To now, the teacher-scholar relationship between the Department of Defense and the President has been reversed. Obama has been led by the hand, blindly. Military matters were never his strength. With no idea where to turn, he kept the Bush team on. The McChrystal tempest should have been expected.

Hours after his inauguration, the Department of Defense (DoD) asked for and obtained authority to conduct a strike that blooded the new President. From that point forward, Obama has acquiesced to every important decision, carrying the failed Bush military policies forward not only in Southwest Asia, but around the world. Maybe that initial uncomfortable decision conditioned him and affects his approach to the DoD. Now is a time for him act Presidential. While the comments by McChrystal reported in a Washington Post article today and the subject of a Rolling Stone profile in this week’s edition are far from seditious, it is symptomatic of a potentially pre-cancerous condition that merits preventive intervention.

Half a century ago the new President was handed the portfolio for the Bay of Pigs, a Richard Nixon nurtured plan of action. John Kennedy had military experience, but it did not prepare him for the kind of inertia found even then in bureaucracies. Fortunately for Kennedy, the then Commandant of the Marine Corps, General David Shoup, intervened with a dramatic illustrative objection and provided a perspective that altered history.

Times have changed and Obama faces a tempo of activity that did not challenge Kennedy. There are the two wars. There is the economy. There is the Gulf of Mexico. And the quality of advice that he is receiving from a former Commandant fails in comparison to the counsel of Shoup. While it may be appropriate to can McChrystal, it is more important to fire the National Security Advisor, General James Jones. It is Jones who has failed most miserably. It is Jones who figured in the alienation of General Tony Zinni and helped position the bullying sycophant Richard Holbrooke as senior envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Zinni might have turned out as Obama’s Shoup. Now Obama has no one up to the task of taking on DoD or, for that matter, the State Department. Time for Obama to step to the podium but he is without a practical frame of reference or anyone to trust to provide it.

Update — The article is available online and it is a nightmare.

Attorney General Cuccinelli stubbornly continued his assault on science and reason with a recent court filing against the University of Virginia.  Super Cooch continues to press his “case” that  Professor Michael Mann committed “fraud” against state government by conducting climate change research that failed to conform to the looniest conspiracy theories of the far right:

“Neither academic freedom nor the First Amendment have ever been held to immunize a person, whether an academic or not, from civil or criminal actions for fraud, let alone immunized them from an otherwise authorized investigation,” Cuccinelli’s filing with the Albemarle County Circuit Court states.

In order to truly appreciate what a radical and precedent-shattering act Super Cooch has undertaken here, it’s important to understand what a deadly serious (and rare) situation it is for a state’s top legal official to charge someone with fraud for conducting legitimate academic research.

Wikipedia has a helpful list of categories of fraud, to illustrate the type of major crimes we’re talking about here:

Types of criminal fraud include:  • bait and switch • bankruptcy fraud • benefit fraud, committing fraud to get government benefits • counterfeiting of currency, documents or valuable goods […] creation of false companies or “long firms” • embezzlement, taking money which one has been entrusted with on behalf of another party • false advertising • false billing • false insurance claims • forgery of documents or signatures, • health fraud, for example selling of products known not to be effective, such as quack medicines, • identity theft • investment frauds, such as Ponzi schemes and Pyramid schemes • […] • rigged gambling games such as the shell game • securities frauds such as pump and dump • tax fraud, not reporting revenue or illegally avoiding taxes.

Also from Wikipedia is the following list of the 10 elements needed to prove fraud:

1. a representation of an existing fact; 2. its materiality; 3. its falsity; 4. the speaker’s knowledge of its falsity; 5. the speaker’s intent that it shall be acted upon by the plaintiff; 6. plaintiff’s ignorance of its falsity; 7. plaintiff’s reliance on the truth of the representation; 8. plaintiff’s right to rely upon it; and 9. consequent damages suffered by plaintiff

We’re not talking about debatable differences of opinion here, but rather about malicious lying in order to rip someone – or everyone – off.  And Super Cooch is aiming such heavy charges, not at a real criminal, but at one of the world’s most accomplished climate scientists.   Professor Michael Mann, currently Director of Penn State’s Earth System Science Center, is known not for cheating old ladies out of their Social Security checks or launching Ponzi schemes, but rather for publishing over 80 peer-reviewed journal articles and serving as a major contributor to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that have convinced countless scientists, and those who take science seriously, that climate change is a very dangerous trend for humankind that is being driven by human activities.

