Home Blog Page 3357

Jeff Barnett Introduces Himself By Asking For Money

5

Like many people who are involved in the political process, I get tons of emails everyday and many of them are simply emails sent out to their lists either asking for money or some sort of other action. A candidate  that has a good communications team in place will send out emails every now and then that simply provide updates on the campaign. Some campaigns even try to use their lists to send out information to their supporters before it makes the info available to the general public (a prime example of this is how the Obama campaign had people sign up to receive a text message announcing who his VP pick would be prior to it being announced). Although the finance shop in some campaigns would like the list to be utilized almost like an ATM and constantly send out requests for donations, I strongly believe that in the early stages of a campaign the list can be more valuable in getting information out about a candidate and including bits and pieces about how people can also get more information.

It appears as though someone on Jeff Barnett’s campaign didn’t think of this concept as he sent out an email with the subject line “Please allow me to introduce myself.” When I saw this, I was expecting a good email that included some of his positions on the key issues facing the 10th and perhaps some information about his own background. Now he did point out that he was a 26 year veteran and that he’d lived in Northern Virginia with his wife for a number of years, but what struck me as odd was that while he didn’t lay out how his background qualified him to work on these topics while trying “to introduce” himself, he did manage to ask for money three times. That’s not sticking with the spirit of trying to use an email list to truly interact with grassroots supporters.

Barnett Introduction

I have enough commonsense to know that email lists are designed to spur people into action. Heck, I’ve even advised campaigns on how to use their email lists more efficiently in the heat of campaign season. The email the Barnett campaign sent out suggests that they are placing more emphasis on trying to get money out of the people on the list rather than actually giving them information and trying to engage them on the grassroots level. This doesn’t rule out the possibility that the campaign might change it’s focus later in the campaign, but it definitely isn’t a great way to make an introduction.

As someone who has knocked on thousands of doors and made thousands of phone calls into the 10th Congressional District in support of various candidates, I know first hand that it will take a large grassroots effort to defeat Frank Wolf in November. While I’ve seen Rich Anthony spending the time reaching out to the grassroots and expressing an interest in getting more people involved in the political process, I haven’t see the same enthusiasm so far from Barnett. Although I haven’t made an endorsement in  this race, this has raised some concerns for me about Barnett’s chances of winning and the style of leadership he would show if elected to Congress. So while people might try to dismiss this as one email, I think it really represents a much bigger picture that I’m seeing from his campaign.

Gerry Connolly To Vote “Yes” On Health Care Reform

4

Add another Virginia Democrat to the “yes” list on health care reform legislation. Now, we just need Congressmen Boucher and Nye. C’mon guys, you can do it!

WASHINGTON – Congressman Gerry Connolly (D-VA-11) said today he will vote for the historic health insurance reform legislation scheduled for a vote Sunday in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“For the past year, my constituents have told me they want health insurance reform, but only if it meets certain tests,” Connolly said.  “Will it bring down premiums for families and small businesses?  Will it reduce the deficit?  Will it protect their choice of plan and doctor?  Will it improve access to care?”

“The answer to each of these questions is ‘Yes, it will’,” Connolly said in a statement to be delivered on the House floor.

More after the “flip”

“I and many others in the House may have reservations about elements of this Senate bill, but after carefully reviewing the reconciliation bill before us today I am confident that this final reform package does still meet those tests outlined for me by my constituents,” he said.

“Make no mistake.  This is not an easy vote for any of us,” Connolly said.  “We are tackling an issue that Congresses before us have been struggling with for the better part of the past century since Teddy Roosevelt first called for comprehensive health care in America.”

Calling the vote a “historic crossroads,” Connolly said, “We can choose to set our nation on the path to improving the access to and quality of health care for millions of Americans, young and old, and finally containing the costs of that care, or we can continue the status quo.  Doing nothing threatens to leave more families without the basic care they need and bankrupt our small businesses, the engine of our economy, as they buckle under the costs of providing insurance for their employees.”

