Home Blog Page 2321

There is NO corruption in Va, only an Old Boy Network

1

“Corrupt public officials undermine our country’s national security, our overall safety, the public trust, and confidence in the U.S. government, wasting billions of dollars along the way. This corruption can tarnish virtually every aspect of society.” — Special Agent Patrick Bohrer, assistant section chief of our Public Corruption/Civil Rights program at FBI Headquarters.

Virginia is in need of launching a grand jury investigation into the cozy relationships between controversial Arlington, Va elected judges, lawyers and politicians in response to community allegations that civil judgeships – with annual salaries $150,000 or more – are for sale. At issue is an arcane system in which voters pick delegates to a judicial nominating convention, but do not pick the judges themselves. The system allows political party leaders to steer nominations to judicial candidates who have strong party ties and deep pockets – not sound legal credentials. And because Arlington is heavily Democratic, that party has a near lock on selecting judges. You have to be connected to get on the bench in Arlington. Are there payoffs? There’s always been that buzz in the court community. Democratic party leaders have denied that the selection process in Arlington is corrupt. It’s time for independent judge-selection panels, nonpartisan elections and other reforms to counter Virginia’s reputation for one of the most corrupt state, starting with judicial corruption in Arlington. Virginia Corruption Risk Report Card http://www.stateintegrity.org/…

Janice Wolk Grenadier “The Judge’s are not elected – well they are by other attorneys – so they owe those attorneys- This is an Old Boy Network – You have to start from the top Judge Donald Kent – Judge Donald Haddock – yes retired – but, still have there hands in the till – I have enough on both of them – But, having the documents – and everything it takes – Doesn’t matter – because the Corruption goes to the Federal Courts – So who is going to listen? The problem is the Press has no balls to report the Truth – and they are all covering up for each other – THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN AMERICA IS BROKEN – WE HAVE BECOME A “DO AS I SAY NOT A DO AS I DO ” COUNTRY iT IS VERY SAD”

Does she have a point about the Old Boy Network in Virginia?

1) PETITION TO THE VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE FOR THE REMOVAL OF 17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ESTHER LYLES WIGGINS :

http://www.ipetitions.com/peti…

No Arlington family courts do NOT have anything in common with recketeering schemes uncovered in several other states: IFCAA Fighting State Court-Based Racketeering Announces Advances in Illinois, Georgia, PA and Utah: http://www.mmdnewswire.com/ifc…

The county prosecutor is Marry Craig (Moran), the first wife of Jim Moran and a mother of his older children.

The avid supporter of Judge Wiggins, Federal Judge Gerald Bruce Lee – Alexandria Virginia has his share of questionable practices: http://www.scribd.com/doc/1161…

In 2003, Lee dismissed the kidnapping and murder charges against Jay E. Lentz, a former naval intelligence officer, even though a jury had found him guilty. It marked the first time a judge dismissed a jury verdict in a federal death penalty case. Earlier in the case, Lee advised a witness that if she cried he would stop her testimony, a move that is unusual in that it is rare for a judge to preview testimony in a death penalty hearing or restrict how witnesses can act or what they can say: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G…

No Judge Wiggins was NOT removed, in fact, she was REAPPOINTED regardless of numerous complains to the legislative panel, including DC lawyer Roy Morris testimony on December 17, 2009 before the joint Courts of Justice Committee in Richmond. Morris told the committee that something is rotten in Arlington J&DR – he insinuated that money is changing hands in Arlington. He told the committee how his client was told she needed to pay $20,000 to get her child back. http://thepitchforkrebellion.b…

2) Corporations, pro-business nonprofits foot bill for judicial seminars. George Mason University top host of events: http://www.publicintegrity.org…

No, there are NO issues.

3) Major Developer John Shooshan Is Now Chair of Barbara Favola’s Fundraising Committee?!?

https://bluevirginia.us/sho…

Developers Donate to Favola’s Senate Campaign:

http://www.arlnow.com/2011/04/…

“there is NOTHING illegal about what I have received” –Favola

Walter Tejada, Chairman of the Arlington Board is a former aide to Jim Moran, he was appointed by Mark R. Warner when he was a Governor.

4) Arlington County Board member Chris Zimmerman’s consulting job with a subsidiary of a global company that works with the county does not constitute to a conflict of interest or appearance of conflict, according to County Attorney Stephen MacIssac.

http://arlington-va.patch.com/…

There is NO conflict of interest.

