Home Blog Page 113

Friday News: “Alexei Navalny, Putin’s Most Ardent Critic, Dies in Prison”; “Trump Is at Odds With NATO — and Reality”; “Trump to stand trial on March 25 in NY criminal hush money case”; “FBI informant charged with lying about Joe and Hunter Biden’s ties to Ukrainian energy company”

33

by Lowell

Here are a few international, national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, February 16.

Good Reasons For Suing a Medical Professional

2

SPONSORED CONTENT

Good Reasons For Suing a Medical Professional

A doctor’s office in New York is the last place you would expect to suffer an injury. Unfortunately, errors can occur during a visit to the doctor or a hospital, and they can become the beginning of your pain and suffering.

Since most medical professionals intend to do well, suing them when things go wrong may not feel like the best thing to do, but there are some good reasons you may need to, as highlighted in this guide.

To Cover the Costs of Treatment

While you may not like suing your doctor, piling medical bills after an injury resulting from their negligence may force you to. Also, the doctor will most likely not compensate you out-of-pocket. Instead, their insurer will cover their liability.

However, it doesn’t mean that they will not feel the impact of the claims, as it can result in costlier premiums.

“It doesn’t always have to get to the point where you sue. In some cases, their insurer can opt for a settlement that doesn’t involve suing, but it is important to involve a lawyer in such a situation to ensure you do not get a raw deal,” says New York personal injury lawyer John H. Fisher of The New York Injury & Malpractice Law Firm, P.C.

Making the Healthcare Industry Safer

The standards of care have improved significantly in the healthcare sector in the past few years and claims against negligent medical professionals and hospitals have played a critical role.

When healthcare providers know that their actions can result in lawsuits, they tend to be more careful to avoid situations that could give rise to lawsuits. Health providers use lost lawsuits as a lesson and use it to create safer approaches to treatment. So, by suing for medical malpractice, you will be helping prevent harm to future patients.

To Hold Medical Professionals Accountable

Most medical professionals diligently ensure they get the best outcomes for their patients. When errors result in injuries in such cases, you probably wouldn’t want to get anything from them other than compensation for harm suffered.

However, there are some cases where the injuries could result from gross negligence or intentional tort, in which case you would feel the need to have the medical professionals held accountable for their actions by suing them. In some cases, holding them accountable could include having them criminally charged, in which case you may have to leave the case to the prosecution.

Common Types of Clams Against Medical Professionals

Several situations can give rise to a medical malpractice claim against a medical professional or institution. These situations include:

  • Misdiagnosis, Delayed Diagnosis And Failure To Diagnose: These situations mean a condition fails to be identified in time, resulting in deterioration and more complicated treatment. In some cases, such as cancer, it could mean a significantly decreased chance of survival. A misdiagnosis could also mean getting the wrong treatment, resulting in harm rather than the intended good.
  • Surgical Errors: Surgical errors occur during surgery and include leaving surgical equipment inside a patient, operating on the wrong body part, operating on the wrong patient, conducting unnecessary operations, etc.
  • Medication Errors: These are errors that occur during drug prescription and dispensing. They include issuing the wrong dosage, prescription mix-ups and can involve the treating doctor, the dispensing nurse or pharmacists.
  • Other Errors: Anesthesia errors, pregnancy care, birth injuries, and failure to monitor are also common causes of injury and can give grounds for filing a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Medical malpractice lawsuits can be quite complex, and it’s almost impossible to succeed with your claim without a lawyer who specializes in medical malpractice.

VIDEO: Senator Hashmi, Delegate Price Celebrate Legislative Milestone in the Fight to Protect Contraception in Virginia

8

Check out the following press release and video of “Senator Ghazala Hashmi (D-Chesterfield County) and Delegate Marcia “Cia” Price (D-Newport News) this morning [hoiding] a press conference celebrating that their companion bills to codify a right to contraception have successfully passed both chambers of the Virginia General Assembly by Crossover.” Great stuff; now we’ll see what Youngkin does with this important legislation.

VIDEO: Senator Hashmi, Delegate Price Celebrate Legislative Milestone in the Fight to Protect Contraception in Virginia

Watch the press conference HERE

RICHMOND, Va. – Senator Ghazala Hashmi (D-Chesterfield County) and Delegate Marcia “Cia” Price (D-Newport News) this morning held a press conference celebrating that their companion bills to codify a right to contraception have successfully passed both chambers of the Virginia General Assembly by Crossover.

