Home Blog Page 3192

Tea Party Splits over 5th District Endorsement

5



Accoring to the Lynchburg News & Advance, the tea party right-wingers in the 5th congressional district are now officially divided over whether to support the Republican nominee, state Sen. Robert Hurt (R-Chatham). Some of the tea partiers refuse to “forgive” Hurt for his rational vote in support of former Gov. Mark Warner’s budget that got the state out of a fiscal hole.  This development is bound to help Rep. Tom Perriello’s bid for re-election.

Leaders of the Lynchburg Tea Party stated in a news release that they won’t endorse any candidate in the 5th District. Instead, they are “drawing a line in the sand.” Further, the release also criticized some tea party people who are supporting Hurt.

According to the News & Advance, partier Kurt Feigel said, “We congratulate Robert Hurt on his recent victory. However, we cannot and will not endorse a candidate that does not align with our core principles.”

Sounds good to me! I would encourage all those partiers to raise money for the independent far-rightie in the race, Jeffrey Clark, as well.

Clark, who runs a small business in Danville, is officially the third candidate in the race. Without much in the way of resources, Clark normally would be just another meaningless quixotic challenger who couldn’t affect an election’s outcome. However, this split among the far right in the 5th just might give Clark enough momentum to peel off some votes from Hurt.

When interviewed last week by WSLS-TV, Clark said, “I think [Republicans] think that me being in the race will split the vote and give Tom Perriello the win but this is not about Congressman Perriello. This is about the system.”

Now, if fellow 5th District GOP loser Jim McElvey could just be persuaded to endorse Clark and hand him some money!  

Scary graphs illuminate jobs crisis

0

All of us know friends and /or family who have lost their jobs, students who graduated from college jobless, and too many who have been looking and looking for work for months. These graphs illustrate a frightening trend and puts our jobs crisis in shocking clarity. 

This first graph shows the ratio of employed Americans to the adult population. At the start of the current recession (highlighted in blue), this figure plummeted showing the sharp decrease in employed Americans as the economy rapidly shed jobs.

graph1

This next graph compares this recession to previous recessions by percent job losses.

graph 2

Graph #3 highlights the frightening percentage of unemployed workers who have been out of work for over 27 weeks or more. In May 2010, there were a record 6.763 million people unemployed for 27 weeks or more, or a record 4.38% of the labor force. This is drastically higher than during previous recession periods.

As the AP reports:

The proportion of people jobless for six months or more has accelerated in the past year and now makes up 46 percent of the unemployed. That's the highest percentage on records dating to 1948. By late summer or early fall, they are expected to make up half of all jobless American

 

graph 3

Graphs from Calculated Risk blog.

If your roof fell in, what would you do?

0

6 for 1 

Right now, there are 5-6 jobless workers for every one job opening, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI).

As AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said after Congress left jobless workers hanging:

We are in a jobs emergency—a national crisis. Millions of lives are in ruins and children are being condemned to poverty. Excuses from their elected representatives are of no help to them….Working family voters will not forget who sided with them and who did not.

If your roof fell in, what would you do?

You'd probably invest in fixing the roof.

Well the roof, in terms of this country’s unemployment, has fallen in and it's time to fix it. Job creation is what will make the economy strong and as our friend's with the Virginia Organizing Project found in Charlottesville and Danville working families in Virginia know it.

We need bold action, not rhetoric. It’s time to pass the Local Jobs for America Act (H.R. 4812). It will create or save more than 675,000 local community jobs and more than 250,000 education jobs, according to the latest estimates from the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee.

We need jobs. Period.  Working family voters know that and make sure your Congressman knows it too.

Never Waste a Chance to Exploit Your Believers

6

So Sarah Palin is coming to Hampton Roads for something called Freedom Fest 2010; “A Salute To Our Military and First Responders.” These schtiks seem to have displaced the ubiquitous travelling revivals as cash cows. The 501(3)c has replaced the religious tax shield. The final destination for the income is more murky.

Just what kind of salute is this? Honoring military and first responders by charging them admission to be honored? How about showing a little appreciation by reaching into your pockets and providing them free admission and some beer and barbeque? Smacks of those selections to be “honored” in “Who’s Who;” simply send money to defer the cost of inclusion.

