Home Blog Page 2454

Virginia News Headlines: Monday Morning

3

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Monday, Inauguration Day, January 21. We’re all justifiably proud and happy that we helped reelect Barack Obama. We’re also incredibly relieved that we dodged the bullet of what would have been an utterly ruinous, disastrous presidency of Willard “Mitt” Romney. Other than being wrong on pretty much everything, remember that Romney was the guy who actually MOCKED the concept of trying to save our planet from ruinous global warming. That alone should have disqualified him, and the fact that it didn’t says a LOT about humanity – nothing good. Meanwhile, I strongly urge President Obama to make his second term’s #1 focus stopping the “rising of the seas” – the very thing the utterly cynical, sociopathic Romney mocked – and kickstarting a clean energy revolution. There’s absolutely ZERO to waste.

*President Obama begins second term

*Senate Democrats to reopen tax battle GOP had hoped to lay to rest with ‘cliff’

*The second-term climate (“Straight talk is important. Policies to reduce emissions should not be justified with appeals to green jobs or energy independence. Americans should hear from their leaders about the risks the planet faces and why it makes sense to spend now to head off more costly consequences later.”)

*The liberation of Barack Obama

*Joe Biden to climate activists: ‘Keep the faith’ (“Vice President Joe Biden reassured environmentalists Sunday night that the Obama administration would not let climate change fall by the wayside in the president’s second term.”)

*A great man’s life of purpose (“[Martin Luther] King’s sermons and speeches – his words – guided generations. He was that rare American who moved this nation through the sheer force of his determination that we could be better than we are.”)

*Tim Kaine: Voters ‘expect’ action on guns

*Virginia Inaugural Ball: ‘You Can’t Help But Feel Optimistic’ (“An estimated 1,100 people attended the Virginia Inaugural Ball on Sunday at the Westin Arlington Gateway to celebrate the second inauguration of President Barack Obama – and gear up for key statewide elections in 2013.”)

*Photos: Virginia Inaugural Ball (Also, check out video of the speeches in my post below)

*GOP wants budget; Schumer warns they will get one (“We’re going to do a budget this year…it’s going to have revenues in it. And our Republican colleagues better get used to that fact.”)

*Concern over drones unites GOP and ACLU

*Virginia retailers give their 2 cents on plan to raise sales tax, ditch gas tax

*Sen. panel continues work on closing gun show loophole

*Arlington County gaining or losing residents? (“Demographers differ, while construction cranes dot the skyline.”)

*D.C. area forecast: Chilly inauguration weather, late flurries, then bitter cold midweek

Video: Virginia Inaugural Ball Speeches

7

I’ll post a lot more video tomorrow morning. For now, here’s Senator Mark Warner’s speech to the Virginia Inaugural Ball tonight in Arlington. Other speeches included DPVA Chair Charniele Herring, Rep. Bobby Scott, Rep. Gerry Connolly, Rep. Jim Moran, Senator Tim Kaine, and Terry McAuliffe. The place was packed tonight, by the way, well over 1,000 people…great times.

Boysko Ready To Wipe Out the “Rust” in Fairfax

0

I was really pleased to see that NLS has declared the 86th House of Delegates race between the presumed Democratic candidate Jennifer Boysko and Del. Tom Rust (R), “one of the marquee House of Delegates races in 2013.” Boysko has a primary opponent in Herbert Kemp, but she should easily win that one. The 86th District is one that Barack Obama carried by 61% of the vote. Tom Rust has managed to keep his seat mainly because of his having served as mayor of Herndon and by good constituent service, but NLS points out that Boysko’s service as Herndon aide to Fairfax Supervisor John Foust  will give her some real political strength in Rust’s Herndon stronghold.

I first met Jennifer Boysko during the Howard Dean campaign for president. Back then, she was a whirlwind of effective activity as the State Director for Dean’s campaign. I know that she will bring that same energy and political know how to her campaign for the House.

There are a couple of ways we progressives can assist Jennifer’s campaign. First, go to her website and check out the impressive list of endorsements she has. While you are there, take time to hit the “Contribute” button and add to her war chest. Also, go to the Democracy for America website and support Boysko’s endorsement by Democracy for America this year. DFA is a PAC that was formed out of the Howard Dean campaign for president.  Each year it endorses progressive candidates at all levels of government. That endorsement brings contributions and volunteer recruitment that often make the difference between success and failure. Candidates receive the endorsement based upon the grassroots support expressed on the DFA website.