HB 609 and SB 237 are a response to the concurrence written by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Dobbs decision. Thomas stated that the U.S. Supreme Court “should reconsider” other past rulings in which there was a finding of a Constitutional right to privacy, including the landmark Griswold v. Connecticut case that protected the right to contraception for married couples. The case was followed by Eisenstadt v. Baird, which expanded the right to unmarried people. Virginia’s Right to Contraception Act would ensure that the right to contraception would stand in Virginia in the event the U.S. Supreme Court overturned those rulings as well.

“The conservative majority on the Supreme Court has made it clear to us that the stripping of reproductive freedom and health care will not stop with the fall of Roe v Wade,” said Senator Hashmi. “Despite the overwhelming public support for contraception rights, we are actually witnessing political opposition at an alarming rate. Right-wing extremists are actively opposed to access, to affordability, and to the availability of contraception. Now more than ever, we have to take action.”

Just yesterday in Oklahoma, the House Public Health Committee passed the “Oklahoma Right to Human Life Act”. The bill would restrict IUDs and require physician approval for some contraceptives that are currently over-the-counter.

“Right here, right now, I am proud to declare that Virginia is and will continue to be a safe haven for reproductive rights and freedom in the South. And that includes the right to access contraception,” said Delegate Price. “This is a deeply personal issue for me … I fight not only for this right because I strongly believe in the right to contraception for family planning, but also for the right to contraception to manage a variety of medical conditions like endometriosis and in my case, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Without the use of contraceptives to manage my long list of PCOS symptoms, I would not be able to stand before you today.”

“The Dobbs decision created a landscape where every state is for themselves. And this puts thousands of people at risk,” said Rae Pickett, Communications Director for the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood. “As with many health disparities, lack of access to contraception most negatively affects folks with low incomes, Black and Brown folks, and those in rural communities. Your access to contraception shouldn’t depend on your zip code. That’s why we need SB237 and HB609 to make sure that everyone has the right to access the contraception that they need.”

“We cannot and will not let Virginia do what so many deep red states are attempting to do. That is why Birth in Color is proud to be in this fight,” said Kenda Sutton-EL, Founding Executive Director of Birth in Color. “We at Birth in Color know all too well that the worst impacts of restrictions on reproductive health care of course fall on people of color, Black women, and the LGBTQIA community – the already marginalized communities. The Right to Contraception Act is an important step towards securing reproductive rights.”

The bills will now be considered by their opposite chambers.

A video of the press conference is available HERE. High-resolution photos from the event are available HERE and may be published with attribution to Bert Shepherd.

After VA GOP Viciously Attacks First Black Speaker, Don Scott, VA Senate President Pro Tem Louise Lucas Vows to “hold [Glenn Youngkin] accountable for trash like this”

13

Yesterday afternoon, Speaker Don Scott (D) – the first African-American Speaker in Virginia history, by the way – announced that he was making a series of changes in House committees, including removing Del. Barry Knight (R) from the Appropriations Committee, apparently in response for Virginia House GOP Leader Todd Gilbert challenging Speaker Scott’s ruling re: the “germaneness” (or lack thereof) of a House GOP “substitute” for one of their members’ (far-right freshman Del. Tim Griffin)’s extreme anti-abortion bill.

If you haven’t been following this, it might seem somewhat convoluted, but it’s really about: a) Republican extremism on abortion; b) Republicans trying to cover up that extremism; c) Democrats – including Speaker Don Scott – not letting Republicans cover up their anti-abortion extremism; d) Republicans getting really mad that Democrats wouldn’t let them cover up their anti-abortion extremism; e) VA House GOP Leader Gilbert challenging Speaker Scott in an unprecedented way; f) Speaker Scott apparently retaliating for that; g) the VA House GOP viciously attacking Speaker Scott; h) the VA House GOP getting called out on that; i) Republicans scrambling to do “damage control,” realizing that yes, indeed, Don Scott is Speaker – while Democrats also control the State Senate – and if they want ANY cooperation with Democrats for the rest of Glenn Youngkin’s term as governor, they’d better not burn their bridges.

Anyway, with that, see below for a quick review of the past couple days in Virginia politics, also known as “all hell breaking loose.” Oh, and obviously don’t take anything Youngkin says seriously, given his own vicious attacks against Democrats this past weekend (insanely claiming that *Democrats* are the ones – not his own party, led by Putin’s BFF Donald Trump! – who don’t want a strong America – WTF???), and given the fact that pretty much every word out of Youngkin’s mouth since he started running for governor has been dishonest, false, in bad faith, etc.