5) Jim Moran (D-Va ensnarled in scandals, including the investigation into the lobbying firm PMA Group that was accused of trading earmarks for campaign funds. The House ethics committee has exonerated Moran. http://www.publicintegrity.org…

No, there is NO corruption, Jim Moran NEVER does ANY favors to the contributors of his campaigns.

6) Prosecutors in Arlington County, Va., say they will not pursue charges against the son of U.S. Rep. Jim Moran, Patrick Moran, in voter fraud,  http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/pro…

No, there was NO fraud, it was all a joke by Arlington ethical standards.

And NO do not expect anything to change, Brian ­Moran, a former Virginia delegate and former chairman of the state Democratic Party, a brother of Jim Moran is bidding for the position of the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia. Typically, Virginia’s senators, Timothy M. Kaine and Mark R. Warner, would recommend someone for the job, and the president would consider that strongly in making an appointment: http://www.washingtonpost.com/…

There is little doubt to what will happen next.

Is Tim Kaine Now a Danger to Democracy? http://reason.com/archives/201…

Virginia’s governor provides an appalling example of the crony system in VA.

Corruption? This is Virginia! http://www.baconsrebellion.com…

Connecting the Dots of Corruption: http://reason.com/archives/201…

Private-citizen Thompson, owner of multiple oceanfront properties, stands to benefit personally from the very legislation which he wrote: http://www.virginianewssource….

“Virginia has this rather elite political culture where the elites have always been somewhat immune from scrutiny” –James Madison University ethics law expert and political scientist Robert Roberts http://www.roanoke.com/news/po…

Gov. McDonnell described as aware of gifts from Virginia businessman: http://www.washingtonpost.com/…

No, NO bribes, NO favors, only “gifts”.

Government Graft, Corruption, and Retaliation in Democrat-Run Virginia: http://pjmedia.com/jchristiana…

Virginia Law Shields Police From Transparency: http://wamu.org/news/12/06/24/…

Virginia: The story behind the F score for corruption: http://www.stateintegrity.org/…

Under the “Lax Virginia Ethics Law,” there is no cap on the amount of gifts an elected official can receive, so long as all gifts valued at more than $50 are disclosed annually. Moreover, any gifts to spouses and immediate family members are not counted as gifts to the official: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bi…

House of Delegates Dave Albo and Supreme Court Regarding Judge Review. Virginia legislator Dave Albo did not follow the Virginia Supreme Court order in an oversight hearing where the legislator-lawyers “approve” the judges. In Virginia, House Delegates who appoint judges often appear before those same judges — creating a clear conflict of interest. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…

Who is going to develop state wide accountability for judicial officers in VA? All of us are aware that a court has to follow procedural guidelines mandated by law. They frequently don’t and we end up with malicious and malevolent rulings that have devastating consequences. The public has a right to hold their judicial officers and their Courts that they pay for as taxpayers accountable.

Have more examples of NO corruption in VA?

Virginia clearly cannot handle self-government. Corruption is out of control. Federal government intervention is needed. https://petitions.whitehouse.g…

Update: Impressive record of the Arlington County Board

Vornado/Charles E. Smith, a division of Vornado Realty Trust | “I urge you to perform a thorough investigation of Vornado.” — Sincerely,William J. Walczak Candidate, Mayor of Boston http://www.bostonmagazine.com/…

The board agreed to Vornado/Charles E. Smith’s plans to build as much as 1.8 million square feet of commercial space on nine acres of vacant land, one of the largest undeveloped parcels close to downtown Washington (PenPlace) http://www.washingtonpost.com/…

Chris Zimmerman’s consulting clients and “Smart Growth” “irregularities”:  http://o.canada.com/2013/06/17…

No Arlington has NO ‘Taj Mahals’, NOT AT ALL, only a $1 mil bus stop as tip of an iceberg. Building ‘Taj Mahals’ with Taxpayer Money http://voiceofsandiego.org/201…

Links:

VA Ol’ Boy Network @VAOldBoyNetwork

https://twitter.com/VAOldBoyNe…

Corruption in Arlington, Va

https://www.facebook.com/group…

Memo: State of the Campaigns

1

From the McAuliffe campaign: 

To: Interested Parties
From: Brennan Bilberry, McAuliffe Communications Director
Memo: State of the Campaigns 

It is clear that the Cuccinelli campaign is seeing the same things in their internal polls that Virginians see in public polls: Terry’s position continues to strengthen while Cuccinelli’s position continues to slip as a result of his ethics scandals and extreme social agenda. Just today, the Virginian-Pilot reported that Cuccinelli is shifting his campaign staff and focus in an effort to reverse the decline.