The 86th is not the only Republican-held HofD district that Barack Obama and Tim Kaine easily carried. They should be the first districts where Democrats nominate first-tier candidates to take on incumbents.  In fact, if the Democrats ever have any hope of taking back the House, they will emulate what the Republicans did back when they were a “permanent minority” gerrymandered out of districts all over the state. They will run strong candidates in every district every election until they break through the gerrymandering. If the GOP can do it, so can we. We won’t become a majority this year, but eventually we will if we don’t give up.  

Thoughts on the Arlington Streetcar vs. BRT Debate

6

For over a decade now, Arlington has been discussing the possibility of building a streetcar line in the county. Back in July 2012, the County Board voted 4-0, with one abstention, “to approve the streetcar as the preferred transit option for Columbia Pike.” On December 11, 2012, the board approved, by a 4-1 vote, a PPTA (Virginia Public-Private Transportation Act of 1995) “allowing the county to enter into public-private partnerships for transportation projects like the planned Crystal City streetcar.” And in early January 2013, there was a report that a referendum might be required on the streetcar project, “if the government opts to sell ‘revenue bonds’ to fund part of the streetcar plan.” Meanwhile, “Arlington and Fairfax County officials currently are waiting on word from the federal government to see if they will receive up to $75 million in federal funds to support the streetcar project.”

Anyway, that’s mostly where we’re at right now: possibly in the home stretch of what has been a lengthy process, with the possibility of a streetcar system being built in Arlington…or not. It is in this context that I received notice the other day that a new group, Arlingtonians for Sensible Transit, had formed, with the goal of “offer[ing] as a viable alternative a modern regional bus rapid transit (BRT) system; request[ing] the County Board to undertake a cost-benefit analysis comparing BRT to a streetcar.” Given the group’s list of supporters, several of whom I know and respect, I was curious to learn more.

So, over the past few days, I’ve been speaking with supporters of the streetcar project, as well as proponents of BRT. My perspective on this issue comes overwhelmingly from my perspective a strong supporter of smart growth, high-density development, and public transit. In addition, of course, I’m a progressive, which means I believe in transparency and integrity in government, as well as the opportunity for citizens to have a voice in decisions affecting their lives. With regard to public transit, I’m open to all possibilities – light rail, heavy rail, buses of various types, pedestrian and cycling paths/trails/sidewalks/etc., you name it. I don’t believe there’s one solution that works everywhere, nor should there be a one-size-fits-all approach. For instance, I’m a big supporter of Metrorail, but I wasn’t fully convinced that extending Metro to Dulles Airport was the optimal use of scarce resources, and wondered whether other options – possibly including bus rapid transit – might not have been more cost effective.

Getting back to the issue at hand, let me lay out the main arguments I’m hearing from the two “sides” (in quotes because I don’t see either “side” as monolithic or absolutist) in this.

Pro-Streetcar/Anti-BRT Arguments

*The streetcar is by far the best option to move people in the Columbia Pike corridor. Right now, we’re pretty much at maximum capacity with regard to buses, can’t really add anymore. Also, given projected increases in the number of people needing public transit along the corridor – 30,000/day or more within the next 20 years – buses, even articulated buses, will simply be inadequate to meet that demand.

*The Pike Transit Initiative website makes the case that a streetcar system “[p]rovides an affordable and high-quality transit option;” “[i]ncreases transit ridership;” “[p]rovides the greatest transit capacity and the greatest capacity for future expansion;” “[s]ustains the economic vitality of the corridor and promotes community development;” “[i]mproves walkability and livability;” “[i]mproves access to regional transit, employment, and business centers;” “[d]ecreases vehicle miles traveled and emissions;” “[s]upports additional  housing as indicated in Arlington County’s Columbia Pike Neighborhoods Area Plan;” etc.

*Constraints in the corridor mean that any option – BRT or streetcar – will NOT have a dedicated Right of Way, but instead will run in regular lanes, along with regular traffic. This means that the “Rapid” part of BRT will not be the case, but that it will simply be “bus transit,” which we already have right now.

