Home Blog Page 2012

Video: Jeb Bush says climate change has been “coopted by the hard-core left”

0

This dolt also says, “for the people to say the science is decided on, this is just really arrogant, to be honest with you.”  Hello corporate media, are you ever going to call out leading 2016 Republican candidates for this insanity (and yes, it is bat**** crazy stuff), or are you going to keep harping on the Clintons’ charity, which does great work and which has received donations from all kinds of people from all across the political spectrum?

On a related note, I saw this morning in The Hill – in a supposedly “straight news” article no less – the offhand comment by the “reporter” that “In a general election, some of Sanders’s views might doom him.” Uhhhhh….what “views” does Sanders hold, exactly – strengthening America’s social safety net? protecting the environment? – that would “doom him” in a general election, and how is this factual information to put into a news article. More to the point, how is it that the “views” of Republicans like Jeb Bush, such as denying/minimizing climate science or calling it “arrogant” for climate scientists to come to scientific conclusions about their reams of data, don’t “doom” them? But holding totally mainstream, majority views like Bernie Sanders does (I challenge you to find an issue where he’s out of the mainstream) “dooms” him?  WTF?

BREAKING: Senators Kaine, Warner Vote to Move Ahead on “Fast Track” Trade Authority

4

A few minutes ago, the U.S. Senate voted to advance Trade Promotion Authority legislation (aka, “Fast Track”), which President Obama had lobbied hard for, on a 62-38 vote, with Senators Kaine and Warner both voting to proceed with the legislation. Thoughts?

Time for Virginia Dems to Follow California Dem Party’s Lead, Call for Fossil Fuel Divestment ASAP

2

A few weeks ago, Terry McAuliffe was actually arguing that he has no leadership role to play on whether “the state of Virginia and its retirement fund and other relevant funds should divest from fossil fuel companies.” McAuliffe’s pathetically weak answer:

No! I think they have to make the decision what is in the best interest of whatever they’re making their investments; they have a fiduciary duty to make those investments. And clearly as governor I am not going to sit here and tell the people who manage these funds what to do — not my role. And I clearly understand my role…Jeff, it is not my job to come in and tell our businesses what to do. I am a fiscally conservative, pro-business Democrat; I am socially very progressive…

As I said at the time, that was wrong on almost any level you consider it, not to mention a pathetic abdication of leadership. Now, the largest (by far) state Democratic Party has shown what its state’s governor has shown — real leadership on the most important issue facing humanity, that being climate change. Check this out.

At the California Democratic Party convention this weekend, state party officials voted to adopt an official resolution endorsing fossil fuel divestment. Citing the growing threat posed by climate change, the resolution urges the state’s public universities and pension funds to divest their financial holdings from the top 200 fossil fuel companies as part of a comprehensive solution to the climate crisis. The resolution marks the first endorsement for fossil fuel divestment from a state political party, and adds major momentum to the legislative push for S.B. 185, a coal divestment bill. The news also builds pressure on statewide institutions like the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the University of California endowment, who have long faced calls for divestment.

The adopted resolution reads, in part: “[t]he California Democratic Party calls upon the University of California and California State University endowments, the University of California Retirement Plan, and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) institutional pension funds, to immediately stop new investments in fossil fuel companies, to take steps, without risking any financial loss to its members, to divest all holdings from the top 200 fossil fuel companies as determined by the Carbon Underground list within five years, and to release periodic updates to the public, detailing progress made toward full divestment.”

Exactly, the California Democratic Party nails it, as did Gov. Jerry Brown in his powerful “State of the State” address back in January. Now, what about the Democratic Party of Virginia? Gov. McAuliffe? Lt. Governor Northam? Attorney General Herring? Other leaders in our state? When are they going to call for divestment by state pension funds, colleges and universities, etc. from planet-killing fossil fuels? The crisis is urgent, action is required immediately, so what on earth (other than fear of the fossil fuel companies, fossil-fuel-allied utilities, etc.) is stopping them?

P.S. No reason for local parties to wait for DPVA; I also call on Dem committees in Arlington, Alexandria, Fairfax, Prince William, Stafford, Henrico, Loudoun, Virginia Beach, Richmond, Roanoke, Norfolk, Charlottesville, etc, etc. to pass divestment resolutions.

National and Virginia News Headlines: Thursday Morning

12

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Thursday, May 21. And of course, farewell to David Letterman, who I never stay up late enough to watch live, but snippets of whom I get to watch on YouTube. 🙂

*California declares emergency after oil pipeline rupture (As always, fossil fuels are a disaster waiting to happen. Actually, they’re not waiting, as the disaster is happening right now, both off the California coast and in the atmosphere. So much for the brain-dead “all of the above” approach.)

