Home Blog Page 2337

An Ugly Intrusion of Republicanness into My 50th High School Reunion

7

The main event of our Reunion was a big banquet, which consisted mostly of wonderful schmooze time and dining time. Then came the program time, which I found less wonderful because of what our MC threw in.

The MC was our class president. He’d been our class’s most outstanding athlete, and he stood out also back in the day for driving a fancy Chrysler 300 to school. He has a reputation for being a pretty good guy.  And he’s also a Republican.

That Republican bit should be irrelevant.  Had I been the MC, it surely would have been irrelevant to the job I’d have done that I’ve spent my last nine years alarmed and disgusted by what the Republican Party has become.  I’d have figured that that had nothing to do with what brought us classmates together, a half century after graduation.  I’d have thought it contrary to our feel-good purposes to intrude any views of mine on matters that divide us.

But as it turned out, it wasn’t irrelevant.  For whatever reason, our star quarterback thought himself entitled to compel us all to join him in his brand of patriotism. It’s a brand I recognize, and it’s not one I like.

He did it in three distinct moves, over about a fifteen minute period, mixed in with thanks to the rest of the reunion committee, a bit of reminiscence, and a series of jokes (with a misogynistic theme running through them).

The first move was to make the declaration, with no particular context, that “we live in the greatest country in the history of the world.”  It’s a statement that was truer the day we marched out of the gymnasium to “Pomp and Circumstance” than it is now. But one then less frequently announced.  

Since then, while we continue to lead the world in military spending and power, and have surged to a lead in percentage of our people behind bars, our nation has fallen well back in the standings in various measures of human well-being-like in health, life expectancy, infant mortality, educational achievement, and social mobility.

The kicker is this:  the same Republican force that’s pumped up the “We’re # 1” mentality has been key to making our country notably less great by the values both of our founders and our religious traditions.

Our class president’s remark connected into all that chest-thumping, jingoistic sense of national superiority that our most recent Republican president used in order to get and maintain support for the kinds of aggressive American policies that made our traditional friends abroad fear and distrust us.

His next move, a while later, was to ask for all our classmates who’d served in the American armed forces to stand up and to tell the rest of us to applaud them.  I appreciate people’s service in the military, and I know that some of these guys from the class of ’63 put their lives on the line forty-some years ago.  But did this gesture toward the military have a place in our event?  

And, so many years later, and with people now at the age of retirement from long careers, is the service and sacrifice of soldiers the only kind worthy of appreciation?  

What about the teachers in the room, who worked long hours for not much pay out of devotion to their students?  And doctors and nurses, working hard to cure the sick?  And what about my friend Marv, sitting at our table, who’d brought integrity and sagacity to a domain of the law, helping thereby to make our society a bit more just and more sane?  

This extraneous call for us to applaud our soldiers, and only our soldiers, also rang a familiar note:  the militarization of virtue, promoted by that same Republican presidency, as a way of making our raw power the definition of our national greatness, as well as putting the misguided wars of choice beyond challenge by tying them to “our heroes” in uniform.  

Finally, as our MC was about to wrap things up, he called upon us all to stand and recite — as I do not recall our doing during our years together in high school – the “Pledge of Allegiance” to the flag.  I used to have fond feelings for the American flag, but in our times it’s become so completely connected with the kind of patriotism that’s been called “the last refuge of scoundrels” that it’ll be quite a while before I can see it again as standing for the Republic that offers “liberty and justice for all.”  

As a candidate for Congress, I refused to be one of those politicians who have been intimidated by this ugly form of patriotism into wearing a flag pin, or using the flag in my campaign hand-outs.  I preferred to talk about the values that animated our Founders.  Not the tarnished symbol, but the living substance.

Any one of these gestures, I might have overlooked.  But together, they form a pattern.  At some level our master of ceremonies must have known that he was pushing onto all of us a position on a matter of political controversy in our country. This pattern, after all, takes clear sides in what was one of the chief recent political battle lines in America.

This is a pattern we’ve seen before at important moments of the history of the past century:  the sense of superiority, the militarism, and the idolatry over the flag.  We’ve seen it in our own recent history, and we’ve seen it in chapters of the history of other nations.

They are always dark chapters.

Our reunion did not need that ugly bit of contemporary Republicanness intruding into our event.

Virginia 2009 vs. Virginia 2013: Where Have All the Polls Gone?

