No Virginia, Demography Is Not Destiny

    290
    5
    SHARE

    Cross-posted at Virginia’s newest political blog, The Real Crystal Ball

    Today I am launching my new political blog, The Real Crystal Ball. A big reason for this blog is to clear the air following the reelection of President Barack Obama and his second victory in the Old Dominion. Gleeful Virginia Democrats looking ahead to Terry McAuliffe’s ascension to the title of “His Excellency” are in danger of having the Governor’s Mansion pulled away from them at the last second, like Charlie Brown trusting Lucy just one more time to hold the ball. In this case the role of Lucy is being played by the Commonwealth’s ever-changing electorate, which has jerked back and forth between Democrats and Republicans so many times in the last eight years political pundits are developing whiplash. Today’s lesson is to clear up the belief that demography is destiny in the Old Dominion.

    Virginia, Colorado, Florida, Nevada and Ohio are special states; they are the only five states that voted twice for President George W. Bush and then voted twice for President Barack Obama. That may be the only thing the states have in common. The growth in Hispanic voters in both Florida and Nevada is setting off alarms in central Republican HQ, where the big questions are how soon can Marco Rubio run for President and how many Rubio clones can be produced before then. But Virginia, for all of its diversity from Annandale to Petersburg, is not a state the Republicans need to worry about slipping away to the blue side because of strong minority growth.

    The liberal Center for American Progress has conducted an analysis of changes in the electorate across several states, including Virginia. They only focus on the growth from more eligible Latino voters in 2016, trying to drive the narrative that a quick immigration reform bill is the best road back to the White House for Republicans. But when Micah Cohen at the New York Times ran the numbers it turns out that it doesn’t do much for increasing Obama’s margin in Virginia compared to other states with fast growing Latino populations like Florida and Nevada.

    In a close state squeezing out 1% more can be a big deal, but in a close state there’s always more than one way to skin a cat. Virginia, Colorado, and Iowa are all states where Mitt Romney, despite a historic level of support from white voters, failed to match President George W. Bush’s 2004 performance among white voters. Romney ran 6% behind Bush in Colorado, 3% behind Bush in Iowa, and a whopping 8% behind Bush in Virginia … among white voters.

    Virginia Democrats are going to get no help in the electoral battles ahead from demographic changes. It’s even possible that as the nation becomes more racially and ethnically diverse, more white voters could start leaning Republican. Imagine that, white voters in the Commonwealth returning to the Grand Old Party to turn the state red again. Old Virginny is dead? Long live Old Virginny. Virginia Republicans are better off figuring out the motives of the white Bush voters who backed Obama in 2008 and 2012 than worrying about minority growth in Virginia. Besides, a number of Republicans in Richmond have already shown they know how to work with Virginia’s minority communities.  

    • Paba

      This is exactly what I’ve been thinking. We are assuming that the younger portion of the Obama coalition won’t change its voting habits. I mean, we’ve only seen young voters grow from idealists to conservatives and in turn create the Reagan Revolution in recent decades, right? Come on people.

      The Democrats can’t fall into that trap of thinking that coalitions last so long past the careers of those who lead them. Don’t forget how hard the New Deal Coalition fell in the 1980s, especially in 1984.

      Even on social issues, we’ve seen a generation go from backing Civil Rights to backing a Reagan Coalition including men like Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms, who eventually shut up just long enough about Civil Rights to allow the GOP to get away with dog whistle politics just enough while emphasizing fighting commies and slashing taxes. The GOP of the future won’t always be emphasizing its anti-LGBT stances. They may not be champions for these causes, but they very well may get away with sweeping it under the rug and focusing on economic and defense issues, like the Reagan Coalition.

      The worst mistake the Democratic Party in Virginia can make is neglecting areas that are largely white working or middle class in hopes that they can rely on the Obama Coalition forever. Losing those voters is how we got Reagan, and those voters are much more reliable voters than young people (who may go GOP later in life) or immigrant and minority communities (which still have very low turnout rates in non-Presidential years, and you need to win in the odd years if you ever want to fix your schools, roads, and other state-run necessities).