Home Blog Page 112

How Elite Cowardice Threatens America’s Future

5

By Kindler (Please check out my Substack)

It is hard for me to express the sinking feeling I had the week before, listening to the oral arguments before the Supreme Court about Trump’s eligibility to run for president. It was like having been thrown off a ship and waiting for somebody, anybody to throw you a life preserver – but watching no one do so, not even the passengers you thought were your friends.

What bugged me was that none of them seriously addressed the issue of Trump’s insurrectionist act of attempting to overturn the 2020 election, including by inciting mob violence. Several of the right-wing Justices mocked and downplayed the idea that the horrific assault on our democracy culminating on January 6th, 2021 was anything unusual, with the supposedly more moderate Chief Justice John Roberts even claiming that “Insurrection is a broad, broad term.”

Really? Our nation’s highest authorities on what our laws mean and how to enforce them think that this Constitutionally proscribed, dangerous act is just plain undefinable? Any of us can in fact find a legal definition of insurrection on the Web within minutes – e.g., “A rising or rebellion of citizens against their government, usually manifested by acts of violence” – and with more time, can trace the history of how it’s been used in US history, as dozens of historians did in crafting amicus briefs to the Court, which appear to have been roundly ignored.

Why did even the Democratically appointed Justices shy away from discussing the grave danger that Trump poses to American democracy, instead diverting the discussion to all kinds of lesser issues? I’m sure that lots of commentators have lots of theories about it, but I would sum the biggest reason up in one word: cowardice.

It’s the Cowardice, Stupid!

Scholars of history and political science have long debated the philosophical question of whether history is written by the actions of individuals or by impersonal forces – demographic, evolutionary, climatic, economic, etc. – acting upon us. While the obvious answer is “a combination of both”, academia has long preferred to focus on the objective forces that they can measure, submit to statistical tests, and so on rather than having to evaluate and judge the messy actions of human beings.

But of course, this approach is both disempowering and causes one to miss many opportunities history has had to take a different course. Right now, as so many have observed, American democracy faces deep, unusual threats to its existence, and whether it succeeds or fails will depend on the decisions and actions of many people, from the humblest plebe to the most powerful patrician.

While all of us have a critical role to play, it’s no secret that some people have a lot more power over our society than others – namely, the elites of every field, from law to journalism to academia to business.  But the rise of Trump has laid bare our national leadership crisis – that a huge portion of the American elite lacks the courage to stand up to those who would threaten the foundations of our democratic society.  They don’t want to risk pissing off people who may threaten them with harm or even just verbally attack them on social media. Their reaction to bullies is to keep their heads down so that they don’t get bullied next – rather than trying to help all the victims who are way more vulnerable than them.

Stoking the Fears of Corporate and Republican Weasels

It’s important to understand this because a large portion of the strategy of Trump and the MAGA movement is actually focused on stoking and leveraging elite cowardice to its own political and economic benefit.

Take the so-called “War on Woke” (this word salad itself a war on the English language) and the related assaults on the corporate ESG (environmental, social and governance) movement. Republicans know full well that many corporate executives secured their positions not through anything resembling courage or even leadership, but to the contrary, have moved up the ranks based on their ability to avoid hard decisions or risks while keeping their own butts securely covered.

So right wing propagandists like Chris Rufo (mastermind of both the “CRT” and trans scares) know that if they can label anything they do not perceive to be in their interest as “controversial” and potentially costly to executives, they can count on these suits to run away from doing the good work that they have pledged to do.

Sacly, there is ample evidence that these scare tactics work.  As Bill McKibben recently reported, both Bank of America and British bank HSBC recently reneged on climate commitments they had made to stop providing financing to new fossil fuel ventures. He quotes the New York Times on the likely reason:

“Bank of America’s change follows intensifying backlash from Republican lawmakers against corporations that consider environmental and social factors in their operations. Wall Street in particular has come under fire for what some Republicans have called ‘woke capitalism,’ a campaign that has pulled banks into the wider culture wars.”