Yes, a circus is coming to Norfolk. Sarah and George Allen and Ollie North accompanied by Lee Greenwood. While we can’t be certain what the price of meeting Sarah and Ollie might be (“There are very few Platinum VIP reservations left, so don’t delay!”), you can be guaranteed an autographed copy of Allen’s new book with the purchase of two tickets. “What an excellent Father’s Day gift!” You think George is going to direct those proceeds to the local Emergency Medical Services. “You betcha!”

In Praise of Perriello

2

He won his seat in 2008 by 727 votes over a longtime incumbent

perriello

McCain carried his district.

He voted for healthcare reform and for the energy bill.

He is in the crosshairs of Sarah Palin.

Republicans and – thanks to Citizens United – corporations will spend millions to defeat him.

He is one of the very best Congressman around.

His name is Tom Perriello, of Virginia’s 5th Congressional District, and I want to praise him.  

I first met Tom at the 2008 Virginia Jefferson-Jackson Day dinner in Richmond.  For many, that was the event that had to be moved to Virginia Commonwealth to handle the massive crowds with both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama speaking.  I was able to get back to the Marriott before most people, catching a ride with some friends from Richmond.  Thus I was one of the first people into an event which State Senator Creigh Deeds held to introduce Tom to the assembled Old Dominion Democrats.  I got to talk uninterrupted for about ten minutes, then observed his interactions with others as they came.  

I later was invited as a blogger to an event in DC organized by progressive people of faith, a term very applicable to Tom, who lives and has lived his deep Catholic faith while working for progressive values.  On the Sunday before Memorial Day, when we were in the Charlottesville area for my birthday celebration, my wife and I bought Tom brunch, and my wife came away very impressed.

During the 2008 campaign, Tom was the only out of town candidate on whose behalf I traveled to campaign, because I support him that strongly.  I took him to the National Democratic Club to introduce him to some people from labor to get their assistance, and they were impressed.  And when he was sworn in, his celebration had to be moved to a large room because so many people wanted to come and celebrate, and I was privileged to introduce new Representative Perriello to the man representing the adjacent district in NC, my friend Brad Miller.

I could write about what Tom has done as a Congressman.  I will limit that portion of my remarks to this:  last August he held more Town Halls than any other Democratic Congressman, never flinched in the face of the organized Tea Party Protests, heard them out and kept his cool, and in the process developed a huge amount of respect among people in the district.  

I have attended two very interesting fundraisers for Tom in the past few weeks.  The earlier one was at the home of David and Shayna Englin in Alexandria.  David is a rising star in the Virginia House of Delegates.  Shayna told the assembled supporters that they felt so strongly about supporting Tom that this was the first fundraiser they had held at their home for anyone except David, and that they were giving him more money than they had given any other candidate – other than David, of course.  I saw several families with more than one generation in attendance.  And as is often the case with Tom, during Q &A his intelligence, his passion, and his sense of humor were all on display.

Last night Tom had a fundraiser at the Town House of the National Democratic Club to which I had first taken him during the last campaign.  I noted two out of state Congressmen who showed up for the event.  Retiring Chair of the House Appropriations Committee David Obey came by early, and Rep. Mark Schauer of Michigan stopped by near the end.  In his own remarks, Tom aptly described Obey as among the last of the Rust-belt populists.  

Others among the more than 40 in attendance were Steve Shannon, former delegate and nominee for VA Attorney General, was introduced Tom. Others of note included Paul Reagan, chief of staff to Senator Jim Webb;  Mary Ann Hovis (herself daughter to the late Rep. Pat Jennings of the Fighting 9th in SW Virginia), a major figure in the Fairfax Democratic Committee;  Rose Chu, another important person among Fairfax Dems;  and Libby Garvey of the Arlington County School Board.  This was an event put on by a business group, and those in attendance were strong in their support of Tom.

Dave Obey has said about Tom, “If we could carbon copy Tom Perriello, Democrats would be better off,”   I agree.

I scribbled a lot of notes during Tom’s remarks and during Q&A, where once again his formidable intelligence and passion were clearly demonstrated.  Let me try to offer a few observations drawn from those notes.