*Big Banks Pay $5.6 Billion, Plead Guilty To Felonies Over Currency And Rate-Fixing (And Republicans want to regulate these crooks LESS?!?)

*U.S. and Cuba Nearing Deal to Fully Restore Diplomatic Ties

*The High Cost of Dirty Fuels (“Ending subsidies for fossil fuels would save many lives, a report from the International Monetary Fund makes clear.”)

*Letterman Goes for Laughs Instead of Tears (“David Letterman signed off on Wednesday with an all-star edition of the ‘Late Show,’ bringing his 33-year career in late-night television to a close.”)

*The Tea Party’s Most Hated Presidential Hopeful? Hint: Not Hillary Clinton (LOL)

*Obama: Climate Deniers in Congress Are Undermining Our Troops (They’re undermining a lot more than our troops, like our entire country and planet.)

*Rand Paul doesn’t know what he’s talking about (“Rand Paul’s playing Jimmy Stewart again, filibustering the Patriot Act. Trouble is, Paul’s opinions are a mess” Like father, like son…and that’s not a good thing in this case!)

*Dave Brat criticized for immigration, Islamic State comment (Basically, almost every time Brat opens his mouth or writes something, the lunacy starts pouring out. The fact that Randlph Macon hired this wacko doesn’t say anything good about that school, that’s for sure. Nor does the fact that 7th CD Republicans elected him.)

*Chasing Gecker (Emily Francis is the obvious choice for Democrats in this primary. Dan Gecker hasn’t supported our last two Democratic presidents, for god’s sake.)

*FOIA Council: No on making open records violations a misdemeanor

*D.C. will use roof gardens – among other things – to clean city waterways (Virgnia cities and counties should be doing the same!)

*Former Virginia lawmaker publicly admits paternity for the first time (Yes, this guy is a slimeball, but why is this story getting more attention than the massive sliminess and corruption among legislators in Richmond?)

*Expect to see more transit-oriented housing in the future (Transit-oriented development “does even more. It benefits the health of residents. And it increases wealth, since owning one car or no car, using transit and driving less lowers household expenses.”)

*Alexandria chooses location for Potomac Yard Metro (“Council members said they expect it to bring 26,000 new jobs, 21,000 new homes and $1.5 billion in new tax revenue over the next 20 or 30 years.”)

*The Fight for the 45th (“Democratic primary candidates vying to replace Delegate Krupicka lay out campaign priorities.”)

*Harper tossed, but Zimmermann and Span keep the Nationals alive

*D.C. area forecast: Rain keeps it cool today but sun-filled weekend finishes summery

Video: President Obama’s Commencement Speech to U.S. Coast Guard Academy Focuses on Climate Change

1

Excellent speech, see the transcript below (bolding added by yours truly). Now, President Obama should follow up by blocking oil drilling off our coasts and in the Arctic.

There are now fewer days to go until the Class of 2015 graduates than – never mind. (Laughter.) There are now zero days until the Class of 2015 graduates. (Applause.)

Thank you, Admiral Zukunft, for your kind introduction and for your leadership of our Coast Guardsmen on all seven continents. Governor Malloy, Secretary Johnson, Ambassador, distinguished guests, faculty and staff, families and friends.

And Admiral Stosz, as you prepare to conclude your time as Superintendent, thank you for your outstanding stewardship of this Academy. You made history as the first woman ever to lead one of our nation’s service academies. (Applause.) And I know you’ll keep making history, because I was proud to nominate you for your third star and as the Coast Guard’s next Deputy Commandant for Mission Support. (Applause.)

It is wonderful to be with all of you here today on this beautiful day. Michelle sends her greetings as well. She is the proud sponsor of the Coast Guard cutter Stratton – which is tough to beat. But as Admiral Zukunft pointed out, both the Coast Guard and I were born on the same day. So I want you all to know, every birthday from now on I will be thinking about the Coast Guard. (Laughter and applause.)

Now, the Coast Guard may be the smallest of our services, but I have to say you may also be the loudest. (Laughter.) Whenever I visit our military bases, there are always lots of soldiers and sailors and airmen and Marines. They make a lot of noise. But wherever I am – across the country or around the world, including Afghanistan – nowhere near an ocean – the most determined cheer from the crowd comes from our proud Coast Guardsmen, because usually there might only be one or two of them. (Laughter.)

As Paul mentioned, in my State of the Union address this year, I mentioned how I’ve seen America at its best when commissioning our new officers, including here in New London. And it’s true, some folks across the country didn’t quite get the reference. One person tweeted that they were pretty sure I just made this up. (Applause.) Then there was one person in town who asked, “Did Obama name drop New London?” So let me do it again. It is a great honor to be back in New London, at the United States Coast Guard Academy – (applause) – to salute the newest ensigns of America’s oldest, continuous maritime service. (Applause.)

