Home Blog Page 111

Marriage Equality Legislation Passes Virginia General Assembly, Heads to Gov. Youngkin’s Desk for [Hopefully] Signature

5

Great work by freshman Del. Rozia Henson and to Sen. Adam Ebbin on this important legislation. Also note how many Republicans voted against marriage equality in Virginia – and vote (Democratic) accordingly!

MARRIAGE EQUALITY LEGISLATION PASSES VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, HEADS TO GOVERNOR YOUNGKIN’S DESK FOR SIGNATURE

Bills introduced by Senator Adam Ebbin (D-Alexandria) and Delegate Rozia A. Henson, Jr. (D-Prince William) to codify marriage license protections for same-sex and interracial marriages pass General Assembly.

Senator Adam Ebbin’s (D-Alexandria) and Delegate Rozia Henson’s (D-Prince William) bills – Senate Bill 101 and House Bill 174 – have successfully passed both chambers of the Virginia General Assembly and head to Governor Glenn Youngkin’s desk for final signature.

Ebbin and Henson separately introduced SB 101 and HB 174 to guarantee the issuance of marriage licenses without regard to sex, gender or race of the two adults seeking to enter into a marriage.

“Virginians across the political spectrum have taken heart to see these bills receive bipartisan support in the General Assembly,” said Senator Ebbin (D-Alexandria). “I hope Governor Youngkin will sign this critical legislation to create state-level protections for all Virginians regardless of who they love.”

“Senator Ebbin and I introduced this legislation to codify marriage equality in Virginia’s Code so that all marriages are protected under Virginia law beginning July 1, 2024,” said Delegate Rozia A. Henson, Jr. (D-Prince William). “Codifying marriage equality will assuage concerns from the LGBTQ+ community in Virginia following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) reversal on abortion rights by the Supreme Court and Justice Thomas’ comments in his concurrence.”

Marriage equality opponents testified to legislators in 2023 that the ban on marriage equality should remain in Virginia’s Constitution, reasoning that “The [Supreme] Court is clearly in position to reverse its erroneous 2015 decision.”

Richmond City Councilmember Andreas Addison Announces Candidacy for Mayor

4

With Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney completing his second term and running for governor, the race to succeed him is starting to heat up. So far, candidates (per VPAP) include Michelle Mosby, Garrett Sawyer, Chris Hilbert, Maurice Neblett and Andreas Addison (see press release below). Also, presumably, others will throw their hats in the ring, so stay tuned…

Richmond City Councilmember Andreas Addison Announces Candidacy for Mayor

Richmond, Va. – Today, Richmond City Councilmember Andreas Addison announced his candidacy for mayor. Addison has served the 1st District on City Council since 2017 after an eight-year stint in City Hall, where he developed systems and programs to modernize Richmond’s approach to governance and growth.

“For over 15 years, I have served the City of Richmond both in City Hall and on Council, and over that time, I have seen firsthand the challenges that impede our ability to serve our residents effectively,” Addison said. “Good ideas that will help families and improve systems ultimately fail because of silos, fractured relationships, outdated systems, inadequate support for city staff, and a lack of political will to invest in long-term solutions. Shiny, new projects cannot be the cure-all for everything.”

“We have so much potential to solve these issues, especially in City Hall, but it’s going to take strong, focused leadership,” Addison added. “We need more than promises. We need a leader committed to doing the hard work, implementing progressive policies to move us forward, governing for the sustainable growth of Richmond, focusing on meeting the basic needs of residents, and preventing displacement. As Richmond’s next mayor, I will use my experience and vision to rise to these complex challenges.”

Before he was elected to City Council, Addison served in Richmond City Hall for eight years, working as a management analyst and civic innovator, where he spearheaded initiatives to improve City operations to better address service needs and enhance both efficiency and effectiveness.

Elected to council in 2016, Addison quickly developed a reputation for pursuing innovative solutions to the city’s problems, including efforts to invest $10 million into the affordable housing trust fund, preserving fare-free transit on GRTC and providing a 40% pay raise for bus drivers, removing outdated zoning to help small businesses, pioneering Safe Streets for All, and creating a resident-led participatory budgeting commission so Richmonders can play an active role in how the city’s capital budget is allocated.

He also lobbied the General Assembly to create the Commission on School Construction and Modernization to expand state-level funding support for aging school buildings, where over half of all schools in Virginia are at least 50 years old and in need of significant repair. That legislative effort resulted in bipartisan recommendations to add new funding mechanisms for local school divisions to leverage for maintenance, renovation, and construction projects.

Addison was born and raised in Virginia. He was raised by his single mother, who worked as a waitress. He grew up in the Shenandoah Valley with his mom and stepdad and his younger brother. At 12, Addison left school briefly to help care for his younger brother while also homeschooling himself to keep up with his education. He later began working at 14 to help support his family.