8

I’ve noticed for a while that it seems like there have been very few polls of the Virginia governor’s race this cycle, but I had’t really looked into it. Until this morning, when I decided to check Real Clear Politics and see if my gut feeling was correct. Well, yes, it was. So far this summer (since June 1), these are the polls of the Virginia governor’s race.

*Quinnipiac (8/14-8/19) 48%-42% McAuliffe +6

*Quinnipiac (7/11-7/15) 43%-39% McAuliffe +4

*Roanoke College (7/8-7/14) 33%-39% Cuccinelli +6

*PPP (7/11 – 7/14) 41%-37% McAuliffe +4

*Rasmussen Reports (6/5-6/6) 44%-41% McAuliffe +3

That’s five polls of the Virginia governor’s race since the end of May 2013, with four showing McAuliffe ahead, and one not being a serious poll (NOT because it has Cuccinelli ahead, but because it’s been a piece of crap for years now).

In comparison, here are the polls from 2009:

*Washington Post (8/11-8/14) 54%-39% McDonnell +15

*Rasmussen (8/10-8/10) 49%-41% McDonnell +8

*Daily Kos/R2000 (8/3-8/5) 51%-43% McDonnell +8

*PPP (7/31-8/3) 51%-37% McDonnell +14

*SurveyUSA (7/27-7/28) 55%-40% McDonnell +15

*Rasmussen (7/14-7/14) 44%-41% McDonnell +3

*PPP (6/30-7/2) 49%-43% McDonnell +6

*Daily Kos/R2000 (6/15-6/17) 45%-44% McDonnell +1

*Rasmussen (6/10-6/10) 41%-47% Deeds +6

*SurveyUSA (6/5 – 6/7) 47%-43% McDonnell +4

*Daily Kos/R2000 (6/1-6/3) 46%-34% McDonnell +12

That makes 11 polls in 2009 from June 1 through August 23 (McDonnell led all of them except for, ironically, the most pro-Republican one, Rasmussen).

So…in 2009 there were twice as many Virginia Governor polls from June 1 until now as in 2013. It’s weird, because if anything you’d think it would be the opposite, as 2009 was a blowout and 2013 is a much closer, more interesting race. What happened?

I’m not totally sure, but a few things jump out:

 1) the Daily Kos/”Research 2000″ polling partnership died a nasty death (lawsuit settled in 2011); 2) SurveyUSA seems to have largely disappeared, for whatever reason; and 3) Rasmussen has been less active this year (note that Scott Rasmussen just left Rasmusssen Research to become a GOP pundit, which is what he should have been all along!). In addition, this year isn’t a “Tea Party wave” year, and I’ve always felt that the media drove the Tea Party phenomenon. This year, maybe the media’s bored, even with a Tea Party candidate (Ken Cuccinelli) at the top of the Virginia Republican ticket, and two just-as-extreme-if-not-more-extreme candidates (EW Jackson and Mark Obenshain) down ballot from him? Also, I wonder if the polling industry in general has pulled back a bit after 2012, when there was so much controversy over likely voter models, supposedly “skewed” polls (there was never any evidence of “skewing” against Republicans; that was all another right-wingnut fever dream)? Hard to say.

Whatever the reason, we’ve had less than half the polls of the Virginia governor’s race from June 1 to August 23, 2013 compared to the same period in 2009. Of the polls we HAVE had, the trends in the two cycles are wildly different: in 2009, consistent leads for McDonnell from start to finish (with that one weird outlier of Rasmussen on 6/10/09, right after Deeds secured the Democratic nomination); in 2013, every reputable poll (and again – nope, Roanoke College polls are not reputable) has had McAuliffe leading Cuccinelli, albeit not by large margins.

Anyway, we’ll see if there’s a flood of polls after Labor Day. Last cycle, there were a whopping 29(!) public polls from 9/1/09 until the election.  I’d be shocked if we match that this cycle, but we’ll see soon enough…

Poll Shocker: McDonnell Comeback Possible, Prosecutor’s Risk Backlash?

0

by Paul Goldman

“Call the grave diggers. We may have buried a guy whose still alive” is my take on the latest polling numbers showing Virginians have not joined the mainstream media mob who have decided to hang Governor McDonnell BEFORE the trial, indeed before there is any hard evidence that he is going to be indicted by state or federal authorities. Despite 4 months of relentless, unprecedented “he’s a crook” front page coverage led by the Amazon.com Post, His Excellency, our “gifted governor” has polling numbers a lot better than a goodly number of other Governors even in more Republican states. As the saying goes: Who would have thunk it?

