This dolt also says, “for the people to say the science is decided on, this is just really arrogant, to be honest with you.” Hello corporate media, are you ever going to call out leading 2016 Republican candidates for this insanity (and yes, it is bat**** crazy stuff), or are you going to keep harping on the Clintons’ charity, which does great work and which has received donations from all kinds of people from all across the political spectrum?
On a related note, I saw this morning in The Hill – in a supposedly “straight news” article no less – the offhand comment by the “reporter” that “In a general election, some of Sanders’s views might doom him.” Uhhhhh….what “views” does Sanders hold, exactly – strengthening America’s social safety net? protecting the environment? – that would “doom him” in a general election, and how is this factual information to put into a news article. More to the point, how is it that the “views” of Republicans like Jeb Bush, such as denying/minimizing climate science or calling it “arrogant” for climate scientists to come to scientific conclusions about their reams of data, don’t “doom” them? But holding totally mainstream, majority views like Bernie Sanders does (I challenge you to find an issue where he’s out of the mainstream) “dooms” him? WTF?