Cadets, this is a day to celebrate all that you’ve achieved over these past four years. You have excelled at one of the most selective and rigorous academic institutions in America. You’ve held yourselves to a high code of conduct, proven yourself worthy to be called commissioned officers in the United States Coast Guard.

You pushed yourselves physically – from Swab Summer to beating your officers at basketball and softball and football. (Applause.) You braced up, squared your meals, spent Friday nights waxing the floors – maybe a little “Rodeo Buffing.” (Laughter.) I saw the video. That looks dangerous, by the way. (Laughter.) You made your mark, and you will be remembered. In Chase Hall. In this stadium. And at Hanafin’s and Bulkeley House. (Applause.) Which reminds me, in keeping with longstanding tradition, I hereby absolve all cadets serving restrictions for minor offenses. (Laughter.) Minor offenses.

You came together as one team. We are joined today by Commander Merle Smith – the first African American graduate of this Academy – (applause) – Class of 1966, a decorated Vietnam veteran. His legacy endures in all of you – because the graduating Class of 2015 is the most diverse in Academy history. And you took care of each other, like family. Today we honor the memory of your classmate from the Republic of Georgia, Soso, along with Beso. Their spirits will live on in the partnerships you forge with Coast Guards all over the world.

Today, you take your rightful place in the Long Blue Line. For Marina Stevens and her family, it is a very long line. Where is Marina? Just wave at me real quick. There she is right there. Marina’s dad is Coast Guard civilian. Her mom, Janet, an Academy graduate, was a Coast Guard captain and will pin on Marina’s shoulder boards today. Marina’s grandfather was a Coast Guardsman. Her great-grandfather joined the U.S. Lighthouse Service in 1918. That’s four generations, spanning nearly the entire life of the modern Coast Guard. No wonder she’s named Marina. (Laughter and applause.) It’s in her blood.

And, Cadets, I know that none of you reached this day alone. So join me in giving a huge round of applause to your mentors and your incredible parents and your family members – so many of them, themselves, veterans as well. Please give them a big round of applause. (Applause.)

Class of 2015, I’m here as your Commander-in-Chief, on behalf of the American people, to say thanks to each of you. Thanks for choosing to serve – for stepping up, for giving up the comforts of civilian life, for putting on that uniform. Thank you for the service you are about to render – the life of purpose that you’ve embraced, the risks that you’ve accepted and the sacrifices that you will make.

But I’m not here to just sing your praises. I want to speak to you about what comes next. Soon, you’ll fan out across the Coast Guard and some of you will go to sectors and shore command. Some of you will start your duty aboard cutters. Some of you will start flight training. America needs you. And we need the Coast Guard more than ever.

We need you to safeguard our ports against all threats, including terrorism. We need you to respond in times of disaster or distress and lead your rescue teams as they jump out of perfectly good helicopters. We need you in the Caribbean and Central America, interdicting drugs before they reach our streets and damage our kids. We need you in the Middle East; in the Gulf; alongside our Navy; in places like West Africa, where you helped keep the ports open so that the world could fight a deadly disease. We need you in the Asia Pacific, to help our partners train their own coast guards to uphold maritime security and freedom of navigation in waters vital to our global economy.

These are all demanding missions. The pace of operations is intense. And these are tight fiscal times for all our services, including the Coast Guard. But we are going to keep working to give you the boats and the cutters and the aircraft that you need to complete the missions we ask of you.

We’re moving ahead with new Fast Response Cutters, new Offshore Patrol Cutters. We’re on track to have a full fleet of new National Security Cutters – the most advanced in history. And I’ve made it clear that I will not accept a budget that continues these draconian budget cuts called sequestration, because our nation and our military and our Coast Guard deserve better. (Applause.)

And this brings me to the challenge I want to focus on today – one where our Coast Guardsmen are already on the front lines, and that, perhaps more than any other, will shape your entire careers – and that’s the urgent need to combat and adapt to climate change.

As a nation, we face many challenges, including the grave threat of terrorism. And as Americans, we will always do everything in our power to protect our country. Yet even as we meet threats like terrorism, we cannot, and we must not, ignore a peril that can affect generations.

Now, I know there are still some folks back in Washington who refuse to admit that climate change is real. And on a day like today, it’s hard to get too worried about it. There are folks who will equivocate. They’ll say, “You know, I’m not a scientist.” Well, I’m not either. But the best scientists in the world know that climate change is happening. Our analysts in the intelligence community know climate change is happening. Our military leaders – generals and admirals, active duty and retired – know it’s happening. Our homeland security professionals know it is happening. And our Coast Guard knows it’s happening.

