Home National Politics Senator Mark Warner: MIA, AWOL, or What?

Senator Mark Warner: MIA, AWOL, or What?

1238
9
SHARE

Dear Senator Warner,

A great many Americans were heartened – one might say, relieved – when you and Senator Burr stood before the press together, one month ago, and assured us that you and your Committee were going to get to the bottom of that most troubling issue: the Russian attack on our election and the question of the Trump campaign’s relationship with that attack.

You would pursue the truth, the two of you told us, and would follow the investigation wherever it leads.

A month has gone by, and we learn from a stunning article by Michael Isakoff that – after all these weeks — the investigation has gone pretty close to nowhere. No key witnesses interviewed. Not a single subpoena issued for relevant documents. A tiny staff that is only part time on this investigation, and that contains no one with the kind of background suitable for such a task.

So many welcomed the reassurance your bi-partisan news conference in March gave us that our system of government was going to deal appropriately with this possibly grave threat to the integrity of our constitutional system.

We’d all just witnessed how the Republican Chair of the House Intelligence Committee had driven that investigation off the rails with his ludicrous charade revealing him to be serving the President he was supposed to be investigating.

But now, the Isakoff article reports that your Committee, too, may have a serious problem with its Republican Chair. The reason the Committee hasn’t even requested crucial evidence, Isakoff tells us, is “because the panel’s chairman, Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., has so far failed to respond to requests from the panel’s Democrats to sign letters doing so…”

So we, who care deeply about this potential national crisis, naturally look to you to represent us in our deep concern about the damage being done to our constitutional order.

When Nunes subverted the House investigation, after its strong beginning, the ranking member – Rep. Adam Schiff – stood up before the American people and spoke the truth– powerfully, responsibly, in a clear and measured way. He made it clear that he would not stand by idly while someone who put Party ahead of nation tried to sabotage the fulfillment of their solemn duties.
Senator Burr may be sabotaging the effort in a less flamboyant way, but it seems that you’re in a similar position to where Rep. Schiff was.

But where is your voice? I’ve been listening for it, but haven’t heard it. Did I miss something?

You presumably don’t need to be reminded of how high the stakes are in pursuing this investigation, and thereby maintaining the integrity of our constitutional system. You yourself said, “This may very well be the most important thing I do in my public life.”

That sounds right to me. Not only have we been attacked – in a meaningful sense – by a powerful adversary. But we are being governed by a president, and a group, that may well have collaborated with that adversary to subvert our democratic process.

We have good grounds to suspect the worst—but not because of your Committee, or any other part of Congress. The suspicious evidence is piling up—but only because a great many journalists are doggedly pursuing the truth.

Journalism cannot get the job done by itself. Getting at the truth isn’t enough. We also need responsible power able and willing to act on that truth.

I’d really like to hear how you’re dealing with this “most important” responsibility. Maybe if we knew what you were up to, we could see that you’re taking a wise and appropriate course. Frankly, though, from what is visible now, I cannot imagine how your silence is what would best serve the nation.

But if you are doing the right thing, the American people need to hear from you, explaining why we should feel confident that everything will be done to make sure that power can be held accountable in the America of today. We can’t afford for that American majority — who understand that this Trump/Russia issue is a big deal — to become disheartened.

So please, Senator Warner: Reassure us. Tell us how – even though the investigation appears to be dead in the water – “the system is working,” to use a phrase from Watergate days.

Or if it’s not working, let us see you fighting for the responsible investigation you promised, in order to “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

****************************

Thoughts on What to Do

You have indeed a most important job to do. Most immediately, you’re the person in a position to keep hope alive.

Show us, as our representative, what the determined defense of our constitutional order looks like. We need to stand that ground, strike that blow, vicariously, through you.

Don’t allow despair to drain the power of all of us Americans who are concerned about how profound will the damage to American democracy that Trump’s presidency will inflict.

When you are silent, and the other side is willfully running interference for the president, we lose heart.

Take a strong stand. And maybe the best stand to take is to call for an independent panel with the power of subpoena. Something like the 9/11 Commission.

That card has some distinct advantages:  It simultaneously calls attention to the failure of the Republicans, while also showing you as above partisanship, the champion who wants to make sure the right thing is done:

“We apparently can’t have this important investigative process done right here in this Committee, but it is too important a matter to allow partisan problems to prevent us from knowing the truth and dealing appropriately with whatever it is that happened. So let us take this vital matter out of the political arena and get the job done right by a blue-ribbon group trusted and respected by Americans of all political stripes.”