Exactly right by Speaker Don Scott: “people at @VA_GOP act friendly but “don’t have the balls to come to my face and stay stuff like that. If I am what they say I am, how the hell do they keep losing to me?”

Interesting – pointed? – comments by John Grisham, given what just went down in the VA House of Delegates (with Speaker Don Scott removing Del. Barry Knight (R) from the Appropriations Committee

Repulsive, as usual, by the VA GOP(Q)

Video from Monday, when VA House GOP Leader Todd Gilbert shockingly challenged Speaker Don Scott’s “germaneness” ruling re: the House GOP’s “substitute” on their extreme anti-abortion bill. Gilbert lost, but this was really unprecedented.

Virginia House Democratic Caucus Statement on Shootings in Cities Across the Country on Anniversary of Parkland Shooting

2

See below for a press release from the VA House Democratic Caucus, as well as video of a speech by Del. Adele McClure (D-Arlington), on the unacceptability of continued gun violence in America – including yesterday afternoon in Kansas City – and how “we do not have to live this way.”

Virginia House Democratic Caucus Statement on Shootings in Cities Across the Country on Anniversary of Parkland Shooting

RICHMOND, VA –  The Virginia House Democratic Caucus issued the following statement in light of the recent tragic shootings in Houston, Atlanta, Washington, D.C.,  and Kansas City on the sixth anniversary of the shooting in Parkland, FL:

“We are thinking about the victims of the shooting at the Kansas City Chiefs Parade yesterday afternoon, including the number of children who suffered gunshot wounds. Our hearts are broken for the family that will be sitting down to dinner with an empty chair in the place of a loved one and for the trauma that those children will experience as a result. So too do our hearts ache for the four victims of gun violence at a highschool in Atlanta, the three officers who were shot doing their jobs in Washington, D.C., and the people who were injured at a church in Houston on Sunday.

February 14th marks a solemn and painful day of remembrance for families across the country — and this week families from four more cities were added to that list. There have been 49 mass shootings this year alone. Virginians know all too well the feelings that follow a mass shooting, and we refuse to be silent or complacent on this issue. Though, thankfully, lives were not lost in each of the shootings this week, this type of senseless violence makes victims of entire towns, and we do not have to live this way.

We must implement and strengthen common sense gun safety measures because our children deserve a future where they do not live in fear walking on a college campus or in a movie theater or a mall or church or a grocery store or a parade celebrating their favorite team.”

Rep. Jennifer Wexton (D-VA10) Announces $35 Million in Infrastructure Law Funding for Continued Support of New Dulles Airport Terminal 

3

From Rep. Jennifer Wexton (D-VA10)’s office:

Wexton Announces $35 Million in Infrastructure Law Funding for Continued Support of New Dulles Airport Terminal 

Washington, DC – Today, Congresswoman Jennifer Wexton (D-VA) announced that Washington Dulles International Airport will be receiving $35 million in federal funding thanks to the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to aid in the construction of a new 14-gate regional and commuter terminal. This is the third consecutive fiscal year that the new terminal project has received funding through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s Airport Terminals Program, after receiving $49.6 million in 2022 and $20 million in 2023.

“I’m proud that our Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is improving the passenger experience here at Dulles Airport by making the new highly-anticipated regional and commuter terminal possible,” said Rep. Wexton. “The renovations supported by this funding will make it easier and more convenient for local travelers that rely on Dulles as well as spur new economic growth in our region. I’m proud to have supported the once-in-a-generation bipartisan legislation that continues to transform and upgrade our community’s infrastructure.”

The new terminal will be conveniently located atop the underground Concourse C/D Aerotrain station, providing quick and easy access to passengers and reducing transit times for passengers with connections at Dulles who must currently use shuttle buses or long walkways. The new terminal will allow for jet bridge boarding that reduces boarding times and is more accessible for passengers with disabilities, rather than forcing passengers to board using outdoor covered walkways and aircraft stairs. It will be nearly four times larger than the current facility, which will reduce crowding, allow for expanded concessions and passenger amenities, and create additional space for operational areas, offices, aircraft servicing, and baggage handling.

