Home Blog Page 3329

Michael Steele: African Americans “don’t have a reason” to Vote Republican

3

RNC Chairman Michael Steele tells us something we’ve known for several years now.  Better late than never, I guess.

Why should an African-American vote Republican?

“You really don’t have a reason to, to be honest – we haven’t done a very good job of really giving you one. True? True,” Republican National Chairman Michael Steele told 200 DePaul University students Tuesday night. […]

“For the last 40-plus years we had a ‘Southern Strategy’ that alienated many minority voters by focusing on the white male vote in the South. Well, guess what happened in 1992, folks, ‘Bubba’ went back home to the Democratic Party and voted for Bill Clinton.”

Thank you, Michael Steele, for stating the obvious and acting like it’s a great revelation!

P.S. A few more groups of people who should never vote Republican: women, GLBT folks, Hispanics, religious minorities (including atheists and non-religious people), teachers, police officers, government employees and contractors, scientists, anyone who needs health care, anyone who cares about the planet (including hunters, anglers, etc.), anyone who’s not in the top 1% in terms of wealth, anyone who lives in a city, etc., etc.  I wonder if Michael Steele will admit it.

Fun Times In Loudoun County With Eugene Delgaudio

0

Another instant classic from the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, once again involving the infamous homophobic bigot (and all-around lunatic) Eugene Delgaudio. Watch for yourself, starting around 1:56 of the video and particularly at 1:59-2:01.  Fun times.

…Delgaudio attacked Miller for making the proposal and for not being business friendly. Changing the subject, he then accused Miller and his family of leading an effort to disparage him.

[…]

On Tuesday, Delgaudio hinted at the episode and started to mention “Miller’s family,” when Miller lunged for his microphone to interrupt.

“You are done speaking for me,” Miller shot. “I will speak for myself, sir!”

“You’ve made me mad in the past,” Miller continued. “But this is the first time you made me mad in public,” before adding, “Keep it up and you’ll regret it!”

Delgaudio quieted his stance. “Great, I’m the one that gets laughed at on Comedy Central,” he responded, before the matter moved on to another supervisor.

By the way, I couldn’t embed this video, but you can click on the image above and it will take you to the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors website, where you can view it.

UPDATE: Liz Miller weighs in.

A Few Words About Rwanda

4

By Borderjumpers.org, a blog by Danielle Nierenberg and Bernard Pollack

We’ve taken some long bus rides in Africa. We spent eight bumpy hours on a bus from Nairobi to Arusha and another eight from Arusha to Dar Es Salaam. The longest so far, though, has been from Kampala, Uganda to Kigali, Rwanda.

Once we finally arrived, we quickly realized, that we’ve never traveled anywhere quite like Rwanda.

Fifteen years ago one of the largest modern genocides occurred here.

Our visit to the genocide memorial museum in Kigali, was a painful reminder to us that, as Jews, our shared global commitment of “never again” was just words. More than 1 million men, women, and children were senselessly murdered, not by strangers, but by their own government, their own neighbors, and in some cases, their own family members.

Today in Rwanda, it’s clear that the country and communities are creating spaces for healing. Radio, print, and TV are filled with multi-ethnic dialogues about renewing and rebuilding Rwanda. Communities are holding public forums, counseling is offered, and dialogue is growing everywhere.

We also found a country bustling with energy as it rebuilds. Traveling in the countryside we saw many success stories, including the work of Heifer International Rwanda which is training farmers and increasing food security. “Heifer is helping a recovery process,” explained Dr. Dennis Karamuzi, a veterinarian and the Programs Manager for Heifer.

Heifer began working in Rwanda in 2000, but their start was a little rocky. At first the community was suspicious of the group-because they were giving farmers “very expensive cows,” says Holimdintwoli Cyprien, one of the farmers trained by Heifer to raise dairy cows; they didn’t understand how the group could just give them away. But as people began seeing the results of Heifer’s training, they become less suspicious and more interested in working with the group.

We were very inspired as we met with several farmers all over the countryside, who were lifting themselves out of poverty using help provided to them by Heifer. Several of the farmers became teachers in their own communities, helping their neighbors learn new skills and techniques that they were benefiting from, and working with them to implement them.

Rwanda may be our most interesting and beautiful visit in Africa but the country also feels lost, still struggling to find itself, still deciding what direction it will go. Its wounds may never completely heal-especially when “never again” happened here such a short time ago.

