McDonnell Disses Referendum on His ABC Obsession
It seems that Bob McDonnell doesn't see the need for a referendum on the issue of privatizing the state's ABC stores. Most other decisions about state control of alcohol sales have been put to referendum, but he thinks his plan should be different. Why? Is McDonnell afraid that the voters won't agree to his scheme to give away a large revenue source? Does he think he is somehow above putting radical changes in state policy to referendum? Maybe he agrees with George Bush, who once declared that a dictatorship is better...if he is the dictator. (We all saw how that turned out.)
He told the Washington Post, "If the General Assembly insisted on a referendum then it's something certainly I'd consider." Excuse me, but if the legislature insists on a referendum, it's not up to McDonnell to "consider" it. It will be done, unless he wants to veto any chance of privatizing alcohol sales by refusing to sign a bill containing a referendum.
In the next sentence of his remarks to the Post McDonnell assured us that he wants "to make sure that we have money dropping in the bottom line on all our government reform issues as fast as possible." Now, I don't think I can adequately intepret that Palin-esque statement. Does he mean he wants the bottom line of the budget to "drop," i.e., show lower revenue and expenditures? Or, is he saying he wants to assure that the money from ABC sales isn't lost to the "bottom line." Hard to say, huh?
Since ABC profits amounted to $112 million of the $322 million returned by ABC stores to the General Fund last year, Mac and his acolytes must be counting on a whopping price tag for those licenses to sell spirits. After all, he did say that, magically, he won't change the money the state gets from those sales, money that supports education, law enforcement, social programs, etc. The last time we got a "promise" of that sort was the lie Jim Gilmore told us about the cost to the state of that "no car tax" we still pay every year. I don't know about you, but I simply don't trust any Republican promise that when they take away revenue for government, there will, miraculously, be no loss in revenue. GOPers might think that they can work that sort of fiscal hocus pocus, but I've lived long enough to see how miserably they fail at handling things like money and budgets.
Tim Kaine on Appropriate Biking Gear for a 51-Year-Old
Does this video make you want to take a bike ride on a Virginia trail this weekend? Does it make you want to wear spandex, or do you prefer something "more appropriate for a 51 year old?" :) If either of those is the case, then you might have something in common with former Governor Tim Kaine, interviewed here by "Car Less Brit" for the Star City Harbinger (not sure where the website is, but I found the Facebook page) as he pedals along the Roanoke River Greenway. Whether in spandex or not, this looks a lot more relaxing than debating Michael Steele, that's for sure!
Whipple Clips Dozen: Saturday Morning
1. MCDONNELL PROMISES HIS ABC PRIVATIZATION PLAN WILL KEEP NEARLY $250 MILLION FLOWING TO GENERAL FUND
2. STUDY DOWNPLAYS RISK OF PRIVATIZING VA.'S LIQUOR STORES
3. MCDONNELL HITS HAMPTON ROADS TO PITCH LIQUOR STORE SALE
5. MCEACHIN: MCDONNELL SHOULD HAVE DENOUNCED NULLIFICATION
6. MCDONNELL RELIED ON EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE TOO
9. STATE SEN. ROBERT HURT SPEAKS TO LYNCHBURG TEA PARTY
10. HOUSE CANDIDATES DUELING NOT JUST OVER RECORDS BUT ABOUT DEBATES
12. REP. NYE VISITS TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN
14. TEA PARTY ACTION GROWS IN JAMES CITY
16. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA NOW REQUIRES STUDENTS TO DISCLOSE ARRESTS, CONVICTIONS
20. HIGH-TECH COMPANIES VOLUNTEER TO DIGITIZE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY'S RECORDS
31. MAJOR WINDSTORMS TEST THE D.C. AREA'S FONDNESS FOR MATURE TREES