“I know what it’s like to be a child who has to grow up too fast, to feel the weight of the world on your shoulders,” Addison said. “I also know what it’s like for one of my main meals to be the free lunch at school. I believe all children and young people deserve the opportunity to learn and grow into healthy and successful adults, and that starts by providing them with a strong foundation for their future. My administration will prioritize initiatives that break the cycle of generational poverty, uplift and empower working families, and enable our youth to reach their full potential.”

Addison went on to graduate from Virginia Tech with a degree in political science and later earned his MBA from the University of Richmond. He is currently a small business owner of Pure Fitness RVA. He is an adjunct professor at the University of Virginia, educating students about human-centered design through social enterprise.

“As I tell my students, we must see people beyond the numbers on paper,” Addison noted. “I know this from personal experience. Honestly, the decisions the mayor should be making need to be transformational to improve access to employment, services, and other needs for low-income households. Yes, that even includes a full-service grocery store in the Southside. The disproportionate gaps we see in our communities across race, income, and zip code must be our driving factor to make change.”

“As mayor, I look forward to working with community leaders, City Council, City staff, business owners, advocates, and everyday Richmonders to ensure our city reaches its full potential and no one is left behind.”

In the coming weeks, Addison’s campaign will host a launch event and release policy priorities.

###

About Andreas Addison

Andreas Addison is a public servant, small business owner, and educator serving the Richmond community for more than 15 years. Addison represents the 1st District on Richmond City Council, where he has a proven track record of fighting for affordable housing, greater connectivity in the region, and investments for greater city services. He is the owner of Pure Fitness RVA in Scott’s Addition and an adjunct professor at UVA in the School of Public Policy. A strong advocate for thriving communities, Addison is committed to a socially equitable, environmentally sustainable, and prosperous Richmond for working families. Addison married his wife, Allison, in 2023, and the couple resides in the Museum District. Join the movement at andreasaddison.com.

Virginia Latino Caucus Releases Crossover Update

2

From the Virginia Latino Caucus:

Virginia Latino Caucus Releases Crossover Update

RICHMOND, VA – The Virginia Latino Caucus (VLC) wishes to highlight the status of its policy priorities at Crossover, the moment in session where the Virginia Senate and House of Delegates review bills that have passed in the opposite chamber. At the time of writing, the VLC’s bill statuses include 16 bills that have passed their respective chambers6 bills that were continued to 2025, and 3 bills that were left in a committee.

VLC Delegates Alfonso López, Michelle Lopes Maldonado, Phil Hernández, and Marty Martínez remain committed to shepherding Latino priorities through the General Assembly, including support for English Language Learner (ELL) students, affordable healthcare, criminal justice reforms, support for New Americans, and aiding Virginia’s undocumented community.

Education

HB 211, sponsored by Delegate Martínez, was continued to 2025 in a House Education subcommittee. The bill would have changed from once every seven years to every two years the frequency with which the Department of Education is required to audit each education preparation program for compliance with relevant law relating to student coursework and mastery in science-based reading research and evidence-based literacy instruction.

HB 386, sponsored by Delegate Hernández, was continued to 2025 in a House Appropriations subcommittee.  The bill would have increased the number of specialized student support positions required to be employed by each local school board from at least three to at least four such positions per 1,000 students in the local school division . Such specialized student support positions would have included school social workers, school psychologists, school nurses, licensed behavior analysts, licensed assistant behavior analysts, and other licensed health and behavioral positions.

HB 1247, sponsored by Delegate Lopes Maldonado, passed the House of Delegates on a 58-41 floor vote and was referred to the Senate Education and Health Committee. The bill requires state funding to be provided to support divisionwide ratios of ELL students in average daily membership to full-time equivalent teaching positions.

SB 272, sponsored by Senator Hashmi,  unanimously passed the Senate and was referred to the House Education Committee. The bill requires the Department of Education to develop and implement a data collection process related to ELL expenditures and student English proficiency levels, and identify other options to support English language learners

SB 227 , sponsored by Senator Hashmi, was incorporated into Senator Lucas’ SB 105.  SB 105 unanimously passed the Senate and was referred to the House Education K-12 Subcommittee. The original bill would adjust Standards of Quality (SoQ) funding calculations performed by the Department of Education.

SB 228, sponsored by Senator Hashmi, was incorporated into Senator Lucas’ SB 105.  SB 105 unanimously passed the Senate and was referred to the House Education K-12 Subcommittee. The original bill would require state funding to be provided to cover the actual average school division cost to educate children with disabilities and a per-pupil SoQ funding add-on for English language learner (ELL) and special education students.

Housing

HB 192, sponsored by Delegate Martínez, was left in a House General Laws subcommittee. It would have established the Landlord and Tenant Fairness Act that requires any landlord who owns more than nine rental units or more than a 10 percent interest in more than nine rental units to meet certain requirements with respect to the advertisement of any rental unit, the charging of application fees, and terms of rental agreements.

