Home Blog Page 3314

What Next, Jack Abramoff to Run Virginia’s Prisons?

2

And in his latest stand for good government, Bob McDonnell appoints a Goldman Sachs croney (Diana Cantor, wife of Rep. Eric Cantor) to chair the Virginia pension system.  This move comes after McDonnell appointed a state pension defrauder to chair the government reform commission.

Sadly, this latest news is not a shocker. Maybe next McDonnell will ask a felon – Jack Abramoff’s available, I hear! – to run the prisons? Whoops, better not give him any ideas!

Jim Webb Speaks to Arlington JJ Dinner Attendees

0



Sen. Jim Webb speaks to the VIP reception prior to the Arlington County Democratic Committee’s Jefferson Jackson Dinner last night in Ballston. Webb speaks about the pressing need for criminal justice reform, about Arlington County being a “flagship” for the state, about the GI Bill helping a “half a million” veterans, and about how his visit to Thailand “broke my heart.”

P.S. Listening to Jim Webb reminds me that Susan Mariner, who is up for election as DPVA 1st Vice Chair today, was one of the superstars of the 2006 Webb campaign.  Go Susan!  

UPDATE: Also, thanks to Arlington County Democratic Committee Precinct Operations Chair Kip Malinosky, who I spoke with at the Arlington JJ Dinner last night, for his endorsement of Susan for DPVA 1st Vice Chair!

Ward Armstrong Tells His Dog Joke at Arlington County JJ Dinner

0

Very funny, as you can see. Also, see more of Armstrong’s speech below, including the beginning where he praises freshman Del. Patrick Hope (D-Arlington).

Arlington Jefferson-Jackson Dinner VIP Reception: Photos

1

Here are a few photos from tonight’s Arlington County Democratic Committee Jefferson-Jackson Dinner. I’ll upload some video as well, including House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong’s well-received speech.



UPDATE: More photos from the JJ Dinner, courtesy of Kenton Ngo, are available here.













My Two Cents: It is Not a “Spill,” But Rather a Massive Assault on America

4

Please, let us stop using the word “spill,” a PR term.  It’s not a spill. Ironically, we continue to fund wars of choice propping up big oil, such as BP, in far away lands (and maybe, almost incidentally, round up a few terrorists here and there), when big oil has committed what could be called a terrorist-like assault on our country.  

I do not suggest that BP did this on purpose, though its behavior was purposeful negligence.  Apparently, BP also allegedly engaged in purposeful lying to regulators.  And BP was purposefully reckless and cavalier in the aftermath. Where the administration is concerned, I do not suggest that extensive person hours haven’t been spent by this administration.  They have, from the beginning.  Nor do I suggest that the administration doesn’t care about what is happening.  I think the president has gotten a bad (and very unfair) rap on that.  However, the president has more on his plate than finding the right “ass to kick.”  (I must confess, I hope he does that, through the DoJ.)  

What is needed is a massive re-organization of our national priorities. Given the extensiveness and seriousness of what we face in the Gulf, and potentially up the Atlantic Coast, we must consider some outside-the-box thoughts:

In his journal, David Swanson points out the various things Charlottesville Virginia could fund with the money that small city provides in taxes for the wars.


69,579 People Receiving Low-Income Healthcare for One Year OR

5,871 Police or Sheriff’s Patrol Officers for One Year OR

6,435 Firefighters for One Year OR

36,411 Scholarships for University Students for One Year OR

64,764 Students receiving Pell Grants of $5550 OR

125,637 Children Receiving Low-Income Healthcare for One Year OR

47,424 Head Start Slots for Children for One Year OR

63,840 Households with Renewable Electricity – Solar Photovoltaic for One Year OR

5,055 Elementary School Teachers for One Year OR

170,241 Households with Renewable Electricity-Wind Power for One Year

OR we could defend against the incompetent, negligent contemptuous company, which is essentially “terrorizing” nearly half of this nation even as I write this.

The very same folks (notably John Boehner and the increasingly radical cons he represents), who want the taxpayers to pick up the tab, will squak the loudest if we should re-assess, re-think, and re-prioritize what our nation does.  Yet, what is the point of defending “freedom” (as if that is what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan–in fact the so-called war on terrorism strips us of such)* in far-away lands, when we are fast facing a degraded homeland? If the gusher continues, the distribution of this massive assault via Atlantic currents jeopardizes much more than the eastern US. (Glibly, BP suggests it’ll all be a wash in the Atlantic.)

