Home Blog Page 2347

“Slap Hillary in the Face” Guy Has Close Connections to VA House Speaker Howell, Rep. Wittman

3

UPDATE: Chris Marston responds in the comments section of this post.

Wonderful, eh?

The Hillary Project, a super PAC that calls itself the “only thing standing between” former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) and the White House, has posted a video game in which players are encouraged to slap Clinton across her face. The sole officer identified on the PAC’s public filings, Christopher M. Marston, is a Republican operative with ties to several prominent GOP officeholders.

[…]

Marston, a former Alexandria, VA Republican chairman, an unsuccessful 2011 candidate for Clerk of the City Court, and an Assistant Secretary of Education in the George W. Bush adminsitration, is treasurer of The Hillary Project…

…Marston, who served as treasurer for the pro-Rick Santorum Red, White, and Blue fund in 2012, also currently serves in a similar role for leadership PACs for Rep. Marlin Stuzman (R-IN), Rep. Rob Wittman (R-VA), and Virginia Speaker of the House William Howell (R). None of those three responded immediately to ThinkProgress inquiries about their reaction to the game and their treasurer’s involvement.

Why am I note surprised at any of this, from the “war on women” party?

McAuliffe Applauds Lieutenant Governor Bolling for Ethics Reform Proposal

0

From the McAuliffe for Governor campaign:

Virginia gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe applauded the ethics reform proposal Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling released today, saying he supports the plan and would build off of it in a few areas:

“After the gift scandal that has engulfed Richmond and hurt the Commonwealth’s reputation, Virginians deserve to hear support for specific ethics reforms,” stated McAuliffe. “Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling’s ethics plan is a strong, pragmatic proposal that I would support as Governor. I applaud him for stepping forward on this critical issue.

“There are some places where I would build on Lt. Gov. Bolling’s proposal:

1. While I agree with the proposal to ban aggregate annual gifts exceeding $250, I have also supported a total ban on individual gifts over $100. Even if the legislature does not pass my proposal, I will use an executive order to impose it on myself. 

2. The independent ethics commission I proposed in April would include commission members appointed by all branches of government and would be funded by lobbyist registration fees.

“The most important part of Lieutenant Governor Bolling’s proposal is the recognition that a hard limit on gifts is critical to restore trust in Virginia government. While my opponent has so far refused to support any specific gift ban, I urge him to reconsider and join me in supporting the plan announced today.” 

Background:

Full Details of Terry’s Gift Ban Available Here

Full Details on Terry’s Independent Ethics Commission Available Here

HEADLINE: McAuliffe proposes gift limits for public officials [Virginian-Pilot, 4/25/13]

McAuliffe Proposed Gift Ban on Gifts over $100, Pledged to Impose It Upon Himself If Elected by Executive Order

In April 2013, the Virginian-Pilot reported, “Democrat Terry McAuliffe says if he's elected governor he'll ban gifts of $100 or more to a governor or their family, a proposal made as two of Virginia's top Republican officials face nagging questions about gifts given to them by a political donor. The candidate making his second gubernatorial bid said Thursday he'd accomplish that first through an executive order, then urge the General Assembly to change the law so that policy also applies to members of the legislature. ‘Virginia taxpayers deserve to know that their elected officials are representing the Commonwealth first,’ McAuliffe noted Thursday in announcing a plan he said would enhance transparency in state government.” [Virginian-Pilot, 4/25/13]

Democratic Ticket United Behind McAuliffe’s Gift Ban, Would Also Impose It Upon Themselves if Elected

In July 2013, the Tysons Corner Patch reported, “State Sens. Mark Herring (D-Loudoun) and Ralph Northam (D-Norfolk), Democratic candidates for attorney general and lieutenant governor, said they too would follow the ban, even if it failed to become law.” [Tysons Corner Patch, 7/2/13

HEADLINE: McAuliffe Proposes Ethics Commission to Oversee Elected Officials [NBC 29, 4/30/13]

McAuliffe Proposed Independent, Bipartisan Ethics Commission

In April 2013, the Washington Post reported, “Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe on Tuesdayproposed forming an independent ethics commission to oversee elected officials and their staff.” [Washington Post,4/30/13]

McAuliffe’s Independent Ethics Commission Would Be Comprised of Members Selected by the Governor, the Speaker of the House of Delegates, the Senate Majority Leader and the Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court