Just when Dexter, the character in the Dexter HBO series, had McDonnell wrapped up and on the execution table, the script changed, or at least the Director cried “STOP!”. To be sure, this could only be like the scene in the movie The Perfect Storm, when the doomed passengers on the boat get a few hours of reprieve as they sailed into the calm eye of the great hurricane. Eventually, the giant waves and fierce winds surrounding their unreal zone of safety will reappear, leaving them no place to hide.

BUT let’s assume the Virginia newspaper posse is wrong, let’s assume after all these months of front page leaks and the latest editorials calling on him to RESIGN are wrong: let’s assume that Jonnie The Rat Williams is NOT believed by the federal prosecutors, let’s assume the prosecutors decide that McDonnell is telling the truth, that he might be a lot of things a Governor shouldn’t be, but not “a crook” as Nixon would have put it.

As I have written in this space – a lonely voice I might add – the law requires our  “gifted Governor” and his “gifted wife” be given the benefit of the doubt. The usual rule in the South is this: if it quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it’s got to be Duck Dynasty don’t it?

But let’s assume – and let’s insist really – that if the prosecutors aren’t absolutely sure they have “their man”, then as the saying goes: If the facts don’t quite fit, then the prosecutors have to acquit.

Okay: That’s not quite the quip, but it’s close enough for government work in this case.

The polls don’t lie: Right now, knowing what they know, the people of Virginia aren’t demanding McDonnell resign, stand trial for criminal charges, or do anything but finish out what they still see as a positive 4 years at the Governor’s Mansion.

“Hell with the newspaper editorial writers and muckrakers!” say the people of Virginia. They seem willing – except for diehard Democrats and your died-in-the-wool “plague on both your houses” independents – to give His Excellency a second chance if the federal grand jury disbands without putting the Governor’s name on any piece of official paper. They may wrong but this is the majority view.

You read about people suddenly coming alive on the operating table, even supposedly after being tagged at the morgue: but not any who apparently buried alive at the local political graveyard beneath six feet of solid news print.

Does this mean Virginians have a high tolerance for bad gubernatorial behavior, or a low tolerance for a political lynch mob?

Neither really. But it does tell me this: McDonnell has made a big political mistake in not (1) making a better public Mea Culpa, (2) making a better public case for his being dumb but not corrupt and (3) failing to call a Special Session showing he has learned from his mistake and will use that experience to make sure it can never happen again. Had he done all three things, his positive ratings would likely be a lot higher: and the prosecutors would face a lot harder decision.

That’s right: one thing the prosecutors have been considering for weeks now is whether there will be a public backlash to their calling McDonnell a “crook” in so many words, or in using his wife’s blind ambition to force the Governor into taking a plea and resigning.

It has been a public hanging by the media: and thus it will be a public spectacle whatever the prosecutors decide to do. Right now, as indicated, the court of public opinion isn’t in a hanging mode. Again, you or I might a different view. But that’s a separate issue.

The reason for the polling numbers seems plain enough: The public at large isn’t convinced  what he is being accused of doing is so far different from the political norm to warrant criminal sanctions.

There is only one way to prove them wrong: he would have to be indicted, and then convicted by a jury of his peers. In that period, McDonnell would be forced to turn his Republican guns on the Democratic prosecutors, fair or not.

Based on the polling data, this scenario is possible: Most Republicans and a majority of independents might be convinced, in terms of the court of public opinion, that the DOJ of a Democratic Administration played a little politics with the claim of criminal conduct on the part of the GUV and possibly the First Lady.

The DOJ fear: Given the ethical rules once an indictment is issue, this could turn ugly as McDonnell’s lawyers start talking to the jury poll while the DOJ has to remain silent in relative comparison.

Why not therefore let the constitution of Virginia take its normal course, McDonnell will be gone in a few months anyway, why take the risk of a big public blow-up in the middle of a GUV race over what the people right now see as a personal failing, not a gubernatorial crime that has affected his performance in office?

But you say” “Paul, it is clear the public isn’t really informed, hasn’t been following the facts, when they learn the truth, the public will get outraged.”

My comeback: “I tend to give the public far more credit.”