HB 955, sponsored by Delegate López, passed the House of Delegates on a 51-48 floor vote and was referred to the Senate General Laws and Technology Committee. The bill would require landlords (at the request of the tenant) to include a summary page with any written rental agreement offered to a prospective tenant in a language other than English in an area where that language is commonly used. The summary page shall include the duration of the lease, the amount of rent and the date upon which such rent shall be due, an explanation of any deposits and late fees that may be charged, and any termination provisions.

HB 957, sponsored by Delegate López, passed the House of Delegates on a 69-29 floor vote and was referred to the Senate General Laws and Technology Committee. The bill provides a rebuttable presumption of a landlord’s noncompliance with the rental agreement if the leased premises was condemned by an appropriate authority due to the owner’s refusal or failure to fix a condition for which he was served a condemnation notice. The bill requires a court, when such rebuttable presumption is established, to award the tenant the amount of three months’ rent, any prepaid rent, and any security deposit paid by the tenant.

Healthcare

HB 970, sponsored by Delegate Tran, was left in the House Appropriations Committee. It would have established a health coverage program in Virginia available to children from low-income families regardless of immigration status.

SB 231, sponsored by Senator Hashmi, passed the Senate on a 21-19 floor vote and was referred to the House Health and Human Services Social Services Subcommittee. It would establish a health coverage program in Virginia available to children from low-income families regardless of immigration status.

Immigration

HB 956, sponsored by Delegate López, was left in the House Appropriations Committee. It would have reduced from 12 months to 364 days the maximum term of confinement in jail for a Class 1 misdemeanor.

SB 332, sponsored by Senator Salim, passed the Senate on a 21-19 floor vote and has been referred to the House Courts of Justice Committee. It would reduce from 12 months to 364 days the maximum term of confinement in jail for a Class 1 misdemeanor.

HB 962, sponsored by Delegate López, passed the House of Delegates on a 53-47 floor vote and has been referred to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee. It would remove the term “alien” as it pertains to persons who are not citizens or nationals of the United States and replace it with synonymous language throughout the Code of Virginia.

Workers’ Protections

HB 1, sponsored by Delegate Ward, passed the House of Delegates on a 51-49 floor vote and has been referred to the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee . It increases the minimum wage from the current rate of $12.00 per hour to $13.50 per hour effective January 1, 2025, and to $15.00 per hour effective January 1, 2026.

HB 157, sponsored by Delegate McClure, passed the House of Delegates in a 50-49 floor vote and has been referred to the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee. The bill eliminates the exemptions from Virginia’s minimum wage requirements for persons employed as farm laborers or farm employees and certain temporary foreign workers.

Taxes and Social Services

HB 407, sponsored by Delegate Hernández, unanimously passed the House of Delegates in a floor vote. It has been referred to the Senate Education and Health Public Education subcommittee. The bill provides that any family that receives public assistance through Medicaid or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children be deemed categorically eligible to receive assistance through the Child Care Subsidy Program.

HB 408, sponsored by Delegate Hernández, was continued to 2025  in a House Appropriations subcommittee. The bill would have required that the Department of Education periodically reimburse child care providers that are vendors through the Child Care Subsidy Program on the basis of authorized child enrollment.

HB 621/SB 183, sponsored by Delegate Price and Senator Rouse, were respectively continued to 2025. The bills would have allowed eligible low-income taxpayers to claim a refundable income tax credit equal to 20 percent of the federal earned income tax credit claimed that year by the taxpayer for the same taxable year. The bills also state that individuals who would have been entitled to the federal equivalent of this credit but for the fact that the individual, the individual’s spouse, or one or more of the individual’s children does not have a valid social security number would be eligible to claim this credit.

HB 969, sponsored by Delegate Tran, was continued to 2025 in a Finance subcommittee. The bill would have created a tax credit for taxable years 2024 through 2028 for individuals whose households include dependents younger than the age of 18. The bill provided that the amount of the credit will be equal to $500 for each such dependent whose family Virginia adjusted gross income (AGI) does not exceed $100,000.

Public Safety and Judicial

HB 470, sponsored by Delegate Martínez, passed on a 75-23  full vote in the House of Delegates and unanimously passed the Senate Courts of Justice Committee . The bill moves to increase transparency in court processes by allowing families, with adequate evidence, who were previously denied a petition in the court to be reevaluated and have the petition filed by another designated professional.

HB 972, sponsored by Delegate López, passed a full vote in the House of Delegates. It passed on a 51-47 vote and was referred to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee. The bill provides that no Virginia court shall inquire into the immigration status of any defendant unless such inquiry is relevant to the offense for which such defendant is being prosecuted. It also requires that before the start of proceedings, Virginia courts shall advise any defendant that immigration consequences are possible if such defendant is convicted of a criminal violation of state or local law.

HB 1454/SB 246, sponsored by Delegate López and Senator McPike, passed their respective chambers. HB 1454 passed on a 55-44 vote and SB 246 passed on a 21-19 vote. These bills extend the validity of limited-duration licenses and driver privilege cards and permits to match the validity of driver’s licenses under current law.

