A week ago, Roll Call named Rep. Denver Riggleman (R-VA05) the fourth-most vulnerable incumbent U.S. House member in the country – “because of an intraparty challenge that has extra weight because of the way Republicans in his district will choose their nominee.” But wait, it gets better! LOL
“Riggleman became vulnerable when the 5th District’s Republican committee voted in November to have a nominating convention instead of a primary. The move could give extra weight to votes from religious conservatives on the committee who tried to censure the freshman lawmaker after he officiated a gay wedding. The nomination process has been thrown into question by the coronavirus pandemic. Riggleman’s campaign was pushing to revert to a primary as a safer alternative. His opponent, former Liberty University athletics director Bob Good, told CQ Roll Call the party committee was planning a drive-thru convention in the parking lot of the church where Good happens to worship.”
Wait, what?!? A “drive-thru convention in the parking lot of the church where Good happens to worship?” That sounds super fair, huh? But they wouldn’t actually *do* that, right? Uhhh…yep, they sure would! See above for a series of tweets, last night, by Roanoke Times reporter Amy Friedenberger, about the 5th CD GOP committee deciding on a convention at the “Tree of Life Ministries” in Lynchburg, which just so happens to be Good’s “home church.” Yep, that’s Republicans for you.
So how has Rep. Denver “Bigfoot Erotica” Riggleman responded to this latest news, which certainly seems to favor his even-more-far-right (if that’s even possible) opponent, Bob Good? See below for what he just posted on Facebook – clearly, he’s not happy!
From Denver Riggleman (bolding added by me for emphasis):
Of course we already know how Riggleman felt about this situation. For instance, in this interview last week on right-wing talk radio, an irate Riggleman threw around words like “fraudulent,” “do you really believe that we should disenfranchise what 99.9% of voters,” “they’ll do anything to win,” “mind-boggling,” “graft,” “corruption in the backroom,” “pay-to-play,” “I will not stand for it,” “appalling,” “crap,” etc. Great stuff, huh? I mean, from a Democratic perspective, it’s really hot-buttered popcorn time, as the 5th CD GOP tears itself apart, descends into vitriol and bitterness, and reduces their chances of holding this seat in November.
P.S. Here’s how 5th CD Democratic candidate John Lesinski responded a few minutes ago. I’m happy to post responses from other 5th CD Democratic candidates – RD Huffstetler, Cameron Webb and Claire Russo. – as well!
“The Republican primary has become a mess of threats, lawsuits, and hypocrisy. At the heart of this is the Republican Party’s obsession with influencing the process and its inability to place the choice in the hands of voters. It’s sad to see.”
And here’s a response from 5th CD Democratic candidate Cameron Webb:
“It’s good to see that they’ve finally decided on a process to select their nominee. The reality is that I’m focused on our Democratic primary and not the ins and outs of Republican Party politics here in the 5th. That said, you can’t help but notice all of the acrimony and bickering to get them to even this point—and the stark contrast that is with our process, our forums and our contested primary among Democrats in the 5th. Virginians want more of the common sense, the collegiality, and the focus on issues, vision and solutions, and less of the bickering, back-biting, and name-calling that defines dysfunctional politics and dysfunctional politicians. We’re in a moment when we have to be at our best working together in government, and they’re just making the case that this district won’t be optimally represented by either of them.”