Those facts have caused major changes in Cuccinelli’s tactics and we wanted to provide an update on what we expect to see going forward:

1.     Desperation leads to strange tactics. This week, Politico reported that the Cuccinelli campaign is considering spending their resources on 30-minute infomercials across Virginia. This expenditure is designed to earn media coverage for advertising that will have no impact on the race.

News of 30-minute infomercials came shortly after a hastily put-together web video and interview that saw Cuccinelli simultaneously apologizing and saying he did nothing wrong while admitting for the first time that he has been questioned by the FBI about his ties to Star Scientific.

2.     Second guessing becomes more common. After weeks of resisting calls for him to return gifts from Star Scientific – at first suggesting he shouldn’t have to – Cuccinelli made the political decision to give the value of the gifts away. While he guaranteed another week of news dominated by his unethical relationship with Star, Cuccinelli’s tactic was also transparently political, coming just 8 weeks out from Election Day. Voters notice when politicians only do the right thing under pressure from polls. And editorial boards already have.  

3.     Attacks become more shrill. Cuccinelli’s strategist issued an 800-word agitated memo Wednesday attacking the Virginia media for covering his candidate’s ethical lapses. Strangely, it was released the day after the Cuccinelli campaign was asking media to cover his relationship with Star by issuing a press release and video about his gifts.  

4.     The Tea Party is BackAfter months of publicly seeking to paper over his Tea Party ideology, Cuccinelli has shifted gears. Cuccinelli’s new campaign leadership just announced a Tea Party rally being organized on Tuesday with a national right-wing radio host.

I wanted to highlight these changes because we know that the attacks from the Cuccinelli campaign are going to become more desperate and more outlandish. It already started when Cuccinelli’s campaign lied to workers to trick them into appearing in an attack ad they wanted nothing to do with.

As the Cuccinelli campaign is struggling in the final weeks, they’ll likely to engage in even more inaccurate and over-the-top attacks.

Our message is and will continue to be the same: Terry is focused on bipartisan solutions to mainstream issues like jobs, education, and transportation while Cuccinelli has spent his political career focused on an extreme, divisive social agenda. 

Interpreting President Obama’s Bad Press on Syria: A Displaced and Distorted Truth

0



It’s almost fifty years since I made the interpretation of the meaning of cultural expressions the focus of my explorations.  I spent the last two of my undergraduate years at Harvard interpreting the meanings of the paranoid fantasies of the radical right, the evolution of religious symbolism and, for my undergraduate thesis, “The Psychology of Heroic Tragedy.”  I then went to begin graduate study with the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago, having applied to pursue “the psychology and sociology of literature, religion, and politics.”

The insight, from depth psychology, that we humans are often far from fully aware of where we’re really coming from and what we’re expressing in what we say and do seemed to me crucial to understanding the human world.

Life soon took me in other directions, but that perspective has remained one of my interests and one of my tools in the years since.  In this era in which a good share of America has lost touch with reality in the political sphere, that’s been useful.  And it seems to me that the substantial erosion in our culture, in the past fifty years, of that depth-psychology insight – indeed in the whole concept of the unconscious – is quite likely related to a precipitous drop in our times in what might be called the “sanity” of American culture, in particular American political culture.

What occasions these thoughts is the spectacle this week of what seems to me a strangely misguided outpouring, from the American press, of disrespect onto President Obama for how he’s dealt with Syria.  It is those expressions that don’t make good objective sense that serve as clues to psychological forces operating beneath the surface.

Here’s how I see what’s going on.

To what I’ve already written about why “Obama’s Syrian Moves Deserve More Respect than They’re Getting,” I’ll just add that I see good decision-making as including, wherever practicable, adapting to new developments in a flexible way.  Better to be a guided missile, that can change course in mid-flight, than a bullet whose course is determined the second it leaves the barrel.  As my father, an economist used to say, “In times of uncertainty, maintain maximum flexibility.”  I think President Obama has done this pretty well,  (And the outcome is likely to be a good deal better than the kind of arrogant, “I know everything I need to know” approach that Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld followed as they created the disaster in Iraq.)

But much of the press has characterized Obama’s flexibility – his unwillingness to act precipitously in a dangerous situation without clearly good options, his adaptation to changing circumstances — as weakness.  Adapting to events is condemned as passivity.  Sharing the stage with another, not altogether friendly geo-political power, indispensable to any non-violent resolution of the crisis, is denigrated as a failure to lead.