In April 2013, the Washington Post reported, “McAuliffe said the bipartisan panel’s members would be chosen by the governor, the speaker of the House of Delegates and the Senate Majority Leader. The chief justice of the Virginia Supreme Court would also select two members, who could be a retired judge, active member of the bar or a law professor.” [Washington Post, 4/30/13] 

Mark Herring Statement on 48th Anniv. of the Passage of the Voting Rights Act

2

From the Mark Herring for AG campaign:

Democratic nominee for Attorney General, State Senator Mark Herring issued the following statement today celebrating the 48th anniversary of the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965:

“On August 6, 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act, a monumental law that helped the United States rid itself of state-sanctioned voter disenfranchisement. Forty-eight years later, the Voting Rights Act remains critical to ensuring that every citizen is free to exercise his or her constitutional right to vote.

“Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has severely weakened a key provision of this law that has kept Virginia’s elections free, fair and accessible. We have come a long way since 1965, but Virginia has not outgrown the Voting Rights Act and I remain steadfast in calling on Congress to rectify the court’s decision.

“Virginians need only look at our records to find a stark difference between me and my opponent Senator Mark Obenshain on the issue of voting rights. In response to the unacceptably long lines we saw in Virginia last November, I introduced legislation earlier this year that contained a number of common sense reforms to improve voter access to the polls and speed voting.  Mark Obenshain, as Chairman of the Senate Privileges and Elections Committee, led the charge against that bill and it was defeated in his committee.

“Mark Obenshain’s response was to champion a restrictive Voter ID bill, claiming that ‘voter fraud’ is rampant in Virginia despite no evidence to support that claim. Thanks to the Voting Rights Act, devices such as poll taxes and literacy tests are a thing of the past, but we must remain vigilant and oppose efforts to erect new barriers to the ballot box. Despite his claims to the contrary, Mark Obenshain’s Voter ID law is just that, a new barrier to the ballot box for many Virginia seniors, students and minorities.

“As Attorney General, I will always stand up to protect Virginians’ right to vote.”

Why Real Reformers Want a Virginia Special Ethics Session

4

(Note: Paul actually wrote about this back in April here on Blue Virginia (“Gift Wrapped: VA Dems Should Call for Special Session to Fix, Expand Rule”). He was, foolishly, ignored.   – promoted by lowkell)

by Paul Goldman

If Democrats really want Ethics Reform, they are making a huge mistake. Governor McDonnell’s repeated rejection of a call for a Special Ethics Session points out the self evident: he isn’t a real reformer on ethics. Surprise? Hardly. Last April, in this space, I laid out the case for a Special Session, saying why Democrats risked making a huge mistake by failing to seize the reform opportunity of a lifetime in Virginia. Of course the special interests, McDonnell and the like don’t want real reform: of course they promise “next year.” And mark my words: “Next year” they will appoint a blue ribbon commission to “study” it so no mistakes are made. Tim Kaine and I learned the hard way how that works [see below].

But first, let me point out – given the current political climate – that unlike others I have

a proven record of real success in reforming the perks/privileges of politicians, not like my critics who have derided my call for a Special Session. There are no saints in politics, myself included. But there are real reformers. Back in the late 1990’s, I became the first citizen to ever force any state legislative body anywhere in America to give up an illegal pay raise and reform their “sweetheart” pension and pay plan. On my own “nickel” as they say, I filed a suit against Democratic Speaker Tom Moss and GA leaders, the case eventually going to the Supreme Court of Virginia. I got the Republican AG at the time – Mark Earley – and former GOP Party Chair Pat McSweeney to join me. Pat and I held a press conference, threatening to sue everyone if Earley didn’t use his power to block an unconstitutional pay raise and stop the pay/pension rip-off of the taxpayers. The GA was using office expenses to pad their base pay for pension calculations among other abuses that were outlawed in other pension plans except those for legislators!

True, who else but Pat and I would actually read the fine print of the friggin’ pension laws. Earley blinked: and played Roberto Duran, agreeing to sue if the GA didn’t back down. Furious at me (’til this day, since they said I cost them $10 million collectively), Moss and the GA backed down: they rescinded the pay raise, first time ever, and promised to clean up their pay and pension scheme [which they half did since I was still suing on other stuff.

