See below for a press release from the Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis on the U.S. House passing a “deeply damaging” budget resolution that, among other bad things, “would slash Medicaid and SNAP for Virginians.” Also, to see how Virginia Democrats in the U.S. House reacted, click here.
U.S. House Passes Budget Framework, Kickstarting Process to Consider Proposal that Would Slash Medicaid and SNAP for Virginians
Proposed Budget Framework Would Mean Massive Cuts that Threaten Medicaid Access for Nearly 2 Million Virginians
Today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a budget resolution that kicks off consideration of a proposal to deeply cut Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — critical programs that Virginians rely on for health care and food — all to pay for tax giveaways to the ultra-wealthy.
“Thank you to the members of Virginia’s congressional delegation who voted against this deeply damaging resolution,” said President and CEO of The Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis Ashley C. Kenneth. “Virginia families need Medicaid and SNAP, yet Congress has chosen to move forward on considering these massive cuts. The current bill would threaten access to food and health care for millions of Virginians, and could create a massive hole in Virginia’s state budget. As this disastrous bill moves through the budget process, we will continue to raise our voices to call on all of Virginia’s congressional delegation to oppose these harmful cuts that prioritize the ultra-wealthy over Virginia families.”
The House-passed resolution comes after the Senate passed a version of the budget framework last week, using a budget trick that hides the real price of the tax giveaways. An original budget framework was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in February that created a blueprint for massive cuts to key programs, including Medicaid and SNAP, while providing substantial tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans.
The House budget resolution calls for $880 billion in cuts over the next 10 years to programs under the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s jurisdiction, the vast majority of which would likely come from Medicaid. This would mean massive cuts for the nearly 2 million Virginians who receive health care from Medicaid/CHIP, including35% of people who have just given birth and their newborns. Even a 1% reduction in federal funding for Medicaid expansion would lead to the automatic disenrollment of approximately 630,000 Virginians. The Healthcare For All Virginians Coalition, which TCI leads, sent a letter to Virginia members of Congress highlighting the devastating impact that Medicaid cuts would have on Congressional districts.
These cuts are being proposed in order to pay for President Trump’s tax plan, which would disproportionately benefit the ultra-wealthy. The latest analysis on Trump’s tax plan shows that the richest 1%, people with incomes over $914,900, would see an average tax cut of $36,320 while households in the lowest 20% of incomes, people making below $28,600, would see an average tax increase of $790.
###
About The Commonwealth Institute
The Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis advances racial and economic justice in Virginia by advocating for public policies that are designed in partnership with people most impacted, and shaped by credible, accessible fiscal and policy research.
Good work by Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA08), even as House Republicans – including those from Virginia – work as hard as they can to screw the 99% of Americans who aren’t super-rich, and to “decimate essential programs that support the people we represent.” Come November 2026, EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO REMEMBER THAT – AND VOTE ACCORDINGLY!
The Republican budget will balloon our deficits and decimate essential programs like Medicaid that the people we represent depend on.
All of this to help billionaires and corporations get tax cuts that they do not need and our country cannot afford. I will vote no. pic.twitter.com/t6SdmD8SZl
April 10, 2025 (Washington, D.C.) – Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA), who serves as the Senior House Democrat on Congress’ Joint Economic Committee, spoke yesterday during floor debate in opposition to the Republican budget resolution, legislation that would pave the way for GOP tax cuts for the wealthy and cuts to critical programs like Medicaid and SNAP. The resolution passed with all Democrats and two Republicans voting against.
Beyer’s remarks follow below, and video is available here.
I rise today in strong opposition to this budget resolution, a recipe for economic disaster for our country.
Americans have been clear – they want lower prices and an economy that works for them. Yet, at every turn, this budget, this Administration, and my Republican colleagues are doubling down on policies that undermine our economy and make wealth equality even worse.
I spent much of the day with Trade Ambassador Greer and it is clear that the Administration’s myth that tariffs will reshape the U.S. economy by bullying our closest allies is nothing more than a fantasy.
