The Dog that Refuses to Bark: A Stunning Clue about the Problem with American Media


    ( – promoted by lowkell)

    You probably have heard about the book from a little while back, It’s Even Worse Than It Looks. It was written by two very centrist, perhaps even conservative, interpreters of the Washington scene: Norm Ornstein (of the American Enterprise Institute) and Thomas Mann (of the Brookings Institution).

    One of the main quotations from that book describes the Republican Party as “an insurgent outlier…ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.

    When I heard first heard that passage, back in 2012, my thought was: it’s about time you noticed that. To me, that’s been blatantly, disturbingly obvious for years.

    But here’s the kicker. When Ornstein and Mann came out with their book –belatedly in my view, as I said– they were subject to a kind of ostracism, a loss of their high media status. Here’s how Raw Story put it:  

    The authors of It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism, who have found themselves ostracized by the Sunday morning shows where they had always previously been welcome…

    As a long-time aficionado of the detective story, I know a potential case-breaking clue when I see it. (The image of “the dog that didn’t bark” comes from one of Sherlock Holmes’s cases, by the way.)

    What does it mean that the media would shun the authors of a book that points to the obvious devolution of the Republican Party into something extreme, something that breaks the usual mold for a major American Party?

    Does it show that the media are actively and willingly collaborating with this destructive force? Does it show that the media are intimidated by that force? Is there any other possible explanation besides those two?

    (In the Sherlock Holmes story, “Silver Blaze,” the fact that the dog didn’t bark showed that the killer was someone with whom the dog had a friendly relationship.)

    In any event, it is stunning. And it deserves to be placed on a plate in front of the media, like a pile of dog excrement, with a demand that they explain themselves.

    * Note:  In time, Ornstein and Mann did get an appearance on Chris Hayes’s show. Chris Hayes’s show, on MSNBC, is clearly a different color of horse from the MEET THE PRESS, and FACE THE NATION kinds of show.

    Andy Schmookler, recently the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia’s 6th District, is an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher.  His books include The Parable of the Tribes:  The Problem of Power in Social Evolution.   His website is at .

    • Sjberke

      …Ornstein talked about this some time ago, and said that not too long after the book was published, someone from one of the ‘mainstream’ shows did contact him about appearing, but said that he if he did he would be regarded as representing the liberal Democratic viewpoint and be paired with someone representing the conservative Republican viewpoint.  Obviously he refused, and apparently hasn’t been considered for one of those shows since (he does appear regularly on NPR’s Diane Rehm Show, since Diane doesn’t play by those silly rules, although she does have quite a few conservatives on the show.)

    • Elaine in Roanoke

      An answer to just why the so-called media demands conflict is right here:

      “CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC saw their viewership increase during the 16-day partial shutdown, peaking at more than five million Wednesday evening when Congress passed a compromise bill to put the government back online.”

      “It was a drama,” said CNN congressional correspondent Dana Bash, who logged many hours of airtime along with Kelly O’Donnell of NBC News and Mike Emanuel of Fox. “Whenever there’s a drama, people are interested.”

      It has nothing to do with journalism. It’s all “reality TV” and selling ads.

    • Jim B

      The MSM apparently doesn’t want any one bashing and in particular conservatives because it violates their “both sides are guilty” refrain.

      You can go back to trick dick and find that conservatives are quick to use the both sides are guilty to keep from admitting their side was wrong. So has the MSM become mostly conservative?