Home Blog Page 2001

Virginia Dems to Vote 6/27 on Changing Current Term for Chairs from 2 to 3 Years

8

I was chatting with Virginia Democratic Party insider earlier this week, and out of the blue the person asked me, “Are you hearing about the pending DPVA fight over local committees?” I hadn’t heard a word about it, actually, so I started asking around (as we bloggers are wont to do – lol). Here’s what I’ve found out so far.

*There’s a proposal to give local Virginia Democratic Party chairs a third year and not reorganize until after the presidential election in November 2016, instead of the end of this year, which is what the current plan calls for.

*I haven’t nailed down where this is coming from exactly, but it sounds like it’s probably from the local chairs (one source specifically mentioned “Chair of Chairs” Gene Magruder) In other words, it does NOT appear to be coming from the Clinton campaign, Gov. McAuliffe, DPVA Chair Susan Swecker (who I hear opposes this) or new DPVA Executive Directly Rebecca Slutzky (ditto).

*What is this all about? I’m not sure exactly, but one source told me, “I hear it’s about chairs, particularly in Northern Virginia, wanting to keep their positions for another year, expecting ‘bennies’ from the Hillary Clinton run.” I also heard an argument made that it’s better to have “experienced leaders in place for the presidential race.”

*Apparently, for this rule change to pass, it would need to get an “absolute majority” of the Central Committee [update: someone else tells me that it might only require a simple majority of those present).

*I’ve heard from several party folks who oppose this idea. One told me they just don’t think it makes any sense, that “the harder years for most local chairs are the odd years,” not the federal election/even-numbered years.

*One person responded, tartly: “Canceling elections? These chairs were not elected for next year… changing the rules midstream and making it effect old elections is highly questionable.”

*Another counterargument I heard was that this change “could create problems for larger committees [Lowell’s note: actually all committees have would to amend their bylaws to allow for this change],” such as in Northern Virignia, Richmond and Hampton Roads, since they “would need to change bylaws and their schedules.”

*I hear from multiple sources that there are folks in the Fairfax County Democratic Committee who are opposed to this because they don’t want current chair Sue Langley to get a third year.

*Another local party official told me, “Any DPVA member who cares about their local committee’s finances should vote it down.”

*Finally, I received the following statement from a Democratic local committee person who wanted to remain anonymous, but was concerned about the potential loss of income to their committee.

I’m a local Democratic Committee member, but not a voting DPVA member, and I’m not happy about this proposal.  For one thing, our members hardly know that the proposal exists and they haven’t been given much of an opportunity to weigh in on something that will greatly affect our local organization.  We elected our Chairs to serve a two-year term in early 2014.  The terms of office will be extended not only for our Chair, but for the rest of the leadership and full membership as well. Some will welcome this change, and there are others who never intended to serve that long and will resign.

Additionally, a large portion of our revenue comes from membership dues. We actually budgeted for the thousands of dollars we expected to take in at the end of this year in the form of two-year memberships. Without that income, we’d have to cut back on our voter outreach programs. You can “assess” members for a year’s worth of their membership dues but that would have to be optional, and we might only get half of the membership participating (not to mention a lot of confusion).  So we would recover roughly a quarter of the budgeted income in membership dues, and wait another year for the remainder.

Given all those arguments, my view is that the terms shouldn’t be changed unless there’s some overriding reason to do so, and I can’t think of any (and haven’t heard of any). Also, I see no reason for a divisive issue to come up when we have such important elections this year (for control of the State Senate) and next (for President and Congress). If I were a Central Committee member, personally I’d vote “no.”

By the way, DPVA will be meeting at 10 am at Woodson High School in Fairfax City the day after the Hillary Clinton event to vote on this. Supposedly it’s open to the public; should be interesting.  