The Trump tariffs represent the largest tax hike in American history. They have caused chaos in the markets, and stripped [trillions] from Americans’ retirement plans. Consumer confidence is plummeting, reaching its lowest level in 12 years, and economists are increasingly convinced we are headed for a recession.
This budget will ballon our deficits, leading to higher interest rates. It will slash critical investments, and it will decimate essential programs that support the people we represent.
All of this to help billionaires and corporations get tax cuts that they do not need and our country cannot afford.
###
UPDATE: Here’s a statement from Rep. Jennifer McClellan (D-VA04)
And here’s Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA03)
There is nothing fiscally responsible about the Trump – Republican budget. It will increase the deficit by giving tax handouts to corporations and billionaires while cutting education, Medicaid and child nutrition programs. pic.twitter.com/1mvf0Nl5lT
“Democrats should flip the House next year, and we favor them to do so. Republicans do have a couple of factors working in their favor, though, that could help them as they seek to defy history. Our initial House ratings reflect a small House map, with Democrats narrowly ahead 209-207 in the seats that at least lean to one party or the other, with 19 Toss-ups…Democrats became favorites to flip the House as soon as Trump won, and what has happened since then has not really changed that assessment.”
“VA-2 Tossup, VA-7 Lean Dem, VA-1 Likely GOP, VA-10 Likely Dem; Long way to go until November 2026; Imagine Dems will be going more on the offense; If they flip VA-2, likely they will win House majority; Flipping VA-1 would be blue wave.”
Of course, a TON can – and likely WILL – change between now and the fall of 2026. Also, in the back of my mind is the concern that the Trump administration could mess with elections themselves, whether by working to restrict the right to vote, dismantling election security networks, or god-knows-what else. Plus, who knows what shape the economy, or Trump’s approval rating, will look like come the fall of 2026. So in a way, it’s silly to try to make forecasts at all. But people are going to do that, and the “Crystal Ball” folks do know their stuff, so this is as good a baseline as any to work from in terms of which districts to focus on, where to put our energies and money, etc.
One last thought: if Democratic “overperformance” continues as we saw in Florida and Wisconsin recently, we’re talking about putting a lot more Republican-held districts (e.g., maybe even VA05?) into play. The question is, what will the electorate look like in the fall of 2026, which party’s “base” will be most fired up (ergo, more likely to show up to vote), etc. For now, we can only speculate.
We Just Saw the Cracks in Trump’s Wall of Power (“The past week undermined the narrative that has surrounded the president — that he is a political juggernaut able to run roughshod over his party and beyond.”)
The Art of the Retreat (“Trump’s abrupt pivot from his planned global trade war was touted by allies as grand strategy. The president’s own words suggested otherwise.”)
Inside the Oval: 3 reasons Trump buckled on tariffs (“After several days in which Trump steadfastly said the falling stock market didn’t bother him, the market’s continued slide, emerging problems in the bond market and the falling value of the dollar became impossible to ignore. Friendly world leaders, congressional allies, major donors and CEOs ‘were practically begging for a pause'”)
Trump’s day of tariff mayhem contains a scary lesson for his second term (“The fate of the US economy, the jobs and retirement savings of millions of people, and global security are liable at any moment over the next four years to be thrown into turmoil by the volatile moods and untested obsessions of the 47th president.”)
The Supreme Court Doesn’t Need Facts (“The justices exhibit a disturbing willingness to ignore the human costs of Trump’s actions, preferring instead to remain within the more comfortable zone of high-minded legal theory.”)
Trump orders probes of two former officials who defied him (Or, NBC News could point out in its headline that Christopher Krebs and Miles Taylor both followed the LAW and the FACTS, while Trump pressured them to help him illegally hold on to the presidency, aka help him stage a coup. But noooo…instead, NBC News goes with the “defied him” framing. WHY? One reason is that they are cowards.)
Elon Musk’s DOGE Is Getting Audited (“The Government Accountability Office’s audit examines DOGE’s handling of data at a number of federal agencies, according to sources and records reviewed by WIRED.”)