The real irony: Even though I had a big win thanks to Earley, the kid here decided to go for the whole taco and take his case to the Supreme Court anyway, hoping to win more reforms. But the Court, in the seminal opinion on citizen suits in Virginia, rejected the rule, and other state cases cited. Instead, they declared that in Virginia, citizens had no standing to bring such challenges, even if they were right on state constitutional law grounds. The merits didn’t matter one way or another: without standing, you never get to the merits. The case is Goldman v Sidle, I think (it has been a while) but that is close enough for legal work. Win some, lose some. But never give up.

Bottom line: You can win real ethics reform if you seize the moment. The Richmond Times Dispatch endorsed my efforts, and Earley read that stuff. Also, in those days, the RTD editorial page actually had some influence on GOP hopefuls for Governor. So I gambled that Earley would help.

Fast Forward To Today: McDonnell’s weakness on ethics and his desperate need to do something allows Democrats to force him into a Special Session, even though he doesn’t want to do it, nor do the House of Delegate Republicans running for re-election this year. But based on all the texts and emails I have gotten in the last 24 hours, Democrats are telling me this: “Paul, like it or not, Ken Cuccinelli has now called for a Special Session on Ethics. Why should Democrats help him get that?”

My response: This is NOT about Cuccinelli or anyone…it is about DOING THE RIGHT THING FOR VIRGINIA. Why? Let me explain, and it shows you why being bipartisan is so hard.

5 REASONS WHY GOLDMAN REFORM II WILL WORK

1. If you hold a Special Session during the campaign, Speaker Howell can not let his posse be seen as weaker on Ethics than the Democrats. He can’t afford to give Democrats that issue this fall. But next year, safely elected, Republicans can blink, they can put the issue into a “blue ribbon” study, and kill it by waiting for the reform fever to pass. CASE STUDY THAT TAUGHT ME THIS LESSON. Back in the 1990’s, Tim Kaine tried to get African-Americans (and whites too, of course, but the issue really played out in the African-American community) their right to elect the Mayor in Richmond. This required a Charter Change, meaning it had to pass the General Assembly.However, the city’s top African-American legislators didn’t want to give people the right to vote. They liked the status quo, which let the City Council choose the Mayor, since they controlled the Council or thought they did. So even though the public wanted it, and had voted for it, the GA killed it.

FAST FORWARD TO 2004: In that year, the Goldman-authored Charter Change Amendment to give folks the right to vote for their Mayor in Richmond came to the General Assembly. But I had been slicker than Tim, gaming the system better. Also, my reform legislation had the backing of former Governor Wilder (I had written it for his commission), LG Tim Kaine and we had the GOP legislators on board (a necessity since a Charter Change takes a super majority to pass). The African-American lawmakers, led by Delegate Jones and Senator Marsh, objected, tried to kill it. But in the end, they relented. Jones is now Mayor, admitting the Elected Mayor reform saved Richmond from a corrupt system (of course, it is being re-corrupted but that is another story).

BOTTOM LINE: Timing is everything with the GA. A Special Session this August or September, with the voters ready to vote in November, WILL GET THE BEST REFORM. You wait until the pressure is off, you let the special interests play their power games during the regular 2014 Session, and the GA will do far less.

2. Cuccinelli’s support is a GOOD THING if you are a REAL REFORMER. My not-so-smart phone is full of texts and emails saying Cuccinelli is faking, he is just using this as a ploy. My response: That is so childish. Dr. King had it right: When a thing is right, the time is always right. Let’s assume Cuccinelli isn’t sincere, that he is just seizing a political opportunity. My response: You don’t think some Democrats are doing the same thing in refusing to back reform now, willing to sacrifice real reform on the theory they can get more votes by keeping the mess alive through November? “Man up” for gosh sakes. This is how politics works: YOU KEEP YOU EYE ON WHAT THE PEOPLE NEED AND YOU MAKE IT HAPPEN AS BEST YOU CAN. If Democrats keep up this “holier than thou” attitude on reform, they could actually lose a sure win this November. Mark my words.

3. Dr. King said that when a thing is right, the time is always right. Okay, I just said this before. But his wisdom is worth double anyone else in Virginia today, at least.

4. The election is not about Cuccinelli, but about Virginians. That means it isn’t about McAuliffe either, or anyone else running statewide. GET WITH THIS MINDSET OR LOSE. The reason I was the first to predict a Dem sweep this year is simple: I believe the substance of the issues is all in favor of the Dems right now, because Cuccinelli’s campaign has been incompetent in that regard. Whether sincere or not – I don’t judge, I follow Dr. King’s rule of focusing on the issue not the personality – Cuccinelli’s support makes it harder for McDonnell to stonewall if Democrats join the call for a Special Session on Ethics.