Let’s cut to the chase: As I have written, I am not a big fan of what I will call this “Jonnie The Rat” case, where a sleazy business guy like Williams – based on what we know – gets to say “trust me prosecutors” on my ratting out the Governor for making secret illegal promises to me. It may be prosecutors have a lot stronger case, and one suspects they surely have good reason to think so sans Mr. Williams.

BUT: In the end, they don’t have a smoking gun is my guess. There was clearly more going around in the dark than Santa Claus when Mr. Williams was checking his gift list before dropping down the chimney of the Governor’s Mansion. Yet that being said: As I have written, Governors do favors for their friends and in our culture, friends tend to be $friends, like it or not, we need to be adults here.

I am not condoning it: but I refuse to be a hypocrite either just to nail a Republican Governor who I didn’t vote for [didn’t vote for him for AG either.]

Bottom line: Call me old fashioned, call me “a rebel, call me what you will” as the famous song goes, I would rather see 100 guilty men go free than convict one innocent man. And “innocent” in our culture, in our law, is someone who gets the benefit of a reasonable doubt.

That’s my take on the latest poll numbers: The court of public opinion is prepared to give their Governor a chance at redemption having now given his accusers all these months to make their case, legal, political, ethical and otherwise.

Should the prosecutors listen? Ideally no, but practically is another vital question. In my view, the better result in terms of what is good for the state would be to let the Governor off the hook IF he would agree to call a Special Session, fight for real ethics reform, and appoint a Governor’s Commission to study our laws to make sure we aren’t sending innocent people to jail or keeping them there due to things we need to change including a system which forces people to take pleas to things they didn’t do because fighting for the truth has become too costly or risky.

We call this “rough justice.” This is not a bad result at all when you are essentially dealing with a “political offense” in the main part. Real corruption over the years has always included actions by Governors that were far more serious and directly monied corrupt than what we have here.

This is not to condone it: but it is to say that if the price for “rough justice” for the many is to give Governor McDonnell  the benefit of the doubt, then 20 years from now, the interests of the state will have been far better served and the outcome far better for the greater good.

I read the polls as saying this: If the prosecutors are willing to accept this kind of “rough justice”, the public is “down” with that, and in that regard, it presents an opportunity to address far more series criminal justice issues than could otherwise be addressed right now in our political culture.

Virginia News Headlines: Friday Morning

9

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, August 23. Also check out President Obama speaking about “his plan to make college more affordable, tackle rising costs, and improve value for students and their families.”

*Justice Department sues Texas over voter ID law (Excellent. Next lawsuit: against North Carolina.)

*U.S. Officials Are Weighing Response to Assault in Syria (I’m really thinking we need to respond forcefully to the use of chemical weapons against civilians by the Syrian government. It’s wildly unacceptable behavior, and if we allow it to go unpunished, I fear we’re setting a very dangerous precedent for the future regarding WMD use.)

*Congressman Peddles Conspiracy Theory On Climate Change: Only ‘Radical Environmentalists’ Get Grants (More evidence that there’s something seriously, seriously wrong with Republicans these days.)

*Boehner ups the ante for a budget showdown in September (And more evidence…)

*No, Chris Lane is not Trayvon Martin! (“If you want to actually understand race relations in this country, you need to understand the difference between these cases. But the right prefers to live behind a veil of intentional ignorance where the only kind of racism that exists today is black people disliking white people.”)

*GOP unhinged on Obamacare (“There is no chance the Senate or Obama would defund the act, yet Republicans keep trying.” They are suffering from a severe, possibly terminal, case of “Obama Derangement Syndrome.”)

*Galuszka: Virginia’s problem goes beyond McDonnell

*U.S. attorney investigating McDonnell to leave office as probe heats up (I agree with Galuszka that we need strong,systemic ethics reform in Virginia. I also agree that the Richmond Times-Dispatch, aka Republican Times-Disgrace, has its head firmly embedded in its butt.)

*Poll reports McDonnell’s honesty an issue for many

*Today’s top opinion: Back to health (I agree that Virginia needs tax reform desperately, but I strongly doubt I agree with the Republican Times-Disgrace on what that reform should look like…)

*Changing Demographics in Virginia Are Making Republicans Nervous (As well they should be…)

*Demographic Shifts May Help Virginia Democrats (Not one but TWO articles on Virginia’s changing demographics today. Sensing a theme here?)

*Why So Serious? (“Political idealism is a great principle but when faced with Ken Cuccinelli vs. Terry McAuliffe, realism takes precedence.” Bingo!)