‘You’re a much smarter person than that’: US senator rages over Australia tariffs (“An increasingly angry Warner responded: ‘Sir, you’re a much smarter person than that answer: the idea that we are going to whack friend and foe alike, and particularly friends with this level, is both, I think, insulting the Australians, undermines our national security and, frankly, makes us not a good partner going forward.'”)
Witness: ‘Agitated’ man in truck brandished gun at Staunton protest rally (“Staunton Police confirmed that they are investigating a reported incident involving a man with a gun at the April 5 Hands Off! protest rally, and one of the witnesses to the incident told AFP on Wednesday that he intends to press charges against the man.”)
From DPVA, it appears that the only VA House of Delegates districts without verified Democratic candidates at the moment are: HD32 (a 60% Trump district), HD35 (a 71% Trump district), HD37 (a 69% Trump district), HD42 (a 62% Trump district), HD44 (a 76% Trump district), HD45 (an 83% Trump district), HD46 (a 79% Trump district), HD59 (a 57% Trump district), HD90 (a 58% Trump district), HD100 (a 52% Trump district). However, in looking through VPAP, there are Democratic names listed on all of these ten seats except for HD35, HD37and HD45. So presumably, in the end, Democrats will have candidates in the vast majority, if not all, of the 100 House of Delegates seats – even the ones that Trump won overwhelmingly – this fall.
As for districts with primaries, those are just these nine: HD1 (safe “blue” seat — incumbent Del. Patrick Hope vs. challengers Arjoon Srikanth and Sean Epstein); HD40 (54% Trump district; incumbent Republican Del. Joe McNamara; Democrats Donna Littlepage and Kiesha Preston); HD49(54% Trump district; incumbent Republican Del. Danny Marshall; Democrats Gary Miller and Jasmine Lipscomb); HD57 (54% Kamala Harris district; incumbent Republican Del. David Owen; Democrats May Nivar and Andrew Schear); HD72(61% Trump district; incumbent Republican Del. Lee Ware; Democrats Bilal Raychouni and Randolph Critzer); HD72(49% Kamala Harris district; incumbent Republican Del. Mark Earley Jr.; Democrats Leslie Mehta and Justin Woodford); HD81(safe “blue” seat – incumbent Del. Delores McQuinn vs. challenger Alicia Atkins); HD75(a competitve, 52% Kamala Harris seat held by incumbent Republican Del. Carrie Coyner; Democratic challengers are Stephen Miller-Pitts, Dustin Wade, Lindsey Dougherty); HD89 (competitive, open seat which went 51% for Kamala Harris – Democrats Karen “Kacey” Carnegie and Blaizen Buckshot Bloom).
P.S. Currently, Democrats hold 51 out of 100 House of Delegates seats, down from 55 prior to the 2021 elections but up from 48 after the 2021 elections. Click here for Sam Shirazi’s detailed House of Delegates preview.
****************************
List of Candidates Qualified to Appear on the Ballot for the House of Delegates Primary Elections
The Democratic Party of Virginia has verified that the following candidates have qualified to appear on the ballot for the House of Delegates primary elections on June 17, 2025. Please note that if there is only one candidate listed for a district, that candidate is the Democratic nominee.
This is superb by Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA08); well worth reading/watching.
“Ambassador Greer you have a most awful job trying to convince us and the people we represent that the president’s trade policies are wise and measured when the truth is they are stupid and bad.
The last time the US started a trade war, Smoot-Hawley tariffs, June 1930, the world DID retaliate, and we [got] the Great Depression that lasted 10 years.
I want to quickly run through a few of the ways the logic behind the Trump tariffs make no sense. You got the math wrong. According to the people whose research you cited, Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to enter into the record a New York Times article by former Treasury Official Brent Nyman titled “The Trump White House cited my research to justify tariffs it got it all wrong.” The math error had the effect of quadrupling the tariffs Trump applied on some of our biggest trading partners.
Trump exempted some goods, notably oil, but not others, including things we simply cannot produce in the United States. Why tariff bananas? Why tariff cocoa? Why tariff coffee? We don’t have the capacity to produce these things at a scale that meets domestic demand.