The science is indisputable. The fossil fuels we burn release carbon dioxide, which traps heat. And the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are now higher than they have been in 800,000 years. The planet is getting warmer. Fourteen of the 15 hottest years on record have been in the past 15 years. Last year was the planet’s warmest year ever recorded.

Our scientists at NASA just reported that some of the sea ice around Antarctica is breaking up even faster than expected. The world’s glaciers are melting, pouring new water into the ocean. Over the past century, the world sea level rose by about eight inches. That was in the last century; by the end of this century, it’s projected to rise another one to four feet.

Cadets, the threat of a changing climate cuts to the very core of your service. You’ve been drawn to water – like the poet who wrote, “the heart of the great ocean sends a thrilling pulse through me.” You know the beauty of the sea, but you also know its unforgiving power.

Here at the Academy, climate change – understanding the science and the consequences – is part of the curriculum, and rightly so, because it will affect everything that you do in your careers. Some of you have already served in Alaska and aboard icebreakers, and you know the effects. As America’s Maritime Guardian, you’ve pledged to remain always ready – Semper Paratus – ready for all threats. And climate change is one of those most severe threats.

And this is not just a problem for countries on the coasts, or for certain regions of the world. Climate change will impact every country on the planet. No nation is immune. So I’m here today to say that climate change constitutes a serious threat to global security, an immediate risk to our national security. And make no mistake, it will impact how our military defends our country. And so we need to act – and we need to act now.

After all, isn’t that the true hallmark of leadership? When you’re on deck, standing your watch, you stay vigilant. You plan for every contingency. And if you see storm clouds gathering, or dangerous shoals ahead, you don’t sit back and do nothing. You take action – to protect your ship, to keep your crew safe. Anything less is negligence. It is a dereliction of duty. And so, too, with climate change. Denying it, or refusing to deal with it endangers our national security. It undermines the readiness of our forces.

It’s been said of life on the sea – “the pessimist complains about the wind, the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails.” Cadets, like you, I reject pessimism. We know what we as Americans can achieve when we set ourselves to great endeavors. We are, by nature, optimists – but we’re not blind optimists. We know that wishful thinking in the face of all evidence to the contrary would set us on a course for disaster. If we are to meet this threat of climate change, we must be realists. We have to readjust the sails.

That’s why confronting climate change is now a key pillar of American global leadership. When I meet with leaders around the world, it’s often at the top of our agenda – a core element of our diplomacy. And you are part of the first generation of officers to begin your service in a world where the effects of climate change are so clearly upon us. It will shape how every one of our services plan, operate, train, equip, and protect their infrastructure, their capabilities, today and for the long term. So let me be specific on how your generation will have to lead the way to both prepare ourselves and how to prevent the worst effects in the future.

Around the world, climate change increases the risk of instability and conflict. Rising seas are already swallowing low-lying lands, from Bangladesh to Pacific islands, forcing people from their homes. Caribbean islands and Central American coasts are vulnerable, as well. Globally, we could see a rise in climate change refugees. And I guarantee you the Coast Guard will have to respond. Elsewhere, more intense droughts will exacerbate shortages of water and food, increase competition for resources, and create the potential for mass migrations and new tensions. All of which is why the Pentagon calls climate change a “threat multiplier.”

Understand, climate change did not cause the conflicts we see around the world. Yet what we also know is that severe drought helped to create the instability in Nigeria that was exploited by the terrorist group Boko Haram. It’s now believed that drought and crop failures and high food prices helped fuel the early unrest in Syria, which descended into civil war in the heart of the Middle East. So, increasingly, our military and our combatant commands, our services – including the Coast Guard – will need to factor climate change into plans and operations, because you need to be ready.

Around the world, climate change will mean more extreme storms. No single weather event can be blamed solely on climate change. But Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines gave us a possible glimpse of things to come – one of the worst cyclones ever recorded; thousands killed, many more displaced, billions of dollars in damage, and a massive international relief effort that included the United States military and its Coast Guard. So more extreme storms will mean more humanitarian missions to deliver lifesaving help. Our forces will have to be ready.

As Admiral Zukunft already mentioned, climate change means Arctic sea ice is vanishing faster than ever. By the middle of this century, Arctic summers could be essentially ice free. We’re witnessing the birth of a new ocean – new sea lanes, more shipping, more exploration, more competition for the vast natural resources below.

In Alaska, we have more than 1,000 miles of Arctic coastline. The United States is an Arctic nation, and we have a great interest in making sure that the region is peaceful, that its indigenous people and environment are protected, and that its resources are managed responsibly in partnership with other nations. And that means all of you are going to have to step up – because few know the Arctic better than the U.S. Coast Guard. You’ve operated there across nearly 150 years. And as the Arctic opens, the role that the Coast Guard plays will only grow. I believe that our interests in the Arctic demand that we continue to invest in an enduring Coast Guard icebreaking capacity.