*Terry McAuliffe Calls for Stiffer Drunk Driving, Domestic Violence Enforcement

*Election 2013: Attorney Gen. Democratic Candidate Mark Herring ‘Deeply Disturbed’ With Ken Cuccinelli and Opponent Mark Obenshain

*Will this be on the SOLs? (“In Virginia’s high-stakes testing climate, drills could be killing the desire to learn. It’s worth a review.”)

*Sen. Mark Warner meets with Roanoke rail workers to talk gridlock (My god, the false equivalency, b.s. “both sides” shtick is out of control! Can someone please explain to me why Mark Warner is Virginia’s most popular politician, as measured by public opinion polls? Ugh.)

*Federal cuts threaten team dealing with dolphin crisis (The type of harm the sequester is doing. Stupid, stupid, stupid.)

*In New Spot, Cuccinelli Tosses GOP Gov Under Bus (He can try to do that, but as Bob Lewis points out in his article, “Cuccinelli…received $18,000 from Williams and his company” as well. Plus, there’s Cuccinelli’s CONSOL corruption.)

*50 years after King speech, Norfolk marchers remember living “Dream”

*Stirring the student vote (“Virginia Tech students have too much at stake to sit out off-year elections.”)

*George Washington National Forest plan delayed

*Seven Fairfax high schools will ban sugary sodas from machines (Excellent move, every other school system should do this too!)

*Henrico School Board will not extend Russo’s contract

*D.C. area forecast: Front heads south today, making weekend weather hard to pass up!

*After near-win, Nationals rally to beat Cubs 5-4 in marathon 13-inning game (“Strasburg’s blown three run lead in the 9th inning was yet another of the season’s missed opportunities.”)

Video: Ken Cuccinelli Dodges 76-Year-Old Southwest VA Landowner’s CONSOL Questions

1



According to the video description, “Ken Cuccinelli spins and passes the blame when addressing the investigation surrounding his office and its involvement with an out-of-state energy company.” Also, the 76-year-old landowner “traveled five hours to make the 7 a.m. event” to ask her question, only to have Cuccinelli dodge and lie (e.g., that the gas companies – CONSOL, for instance – somehow were unhappy with him; then why have they donated thousands of dollars to his campaign?). #FAIL all around by “Corrupt Ken” (most definitely not “Frugal Ken,” as he ridiculously calls himself) CONSOLnelli!

Bob Filner and the Brain-Dead, Drooling Idiocy of Ken Cuccinelli’s Campaign

6

Yesterday, Dave Weigel marveled in Slate at how “The Cuccinelli Campaign Is Really Trying to Link Terry McAuliffe to Bob Filner.”

Ken Cuccinelli’s campaign is trolling Terry McAuliffe pretty hard. Anyone following the Virginia governor’s race knows that Cuccinelli’s campaign is zealous in sending out torrents of email blasts. Most of the emails criticize Terry McAuliffe for his failed electric car startup or his prominent (and, as Mark Leibovich writes in This Town, perpetually flaunted) connections to the Clinton family.

But two recent emails-titled “What values?” and “Break His Silence”-forge a new path in oppo research by trying to link McAuliffe to San Diego Mayor Bob Filner. McAuliffe’s crime of omission: not calling for Filner to resign over his spate of sexual harassment accusations…

If this is not THE STUPIDEST attack in Virginia political history, I’d love to hear examples of attacks that were “more stupider,” as the expression goes. Let us count the levels of brain-dead, drooling idiocy here (note :you can see Cuccinelli’s latest email in the comments section):

1) the Bob Filner situation has absolutely nothing to do with Virginia;

2) Terry McAuliffe has absolutelynothing to do with Bob Filner (who just announced he’s resigning, by the way – by Cuckoo’s “logic,” should T-Mac get credit? LOL);

3) this whole line of attack opens Cuccinelli up to demands that he denounce every crazy, bigoted, extremist nutjob Republican out there, from Steve King to EW Jackson to a gazillion others.

Of course, in Cuccinelli’s case, he’s actually on the same ticket with an extremist/bigot/nutjob (actually two, but for some reason people are giving Mark Obenshain a pass). And in Cuccinelli’s case, he’s actually stated that he thinks Steve King’s a great Congressman. We could go on and on; the point is, Cuccinelli not only doesn’t condemn the hateful, ignorant, divisive, extreme rhetoric and actions by his political allies and contributors (e.g., the Koch brothers are two of the most evil people in America), he doubles down on his ties with these people. By his own “Bob Filner” standard (I was about to call it “logic,” but it’s too stupid to be logical in any way) shouldn’t Democrats be able to pound him on anything and everything those people say and do? Should Cuccinelli be held responsible for every (insane/hateful) word uttered by EW Jackson, by the right-wing propagandists on Faux “News” or on “Red State” or whatever? If not, why not?