Tom was especially appreciative not only of the money people have given him:  “You’ve not only sent us your checks, but sent us your children.”  It is worth noting that Tom’s campaigns have had the passionate commitment of young people, both paid and volunteers.  For those who don’t know, during the last campaign Tom tithed his volunteer hours – 1/10 of the time they worked was as volunteers for community groups and non-profits throughout the district.  He is of a generation that believes in service, which he has demonstrated in his own life, so he runs his campaigns that way.  He remarked that growing up in the Charlottesville area  his generation had a sense that change was possible.  We could look back 150 years to when some owned people and women were very restricted.  If we looked ahead 150 years what might they say about our time, the 30,000/day dying from treatable health situations? What else might they say about us?

Tom worked for non-profits in Africa, dealing with the Blood Diamond situation in Sierra Leone.  He mentioned that the original peace conference was of three different government groups and excluded too many voices.  It was only when the voices of others, such as the women who had been subjected to brutal treatment, were included that a lasting peace became possible.  

He spoke of his pride in some of things accomplished in his first term, like health care reform, but did not ignore disappointments of still not having a meaningful national energy policy, and expressed his concern at what was happening in the Gulf.

You can be bold and pragmatic at the same time

–  an expression that really caught my attention.  After saying this Tom talked about the idea of creating good jobs –  what would a $20/hour job look like?  How can we create those in a district that is hurting?  Southside Virginia, included in the 9600 square miles (around the size of NJ) and 22 counties of the 5th  Congressional district, used to be a major economic driver for the Commonwealth, with furniture, tobacco and textiles.  Now there are communities where the unemployment is exceeding 25%. Tom sees this as he travels around the district, more than a thousand miles on the average weekend.  

He admires Obama, of whom he said in response to a question that no political figure in his lifetime had inspired the way the President does, both as President and Commander-in-Chief.  He acknowledges that Obama is not a populist, rather more of a centrist.  He is creating transformation, but pretty much through centrist policies.  He disagrees with some of the economic policies of the administration, something he has expressed to the President.  He looks at people like Larry Summers and thinks they have too much of a focus on policies that still amount to helping those at the time and depending upon trickle down.  He wants to see a greater emphasis on jobs.  Yes, the administration averted a depression, which is no small feat, but we still need to create more jobs.  And Tom asked this pertinent question:  

What are we going to build, grow, or make in this country?

 He said of himself in comparison to the President

I’m a little more angry.  I think people are getting screwed.

Since his election, Tom Perriello has been on the radar –  of Dems who know how vulnerable his seat could be, and of Republicans determined to oust him from what they view as “their seat.”  His Republican opponent is someone who does not inspire passion among the Republican base, and there is a possibility of an independent run by one of the handful of Tea Partiers who tried for that nomination.  Tom operates on the assumption that he will need to win 50% of the vote.  He has raised over $2 million, and has around $1.6 million on hand.  He plans to runs a grassroots campaign, already having around 30 people in place doing field operations.  He will need as much help as he can get, financial and otherwise.

The campaign will be setting up to allow people from elsewhere to make calls from their homes on Tom’s behalf.

He still wants your children – and you – if you have the time.

Democrats know the importance of this seat, and even more, of this Congressman. He got onto Transportation and Infrastructure as a freshman, allowing him to be the person who gets credit for the millions of stimulus money that has come into the district.  The administration has already given him an event with Secretary of Education Duncan, and he will shortly be doing a telephone town hall meeting with my good friend Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack.

In 2008 Tom came from more than 30% down to win by 727 votes.  So far this cycle he has been leading in what polling is available, but he takes nothing for grante.

He can’t.  

Not in a district won by John McCain despite the huge increase in turnout by African-Americans and young people for Obama.

Not as big a target as he is for some on the right.

Not when the kinds of attacks aimed at him have already included cutting the gas line to his brother’s barbecue in the belief that it was Tom’s home.

He is hardworking.

He is committed to his district.

He listens, but he is also unafraid of taking a stand on important issues even should it cost him his seat.

He deserves our support.

Money is tight right now for my wife and myself.  We have already given Tom $200 this cycle, and will give at least another $400 before it is over, meaning he will have received more from us than any other candidate ever except for Jim Webb in 2006.  

Time is tight, but we will make time to help him hold that seat.

We do not live in his district.  But we are progressives, and he is our representative even if his district is 100 miles away from our house.

I am honored to know Tom Perriello, to consider him a friend.