I was proud to nominate your last commandant, Admiral Papp, as our special representative for the Arctic. And as the U.S. chairs the Arctic Council this year, I’m committed to advancing our interests in this critical region because we have to be ready in the Arctic, as well.

Climate change, and especially rising seas, is a threat to our homeland security, our economic infrastructure, the safety and health of the American people. Already, today, in Miami and Charleston, streets now flood at high tide. Along our coasts, thousands of miles of highways and roads, railways, energy facilities are all vulnerable. It’s estimated that a further increase in sea level of just one foot by the end of this century could cost our nation $200 billion.

In New York Harbor, the sea level is already a foot higher than a century ago – which was one of the reasons Superstorm Sandy put so much of lower Manhattan underwater. During Sandy, the Coast Guard mounted a heroic response, along with our National Guard and Reserve. But rising seas and stronger storms will mean more disaster response missions. And we need the Coast Guard to be ready, because you are America’s maritime first responder.

Climate change poses a threat to the readiness of our forces. Many of our military installations are on the coast, including, of course, our Coast Guard stations. Around Norfolk, high tides and storms increasingly flood parts of our Navy base and an airbase. In Alaska, thawing permafrost is damaging military facilities. Out West, deeper droughts and longer wildfires could threaten training areas our troops depend on.

So politicians who say they care about military readiness ought to care about this, as well. Just as we’re helping American communities prepare to deal with the impacts of climate change, we have to help our bases and ports, as well. Not just with stronger seawalls and natural barriers, but with smarter, more resilient infrastructure – because when the seas rise and storms come, we all have to be ready.

Now, everything I’ve discussed with you so far is about preparing for the impacts of climate change. But we need to be honest – such preparation and adaptation alone will not be enough. As men and women in uniform, you know that it can be just as important, if not more important, to prevent threats before they can cause catastrophic harm. And only way – the only way – the world is going to prevent the worst effects of climate change is to slow down the warming of the planet.

Some warming is now inevitable. But there comes a point when the worst effects will be irreversible. And time is running out. And we all know what needs to happen. It’s no secret. The world has to finally start reducing its carbon emissions – now. And that’s why I’ve committed the United States to leading the world on this challenge.

Over the past six years, we’ve done more than ever to reduce harmful emissions, unprecedented investments to cut energy waste in our homes and building, standards to double the fuel efficiency of our vehicles. We’re using more clean energy than ever before – more solar, more wind. It’s all helped us reduce our carbon emissions more than any other advanced nation. And today, we can be proud that our carbon pollution is near its lowest levels in almost two decades. But we’ve got to do more.

So, going forward, I’ve committed to doubling the pace at which we cut carbon pollution. And that means we all have to step up. And it will not be easy. It will require sacrifice, and the politics will be tough. But there is no other way. We have to make our homes and buildings more efficient. We have to invest in more energy research and renewable technologies. We have to move ahead with standards to cut the amount of carbon pollution in our power plants. And working with other nations, we have to achieve a strong global agreement this year to start reducing the total global emission – because every nation must do its part. Every nation.

So this will be tough. But as so often is the case, our men and women in uniform show us the way. They’re used to sacrifice and they are used to doing hard stuff. Class of 2015, you’ve built new equipment that uses less energy. You’ve designed new vessels with fewer harmful emissions. Stephen Horvath, selected as a Fulbright Scholar, will research new technologies for renewable energies. The Coast Guard is building more fuel-efficient cutters. So you’re already leading. And, Cadets, as you go forward, I challenge you to keep imagining and building the new future we need – and make your class motto your life’s work: “To go where few dare.” This is a place where we need you.

Across our military, our bases and ports are using more solar and wind, which helps save money that we can use to improve readiness. The Army is pursuing new, lighter, more fuel-efficient vehicles. The Air Force F-22 broke the sound barrier using biofuels. And the Navy runs an entire carrier strike group – the Green Fleet – with biofuels. Our Marines have deployed to Afghanistan with portable solar panels, lightening their load and reducing dangerous resupply missions. So fighting climate change and using energy wisely also makes our forces more nimble and more ready. And that’s something that should unite us as Americans. This cannot be subject to the usual politics and the usual rhetoric. When storms gather, we get ready.

And I want to leave you with a story that captures the persistence and the patriotism that this work requires, because this is a nation made up of folks who know how to do hard things. Down in the front row is Dr. Olivia Hooker. In 1921, in Tulsa, Oklahoma, when she was just six years old, her African American community was attacked by white mobs – it was a horrific racial incident. And hundreds of innocent African Americans were killed. The mobs destroyed her father’s clothing store. They looted her house. They even burned the little clothes for her doll.