Cowardice, yes, or viewed from another perspective, cynicism – Republican politicians soaked in oil money giving corporate America cover to do what they want to do anyway, just focus on short term profits and not give a damn about the consequences of their actions on people or the planet.

Trump’s political and legal strategies are similarly aimed at stoking the cowardice and exhaustion of anyone who might oppose him. No, he’s not simply a random babbler, but he often says and does things for a conscious reason. His gangsterish taunting of Nikki Haley after the New Hampshire primary was only the latest of so many examples over his twisted political career:

“And just a little note to Nikki…She would be under investigation by those people in 15 minutes, and I could tell you five reasons why already. Not big reasons, little stuff she doesn’t want to talk about. But she will be under investigation within minutes.”

As always with this thug, he is not only threatening a rival to fall into line but sending a not-at-all subtle message to everyone else he can reach – kiss my pinky ring or I will end your career.  And Republicans, remembering how the likes of Reps. Lynn Cheney, Adam Kinzinger got drummed out of the party, respond like frightened sheep.  There are too many cases to mention, though Sen. Tim Scott’s self-abasement was a recent, painful example to watch.

Bullies and Victims

The terrifying logic of fascism divides society into two major groups: bullies and victims.  Both are essential to making this warped system work.  Attacking victims both verbally and physically is a regular fascist ritual that binds the dictators’ supporters together through the cleansing act of putting the scum in their place.

You can try to back away into a third category of bystander, but…lots of luck not being pulled in by the irresistible force of a society based on the foundation of forcing its citizens into perpetual conflict and misery.  So, while trying to hide from all the conflict –  turning away when you see immigrants or black people or whomever being beaten up –  may be the natural instinct of a coward, in fact it is a lot safer in a society devolving into fascism to show yourself to be one of the bullies.

Hence the nefarious tendency of fascism to push more and more regular people to become monsters in order to save their own skins.  The louder you shout against “the communists” or “the Jews” or “the illegals”, the less likely you will be viewed as an ally of these targeted groups and thus a potential target yourself.

Bullying thus becomes the last refuge of the coward fighting to secure his or her position in an increasingly chaotic society.  So the Republicans, corporate execs, media titans and others desperate to get the bullies off their back end up bullying the usual suspects as a way to show their loyalty.

Again, there are more examples than one can name.  Coming back to the Supreme Court’s oral arguments over Colorado’s bid to remove Trump from the ballot, Dahlia Lithwick correctly noted Justice Alito’s, Robert’s and Gorsuch’s bullying posture against the lawyer for the plaintiffs:

“And the thing…we hadn’t talked about enough is the mob-like threat that emerged from some justices, like—nice democracy you got, it’d be a shame if something happened to it. By that I mean, there was this subtle threat, right? And it starts in Jonathan Mitchell’s briefing, when he says there’ll be all sorts of chaos and mayhem and violence if Trump is removed from the ballot. There was a question from Chief Justice John Roberts about how, if the court sides with Colorado, Republicans are going to knock Democrats off the ballot next. It’s there in Justice Samuel Alito’s questioning about vexatious, frivolous lawsuits that will surely follow.”

You can see the bullying in Trumpist Special Counsel Hur’s gratuitous attacks on President Biden in his report, going well beyond his legal mandate. You can see it in the “Guardian Angels” beating up alleged immigrants in New York City live on Sean Hannity’s show.  You can see it in all the legal, political and personal attacks on trans people, a tiny minority that poses no threat to anyone but is easy to isolate and scapegoat.  You can see it in all the years of dishonest attacks on Dr. Fauci, a recently retired civil servant who dedicated so many years to his job – now serving as one of the foundations of Robert Kennedy’s conspiracy-theory driven presidential campaign.

The Value of Reward and Punishment

While many members of the elite – outside the GOP anyway – resist the urge to join the bullying frenzy, they too frequently enable it by failing to stand up to the bullies strongly enough to make a difference.  These are the people, quite frankly, whose spines we need to stiffen – by setting an example ourselves of speaking truth to power and by singling out for praise or condemnation whoever may do the right or the wrong thing.

