues and also potential conflicts with military training needs.”

    That’s much more reasonable than the way NPR reported it.  

  • It’s not really an issue if conflict between types if energy, but a question of where we, as a country, are putting our priorities, in both the short term and the long term. I have a hard time seeing people here talk about the long term- it still seems mostly short term and mostly oil based. Sigh.  

  • kindler

    Lowell, you made the key point for me in your last diary on this issue — that Obama appears to have made a massive concession to the Repubs while appearing to get nothing in return.  That hasn’t been considered good policy or good politics since the days of ol’ Neville Chamberlain…  

    • TomPaine

      None!

    • I’m willing to be convinced that this is something good, but right now, I still can’t see it.  Right now, I see this as a pure “win” for McDonnell (even though there may be no oil at all and Virginia may never see a dime of the money even if there is) and very little for anyone else.