Trump logic equates any trade deficit with cheating; in fact, he called it rape. But even this stupid logic didn’t help Australia or Brazil or Singapore, all countries with whom we have a trade surplus. How does Australia negotiate an end to a trade deficit that doesn’t exist? Some countries have a deficit because we import things that we want but they’re too poor to afford our exports. Perfect example is Madagascar – we buy something like 60% of our vanilla from Madagascar, but they have one of the lowest GDP per capita rates in the world and they just can’t afford many of our products. But we just hit them with the 47% tariff.
Trump is hinting that maybe if countries lower tariffs on us, he might drop tariffs on them a little bit or some or possibly. But Vietnam, knowing that Trump was coming, massively cut their tariffs to appease him ahead of his announcement last week and instead you slapped a 46% tariff on them anyway. So what are the Vietnamese supposed to do?
Trump declared a phony national emergency and imposed tariffs on Canada to punish our closest ally for quote unquote fentanyl smuggling, despite the fact that our own government says the amount of smuggling at the northern border is vanishingly small, less than 1%. How does Canada get out of a tariff imposed on them for doing something that we admit they’re not doing?
Trump is risking our economy to bring back factory jobs that pay far less than the 8 million jobs that are listed in the JOLTS report right now – 8 million jobs available in America that pay far more in fast growing sectors like healthcare, clean energy or data science. The Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnik is on television raving about shifting millions of Americans to work on, and I quote, screwing in little screws to make iPhones.
You guys are blasting nearly every product from nearly every country with these tariffs. Senator Tillis yesterday called it quote a trade war on all fronts: it hurts our alliances, it hurts our economy, it hurts our ability to make and keep free trade agreements which is supposedly your job. Ambassador Greer, the world is watching you. They’re watching this hearing across the country. Global markets are in chaos. The US economy and our most important alliances are in serious danger.
I had met a couple of nights ago with a dozen ambassadors from Eastern Asia and the conclusion of the discussion was that we are creating a unipolar Asia, an Asia led by China, with America excluded. America First is America alone.
And meanwhile, you’re now serving as acting head of both the office of special counsel and the office of government ethics. These are both busy jobs in the best of times, but extremely demanding during one of the most ethically challenged presidential administrations in history. It’s absurd to think that you’re actually doing these jobs. But I think it’s fair to ask if the many hats you’re supposedly wearing are causing dangerous mistakes that damage our country in ways that’s going to be difficult to recover from.
You know, President Trump also imposed tariffs on China. China responded with tariffs on agriculture. European Union today announced 21 billion dollars worth of new retaliatory tariffs on us. China’s announced 84% retaliatory tariffs on us. The legal pretext you said is that this is a national emergency. You refer to the state of emergency as quote the largest and persistent trade deficit that’s built up in recent years. The actual emergency is that markets are slumping, consumer confidence is crashing and financial forecasts of recession are coming pretty quickly. And the Fed is projecting that these tariffs are driving prices up. We finally got inflation down, now we’re going to do exactly the opposite. Coming to the table, I don’t know. Our trade balance has been in the negative for 50 years and yet we’ve built the strongest economy in the history of mankind. This is a terrible way to fix the way of bringing back meaningful employment to our low-income Americans. This is not the way to do it.”
Rep. Subramanyam’s Opening Remarks at Full Committee Hearing on Trump-Musk Administration’s Attacks on FDA and Public Health
Washington, D.C. (April 9, 2025)—Below is Rep. Suhas Subramanyam’s opening statement, as prepared for delivery, at today’s Full Committee hearing on the Trump Administration’s purge of thousands of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) workers, endangering the health and safety of the American people.
Opening Statement Ranking Member Suhas Subramanyam Committee on Oversight and Government Reform “Restoring Trust in FDA: Rooting Out Illicit Products” April 9, 2025
Today’s hearing comes at a critical moment for public health and safety. All Americans should be able to trust that our government is working to ensure their food and medicine will be safe and affordable.
Over the past two months, however, the Trump Administration has purged thousands of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) workers, putting this essential mission and American lives at risk.