If you enjoy our weekly diary we invite you to get involved:

1. Comment on our posts — we check for comments everyday and want to have a regular ongoing discussion with you.

2. Receive regular updates–Join the weekly BorderJumpers newsletter by clicking here.

3. Help keep our research going–If you know of any great projects or contacts in West Africa please connect us connect us by emailing, commenting or sending us a message on facebook.

Virginians: McDonnell/Bolling/Cuccinelli Wrong on Climate & Energy

0

Projected Virginia Temperature RiseHow else to read this new poll (PDF) from Christopher Newport University?

First, let’s establish one thing: Virginia’s government is doing nothing to address global warming. That’s not me talking — that’s what a Virginia Department of Environmental Quality spokesman told the Newport News Daily Press. No, wait — that’s not quite right. Virginia is actively trying to obstruct action on global warming thanks to the war on science led by Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli & supported by Gov. Bob McDonnell & Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling.

Meanwhile, last month was the hottest March on record globally & broke a record for lack of cold locally. That’s after 2009 was the 2nd-hottest year on record & the 2000s were the hottest decade on record. Oh, and remember the “oil crisis” in the 1970s? We import twice as much oil today as we did then.

The poll shows Virginians explicitly reject the McDonnell/Bolling/Cuccinelli clean energy & climate obstruction in three key areas:

  • Virginians want state government to act, not obstruct. 78% agree “Virginia’s government has to create policies that could address the issue of climate change and improve the state’s environment.”
  • It doesn’t matter if they don’t buy the science. 91% agree “regardless of whether there is or isn’t climate change, it is still in Virginia’s best interest to develop new sources of energy that are cleaner, reliable, affordable, and safer.”
  • Virginians are willing to pay a little more for clean energy. 81% agree “slightly higher energy costs today are worth the investment if they lead to energy that is cleaner, reliable, affordable, and safer down the road.”

Oh, and the winter snowstorms that the Virginia GOP & Ken Cuccinelli said were proof global warming isn’t happening? Only 5% of Virginia voters agree. Instead, 28% say the freakishly strong storms made them more concerned about climate change.

Overall? Only 38% give Virginia’s environment an A or a B. That’s down sharply from 45% just last year.

I’d say there was a huge opportunity for Virginia Democrats to go after McDonnell/Bolling/Cuccinelli & establish clear contrast in the eyes of voters. But from state-level candidates like Tim Kaine, Creigh Deeds & Jody Wagner to Senators Mark Warner & Jim Webb, Virginia Democrats seem to prefer instead to listen to Republican positions promoting polluting fuels & say “me, too!”

To get clear contrast, you have to go to the regional level —  House members like Tom Perriello, Jim Moran & Gerry Connolly, State Senators like Chap Peterson &  Donald McEachin, or Delegates like Albert Pollard, Scott Surovell, Adam Ebbin & David Englin.

As Virginia Democrats plot strategy for 2010, 2011 & beyond, can they develop a statewide strategy for taking advantage of this opening — the gaping canyon between voters’ support for a new direction on clean energy & climate action and GOP candidates’ obstruction to progress & shilling for polluting fuels?  

Virginians: McDonnell/Bolling/Cuccinelli Wrong on Climate & Energy

57

Projected Virginia Temperature RiseHow else to read this new poll (PDF) from Christopher Newport University?

First, let’s establish one thing: Virginia’s government is doing nothing to address global warming. That’s not me talking — that’s what a Virginia Department of Environmental Quality spokesman told the Newport News Daily Press. No, wait — that’s not quite right. Virginia is actively trying to obstruct action on global warming thanks to the war on science led by Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli & supported by Gov. Bob McDonnell & Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling.

Meanwhile, last month was the hottest March on record globally & broke a record for lack of cold locally. That’s after 2009 was the 2nd-hottest year on record & the 2000s were the hottest decade on record. Oh, and remember the “oil crisis” in the 1970s? We import twice as much oil today as we did then.

The poll shows Virginians explicitly reject the McDonnell/Bolling/Cuccinelli clean energy & climate obstruction in three key areas:

  • Virginians want state government to act, not obstruct. 78% agree “Virginia’s government has to create policies that could address the issue of climate change and improve the state’s environment.”
  • It doesn’t matter if they don’t buy the science. 91% agree “regardless of whether there is or isn’t climate change, it is still in Virginia’s best interest to develop new sources of energy that are cleaner, reliable, affordable, and safer.”
  • Virginians are willing to pay a little more for clean energy. 81% agree “slightly higher energy costs today are worth the investment if they lead to energy that is cleaner, reliable, affordable, and safer down the road.”

