Home | Virginia
Politics
| National
Politics
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Should Democrats Move Their Convention Out of North Carolina?
No, I agree with the anti-gay-marriage amendment
No, lots of states have these amendments
No, it's too late to change
No, we want to win North Carolina this November
Yes, we need to take a stand against bigotry
Yes, NC's amendment is particularly heinous
Yes, we're not going to win NC anyway
Yes for many reasons

Results

Weather

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Virginia Blogs
All Politics is Local
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Coarse Cracked Corn
Crew of 42
DemRulz
Dixie Pig
Equality Loudoun
The Fix (WaPo)
Greater Greater Washington
The Green Miles
Leaving My Marc
Leesburg Tomorrow
Loudoun Progress
Moonhowlings
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Off K Street
Old Dominion Blogs
Ox Road South Blog
Renaissance Ruminations
Richmonder
Richmond Sunlight
RTD VA Politics blog
Roanoke Times blog
Shad Plank
SlantBlog
Too Conservative
True Adventures of the Doorbell Queen
VB Dems
Virginia Education Report
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll

Progressive Legal Directory www.criminallawyervirginia.net
www.virginia-duilawyers.com
www.virginia-personalinjurylawyer.com
www.recklessdrivinglawyer.net
www.helpdisabilitylawyer.com
www.criminallawdc.com
www.duilawsdc.com

ADT Home Security in Virginia

Virginia Uranium Inc: Good Land Stewards?

by: Progressive86

Thu Sep 29, 2011 at 10:37:49 AM EDT


Here's a fabulously preposterous line from a full page ad released in the Danville Register and Bee on 9/28/2011 by Virginia Uranium Inc.:

For our company, stewardship of the land is more than a corporate principle; it is a deeply ingrained way of life that has sustained six generations of farmers, each striving to pass on this land in a better condition than they found it.

Better condition than they found it? How exactly do you dig up tremendous swaths of land and uranium ore and expect to leave the land "in a better condition?" Virginians in particular, and Americans in general, have seen this marketing game played before by natural resource pillagers, claiming on the one hand ideas of stewardship, intergenerational justice, and corporate social responsibility while kowtowing to the scriptures of capitalism. In effect, the consequence of the latter is a complete negation of the former, the complete dismissal of public-faced claims of stewardship.

Virginians should not and do not buy the land stewardship argument because it assumes that companies like Virginia Uranium Inc. will be willing and able to spend millions of dollars and years of time  to clean up the environmental mess that it will inevitably leave behind. How many mining companies have been such rigorous stewards of the land? No, fellow Virginians, let's not be fooled by this lofty rhetoric. Let's turn our attention to renewable sources of energy, not deadly ones.  

Progressive86 :: Virginia Uranium Inc: Good Land Stewards?
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

a nightmare.... (4.00 / 1)
This is simply a nightmare in the making.I am afraid money talks though.

You are correct (0.00 / 0)
You are correct this is a nightmare waiting to happen.Republicans and Democrats need to unite on this issue for the safety of Virginia.Virginia Uranium will be safe as long as the profits are coming in but once the money stops so will the safety.Virginia Uranium doesn't give a rats ass about being good land stewards they only care about the money and if anyone thinks other wise you are only fooling yourself.Lets not fool ouselves Virginia Uranium will try to sell this as a great job creater which it isn't.Watch what I tell you Virginia Uranium will buy votes on both sides of the isle on this one.

[ Parent ]
Hogwash (4.00 / 1)
There is not a farmer in the USA who strives to "leave the land in better condition" it is pure economics, they strive for maximum crop yield period just as any other enterprise strives for maximum production. VU will strive for maximum uranium production without giving a darn about the mess after extraction is done.

Exactly right, (0.00 / 0)
but I wont be surprised in the least if VUI begins taking the it's a local farmer who owns a majority of the company, after all, approach (i.e. Walter Coles). The reasoning being that, hey, if it's a local farmer who owns a majority stake in VUI, then VUI must have an interest in leaving the land in better condition.
We do know however that this is rubbish.  

Progressive86

[ Parent ]
Advertising

Donate to Blue Virginia

About
The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, and "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at lowell@raisingkaine.com and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.



RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page


Powered by: SoapBlox