5. How, exactly, does it hurt Democrats this year to be able to take credit for forcing Bill Howell and his Republicans to fix up the Ethics laws before the election? Someone will have to explain that one to me.

Bottom line #1: Anyone who has had any success in politics knows INSTINCTIVELY that you are going to have to force politicians to give up their perks and privileges. They only do it under DURESS, which to them is the threat of suffering a political problem with the voters. None of the special interest groups want ethics reform now do they? This would reduce their leverage!

Bottom line #2: Bob McDonnell has proven himself to be the anti-Ethics guy. So of course he doesn’t want a Special Session. He wants to make proposals to the applause of Bill Howell, who will appoint a blue ribbon commission to study stuff “because we need to get this right.”  Right. If you want real reform, then you do it when the GOP – and frankly some Democrats – can’t refuse: that is, right now.

I learned that working Tim Kaine on my Mayor’s law. I learned that when I was the only white guy willing to help Wilder. Everyone loves to claim this or that TODAY. But back then, you couldn’t find any reformers. Sometimes you try and fail, other times you try and win. But this is true no matter what: A united Democratic call for a Special Session is a NO LOSER FOR THE DEMOCRATS.

So what if Cuccinelli called for it yesterday? The public wants change: why risk allowing him to be seen as more willing to do the right thing? Cuccinelli has his ethics issues to be sure. But if Democrats think it is just a one-way street this year, then go out and talk to real voters like some of us do. You might be surprised. Humility is far better political strategy than misplaced arrogance.    

As Dr. King wisely pointed out, truth crushed to earth will rise. The voters are speaking through the polls. Whether they are right or wrong about the candidates doesn’t matter in the end, if this is what the voters think. As they say: on election Day, the voters are never wrong, even if they are.

Doing the right thing might not always be the winning strategy. But when it comes to what the voters want to hear, it is never a losing strategy.

Hey, Cantor, the “Deficit Crisis” Doesn’t Exist

5

Eric Cantor is back home from voting a 40th time to overturn “Obamacare,” with a pit stop at Fox News where he spouted the latest right-wing talking points about how we have to cut “entitlements” to get the House to fund the government for the next fiscal year because of the “deficit crisis.”  But, guess what? There IS no run-away budget deficit. In spite of the do-nothing GOP House of Representatives and the filibuster-loving Senate GOP minority, the deficit is under control. This deficit reduction wasn’t done the right way, nor was it done in a way to actually improve government efficiency. Atlantic magazine this month explains just how deficit management was stumbled into, in spite of the Republican-caused gridlock in Washington.

The first step to lowering the deficit was the fiscal-cliff deal the president got Congress to agree to before the first of the year, the deal that raised income tax rates on wealthy Americans. Then, because Congress refused to act to stop a ridiculous sequester that was so extreme no one figured it would happen, another $1 trillion will be lopped off the deficit by the end of the next decade. Those combined actions, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, are sufficient to stabilize the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio. That means the debt is no longer growing faster than the U.S. economy. The deficit crisis is over. As the economy slowly regains momentum after the Great Recession, the improvement in the deficit picture will become even more pronounced.

It’s time to declare victory in the deficit war and work to replace the idiotic sequester with more reasonable and sustainable budget constraints. Plus, Congress needs to raise the debt limit and pass a budget. However, Cantor and his tea-poisoned majority in the House now insist that Social Security and Medicare have to be slashed. Since neither one caused the deficit in the first place, it would be foolish to agree to whatever cockamamie scheme Cantor and company have planned to wreck the social safety net for seniors.  

There is no Social Security crisis, never has been. That being said, President Obama offered the GOP a deal in 2012 that upset his base greatly, when he offered to change the cost of living adjustment in Social Security to a “chained CPI.” That one change would have made Social Security solid for decades to come, but there is a far better way to do that. Raise the amount of wages subject to Social Security taxes over time until any gap between income and expenditure is taken care of. Voila! Problem solved.

As President Obama has said over and over, and as budget experts have corroborated, Medicare is a budget problem over the long term. After all, Medicare insures the oldest and sickest citizens, many of whom could never get insurance in the private marketplace. One of the purposes of the Affordable Care Act was to slow the growth of Medicare and Medicaid spending by slowing the overall health care costs. CNN reports that result is already happening.