You establish your credibility by asking simply for neutrality, allegiance to truth, and the good of the nation.

You put pressure on people like Burr to shape up or lose their role in dealing with this important matter. And you seize the moral ground.

What do you think, Senator Warner? Are you up for making a public fight against the Republicans’ violation of their oath of office– so clearly shown by Nunes and now by Burr? If Adam Schiff played his card right, and I think he did, would you be up for playing your card in a similar spirit?

Is fighting the Republicans — who are putting Party ahead of nation — something you’re ready and able to do?

 

  • Andy Schmookler

    Now I’m pushing Senator Warner, in another piece– but with the same goal in mind, which is to fight to protect our democracy from being damaged. Maybe a good PR person would be able to sell me, with enhanced credibility because he fights for the same thing — to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States in view of what we know and what we suspect about Trump and the Russians.

    Going after a Republican and a Democrat helps underscore the non-partisan nature of the battle against what Trump is doing to the country.

    The partisan issues have become almost secondary, for we are talking here about a whole amoral spirit, that seemed to be open to making common cause with a powerful adversary for help in becoming president.

    We are talking about law and treason and greed and utter irresponsibility. We are talking about the one thing that our Founders requited of those elected to public office: to protect and defend the Constitution. If what looks true about Trump and the Russians proves to be true, what would that mean to the state of the Constitution that such a man be President of the United States, having got there with such a wholly unconscionable alliance with the enemy.

    • Jim B

      Strange times, no one among the republicans seems to be interested in protecting the constitution.

  • Andy Schmookler

    Here’s where the Senator Warner piece is: http://bluevirginia.us/2017/04/senator-mark-warner-mia-awol

    A movement could form by adopting a two-pronged approach to the two parties.

    In the case of the Democrats, to be louder and bolder about this Russia/Trump business.

    Let us push the Republicans to stop protecting the president by violating their oath to protect the Constitution. The “Protect and Defend the Constitution” movement, one might say, with a non-partisan deep American message, shown by challenging both parties for the same purpose: challenging the Republicans to be less evil, and challenging the Democrats to be less cowardly and weak.

    That is the pair that America has fallen under the sway of. One side evil, the other side cowardly and weak. Inhibited about going on the attack.

    How much attack does this Russia/Trump situation call for. A lot, I think.

  • No sign of Warner at today’s Virginia climate rally or march. I DO recall him, however, speaking to an “astroturf” pro-coal rally a few years ago on the National Mall. So…clearly he makes time for what he wants to make time for.

  • RGN

    Excellent article. Spot on contrasting how Rep. Schiff has out maneuvered the GOP obstruction as compared to Sen. Warner.

  • Jeff Holcomb

    I hope you folks watched last night as Bernstein and Woodward recalled some of their reporting on Watergate. It was painstaking. It wasn’t glamorous. It was out of the spotlight. Many of us just remember the results, but they recalled how the Post published over 200 articles, not all of it attention grabbing. That’s what we need in this investigation. You praise Schiff, who may be doing a fine job but hasn’t seen a microphone he doesn’t like. Warner seems to be making certain that facts are actually ascertained, that conclusions are made with deliberation, evenness, fairness and bipartisanship. If this is as important as many of us believe it to be the standard Warner is applying is the only one which will serve our country and the test of time.

    • Andy Schmookler

      I don’t see how your comment, Mr. Holcomb, comports with the Isakoff description of the lack of interviews, the lack of documents, the lack of staff– the lack of the elements necessary to do that “making certain the facts are actually ascertained” that you attribute to Senator Warner.

      If you are privy to what Senator Warner has been doing that substantiates that nice picture you’re painting, please fill the rest of us in.

      If you know that this investigation is NOT moribund — notwithstanding what Isakoff reports — please supply us with your information.

      And if you acknowledge that the investigation IS moribund, but you have information that Senator Warner — notwithstanding the apparent absence of any public protest on his part to the lack of progress — is doing just what needs to be done to assure that the Constitution is protected and defended, tell us what you know.

  • Glen Bayless

    Warner has not disappeared. He is spending all his time seding alarmist fund raising emails. I get at least one and sometimes several every day