Blog Roll
Who's My Legislator?

Virginia Blogs
All Things Education
Augusta Free Press
Crew of 42
Dixie Pig
Greater Greater Washington
Loudoun Progress
Ox Road South Blog
Pilot on Politics" blog
Power for the People
Richmond Sunlight
RVA Politics
Shad Plank
Vivian Paige

Find more about Weather in Arlington, VA
Click for weather forecast

Advanced Search

AlterNet: Richmonder Story on Ryan Insider Trading Not "Debunked" After All?!?

by: lowkell

Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 11:03:00 AM EDT

This past Saturday, The Richmonder posted a fascinating story providing evidence of possible insider trading by Willard Romney's running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, just prior to the 2008 stock market crash. As The Richmonder explained:
... Ryan attended a closed meeting with congressional leaders, Bush's Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on September 18, 2008. The purpose of the meeting was to disclose the coming economic meltdown and beg Congress to pass legislation to help collapsing banks.

Instead of doing anything to help, Ryan left the meeting and on that very same day Paul Ryan sold shares of stock he owned in several troubled banks and reinvested the proceeds in Goldman Sachs, a bank that the meeting had disclosed was not in trouble. This is the guy Republicans want one heartbeat away from the presidency? He seems more than a little shady to me.

On Monday, The Richmonder's story "went viral," as they say in social media lingo, with blogs and newspapers all over the world picking it up. But then...(cue ominous music)...the story was (supposedly) "debunked" by Benjy Sarlin of Talking Points Memo (TPM). The supposed "debunking" was based on one key fact, that "the meeting with Bernanke took place in the evening after trading hours, meaning Ryan wouldn't have had time to execute the move if he wanted to." In addition, not that we should care what pathological liar Willard's campaign has to say about anything, but they claimed "Ryan had nothing to do with the trades in the first place." Whatever.

So, based on this TPM "debunking," The Richmonder's story died. Except now it's apparently un-"debunked," thanks to great work by Lynn Parramore of AlterNET:

lowkell :: AlterNet: Richmonder Story on Ryan Insider Trading Not "Debunked" After All?!?
Look again.

First of all, the Romney campaign's claim that the transactions were index trades is not consistent with what's in the original disclosure reports. AlterNet discussed the controversy with money and politics expert Thomas Ferguson, who has written extensively on the bailout. He explained, "Ryan did own some index-based securities, but they stand out in the summaries. They are different from the many trades Ryan was making in individual stocks. It is perfectly obvious that he sold shares in Wachovia, Citigroup and J. P. Morgan on September 18 and he bought shares in Paulson's old firm, Goldman Sachs, on the same day. If these were index trades, what's on the form is nonsense."

While it's not possible to pinpoint exactly what Ryan knew and when he knew it, the whole episode becomes more disturbing the deeper you look into it.

Check out the entire story at AlterNET for yourself, but the bottom line is that "If you swallow the idea that Ryan just happened to buy Goldman stock that day -- a day he just happened to have a meeting with Hank Paulson, the firm's former CEO, well, then I have some unicorns I'd like to introduce you to." Me too. And a few bridges. And swampland property. Etc. Oh, and the word "gullible" is not in the dictionary, dontcha know? Heh.

What I find so pathetic here is how quick progressives and Democrats often are to back off on a story, even when there's a lot of evidence that it very well might be serious, at the slightest "denials" and "debunking" by Republicans, accepted (gullibly?) by a fellow, normally excellent, progressive website. In stark contrast, Republicans keep going and going and going on verifiable lies (e.g., their fallacious, insane claims on welfare, Medicare, Obama's "birth certificate," global warming "denial," etc, etc.), even after voluminous evidence, by non-partisan, unbiased fact checkers (and/or the CBO) has come out obliterating their claims. It's maddeningly frustrating, although of course it's also a healthy sign - in stark contrast to the right wing - that progressives actually care about honesty, the truth, empirical evidence, science, etc.

In this case, what JC Wilmore ("The Richmonder") did wasn't to prove anything definitively, but to dig out information that looks really suspicious, and basically put it out there for others to look into more deeply. Obviously, a small blog like The Richmonder doesn't have the resources of a major news organization, to dig in and really investigate this stuff. And, with all due respect to TPM, I strongly doubt they do either. Which is why for Benjy Sarlin to claim the story was "debunked," based on not much at all (the Romney campaign denials are utterly worthless, and I hope Sarlin didn't give them any credence at all), is (far) less than convincing.

Fortunately, others - Brad DeLong, AlterNET - have looked more closely at Ryan's activities and seen through the holes in Sarver's supposed "debunking." Having done so, they've resurrected the Ryan insider trading story to where it should have been all along: highly suspicious behavior by Romney's running mate, behavior that bears serious investigation, and ultimately legal action if appropriate (although my understanding is that Congresscritters exempted themselves from laws that would have sent you and me to jail for the same exact behavior. Nice, huh?).