*When the streetcar is built, there will still be buses, making this an effective, robust, multi-layered system.

*Spending money on BRT would not make sense, given that it wouldn’t be rapid – because there’s no realistic way to get a dedicated “right of way” in that corridor – and also given the limits on bus capacity already seen in the corridor. Right now, buses are practically “bumping into each other” as it is. You have to deal with the needs of the corridor as it actually exists.

*Arlington has made plans to keep affordable housing in the corridor, in fact has gone above and beyond what almost any other jurisdiction has done in this regard, thus significantly reducing concerns about “gentrification.”

*Meanwhile, the streetcar would increase property values along the corridor, as well as result in a building boom, resulting in economic activity and tax revenues that would far MORE than pay for the streetcar.

*People who actually live in the corridor are supportive of the streetcar, with many annoyed at the opposition coming largely from people who live in other parts of Arlington.

*Funding would predominantly be through an extra-commercial add-on tax, which means that individuals won’t see their taxes go up. Also, businesses are not concerned about this add-on tax, and are very supportive of the streetcar.

*4 out of 5 County Board members think this is a good long-term vision for Arlington, will provide a strong return on investment, will improve the quality of life along the corridor, and will open up possibilities for further expansion of a streetcar network in the county and in the region, more broadly.

*There has been a recent streetcar success story in Virginia – The Tide light rail system in Norfolk, Virginia’s first such system, which opened for service on August 19, 2011, and which saw daily ridership exceeding projections to such an extent that it “reach[ed] its goal of 1 million rides 150 days earlier than had been projected.” Then, in November 2012, a referendum overwhelmingly approved a ballot question asking, “Should the Virginia Beach City Council adopt an ordinance approving the use of all reasonable efforts to support the financing and development of The Tide light rail into Virginia Beach?”

*There were people against the Orange Line coming into Arlington as well, back in the day. There are always people who oppose change and progress.

*If the ONLY thing you look at is the initial expenditure, perhaps you’ll opt to go with the cheaper project, but that’s often penny wise/pound foolish.

*A streetcar would be far more comfortable and appealing to potential riders than a bus.

*There would be only one power line running down the street, it would not be unsightly, and it provides much better power – faster/smoother acceleration, etc. – than a bus powered by natural gas or diesel.

Pro-BRT/Anti-Streetcar Arguments

*See Peter Rousselot’s report, “A Modern Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System is Far Superior to Streetcars in the Columbia Pike Corridor,” which lays out many of the pro-BRT arguments.

*One core argument made by the aforementioned study is that “Arlington could save between $100 million to $200 million by choosing the BRT option, and that no persuasive explanation has been offered to support paying this enormous premium for the streetcar option.”

*Peter Rousselot’s report also argues, “A modern BRT system could much more quickly be expanded to serve many more origins and destinations than those served by the currently-proposed, 5-mile streetcar system. Such an expanded BRT system would not require as many time-consuming transfers between transit modes. It would boost ridership and create a more economically efficient system.” Also, “a modern BRT system is the hands down winner in the thorough cost-benefit comparison that the Arlington County Board has not yet performed, but must perform before it makes a final decision on which of these two options actually should be funded.”

*”Even though the Columbia Pike streetcar proposal has been considered in one form or another for many years, the County Board has never had before it a proper cost-benefit comparison between the current streetcar proposal and a modern BRT system. Because such a proper cost-benefit comparison has never been performed, our many Arlington citizens groups and individual citizen activists have never had the opportunity to weigh in regarding such a comparison. The “Arlington Way” has not been followed with respect to the streetcar issue. The appropriate critical studies have not been done. Neither Arlington citizens nor Arlington businesses-which must pay for the streetcar-have been informed of the options available for the transit system they will fund.”

*BRT “can provide the same service frequency and span (time of day, days of week) service as the streetcar;” “would be more tailored to the market; e.g., it would provide a new express route which would be significantly faster than today’s bus service because it would have fewer stops, signal priority, and no-step, no gap boarding/alighting;” “would utilize high capacity, natural gas or hybrid diesel electric vehicles with low noise and emissions of all kinds; unlike the streetcar, no unsightly overhead wires would be required;” “would provide faster and more reliable speeds than streetcars because of the ability to go around stopped and/or turning cars and trucks;” “could much more quickly be expanded to serve many more origins and destinations than those served by the currently-proposed, 5-mile streetcar system.”