###

The Virginia Latino Caucus (VLC) is the legislative caucus representing Virginia’s diverse Hispanic and Latino community in the Virginia General Assembly. The VLC’s mission is to advance legislation and policies in the General Assembly that will improve the lives of Latinos, New Americans, and other underrepresented communities across the Commonwealth. This email was sent out by Lopez for Delegate on behalf of the Virginia Latino Caucus. 

 

 

Wednesday News: “FBI informant said Russian intelligence involved in Hunter Biden story”; “Yes, Trump wants Christian theocracy”; “Biden has canceled nearly $138 billion in student loan debt so far”; “Alabama ushers in the theocracy”

33

by Lowell

Here are a few international, national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Wednesday, February 21.

Video: VA State Senators Honor Their Former Colleague, Rep. Jennifer Wexton (D-VA10) For Her Kindness, Friendship, Dedication, Hard Work, etc.

5

UPDATED 8:45 pm Tuesday: Here’s the full video, with all the tributes to Rep. Jennifer Wexton (D-VA10), including from Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell (D), Sen. Jeremy McPike (D), Sen. Adam Ebbin (D), Sen. Jennifer Boysko (D), Sen. Lamont Bagby (D)…and all of those listed below.

Today in the Virginia State Senate, there were numerous emotional tributes to former State Senator – and current US Congresswoman – Jennifer Wexton (D-VA10), who unfortunately is battling a very serious disease – Progressive Supra-nuclear Palsy, type-p – and has announced that she will not be running for reelection.

So, today on the floor of the VA State Senate, where Rep. Wexton served from 2014 to 2019, many of her former colleagues stood up and spoke about her. I didn’t capture all of it, as they kept going back and forth between tributes to Wexton and other business, but the following videos have the tributes by Sen. Russet Perry (D), (the end of remarks by) Sen. Barbara Favola (D), Sen. Dave Marsden (D), Sen. Mamie Locke, Sen. Danica Roem (D), Sen. Ghazala Hashmi (D), Sen. Dave Suetterlein (R), Sen. Bill. Stanley (R), (the end of remarks by) Sen. Christie New Craig (R), Sen. Suhas Subramanyam (D), Sen. Bill DeSteph (R), Sen. Ryan McDougle (R) and Sen. Stella Pekarsky (D). Over and over again, Senators spoke about Wexton’s humanity, kindness, great sense of humor, hard work, resourcefulness, dedication and many other great qualities (we can all just wish that our colleagues would have such great things to say about us!). Very moving, and clearly well deserved by Jennifer Wexton!

US Supreme Court Declines to Take Up Appeal to Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (“TJ”) Admissions Policies

10

It’s definitely surprising that this right-wing Supreme Court didn’t take the case on a “diversity-enhancing but race-blind admissions policy” (as SCOTUS reporter Steven Mazie put it – see below) at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (“TJ”) in Fairfax County.

The decision from the high court not to take up the appeal by a group of parents challenging the admissions policies at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology leaves intact a lower court decision upholding the criteria, which school officials argue is race neutral. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concluded last year that the goal of the program is to foster diversity among the school’s student body, though the parents that brought the case said it impermissibly discriminated against Asian-American students. 

Note that the dissents were by Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who are the two most far-right/”out there” Justices on the Supreme Court. Anyway, it’s good news, and hopefully that will be the end of litigation and fighting (which has been going on for over 3 years at this point) over TJ’s admission policies.

P.S. For some background on this case, see Supreme Court Leaves Admissions Policy for Northern Virginia’s Thomas Jefferson School for Science & Technology (“TJ”) in Place…For Now.; Video: Debate Gets *VERY* Heated in Senate Education Committee as Bill to Increase Diversity at Virginia “Governor’s Schools” Is Debated…and Defeated (Sen. Petersen claims the bill “stigmatize[s] a very hard-working community in Fairfax County which I am proud to represent and be married into”; Sen. Locke responded, “there’s always this stone wall, and we’re hearing it here this morning from some of our own members sitting here”); Video: Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology Alumni Speak in Support of Merit Lottery Plan (“It’s not about perfect representation, it’s just an equal chance.”); Fairfax County NAACP Announces Support for “Merit Lottery” Changes to “TJ” Admissions Process; Thomas Jefferson High School Alumni Action Group Endorses Merit Lottery System for “TJ” Admissions (“A merit lottery will bring in talent that will thrive at Jefferson but can’t afford years of test prep.”); etc.

Team Biden-Harris Raises More Than $42M in January 2024, Historic $130M War Chest (Highest Total of Any Democratic Candidate in History)

4

Good news from the Biden-Harris campaign:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

February 20, 2024

Team Biden-Harris Raises More Than $42M in January 2024, Historic $130M War Chest

Team Biden-Harris Raised Nearly $278 Million Since April Launch

Raises More Than $42 Million in January Alone

$130 Million in Cash on Hand, Highest Total of Any Democratic Candidate in History

Today, Team Biden-Harris announced that it raised more than $42 million in January, starting the year with a powerful display of enthusiasm, strength, and historic resources heading into the election year. The team is also reporting a historic $130 million in cash on hand, the highest total amassed by any Democratic candidate in history at this point in the cycle. Team Biden-Harris’ cash on hand has increased each of the four reporting periods since the president launched his reelection.

