Monday, May 21, 2018
Home Authors Posts by kindler

kindler

196 POSTS 1293 COMMENTS

The People Who Taught You to Hate Hillary, Part I: Judicial Watch

Cross-posted at Daily Kos “Untrustworthy Hillary” is a media construct relentlessly pushed by people who gain politically from it.  Regardless of where you stand on...

Dominion Files Brief in Favor of EPA Clean Power Plan

Here at Blue Virginia, we never hesitate to blast Dominion, or the politicians they keep in their air-conditioned kennels, for all these folks do...

Time for Hillary’s Silent Majority to Speak Up

By Kindler  Cross-posted at Daily Kos Donald Trump has revived an old Nixonian term in claiming that his supporters constitute a “silent majority”.  Of course,...

How Trump Hacked the Media – And How We Can Hack His Hack

by Kindler  Often the winner of the game is not the most talented player but the one who truly masters the rules. For all the endless...

GOP: Party of Whiners

By Kindler Back in the day, Republicans aimed to be as macho as Clint Eastwood – from his “make my day” era, that is, not...
Car-Title-Loans-Choices.jpg

Want to motivate VA Dems to vote? Dump Dick “TitleMax” Saslaw as Leader.

Hey, I just thought of a great way for Virginia Democrats to motivate the base to turn out and vote for a Democratic Senate.  It occurred to me as I was listening to the first in a series of reports  by Michael Pope on WAMU radio on the rip-off artists known as "car-title lenders."

After discussing how one poor victim took out a loan for $2,600 and ended up paying a whopping $5,515, Pope then shifts to a staunch defender of the industry:

"It's not predatory," says Senate Democratic Leader Dick Saslaw, who has taken about $37,000 from TitleMax in the last decade. He says if people like Waverly didn't have access to businesses like TitleMax, they would find other ways to get the money.

"Well they borrow it on the street," he says. "Borrow $100 on Monday, pay back $200 on Friday, 10,000 percent APR. That's where they were borrowing money. And if they didn't pay it back they got the hell beat out of them and they still had to pay it back."

The report then cites the Center for Responsible Lending, which indicates no evidence of such a black market for loans, but reports that car-title lenders in 21 states are "costing borrowers about $3.6 billion each year in interest on $1.6 billion in loans."

In other words, Sen. Saslaw is doing here precisely what we see conservatives on Fox do every single day: make an utterly ridiculous argument, contrary to all known facts - but in concert with his donors' economic interests.  

Car-Title-Loans-Choices.jpg

Want to motivate VA Dems to vote? Dump Dick “TitleMax” Saslaw as Leader.

Hey, I just thought of a great way for Virginia Democrats to motivate the base to turn out and vote for a Democratic Senate.  It occurred to me as I was listening to the first in a series of reports  by Michael Pope on WAMU radio on the rip-off artists known as "car-title lenders."

After discussing how one poor victim took out a loan for $2,600 and ended up paying a whopping $5,515, Pope then shifts to a staunch defender of the industry:

"It's not predatory," says Senate Democratic Leader Dick Saslaw, who has taken about $37,000 from TitleMax in the last decade. He says if people like Waverly didn't have access to businesses like TitleMax, they would find other ways to get the money.

"Well they borrow it on the street," he says. "Borrow $100 on Monday, pay back $200 on Friday, 10,000 percent APR. That's where they were borrowing money. And if they didn't pay it back they got the hell beat out of them and they still had to pay it back."

The report then cites the Center for Responsible Lending, which indicates no evidence of such a black market for loans, but reports that car-title lenders in 21 states are "costing borrowers about $3.6 billion each year in interest on $1.6 billion in loans."

In other words, Sen. Saslaw is doing here precisely what we see conservatives on Fox do every single day: make an utterly ridiculous argument, contrary to all known facts - but in concert with his donors' economic interests.  

The WaPo Jumps the Shark on Climate Change Reporting

Cross-posted at Daily Kos

Just when you thought the media might be ready to report the facts on climate change - about which 99.9% of scientists who've studied the issue agree - we're cursed with another story in the Washington Post that gets it very, very wrong: "How climate-change doubters lost a papal fight".