P.S. All I have to say to Filner’s resignation is “good riddance scumbag!”

P.P.S. The Crazy Cooch folks are now somehow trying to pressure McAuliffe into condemning Anthony Weiner. Basically, what they’re arguing is that Terry McAuliffe is now personally responsible for anything done by any Democrat anywhere in America, and must spend his days and nights tracking them down and condemning them. Same standard for Cuckoo and the huge stable of loony-tune Republicans out there? Nah!!!

Video: SWVA Landowner Rips Cuccinelli for Helping Out-of-State Energy Companies Screw Him Over

2



“Ken Osborne, a Southwest Virginia landowner, who is fighting against Ken Cuccinelli and out-of-state energy companies over royalties owed for gas extracted from his property. Recently, a federal judge said she was “shocked” by the help Attorney General Cuccinelli’s office was giving two out-of-state energy companies in their fight against Virginia landowners like Ken Osborne. Cuccinelli even took more than $100,000 in donations to his gubernatorial campaign from the company he was helping.”

Virginia Lt. Gubernatorial Candidate Debate at GMU Arlington on 9/24

0

This should certainly be entertaining! LOL. Seriously, though, come and support Virginia's next Lt. Governor, Ralph Northam, against extremist/bigot EW Jackson. Click on the link below to reserve your seat now!

 

 

Virginia Lt. Gubernatorial Candidate Debate 

at George Mason University's Arlington CampusTuesday, September 24, 7:00-8:30 PM 

           

  Virginia Lt. Gubernatorial Candidates Republican E.W. Jackson

(pictured at left) and Democrat State Senator Ralph Northam.

 

George Mason University's School of Public Policy and State & Local Government Leadership Center along with Mason Votes are proud to host

Lieutenant Gubernatorial candidates Republican E.W. Jackson and

Democrat State Senator Ralph Northam as they debate

 

The Fiscal Future of Virginia

 

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

7:00 – 8:30 PM

(Doors open at 6:30 PM)
Founders Hall Auditorium – Arlington Campus

3351 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201

 

Moderator: Peggy Fox, WUSA Channel 9


 

This event is free with advance reservation. Seating is limited.

Click here to reserve your seat.

 

Map. MetroDriving directions.

 

 

More Q-Poll Results: Virginia Loves Warner, Kaine, Clinton; McDonnell Not So Much

1

More results from the Quinnipiac poll of Virginia are trickling out. A few highlights.

*Virginians love Senators Warner and Kaine: “U.S. Sen. Mark Warner gets a 61-25 percent job approval rating, with a 55-32 percent score for Sen. Tim Kaine.”

*Virginians love Hillary Clinton: “Looking ahead to the 2016 presidential campaign, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continues to be the apple of Virginia voters’ eyes, leading New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie 46-37 percent…Clinton crushes Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas 53-34 percent.” Run Ted Run! 🙂

*Virginians are not too thrilled with Bob McDonnell at this point: Although “Voters still approve 47-39 percent of the job Gov. Bob McDonnell is doing…[he] gets a split 34-35 percent favorability rating.” Meh. Although I must say, I’m not really seeing how these numbers are bad enough to be a significant drag on Ken Kookinelli. Instead, I’d say Cuckoo’s losing this race all by himself, by being a) corrupt; b) a sex-obsessed (and not in a good way) freak; and c) an all-around extremist on a ticket with fellow extremists EW Jackson (who Cuccinelli has said he strongly supports) and Mark Obenshain (who put in a bill to make miscarriages a CRIME!).