I ask that you help him as well.

Visit his campaign web site

If you can, get involved

And even if you don’t have the time, offer some financial support

I teach government.  I tell my students that in my own participation I have met many outstanding public servants.  I put Tom Perriello at the top of that list, ranking with anyone I have ever met.

I strongly support him.  I ask that you do as well.

Thanks.

And Peace!

The Problem with Jon Stewart’s Comedic Rant on SC (and National) Democrats

4

Jon Stewart, comedic host of The Daily Show, usually gets his facts right, often more so than the so-called MSM.  But now Stewart blamed SC Democrats for the plight of the opponent (Vic Rawl) of the hapless Alvin Greene. The problem with this is Stewart’s wrong.  

There was funny business in Greene’s running.  There were voting machine irregularities. There was an influx of Republican voters. And, there is so much more to this story than Stewart would suggest, much more.

Consider the following:

• Green WAS likely a plant, according to US rep James Clyburn. Clyburn knows something about that because he has been the victim of similar sabotage.

• Greene was unemployed.

• He had no money and even claimed he didn’t so he could get a public defender last year.

• He magically had the money to spend over $10 k to file for his Senate run. Yet (again) he had no money.

• He filed no campaign finance forms, as required by law, and has not identified the source of the $10,400 he spent.

• He did not campaign, send out mailings, or even have a website.  So, it was not a real campaign. How did the word get out?  I am not buying Stewart’s explanation.  Here’s why:

• In at least 25 precincts, Greene received more votes than were actually cast. Hear the rest of Olbermann’s litany of irregularities at the above (most recent) link.

• There was a 40% increase in turnout for the Democratic primary.

• Voters reported pushing the vote button having voted for Vic Rawl only to have the results page show Alvin Greene.

• There were other, apparently systemic,  voting machine irregularities.

• AND crossover votes by Republicans were allowed.

And lest there be any doubt, check out the best blogger on election reform issues anywhere, Bradblog here. I love Jon Stewart.  However, he’s done a real disservice to justice and electoral fairness in this instance. Contrary to Stewart’s rant-claim, there was and still is funny business related to this race. Now the AG won’t even look into the complaint. The fix is in. It also appears that Jon Steward fell for it. One thing is clear now: Skulduggery is alive and well in SC politics. It is also far from the first time.  

President Obama’s Speech: Specificity? Climate Change? Where’s the Beef?

1

Courtesy of the White House, here are President Obama’s remarks, “as prepared for delivery.”  My thoughts? The speech talked about the need for clean energy, but no real specifics about how to achieve that. Also, where was the talk about climate change?  How about a cap and/or tax on carbon?  Why the language, “before we allow deepwater drilling to continue,” as opposed to “IF we allow deepwater drilling to continue?”  As Populista says, “Huge missed opportunity. Courage would be nice, courage would be calling for a specific, bold plan that the moment deserves.” And as NRDC Action Fund tweets, “Obama never shied away from saying we needed healthcare reform… why not climate change?”  The thought I kept having while watching this was, the President has the bully pulpit, but ultimately he can’t force the Senate to take action.  And right now, the Senate doesn’t appear to be taking action.  Ugh.

With that, here’s the President’s speech.  Read it and decide for yourself if this was what we needed to hear, 2 months into this unprecedented U.S. oil catastrophe.

Good evening.  As we speak, our nation faces a multitude of challenges.  At home, our top priority is to recover and rebuild from a recession that has touched the lives of nearly every American.  Abroad, our brave men and women in uniform are taking the fight to al Qaeda wherever it exists.  And tonight, I’ve returned from a trip to the Gulf Coast to speak with you about the battle we’re waging against an oil spill that is assaulting our shores and our citizens.

On April 20th, an explosion ripped through BP’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, about forty miles off the coast of Louisiana.  Eleven workers lost their lives.  Seventeen others were injured.  And soon, nearly a mile beneath the surface of the ocean, oil began spewing into the water.

Because there has never been a leak of this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology.  That is why just after the rig sank, I assembled a team of our nation’s best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge – a team led by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and our nation’s Secretary of Energy.  Scientists at our national labs and experts from academia and other oil companies have also provided ideas and advice.