“Cost-conscious consumers are a major factor driving the slowdown [in health care spending]…An Affordable Care Act provision that went into effect in late 2012, which aims to limit return visits to hospitals, is also playing a part in slowing spending.”

I believe that Eric Cantor and others in the dysfunctional Republican Party have now returned to their attempts to starve what they derisively call “entitlements,” programs that American citizens pay for during their working lives through payroll taxes, because there is a huge pushback by Republicans in the House against the sequester cuts. Proof is in the way Cantor and Boehner had to pull their transportation bill just before they left for their five-week vacation. When GOPers saw how their sequester-inspired cuts would hit transportation spending back in their own districts, the votes to pass the bill melted into thin air.

Check out this statement from House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers, a Republican: “The House has declined to proceed on the implementation of the very budget it adopted just three months ago. Thus, I believe that the House has made its choice: sequestration – and its unrealistic and ill-conceived discretionary cuts – must be brought to an end.”

Cantor and the rest of the Republican Virginia congressional delegation seem ready to spend their time fighting with one another about what to cut, when to cut, rather than governing the nation. They all knew that Virginia would get a double whammy with sequester cuts to defense and to the federal workforce. Yet, it went into effect and ironically has helped solved the deficit crisis in the worst possible way. My advice to Eric Cantor is simple: Shut up about the “deficit crisis,” end the sequester and try to govern, for a change.

Virginia News Headlines: Tuesday Morning

2

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, August 6. Happy birthday to my beautiful wife, Kelly!

*Why RNC Chairman Reince Priebus Is Freaking Out Over Pop Culture’s Hillary Rodham Clinton Obsession

*An era to end as Post is sold (“Graham family to sell flagship paper to Amazon founder…The $250 million deal to buy the paper and some of its affiliate publications will likely be finalized within 60 days”)

*Journalism needs a business model. Can Jeff Bezos find one? (That’s the big question. I’d say if anyone can do it, Jeff Bezos can!)

*Will Kaplan survive without WaPo? (Yeah, if it continues to be subsidized by the taxpayer!)

*Tarring democracy in North Carolina (“It will be harder to cast a ballot in North Carolina now, thanks to a catch-all set of anti-voter legislation that – as it did in other states – addresses a problem that doesn’t appear to actually exist.”)

*Jackson won’t apologize for labeling Democratic Party the ‘anti-God party’ (“Jackson’s campaign responded by stating that his statements had been taken out of context and misrepresented.” Isn’t outright lying considered un-Christian?)

*Today’s top opinion: Dark despair (“Ken Cuccinelli has problems, too. His relations with Williams might not have been as extensive and as vivid as McDonnell’s, but he benefited from the relationship nevertheless. The connection could prove toxic.”)

*A campaign under a cloud (“An investigation of McAuliffe’s former company becomes the latest  scandal tainting governor’s race.”)

*Cuccinelli pushes for legislative special session on gifts (And Bob McDonnell immediately rejects it.)

*Cuccinelli, McAuliffe address mental health (“Ken Cuccinelli II touted tax cuts and preschool vouchers while Terry McAuliffe embraced Medicaid expansion Monday night as the candidates for Virginia governor laid out different visions for improving mental health in Virginia.” What on earth? How the hell would tax cuts and preschool vouchers address mental health issues? Someone?)

*On Medicaid expansion: McAuliffe yes, Cuccinelli no (And how is NOT expanding Medicaid going to help treat mental illness among poor people?)

*Virginia Governor’s Race: Negative And Getting More So

*McAuliffe hit by trio of ads; environmentalist billionaire to fund anti-Cuccinelli spots

*Candidates won’t budge on Greentech or Star Scientific

*Gubernatorial candidates appear in Norfolk today

*Former assistant AG sues Cuccinelli over firing

*Libertarian Sarvis: ABC should cede law enforcement power to police

*Tea Party pressures Forbes to endorse Va. GOP ticket

*McDonnell leads education summit in Fairfax (“The summit covered student loan debt, teacher compensation and low-performing schools.” How about “ethics?”)

*Trending warmer with climbing humidity and shower chances

*Nationals fail to take advantage (“Washington squanders multiple opportunities as Atlanta wins its 11th straight and stretches its lead in the NL East to 13.5 games.”))