Oh, and the winter snowstorms that the Virginia GOP & Ken Cuccinelli said were proof global warming isn’t happening? Only 5% of Virginia voters agree. Instead, 28% say the freakishly strong storms made them more concerned about climate change.

Overall? Only 38% give Virginia’s environment an A or a B. That’s down sharply from 45% just last year.

I’d say there was a huge opportunity for Virginia Democrats to go after McDonnell/Bolling/Cuccinelli & establish clear contrast in the eyes of voters. But from state-level candidates like Tim Kaine, Creigh Deeds & Jody Wagner to Senators Mark Warner & Jim Webb, Virginia Democrats seem to prefer instead to listen to Republican positions promoting polluting fuels & say “me, too!”

To get clear contrast, you have to go to the regional level —  House members like Tom Perriello, Jim Moran & Gerry Connolly, State Senators like Chap Peterson &  Donald McEachin, or Delegates like Albert Pollard, Scott Surovell, Adam Ebbin & David Englin.

As Virginia Democrats plot strategy for 2010, 2011 & beyond, can they develop a statewide strategy for taking advantage of this opening — the gaping canyon between voters’ support for a new direction on clean energy & climate action and GOP candidates’ obstruction to progress & shilling for polluting fuels?  

Poll: Virginians Say McDonnell/Bolling/Cuccinelli Wrong on Climate & Energy

0

Last month was the hottest March on record globally. Here in the mid-Atlantic, a winter that was slightly cooler than normal was followed by a March that broke a record for lack of cold.

http://cpp.cnu.edu/pdf/FinalTo…

38% give it A or B, down from 45% last year.

Only 5% say less 28% say more

81% agree “Slightly higher energy costs today are worth the investment if they lead to energy that is cleaner, reliable, affordable, and safer down the road.”

91% agree “Regardless of whether there is or isn’t climate change, it is still in Virginia’s best interest to develop new sources of energy that are cleaner, reliable, affordable, and safer.”

78% agree “Virginia’s government has to create policies that could address the issue of climate change and improve the state’s environment?”

Republicans Shout Down Discussion of VAT

35

Recently, we’ve seen a lot of fulmination over a suggestion by former Fed Chairman (under both the Carter and Reagan administrations) Paul Volcker regarding the so-called “Value Added Tax” (VAT). According to Volcker, a VAT is an option that might be considered to close this country’s structural budget deficits. In brief, here’s the argument for a VAT tax.

Economists across the political spectrum argue that a VAT, which taxes spending rather than income, should at least be on the table when a commission appointed by Obama meets next week to craft a plan to reduce soaring budget deficits. Providing federal support to a vast wave of retiring baby boomers is almost certain to require higher taxes, budget experts say, and a VAT would be efficient and easy to collect and could raise significant revenue without imposing additional taxes on earnings.

Whatever your view of this argument, you’d think that an intelligent, serious, open, adult discussion of a VAT might be in the cards, particularly in light of this nation’s severe, long-term, structural budget deficit problem, and particularly in light of the fact that economists “across the political spectrum” think it’s an idea worth considering.

Well, think again.

…last week, in a tax-day speech on the Senate floor, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) accused the Obama administration of having “floated the idea of” a VAT and called on his Senate colleagues to go “on record on this onerous new tax.”

Eighty-five senators voted for McCain’s amendment, which declared the VAT “a massive tax increase that will cripple families on fixed income and only further push back America’s economic recovery.”

Amazingly, 13 (courageous? foolish? both?) Senators actually voted “no” on McCain’s demagoguery.  Among those was our own Jim Webb, who has now come under attack – completely predictable, of course – by Virginia Republicans. According to RPV Chairman Pat Mullins, Jim Webb should “denounce” the VAT, which Mullins oh-so-subtly calls a “$1 trillion burden onto the backs of taxpayers.” Mullins also claims, implausibly, that “Webb put the wishes of his political party ahead of the people who sent him to Washington.”

I say “implausibly” because the Obama Administration has publicly ruled out a VAT, and because the vast majority of Senate Democrats voted for John McCain’s anti-VAT resolution. So, how is Webb, who took the politically courageous stand on this issue, putting the “wishes of his political party” ahead of anyone? As usual, the RPV makes no sense, beyond ratcheting up anger and generally foaming at the mouth.

In short, what we have here is yet more evidence that the RPV’s position on fiscal matters is completely non-serious.  Thus, the RPV rants that deficits – which, they conveniently ignore, skyrocketed under George W. Bush and a Republican Congress – are out of control, while taking every conceivable option to fix those deficits off the table, a priori. Sweet.

