Home Virginia Politics Defective Chinese Drywall and No Autism Protection Are “Pro Business”?

Defective Chinese Drywall and No Autism Protection Are “Pro Business”?


I received the following email from a Virginia politico who prefers to remain anonymous, but asked me to post this. I have done so, with a few minor edits for grammar, punctuation, and to protect his or her identity. Needless to say, I strongly agree with what’s written here about the group known as Virginia FREE (“FREE” stands for “Foundation for Research and Economic Education”).  For an idea how influential and powerful this group is, click here to read about how “more than a third (35.9%) of all campaign dollars raised by incumbent state legislators in the 2007 cycle came from VAFREE members.”  In contrast, “This compares to 3% from the trial lawyers and 1% from organized labor.” That’s right, the bogeymen of “trial lawyers” and “unions” accounted for a combined 4% of Virginia campaign dollars in 2007, compared to 36% – 9 times that amount – from Virginia FREE. Just keep that in mind as you read the following, most excellent, rant. Also keep it in mind as you peruse Virginia FREE’s annual rankings of legislators. Actually, given the following information, it might make a lot more sense to flip those rankings upside down.

Virginia FREE purports to advocate for business, for having a strong business climate for Virginia. Every year, after the General Assembly session, they issue a scorecard. This year, I was appalled to note that they included bills such as mandatory autism insurance coverage (which they opposed and it failed), prohibiting insurers from canceling those with Chinese drywall (which they opposed and it failed) and several environmental bills including a renewable energy portfolio standard and quantifiable measures of greenhouse gases to be included in any transportation plan (which they opposed and the bills failed).

Virginia FREE also, of course, opposed a bill that would have allowed non-violent criminals to have their records expunged after a certain number of years and under certain conditions. Here is the link to their scorecard (the bills they used to compile it are in Appendix B.)

I think this is outrageous and they ought to be called on it. It is ridiculous to think that having dirty air and water, insufficient (or non-existent) coverage for disabled children create a good and strong business climate. I would hope that we believe that Virginians are fairer and smarter than that and recognize the value of a good environment.

It is really sad that Virginia FREE sees disparaging the environment as the best business climate. To the contrary, of course, a cleaner, more energy efficient Virginia is actually better for business and job creation. Moreover, creating an environmentally improved Virginia will also lead to green jobs. Certainly, allowing autistic children to receive therapy so they can grow up to be productive constructive citizens (who can be part of a skilled workforce and pay their fair share instead of being a cost to the state) ought to be seen as a worthwhile investment (not to mention basic human decency). Part of having a successful business climate, it would seem to me, is having good quality of life so that employees want to be here and so you can attract a skilled workforce. All the things they have opposed ignore that and, frankly, are contrary to that.

I am furious that Virginia FREE can get away with this. I am also furious that the “mainstream media” just publishes the scores and describe Virginia FREE as a “pro-business” group. So, feel free (bad pun) to ignore this, but I thought you and your readers might feel some of the same righteous indignation that I do.

  • Dan Sullivan

    There’s your competition in the marketplace of ideas.

  • Elaine in Roanoke

    Back in 2003-2004, many of us were motivated by Howard Dean saying, “I want my country back.” (Even the Tea Baggers use that mantra today, whatever their motives might be.) Sadly, we the people have never “had” the country. The influence of the moneyed elite has been present and firmly in control  since the revolution we celebrated yesterday. Every time that reformers have attempted to change politics in this nation, it hasn’t taken the elite – and a Supreme Court controlled by the elite -long to learn how to circumvent whatever has been tried.

    I have come to the conclusion that change in our democracy rests on our ability to pass two reforms: public financing of elections and term limits on officeholders.

    Both require constitutional changes. I am not optimistic about either.

  • Teddy Goodson

    at the memership in FREE as compared to that of the Chamber of Commerce. Both groups have turned virulently anti-labor, anti-environment, anti-Democrat, anti-Obama. When FREE first began it did not seem to be so extreme, it wanted, as I recall, more education and better transportation, both of which strike me as a higher order of pro-business. Alas for common sense.