The new regional and commuter terminal project will also improve Dulles’s environmental footprint, as the proposed new facility will be built to LEED Silver Certifiable standards. Environmental improvements include support for electric aircraft servicing vehicles and the use of modern energy efficient construction methods and materials.

The Airport Terminals Program provides $1 billion in grants annually for five years to address aging infrastructure at our nation’s airports.

Video: Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA07) Says Trump’s Appalling NATO Comments Show How “completely unprepared, ill equipped and absolutely not deserving of the role this man is”

3

Last night, Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA07) was on MSNBC’s “The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell.” See below for video and highlights, including:

O’Donnell: “What is at stake uh for America in this choice in this choice on NATO policy between Joe Biden and Donald Trump?”
Spanberger: “Everything is at stake…the absolute role of the United States in the world, our national security, the alliances that we built coming out of World War II, the alliances – economic. military, political – that we have made that have been part and parcel of our success as a country. And the alliances that we have depended on are all at stake. You know, we we talk frequently about the challenge in Ukraine, noting that if Putin is able to defeat Ukraine and continue on to Poland, at that point it’s an Article 5 situation – at that point, we must go on the ground on the ground to defend an ally. And I would just note there’s only been one time that Article 5 has been invoked, and that was September 12, 2001, in defense of the United States of America when we were attacked – our NATO allies joined with us, they went to war for 20 years with us. And so the fact that a former  president and now a candidate for the presidency would defile, degrade and threaten an alliance that has been vital to our security, but also to the security of the world order, is absolutely astonishing and speaks to how completely unprepared, ill equipped and absolutely not deserving of the role this man is…The reality is it is in our national security interest to continue supporting Ukraine…Tyrants and terrorists alike are watching whether the United States will continue to uphold not only our obligations but our sense of our values of American democracy and democracy the world over, whether we will support our allies in their fight for freedom or whether we will retreat on the world stage….Frankly, it is OUR security that is on the line.”

Any further questions? And yes, Mike Johnson and the other far-right extremists in the US House who are holding up aid to Ukraine are serving Putin’s interests, harming democracy and U.S. national security interests. Utterly repulsive.

Thursday News: “Two Trump cases reach critical tests today”; “Biden Says The Kansas City Shooting ‘Cuts Deep In The American Soul’”; “Democrats see 2024 border blueprint in Suozzi’s New York win”; Dominion Wants to Pass on Small Modular Reactors’ “exorbitant cost”

27

by Lowell

Here are a few international, national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Thursday, January 15.

The Importance of Expert Witnesses in Connecticut Personal Injury Claims

2

SPONSORED CONTENT

The Importance of Expert Witnesses in Connecticut Personal Injury Claims

The quality of the evidence you use in your case is a critical aspect of a case’s strength, so you want to make sure you document and preserve all pieces of evidence from the get-go.

The different types of evidence that could be helpful in a personal injury case include pictures and video footage of the scene, medical records, pictures of the injuries, medical bills, receipts, witness accounts, etc.

However, it is also important to note that evidence in and of itself may not be sufficient to build a compelling case, and that is where an expert witness comes into play. This guide looks into the role of expert witnesses in a personal injury claim, so keep reading for insight.

Who Is an Expert Witness

An expert witness is an individual with extensive and specialized knowledge of a subject matter, which gives them the authority to offer opinions on the subject in a court of law.

The court’s expectation of expert witnesses is that they will offer unbiased opinions on a matter, thereby helping it understand the facts of a case, which ultimately guides its decision-making.

In a personal injury setting, you are most likely to have medical experts, mental health experts, and accident reconstructionists called to prove a matter, but you may also have specialists in other fields, such as quality assurance, experts in safety standards in workplaces, etc.

The Importance of an  Expert Witness

Providing Clarity

Clarity or the lack thereof in a case has a significant influence on how the court decides the matter. Expert witnesses play the critical role of providing clarity in court for matters that would otherwise be too complex for the court to understand.

For example, an accident reconstructionist can use photographic evidence, witness accounts, skid marks, and car damage to recreate an accident in a way that the jury understands, helping in establishing liability.

Credibility

Expert witnesses are experts in a particular field. As such, most parties in a personal injury case view what they say as credible, something you may not get with any other witness.

“What an expert witness says is important, and it has to be factual. In addition, their presence itself helps create a positive impression in the jury and the courts and can subconsciously influence decision-making,” says attorney Mike A. D’Amico of D’Amico & Pettinicchi, LLC.