Family Feud Grows in Roanoke

14

The latest kerfluffle making news in the 21st state senate district, now represented by Democrat John Edwards, is the recent cancellation of a fundraiser for Attorney General Mark Herring’s One Commonwealth PAC. The fundraiser was to take place at the law offices of Ray Ferris, a Roanoke city councilman who ran the last time as an independent after serving on council as a Democrat.  There are conflicting stories about just how the fundraiser, at which John Edwards was scheduled to appear, got pulled.

According to Tommy Jordan, a long-time Democratic campaign activist who has helped Ferris in previous elections, the Edwards campaign wanted the event canceled because they said Ferris was going to use it to announce his support for Don Caldwell, 35-year veteran commonwealth’s attorney for Roanoke City, who bolted the party he used to chair to run as an independent against Edwards and his Republican opponent, Dr. Nancy Dye. Jordan adamantly denied that was going to happen.  Meanwhile, Sam Barrett, campaign manager for Edwards, said that Edwards wasn’t involved in the decision to pull the plug on the fundraiser.

The statement from Adam Zuckerman, the director of Herring’s PAC said, “This particular event was becoming a bit of distraction for local Democrats, but Attorney General Herring strongly supports Senator Edwards’s re-election.”

This newest pothole in the road to Edwards retaining his seat makes me wonder if he can pull off re-election or not.  Jordan’s disavowal notwithstanding, I believe that Ferris WAS going to sabotage Edwards with a Caldwell endorsement. Why? First, after he graduated from law school in the late 1980’s, Ferris’ first job was in Don Caldwell’s office as an assistant prosecutor, staying there until he opened his own firm. They have remained fast friends. Plus, Ferris evidently has not gotten over the fact that in the last council election in May 2014 two other Democrats filed to run against the three Democratic incumbents up for re-election for the three available nominations. Thus, there would have been a primary. To avoid that, Ferris broke with the party and ran as an independent. He was joined by fellow incumbent Bill Bestpitch, who also had been elected as a Democrat.

Since getting a Democratic nod is usually tantamount to being elected in Roanoke City, Ferris, I think, still has a pretty big grudge against the city Democratic Party committee. I’m also sure that the fact both he and Bestpitch won their seats as independents reinforced that grudge. That incident also showed splits within the city Democratic committee as Mayor David Bowers and David Trinkle, the one incumbent who ran as a Democrat, backed Ferris and Bestpitch, instead of the other Democratic candidates, Freeda Cathcart and Linda Wyatt. That whole election was a clash of egos that evidently is still poisoning city politics.

In 2011 Edwards won re-election against Republican Del. Dave Nutter by capturing 56% of the district vote.  Roanoke City comprises about 45% of the votes in the 21st. This time around, Edwards may well not get anywhere near the 63% of the city vote he did in 2011 because of Don Caldwell’s independent bid. Last time out, Edwards carried the city and Montgomery County, but lost in Giles County and the small portion of Republican Roanoke County that’s in the district. He has little or no room to make up big losses of votes in the city. Besides, his Republican opponent will have a huge war chest to spend this time around, while Caldwell will probably act as a spoiler at best.

Edwards had been lagging in fundraising, but he did better in May, finally outraising his Republican opponent. The keys to his winning against these two opponents are going to boil down to aggressive campaigning and identifying his voters and getting them to the polls. John Edwards hasn’t had to fight this hard before, and the implications of this election are huge. Control of the state senate may hinge on the outcome in the 21st district. Is Edwards up to the task before him? I really don’t know. If I had to rate it, I would say a sure Democratic seat is now a “slightly leans Democratic” one.

Video: Attorney General Loretta Lynch speaks on Charleston, S.C. shooting

5

Bottom line: as long as there are racists and violent people out there with access to guns, this type of thing will keep happening. So what are we going to do about it? I mean, when a mass murder using guns happened in Australia, they took highly effective action; since then, mass shootings stopped, gun homicides and suicides plummeted. So what about our country? How many more times do we have to watch, helplessly, as kids are gunned down at school, worshippers are gunned down at church, people are gunned down in movie theaters, women are gunned down by their violent male stalkers, etc., etc? One time is too many. Oh, and for anyone who delusionally claims there’s no racism in this country, here’s more evidence that they are absolutely wrong.