*At a time of budget constraints, as well as the need to fund a projected increase in student enrollment, Arlington needs to look at a less expensive option than the streetcar, especially one like the BRT which is superior for the reasons listed above.

*There should be a truly impartial study performed, perhaps by a university in the region, doing a side-by-side comparison of BRT vs. a streetcar in Arlington. Once that’s done, Arlingtonians can make a much more informed choice about which choice – BRT or a streetcar – would make the most sense.

My bottom line on all this? I am leaning heavily in favor of a streetcar, for all the reasons listed. I don’t see how Bus Rapid Transit is an appropriate option in lieu of a dedicated Right of Way that actually allows it to be rapid. I also believe that the economic benefits of building a streetcar system in Arlington would be far superior to a Bus (non)-Rapid Transit system. Having said all that, I’d be fully supportive and encouraging of having a truly independent study by transportation experts, perhaps at a local area university, analyzing the two options side by side. I don’t believe that either “side” should be involved in preparing such a study, or in influencing its outcomes. However, I DO believe that such a study should look broadly at the question, including economic benefits, costs, applicability to the corridor(s) in question, etc. Finally, I believe that if such a study is to be done, it needs to be soon, as this debate shouldn’t drag on for years. Having worked for 17 years at an independent, non-partisan, federal statistical and analytical agency (EIA), I can definitely attest to the benefits of having this type of analysis available to policymakers. If that’s possible in this case, I’m all for it. If not, though, it seems to me that for a wide variety of reasons, we should move ahead with the streetcar option as soon as funding is procured.  

Think Happy Thoughts: the Mental Aspects of Stemming Worst Effects of Climate Change

2

“We’ve now reached the point where mankind is controlling the climate of the planet,” said senior NASA scientist Bruce Wielicki at the Langley Research Center in Hamtpon, Virginia. Wielicki’s quote reads like a line from a science fiction movie, one that doesn’t end well for the human race.

Wielicki’s comment came in response to the recently released National Climate Assessment (NCA) report outlining, among other things, some of the negative consequences for Virginia, including: disease; more soaking rains; droughts; floods; stronger hurricanes; warmer temperatures and the risk for greater mental health related incidents. If you’re not depressed by now, you should be.

The NCA report also stated unequivocally what many of us already suspected: the effects of climate change are NOT distant threats, they’re here now and they’re effecting us now.

A quick look at the Natural Resources Defense Council’s “Extreme Weather Map 2012” shows in unmistakable detail the toll that climate change has taken on America. And of course, this could be just the beginning of a beautifully horrific narrative of extreme weather event after extreme weather event ravaging America.

I don’t know what words, statistics, graphs, personal stories, or rhetorical devices I can use to make more Americans aware of the urgent necessity to act to mitigate the worst effects of climate change now. I have seen, heard, and undertaken just about everything there is to push more folks into the “do something now camp” with only mixed

success.

Ultimately, however, our attitudes and our actions as individuals are what we have to rely on to make changes that will positively impact climate change. Ultimately, how we feel, discuss, and act on climate change will affect how others perceive climate change and our ability as individuals and a society to stop its worst effects.

This is all to say that the doom and gloom messaging is an important messaging tool to spur individual action (it’s the truth, after all), but it must be accompanied by positive thoughts, words, and actions. WE CAN come together as a society to make the necessary changes to reduce our negative impacts on the climate. WE CAN live our everyday lives in a manner that will help stem the worst effects of climate change. WE CAN stem the worst effects of climate change. WE CAN!

Virginia News Headlines: Sunday Morning

9

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Sunday, January 20.

*A new term, a new Obama

*Obama and Biden to be officially sworn in today

*Editorial: Make some history, Mr. President (“As President Obama enters his second term, hope remains he’ll work with Congress on historic changes.”)

*N. Virginia campaign volunteers urge Obama to be bold in 2nd term (Agreed. And the #1 thing to be bold on is combating global warming – the greatest threat, by far and away, to our planet, our species, and every other species on Earth.)