Team Biden-Harris’ Q4 haul was driven in large part by the strength of our grassroots support, which continued to grow in Q4. January was our strongest grassroots fundraising month since launch—the third consecutive record breaking month for our grassroots program.

“January’s fundraising haul – driven by a powerhouse grassroots fundraising program that continues to grow month by month – is an indisputable show of strength to start the election year,” said Julie Chavez Rodriguez, Biden-Harris 2024 Campaign Manager. “While Team Biden-Harris continues to build on its fundraising machine, Republicans are divided – either spending money fighting Donald Trump, or spending money in support of Donald Trump’s extreme and losing agenda. Either way, judging from their weak fundraising, they’re already paying the political price. In an election that will determine the fate of our democracy and our freedoms, President Biden’s campaign is using its resources to build a winning operation that will meet voters where they are about the stakes of this election.”

“We are particularly proud that January shattered our grassroots fundraising record for a third straight month,” said Senior Communications Advisor TJ Ducklo. “This haul will go directly to reaching the voters who will decide this election. That’s reason number 355 million that we are confident President Biden and Vice President Harris will win this November.”

January’s strong showing comes after a historic 2023 haul where Team Biden-Harris posted the largest war chest in history: $117 million cash on hand. This was the highest total amassed by any Democratic candidate in history at that point in the cycle, and more than the Republican field and party combined.

Let’s run through the numbers:

Team Biden-Harris Grew Its Grassroots Program in January:

  • January was our strongest grassroots fundraising month since launch—making it the third consecutive record-breaking month for grassroots fundraising.
  • In January alone, Team Biden-Harris added more than 1 million emails to our email list – already the largest email list ever for a Democratic presidential candidate.
  • High-profile moments continue to motivate our grassroots donors: we raised $1 million each day in the three days after the Iowa Republican caucus, and averaged $1 million 24-hour hauls in the days leading up to the end-of-the-month deadline.

Today’s strong numbers reflect efforts across the campaign, DNC, and its joint fundraising committees:

  • In January, 422,000 unique donors made 502,000 contributions to Team Biden-Harris.
  • Since launch, 97% of all our donations were under $200 and 1.1 million donors have made nearly 3 million contributions.
  • Additionally, we now have more than 158,000 sustaining donors who have committed to donating every month—more than double the amount at this point in the 2020 cycle.
  • Donors hailed from all 50 states and all walks of life, with teachers and nurses as some of the most common occupations among donors.

“January’s unprecedented fundraising numbers underscore the grassroots momentum to send  Joe Biden and Kamala Harris back to the White House, and elect Democrats up and down the ballot this November,” said DNC Chair Jaime Harrison. “From coast to coast, Americans are rallying together to safeguard our democracy and defend our freedoms in a historic way. As this election year kicks into full gear, Team Biden-Harris and the DNC stand united, leveraging the power of grassroots donors to propel Democrats to victory at every level.”

President Biden’s 2020 campaign raised over $1 billion, the most money of any presidential campaign in history, which included $700 million online driven by small dollar donations – also the most in history. With President Biden at the top of the ticket, ActBlue saw over 133 million separate donations in the 2020 cycle with 71% being first-time donors.

###

Paid for by Biden for President

Tuesday News: “BloombergNEF says global solar installations could hit 574 GW this year”; “Trump’s bizarre deference to Putin is not new”; “Pelosi: Trump comments on Navalny’s death ‘beneath the dignity of a human being’”; “How Merrick Garland Mistook a Trump Hitman for a Career Prosecutor”

35

by Lowell

Here are a few international, national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, February 20.

“Joe Biden is the best candidate to beat Donald Trump in just 9 months. Even if he wasn’t, there is no time left and there are no alternatives.” – Kaivan Shroff

8

Fantasies and hand-wringing aside, at this point in the 2024 election cycle – if you’re even remotely conscious, awake, informed, and in touch with reality – it’s pretty much impossible to deny the near-certainty that this November, we will face a choice on our ballots between President Joe Biden (and the continuation of our democracy) and former President Donald Trump (and the end of our democracy, many of our rights and liberties, etc.)

Sure, you can *WISH* that there were different likely nominees, but as the saying goes, “wishing doesn’t make it so.” Which is why it’s SO annoying to see some liberals, progressives, Democrats, and a few “never Trumpers” like Bill Kristol, STILL wasting time and energy on pushing for an alternative to President Biden. But actually, it’s even worst than just wasting time and energy; it’s actively harmful – divisive, distracting, etc. – to be doing that at this point, at least on the Democratic side, given that near-100% certainty that President Biden will – and SHOULD BE, given how effective he’s been as president – our nominee in 2024.