For Our Grandchildren: Applying the Golden Rule to Climate Change

1

Here is my statement at my third press conference in my campaign to replace Mark Obenshain in the Virginia State Senate. (Obenshain is the Koch-Brothers-funded, ALEC-serving politician who appears to aspire to become Virginia’s Scott Walker.)

In this press conference, I focused on the issue that is closest to my heart: climate change, and the obligation we have to protect the earth and the generations to come by acting responsibly now to meet that challenge.

As you’ll see, I present this issue in terms of the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. I do so not only because that captures so aptly the profound moral dimension of our situation, and the profound moral abdication of politicians like Obenshain, but also because it seems a suitable rhetorical strategy in my (Virginia’s 26th senatorial) District.

This district is 70-30 Republican, and many of that 70 percent strongly self-identify as Christian. No one who wants to follow the teachings of Jesus, and how understands the situation we now face, could countenance for a moment supporting the climate-change politics of Mark Obenshain and his Koch Brothers backers.

To dramatize those we are “doing unto” either by our actions or our inactions, I brought in a poster — in its public debut — containing the faces of my own two little granddaughters, both born just last year. These two, who have brought my own passion on the issue to a higher heat, stand in for all those innocents to come who depend upon us to protect them. (See below)

Here are the text and the video of my statement, delivered yesterday in Harrisonburg to the press and a roomful of enthusiastic citizens.

***************************

When someone speaks of “Posterity,” or of “Those who come after us,” the pictures these notions conjure up in our minds are generally quite vague. They scarcely touch our hearts.

Until now, for us Americans that has been all right. Sure, over the generations, we’ve made some long-term investments in our country – the railroads, the interstate highway system. But for the most part we Americans been able to work to make good lives for ourselves–  and in the process we have created a nation in which our children and grandchildren could lead even better lives.

Until now, we’ve never had to think very deeply or caringly about our grandchildren while we’ve gone about our business.

But now is different.

Now we have some important – no, we have some absolutely vital – decisions to make that are more about them than about us. Now, we if don’t take their vital interests to heart, we will be guilty of the most serious kind of moral defect: indifference to the suffering of innocents.

That’s why I’m here today to make vivid and palpable what’s at stake here, to help the citizens of this district feel in their hearts what their choice means when they go to the polls this November to choose between Mark Obenshain and me.

So let me introduce you to my two little granddaughters. These are the little ones I mentioned when I announced my candidacy here in March-the innocents I feel most deeply moved to protect.

[SHOW THE POSTER]

Of course, it’s not just about my grandchildren. Let them stand in here as representative of all the children and grandchildren across Virginia, across America, indeed across the whole world, who are depending upon us now to act responsibly to protect them.

Look at those sweet little faces. Look at their precious openness to what life has to offer.

Don’t you just feel, as I do, you’d hate for such innocents to suffer? Doesn’t the idea of letting them down just tear you up?

Well, that’s what’s at stake when it comes to climate change.

Here’s how the scientists are describing the world these little ones might have to live in if we don’t act now to protect them:

1) The Pentagon itself has declared climate change to be a “threat multiplier.” The less responsible we are now, the more the world our children and grandchildren live in will be plagued by insecurity and war.

2) Our failing to act makes it more likely that food and fresh water will be scarce in the world our children and grandchildren live in.

3) The less we attend to this gathering crisis, the more the sea levels will rise, swamping coastal cities here in Virginia and around the world.

4) Unpredictable, extreme weather.

And the list could go on.

In moral terms, our choice is really quite simple. The question is, will we follow the Golden Rule, or will we not?

For by our actions, or our inactions, we are doing unto them as surely as if we were putting our arms around them now to protect them, or pushing them into onrushing danger. And so the Golden Rule would have us ask: if we were in their position, and depending on people in our position to act with our vital needs in mind, how would we want them to do unto us?