A Few Unsolicited Suggestions to Jeff Bezos, New Owner of the Washington Post

4

First, the big news:

The Washington Post Co. has agreed to sell its flagship newspaper to Amazon.com founder and chief executive Jeffrey P. Bezos, ending the Graham family’s stewardship of one of America’s leading news organizations after four generations.

Bezos, whose entrepreneurship has made him one of the world’s richest men, will pay $250 million in cash for The Post and affiliated publications to the Washington Post Co., which owns the newspaper and other businesses.

Wow, that is big news. And hopefully GOOD news, because as you might have noticed, I haven’t exactly been a big fan of the Post for a long time now. I particularly haven’t appreciated its increasingly right-leaning editorial page, its cowardly insistence on false equivalency (e.g., giving climate science deniers a say in almost every article on climate change) in its supposedly “objective” reporting, its overall pro-corporate (and increasingly conservative) tilt, its decreased coverage of Virginia politics (although Rosalind Helderman has certainly done a great job on the McDonnell/Star Scientific/”Chefgate” story), its tolerance for climate science deniers among its op-ed writers, its almost complete lack of coverage on environmental issues like climate change, etc., etc. Anyway, I’m overall very happy to see the ownership changing, and hope that means significant changes to a dying newspaper (e.g., circulation down from 752k per day in 2005 to about 448k per day in 2013). Because, bottom line, we NEED strong, thriving, serious journalism in this country, and certainly in the nation’s capital!

With that, here are a few unsolicited suggestions for Jeff Bezos, just for starters. Feel free to add your own in the comments section. Thanks.

*Immediately fire anyone who denies climate science or outright lies in the Post editorial pages. That means, yes, bye bye George Will, Charles Krauthammer and Marc Thiessen. Replace them with reality-based conservative commentators, if you can find any. While we’re on this topic, send your reporters to training in science, first and foremost climate science. If that doesn’t work fire them and hire some new ones who understand this stuff.

*Axe Jennifer Rubin ASAP. She is a total hack, not in any way a “journalist,” and a disgrace to this once-great newspaper. Of course, she DOES draw (beady) eyeballs to the online “paper,” and that’s the challenge: how to increase online readership without completely compromising the quality of the newspaper.

*Figure out how to interact with blogs and other new media (e.g., ArlNow). The Post can start by first and foremost not plagiarizing/stealing their content, second by giving new media (and even old media!) proper credit and attribution for their ideas, scoops, etc.

*Fix the comments section or eliminate it. Right now, as one commenter (ironically?) notes, “Perhaps now we can have the comment boards moderated and get rid of the thousands of useless, ignorant, hate filled comments.” Truly, it is a troll fest – bigotry, ad hominem attacks run amok, just insane. Compare that to the NY Times comments section, where, as another commenter points out: “readers tend to be far more literate and thoughtful in their remarks while those found on The Post’s website appear to be hateful, thoughtless remarks made by people with limited abilities to think and/or express themselves.”

*Totally revamp the Sunday magazine. I was at the gym today and somebody left the NY Times Sunday magazine, so I was reading it. I mean, seriously, that thing is about a gazillion times better than the Post’s Sunday vehicle for “Date Lab,” a restaurant review, and the crossword puzzle. Get serious with this, or get rid of it.

*Beef up local coverage, including serious coverage (e.g., not just horse race stuff) of Virginia politics. As I pointed out last December, it’s been on a downward spiral for a few years now…

*It’s long, LOOOOONG past time to get someone new to write the Post’s Virginia political endorsements. Long-time international correspondent Lee Hockstader, who’s been writing these endorsements under the Post’s name at least since 2006 (when he endorsed corporate lobbyist Harris Miller over Jim Webb), knows little if anything about Virginia politics and should be replaced by someone who actually knows what he or she is doing.

*Get someone like Nate Silver who understands quantitative analysis, polling, statistics, math, etc. It would really help avoid ridiculous “reporting” as happened in the 2012 Obama-Romney race, when the Post seemed to buy into the narrative that the race was tightening, that Ohio had flipped to tossup in the closing days, etc. WRONG! Meanwhile, Nate Silver – and others who do what Nate does, it’s not just him! –  consistently nailed it.

P.S. By the way, I checked Jeff Bezos’ Wikipedia entry, and it says he’s a “libertarian” who “donated $2.5 million to pass a same-sex marriage referendum in Washington” and has donated to both the Democratic and Republican parties (although more to the “blue” team).