With that in mind, see below or at this link for a brilliant thread by Kaivan Shroff on this topic. Shroff’s thread is brilliant and should be *read, internalized, and shared* by every Democrat – and “small-d democrat” as well – who isn’t “in denial” and who sincerely wants to save our country from a very, very dark fate if Trump (god forbid) wins this November. Anyway, I wanted to share Shroff’s thread here, in part to amplify it and in part so that I always have a link to send to anyone who starts blabbering on about how Joe Biden is “too old” (FALSE!) or how Biden should step aside for…someone (note that this would trigger a very messy, divisive nomination fight that could easily tear the party apart, at a time when we absolutely can’t afford that). As Shroff writes, at this point:

Joe Biden is the best candidate to beat Donald Trump in just 9 months. Even if he wasn’t, there is no time left and there are no alternatives.

We are now deep into the election season where we are trying to execute our collective goal – defeating a man who poses an existential threat to our democracy.

Either those who consider themselves part of the pro-democracy coalition want to be a productive part of that success or they are merely standing in the way.

That’s it – so time to get a grip and start organizing, mentally preparing, etc. for the fight of our lives!

Biden Supporters Aren’t in Denial, Everyone Else Is

There’s a persistent narrative among beltway pundits and even some well-meaning armchair campaigners that pro-Biden Democrats like me are “in denial” about President Joe Biden’s advanced age.

Ironically, what has become clear as we are dragged through yet another “but Biden’s age” newscycle is that we are perhaps the only ones engaging rationally on the issue. Joe Biden is old; You won’t hear me or other pro-Biden Democratic operatives argue otherwise.

However, with just 9 months until the election, he is also the only person standing between Trump and the White House. The incessant discussion around the president’s age is derivative of a media-induced fever dream that some better candidate exists and that such a candidate would succeed in defeating Trump with just months left until election day.

As time passes, those who prioritize keeping Trump out of the White House, but predominantly focus on Biden’s age, are the ones actually in denial.

As we edge closer to the election, the mainstream Democratic response to the rehashed dialogue on Biden’s age is not only logical but necessary. It reflects a broader misapprehension among some observers who fail to grasp the urgency of the impending electoral contest.

Despite facing an unprecedented number of legal challenges, including 91 felony counts, the possibility of Trump’s political resurgence in 2024 is not to be underestimated. This scenario underscores the paramount importance of Biden’s candidacy.

Joe Biden is the single best positioned person on the planet to defeat Donald Trump this November, as he did in 2020. As an incumbent president who can run for re-election on a strong economy, Biden has two formidable advantages in the general election.

Moreover, he has already earned the vote of over 81 million Americans before and has been vetted on a national stage for decades.

Those who disagree with the assertion that Biden is Democrats’ best chance to keep the White House had several years to identify and elevate someone better. (No such candidate materialized because one does not exist.)

Now Biden is sweeping the primary contests around the nation, even winning a rare write-in contest in New Hampshire a few weeks ago. It will soon be mathematically impossible for any challenger to secure the Democratic nomination.

Some delusional scenario where the party instead anoints a Biden replacement at the Democratic National Convention in August, just over 3 months away from election day, and then that candidate goes on to defeat Trump is beyond even Aaron Sorkin’s imagination.

The insistence on revisiting Biden’s age, therefore, is pointless and a distraction from the objective at hand — the focus of anyone who considers themselves part of the pro-democracy coalition should be defeating Trump this November.

Worse, focusing on the president’s age, which cannot be changed, only serves to weaken our best and only chance at defeating Trump — who is also old. The issue should therefore be neutralized, not weaponized against our own candidate.

The execution of any plan, whether in politics, business, or any other field, involves distinct phases. There is initially an ideation period, followed by selection of a course of action, then implementation.

Initially, the brainstorming phase welcomes a wide array of ideas, encouraging rigorous scrutiny to identify potential pitfalls, blind spots, and obstacles.

Yet, as the focus shifts toward implementation, the relevance of certain critiques — such as those concerning Biden’s age — diminishes significantly. We are now well into the implementation phase of our plan to stop Trump and save democracy.

Consider the analogy of launching a product. A team is coalescing around a product that is blue. During the ideation period one member of the team notes “not everybody likes blue.” It’s a valid, even helpful, point that should be considered.

However, should the team decide to produce the blue product anyway – after weighing alternatives – the utility of that same employee incessantly reminding everyone now working towards successfully launching the product that, indeed, not everybody likes blue diminishes greatly.

Certainly, coworkers who grew weary of the redundant discussion would not be considered “in denial.” Similarly, with the election on the horizon and Biden as the Democratic nominee, the party’s collective efforts must be directed toward ensuring his success.

Continual fixation on his age not only fails to advance this objective but risks impeding it.

Democrats who are tired of talking about Biden’s age don’t think we’re keeping some great secret. We are wide awake to the realities of this political moment in ways that our critics apparently are not. A few things are certain.