Connolly said the legislation will safeguard Medicare benefits for another generation, close the so-called doughnut hole to lower drug costs for seniors, protect guaranteed benefits, and cut waste, fraud, and abuse in the program.  “Without reform, AARP says millions of seniors and their families will be at risk of bankruptcy because of skyrocketing costs for long-term care services.”

In the 11th Congressional District of Virginia, Connolly said the legislation will: lower premiums by 14 to 20 percent for the self-employed and others who purchase their own insurance, provide tax credits and other assistance to help 87,000 families and 16,800 small businesses afford coverage, and protect more than 1,400 families from medical bankruptcy in the next year alone.

“These are meaningful reforms for which Democrats, Republicans, and the American people can be proud,” he said.  “Contrary to what some might contend, this is a bipartisan bill.  The House and Senate bills include distinct Republican ideas and amendments.  In fact, 147 of them are in the bill before us today.  But rather than engage in a rational, thoughtful debate on this complex and critical reform, the organized opposition has preyed on the public’s fear and anxiety and repeatedly fallen back on bumper-sticker slogans.”

“Right now, 14,000 Americans lose their health care coverage each day because of out-of-control costs.  We cannot afford to delay any longer,” Connolly said.

Cooch: Unabashed, Homophobic Nutjob

1

Ken Cuccinelli proves that he’s back in the Stone Age, or maybe the “Father Knows Best” 1950s, when homosexuality actually was considered a “a detriment to our culture.” Of course, Cuccinelli has no evidence to back this up.  It’s also ironic that he makes this claim, as his pal “Sideshow” Bob Marshall argues the opposite, that “gay individuals seem to have more income, to attend more cultural events, to take more vacations than the rest of us.” Last I checked, having more income and attending more cultural events didn’t make someone a “detriment to our culture,” but since when did these haters care about facts or logic?  Take the “debate” on health care reform, for instance, where people on Cooch’s team have been screaming about phony “death panels” and “government takeovers of health care” and other falsehoods.  The only questions are, why does anyone listen to these people, and of course why does anyone in their right mind vote for them?

h/t Not Larry Sabato

Media Matters: “Fox’s Final Push to Kill Health Care Reform”

1



The right-wing noise machine is in high gear, spewing out “hyperbolic rhetoric” and “outright falsehoods.” In other words, just another day at the office for Glenn, Sean, etc.

Obama: “Time for Action on Financial Reform for the Economy”

0



The full transcript is here. Here’s an excerpt:

…these reforms include a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency to prevent predatory loan practices and other abuses to ensure that consumers get clear information about loans and other financial products before they sign on the dotted line.  Because this financial crisis wasn’t just the result of decisions made by large financial firms; it was also the result of decisions made by ordinary Americans to open credit cards and take on mortgages.  And while there were many who took out loans they knew they couldn’t afford, there were also millions of people who signed contracts they didn’t fully understand offered by lenders who didn’t always tell the truth.

This is in part because the job of protecting consumers is spread across seven different federal agencies, none of which has the interests of ordinary Americans as its principal concern.  This diffusion of responsibility has made it easier for credit card companies to lure customers with attractive offers then punish them in the fine print; for payday lenders and others who charge outrageous interest to operate without much oversight; and for mortgage brokers to entice homebuyers with low initial rates only to trap them with ballooning payments down the line.

Video: Obama at GMU

1



This is the last 9:52 of President Obama’s speech earlier today; I’ll post the rest of the video when it finishes uploading to YouTube. The video isn’t the greatest quality, but I think you can feel the crowd’s energy. Also, it was great being just 15-20 feet away from Obama as he gave his speech. Hopefully, Obama’s GMU speech will kick off a weekend in which Congress finally – after decades of trying – passes comprehensive health care reform and it is signed into law.  At least, that’s the plan!

UPDATE: The rest of the video is now available, after the “flip.”

“Kudos to Tom Perriello For Telling the Truth”

0

UPDATE: Waldo’s take is, “Teabaggers upset with Perriello for agreeing with them.” Very funny.