On this last point, I have to note that every time on social media when I compliment the words or actions of someone with whom I or my allies may disagree frequently – say, Mitt Romney or Liz Cheney – my feed always includes someone saying that I shouldn’t do so because they’re wrong on [x] or did [y] bad thing in the past. These critics are missing the point of how much more bravery it takes a Republican to stand up to the MAGA crowd, when their entire party has been taken over by these violent, angry hordes.

If you want to see your leaders act bravely, you have to reward them for engaging in even isolated moments of courage. Those who choose to be in the public eye are rarely indifferent to how people feel about them, which gives us the power to at least sometimes influence their behavior by giving or withholding our praise.  I mean, it’s how most of us work, as do our babies, dogs and (well, occasionally) cats.

We similarly have to push our leaders – in all fields, from politics and the media to sports and entertainment – to move beyond their comfort zones and be braver in doing all they can to stop America’s slide toward fascism. Because having power often does mean being comfortable in life, which brings with it the risk of losing some of that comfort if you dare rock the boat.

But we are past the point at which anyone in America can just try to hide away and expect to ride out the storm at a time when we have a presidential candidate promising to be a dictator on Day One – the same guy who incited a violent rebellion that breached the U.S. Capitol, the center of US democracy, the last time he lost.

Cowardice is contagious, but so is courage. We need to find the latter in our hearts and spread it far and wide until enough of us stand up to the monsters to finally, decisively stop them in their tracks.

Which Virginia Legislators Introduced the Most, Fewest Bills in 2024?

3

Per VPAP, see below for the number of bills introduced by each Virginia legislator this session. On the House of Delegates side, Del. Patrick Hope (D-Arlington) introduced the most bills (45), followed by Del. Rodney Willett (D-Henrico) at 32 bills, Del. Irene Shin (D-Fairfax) with 29 bills and Del. Rip Sullivan (D-Fairfax) also at 29 bills. In general, Republican delegates introduced the fewest bills (and thank goodness, since many of them are extreme/crazy – so the fewer the better, and hopefully almost all of them will be killed by Democrats in House and/or Senate committees!), with Democrats accounting for 9 out of the top 10 on the list.  In the State Senate, 8 of the top 9 on the list are Democrats – and 9 of the bottom 12 are Republicans.

Leading the Senate list were Sen. Barbara Favola (D-Arlington) with 29 bills introduced, followed by Sen. Creigh Deeds (D-Charlottesville) with 23 bills, Sen. Adam Ebbin (D-Alexandria) with 23 bills as well and Sen. Jeremy McPike (D-Prince William County) also with 23 bills introduced. Interestingly, given that leadership often introduces very few (or even zero) bills, Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell (D-Fairfax) is high on the list as well, with 22 bills introduced. Does this guy ever sleep? LOL

P.S. Obviously, the raw number of bills introduced doesn’t indicate whether the legislators got their bills passed, or how important (or good/bad) the bills are. We’ll get more on the legislators’ “batting averages” once the session ends; for now, you can look at the bills on the Legislative Information System to see what everyone’s introduced and what you think of the bills.

Monday News: Cheney Warns of GOP “Putin Wing,” Trump Silent on Navalny’s Murder by Putin; “Poll Ranks Biden as 14th-Best President, With Trump Last”; “Voters feel better about the economy”; “Va. Senate budget scraps Metro funding, arena — setting up battle with House”

33

by Lowell

Here are a few international, national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Monday, February 19.

Three Main Instances Where E-Bike Manufacturers Can Be Held Liable

7

SPONSORED CONTENT

Three Main Instances Where E-Bike Manufacturers Can Be Held Liable

Getting involved in an e-bike crash with a vehicle can be devastating, not to mention financially debilitating. In most cases, the motorist gets away unscathed or with minor injuries, while the e-bike rider battles more serious injuries. The only way to recover is to receive some sort of compensation from the driver, especially if the accident is their fault.