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

DEVASTATING ... before & after (0.00 / 0)
Anyone who has traded on their portfolio knows that the exact timing of a transaction is well ... not exact.

If you do-it-yourself online through e-trade let's say ... there will be a lag between an order being placed and execution of that order.... whether you're buying or selling.

If you go through your broker it could take longer.

The central fact here is apparently irrefutable; namely a guy who had insider knowledge via access to high ranking meetings on banks that were VOLATILE ... affecting the financial stability of the country ... well the fact that the person (Paul Ryan)  made any major bank trades at all is SELF SERVING, OUTRAGEOUS and TREASONOUS (to use a Mudcat analogy).

They (the FBI) needs to put this bad dog down.

It wasn't just Ryan...check out Wikipedia - on Insider Trading (0.00 / 0)
Insider trading by members of Congress

Members of Congress are exempted from insider trading laws and thus can act on information they are bound to gain in the course of their congressional activities, although house rules[25] may consider it unethical. A 2004 study found that stock sales and purchases by Senators outperformed the market by 12.3% per year.[citation needed] Peter Schweizer points out several examples of insider trading by members of Congress, including action taken by Spencer Bachus following a private, behind-the-doors meeting on the evening of September 18, 2008 when Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke informed members of Congress about the imminent financial crisis, Bachus then shorted stocks the next morning and cashed in his profits within a week.[26] Also attending the same meeting were Senator Dick Durbin and John Boehner; the same day (trade effective the next day), Durbin sold mutual-fund shares worth $42,696, and reinvested it all with Warren Buffett. Also the same day (trade effective the next day), Congressman Boehner cashed out of an equity mutual fund.[27][28]

Yeah, it's egregious. (0.00 / 0)
What Ryan apparently did would be particularly so.

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Recent Law (0.00 / 0)
Remember, though, that a new law just passed to NOT exempt members of Congress, their staffs, and family members from trading on insider information was changed by moving blocks of text around in the office of the majority leader, our very own Eric Cantor. The fact that Cantor's wife is in the business of managing the money of wealthy clients, including herself and her husband, means that Cantor and his staff blew a huge hole in the new law, one that could allow his wife to continue to trade on inside information or political intelligence.

So, any member of Congress will be able to tell the info to a spouse or other family member, who can then execute the trades. Put another way, the new law has become worthless.

What Ryan seems to have done is despicable and sleazy beyond belief, but technically, at that time he was above the laws the rest of us must follow, just as his running mate must have been to amass an IRA worth $100 million.

[ Parent ]
Ryan (0.00 / 0)
What Ryan done was wrong but it was legal.Pelosi has done the exact same thing have you called her out for it ? If Ryan were a Democrat people would be defending him on this blog.Both Democrats and Republican have done the very same thing.It just depends on if they have a D OR R beside their name as to who is outraged out it.

Yes, we all know it was legal. (0.00 / 0)
And no, I would NOT defend this kind of behavior by Democrats.  In fact, let me make it very clear right here: this entire system is corrupt and deeply wrong, not to mention anti-progressive, whereby the people who write the laws exempt themselves from the laws, but the rest of us would go to jail for doing the same thing they can do with impunity. It's totally FUBAR, no excuses whatsoever for this crap by EITHER party. Having said that, the topic of today's discussion is Paul Ryan specifically. Can we focus on that for 1 minute without the standard lecture about how "both sides do it," blah blah blah?

Follow me on Twitter. Follow Blue Virginia on Facebook and Twitter.

[ Parent ]
Actually, (4.00 / 1)
while both sides may do it, the Republicans frankly do it with more elan and arrogance, sporting that annoying little frat boy smirk we have seen so often on their white male leaders, including Bush II. They know they are entitled to the gravy.  

[ Parent ]

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?



Donate to Blue Virginia

The purpose of Blue Virginia is to cover Virginia politics from a progressive and Democratic perspective. This is a group blog and a community blog. We invite everyone to comment here, but please be aware that profanity, personal attacks, bigotry, insults, rudeness, frequent unsupported or off-point statements, "trolling" (NOTE: that includes outright lies, whether about climate science, or what other people said, or whatever), and "troll ratings abuse" (e.g., "troll" rating someone simply because you disagree with their argument) are not permitted and, if continued, will lead to banning. For more on trolling, see the Daily Kos FAQs. Also note that diaries may be deleted if they do not contain at least 2 solid paragraphs of original text; if not, please use the comments section of a relevant diary. For more on writing diaries, click here. Thanks, and enjoy!

P.S. You can contact us at and you can subscribe to Lowell's Twitter feed here. If you'd like to subscribe to Miles Grant's Twitter feed, click here. For Teacherken, click here. For Kindler, click here.

P.P.S. To see the Blue Virginia archive, please click here. To see the Raising Kaine archive, please click here. To see the Blue Commonwealth archive, please click here.

RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blue Virginia - Front Page

Powered by: SoapBlox