Unfortunately, what’s not so sweet is that our nation is facing severe fiscal challenges: an aging population, rapidly rising entitlement spending (Social Security and Medicare), but no political will to pay for any of it.  Here’s how a nonpartisan expert explains the sorry situation.

“We’re taking all the feasible, non-disastrous ways of dealing with our budget problems off the table,” said Leonard Burman, former director of the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, who now teaches at Syracuse University. “We can’t cut Medicare. We can’t enact a VAT. We can’t raise any income taxes ever, except possibly on the 17 people who make over $1 billion a year.”

“Behind closed doors, almost everyone serious in Washington understands there’s a big problem,” Burman said. “But in public, basically if you say anything intelligent, you’re killed.”

Cue the Republicans, shouting down the mere thought of a “tax” of any kind, whether it’s on “value added,” energy, carbon, or anything else. In fairness, cue the Democrats to shout down any cuts to “entitlements.” The end result: stalemate, drift, deficits as far as the eye can see, and eventually a disastrous fiscal crisis facing our country. Sadly, that’s the state of our political system in the year 2010.

State and national Republican legislative idiocy

0

This will be short.  I do not consider it sweet.

In Virginia, the Governor can propose amendments to legislation as part of his vetoing or approving a bill and returning it to the veto session of the General Assembly.  Gov. McDonnell has proposed requiring that the gun safety instruction in the elementary schools be required to use the curriculum of the National Rifle Association.

In Washington, Republican Senators have introduced legislation to block the White House from requiring federal agencies to consider climate change data in environmental impact statements.

I will provide more information below the fold.

Let me start with McDonnell.  The League of Women Voters of Virginia has sent around an email explaining what he is doing, from which I will quote the following, since it is an action item.    The legislation as passed by the General Assembly includes this language:  

The curriculum guidelines shall incorporate, among other principles of firearm safety, accident prevention and the rules upon which the Eddie Eagle Gunsafe Program offered by the National Rifle Association or the program of the National Crime Prevention Center is based.

  McDonnell’s proposed Amendment read simply

Strike or the program of the National Crime Prevention Center

thereby requiring the use of the NRA’S Eddie Eagle program.

The commentary by LWV-VA, which asks recipients of the email to contact their local legislators, includes the following:

Don’t force Virginia public schools to present the National Rifle Association curriculum.  Local school boards should have another option.  The Mc Gruff  “Take a Bite out of Crime” curriculum was included in the original bill.  The Governor removed that option.  At Wednesday’s Veto Session, please vote against the Governor’s amendment to House Bill 1217.

On to Senate Republicans.   The source for this is the NY Times, Greenwire, a piece titled Senate Republicans Move to Bar NEPA Analysis of Climate Change Impacts.  As you can imagine even from the little I have already described, the prime mover behind this is our old fave James Inhofe, this time with co-authors Dr. (!!!) John Barasso of WY and David (diapers) Vitter of LA, along with co-sponsors Mike Enzi (WY), James Risch (ID), Bob Bennett (UT), and Pat Roberts (KS).  Allow me to offer just a few snips.

The Republican proposal says

the National Environmental Policy Act should not be used to document, predict or mitigate the climate effects of specific federal actions. Under the measure, NEPA reviews could not consider the greenhouse gas emissions of a proposed federal project nor climate change effects as related to the proposal’s design, environmental impacts, or mitigation or adaptation measures.

“Requiring federal agencies to assess the global climate change impacts from building a road will only block construction of the road and the jobs and economic activity that go with it, with no discernible impact on global climate,” Inhofe said in a statement. “The NEPA Certainty Act will put a stop to this and give employers, including small businesses, greater certainty in their hiring and economic planning.”

Some very quick commentary on both items.

Republicans control the House of Delegates in Virginia.  McDonnell’s proposal will pass there.  While Democrats have a narrow margin in the Senate, there are a number of pro-gun Democrats who, especially after last year’s big Republican win, may well support the Governor.  In other words, I expect this to become law.  This is but a small taste of what Americans could be in for if we let Republicans regain controls of governmental levers.

I sincerely doubt the Inhofe et al proposal has much chance of passing.  I suspect that Bennett is going along because of the very competitive primary (which he may well lose) in which he is currently engaged.  It is not surprising to find Inhofe attempting this.  I am not sure how this best plays politically, but at a time when the science is overwhelming about the impact of global warming, perhaps this is an issue that can be used to appeal to at least some independents.

I thought both items were worthy of being brought to people’s attention, hence this diary.

peace.