However, there are cases where the driver is not the one at fault; the e-bike manufacturer is. Personal injury law in New York allows victims to pursue a claim against an e-bike manufacturer, provided you can prove liability on their part. Here are three major scenarios where you can sue the manufacturer of your e-bike for the accident that caused your injuries.

Scenario 1: When the Vehicle is Poorly Designed

Sometimes, the accident was not because of something you or the other driver did or did not do. Sometimes, accidents occur because the vehicle manufacturer designed it poorly or did not use the right manufacturing materials. E-bike brands are not all the same, which is why doing your research before buying an electronic bicycle is essential.

If, after getting an expert to examine the accident scene, they discover that the cause of the accident was the design, You can file a personal injury claim against the manufacturer for endangering your life and the lives of those around you. However, you need solid proof that the vehicle was poorly designed and that the design flaws caused the accident.

Scenario 2: The Manufacturing Process Was Flawed

You can also sue an e-bike manufacturer for an e-bike accident in New York if there are defects in the manufacturing process. Naturally, a flaw in the manufacturing process of an e-bike can result in a defective vehicle – even potentially dangerous.

Since consumers do not know anything about e-bikes and can only rely on the words of the manufacturers. It is on the manufacturer to ensure the bikes are safe to be used on the road – for everyone. If they are negligent in this regard, whatever tragic accident occurs due to these flaws will be on them.

Scenario 3: The Manufacturer Did Not Notify You of Product Flaws

Mistakes are not uncommon in manufacturing, and it is possible that a manufacturer discovered the mistakes after the products have been made public. However, when that happens, New York’s law constrains the manufacturer to inform their customers of the flaws and recall the products if necessary. If the manufacturer fails to do these and someone gets hurt, they will be held liable for the accident.

Therefore, if an e-bike manufacturer fails to inform their consumers of a known defect with the e-bike or its components. Tragic accidents can occur, leaving riders with serious injuries and even death.

Failure to fulfill this legal obligation means the e-bike manufacturer will be fully held accountable for whatever happens. In other words, you can sue your e-bike manufacturer for the accident and lay a claim for compensation.

Conclusion

If you were involved in an e-bike accident in New York and believe it was because of a flaw in your e-bike. “You can file a lawsuit against the e-bike manufacturer and get compensation for your losses, provided you have proof that the accident happened because of the flaw,” says Attorney Neal Goldstein of Goldstein & Bashner.

A New York personal injury attorney can help you obtain solid proof and build a strong personal injury case for you. However, you should consult a lawyer with extensive experience handling e-bike accident cases like yours.

 

 

Video, Slides from VA House Appropriations Committee Presentations – Ditching Youngkin’s Regressive Tax Proposals, Requiring that Virginia Rejoin RGGI, etc.

13

See below for video and a bunch of slides from this afternoon’s budget presentations to the Virginia House Appropriations committee. A few highlights include removal of most of Glenn Youngkin’s regressive/ridiculous tax cuts for the wealthy; language requiring that Virginia rejoin the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative; increased funding for Metro; removal of Hyde Amendment language; etc. Good stuff, and presumably all of this will pass the Democratic-controlled General Assembly; the question really being what happens after that – will Youngkin take a hatchet to this via his line-item veto or will he try to actually work with Democrats for a change? Stay tuned…but definitely don’t hold your breath waiting for a more reasonable Youngkin.

 

 

*****************
Sen. Louise Lucas’ opening statement at the Senate Finance/Appropriations Committee hearing late this afternoon

 

Video: Speaker Don Scott Talks About the Proposed Wizards/Caps Arena Deal, VA GOP Attacks on Him and How “I’m just going to continue to move forward and continue to do the work that I have to do”

1

This morning on Fox5 DC, Virginia Speaker of the House of Delegates Don Scott talked about the proposed Wizards/Caps arena deal in Potomac Yard (Alexandria), as well as about attacks on him by Virginia Republicans and how he plans to move forward for the good of Virginia. Check out the clip, below, as well as some highlights, including:

  • Speaker Scott said he’s “not sure” whether the proposed arena deal is going anywhere in the General Assembly this year. Speaker Scott added that “we have a responsibility to do our due diligence on anything that comes to the Commonwealth as an economic development opportunity…I understand…Senator Lucas…her reservations…I understand her skepticism…even with that skepticism, I feel like we have an opportunity to do the best job that we can for the Commonwealth of Virginia, review the project, and I think that’s why the bill came out of the House to continue the conversation, continue to gather information, to see if this is a deal that will really be transformational, while also solving a huge transportation issue in that region of Virginia while also helping create tax revenues for other parts of the state.”
  • Speaker Scott emphasized that it’s NOT just “one lawmaker” (Senator Lucas) holding up this deal – “she makes no moves that are just her, she moves as a leader…she has the opportunity and the right to continue to negotiate in this way in regard to the arena.”
  • Regarding Glenn Youngkin’s attitude/approach, Speaker Scott said “the governor is a businessman by nature, even though he may sometimes lean a little further right than I’d like…maybe say some bombastic things that are outside the purview of what we need to get done for…Virginia…at the end of the day, he is negotiating…we’ll find out if he will move in our direction or not, and that’s why you continue to negotiate…I think there are so many other things that we can get done for the Commonwealth beyond just the arena or some of these other issues that I think we’ll be ok even if…either side gets what they want.
  • On Republican attacks against him, Speaker Scott said, “It’s unfortunate…something 30 years ago that they want to continue to look in the past, I continue to look in the future. I’m grateful for those Republican colleagues who came out and condemned the statementThis has been a pattern for them since I first announced that I was running in 2019, so I’m not surprised, I’m not disappointed, I’m not swayed in any way, I’m just going to continue to move forward and continue to do the work that I have to do, because I know there are so many people counting on me to get this job done.”

Sunday News: “Shock, anger and war fatigue: Ukraine’s two years of agony”; “Trump Allies Plan New Sweeping Abortion Restrictions”; Trump’s Completely Unhinged, Falsehood-Laden Michigan Speech; “How billionaire Ted Leonsis decided to move Wizards, Capitals to Virginia”

32

by Lowell

Here are a few international, national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Sunday, February 18.

Why Do Criminal Cases Take So Much Time in Arizona?

1

SPONSORED CONTENT

Why Do Criminal Cases Take So Much Time in Arizona?

Criminal cases come with several questions, including what the process looks like and how much time it takes, among others. Criminal cases take a lot of time to resolve in Arizona, usually between four to six months. However, that depends on the specifics of the case and the severity of the charges.

For example, while low-level felony cases can take up to a year, major felony cases typically take longer. However, although Arizona’s legal system strives to give both plaintiffs and defendants their right to a fast trial, it is not always possible.

That is because the system must also ensure thorough and fair court proceedings, and these things take time. With that said, if you have a criminal case, here are three factors that can make it run longer than normal.

1.    Pretrial Motion Schedule and Legal Procedures

The legal processes associated with criminal cases start with scheduling, of which courts might have limited resources or busy dockets. If the court has either of these two, then there will most likely be a delay. Furthermore, the limited number of judges, high caseloads, and courtroom availability can delay legal procedures, including pretrial motion scheduling.

In addition to that, before the trial starts properly, several pretrial motions and legal procedures must first take place. The legal processes include evidence discovery and the motion to suppress the evidence presented, among other arguments that can delay the case significantly. This gives you all the more reason to have a seasoned criminal lawyer in Arizona representing you.

2.    Next Step – Evidence Obtaining

Criminal cases, among other court proceedings, are based on evidence, and getting sufficient evidence for criminal trials is time-consuming and rather challenging. The plaintiff has the burden of proof; the court requires them to provide real, documentary, testimonial, digital, and demonstrative evidence. Usually, they will obtain these pieces of evidence from witnesses, police officers, and other parties involved, which will delay the trials.