The press speaks as if it sees all this clearly, of course.  But I think they’re unaware of what they’re really expressing.

I bet that the press would see these same Syria moves very differently if they were made by a president whom the press didn’t already perceive as passive and weak and failing to lead.  I can imagine the press praising such a president for his being careful, thoughtful, able to seize and create opportunities, not so trigger-happy as some we’ve seen as commander-in-chief, aware of the big picture, etc.

But not Obama.  Why?

The central fact of American politics right now, as most Americans experience it, is that the system is not working.  This Congress is accomplishing less than any Congress in modern times.  We have challenges, and we’re not meeting them.  Most Americans have been losing ground economically, and nothing is being done to remedy it (indeed, the gulf of economic inequality is reportedly still widening).  The government is paralyzed. (The main exception of its paralysis is in its apparent inclination to create altogether new problems with government shut-downs and defauting on the debt.)

The Democrats sit back, knowing that it’s the Republicans who are to blame, and knowing that much of the public despises the Republicans for their obstructionism.  

But this isn’t the whole of how Americans see  this paralysis and dysfunction.

If the political system is broken, what is the president doing to fix it?  “The buck stops here” is a general phenomenon in America politics:  the president is the one who’s supposed to take responsibility to see that the ship of state sails to where it needs to get.  It’s the president who is supposed to lead.

If the system is being crippled by enemies of the public interest, it’s the president’s job to go after them.

When the president sits back and seems to accept — that is, does not actively and determinedly fight to alter — a situation that the American people find Unacceptable, he will be seen as passive, as weak, as failing to lead.

So now, when the President pursues a policy that might have been praised under other circumstances, the press pounces on him, attributing to him in the Syrian situation the very qualities that he’s been showing in an altogether different realm. (This is an example of the “halo effect.”*)

The press is right that we need from Mr. Obama stronger, more active, more aggressive leadership.  They’ve just misidentified the area where it’s been lacking.  (It is often the case in human groups that important messages get delivered indirectly, or in coded form.)

So what might this more active and stronger leadership look like?  President Obama could be actively pressing the battle against the obstructionism of the Republicans.  

If the Republicans in the House can vote to repeal Obamacare 40 times, why can’t the President propose his jobs bill every week until it gets enacted?  That’s the kind of measure the polls show the American people want.  Keep the spotlight on the problem that must be addressed, on his insistence on solving it, and on the Republicans’ failure to serve the American people.

Why can’t the President hold a press conference every week, beginning each with a statement that challenges the Republicans in the Congress to pass measures that clear majorities of the public want (some by overwhelming margins), like the universal background checks on guns, or immigration reform?

Why can’t the President challenge the Republicans to a series of regular debates on a series of issues on which the public wants action, going on television with or without a Republican champion to come into the arena to defend the indefensible?

The more the president highlights what the Republicans are doing, and are failing to do, while he fights for what the public wants, the more he will be seen as a strong leader.  And the more the pressure will build on the Republicans.

That pressure on the Republicans is important.

Consider the issue du jour: the inability of Speaker of the House John Boehner to get his Republican caucus to fund the government.  Boehner is loath to disregard the infamous “Hastert Rule” and, with less than a majority of his obstreperous Republicans, to bring to the House floor a measure that, with the help of the Democrats, could get a majority of the total Congress to support it.  

The President, by pressing the battle, could change the field of forces on the Republicans. The more the public pressure on the Republicans to do the people’s business, the more the incentive for sane Republicans to create a working majority that includes Democrats. For Boehner, that becomes less dangerous than trying to keep his Teahadist Republicans behind him.

President Obama has not used the power of his office nearly as effectively as it can be used.  It’s not that he’s been weak as commander-in-chief, but as the leader of the nation.  

His pulpit has not been nearly as bully as it can be.  He has not taken nearly as active a role in leading the political process as he could.  He’s not been nearly as aggressive in going after a disgraceful opposition as the nation needs for him to be.

On all this, the press has been mostly mute.  But now this major unspoken truth is coming out but in displaced and distorted form, faulting the president in a different fight.  

I doubt the press is aware of just what they are expressing and why.

The nation would be best served, I believe, if the President would remain careful on Syria and become bolder in addressing his opponents in Congress.

• From Wikipedia: “The halo effect or halo error is a cognitive bias in which one’s judgments of a person’s character can be influenced by one’s overall impression of him or her. It can be found in a range of situations from the courtroom to the classroom and in everyday interactions.”

NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia Condemns Obenshain’s Efforts to Ban Emergency Contraceptive Pills at JMU

0

From NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia:

ALEXANDRIA – Yesterday, James Madison University students and faculty members spoke about anti-choice Attorney General candidate Mark Obenshain’s crusade to ban emergency contraception while serving as a member of the JMU Board of Visitors.

On April 18, 2003, while a member of the JMU Board of Visitors and Chair of the Education and Student Life Committee, Mark Obenshain led an effort to prohibit the university health center from dispensing emergency contraceptive pills (also known as “Plan B”).

Tarina Keene, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia, condemned this extreme effort as an example of Obenshain’s on-going crusade to restrict women’s health:

“Mark Obenshain has spent virtually his entire career attempting to insert himself in Virginians’ private, personal medical decisions. As state Senator he has made every effort to play doctor by supporting mandatory ultrasounds, crusading to close women’s health centers, and even sponsoring legislation that could banned access to abortion for victims of rape. In 2003 Obenshain decided to try his hand at pharmacy – this time by crusading to keep a common, safe, and FDA-approved method of emergency contraception from students who need it.

Like Ken Cuccinelli, Mark Obenshain has repeatedly demonstrated a complete disregard for women’s health and rights. Make no mistake: if elected Virginia’s top lawyer, Obenshain will continue to impose his extreme personal ideology on Virginia’s men, women and families. Just look at his record.”  

Mark Obenshain’s extreme record on women’s health:

  • Led the charge to stop the campus health center at James Madison University from dispensing emergency contraceptive pills. In 2003, Mark Obenshain argued that the pills induce abortion because, in some circumstances, they prevent an already fertilized egg from attaching itself to the uterus, despite the fact that the ‘morning after’ prescription pill contains levonorgestrel, a synthetic hormone that is officially a contraceptive. [See attached: The Washington Post, 04/24/03; Richmond Times Dispatch, 04/22/03; The Washington Post, 04/24/03; Harrisonburg Daily News-Record, 02/18/04]
  • ·Mark Obenshain voted in 2004, along with Ken Cuccinelli, to defeat “a ‘contraception is not abortion’ bill. Mark Obenshain and Ken Cuccinelli, on February 16, 2004, were two of 24 state senators who voted to reject Senate Bill 456, which was “a ‘contraception is not abortion’ bill.”  [Richmond Times Dispatch, 02/17/04, and SB 456, 2004] 

·  Co-Patroning the “Personhood” Bill. Obenshain has repeatedly supported “personhood” legislation that would outlaw all abortion and many common forms of birth control. [HB 2797, 2007; SB 1207, 2011]

  • Mark Obenshain, in 2012, voted for a “personhood” bill that would criminalize contraception. The bill would “effectively outlaw all” abortions in Virginia “by declaring that the rights of persons apply from the moment sperm and egg unite.”  Many “abortion-rights advocates call it nothing less than an attempt to outlaw all abortions, even in cases of rape and incest.” [HB 1, 2012] 

· Introducing A Bill That Would Require Women To Report Miscarriages To Police. “Sen. Mark D. Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, made himself a lightning rod for criticism by introducing a bill that would require a woman to report her miscarriage to police within 24 hours.” [SB 962, 2009; Virginia Lawyers Weekly, 1/28/09]

· Voting in favor of the transvaginal ultrasound bill and calling it “common sense legislation.” In 2012 Mark Obenshain voted in favor of the transvaginal ultrasound bill and the amended version of the bill. Obenshain referred to the bill as “common sense legislation” and then referred to the amended version of the bill, which changed the law form requiring a transvaginal ultrasound to a transabdominal ultrasound, the “PG version” of the bill. [HB 462, 2012; SB 484, 2012; World Virginia, 2/08/12; Obenshain Tweet, 2/27/12]

· Sponsoring a Bill To Outlaw Abortions After Twenty Weeks, Also Known As The Virginia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act Or Fetal Pain Act. In February 2012, the Daily Press reported: “Sen. Harry Blevins, R-Chesapeake, abstained Thursday, thereby killing a measure before the Senate Education and Health Committee that would have outlawed elective abortions in Virginia after 20 weeks. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Mark Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, would have made elective abortions after 20 weeks because he said there is medical evidence that a fetus can feel pain at that point in its gestation. The measure would have allowed abortions after that point if the mother’s life or health is threatened.” [Daily Press, 2/2/12; SB 637, 2012] 

PARODY: “Fight for Yesterday” SuperPAC Launches New Ad Campaign!