Joe Biden is the best candidate to beat Donald Trump in just 9 months. Even if he wasn’t, there is no time left and there are no alternatives.

We are now deep into the election season where we are trying to execute our collective goal – defeating a man who poses an existential threat to our democracy.

Either those who consider themselves part of the pro-democracy coalition want to be a productive part of that success or they are merely standing in the way.

How Elite Cowardice Threatens America’s Future

5

By Kindler (Please check out my Substack)

It is hard for me to express the sinking feeling I had the week before, listening to the oral arguments before the Supreme Court about Trump’s eligibility to run for president. It was like having been thrown off a ship and waiting for somebody, anybody to throw you a life preserver – but watching no one do so, not even the passengers you thought were your friends.

What bugged me was that none of them seriously addressed the issue of Trump’s insurrectionist act of attempting to overturn the 2020 election, including by inciting mob violence. Several of the right-wing Justices mocked and downplayed the idea that the horrific assault on our democracy culminating on January 6th, 2021 was anything unusual, with the supposedly more moderate Chief Justice John Roberts even claiming that “Insurrection is a broad, broad term.”

Really? Our nation’s highest authorities on what our laws mean and how to enforce them think that this Constitutionally proscribed, dangerous act is just plain undefinable? Any of us can in fact find a legal definition of insurrection on the Web within minutes – e.g., “A rising or rebellion of citizens against their government, usually manifested by acts of violence” – and with more time, can trace the history of how it’s been used in US history, as dozens of historians did in crafting amicus briefs to the Court, which appear to have been roundly ignored.

Why did even the Democratically appointed Justices shy away from discussing the grave danger that Trump poses to American democracy, instead diverting the discussion to all kinds of lesser issues? I’m sure that lots of commentators have lots of theories about it, but I would sum the biggest reason up in one word: cowardice.

It’s the Cowardice, Stupid!

Scholars of history and political science have long debated the philosophical question of whether history is written by the actions of individuals or by impersonal forces – demographic, evolutionary, climatic, economic, etc. – acting upon us. While the obvious answer is “a combination of both”, academia has long preferred to focus on the objective forces that they can measure, submit to statistical tests, and so on rather than having to evaluate and judge the messy actions of human beings.

But of course, this approach is both disempowering and causes one to miss many opportunities history has had to take a different course. Right now, as so many have observed, American democracy faces deep, unusual threats to its existence, and whether it succeeds or fails will depend on the decisions and actions of many people, from the humblest plebe to the most powerful patrician.

While all of us have a critical role to play, it’s no secret that some people have a lot more power over our society than others – namely, the elites of every field, from law to journalism to academia to business.  But the rise of Trump has laid bare our national leadership crisis – that a huge portion of the American elite lacks the courage to stand up to those who would threaten the foundations of our democratic society.  They don’t want to risk pissing off people who may threaten them with harm or even just verbally attack them on social media. Their reaction to bullies is to keep their heads down so that they don’t get bullied next – rather than trying to help all the victims who are way more vulnerable than them.

Stoking the Fears of Corporate and Republican Weasels

It’s important to understand this because a large portion of the strategy of Trump and the MAGA movement is actually focused on stoking and leveraging elite cowardice to its own political and economic benefit.

Take the so-called “War on Woke” (this word salad itself a war on the English language) and the related assaults on the corporate ESG (environmental, social and governance) movement. Republicans know full well that many corporate executives secured their positions not through anything resembling courage or even leadership, but to the contrary, have moved up the ranks based on their ability to avoid hard decisions or risks while keeping their own butts securely covered.

So right wing propagandists like Chris Rufo (mastermind of both the “CRT” and trans scares) know that if they can label anything they do not perceive to be in their interest as “controversial” and potentially costly to executives, they can count on these suits to run away from doing the good work that they have pledged to do.

Sacly, there is ample evidence that these scare tactics work.  As Bill McKibben recently reported, both Bank of America and British bank HSBC recently reneged on climate commitments they had made to stop providing financing to new fossil fuel ventures. He quotes the New York Times on the likely reason:

“Bank of America’s change follows intensifying backlash from Republican lawmakers against corporations that consider environmental and social factors in their operations. Wall Street in particular has come under fire for what some Republicans have called ‘woke capitalism,’ a campaign that has pulled banks into the wider culture wars.”

Cowardice, yes, or viewed from another perspective, cynicism – Republican politicians soaked in oil money giving corporate America cover to do what they want to do anyway, just focus on short term profits and not give a damn about the consequences of their actions on people or the planet.

Trump’s political and legal strategies are similarly aimed at stoking the cowardice and exhaustion of anyone who might oppose him. No, he’s not simply a random babbler, but he often says and does things for a conscious reason. His gangsterish taunting of Nikki Haley after the New Hampshire primary was only the latest of so many examples over his twisted political career:

“And just a little note to Nikki…She would be under investigation by those people in 15 minutes, and I could tell you five reasons why already. Not big reasons, little stuff she doesn’t want to talk about. But she will be under investigation within minutes.”