VA Tech Study: Latino/White/Black Kids Suffer ED/Health Issues Due to Aging Schools

0

(Of course, I’d point out to my friend Paul that Ken Cuccinelli would decimate public school (and health care, etc.) funding in Virginia and severely harm Latino/White/Black kids education, health, etc. – promoted by lowkell)

By Paul Goldman

[Of course, my friend Lowell doesn’t mention  the “bipartisan transportation package” took $2-3 Billion originally available for K-12 education and now requires it to be spent for roads. It is easy to go with the “money”, choose real estate developers over poor kids. So in 2013 parlance, you can either take the Paul Goldman approach for helping poor kids be all they can be or the Boyd Marcus approach, it is your choice. Throwing stones is easy, as some Jewish guy pointed out 2000 years ago. But the record is clear as to which approach has actually meant progress for people in this state, there are any number of books which have examined the record on that score, if there is any doubt.] In a new study – actually, it isn’t a new study in terms of when it was done, but “new” in terms of it first being read closely by me last night after speaking with the author – the leading expert in the country shows that kids going to aging school facilities ARE DEFINITELY hurt in terms of both education and HEALTH due to their going to these obsolete, out of date K-12 school buildings. Ironically, the leading expert in this field teaches at Virginia Tech University! That’s right, here in the Commonwealth, another of our unused assets, a brilliant mind waiting to have insights used to benefit all of us.  

The Professor’s name is Glen Earthman. I talked with him on the telephone yesterday; nice guy, friendly, and smart. He did a big study for the Maryland Task Force on School Facilities that is available online. So are various other studies he references and also some doctoral stuff done by Virginia Tech students on the issue.

Bottom line: The statistical evidence is clear, there is a definite connection – not for all students of course but for most of us normative types – between he condition of a school building in key areas and both the education performance and health of children, especially those vulnerable to such things.

Virginia has many of these old and aging schools, and schools in deteriorating conditions. They are everywhere, rich areas, poor areas, middle class areas although they are more prevalent of course in some rather than other such circumstances.

BUT BOTTOM LINE: With test scores falling in many places like Richmond, indeed with only 1 in 4 students tested ready for college as required(!), everything that is contributing to poor student performance needs at least to be understood and reflected upon. The correlation between old buildings, health and education – and a kid in bad health is not likely to be able to learn as required – is not only clear, but it is clear in so many ways that are obvious but yet we miss them very often.

 

THUS: The bipartisan push to eliminate the glitch in federal law that is MAKING IT WAY MORE COSTLY THAN NECESSARY to fix these schools conditions. Ken Cuccinelli and I, Terry McAuliffe and I, have held numerous joint public appearances on the subject collectively, although not all three of us in the same place at the same time.

According to the Professor’s studies, the elimination of this glitch, along with a few other tweaks to the law, would make it a lot easier for local and state officials to figure out a sustainable plan to modernize these schools within the financial resources of the localities who have to approve the projects.

It is part of why taking $2-$3 billion from monies that could have otherwise gone to schools, and instead using that money to help real estate developers with their road needs as was in the McDonnell transportation plan should bother advocates for these children as a priority issue, an urgent priority issue.  The evidence thus accumulates further. As Bob Dylan wrote: “How many times can a man turn his head and pretend he just doesn’t see?”

As Professor Earthman discusses, the Education and health problems which aging school conditions increase last and thus grow more damaging over one’s lifetime. Thus, the cost to society IS HUGE, and yet so easily preventable by just allowing the free market to do what it can do and has been proven to do as Senator Kaine pointed out: fixing old schools would be far cheaper to localities if the IRS “prior use” rule is eliminated for public school projects as it is for private and other projects, schools, office buildings, condos.

Since Cuccinelli and McAuliffe, Cantor and Kaine, Warner and McDonnell, all agree, as does the President and Mitt Romney: what’s not to like politically at least? Professor Earthman has been discussing this angle of the issue for years but his voice has not been sufficiently heard in my view. Moreover, the health connection to student learning – a huge issue – has likewise not been sufficiently discussed nor understood.

MOREOVER: According to the Rutgers and VCU studies, the use of historic tax credits to finance projects is a big net positive to the country  and the nation’s finances, as it eliminates huge amounts of federally subsidized debt, which in the long run is far costlier. Plus, current method has self evidentially not fixed these old schools – President’s Bush, Clinton and Obama have made this point in their own way – and it is hurting millions of kids.

Net, Net: Latino, white, black, Asian, it is the color of money – not skin color – that is holding our children back. The use of historic tax credits pays for itself, it makes no policy sense to allow a tax break for turning a school into an luxury condo, but not for turning the same school with the same money into a 21st-century public school building so these kids can get a true 21st-century education.

AND FINALLY: As the President has said, this is not about politics. Indeed, to allow politics to kill this change, to stop people from working on it, is a national shame.