Meanwhile, let us briefly explain the different categories of evidence plaintiffs need to present:

  • Real evidence – evidence collected from the crime scene like a knife, gun, or blood-stained clothes
  • Documentary evidence – evidence that builds up from the events before the crime; it should be presented alongside real evidence
  • Testimonial evidence – the simplest form of evidence, consisting of statements from eyewitnesses of the crime
  • Digital evidence – evidence recovered from electronic or digital sources such as dash cams and CCTV, among others; and
  • Demonstrative evidence – attorneys, as well as prosecutors, often use this piece of evidence to prove the case, consisting of animations, diagrams, and maps

3.    Plea Bargains

The third factor that may extend a criminal case beyond normal is the plea bargain, which is preceded by negotiations. Oftentimes, criminal cases can be resolved through negotiations and plea bargains, but they differ from those done in personal injury cases. There will be negotiations in criminal cases if the defendant admits fault and agrees to plead guilty for a reduced sentence or charges.

“Plea bargains can be lengthy and time-consuming, requiring that defendants first accept the charges being leveled against them. Then, the office of the prosecutor will find an agreement the judge will accept, depending on the case’s nature,” says Attorney Ryan McPhie of Grand Canyon Law Group.

Conclusion

Criminal cases in Arizona can take between six months to over a year, depending on the specifics of the case. Several other factors can also affect how long the case takes to be resolved, including those mentioned above. Overall, some criminal cases can be quite complicated due to the presence of multiple defendants, a huge body of evidence, and legal issues.

 

 

Team Biden-Harris Slam Team Trump’s Plans to Ban Abortion Nationwide, With or Without Congress

7

From the Biden-Harris campaign:

Team Biden-Harris Slam Team Trump’s Plans to Ban Abortion Nationwide, With or Without Congress

The following is a statement from Biden-Harris 2024 Campaign Manager Julie Chavez Rodriguez on new reporting that outlines Team Trump’s plan to circumvent Congress and institute more devastating attacks on reproductive care access.

“It’s never been clearer what the American people can expect from Donald Trump: if given power, he will circumvent Congress and further rip away women’s health care, including attempting to unilaterally institute a national abortion ban. These plans are as terrifying as they are unsurprising. This is the same guy who has said women who have an abortion should be punished, and is actively campaigning – and has even run ads – boasting about his role in overturning Roe v. Wade. The same guy who promises to rule as a dictator on his first day. As President Biden said yesterday, Donald Trump has no idea about the power of America’s women, and he’s about to find out this November.”

Reproductive Freedom for All President and CEO Mini Timmaraju said:

“The most chilling part of the playbook of horrors Trump’s advisors have cooked up is how confident they are that he can do untold damage in a second term—with or without Congress. If they have another opportunity, they’ll act on it, and the consequences will be unimaginable. We can’t afford to give them that chance, and the 8 in 10 Americans who support legal abortion won’t allow it.”

Planned Parenthood Action Fund President and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson released the following statement:

“Right now, we are living the consequence of a Donald Trump presidency. He has already caused unprecedented damage to abortion rights and to millions of people, which he has even bragged about. If given the opportunity, Donald Trump will try to bypass Congress to ban abortion nationwide and launch more attacks on our fundamental freedoms. He is a disaster for democracy and a disaster for sexual and reproductive health care. Come November, we know that voters will not be fooled: President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only ticket with a record of protecting reproductive freedom.”

EMILYs List Interim President Jessica Mackler released the following statement:

“One day after we learned Donald Trump wants a federal abortion ban, reports show that his allies are planning to use the full force of government to roll back our reproductive rights. This is yet another reminder that no matter how Republicans try to rebrand their abortion agenda, their plan is clear: they want to end abortion rights and access altogether. There is a clear choice in November: Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, who have worked consistently to protect our rights, or Donald Trump and his Republican allies, who want to take our decisions and our rights away.”

ACLU Chief Advocacy & Political Officer, Deirdre Schifeling released the following statement:

“Trump’s comments in support of a nationwide abortion ban show what we’ve long known: He and anti-abortion extremists at all levels will stop at nothing until our rights are stripped away.