Would we want them to do unto us the way Mark Obenshain has consistently done, serving the short-term profits of his corporate sponsors at the expense of the most vital needs of our children and grandchildren?

Or would we want them to do unto us the way I am calling for us to do?

As far as I can tell from Senator Obenshain’s record, is one of serving the short-term profits of the big fossil fuel interests – such as Dominion Power and the coal companies – even at the expense of the well-being of these little girls, and the millions of others who depend upon us to act responsibly now to protect their lives in the future.

Another clue about the nature of the interests Mr. Obenshain serves: the fact that the Koch Brothers gave Mr. Obenshain $60,000 for his campaign in 2013. The Koch Brothers have been at the forefront of the effort to spread misinformation about this challenge, have done everything they could to block responsible action so we’ll stay addicted to what these billionaires are selling.

Would the Golden Rule have us support Senator Obenshain, whom the Koch Brothers have chosen to advance their agenda? Would the Golden Rule have us re-elect this state Senator who has opposed giving the fossil fuel companies incentives to cut back on their spewing out the gases that are destabilizing our climate?

To the citizens of this district, I say: if you follow the Golden Rule with respect to all these innocents who are now depending on us to protect them, it is clear that I’m your candidate.

Oh, and I’m not calling for us to make huge sacrifices. It would be a good start first, to just stop lying about what the science tells us, and second, to seize the opportunity that this necessary transition in our energy system is presenting us. Contrary to what Dominion Power, and its buddy Senator Obenshain, seem to think, our best future lies not in resisting change but in leading it.

Since when does America leave it to other countries to create the solutions of the future? Since when does America turn its back on challenges, rather than harness our powerful American ingenuity to meet them?

Think of what this nation did when we faced the challenge of World War II. We mobilized to meet that challenge. We consistently did the impossible in harnessing the might of our economy to win that war. And in just a handful of years, we solved enormous scientific and technological challenges in the Manhattan Project to make the atomic bomb. And we prospered!

Where is that national will to meet today’s big challenge?  Where’s America’s Manhattan Project for solving the problems of climate change?

Our way forward is being blocked by Big Money interests who don’t want this nation to adjust to new realities.  And it is being blocked by politicians, like Mark Obenshain, who are willing to help those interests sacrifice our future, and our grandchildren, for short-term profits.

Isn’t it time we get rid of such politicians and elect leaders who care about more than their own short-term gain? Isn’t it time we elect leaders who act from love of those little ones who depend on us?

Isn’t it time to replace Mark Obenshain with me as the Senator from Virginia’s 26th District?

National and Virginia News Headlines: Thursday Morning

3

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Thursday, June 18.

*The pope, the saint and the climate

*Updates on Pope Francis’ Encyclical on Climate Change

*Fox host freaks out over ‘Marxist’ Pope Francis: He is ‘the most dangerous person on the planet’ (More evidence Fox is utterly deranged.)

*9 dead in S.C. church shooting: Police search for gunman in Charleston ‘hate crime’ (“The shooting took place Wednesday night during a prayer service at the historic African American church. The pastor was missing after the shooting and feared to be among the dead.”)

*Here are 10 of the worst domestic terror attacks by extreme Christians and right-wing white men

*Thugs and Terrorists Have Plagued Black Churches for Generations (“The Charleston, South Carolina, shooting spree is the latest attack on these symbols of African-American endurance and triumph-over-adversity. And their members need our solidarity today.”)

