Home African Americans Here’s Some Background – and Some Responses – For the Next Time...

Here’s Some Background – and Some Responses – For the Next Time You Hear Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Sears, Jason Miyares, etc. Ranting About “Critical Race Theory”

The right wing uses CRT "as an umbrella term the right-wing movement uses to turn its mostly white adherents’ racial anxiety into political energy"

0
Advertisement

Until very recently, you almost certainly had never heard of the phrase “Critical Race Theory” – “an academic concept that is more than 40 years old,” the “core idea [being] that racism is a social construct, and that it is not merely the product of individual bias or prejudice, but also something embedded in legal systems and policies.”

Seems pretty obvious, right? I mean, of course slavery wasn’t just based on “individual bias or prejudice,” but on a system of laws and policies (and economics, culture, etc.) that made slavery legal, made returning escaped slaves illegal, etc. And “Jim Crow” wasn’t just based on “individual bias or prejudice” either, but again, on a system of laws and policies that enforced and perpetuated it. Is any of this in any way controversial or difficult to comprehend? Nope – unless, of course, you are trying very hard NOT to understand it. Which is exactly what right wingers/Republicans (including Virginia Republicans like gubernatorial nominee Glenn Youngkin, LG nominee Winsome Sears and AG nominee Jason Miyares) are doing right now. As a recent article in Vox explains:

“There’s a debate raging over the history and legacy of American racism and how to teach it in schools. The current iteration of this debate (and there have been many) stretches back to 2019, when the New York Times published the 1619 Project, but it evolved into a kind of moral panic in the post-Trump universe, in part because it’s great fodder for right-wing media.

The hysteria over critical race theory, or CRT, has now spilled beyond the confines of Twitter and Fox News. As I explored back in March, conservative state legislatures across the country are seeking to ban CRT from being taught in public schools.

There are lots of angles into this story, and frankly, much of the discourse around it is counterproductive. The main issue is that it’s not clear what these concepts mean, as tends to happen when ideas (à la postmodernism) escape the confines of academia and enter the political and cultural discourse.

Conservatives have appropriated critical race theory as a convenient catchall to describe basically any serious attempt to teach the history of race and racism. It’s now a prop in the never-ending culture war, where caricature and bad faith can muddy the waters…”

When Vox refers to a “convenient catchall,” they aren’t kidding. Check this out, from a recent article in Education Week:

“One conservative organization, the Heritage Foundation, recently attributed a whole host of issues to CRT, including the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, LGBTQ clubs in schools, diversity training in federal agencies and organizations, California’s recent ethnic studies model curriculum, the free-speech debate on college campuses, and alternatives to exclusionary discipline—such as the Promise program in Broward County, Fla., that some parents blame for the Parkland school shootings.”

Also from that Education Week article:

“The charge that schools are indoctrinating students in a harmful theory or political mindset is a longstanding one, historians note. CRT appears to be the latest salvo in this ongoing debate.

In the early and mid-20th century, the concern was about socialism or Marxism. The conservative American Legion, beginning in the 1930s, sought to rid schools of progressive-minded textbooks that encouraged students to consider economic inequality; two decades later the John Birch Society raised similar criticisms about school materials. As with CRT criticisms, the fear was that students would be somehow harmed by exposure to these ideas.

So that’s basically what Critical Race Theory (CRT) is – and isn’t – and why right wingers have seized on it.  For instance, see below, with Glenn Youngkin claiming CRT “has no place in our schools” and is “a political ideology.” WTF? Or how about 2021 VA GOP  Lt. Governor nominee Winsome Sears, who (falsely) claims CRT is “nonsense” and “detrimental to our schools.” Or 2021 VA GOP Attorney General nominee Jason Miyares, who really ratchets up the shrillness and hyperbole, arguing (falsely/absurdly) that “we can’t survive as a nation if we are raising an entire generation of children to learn to hate their country.” Hahaha, that’s right; according to Jason Miyares, if children are taught about the history of race and racial discrimination in America, including how it was embedded in laws and policies, then…”we can’t survive as a nation.” Totally bizarre and truly disoriented/disordered thinking. Let’s just make damn sure someone who thinks that way, such as Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Sears or Jason Miyares, is never elected to high office here in Virginia…

Finally, see below for some tweets about the right-wing hysteria over CRT:

  • Oliver Willis: “CRT is almost perfectly designed bait because liberals always wanna explain shit out of a misguided notion you can talk down cultists. ‘It’s dumb, shut up’ is the only way to respond to the manufactured hysteria but that isn’t happening.”
  • Charles Blow: “For the life of me I can’t figure out why these people have jumped on critical race theory as the ultimate boogeyman. Few people knew about it and even fewer studied it. All I can come up with is that it *sounds* offensive to them.
  • Sarah Kendzior: “The attack on ‘critical race theory’ has little to do with theory and more a fear of: 1) historical accuracy 2) students recognizing a continuous line between atrocities of the US past and present 3) students recognizing parallels between atrocities in the US and other nations.”  Also, why right wingers jumped on this formerly obscure phrase: “Because it has the words ‘critical’ (negativity), ‘race’ (controversy) and ‘theory’ (ambiguity) in a row. They don’t care about the actual meaning of the term; to them, it’s just a potent combination of words that they can redefine to suit their agenda and manipulate emotions.”
  • Matthew Gertz: “Parents who opposed critical race theory on Fox News are GOP activists, report says.” Also: “In this case, a sophisticated, nationwide network of conservative think tanks, advocacy groups, media outlets, and GOP officials have seized on the term and, in the words of Christopher Rufo — a senior fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute and a key player in the effort — sought to render it ‘toxic’ and apply to it ‘the entire range of cultural constructions that are unpopular with Americans.'” Also: “‘critical race theory,’ like ‘cancel culture’ and ‘political correctness’ before it, also functions as an umbrella term the right-wing movement uses to turn its mostly white adherents’ racial anxiety into political energy.”
  • Imani Gandy: “Conservatives do this thing where they redefine words and then people use those definitions as if they are accurate. We gotta stop doing that.”
  • Ralph Northam: “Critical race theory is a dog whistle that the Republicans are using to frighten people” and “I think the more we know about our history, the better.”
  • Sean Perryman:Critical race theory isn’t being taught in our schools. It’s a Republican dogwhistle.”

So yeah, the next time you hear Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Sears, Jason Miyares, or any other right winger out there…see the above thoughts and responses, and proceed accordingly.

 

There's no paywall on Blue Virginia, and we definitely want to keep it that way! If you want to help support our work, you can donate here - thanks! Also, you can sign up for our weekly email list here.