If environmental degradation were “all that would result,” that would be bad enough. When all is done, unfortunately, the massive assault on our country is likely to cost more lives than the eleven already lost.  If the massive assault on America reaches up the eastern seaboard, an even larger portion of our food supply (the Gulf provides 19% of our fish and seafood) is and will be contaminated.  The massive assault on America will cost billions. And there is no end in sight.  

in the Gulf, there has been only one tanker sucking up the oil. BP has called for a second!  Recall that decades ago when a large gusher threatened waters near Saudi Arabia, every available ship was dispatched to help remove the oil. Meanwhile, we allowed BP to widely disperse the oil making it more difficult to actually remove the massive assault from the environment and rendering the substance even more toxic than it already was.  The dispersant also had the “benefit” of sending the oil deeper beneath the surface, so the massive assault looks less threatening from the air. Of course, enter the airspace to cover the massive assault at your own risk.  BP doesn’t allow it.  As the video of Orange Beach, AL, shows, the threat is real. When will our government, and the pols in both parties enabling it, shift our priorities where they should be: Real homeland defense?

____

* Note: When the radical cons use this term, they really mean the “freedom” to submit to their so-called leadership (which is really about power); the “freedom” to follow their notion of Jesus as explicated by right-wing pastors; and the “freedom” to be conservatives just like them (and nothing else). Of course freedom has nothing to do with any of the above.  Demanding submission gives them away.

**As always, My Two Cents reflects only the opinion of the writer and not anyone else associated with BV.

Susan Mariner for 1st Vice Chair of DPVA

9

With the DPVA’s central committee set to meet tomorrow and vote on who is to be the next 1st Vice Chair of the organization, bloggers across Virginia are posting their closing arguments in favor of their favorite.  The Richmonder supports Susan Mariner for 1st Vice Chair of the Democratic Party of Virginia.  Susan has displayed tremendous commitment to growing the Democratic Party of Virginia.  She has the right skills to grow and unify the party going forward.

Susan Mariner has shown the energy needed to fight for all Democrats in every race.  I first met Susan during the Webb campaign in 2006.  Jim Webb’s campaign for the U.S. Senate was far from a sure thing, but Susan was tireless in her support.  It was the commitment of people like Susan that positioned Jim Webb to take advantage when George Allen’s campaign fell apart in August 2006.

The post of 1st Vice Chair is charged with growing the Democratic Party of Virginia.  You can’t do that by focusing just on the easy races.  Susan has shown that she will take on the longshot campaigns that produce upset victories.  Susan has shown that she can work within the Democratic establishment in Virginia while, at the same time, reaching out to new and growing constituencies.

When I decided to support Susan Mariner for the post of 1st Vice Chair of DPVA I also made the decision not to engage in any negative campaigning.  I do not know Gaylene Kanoyton, but from everything I have heard about her she seems to be a perfectly decent person and qualified for the position.  I simply believe from past experience that Susan Mariner is the superior candidate for the position.

What I do find myself compelled to criticize is the element of race that has been injected into this competition by some of Gaylene’s supporters.  I have no reason to believe that Gaylene approves of these arguments made on her behalf, so I would ask my readers not to hold them against Gaylene personally.  

The element of race I am referring to is the idea that the post of 1st Vice Chair is “set aside” or “reserved” for a black woman.  I have searched the DPVA party plan in vain for such a rule, yet there are those who seem to believe it exists.

Consider:

Any discussion of change has to take a look at the issue of race. The tradition of having the #2 person in the DPVA (and the vice mayor of Norfolk, I might add) being black is troublesome to me on many levels. On the one hand, it says that blacks will always be second-best, not good enough to be #1. That hurts more than any non-black person can imagine.

On the other hand, it is a recognition of how far blacks in Virginia have come and how much we are valued by the party and not just as a reliable voting bloc. Somewhere, some new activist in the party can look to the#2 person in the party and find someone that looks like them.

Do I wish race weren’t an issue? You betcha [smiley face winking].  But that’s like wishing race wasn’t an issue in almost everything. I do, but it is.

This example is from Vivian Paige, someone who I respect and esteem, but who I think is wrong on this issue.  I would note that in Vivian’s original post, there is an actual “emoticon” of a smiley face winking at the reader.  It’s hard not to conclude that Vivian is arguing that wink-wink there is an unwritten rule reserving this position for a black woman and that’s just how it is.  

Sometimes we want something so badly that it clouds our judgement and we make arguments in support of our position that really aren’t defensible.  I think Vivian and the other people who are making this argument have fallen into that trap.  I don’t think this is something to wink-wink at.  

