Saturday, May 15, 2021
paid advertisement
Home Tags Sex

Tag: sex

Video: Led By Anti-LGBT Bigot Dave LaRock, Virginia House Republicans Vote...

Culminating a week in which Virginia House Republicans went after a woman's right to choose, clean energy, etc, etc., a few minutes ago they...

Did a Loss of Sexual Powers Make Trump More Evil?

I'm surprised to find myself thinking about Trump's sex life-- and not a propos of his violating campaign laws with illegal pay-offs, and not...

The Sacred Space of Lovers — the Op/Ed

This is the piece I wrote about toward the end of the article I posted here yesterday. It's a piece that ran in the...

The Sacred Space of Lovers (Third in the Series, “A Better...

Never Underestimate the Light Side of the Force The answers I promised in the first installment related mostly to the problematic aspect of the human...

If You Can’t Defend McDonnell, Attack the Messenger

090601 Bob McDonnell photo 090601BobMcDonnell.jpgWhat we have here, is the failure of circumspection so common among neo-conservatives. The "here" are the personal attacks resulting from yesterday's post about former Governor McDonnell's accumulating and compounding hypocrisy. Somehow facts and evidence are irrelevant in the neo-conservative world unless they support your position.

It must be painful to have fallen for the original McDonnell shtick hook, line and sinker. Accepting this new fiction of a defense with all its twists, turns, and subplots as relief for the cognitive dissonance caused by recent revelations provides relief. Then someone points out the concurrent serial hypocrisy of McDonnell embracing a priest who casually violated his vow of celibacy with another man; behaviors McDonnell has blatantly condemned as antithetical to his core conservatism. This resonates and echoes hypocrisy. There is no argument that can refute the blatant self-serving behavior of their fallen hero, so resort to personal attacks.

Suddenly the raw truth of the McDonnell formula for defense being revealed is turned on its head and becomes an attack by the left on homosexuals. That is some desperation. This is just another brick in the wall McDonnell is building to defend himself. And we are cautioned that if we want to sway public opinion we need to make nice. Part of one rant is not only unintelligible but also contains utter nonsense:

"But it does show you an insight into the liberal extremist mind. Democrat (sic) bloggers, especially Lowly (sic), must not really like gay people. They need their votes, and the fact that they don't like religion makes gay people social "brothers in arms" with hatemongers like Lowly (sic), but in reality they only use gay people to shore up their own power."
Where to start?