*Bursting Jeb’s bubble: The ugly truth behind Bush’s economic record

*Donald Trump Campaign Offered Actors $50 to Cheer for Him at Presidential Announcement

*Fox News as we know it may be screwed: Roger Ailes’ stunning rebuke could spell the end (“With Rupert Murdoch stepping aside, Roger Ailes will now report to Murdoch’s Fox-hating sons”)

*One Big Fact Media Are Missing On Jeb Bush, The Pope, And Climate Change (“Coverage Of Bush’s Criticism Of Pope’s Encyclical Should Include Candidate’s Secret Coal Industry Meeting”)

*Fox’s Sean Hannity Lets Jeb Bush Whitewash The Consequences Of Florida’s Permissive Gun Laws (“Bush Signed Nation’s First NRA-Backed ‘Stand Your Ground’ Law”)

*GOP ‘Fix’ To A Supreme Court Decision Gutting Obamacare Would Actually Make Things Much Worse

*CTB approves VDOT budget, funding formulas (“Members upped by 5 percentage points the ‘accessibility’ category, used to measure how easily people can get to jobs and could boost transit projects. The board did the same for ‘land use,’ which indicates whether a project will encourage smart growth.” Good, but not enough.)

*Why Virginia’s Tea Party Wants the GOP to Ditch its Primary in 2016 (“Tea partiers have the clout to switch from a primary to a convention, but some establishment members say it will hurt the party in the general election.”)

*Kaine, Warner call for tougher regulation of financial abuse of military members

*Webb blasts trade deal over lack of transparency

*Editorial: Data on executions shouldn’t be hidden

*Push to open government meetings shot down in Richmond (“A Daily Press push to open local government discussions about the performance of leaders was rejected Wednesday by a state panel studying Virginia’s open meetings laws.”)

*Prosecutor outlines why he dropped charges against black U-Va. student

*Another ‘wake-up call’ for Metro

*Steven Souza Jr. haunts Nationals, Jordan Zimmermann

*D.C. area forecast: Dodging showers today, drier Friday, Sunday may be stormy

Guess Who’s on Board with Carly Fiorina for President…

2

That’s right, our old friend, incompetent right wingnut Jeff Frederick! For more on Frederick and his antics (including being fired as Chair of the Virginia GOP for utter incompetence, among other issues), see here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. One thing Fiorina and Frederick have in common: both were booted out by their respective organizations (Hewlett-Packard for Fiorina; the RPV for Frederick). A match made in heaven! LOL

From: jeff@xxxx.xx

Sent: 6/16/2015 5:23:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time

Subj: Event this Saturday with Carly

Friend —

You know, in the unusual event that a good friend decides to run for President of the United States, it makes it easy to pick who you will support… even more so when your wife becomes the senior advisor to the candidate.

Well, that’s exactly what’s happened. Amy and I have been proud to call Carly and Frank Fiorina friends for some time now, and we are so thrilled that Carly is in the race for the White House. She is among the most accomplished women in our nation’s history after having led the largest technology company in the world; she is articulate and thoughtful on the issues and challenges facing our country; and she is a bold and principled leader.

If you haven’t heard Carly speak or gotten to meet her, now is your chance. And, even if you haven’t decided who to support or your first choice is another candidate, hopefully you can recognize how important it is to have Carly in this race.

This Saturday night (6/20), Carly is having a fundraiser in Stafford, Virginia, hosted by our old neighbor and longtime pal Steve Albertson. Amy (still at 60 Plus in addition to her role as one of Carly’s top advisors) and I both will be there and it’d be great to see you if you can make it…

Best wishes and hope to see you this Saturday.

-JMF.

Only in Far-Right-Wing La-La Land Could Virginia’s GOP Congresscritters Not Be Right-Wing Enough

6

Courtesy of the right-wing Virginia political blog The Bull Elephant comes the following fun news from far-right-wing la-la land:

This new PAC, Virginia Vision, is calling on Virginia conservatives to mount primary challenges against three Virginia Congressional representatives when they run for re-election in 2016.  Those three are Scott Rigell (2nd), Robert Hurt (5th), and Barbara Comstock (10th).