As a result of these efforts, we have directed BP to mobilize additional equipment and technology.  In the coming days and weeks, these efforts should capture up to 90% of the oil leaking out of the well.  This is until the company finishes drilling a relief well later in the summer that is expected to stop the leak completely.

Already, this oil spill is the worst environmental disaster America has ever faced.  And unlike an earthquake or a hurricane, it is not a single event that does its damage in a matter of minutes or days.  The millions of gallons of oil that have spilled into the Gulf of Mexico are more like an epidemic, one that we will be fighting for months and even years.

But make no mistake:  we will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long it takes.  We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused.  And we will do whatever’s necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy.

Tonight I’d like to lay out for you what our battle plan is going forward:  what we’re doing to clean up the oil, what we’re doing to help our neighbors in the Gulf, and what we’re doing to make sure that a catastrophe like this never happens again.

First, the cleanup.  From the very beginning of this crisis, the federal government has been in charge of the largest environmental cleanup effort in our nation’s history – an effort led by Admiral Thad Allen, who has almost forty years of experience responding to disasters.  We now have nearly 30,000 personnel who are working across four states to contain and cleanup the oil.  Thousands of ships and other vessels are responding in the Gulf.  And I have authorized the deployment of over 17,000 National Guard members along the coast.  These servicemen and women are ready to help stop the oil from coming ashore, clean beaches, train response workers, or even help with processing claims – and I urge the governors in the affected states to activate these troops as soon as possible.

Because of our efforts, millions of gallons of oil have already been removed from the water through burning, skimming, and other collection methods.  Over five and a half million feet of boom has been laid across the water to block and absorb the approaching oil.  We have approved the construction of new barrier islands in Louisiana to try and stop the oil before it reaches the shore, and we are working with Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida to implement creative approaches to their unique coastlines.

As the clean up continues, we will offer whatever additional resources and assistance our coastal states may need.  Now, a mobilization of this speed and magnitude will never be perfect, and new challenges will always arise.  I saw and heard evidence of that during this trip.  So if something isn’t working, we want to hear about it.  If there are problems in the operation, we will fix them.

But we have to recognize that despite our best efforts, oil has already caused damage to our coastline and its wildlife.  And sadly, no matter how effective our response becomes, there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done.  That’s why the second thing we’re focused on is the recovery and restoration of the Gulf Coast.

You know, for generations, men and women who call this region home have made their living from the water.  That living is now in jeopardy.  I’ve talked to shrimpers and fishermen who don’t know how they’re going to support their families this year.  I’ve seen empty docks and restaurants with fewer customers – even in areas where the beaches are not yet affected.  I’ve talked to owners of shops and hotels who wonder when the tourists will start to come back.  The sadness and anger they feel is not just about the money they’ve lost.  It’s about a wrenching anxiety that their way of life may be lost.

I refuse to let that happen.  Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness.  And this fund will not be controlled by BP.  In order to ensure that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account must and will be administered by an independent, third party.

Beyond compensating the people of the Gulf in the short-term, it’s also clear we need a long-term plan to restore the unique beauty and bounty of this region.  The oil spill represents just the latest blow to a place that has already suffered multiple economic disasters and decades of environmental degradation that has led to disappearing wetlands and habitats.  And the region still hasn’t recovered from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.  That’s why we must make a commitment to the Gulf Coast that goes beyond responding to the crisis of the moment.

I make that commitment tonight.  Earlier, I asked Ray Mabus, the Secretary of the Navy, a former governor of Mississippi, and a son of the Gulf, to develop a long-term Gulf Coast Restoration Plan as soon as possible.  The plan will be designed by states, local communities, tribes, fishermen, businesses, conservationists, and other Gulf residents.  And BP will pay for the impact this spill has had on the region.  

The third part of our response plan is the steps we’re taking to ensure that a disaster like this does not happen again.  A few months ago, I approved a proposal to consider new, limited offshore drilling under the assurance that it would be absolutely safe – that the proper technology would be in place and the necessary precautions would be taken.

That was obviously not the case on the Deepwater Horizon rig, and I want to know why.  The American people deserve to know why.  The families I met with last week who lost their loved ones in the explosion – these families deserve to know why.  And so I have established a National Commission to understand the causes of this disaster and offer recommendations on what additional safety and environmental standards we need to put in place.  Already, I have issued a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling.  I know this creates difficulty for the people who work on these rigs, but for the sake of their safety, and for the sake of the entire region, we need to know the facts before we allow deepwater drilling to continue.  And while I urge the Commission to complete its work as quickly as possible, I expect them to do that work thoroughly and impartially.      