Republican Governor’s Association “Logic”: Mark Obenshain is One of the Worst Liars Ever?

7

According to the Republican Governor’s Association (on behalf of the Ken Cuccinelli campaign), “Terry McAuliffe has been in politics his entire adult life. That’s why he just can’t tell the truth.” So, let’s get this straight: if you’ve been in politics your “entire adult life,” then you “just can’t tell the truth.” Of course, that’s ridiculous, but let’s just go with it for a minute and apply it to Virginia Republican Attorney General candidate Mark Obenshain. Here’s what Obenshain says about himself on his very own website.

Growing up in a home in which the discussion of politics was standard fare around the dinner table each night, the son of the man often dubbed the architect of the modern Republican Party of Virginia, Mark developed a passion for politics and a zeal for public service early in life

Mark has been politically active practically his entire life. He has served as the chairman of two Republican committees, has been a delegate to every Republican state convention since 1980, and was a member of Virginia’s delegation to the 1980 Republican National Convention, which nominated Ronald Reagan. Mark has worked on the campaigns of virtually every Republican nominee for state and local office since he began practicing law in Harrisonburg in 1987, and he serves as the President of the Richard D. Obenshain Foundation, which provides the Republican Party of Virginia with the building that is its permanent home.

That’s right, Obenshain hasn’t just been active politically his entire adult life. He’s been active politically “practically his entire life,” in his own words. Now, personally I think that’s fine. But according to the RGA and Obenshain’s running mate, Ken Cuccinelli, it is REALLY bad news. Why? Because if Terry McAuliffe “just can’t tell the truth” (aka, is a liar) as a result of him being involved in politics his “entire adult life,” then Mark Obenshain must be one of the worst liars EVER, having proudly admitted to being involved in politics “practically his entire life.” Hmmmm.

P.S. Of course, Ken Cuccinelli himself has been involved in politics most of his adult life. But then again, we already knew HE was a liar.

Del. Jennifer McClellan, Rev. Robin Gorsline Condemn EW Jackson’s “offensive,” “hateful rhetoric”

2

I just got off a call with Delegate Jennifer McClellan and Rev. Doctor Robin Gorsline (President of People of Faith for Equality in Virginia) to discuss EW Jackson’s latest offensive remarks, this time claiming that Democrats are “anti-God.” According to Del. McClellan:

As the daughter of a minister, I know firsthand that EW Jackson’s claim last week that Democrats are anti-God is not only not true, but is downright offensive. To suggest that one party has a monopoly on what is right in the eyes of God is offensive not only to me but to millions of Virginians, both Christians and non-Christians…Mr. Jackson’s comments are irresponsible and I call on him to apologize for them immediately. Virginians of all faiths, of all political affiliations, find these comments destructive to democracy…the Democratic Party is full of people like myself who have focused more on God’s message of love and doing for those who are less fortunate…loving thy neighbor as thyself. His hateful comments go directly against some of the most important teachings of God. Again, he should apologize for it; it’s not constructive in this race, it only serves to divide Virginians more…

According to Rev. Doctor Robin Gorsline:

…how disturbing Bishop Jackson’s comments are…people are involved in all sorts of faiths in our community and our Commonwealth, and those who are not also people of faith. And to have Bishop Jackson continue this rhetoric of dividing those who are on the “good” side and those he wants to cast into outer darkness is not the way to lead or be a responsible leader in our Commonwealth…he’s seeking now to be a leader of our whole people…Christian faith, Jewish faith, other faiths…those of no faith…[Jackson] has to learn how to do that, and he’s not doing that. He’s hurting untold people all across the Commonwealth with those kinds of comments. I believe he owes an apology to those who are not of his particular faith brand who he’s casting out. He owes an apology to those who may have a very different idea of who God is for them. I’m actually a little disturbed that after four days after he made these latest round of remarks…that both of his running mates, Attorney General Cuccinelli and Senator Obenshain, haven’t disavowed these comments, even though the chairman of their party has done so, and I thank him for that…You just don’t go around telling people that they’re not godly people. Well, everybody is God’s child. Every single Virginian, every single American, every single citizen of the world is a child of God. And Bishop Jackson just isn’t getting that. That kind of divisive rhetoric just has no place in a political campaign, it hurts our community…if he would [apologize for his latest remarks] maybe we could  get this campaign to be on a more civil basis talking about real issues and not simply setting up straw people and then knocking them down with hateful rhetoric