Nope, this is apparently not an Onion-style satire. Check out Virginia Vision’s press release, which rips Rigell, Hurt and Comstock for supporting something I always assumed “conservatives” supported — free trade. But nope, their irrational hatred for President Obama knows no bounds, and overrides the normal support among conservatives for trade (and against protectionism): “After the track record established by our President, all Republican Representatives should be standing up against any bill that would give this President more power over the legislative branch.” Of course, even if you go with that FUBAR argument, the fact is that President Obama will be out of office in 1 1/2 years, so this trade pact (which the Republican-controlled Congress will vote on) would mostly impact future presidents. But let’s not let logic get in the way of these fine folks’ internal inconsistency, paranoia, etc. It’s too much fun to watch, after all.

Even more hilariously bonkers, the Virginia Vision folks claim that “every Republican elected official campaigned as a Conservative Republican, yet, as can be seen with failing scores they are no different from the Democrats with the same Liberty grade.” That’s right, they’re claiming that far-right loons like Morgan Griffith and Barbara Comstock are one and the same as Democrats Bobby Scott, Gerry Connolly and Don Beyer. Alrighty then…

P.S. Needless to say, I’d LOVE LOVE LOVE it if the far-right wingnuts would primary Comstock, Rigell, etc., softening them up for a Democrat to defeat them, or maybe even beating them in a primary and increasing the chances for Democratic pickups in November 2016.  

National and Virginia News Headlines: Wednesday Morning

10

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Wednesday, June 17. Also see Vice President Joe Biden speaking at the White House Clean Energy Investment Summit, “bringing together major foundations and institutional investors to announce $4 billion to scale up investment in clean energy innovation.”

*Cracks appear in the climate change deniers’ defenses (Just remember, these people are aided and abetted by the corporate media, which continues with its wildly irresponsible, cowardly false equivalence and also downplaying of denialism to “skepticism,” which it most certainly is not.)

*Senate passes torture ban despite Republican opposition (Anyone who voted to allow torture is utterly unfit for public office, not to mention a sociopath.)

*NASA: Aquifers losing water at alarming rates (Yet another example of how humanity is trashing the planet. And Republicans’ answer? Keep on doing the same thing, or even accelerate the devastation!)

*Donald Trump’s festival of narcissism

*Donald Trump Elbows His Way into the Republican Clown Car (“And Sidney Blumenthal does the whole Benghazi thing.”)

*Neil Young to Donald Trump: Don’t Rock in My Free World (“The rocker also endorses Bernie Sanders.”)

*RNC Official Awkwardly Refuses To Denounce Trump’s Anti-Immigrant Screed (Yikes.)

*Jeb Bush Says Obama Has Left “Violence Unopposed.” Ask Al Qaeda. (“The day after the GOPer bashed the president’s foreign policy, a US drone strike kills Al Qaeda’s No. 2.”)

*Jeb Bush knocks Pope on climate change push (Wow, what an f-tard. Also, utterly unqualified for higher office, let alone president.)

*Rhetoric rises in Dominion pipeline fight (“As the developer of a pipeline to bring fracked natural gas to North Carolina sues landowners for refusing to cooperate, a politically influential collection of opponents is trying to raise $1 million to torpedo plans to route the project through Virginia farms and properties, saying the Atlantic Coast Pipeline would be a scar on Appalachia.”)

*Jim Webb: ‘I don’t want a Super PAC’ (The problem for Webb is that he also hates fundraising.)

*Virginia, Coal Country for Centuries, Now Embraces Carbon Regulations (Not sure I’d go that far…)

*Herring PAC pulls plug on Roanoke fundraiser (“Tommy Jordan, one of the event organizers, said he was told by the PAC director that the group was pulling out because [Sen. John] Edwards’ campaign claimed major donors were upset and wouldn’t attend an event at [Roanoke Councilman Ray] Ferris’ office.”)

*Schapiro: Low primary turnout would have thrilled Byrd (“The quirks of Virginia’s political calendar help the ins and hurt the outs”)

*Northrop Grumman lays off 51 state workers under contract with VITA

*Transportation overhaul: New scoring system for project funding nearly set (Environmental quality and land use should make up large percentages of this formula. If not, it’s a major #FAIL. Also, it really depends how they calculate “congestion relief”; if they think adding lanes helps in that regard, they are flat-out wrong.)