One place we have already begun to take action is at the agency in charge of regulating drilling and issuing permits, known as the Minerals Management Service.  Over the last decade, this agency has become emblematic of a failed philosophy that views all regulation with hostility – a philosophy that says corporations should be allowed to play by their own rules and police themselves.  At this agency, industry insiders were put in charge of industry oversight.  Oil companies showered regulators with gifts and favors, and were essentially allowed to conduct their own safety inspections and write their own regulations.  

When Ken Salazar became my Secretary of the Interior, one of his very first acts was to clean up the worst of the corruption at this agency.  But it’s now clear that the problems there ran much deeper, and the pace of reform was just too slow.  And so Secretary Salazar and I are bringing in new leadership at the agency – Michael Bromwich, who was a tough federal prosecutor and Inspector General.  His charge over the next few months is to build an organization that acts as the oil industry’s watchdog – not its partner.

One of the lessons we’ve learned from this spill is that we need better regulations better safety standards, and better enforcement when it comes to offshore drilling.  But a larger lesson is that no matter how much we improve our regulation of the industry, drilling for oil these days entails greater risk.  After all, oil is a finite resource.  We consume more than 20% of the world’s oil, but have less than 2% of the world’s oil reserves.  And that’s part of the reason oil companies are drilling a mile beneath the surface of the ocean – because we’re running out of places to drill on land and in shallow water.

For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered.  For decades, we have talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels.  And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires.  Time and again, the path forward has been blocked – not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor.  

The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight.  Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be here in America.  Each day, we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil.  And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.

We cannot consign our children to this future.  The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now.  Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash American innovation and seize control of our own destiny.

This is not some distant vision for America.  The transition away from fossil fuels will take some time, but over the last year and a half, we have already taken unprecedented action to jumpstart the clean energy industry.  As we speak, old factories are reopening to produce wind turbines, people are going back to work installing energy-efficient windows, and small businesses are making solar panels.  Consumers are buying more efficient cars and trucks, and families are making their homes more energy-efficient.  Scientists and researchers are discovering clean energy technologies that will someday lead to entire new industries.    

Each of us has a part to play in a new future that will benefit all of us.  As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of good, middle-class jobs – but only if we accelerate that transition.  Only if we seize the moment.  And only if we rally together and act as one nation – workers and entrepreneurs; scientists and citizens; the public and private sectors.  

When I was a candidate for this office, I laid out a set of principles that would move our country towards energy independence.  Last year, the House of Representatives acted on these principles by passing a strong and comprehensive energy and climate bill – a bill that finally makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America’s businesses.

Now, there are costs associated with this transition.  And some believe we can’t afford those costs right now.  I say we can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy – because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.

So I am happy to look at other ideas and approaches from either party – as long they seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels.  Some have suggested raising efficiency standards in our buildings like we did in our cars and trucks.  Some believe we should set standards to ensure that more of our electricity comes from wind and solar power.  Others wonder why the energy industry only spends a fraction of what the high-tech industry does on research and development – and want to rapidly boost our investments in such research and development.  

All of these approaches have merit, and deserve a fear hearing in the months ahead.  But the one approach I will not accept is inaction.  The one answer I will not settle for is the idea that this challenge is too big and too difficult to meet.  You see, the same thing was said about our ability to produce enough planes and tanks in World War II.  The same thing was said about our ability to harness the science and technology to land a man safely on the surface of the moon.  And yet, time and again, we have refused to settle for the paltry limits of conventional wisdom.  Instead, what has defined us as a nation since our founding is our capacity to shape our destiny – our determination to fight for the America we want for our children.  Even if we’re unsure exactly what that looks like.  Even if we don’t yet know precisely how to get there.  We know we’ll get there.  

It is a faith in the future that sustains us as a people.  It is that same faith that sustains our neighbors in the Gulf right now.        