And Olivia could have given in to bitterness. She could have been pessimistic about her country. Instead, she made it better. So in World War II, she enlisted as a SPAR, becoming the first African American woman in the Coast Guard. (Applause.) As a yeoman in Boston, she served with distinction. By the time the war was won, she was discharged, she was a petty officer second class.

With the GI Bill, Olivia earned her master’s, then her doctorate. She has been a professor and mentor to her students, a passionate advocate for Americans with disabilities, a psychologist counseling young children, a caregiver at the height of the AIDS epidemic, a tireless voice for justice and equality. A few months ago, Olivia turned 100 years old. (Applause.)

So, Olivia, you’re going to have to tell us you’re secret. She’s still as sharp as they come, and as fearless. (Applause.)

In Yonkers, New York, she even still volunteers as a member of the Coast Guard Auxiliary, and was determined to be here with us today.

So, Dr. Hooker, thank you. You’re an inspiration. (Applause.) One hundred years old.

So Dr. Hooker has led a remarkable life. But this is what she says – “It’s not about you, or me. It’s about what we can give to this world.”

Cadets, you’re at the start of your careers. And we cannot know, each of us, how many days we will walk this Earth. We can’t guarantee we’re all going to live to 100. But what we can do is live each day to its fullest. What we can do is look squarely at what will make the biggest difference for future generations and be willing to tackle those challenges.

And as you embark on your life of service, as you man your stations, and head to the seas, and take to the skies, should the sea begin to surge and the waves swell and the wind blows hard against your face, I want you to think back to this moment – to feel what you feel in your hearts today. And if you remember all that you’ve learned here on the Thames – how you came here and came together, out of many one, to achieve as a team what you could never do alone – if you resolve to stay worthy of traditions that endure – honor, respect, devotion to duty – if you heed the wisdom and humility of a petty officer second class from Oklahoma, to think not of yourself, but what you can give to this world – then I’m confident that you will truly go where few dare. And you will rise to meet the challenges that not only face our country, but face our planet. And your legacy will be a nation that is stronger and safer for generations to come.

So, Class of 2015 – thank you for your service. Congratulations. God bless you. God bless all our Coast Guardsmen. God bless our United States of America.

ALEC’s Threatened SLAPP Suit Against the LCV: Another Part of the Assault on Our Democracy

0

( – promoted by lowkell)

Some thoughts about the press release that my wife, April Moore, put out earlier this week. In it, she challenged her opponent – Virginia State Senator (and apparent would-be-Virginia’s Scott Walker), Mark Obenshain – to condemn the suit threatened by corporate powerhouse ALEC against the League of Conservation Voters.  

ALEC’s attempt to intimidate the LCV represents should be understood as part of the larger picture of how the Big Money Power is subverting American democracy.

This particular abuse of money power is not directly connected with the electoral process. Rather it is an attempt of Big Money to strangle the public discourse on which a healthy democracy depends, the flow of information and ideas that helps the American people give informed consent to their government.

Bringing such a suit – or even just threatening it – represents a serious abuse of the legal system to silence those people who are doing for the nation precisely what our founders had in mind when they constructed the American system of liberty: telling the public the truth about what’s going on.

This kind of abuse of the legal system has a name: SLAPP, Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation.

Although America’s founders set up the court system as a means for achieving justice, in suits like this, that purpose is turned on its head. “Justice for all” is what is implied by the blindfold that Lady Justice wears. When Justice weighs the facts and the law in its scales, it is blind to who is powerful and who is weak. Thus the Courts are supposed to be the one place – besides also the ballot box – where the weak have equal standing.

A SLAPP suit works to bring inequality of power to bear even in that legal system. Because it takes money to conduct a protracted legal struggle, the Big Money Power can defeat – through a war of attrition — those who lack such deep pockets who would stand up against it.

This perversion of our fundamental democratic values is part of the same picture as the buying of elections. ALEC’s effort to intimidate the League of Conservation Voters should be seen as part of the same pattern of plutocratic abuses as the Citizens United decision, voter suppression, and the propaganda work of Fox News et al. by which the Big Money Power drives millions of our countrymen into fear and confusion and misunderstanding.

As bad as all SLAPP suits are, this one — even the threat of this one — is particularly egregious. For it is on the subject of climate change that ALEC is seeking to silence its critics. Not, of course, by cleaning up its own act, but by intimidating those who are calling out their dirty ways. Nowhere is the darkness of this destructive force on the right more evident than in its willingness to sacrifice the most vital needs of our children and grandchildren for its own short-term enrichment.

(This is the force that is the focus in my forthcoming book What We’re Up Against: The Destructive Force at Work in Our World– and How We Can Defeat It.)