4

You might have seen this seriously brain-dead, crazy ad in yesterday’s Washington Post, by a new SuperPAC known as “Fight for Tomorrow”. Of course, with an Orwellian name like that, you just KNOW who’s behind it: a bunch of right-wing Republicans who want to make tomorrow much, much worse for 99% of Americans. And that’s most definitely the deal here (click here to find out more about the folks behind this one). As DNC spokesperson Mo Elleithee put it yesterday about the “Fight for Tomorrow” ad:

BWAAAAAHHH HA HA HA! Someone actually spent money to run this ad because they thought it would HELP! HA HA HA. I mean seriously! I almost wet myself laughing it’s so bad!!! BWAAAAAAAHHHH HA HA HA! Last year, terrible pro-GOP superpac ads totally backfired on their candidates. So I guess the reaction this year is to make them even worse! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!

Yeah, that about sums it up. Really, we could have just left it at that, but I figured an ad THIS BAD deserved a parody. So…that’s what I did; click on the images to “embiggen,” and (hopefully) enjoy! 🙂

P.S. Remember Stephen Colbert’s SuperPAC, “Making a better tomorrow, tomorrow?” I was thinking instead of “Fight for Tomorrow,” we could call our fake PAC “Fighting for a Worse Tomorrow, Today,” or something like that. Thoughts?

Video: New $500,000 Ad Buy Hits Ken Cuccinelli on CONSOL Energy Scandal

0

I just got off a media call with Mike Casey of NextGen Climate Action Committee Virginia, announcing this new ad hitting Ken Cuccinelli on his massive CONSOL Energy conflict of interest. According to Casey, the ad will run in the Richmond, Roanoke, and Norfolk markets for the next 10 days starting tomorrow morning, with a total purchase of $500,000.

On the call, Casey ripped into Cuccinelli, saying that although Cuccinelli attempted to dispense with the Jonnie Williams scandal a bit earlier this week, the “CONSOL scandal is far, far worse – it’s a lot more money, it’s a gross violation of public trust, and it involves an active state investigation into his office’s conduct.”  In fact, Casey added, “it appears that the only reason why [Cuccinelli himself] is not being investigated is because of the loophole in Virginia’s Inspector General law.” Casey continued:

…as Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli wasn’t just enriching himself with luxury gifts and meals from Jonnie Williams, while pleading poverty…when he was faced with calls to return that money on a $194,000-per-year salary, he was taking enormous amounts of campaign cash from an out-of-state fossil fuel company while his office helped it rip off the people that elected himCampaign shake-ups, 30-minute Hail Mary commercials, and a YouTube apology video is not going to address the very ugly timing of contributions and favors in the CONSOL scandal…

Ken Cuccinelli must release all of his office’s email contacts with CONSOL, he needs to return this dirty money, and he needs to stop ducking questions…He has run from the media, he has run from watchdog groups, and he has run from citizens – it is ridiculous…Ken Cuccinelli’s corruption is making us look like some sort of banana republic…This commercial is not going to be the last [Cuccinelli] will hear [on this issue]…

He’s in deep trouble in Southwest Virginia and he should be, because that’s where most of the people who were hurt by his actions live, and this commercial is designed to ensure that the rest of the state zeroes in on these questions and presses him for answers. We have every confidence that this is becoming not just a Southwest Virginia issue but a statewide issue

Being a climate denier and appearing to rent out the top law enforcement office [in Virginia] to an out-of-state fossil fuel company go hand and hand. It says something about your world view and your sense of priorities…relative to mainstream Virginia…The question is, are we going to be helped [in creating clean economy jobs] in Virginia, or are we going to read about them being created in China?…

In the world of Ken Cuccinelli, when you deny basic climate science, when you waste our money beating up on our flagship institution because you’ve got some  strange vendetta against one of the top climatologists in the country, and you think that an out-of-state coal, oil and gas company should be helped to rip off Virginians, it’s a pretty clear composite picture of who you are as a potential governor, and it’s not a pretty picture.

Interpreting Obama’s Bad Press on Syria — Part I: George Lakoff’s Interpretation

0



[ABS: The premise of this two-part series is that the press has been inappropriately, or at least excessively, dumping on Obama for the course he’s taken on Syria. I believe Lakoff’s ideas, below, provide one valid piece of the explanation. I’ll soon be posting some of my own thoughts, which I think add another dimension to the picture.]

Here’s the essence of Lakoff’s article, which appears in Huffington Post:

Every language in the world has a way in its grammar to express direct causation: a local application of force that has a local effect in place and time…

No language in the world has a way in its grammar to express systemic causation. You drill a lot more oil, burn a lot more gas, put a lot more CO2 in the air, the earth’s atmosphere heats up, more moisture evaporates from the oceans yielding bigger storms in certain places and more droughts and fires in other places: systemic causation.