As always with this thug, he is not only threatening a rival to fall into line but sending a not-at-all subtle message to everyone else he can reach – kiss my pinky ring or I will end your career.  And Republicans, remembering how the likes of Reps. Lynn Cheney, Adam Kinzinger got drummed out of the party, respond like frightened sheep.  There are too many cases to mention, though Sen. Tim Scott’s self-abasement was a recent, painful example to watch.

Bullies and Victims

The terrifying logic of fascism divides society into two major groups: bullies and victims.  Both are essential to making this warped system work.  Attacking victims both verbally and physically is a regular fascist ritual that binds the dictators’ supporters together through the cleansing act of putting the scum in their place.

You can try to back away into a third category of bystander, but…lots of luck not being pulled in by the irresistible force of a society based on the foundation of forcing its citizens into perpetual conflict and misery.  So, while trying to hide from all the conflict –  turning away when you see immigrants or black people or whomever being beaten up –  may be the natural instinct of a coward, in fact it is a lot safer in a society devolving into fascism to show yourself to be one of the bullies.

Hence the nefarious tendency of fascism to push more and more regular people to become monsters in order to save their own skins.  The louder you shout against “the communists” or “the Jews” or “the illegals”, the less likely you will be viewed as an ally of these targeted groups and thus a potential target yourself.

Bullying thus becomes the last refuge of the coward fighting to secure his or her position in an increasingly chaotic society.  So the Republicans, corporate execs, media titans and others desperate to get the bullies off their back end up bullying the usual suspects as a way to show their loyalty.

Again, there are more examples than one can name.  Coming back to the Supreme Court’s oral arguments over Colorado’s bid to remove Trump from the ballot, Dahlia Lithwick correctly noted Justice Alito’s, Robert’s and Gorsuch’s bullying posture against the lawyer for the plaintiffs:

“And the thing…we hadn’t talked about enough is the mob-like threat that emerged from some justices, like—nice democracy you got, it’d be a shame if something happened to it. By that I mean, there was this subtle threat, right? And it starts in Jonathan Mitchell’s briefing, when he says there’ll be all sorts of chaos and mayhem and violence if Trump is removed from the ballot. There was a question from Chief Justice John Roberts about how, if the court sides with Colorado, Republicans are going to knock Democrats off the ballot next. It’s there in Justice Samuel Alito’s questioning about vexatious, frivolous lawsuits that will surely follow.”

You can see the bullying in Trumpist Special Counsel Hur’s gratuitous attacks on President Biden in his report, going well beyond his legal mandate. You can see it in the “Guardian Angels” beating up alleged immigrants in New York City live on Sean Hannity’s show.  You can see it in all the legal, political and personal attacks on trans people, a tiny minority that poses no threat to anyone but is easy to isolate and scapegoat.  You can see it in all the years of dishonest attacks on Dr. Fauci, a recently retired civil servant who dedicated so many years to his job – now serving as one of the foundations of Robert Kennedy’s conspiracy-theory driven presidential campaign.

The Value of Reward and Punishment

While many members of the elite – outside the GOP anyway – resist the urge to join the bullying frenzy, they too frequently enable it by failing to stand up to the bullies strongly enough to make a difference.  These are the people, quite frankly, whose spines we need to stiffen – by setting an example ourselves of speaking truth to power and by singling out for praise or condemnation whoever may do the right or the wrong thing.

On this last point, I have to note that every time on social media when I compliment the words or actions of someone with whom I or my allies may disagree frequently – say, Mitt Romney or Liz Cheney – my feed always includes someone saying that I shouldn’t do so because they’re wrong on [x] or did [y] bad thing in the past. These critics are missing the point of how much more bravery it takes a Republican to stand up to the MAGA crowd, when their entire party has been taken over by these violent, angry hordes.

If you want to see your leaders act bravely, you have to reward them for engaging in even isolated moments of courage. Those who choose to be in the public eye are rarely indifferent to how people feel about them, which gives us the power to at least sometimes influence their behavior by giving or withholding our praise.  I mean, it’s how most of us work, as do our babies, dogs and (well, occasionally) cats.

We similarly have to push our leaders – in all fields, from politics and the media to sports and entertainment – to move beyond their comfort zones and be braver in doing all they can to stop America’s slide toward fascism. Because having power often does mean being comfortable in life, which brings with it the risk of losing some of that comfort if you dare rock the boat.

But we are past the point at which anyone in America can just try to hide away and expect to ride out the storm at a time when we have a presidential candidate promising to be a dictator on Day One – the same guy who incited a violent rebellion that breached the U.S. Capitol, the center of US democracy, the last time he lost.

Cowardice is contagious, but so is courage. We need to find the latter in our hearts and spread it far and wide until enough of us stand up to the monsters to finally, decisively stop them in their tracks.