This piece starts with the story of Philippe de Larminat, a "French doubter who authored a book arguing that solar activity - not greenhouse gases - was driving global warming," who - sacre bleu! - is denied an audience with Pope Francis before the issuance of the Pope's historic encyclical.  The first problem here is that we are never given any information about de Larminat's scientific credentials - or indeed whether he has any.  (Per LinkedIn, it appears that he has a bachelor's in mechanical engineering and a doctorate in "the sciences," dating from the sixties and seventies. Otherwise, he's mostly a black hole on the Internet.)

There are millions of scientists around the world, and tens of thousands in the climate field.  Why focus on this one?  What are his contributions to the field?

The Post story then brings up the egregious Heartland Institute, which the writers generously describe as "a free-market group that serves as a hub of skepticism regarding the science of human-caused global warming."  They give no background on Heartland, such as its history of being paid by tobacco companies to deny the science of their products causing cancer, or the hundreds of thousands of dollars it has received from the Koch brothers to support their oil investments with climate denial, or their infamous billboard campaign comparing climate scientists to figures like the Unabomber.  

vL6tQ-O6_400x400.jpg

In Fairfax’s Mason District, Mysterious Newcomer vs. Reliable Incumbent

Have mercy on my mailbox!  It has in recent weeks been carpet-bombed by slick flyers, most of them from a young lady named Jessica Swanson -  also known as "who?"  

Well, a few things about her are clear - she badly wants Mason District Supervisor Penny Gross's job and is willing to say lots of nasty things about Gross to win it. And she clearly has a ton of money and political consultant resources to back up that desire. Hence the mystery...

But that mystery has been clearing up lately, as Gross' team has finally begun to fight fire with fire and send out its own flyers clarifying where Swanson got that cash - a record $87,221 of it from an organization known as Leadership for Educational Equity (LEE).  LEE is described in an American Prospect article as a sort of PAC for the Teach for America / school privatization crowd.  

Now, I don't focus much on education issues and wouldn't be the best person to comment on the battles over how best to save our schools.  But if this is Ms. Swanson's agenda, she is not even mentioning it - all she talks about in regard to education is upping the county schools budget (and blaming Gross for cutting it).  

For that matter, despite her withering criticisms of the incumbent, she proposes very little in the way of substantive policy changes.  Most of the issues page on her website consists of bland statements like "I believe in listening to the community's input in a real way."  After attacking Gross for taking contributions from developers - the main source of campaign funds for nearly every local official - Swanson makes no pledge to refrain from such donors herself.  

Must Virginia Play the Victim of EPA’s Clean Power Plan Rule?

Dominion, and the Virginia politicians who worship it, have an explanation for their support of the utility's bill to deregulate itself.  Our state, they say, is being unfairly targeted by EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan rule because Virginia was assigned higher carbon dioxide reduction targets than some neighboring states.  

It's one of those claims that, while superficially true, conceals many more important truths - like the following three:

1) The EPA rule is still only a proposal.  Legally speaking, there is no EPA rule yet, so why on Earth would we need to defend ourselves against something the details of which are almost certain to change?  

The way Federal regulatory processes work, the proposal goes out for comment, EPA has to review and respond to every comment and revise the final rule accordingly.  And considering that EPA received over 2 million comments, nobody knows what the heck the final rule will look like.  Much of the current bellyaching, then, is really about working the referee - to get EPA to change the final rule, rather than responding in any serious way to it.  

2) Numerous states have more aggressive proposed goals than Virginia - yet the ones with the lowest goals are complaining the most. The Georgetown Climate Center has superb resources on EPA's Clean Power Plan, including a factsheet showing all the state CO2 goals and how they were derived.  Bottom line per this analysis of the proposal is that 15 states have percentage CO2 reductions that are either more stringent than or equal to Virginia's.  So no, we are not the scapegoat here.

But here's the funny part - some of the states with the toughest goals proposed by EPA, like Oregon, Washington and California, are among those who've written letters to EPA in support of the plan. Meanwhile, some of the states with the weakest proposed goals, like Alabama, Wyoming and Kentucky, are among those suing EPA to stop the rule.

- Blue Virginia Sponsor -







Daily News Briefings

Popular This Week