I understand that race is an issue and I appreciate the need for diversity in any organization, but most especially a statewide Democratic committee.  But I think that the issue of diversity must be addressed by looking at the committee in its totality.  There should be no individual seat or position reserved for anyone based on race, sex, orientation, or religion.  Individual candidates for any single position should be judged as individuals based on the needs of that position and the individual talents of the individuals applying for that position.  I am disappointed that this is a position that I need to take and defend so explicitly.

I hope that the members of the DPVA central committee will look at the duties of the 1st Vice Chair position and what it will take to succeed in that position and then closely examine the qualifications and achievements of the individuals applying for the job before they pick the best person for the job.

I wish Susan and Gaylene the best tomorrow and I look forward to working with both of them on future campaigns regardless of the outcome of tomorrow’s race.

Show your support for Susan Mariner by joining her Facebook fan page.  You can read Susan’s “Why I am running for DPVA 1st Vice Chair of Organization” at Blue Virginia.

The Winds of Change

1

Last week, I wrote about how the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico should remind us of the ultimately unsustainable cost of our addiction to fossil fuels. This week, I’d like to share my thoughts on a recent development with one of the most promising alternatives to fossil fuels: wind power.

The barriers to harnessing the power of wind energy are not technological – they are primarily political. We have had wind power generation capabilities for years, but our leaders haven’t been active enough about setting standards for the adoption of renewable energy, investing in a transmission grid to deliver power from generation sites to consumers, or creating a consistent and reliable regulatory framework.  

An outdated transmission system is one of the primary reasons why alternative energies only meet a small portion of our national energy demand. A recent study released by The American Wind Energy Association estimated that wind projects capable of generating a total of 200,000 megawatts of power are ready, but cannot connect to the grid because we lack the capacity to transmit the energy they would generate to consumers. 200,000 MW of wind power – that’s enough to meet more than 20% of our national energy needs, and we haven’t built the lines to access it. Supporting infrastructure development is among the most important of the government’s responsibilities. We have the opportunity to secure our future. Will we take it?

I was pleased to hear earlier this week that Governor McDonnell has joined Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar and the governors of 10 other eastern states to form the Atlantic Offshore Energy Consortium. According to the Richmond Times-Dispatch,

the Consortium would “review investment and infrastructure, data and science, and the regulatory and permitting process” in an attempt to coordinate efforts to use the tremendous wind power waiting off the Atlantic Coast.

Governor McDonnell is starting to show some meaningful support for wind power. That’s great.

Although he appears to be interested in the energy of the future, Governor McDonnell still places distressing focus on the energy of the past. Expressing support for an expensive drilling project last month, the Governor said,

“It is my hope that the President’s action does not signal the end of offshore energy exploration and production off Virginia in the years ahead.”

Drilling off Virginia’s coast would be expensive. It is unlikely to provide any revenue for Virginia. Most estimates agree that oil reserves off Virginia’s coast are only sufficient to supply enough oil to supply the United States’ needs for three days.  In short, it is a distraction from the pursuit of long-term energy solutions.

The formation of a green energy commission doesn’t do much good if it’s not followed by concrete action. I hope that we can count on the Governor to take leadership of this important initiative. For the time being, all of us can hope that his commitment to green energy will be more than just words.

I wish we could count on Rep. Frank Wolf’s backing for this important and bipartisan initiative. After all, Rep. Wolf claims support for renewable energy initiatives:

“I continue to support alternative and renewable energy initiatives as part of a comprehensive energy policy.”

Sadly, his legislative record suggests otherwise. Rep. Wolf voted for the final version of the Energy Independence Security Act of 2007, but only after he voted against provisions that raised renewable energy standards and supported investments in green energy. In 2008, he voted against a budget that invested $7.7 billion in funding for alternative energies.

That’s a disappointing record.  

Frank Wolf’s support for green energy has been primarily rhetorical. When I get to Congress, my support will be real. I will be a force for the full funding of alternative energies in Congress, and I will be a powerful advocate for the 10th District. As one of the hotbeds of innovation in the region, our District must play an important role in providing the ideas and the technology that will drive the next generation of energy.

The next time Rep. Wolf thinks about voting against funding for clean energy, the next time he thinks the status quo is acceptable, I hope he takes a look at what’s happening on the floor of the Gulf right now.

Wind power is available. It’s clean. It’s renewable. It’s safe. We can’t afford to wait any longer to harness its potential.

Virginia Republicans on Robert Hurt

1



With friends like this, Robert Hurt doesn’t need enemies.