April’s campaign against Mark Obenshain is a clear microcosm of the large battle that we must fight and win. April Moore is running to restore power to the people, and Mark Obenshain has a record of being an apparently willing servant of the Big Money force that is destroying government for and by the people. (Mr. Obenshain has introduced ALEC’s bills into the legislature, he’s received a $60,000 campaign contribution from the Koch Brothers, he’s done the bidding of Dominion Power.)

It will be interesting to see how Senator Obenshain responds to this challenge. Will he meet the challenge, and denounce the corporate power that seems to have picked him to be their guy (perhaps in the Virginia Governor’s mansion)? Or will he hold fast to that allegiance, and bring into clearer public view his service to Big Money in its degradation of the gift of democracy that our founders bequeathed to us?

National and Virginia News Headlines: Wednesday Morning

6

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Wednesday, May 20. Also, check out the video of this past weekend’s debate for the Democratic nomination in the Mt. Vernon (Fairfax) Magisterial District Supervisor’s race. The candidates are Jack Dobbyn, Tim Sargeant, Dan Storck and Candice Bennett.

*In Coast Guard commencement, Obama to link climate change to national security

*After media drought, Hillary Clinton takes some questions in Iowa

*Hillary Clinton on her emails: I want them out, too!

*George W. Bush’s CIA Briefer: Bush and Cheney Falsely Presented WMD Intelligence to Public (“On ‘Hardball,’ Michael Morell concedes the Bush administration misled the nation into the Iraq War.”)

*Record-High 60% of Americans Support Same-Sex Marriage

*David Brooks Tries To Rewrite History Of The Iraq War

*Why We Should Spend Billions More On Trains

*Start over force authorization? No, say Kaine and Rigell, stop stalling, start debating

*An opportunity for Virginia to earn a reputation for energy efficiency

*DOE: Bigger Turbines Could Unlock Wind Energy Potential In All 50 States (Hello Dominion, are you reading stuff like this?!?)

*Schapiro: Governor looking at judicial trifecta?

*Another wasted election (“The November elections are still six months away, but we can already predict who the loser will be: you. All 140 seats of the General Assembly are, in theory, up for grabs. But except for a few districts that will see a competitive race, the outcome is already ordained.”)

*Businesses hedging their bets with political donations

*UVa rector won’t seek another term on board of visitors

*UVa board extends president’s contract at least two years

*At Christopher Newport University, a pitch for more state building money

*Expect more flooding and erosion, study says

*Arlington police officer responding to domestic dispute fatally shoots man

*Democrats seeking Prince William Senate seat debate in Woodbridge

*Widening I-66 to Ease Traffic Causes Concerns for Some Northern Virginia Residents (As always, widening roads is not the answer; smart growth and transit are.)

*Arlington board majority asks football team to change Redskins name (Not that Dan Snyder gives a crap.)

*Zimmerman’s blast lifts Nats over Yankees in 10th

*D.C. area forecast: Sunny, cooler and drier through Sunday, except for Thursday cloud and shower threat

Video: Debate for the Virginia 29th Senate District Democratic Primary (5/18/15)

0

I strongly support Atif Qarni for this nomination (the primary is on June 9; don’t forget to vote!), but I honestly think that all three candidates did fine in this debate. The main differences between the candidates, I’d say, are on: 1) electability (I’d argue that the teacher and former U.S. Marine – Atif Qarni – who lives in Manassas would be the best Democratic candidate/best bio of these three to take on Republican Hal Parrish in the general election); and 2) their main areas of emphasis (Qarni’s is clearly education and on putting a teacher in the State Senate). Finally, great job by Potomac Local in hosting this debate and making the video available for all of us to watch – thanks!

P.S. I’d add that on ethics reform, Atif Qarni had the strongest answer (no gifts whatsoever for members of the General Assembly), Jeremy McPike second (the problem being his own ethics “issues” that Hal Parrish and the Republicans will certainly remind voters about if McPike is the nominee), and Michael Futrell third (not even sure he answered the question the first shot at it).

Caldwell Bolts Party, Files in 21st District

11

I knew the Republicans would make a strong effort to unseat State Sen. John Edwards of Roanoke this year, mainly because he and Del. Sam Rasoul are the only Democrats remaining in the General Assembly from southwest Virginia. That part of the state is so Republican now that Edwards’ seat, in a district that still leans Democratic, was one of their best shots at unseating a Democratic incumbent. However, the greatest threat to Edwards now is coming from a completely unexpected source, Don Caldwell, commonwealth’s attorney for Roanoke City. Don has always run as a Democrat and even chaired the city Democratic committee until a few years ago. Now, he has filed papers to run in November as an independent against Edwards and his Republican opponent, Nancy Dye.