*Layne: U.S. 460 negotiations will keep going

*Save Sweet Briar

*Senators from Maryland and Virginia blast Metro (Not sure members of Congress blasting Metro is the answer, when the system is so badly underfunded by…yep, Congress.)

*Nationals pound out 23 hits in 16-4 rout of Tampa Bay Rays

*D.C. area forecast: Not as hot the next few days, but still feeling like summer

Corporate Media Takes Fossil Fuel Industry “Poll” on Fracking, Gas Pipeline Seriously. #FAIL

0

Yet another #FAIL by the corporate media when it comes to “reporting” (using that word VERY loosely) on energy and environmental issues here in Virginia. One of the most egregious, frankly disgraceful examples of this occurred last fall, when the Virginia media gullibly/cluelessly reported as fact the fossil fuel propaganda/garbage put out by the thoroughly “captured” State Corporation Commission on the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. The lack of any critical analysis or digging on that one was simply astounding, calling into question why we even have “reporters,” if all they’re going to do is print whatever drivel they receive in their inboxes.

Now, we see yet another example of the News Corpse at work, with their “reporting” on a new “poll” that ostensibly shows support for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, as well as for “expanded off-shore energy  production, constructing the Keystone XL pipeline, and coal power plants.” These are “interesting” results on a couple levels: 1) the poll was conducted for the “Consumer Energy Alliance” (CEA) fossil fuel front group, which has worked ” to thwart government efforts to favor relatively cleaner conventional fuels over the dirtiest forms of extreme unconventional energy like the Alberta tar sands;”  and 2) the CEA fossil fuel front troup “poll” contradicts other polling which finds overwhelming majorities in Virginia and other states who support moving off of dirty energy and towards cleaner sources like solar and wind. As Peter Galuszka writes in the comments secion of Dominion Power-sponsored blog Bacon’s Rebellion:

The “Consumer” Energy Alliance? Funny but I don’t see one “consumer” advocate on the board, rather the pr spokeswoman for steel maker Nucor, a rural electrical coop, another other manufacturing types. Nary an environmentalist there. Nor a consumer.

Of course, they’re going to have a poll showing that “Virginians” just love Dominion’s controversial pipeline project.

Jim, if this is a sample of what the new Dominion sponsorship means then maybe we should quit before we are ahead.

Also worth noting is a comment by the Sierra Club’s Glen Besa, who points out that “the poll at best is indicative of the success of a major advertising campaign by the natural gas industry promoting it as a clean fuel…s an industry poll, and it reflects the industry’s perspective.” And yes, in fairness, the corporate media DID note that the CEA is “industry-backed,” and that it “includes Dominion and Piedmont Natural Gas among its members.” Of course, that raises the question of why the media even went with this “story” at all. As a commenter at the Roanoke Times puts it: “A poll that was bought and paid for by the industry. Back in the days of journalism this was called a ‘press release’.” Bingo.

Video: The Republican 2016 Freak Show Gets Freakier; Donald Trump Throws Toupee in the Ring

4

Sadly, given how far off the right-wing, bigoted deep end the Republican Party has gone, Donald Trump fits right in. For instance, Trump rants about Mexican immigrants “bringing drugs, bringing crime, they’re rapists, and some, I assume, are good people.” Oh, and Iran is taking over Iraq “bigly.” Huh? Ee gads, this guy almost makes Ben Carson, Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee, and the rest of the GOP freak show look sane. (Note: Here in Virginia, we already saw a 2013 statewide Republican ticket that had at three people – Ken Cuccinelli, E.W. Jackson, Mark Obenshain – who are comparable to Trump on the lunacy scale. So we’re used to it here, I guess…)

P.S. Check out the DNC’s epic trolling of Trump and his crazy party.

P.P.S. The freak show gets freaker as Geraldo Rivera (gack!) weighs in: “@realDonaldTrump is more competent, creative, tough, experienced, courageous and bold than most of the announced candidates for president.”