Considering how extensive Professor Mann’s work has been, it surely must include the occasional error, as all human works do, and as Mann – like all good scientists – has admitted when logic, mathematics, experimentation and/or empirical evidence have proven him wrong.  But the scientific process is designed to deal with errors by testing all propositions and disregarding those that don’t make sense, don’t conform with the facts or can’t be replicated.  

To inject a criminal fraud investigation into the honest differences of opinion that arise during scientific debate is to derail and exploit the whole scientific process for cheap political gain.  

But this is not to say that no one is committing fraud in this case.  In fact, a fraud trial may make sense if you simply shift the prosecutor to the defendant’s table.  Indeed, Cuccinelli’s attack on Mann, UVA and climate science in general sounds an awful lot like the knowing misrepresentation of facts for material gain.

You could say that Super Cooch is innocent because he actually believes what he is saying.  But this man is no backwoods yahoo.  Cuccinelli has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from UVA and both a J.D. and an M.A. in International Commerce and Policy from George Mason.  It is safe to assume he is smart enough to know that his misrepresentation of climate science is utterly spurious, but that he is pursuing it because he believes it can help his political career.    

He probably believes, justifiably, that he can benefit politically both from gaining more contributions from fossil fuel-driven corporations like Massey Industries and from winning more support from the hyper-paranoid Tea Party psychos who are busy taking over the Republican party.  

And so the man elected to protect Virginians from shysters and crooks is himself perpetrating what is arguably the greatest fraud in the Commonwealth’s history, trying to undermine current climate change theories, not through respectable scientific methods but though the blunt weapons of state power and virulent propaganda.  Like the nice-sounding man calling your grandma on the phone and telling her why she should hand over her bank account number, he does it all while trying to appear so earnest, logical and sincere.  

We can only plan and wait for his judgment day to come, whether it comes in court or at the polls – when Cuccinelli’s fraud is ultimately rejected and science triumphs over yet another political swindler.

This is beyond stupid. This is Sarah Palin/Joe Barton stupid! In all seriousness, if Keith Fimian had his way, BP would regulate itself, government would let Big Oil do whatever it wants, and Gulf of Mexico oil disasters would be commonplace.  Why would anyone vote for someone with Keith Fimian’s toxic political philosophy?  I suppose if they hate pelicans, dolphins, turtles, clean water, white sandy beaches, and people who live on the Gulf coast, it makes perfect sense.  

Annabel Park and Eric Byler seem to be hitting it big with their superb film on the Prince William County battle over immigration, 9500 Liberty. In coming weeks, the film will be opening in El Paso, Houston, Seattle, Minneapolis, Denver, Wilmington, Chicago, Dallas, Salt Lake City, Atlanta, and several other cities. Extremely impressive. Meanwhile, here in Virginia, Prince William County Board of Supervisors Chairman Corey Stewart hopes to take his so-called “rule of law” resolution statewide, prompting at least one person to challenge him for his job.  Frighteningly, Stewart has ambitions for statewide office, possibly LG in 2013.  Just imagine a ticket of Kook-inelli for Governor, Corey Stewart for LG, and…I’m afraid to ask who the Republicans will come up with for AG.  You thought it was bad now?  Just give it 3 more years, it’s a near certainty the Republicans will work on making it worse.

Great job by Miles Grant on this. I also strongly recommend The Oil Drum for superb, albeit technical, discussion of the Deepwater oil disaster. Often, over the past couple months, I’ve learned about things at The Oil Drum that didn’t appear in the “mainstream” press until weeks later, if ever. Check it out.

Earlier today on ABC’s “This Week,” after blasting BP and its apologists in the Republican Party (“That is a philosophy. That is an approach to what they see. They see the aggrieved party here as BP, not the fishermen.”), White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel (alias, “Rahm-bo”) had this to say about a comprehensive climate and clean energy bill:

“[Senators meeting at the White House this Wednesday] know the president’s perspective…[Obama’s] goal now, now that the House passed a bill, is to get the Senate to pass a comprehensive energy bill that reduces our dependence on foreign oil, makes key investments in the areas of alternative energy so America leads in that space, and deals fundamentally with the environmental degradation that happens from carbon pollution.”

Sounds good to me, just make it happen Rahm-bo!  

In related news, Joe Lieberman weighs in as well, claiming “there are 50 senators that want to put a price on emitting carbon, 30 against it and 20 members who are undecided.” Assuming Lieberman is right, and I must say I’m skeptical, it’s time to call those 20 swing Senators and tell them we need climate action now!