Dye is well-funded and is certain to welcome Caldwell’s entry into the race if he does go through with his plans to run. As Carter Turner, chair of the Roanoke County Democratic Committee said recently in the Roanoke Times,  “I think John’s got his hands full even if Don doesn’t run. Dye’s got literally some of the best people in the industry doing stuff for her. I think she’s formidable.”

All I can figure is that Caldwell, who has been commonwealth’s attorney for more than 30 years as a Democratic office holder, was hoping that John Edwards would retire this year. When Edwards didn’t, Caldwell decided to morph into an independent. He’s bidding to become the spoiler in a three-way race, someone who is willing to turn his back on the party that supported him all those years.

Caldwell’s justification to the Roanoke Times was that he wanted to “get away from the dogma of both parties and get back to serving the reasonable people on both sides.” He didn’t elaborate on exactly what Democratic “dogma” has driven him to become an independent after decades of being quite happy to run on that same dogma as a Democrat in a city that is a Democratic stronghold. Since about 40% of the district is the city of Roanoke, Caldwell could simply think he can somehow corral 33% plus 1 and win. The probable outcome of his independent candidacy, however, is that he might peel off just enough votes from Edwards to throw the election to Dye.

Edwards had better campaign like this is life or death for his political career because it is. Otherwise, the 21th senate district may well find itself with a self-described “Reagan conservative” as its senate representative. I say that because the two main candidates in the race, Edwards and Dye, will spend upwards of $1 million on the race. I foresee Caldwell being underfunded but taking just enough votes to help Dye along in her quest.

Dye is a retired physician who has railed against the mythical “war on coal” and who does not support the expansion of Medicaid, or the Affordable Care Act. She has never held elective office.

Let’s see…How do you spell “turncoat”? Doesn’t it start with “C”?

Rep. Connolly to EPA: Treating bioenergy as carbon neutral may undermine the Clean Power Plan

0

Rep. Gerry Connolly nails it. The bottom line: we need to be massively REforesting, not burning forest for fuel!

May 19, 2015

The Honorable Gina McCarthy

Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Ariel Rios Building

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20460

Dear Administrator McCarthy,

Thank you for your leadership and continued efforts to finalize the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan. As a strong supporter of this plan, I believe you have laid forth a forward-thinking, flexible, and attainable approach to reducing our nation’s carbon footprint. I appreciate your willingness throughout this process to consider public feedback on the draft plan and trust the final plan you develop will establish our country as a global leader on climate change.

I write to share my concern with the EPA’s draft proposal to treat waste-derived feedstocks and non-waste biogenic feedstocks derived from sustainable forest or agricultural practices as having zero emissions. As you know, following EPA Assistant Administrator McCabe’s November 2014 memorandum, there has been considerable debate regarding this decision, including questions surrounding the science behind it, and the perception that this decision will result in the unsustainable promotion of forest harvesting for energy production.

For example, in a February 9, 2015, letter to the EPA, more than 70 scientists highlight their concerns with this decision, including their view that it would actually increase emissions. They state, “Burning biomass instead of fossil fuels does not reduce the carbon emitted by power plants…ln fact, burning biomass degrades facility efficiency and increases day-to-day emissions over emissions when fossil fuels are burned alone.”

They go on to point out that “burning biomass that would otherwise continue to absorb and store carbon capture comes at the expense of reduced carbon storage.” In fact, numerous studies have found that it takes decades of forest regeneration to offset these emissions.

Furthermore, decisions we make domestically will unquestionably have an impact on the global community. For example, in advance of the upcoming United Nations Climate Conference in Paris, the U.S. has entered into important carbon emission reduction agreements with both China and India. We must be mindful that the EPA’s accounting rule pertaining to biomass could be applied globally and have a significant impact on decisions related to our world’s forests. According to the International Energy Agency, treating bioenergy as carbon free globally, coupled with strong carbon policies, would lead to reliance on woody biomass for 6% of electricity by 2035, and require more than doubling global commercial timber harvest.

As the McCabe Memo correctly notes, “The President’s Climate Action Plan highlights the critical role that America’s forests play in addressing carbon pollution in the United States by removing nearly 12 percent of the total U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions each year from the atmosphere.” However, I worry the decision to treat biomass as carbon-neutral may have unintended consequences that could actually undermine and inhibit our ability to reduce carbon emissions.

I understand the Scientific Advisory Board Biogenic Carbon Emissions Panel is still reviewing the Framework for Assessing Biogenic CO2 Emissions from Stationary Sources. Until this review is finalized, I believe it is premature to classify biomass as a carbon-neutral compliance method under the Clean Power Plan. I thank you for taking these concerns under review.

Sincerely,

Gerald E. Connolly

Member of Congress