… Systemic causation cannot be experienced directly. It has to be learned, its cases studied, and repeated communication is necessary before it can be widely understood.

To President Obama, “Syria” is not primarily about direct causation. It is about systemic causation as it affects the world as a whole. It is about preventing the proliferation of poison gas use and nuclear weapons. It is about the keeping and enforcement of treaties on these matters….But the president has not made this clear, and he could not possibly do it in one speech, given that most people don’t viscerally react to systemic causation, and many don’t understand it at all.

As a result, the president’s logic of limited bombing is not understood: he wants to bomb to prevent the systemic effect of the use of poison gas, not to stop the direct killing via other means, which we cannot stop.

Lakoff’s interpretation makes good use of cognitive psychology.  I think he captures part of the problem. I will offer, shortly, an additional interpretation which will seek to illuminate another dimension of President Obama’s bad press, drawing on the kind of psychology that deals with emotions and symbolic communication that are the province of clinical psychology.

Planned Parenthood Virginia PAC and ProgressVA to Rally Outside Cuccinelli/Rubio Fundraiser Monday

1

From Planned Parenthood Virginia PAC: 

RICHMOND —Planned Parenthood Virginia PAC and ProgressVA supporters and volunteers will gather outside the fundraiser for gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli with Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) on Monday to say they’re not fooled by Cuccinelli’s attempts to appear moderate on issues important to Virginia women and their health. Most recently, Cuccinelli told voters that he has a “flat position” on birth control and that he won’t touch contraception if elected governor in November — despite the fact that his record confirms he believes the opposite. 

Participants will hold bright pink “Keep Ken Out” signs and will be joined by Planned Parenthood Votes’ human-sized birth control pill pack named Pillamina. They will remind attendees of Marco Rubio’s co-sponsorship of the much-talked-about Blunt amendment, which would have allowed bosses to refuse to cover birth control in their health care plans. 

“We aren’t fooled by Ken Cuccinelli’s attempts to appear moderate and Virginia voters shouldn’t be either. We know where he really stands and that’s why we’ll be calling attention to his campaign fundraiser with Florida Senator Marco Rubio – a leading opponent of women’s health in the Senate. When it comes to women’s health, Cuccinelli and Rubio are two peas in a pod,” said Cianti Stewart-Reid, executive director, Planned Parenthood Virginia PAC. 

Cuccinelli was the first attorney general in the country to file a lawsuit against the Affordable Care Act and argued that opponents of the law should be willing to “go to jail” to fight the benefit which requires insurance companies to cover the full cost of birth control, just as they would other preventive care. Cuccinelli was also a co-sponsor of a so-called “personhood” bill. If enacted, Cuccinelli’s legislation could have interfered with a woman’s personal medical decisions about birth control, access to fertility treatment, management of miscarriage, and access to safe and legal abortion. 

WHO: Planned Parenthood Virginia PAC and Progress VA supporters and volunteers.
WHAT: A rally to help Keep Ken Out of the governor’s mansion.
WHY: To hold Ken Cuccinelli accountable for his dangerous record and agenda for women’s health.
WHERE: Richmond Marriott Hotel; 500 E Broad St., Richmond, VA 23219.
WHEN:
 Monday, September 16 at 11 a.m. 

Like Cuccinelli, Senator Rubio has a record of extreme opposition to women’s health:

·         Rubio co-sponsored the much-talked-about Blunt amendment, which would have allowed bosses to refuse to cover birth control in their health care plans.

·         In July, Rubio published an op-ed where he called the Affordable Care Act — a law that has already benefitted 765,000 Virginia women who are receiving preventive care like birth control and cancer screenings with no additional co-pay — “disastrous.” 

·         Rubio has volunteered to be the lead sponsor on an extreme and dangerous nationwide 20-week abortion ban.

·         Rubio supports cutting off women from Planned Parenthood’s preventive health care services such as birth control and lifesaving cancer screenings, saying he has “problems with what Planned Parenthood does.”

·         Rubio refused to support the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act. While Cuccinelli was one of only three state attorneys general to refuse to support its reauthorization, Rubio voted against the bipartisan measure to combat domestic violence and sexual assault – twice. 