Each year, at the beginning of shrimping season, the region’s fishermen take part in a tradition that was brought to America long ago by fishing immigrants from Europe.  It’s called “The Blessing of the Fleet,” and today it’s a celebration where clergy from different religions gather to say a prayer for the safety and success of the men and women who will soon head out to sea – some for weeks at a time.

The ceremony goes on in good times and in bad.  It took place after Katrina, and it took place a few weeks ago – at the beginning of the most difficult season these fishermen have ever faced.

And still, they came and they prayed.  For as a priest and former fisherman once said of the tradition, “The blessing is not that God has promised to remove all obstacles and dangers.  The blessing is that He is with us always,” a blessing that’s granted “…even in the midst of the storm.”

The oil spill is not the last crisis America will face.  This nation has known hard times before and we will surely know them again.  What sees us through – what has always seen us through – is our strength, our resilience, and our unyielding faith that something better awaits us if we summon the courage to reach for it.  Tonight, we pray for that courage.  We pray for the people of the Gulf.  And we pray that a hand may guide us through the storm towards a brighter day.  Thank you, God Bless You, and may God Bless the United States of America.

Polls Are Closed: Election Results Open Thread

1

The polls are now closed in the 26th House of Delegates district and the 27th House of Delegates district.  Please feel free to use this as an open thread, and let’s hope for huge upset victories by Kai Degner and William P. “Bill” Brown.

UPDATE: Well, so much for the 27th district, where Roxann Robinson has won easily.  With 19 of 20 precincts reporting, it’s Robinson 2,914 (71.59%) vs. Brown 1,156 (28.40%).

UPDATE #2: With 6 of 21 precincts reporting in the 26th district, it’s Degner 2,041 (47.83%)-Wilt 1,991 (46.66%).

UPDATE #3: So much for the 26th district.  With 17 of 21 precincts reporting, it’s Wilt 5,508 (64.09%)-Degner 2,714 (31.58%).  Bummer.

UPDATE #4: Ben Tribbett does what he does best, analyzing last night’s election results.  The conclusion? In the 26th district, “In a best case, dream scenario- where Democrats turned out every single voter who showed up in the Obama-Clinton primary in the 26th District- they still fall over 2,000 votes short to the Republican candidate.” And in the 27th, “Not only was this race winnable, but had Democrats been successful in even getting half of their primary voters back to the polls, they would have won in a landslide.”  Click here to read more about why Democrats put resources into the 26th and not the 27th.

Pied Piper of Petroleum Punts

0

Republican Senator Frank Wagner (VA-7th) announced the obvious last evening: we have an environmental disaster. Virginia offshore drilling’s strongest advocate averred that for now “…quite frankly I do not want to come in front of you here and promote it.” At least until the ink on investigation is dry.

“I will tell you that when this investigation is complete you are going to find out that equipment wasn’t maintained properly, warning signs were ignored…and it was a corporate attitude of profits over safety…and you’re also going to find lax government oversight over the inspections…”

Wagner called for three things that must happen: 1) they have to get it plugged, 2) capture as much oil as they can, and 3) clean up. He called for a thorough investigation and speculated that as with most JAG investigations he has been involved with (and he elicited Ben Loyola’s concurrence), inevitably there is not one mistake, but a series of mistakes that reflects an attitude within the command that allowed the accident to happen.

“People are saying, can’t you just plug this?…I don’t think you have any idea what it is like working 500 feet under the water, much less 5000…I can assure you that BP, and not just BP but every other major oil company who has equipment…has offered it to bring every resource to bear because all of them have as much to lose as BP…”

But Wagner also pointed out that we didn’t abandon the space shuttle program because of the Challenger and nothing has changed the fact that America spends 500 billion dollars annually buying energy outside the borders of this country.

“Nothing like this spill has ever occurred in more than 60 years of oil and natural gas exploration in the Gulf’s U.S. waters.” – American Petroleum Institute (API)

“There were 4000 wells in the Gulf of Mexico; never had an accident like this.” – Senator Frank Wagner

The Senator should stick to the carefully crafted API talking points. From June 3 1979 until March of 1980 some 140 million gallons of oil spilled from a 2 mile deep exploratory well in the Bay of Campeche off of Cuidad del Carmen, Mexico. That well, lxtoc I, was eventually brought under control by drilling relief wells.

On defense for now, a punt is always made with the intent of going back on offense with better field position.