Home National Politics Terrorists Can Buy Guns Say Republicans

Terrorists Can Buy Guns Say Republicans

290
9
SHARE

Anyone on the FBI terrorist watch list can be prevented from getting on an airplane, but he definitely can buy a gun, even an AK-47 assault weapon, without restraint say Congressional Republicans, according to a column by Gail Collins in today’s New York Times, where she says “There seems to be a strong sentiment in Congress that the only constitutional right suspected terrorists have is the right to bear arms.” She quotes  Senator Lindsey Graham (SC, R), who spoke in opposition to a bill offered by Senator Frank Lutenberg (NJ, D) which would allow the government to stop gun sales to people on the watch list, just as it can already do to people with felony convictions.  

Senator Graham’s Republican logic runs as follows: We can prevent terrorists from getting on airplanes because “when the founders sat down and wrote the Constitution, they didn’t consider flying,”but when it comes to keeping people on the terrorist watch list from buying guns, well, “I want to slow down and think about this,” Graham said, pointing out that “Some of the people pushing this idea are also pushing the idea of banning handguns. I don’t think banning handguns makes me safer.” What he really means, is: Don’t mess with guns or the National Rifle Association will skin my, uh, hindquarters, but airplanes are not mentioned in the Second Amendment, so we can restrict them. Writes Collins about Congress people, “….the subject of guns makes them act like a paranoid mother ferret protecting her litter.”

So we have the spectacle of Congressional Republicans complaining about reading his Miranda rights to Faisal Shahzad,  the Times Square would-be bomber, and Republican talk show pundits howling to torture Shahzad and strip him of his citizenship—- but at the same time defending his right to have bought a weapon and munitions in order to carry out his car bomb effort. These are the very same people who are okay with the Patriot Act and data-mining of private communications, and okay with no-warrant wiretaps, and even with holding suspects forever without trial at Gitmo….  Behold the Republican Fungible Bill of Rights.

Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York, himself pleaded for passage of Lautenberg’s bill, to no avail, although the Senators praised him for New York’s frustrating the Times Square bomber. In fact, the system worked very well, something that seems to irritate Republicans no end, since they are always looking for an excuse to accuse President Obama and Democrats of being soft on terrorism and namby-pamby soft-heart-soft-heads when Democrats insist on following the American legal system, and actually living the Constitution including the Bill of Rights when dealing with terrorists and suspected terrorists. How they dislike hearing that the system really does work—– not only did an smart civilian T-shirt vendor (who, I believe, was actually a Muslim himself) alert police to the smoking SUV, the security team connected the dots and captured the alleged bomber, but the alleged bomber himself, after being read his Miranda rights, is now talking with the FBI without being tortured. All this is upsetting to authoritarian-minded Republicans. Good grief, the system works!

Imagine how the Republicans would deal with a Democratic policy which blatantly said, “Terrorists are explicitly allowed to purchase however many weapons and munitions they want to because it is their sacred Second Amendment Right.” We’d never hear the end of it on Fox News, at rallies, probably even in sermons on Sunday, asking why Democrats hate America.”Be afraid, be very afraid of Democrats!”

  • Teddy Goodson

    is what Shahzad is reported to have said to the FBI when they collared him; he was already on the aircraft. Why would he say that? Did he purposely create a car bomb that would not explode? Where are his wife and child: hostages in the hands of the Taliban? in hiding? On some level, did he actually want to be caught? Or, is he only a plant? (by whom?) He obviously had plenty of confidence in the American system, sure he would not be trotured, no matter what. Hmm. Loose ends, so criticism of the caper at this time is a little inappropriate, perhaps…. but I just cannot get over the Republicans’ mixed and contradictory attitudes on terrorism

  • The Donkey

    Shahzad was caught — this much is true. I suppose we can thank the terrorist “no fly” list for that.

    But if Shahzad was competent, the bomb would have exploded, and taken the heroic T-Shirt vendors with it.

    What seems to have “worked” to keep the people of Times Square safe is the US’s international campaign against terrorists: it kept the Taliban so off balance that they could not manage to put Shahzad through an effective course on how to murder effectively — even though he targeted the softest of targets.

    We need to keep taking the fight to the enemy, as we have been. Taking away our own rights, be they Second or Fifth Amendment rights, is not likely to make us more secure, as it detracts from what makes the US unique among nations.

  • jack

    Rights cannot be taken away without due process of law.  Do you disagree?