Audio: Leading Right-Wing Radio Talk Show Host Rips Cuccinelli Campaign

2

Far-right-wing radio talk show host Steve Deace (among other things, he “believes the Bible is literally true and the Constitution isn’t a living, breathing document”) is particularly angry at Cuccinelli campaign consultant Brett O’Donnell. Why? For supposedly ruining the great Ken Cuccinelli, that beacon of “liberty,” the “constitution” and whatever other buzzwords the Teahadist extremists are throwing around these days to try to prove they’re not radical nut jobs (which, of course they are).

More to the point, you’ve gotta love the post mortems already beginning for Ken Cuccinelli’s shambolic gubernatorial campaign among the Tea Party set. And guess what? That’s right, the reasoning is NOT that Cuccinelli is wayyyyy to far right for Virginia (or Attila the Hun, for that matter), but that he’s been coopted by the GOP “establishment” and, as a result, he’s lost his edge, along with everything that made him “great” (to these crazy people, that is). Yes, they’re all completely delusional, but that’s the mindset we’re dealing with. Amazing, isn’t it?

P.S. Don’t miss Julian Walker’s scoop, Trailing McAuliffe, Cuccinelli changes staff, focus. Key quotes: 1) Larry Sabato says “You do not shake up a winning team…You shake up a team when its campaign seems to be losing“; 2) a “Republican familiar with the inner workings of Cuccinelli’s operation” says “They are circling the wagons, trying to rescue the campaign.”

Virginia News Headlines: Friday Morning

1

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, September 13.

*Kerry: U.S. ready to strike if Syria deal not reached (That’s right, keep the pressure on…diplomacy goes hand in hand with the credible threat of military force. That’s a no brainer.)

*Democrats reject GOP efforts to delay or curtail funding for health-care law (Don’t give in to the Republican/Teahadist hostage-taking nihilists on this, or on the debt ceiling.)

*John Boehner, Eric Cantor struggle to lead House (The problem is, the Teahadists are fanatics, also crazy, ergo how the heck can you lead them? By the way, thanks to the corporate media for largely creating – and sustaining – the Teabaggers.)

*The American people’s reply to Putin (My reply to KGB thug, liar, and tyrant Vladimir? The ol’ Jersey Salute! Pretty exceptional, huh Vlad? LOL)

*Cuccinelli’s damage control too late (“Mr. Cuccinelli, like Mr. McDonnell, is not answering relevant questions. Each insists he did nothing to help Mr. Williams or Star Scientific. Yet the common denominator in both cases is bad judgment, as well as a foot-dragging reluctance to do ‘the right thing, plain and simple,’ until damage control and political self-preservation required it.”)

*The gift Virginia is giving America (“Over the next five years, Virginians will pay an average of $1,250 in additional taxes to support the federal Affordable Care Act…Nearly every one of those additional tax dollars could be funneled right back to the commonwealth if state lawmakers and Gov. Bob McDonnell agreed to expand Medicaid, the health insurance program for the poor.”)

*Trailing McAuliffe, Cuccinelli changes staff, focus (“Other distractions stemming from his work as attorney general seem more of Cuccinelli’s own making because he chose to keep that job while seeking higher office.” Right, Cooch can shake up his campaign all he wants, but the one he REALLY needs to shake up is…himself!)

*Va. Supreme Court rules against ODU in eminent domain case (“The decision likely brings to an end a battle between ODU and a group of property owners in Norfolk who have fought to keep land on which the university had hoped to expand”)

*In new ad, Cuccinelli calls out McAuliffe on coal (In fact, research has shown that coal mining is a loser – economically, environmentally, health-wise – in basically every way. For instance, “mountaintop removal mining’s economic cost to Appalachian communities totaled roughly $42 billion per year in lost health and lives.”)

*Northam: Opponent’s school plan a ‘recipe for disaster’

*Virginia high court justice has a history in tunnel case (“Before he was a Virginia Supreme Court justice, William C. Mims worked briefly for the law firm that is now defending the constitutionality of Hampton Roads’ tunnel tolls”)

*Metro spends $1.5 billion to replace more than half of system’s rail cars

*WWTJD? (“A UVa panel is pondering the idea of more autonomy from state government.”)

*The VRS board awarded almost $4.5 million in bonuses

*Today’s autumnal breeze foretells a gorgeous weekend in the District

*Washington Post: Redskins’ name needs to go (Unless you think it would be ok to call the team any other racial or ethnic slur, that is…)

*Hot-hitting Nats sweep Mets (“After victory finishes off a sweep of the Mets, the Nats have won eight of nine, 23 out of 32 and a season-best six in a row.” Still probably too late, but you never know…)