For Immediate Release

March 17, 2010      

MCDONNELL POISED TO SIGN DANGEROUS GUN LEGISLATION

State Police Chiefs Describe Guns in Bars as a “Recipe for Disaster”

Richmond, VA- Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell has until April 12 to take action on three unpopular gun bills that would put state residents at greater risk of gun violence:  SB 334, SB 408, and HB 1217.  Four gun violence prevention organizations-the Virginia Center for Public Safety (VACPS), the Virginia Chapters of the Million Mom March, Protest Easy Guns (PEG) and the Angel Fund-are calling on Governor McDonnell to veto this dangerous legislation and stand by a March 10 press release where he declared, “The foremost obligation of government is public safety.”  

SB 334 would allow concealed carry permit holders to bring loaded handguns into establishments that have a liquor license in Virginia, including bars, nightclubs, restaurants, pizza parlors and bowling alleys.  The bill would bar permit holders from consuming alcohol while armed, but contains no mechanism to enforce this provision.  

The legislation is directly at odds with the expressed wishes of Virginia residents.  In an October 2009 Christopher Newport University poll, 68% of likely voters in Virginia answered “No” when asked, “Do you think people with concealed weapons permits should be allowed to bring their weapons into restaurants that sell alcohol?”  

SB 334 is also opposed by the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police and the Virginia Hospitality and Travel Association.  In a letter to Governor McDonnell on behalf of the state’s police chiefs, Virginia Beach Police Chief Jake Jacocks, Jr. wrote, “We can fully expect that at some point in the future a disagreement that today would likely end up in a verbal confrontation, or a bar fight, will inevitably end up with gunfire if you sign this legislation into law.”

Bar owners would be allowed to put up a sign that prohibits firearms in their establishments if the bill is signed into law, but as Robert Hodges, the owner of Bud Foster’s Restaurant, noted, “How likely is someone from out of town to enter a restaurant or bar where they have a big sign posted that says ‘No guns allowed?'”  

Randy Rayburn, a Nashville restaurant owner, has commented on the effects of Tennessee’s gun in bars law on the state’s tourism industry:  “It’s very critical to our industry that our customers and our employees feel safe … [The law] has been used against our industry by our competitors across the country to encourage tourism and conventions to not come to our cities in Tennessee.”  

Another bill on Governor McDonnell’s desk, SB 408, would allow those without concealed carry permits to keep loaded handguns in their vehicles or boats if stored in a locked container such as a glove compartment.  Previously, Virginia residents were required to keep loaded handguns in plain view in their vehicles so that law enforcement could easily spot weapons during traffic stops.

Finally, HB 1217 requires the Virginia Board of Education to establish a standardized program of gun safety education for students in elementary school.  The National Rifle Association’s “Eddie Eagle” program is named in the legislation as being an appropriate model for the Board.  The legislation ignores numerous studies that demonstrate that familiarizing children with guns makes them more-not less-likely to handle firearms when adults are not present.

Despite the fact that the NRA’s Director of Federal Affairs was a member of his transition team, “Governor McDonnell promised to pursue a moderate path as Virginia’s Governor,” said Andy Goddard, President of the Richmond Chapter of the Million Mom March.  “Unfortunately, rather than focusing on issues that Virginians are deeply concerned about-such as transportation, the economy and jobs-Governor McDonnell encouraged his friends in the legislature to waste valuable time considering dozens of bills promoted by the gun lobby.”  

“The governor talks about the importance of public safety, but in practice he has cut millions of dollars in public safety funding from the state budget and supported a number of dangerous changes to Virginia’s gun laws,” said VACPS Board Member Lori Haas.  “Commonwealth families now have one last chance to hold him to his word and insist he veto SB 334, SB 408 and HB 1217.”

CONTACT:  Lori Haas of VACPS at (804) 399-4893 or clewthaas@comcast.net, Andy Goddard of MMM-VA at (804) 240-5614 or info@mmmrichmondva.org, Abby Spangler of PEG at abbyspangler@protesteasyguns.com and Joe Samaha of Angel Fund at contactus@angelfundva.org.

The Virginia Center for Public Safety (formerly known as Virginians Against Handgun Violence) is a statewide organization that was founded in 1992 after a young person was shot outside a school in Hampton Roads.  The organization seeks to create a safer Virginia through education, public forums, youth outreach, and work in the public policy arena.  VACPS believes that a chief cause of gun violence is the easy access that criminals and youth have to guns in the state.

