Citigroup gave Jack Lew $940,000 ONLY if he got a high-level government position


    This makes me sick.  My stomach is churning as I write.

    Thursday’s WSJ, reporting on confirmation hearings for President Obama’s nominee for Treasury Secretary, Jack Lew, revealed the answer to Senator Elizabeth Warren’s question about why no banksters are in jail.…

    Why not?

    Because the banks pay the banksters only if they take high-powered policy or regulatory positions from which they can protect themselves and their co-conspiratorts.

    Here’s Senator Hatch reading from Jack Lew’s contract with Citigroup.

    . . . Third, your employment agreement included a clause stating that ‘your guaranteed incentive and retention award’ would not be paid upon exit from Citigroup but there was an exception that you would receive that compensation ‘as a result of your acceptance of a full time high level position with the United States Government or a regulatory body.’


    1.  He gets a bonus.

    2.  But if he leaves Citigroup he does NOT get the bonus.

    3.  HOWEVER, if he leaves Citigroup for “a full time high level position with the United States Government or a regulatory body,” then, he gets the money.

    No matter what you think about Hatch or the WSJ . . . and, in my case, that’s not much . . . Hatch appears to be reading from Lew’s contract with Citigroup and not making up accusations.

    Think about:  We will give you close to a million $$$ ONLY if you leave here and go to work for the very people who are regulating us — wink, wink, wink.

    Cue the theme music from The Sopranos.…

    Why do any of us even try to be honest and hard-working?

    I’m writing to Senators Kaine and Warren, asking them to NOT support Lew.  Lew needs to step down and go back to Citigroup. Or to jail.