Last week, the Administration purged 10,000 people at the Department, including 3,500 FDA employees. This was on top of a purge of approximately 1,000 FDA workers in February.
Secretary Kennedy subsequently admitted that 20% of last week’s purges should not have happened. He tried to brush it off, saying, “We’ll make mistakes.” But how long will it take them to realize the full extent of the mistakes they’ve made? How long will it take for them to try—and very possibly fail—to undo those mistakes? And how many Americans will get sick or die in that time?
The FDA is supposed to make sure that our children have the vaccines they need to survive outbreaks of preventable diseases like measles, which has killed at least two children in the U.S. since February and sickened more Americans in two months than in the entirety of 2024.
The FDA is supposed to protect us from counterfeit drugs and contaminated infant formula, which are serious, bipartisan concerns. But how is the agency supposed to stop dangerous, illicit products from entering American homes and threatening American lives when underfunded food and drug inspection teams are being cut even more? 170 employees from FDA’s Office of Inspections and Investigations were reportedly let go last week.
And let me tell you about some of the expertise we are losing because of this Administration’s actions:
They fired the people responsible for regulating e-cigarettes and ensuring that predatory companies cannot market vapes to children.
They fired people responsible for monitoring drugs for side effects and updating warning labels.
They have fired the scientists monitoring bird flu and taking steps to prevent it from killing people.
They fired the scientists with expertise in fighting heavy metals, toxins, and additives in our food supply have been fired.
And they fired the people who monitor prescription drug shortages and ensure that Americans have access to affordable prescription medications
How is any of this making America healthier? We all know the answer to that question: it’s not, and people are going to die.
As a dad, I’m especially concerned by the Administration undoing the progress we’ve made to protect babies from contaminated infant formula and formula shortages. And we should all be concerned by the risk posed by contaminated meat and produce.
This chaos will keep us in the dark about looming shortages of essential drugs like antibiotics and chemotherapy drugs, and it will leave people no choice but to pay for pricey brand-name drugs because there are no FDA employees to approve generic versions. In the name of efficiency, this administration even fired employees who were critical of approving new medications, meaning Americans will have to wait longer for new treatments – if they get them at all.
One of those Americans is my constituent, a former teacher who spent 35 years of her life working at the Department of Education. She has Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, a terminal lung condition that took her aunt’s life and is slowly taking hers. It’s a rare disease that doesn’t get much funding, but she had hope.
A drug to slow down the disease received the FDA’s Breakthrough Therapy Designation in 2022, and trials showed it might actually stop the progression of her disease. Her doctor anticipated FDA approval this year. But the FDA’s funding cuts and firing of researchers and staff who sit on the approval committees has made this impossible. This Administration is stripping both hope and a life-saving medication out of the hands of Americans who need it most.
The FDA can and must do more for Americans. Addressing our country’s chronic disease epidemic, ensuring our children are set up to live long and healthy lives, getting more life-saving medications to those who need them, and ensuring the food on our shelves is safe and wholesome should be at the top of the to-do list. But rather than making it better and more efficient, the FDA is left ransacked and reeling from the chaos and destruction of the Trump Administration. It’s unclear whether the agency can even perform some of its most basic functions.
I don’t know how much clearer I can be; these health cuts will kill people. They will make us less safe and less healthy.
I was not elected to this office to watch the people we serve suffer from diseases awaiting new treatments while this administration dismantles the offices that offer hope. It’s the responsibility of this Committee to conduct meaningful oversight. If we are not talking about this and doing something about it, then we are not doing our jobs.
This is like Mitt Romney’s infamous “47 percent” comments on steroids! (h/t to American Bridge and the Democratic Party of Virginia for the audio “scoop”)
Families and small businesses in Virginia are feeling the impact of Trump’s trade war, yet Winsome Earle-Sears is saying she won’t comment on his tariffs… but we already have the receipts.
VIRGINIA – As Donald Trump’s tariffs go into effect, raising prices for Virginians, new audio has exposed Winsome Earle-Sears saying she thinks this massive tax on Virginia families and businesses is “good” and a “benefit.”