Catholics United Launches Southside Ad Campaign Challenging Abortion Funding Claims

0



From Catholics United.

Beginning today, Catholics United will run a television ad that will set the record straight about false allegations of federal abortion funding in the Senate health care bill.  The purpose of the 30-second spot is remind legislators, like Rep. Tom Perriello, and his constituents that taxpayer funding of abortion is expressly prohibited in pending health care legislation, and that the bill has earned the support of a broad swath of the Catholic community.  The ad will run in saturation in the Richmond, Roanoke and Lynchburg media markets.

“A Patients’ Bill of Rights on Steroids”

3

Speaking at The Patriot Center at George Mason University today, President Barack Obama told approximately 8,000 attendees that the Health Care Reform bill could be called a “Patients’ Bill of Rights on Steroids.” Obama’s speech was like a just-before-the-buzzer three-pointer: a perfect throw through the hoop to a wildly cheering crowd composed of students, parents, retirees and diverse middle Americans who chanted “Health Care Now!” and “Yes We Can!” repeatedly, utterly drowning out a few initial feeble boos. Although several dozen protesters outside displayed posters of the President as Adolf Hitler and The Joker, and one waved a sign “Taxed Enuf Already,” they were not only outnumbered but outclassed by the pro-Obama, pro-health care crowd.  

The President began by recalling how he had visited George Mason three years ago, at the very beginning of his campaign, when “the Conventional Wisdom in Washington was that change was too hard,” and most of the Insiders could not even pronounce his name.

Three years later, Obama said, at the end of a long and agonizing year of debate and an excrutiating, sometimes messy, legislative process, Congress is now ready to vote on health care in just a few days. This is the culmination of a hundred years’ of discussion, beginning with Republican President Teddy Roosevelt, who first proposed that every American should have access to health care.  Since his time many Presidents, both Democratic and Republican have attempted health care legislation.  The President admitted he did know just how the vote would turn out; the media and the pundits seem to be concentrating on side questions such as “will this help the Democrats?” or “will this hurt Obama,” and “what do the polls say?” Obama said emphatically that he did not care about those questions (meaning, they are the wrong questions) but only about finally doing the right thing.

Scoffing at the wild and ridiculous distortions of the health care bill made its opponents, President Obama frankly attacked the unconscionable greed of today’s health insurance industry, and cited a couple of anecdotes in evidence. The bill will provide millions of Americans with coverage who are presently uninsured, and young people can continue to be covered under their parents’ policies for a period of time after they graduate and are still getting established in the job market. The bill will end denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions as well as halting the infamous practice of cancelling coverage if you get sick and actually need to use your insurance. Small businesses will be able to offer employees the same kind of coverage Congress has so carefully arranged for itself, and there are tax credits to help business and lower-income workers to pay the cost.

Yes, explained the President, this broader coverage and regulation of the insurance industry will have a cost. It is not free, and his administration will pay for it through reduction in administrative costs and elimination of medical fraud.  In fact, he noted proudly, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that this health care reform will actually reduce the deficit by over 138 Billion dollars over 10 years.  What a remarkable achievement, unlike the previous administration, which passed a prescription drug benefit without paying for it. “Students, we will not be taking out a credit card in your name to pay for health care reform in the future.” The crowd loved it.

I worked as a Volunteer on the floor of the Patriot Center, checking tickets for those admitted to the inner circle close to the podium. The event was open to the public otherwise, and no tickets were required. The crowd included a broad spectrum of America as well as a number of foreign visitors who were, I suspect, mostly students at GMU. The evening before I had attended a Volunteer Training session; when I arrived about 7:30 PM I found a crowd composed half of young (everyone looks young to me nowadays) students who had made signs for use outside the Patriot Center, and the other half of retirees (some in their 70’s and 80’s) and people who hurried in afer working a full day. In other words, a typical Obama crowd, very diverse and bursting with energy. The tide is turning, I believe, and health care has the momentum now if today’s Obama-event is any indication.