The majority of Americans strongly support abortion rights. We must elect leaders this year who reflect our values and push to restore abortion access in every state across the country. The only way we can stop extreme bans is to elect a president, and a House and Senate, that will pass federal legislation to protect abortion rights and reproductive freedom — voters deserve nothing less.”

###

Paid for by Biden for President

Virginia “Crossover” Week: The Bills That Lived (at Least for Now), the Bills That Died…

3

by Cindy, cross posted from VAPLAN’s website

This was crossover week, when the House had to take any action on House bills, and the Senate had to take any action on Senate bills (except for the budget). After crossover, senators go over to the House to defend their bills and vice versa. Unfortunately, there are always a few casualties–bills that don’t make the crossover; a few are highlighted below.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK, Delegate Mundon King, during floor discussion of HB404 to prevent taxpayer funding on ANY abortion care, no exceptions: “This is not a gimmick, this is not a joke. When the patron introduced this bill, he knew exactly what he was doing: targeting vulnerable survivors of rape, and women who could lose their lives if they have a life-threatening pregnancy. All of this is an attempt to hide behind just how cruel this bill actually is. The people of the Commonwealth deserve to know where their delegates stand on whether they live or die during childbirth.”

Bills that died on the Senate floor:

  • The Senate voted down SB78 (Favola) to require campaign ads that are independent expenditures to list the names of the organization’s top donors.
  • LG Winsome Sears broke a tie in opposition to SB712 (Marsden), that would have made it a crime to release hunting dogs on a highway.
  • Sears also broke a tie in opposition to SB643 (Aird) that would require courts to consider mitigating circumstances in finding someone in contempt of court for failing to appear.
  • The Senate recommitted SB107 (Suetterlein) from the floor back to the Committee on Privileges and Elections, effectively killing the bill without a recorded vote (since there were no further meetings of that committee). The bill would have prohibited legislators from accepting contributions during special sessions.

Bills that died on the House floor:

  • The bill (HB404 – Griffin) to prohibit taxpayer funding of any abortion care, without exceptions, failed to be engrossed to its final reading, with 95 nay votes.
  • HB179 (Gardner) that would allow sentences to be served concurrently rather than consecutively was passed by for the day several days, and ultimately went without a floor vote.
  • HB1406 (Fowler) to double the number of free fishing days (where no license is needed) failed to pass the House, despite having had bipartisan support in committees.
  • HB808 (Rasoul) that would have allowed state psychiatric hospitals to delay admitting a minor under a temporary detaining order if the minor has a life-threatening medical need the facility cannot meet. It was taken by for the day and did not get a floor vote.

Bills left in Appropriations/Finance:

  • For the 11th year, a bill to ban the personal use of campaign finance contributions (HB40 – Simon) died, this time left without a vote in House Appropriations.
  • In the Senate, SB326 (Roem) prohibiting contributions from public utilities was left to die without a vote in Finance after reporting from Privileges and Elections committee.
  • Paid Family and Medical Leave (HB737 – Sewell), reported on a party-line vote from Labor and Commerce, only to die quietly without a vote in Appropriations.
  • The Second Look legislation (HB834 – Cousins), which was being weaponized by AG Miyares and the GOP, was left behind in Appropriations. It would have created a petition process for someone who has worked to rehabilitate themselves while incarcerated to ask the judge to reconsider the length of the sentence.
  • HB1001 (Tran) and SB374 (Boysko) to allow state employees to collectively bargain, were left behind in House Appropriations and Senate Finance, respectively, without a vote.
  • A bill regulating the sales, advertisements and packaging of liquid nicotine and hemp products (HB1509 – Seibold) reported unanimously from General Laws and then was left in Appropriations without a vote.
  • The famous “Glenn-dome” bill (SB718 – Surovell) to build a sports and entertainment complex in Alexandria to host the Wizards and the Capitals, funded by bonds that are guaranteed by the Commonwealth, was loudly left to die in Senate Finance committee, although the House cognate (HB1514 – Torian) is still alive and crossed over to the Senate this week.