Sears’ comments from behind closed doors come after her campaign refused to answer questions from the media about Trump’s reckless tariffs.
LISTEN HERE: Winsome Earle-Sears:Now somebody asked me about the tariffs. Folks, you know what I think about that? So I understand that tariffs can hurt. But I think Trump is crazy like a fox. I mean, have you noticed the minute that he says tariffs suddenly — as my grandmother would say — these countries shaped up and started flying right? Did you notice that? Yes. Yes. […] And I think that’s good! And it’s to our benefit after all.
Thanks to Cindy Cunningham for this excellent summary of yesterday’s meeting in Alexandria. of the VA House Emergency Committee on Impacts of Federal Workforce and Funding Reductions. Also, see below for video.
The bottom line: what Trump, Musk, “DOGE,” etc. are doing is disastrous on multiple fronts, including to the Virginia economy. As Cindy Cunningham summarizes:
“Civilian federal job losses are already approaching 10%. This is expected to reduce Virginia’s 2025 GDP by $7.4 billion, causing a loss of $250 million in tax revenue to Virginia’s budget. This is JUST the losses due to civilian federal jobs, not military cuts nor contracts.”
And as Fairfax County Board Chair Jeff McKay starkly puts it:
“I mention a lot of these things that happened during COVID because I’m often asked this question. I tell people what we’re facing here is far worse than Covid. Covid was an international pandemic that was affecting everyone. This is something that is acutely affecting Virginia and Northern Virginia. We got through COVID because we had a lot of federal support. We will get no federal support with this; in fact, it is federal actions that are causing these challenges. And so that’s why we take this as a much more larger emergency than even the health pandemic.”
Welcome to the Trump economic “golden age” that (pathological liar) Glenn Youngkin promised back on Inauguration day? Uhhhh…yeah, no, that ain’t happening…
***************************
Yesterday I attended a meeting of the VA House Emergency Committee on Federal Resources. A few things we learned:
* Civilian federal job losses are already approaching 10%. This is expected to reduce Virginia’s 2025 GDP by $7.4 billion, causing a loss of $250 million in tax revenue to Virginia’s budget. This is JUST the losses due to civilian federal jobs, not military cuts nor contracts.
* Despite Youngkin and Sears’ claims that this is no big deal, and that there are plenty of jobs for these workers to take in Virginia, the federal workforce has unique skills, education, and experience, and are commensurately paid more than the non-federal workforce.
* Fairfax Chair Jeff McKay pointed out that this is a more significant loss to Northern Virginia than COVID, which hit everywhere the same but where there was lots of federal assistance to localities.
* Additional costs that Virginia will face include health care (as workers lose their insurance), child care (many were in federal programs), mental health care (imagine being told the work you’ve dedicated decades to is worthless), plus all the services the federal government formerly was able to provide, like water testing, communicable disease data tracking, food safety, etc.
If you would like to give written testimony, tell your personal story, ask the legislature for something the state government can provide to help you in these difficult times, you can leave it here.
A Win-Win Exit Strategy for Trump on Tariffs (“Offer nations truly reciprocal free trade: zero-barriers, zero-subsidies.” This is by the conservative Wall Street Journal, btw.)
The Committee to Crash the World (“As the reality of Trump’s trade war sinks in and the odds of a recession rise, a panicked Wall Street is looking desperately to his economic team to steer him toward an off-ramp. But can any of them really influence the guy at the wheel?”)
Trumpworld Makes the Case Against Trump (“MAGA supporters are attempting to understand Trump’s catastrophic decision making, while accepting Trump’s infallibility as a given.”)
Due Process for Me, Not for Thee (“Donald Trump has benefited greatly from America’s constitutional protections, but he seeks to deprive others of them.”)
In Trump Cases, Supreme Court Retreats From Confrontation (“In a series of narrow rulings, the justices have seemed to take pains to avoid a showdown with a president who has challenged the judiciary’s legitimacy.” Yeah, that is NOT going to cut it.)