*5 People Shot At 3 Different Gun Shows On Gun Appreciation Day (Brilliant, huh?)

*Editorial: The power of the ballot box (“Martin Luther King Jr.’s words are a reminder that voter suppression efforts remain a reality today.”)

*Ex-health director: Conscience, not politics, prompted resignation

*Jeff E. Schapiro: The incredible, shrinking Va. Republican vote

*Most of governor hopefuls’ money is raised in Va.

*Va. campaign volunteers have advice for Obama: Be bold in second term

*Overhaul is probably just starting on Va. transportation funding

*Could McDonnell’s transportation plan be any worse?

*No tax on gasoline not good policy

*When a Debt to Society Has Been Paid in Full

*Once again, General Assembly debates how to fund transportation needs

*Oil, gas drilling sparks hope, concern in Virginia’s coastal plain

*Razing the reasons to privatize port

*Savings from axing Virginia gas tax won’t all go to drivers, expert says

*Western Virginia will be well represented at inauguration

*Virginia lawmaker wants to let students sleep in

*Capitals drop opener to Tampa Bay (“Washington unveils an attacking offense but appears far from mastering new coach’s system.”)

*Earl Weaver: Words from a master

Video: Bo Obama’s Inauguration Party

0



Yes, it’s long past time to put solar panels on the White House roof. Remember, President Obama’s administration itself promised back in October 2010 to do this. As Energy Secretary Chu said at the time, “This project reflects President Obama’s strong commitment to U.S. leadership in solar energy and the jobs it will create here at home…Deploying solar energy technologies across the country will help America lead the global economy for years to come.” I couldn’t agree more. So what are you guys waiting for? Does Bo have to install the solar panels himself or what? 🙂

Website Publishes Handy List of Arlingtonians Who Think They’re Smarter Than You

0

There is nothing that makes me want to throw myself into the furnace of a coal-fired power plant like

http://www.piketransit.com/abo…

http://greatergreaterwashingto…

1) The Arlington County Board doesn’t care about Columbia Pike

2) The Arlington County Board should stop trying to invest $250 million in a Columbia Pike Streetcar

“Over the past few months, I have been participating in meetings, reading, researching, and listening.”

Interview with Virginia Democratic LG Candidate Aneesh Chopra

2

Yesterday afternoon, I sat down for an on-the-record interview with Virginia Democratic Lieutenant Governor candidate Aneesh Chopra at his offices near Ballston Metro in Arlington. We spent about an hour talking, and were able to cover a significant amount of ground. Of course, given that the Virginia LG presides over the Senate, which deals with basically every issue facing our state, there’s no way we could cover it all – or even close – in an hour, or even 2 or 3 hours. Still, I thought it was productive, informative, and enjoyable. Here are my questions and Aneesh’s answers, summarized for brevity.

Question #1. What are the main issues you’ll be focusing on in your campaign? Will your focus mainly be on technology issues, which you’re known for, or will you broaden out to the wider range of issues that Virginians care about, and that the LG deals with (which is pretty much every issue)?

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): Aneesh believes we’re at a crossroads in Virginia. We’ve been the best managed state, the best state for business, the best state to raise a family, etc. But, in Aneesh’s view, over the last couple years, the General Assembly and the governor have taken us down a very wrong path…their agenda is not the right agenda for Virginia. What that’s done is taken our eye off the ball on the key challenges we face as a commonwealth. Aneesh believes that over the next 4-5 years, we’re going to make a decision on whether we’re going to be successful as a commonwealth for the next 40 years.

Aneesh sees three things that are top priorities for Virginia and top themes for his campaign: 1) the foundation of the economy is the education of the workforce – we’ve got to boost the number of graduates in Virginia over the next 5 years; 2) over 10% of the economy in Virginia is tied to federal spending, but we’re entering a period in which the likelihood of growth is less – we have to compensate for this by growing our own economy – small businesses in particular – here in Virginia (right now, we’re not in the top 20 states for entrepreneurship); 3) we’ve got to stop in its tracks the divisive agenda that has taken us off the ball.