Quantifying Damages

One of the main roles of a lawyer is damage valuation, as it helps them know what to demand as compensation from the at-fault party. Even with the damage valuation skills a lawyer has, there are times when they may need the help of an expert witness in damage valuation.

For example, consider a case where future medical expenses are a factor in a case. In such situations, an expert witness can help provide the court with a clear outline of projected future medical interventions and why they are necessary, which can help guide damage valuation.

How a Lawyer Helps

A lawyer and an expert witness play different roles, so you will need to have both in your case. The expert witness only helps shed light on a matter, but it is the lawyer who does the legal work, so there is no way an expert witness can replace your need for a personal injury lawyer.

Also, it is the lawyer who helps connect you with the expert witnesses from the connections they create in their years of practice. Without a lawyer’s connection, it’s almost impossible to get one, so the starting place is hiring a lawyer.

 

 

Video: Virginia Legislative Black Caucus Releases Crossover Update on Criminal Justice Reform Agenda

3

From the VA Legislative Black Caucus:

Virginia Legislative Black Caucus Releases Crossover Update on Criminal Justice Reform Agenda

The Virginia Legislative Black Caucus (VLBC) remains in profound solidarity with the 122,500 Virginians who are actively trapped in our state’s criminal justice system, nearly half of whom are Black. When slavery was abolished by the 13th Amendment, it was qualified with “except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.” With that, mass incarceration was born and the criminal justice system absorbed the role of dehumanizing, abusing and punishing Black America.

Defeated Legislation:

The members of this organization are well positioned in both the House and Senate Courts of Justice Committees to block harsher penalties and punitive policies which would increase incarceration rates and sentencing lengths. The harmful, regressive policies we are pleased will not make it into state law include the reestablishment of the death penalty; increased larceny penalties including an automatic felony triggered by the third offense; expansions on the length of probation periods and the removal of limitations on the amount of jail time one can receive for probation violations; the elevation of certain drug offenses to the degree of felony homicide; and the restoration of an automatic denial of bail for certain offenses, denying those arrested the promised presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.

While attempting to roll back the rights of anyone who has or will interact with the criminal justice system, our Republican counterparts are simultaneously working to strengthen the power of the Commonwealth over that of community members. Together, we defeated a list of unnecessary additional reasons for police traffic stops, which we know has historically led to the disproportionate profiling of Black drivers. Additionally, we have protected and affirmed the privacy of criminal history and juvenile justice records because no one deserves to be indefinitely punished for their worst mistake.

Repealing processes which are detrimental to Black communities in Virginia is only half of our task. As quickly as we work to dismantle the unjust criminal system, the VLBC is rebuilding it to be more efficient, empathetic and effective.

Increasing guidance and accountability for law enforcement interventions:

With a joint effort in the House and Senate to restrict the use of the widely condemned and barbaric policy of solitary confinement, SB 719, sponsored by Senator Bagby, and HB 1244, sponsored by Delegate Cole both passed in their respective chambers.

SB 546, sponsored by Senator Bagby, was unanimously passed in the Senate. The bill allows one’s family member or legal guardian to be present during the process to determine whether they meet the criteria for a psychiatric temporary detention order. This act of dignity could have also been life-saving in cases such as that of 28 year old Irvo Otieno, who was killed in custody after being restrained in a Virginia Psychiatric Hospital in 2023.

SB 547, sponsored by Senator Bagby, was unanimously passed in the Senate. This requires law enforcement training for people with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

HB 611, sponsored by Delegate Price, passed with bipartisan support in the House. As we fight to prevent its use, we are championing this bill to increase the reporting on and transparency around deaths in custody. When any person dies under the supposed care of the Commonwealth, we are entitled to a complete investigation, analysis and active measures to prevent another death from occurring in the same way.

HB 1496, sponsored by Delegate Rasoul, passed with bipartisan support in the House. This targets and regulates law-enforcement agencies’ use of surveillance, directing the Department of Criminal Justice Services to create and maintain a registry of surveillance technologies.

Expanding opportunities and pathways out of the criminal justice system:

HB 1269, sponsored by Delegate Price, passed with bipartisan support in the House and was referred to the Senate Committee on Rehabilitation and Social Services. It creates an exemption to certain “barrier crime” rules which block many in the recovery community from employment at an adult substance abuse or mental health treatment program.

