What I want to know is, when Sen. Warner talks about not taking anything “off the table,” does that count the Bush tax cuts, which cost about $4 TRILLION a decade, and which Congress just voted a couple months ago to extend for two more years? If so, then I’m interested in what Warner’s doing. If not, then I’m not. How about you?
P.S. When Sen. Chambliss (ack, can barely even type that scumbag’s name!) says he’s never voted for a tax increase and doesn’t plan to do so, doesn’t that take the Bush tax cuts off the “table?”