OMG…I Agree with Ralph Smith!

    83
    7
    SHARE

    Wow. The environmental threat of mining uranium in central Virginia, near water sources that quench the thirst of Hampton Roads and the first time such mining will have been attempted on the East Coast, has elicited stances from some politicians the opposite of what I expected. I never would have believed that the Democratic minority leader of the State Senate, Dick Saslaw,  in support of mining, would ridicule all concerns for the environment by saying he wouldn’t be around in a hundred years, so he wasn’t going to worry about future generations. But, to his eternal shame, that’s what he said.

    My own state senator, a right-wing Republican guy I have never agreed with in the past, Ralph Smith, voted “no” on lifting the moratorium, and he made perfect sense in his reasoning why. He said there are simply too many unanswered questions about the containment of radioactive tailings for him to vote to end the moratorium.

    Smith said, “If I’m the guy building that [containment] liner and paying for that liner, I don’t want to spend any more than I have to. If I’m the neighbor, I want it really thick. I think that [environmental regulation] needs to be decided first, then bring it to us and we will vote.”

    Saslaw’s comments showed a callous, self-serving, short-sighted disregard for Virginia and for the public health of its citizens. The fact that he and his family don’t live near the proposed uranium mine should have nothing to do with such an important decision. If I’ve ever seen a DINO who needs to have a primary opponent, it’s Dick Saslaw. According to VPAP, the industries that donated the most to Saslaw’s re-election in 2011 were energy and natural resources. I think I smell a connection.

    At the very least, the regulations that will govern such mining, as well as the specific details of any mining operation and how environmental regulation would be paid for, should be spelled out before any vote to go forward with mining.  

    Dick Saslaw also should be required to read the report by Dr. Michael E. Moran that was prepared for the Roanoke River Basin Association in Danville. Here are some highlights:

    “Virginia Uranium has failed to present any sort of detailed project proposal, in writing. The verbally-described plans have changed constantly, depending on the audience.”

    “As proposed, the Coles Hill project would require over 5 billion gallons of water. During the start-up period, the project would use at least 525.6 million gallons per year.”

    Virginia Tech was the official sponsor of the National Academy of Sciences report that studied the possible mine. The NAS study was not allowed to make a recommendation on the feasibility of such a mine. The Moran report notes that, “The total recent funding received by VA Tech and its staff from Virginia Uranium exceeds $1,023,000.” Need I say more?

    This whole situation is a case of the “fix” being in from the start. If not, then legislators must prove it to me by demanding detailed mining plans from the mis-named “Virginia Uranium,” allow the NAS to recommend a course of action, and spell out regulatons for the mine before lifting the moratorium. Otherwise, just admit that the end of the ban was purchased from corrupt legislators, and that our children and grandchildren will be left with whatever the future holds. Saslaw will be dead.

    • kindler

      What exactly is the point of electing a “Democrat” like Dick Saslaw anyway?  So he can reject his constituents’ values and spit in their faces?

    • Peter Rousselot

      Once again, Dick Saslaw has demonstrated why he should not be the leader of the Democratic Party in the Virginia State Senate. As shocking, reprehensible and misinformed as his comments about uranium mining are, they are part of a long history of failed leadership which I previously documented here: http://bluevirginia.us/showDia… His latest comments should spur on a vigorous Democratic primary challenge to him in 2015 if he should try to be re-elected.

    • rogerdrew

      I agree with Ralph. It is indeed dangerous to mine for uranium near the water resources. This can cause serious damage to animals as well as mankind.

      http://www.steamarena.com

    • totallynext

      Looking at the water source it runs right into their biggest economic visitor source…the outer banks!  The impact to that region could be devasting.

    • hereinva

      Its a “healthy drinking water for all Virginia citizens” issue. Its about taking a long view (future generations) versus short term/immediate gratification.

      Imagine if the founding fathers planned only for the immediate…and not consider consequences for future generations.

      Apparently Senator Watkins wants a site specific bill (impacting only Coles Hill?) perhaps to take the “heat” off from N.VA? Regardless: Virginia is a “commonwealth”..all for one, one for all…and this cannot be sliced or isolated to one region. I hope Sen. Saslow will re-consider his position.

    • Elaine in Roanoke

      There is an inherent conflict in this type of business that impacts the environment and public health over long periods of time. The company wants to maximize its profits and keep costs the lowest it can. Those living in the proximity of the business want to stay protected and healthy, no matter the cost. If there isn’t an impartial, honest regulator to protect the environment while balancing the interest of the business, inevitably the environment and the people lose, whether it’s Love Canal, the American Cyanamid plant at Piney River, the Kepone poisoning of the James River, etc., etc., etc.  

      Our corrupt method of financing elections makes fair regulation  nearly impossible to achieve. The people of Pittsylvania County can’t provide bribery in the form of trips to Paris and Canada, or huge campaign contributions.

      Ralph Smith is not willing to agree to something as potentially dangerous as uranium mining in our climate without seeing what the regulations will look like. Saslaw, by contrast, doesn’t give a hoot about the people there or future generations. He’s a poor excuse of a representative and the people of his district should do something about that at election time.