SB 482, sponsored by Senator Aird, and HB 803, sponsored by Delegate Rasoul support additional record expungement of juvenile court records, for certain offenses which would be considered a felony, if committed by an adult. While the Senate version of the bill failed to pass out of the Senate Courts of Justice Committee, its House counterpart passed and is on its way to the Senate.

HB 457, sponsored by Delegate Callsen, passed in the House. The bill establishes criteria for the mandatory reduction of probation periods including the defendant’s participation in educational activities, maintaining employment, completing a mental health or substance abuse treatment program, and good conduct.

HB 1252, sponsored by Delegate McClure, passed in the House with some bipartisan support. Aligning with our priority of cutting back the recidivism rate and amount of people behind bars who pose no threat to public safety—the bill introduces parole revocation hearing guidelines, reviews of previous technical violations and limits on sentences after one’s parole has been revoked.

In order to break down the wall between our dual justice systems—one which works for the rich and one which does not work, we are focused on eliminating the financial burden of the carceral system:

HB 824, sponsored by Delegate Cousins, passed in the House. The bill holds indigent Virginian’s harmless for potential increases in court-appointed attorney fees. This will mitigate the burden of legal counsel fees for those among us who are the most financially vulnerable while promoting financial incentives for more attorneys to take court appointments, with better quality representation.

SB 514, sponsored by Senator Williams Graves, passed in the Senate. The bill reduces the fee collection period from a maximum of 60 years and minimum of 30, down to 10 years. This ensures that not every sentence is a life sentence.

SB 481, sponsored by Senator Aird, was passed in the Senate Courts of Justice Committee but failed to pass the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee. The bill would have abolished juvenile fines and fees related to the prosecution of criminal offenses.

HB 246, sponsored by Delegate Jones, passed in the House and has been referred to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee. The bill makes the fines, penalties and other costs associated with criminal and traffic cases more transparent including updates on what the remaining balance is.

HB 614, sponsored by Delegate Price, passed in the House with some bipartisan support This proposed program to create community service work opportunities, which could be participated in during incarceration, in lieu of payment of fines and costs, is a step towards making criminal consequences more meaningful and restorative for both the incarcerated person and the Commonwealth.

Senator Williams Graves and Delegate Price, have introduced legislation in both chambers to create payment plans and deferred payment agreements for incarcerated people with fees related to their criminal case. SB 654 was passed in the Senate and HB 612 was passed in the House and has been referred to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee.

In the United States, we are leading in imprisonment with a higher rate of incarceration than all other democratic nations. In Virginia, our incarceration rate is even higher than the national average. This is a government failure. Our prisons have created a cycle of abuse, which we must end by reducing unnecessary incarceration:

SB 643, sponsored by Senator Aird, passed out of the Senate Courts of Justice Committee but failed to pass through the Senate. This legislation would create an exemption for willfully failing to appear in judicial proceedings while one is in the custody of law enforcement. Currently, the person in custody would be facing a Class 1 misdemeanor or Class 6 felony even though the ability to appear on time is widely out of their control. For deterrence laws to be effective, they must target those with the power to change the desired outcome.

HB 455, sponsored by Delegate Callsen, passed in the House. This will cut down on unnecessary prison time, due to legal technicalities, by reducing the offense for possession of an item containing less than one gram of a controlled substance from a Class 5 felony to a Class 1 misdemeanor.

HB 179, sponsored by Delegate Gardner, was passed in the House Appropriations Committee but failed to pass through the House. Through eliminating mandatory consecutive sentences of imprisonment, this bill would mitigate needlessly long sentences and allow the court’s approach to any individual to be more holistic.

HB 452, sponsored by Delegate Callsen, passed unanimously in the House. The benefits of the first offender drug program have already been demonstrated in Virginia and we plan to expand them to anyone convicted of an offense related to misdemeanor possession of marijuana. This allows individuals to avoid a conviction or criminal record by satisfying certain probationary terms.

HB 834, sponsored by Delegate Cousins, failed to pass in the House Appropriations Committee. Even if they meet all other criteria, someone who has been transferred out of jail and into state prison cannot petition for the modification of their sentence. By creating a pathway for this, we will simply be elevating them to the same level of due process given to all other citizens.

SB 144, sponsored by Senator Carroll Foy, passed in the Senate. This bill would ensure that those charged with a felony have a right to preliminary hearing—which we are all entitled to under the law. However, prosecutors have exploited a loophole which has rendered this right meaningless on a technicality by dropping charges in District Courts and recharging individuals in Circuit Courts.