As the nation’s largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, working with its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.

Protest Easy Guns is a grassroots protest movement of Americans that emerged in response to the deadliest shooting rampage in U.S. history at Virginia Tech. We are outraged at how easy it is to obtain a gun in the United States and believe it is time to change lax laws that allow criminals and dangerous individuals easy access to guns.  Each of the movement’s “Lie-In” protests includes 32 individuals (symbolizing the number of students and teachers murdered at Virginia Tech) who lie on the ground for just a few minutes (signifying the brief amount of time it takes to buy a gun in the United States). Our goal is to encourage like-minded citizens to stage their own protests around the country so that we can influence the public discourse and ultimately the legislative process with regard to this critical national problem.

Angel Fund is the family, friends, neighbors and advocates of Reema Samaha, who was tragically killed on April 16, 2007 at Virginia Tech by a lone gunman, along with 31 other students and faculty.  There were many complex issues that contributed to the Virginia Tech tragedy: mental illness, campus safety and security, lack of information sharing, privacy and gun laws.  We would like to address those policies and laws we felt contributed to the tragedy and to seek practical and reasonable solutions to avoid another similar tragedy.  We, therefore, would like to honor Reema’s memory by making the world a safer place through education, advocacy and implementing practical solutions.  

[poll id=”

1

“]

This diary is cross-posted at Blue Commonwealth

In the 1960s my father-in-law provided health insurance for employees of his small business.  Little did we know how ahead of his time he was.  A survey by the Small Business Majority found that even today only 46% of small business owners provide health insurance, but 76% of them struggle meeting their premiums.  The 54% who do not provide coverage say they cannot afford it.  Let me pause here: The majority of small business owners do not provide health insurance for their employees. It is their employees who most likely are caught in private individual plans which get slammed over and over and which get canceled at the drop of a hat.  Some companies drive up the cost of policies solely to induce “high risk” patients to drop their policies.  It is clear that both individuals and small businesses need both relief and reform.

Meanwhile, the upward trajectory of health care costs for small businesses continues.  In 2009 costs are around 3.42 billion.  MIT economist Jonathan Gruber estimates they will go up to around 7.43 billion in 2018.  One of the most vocal opponents of health insurance reform is the national Chamber of Commerce, which runs particularly troublesome and questionable ads.  They do not get it.  Not only would health insurance reform reduce personnel costs, a real public option would could ultimately produce far greater savings.  With Medicare overhead costing only 4%, private insurance pales in efficiency of delivery.  Further efficiencies in delivery of Medicare services, such as elimination of over-payments to the so-called (fake) Medicare “Advantage” plans and greater effort at fraud reduction will drive home even more savings.  (Proponents of reform failed utterly to explain these over-payments and their ruinous effect on the future of Medicare.  It is the absence of reform which hurts Medicare.)

While most of the conversations about health care have focused on how it will affect individuals, little has been offered regarding the benefits of reform for small business, the primary engine for job growth in a market where larger companies often offshore and downsize.

Here are just a few examples to add to the reform aspects mentioned above:

• Exempts small businesses (<50 employees) from sharing insurance premium costs with employees.  That means 96% of small businesses would not have to pay part of the premium.  

• Reduces costs and increases negotiating leverage by creating exchanges which encourage competition among insurers to the benefit of small business and the self employed.

• Provides individual tax credits on a sliding scale for about 25 uninsured million Americans.

• Implements many cost-containment provisions.

–electronic records,

–paperword simplification,

–changind the way doctors and hospitals are paid (better results not number of procedures and tests),

–new alternative system of statewide not-for-profit coops.

• Beginning in 20010 gives small business tax credits for those small businesses offering insurance.  This should help 3.6 million companies better afford health insurance for their employees.

• Provide new regulatory authority to prevent large, unjustified increases in premiums, as happened recently in both CA and MN.

• Ends discriminatory practices particularly injurious to small businesses and the self employed, such as raising rates based on health status, age, or pre-existing conditions.  

• Reduces the federal deficit by $130 billion over the next 10 years.

Given that there is no employer mandate in the health care bill, I am baffled at the behavior of some supposedly pro-business entities opposing reform.   Their behavior seems more political/partisan than rational.  Although there are shortcomings in this bill (particularly that it doesn’t go far enough in reforming the system or provide a truly public option), hurting small businesses isn’t one of them.