On these three issues, Aneesh believes the lieutenant governor can play a significant role across the board. The 21st vote is critical. The LG also needs to use all the parliamentary tactics of being the presiding officer of the Senate in order to avoid the type of radical agenda we’ve seen the past few years. A proactive agenda of addressing education and diversifying the economy can be addressed/advanced by the lieutenant governor in a convening role (the LG serves on the Council on Virginia’s Future).

Question #2: I asked Aneesh about whether he thinks Democrats have gotten off to a slower start this cycle than Republicans. I also asked him when he expected to have a full website up and running.  

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): On the website issue, Aneesh said his focus in 2012 was exclusively on helping Tim Kaine and Barack Obama win their elections. Now, he has a full campaign team and expects to be fully up and running shortly.

On the issue of whether Democrats are off to a slower start than Republican, Aneesh said that it’s fairly common for Virginia statewide elections not to gear up until after the presidential elections. Aneesh did acknowledge that Republicans have been out there early, and he pointed out that this, combined with opting for a nominating convention, has helped push their field to the right (e.g., on the “personhood” amendment). In addition, Aneesh pointed out that all of the Republican candidates have signed off on the “radical Republican agenda.” “When CEO friends of mine who are not that political reach out to me and say, my own employees are asking me if they’re going to be legally entitled to contraception in Virginia…that’s when you’ve crossed over; these divisive issues, it is outrageous.” In Aneesh’s view, “Governor Kaine said it best: we are successful in the commonwealth because we are a talent economy.” Aneesh says he fully embraces that spirit; “you don’t compete in a global economy with three quarters of your capacity tied behind your back, if you alienate women…minorities…the LGBT community, this is not a winning formula to move the commonwealth forward…we’re competing in a global economy.”

Question #3: I asked Aneesh about the strategy of Virginia using tax dollars to bid against other states to lure companies to Virginia.

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): His focus is on growing more new (e.g., less than 5 years old) companies in Virginia and increasing their success. By being better at helping entrepreneurs, Aneesh believes “we can generate 100,000 net new jobs from small businesses and new businesses…that is a clear opportunity for Virginia and I look forward to leading in that effort.” He says he’d focus his personal time and attention in growing new businesses in Virginia. Three particularly promising sectors, in Aneesh’s view, are health care (e.g., Evolent), energy (e.g., OPower), and education.

Question #4: Why should Democrats vote for you over your opponent, Sen. Ralph Northam? Do you have any major policy differences, is there an electability argument, or what?

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): He has “a very clear message to Virginia about the choices we face and the crossroads we’re at, the opportunities I see the lieutenant governor taking.” “It’s up to my opponent to share what his vision is. We’ll both present our visions, it will be up to the primary voters to decide…We have a very strong message to share, an important one that is crucial to the future of the commonwealth, and that I believe Virginians will respond to.”

Question #5: I asked Aneesh about the importance of diversity – geographic, gender, ethnic, racial, etc. – on the Democratic ticket.

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): “Diversity is important for the country.” Aneesh noted that he was named by Governor Kaine as the first Indian-American member of the cabinet, and that he also recruited Vivek Kundra as Virginia’s Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Technology. According to Aneesh, Governor Kaine thanked him for opening up new channels for candidates to come forward that [Kaine] might not otherwise have known about. In Aneesh’s opinion, Kundra was phenomenal, went on to be the nation’s first Chief Information Officer. This is an example of why diversity matters, and why opening up opportunity for all the talent in the commonwealth is critical. Generally speaking, Aneesh noted that he’d “love more women, minorities, candidates from every corner of the commonwealth, to run for office in Virginia, but we are we are”…[with] the candidates who have stepped up.

According to Aneesh, to be able to win this election, “the formula is clear” – we need to turn out the coalition that came out for President Obama and Tim Kaine in 2012. In 2013, we need to turn out younger voters, minorities, less political people (entrepreneurs, business community). Aneesh believes he has a very strong connection to those communities. Also, there’s clearly a novelty to being the first Asian American on a statewide ticket in Virginia. People need to see a candidate who reflects their values, and Aneesh says, “I reflect the values of the 2012 coalition that reelected President Obama.” You also need to have the resources to communicate with people. It’s also about smarter campaigning, as we did in 2012. The most important factor: do Virginians see in a candidate someone who shares their values? “I strongly believe the values and priorities I’ve shared are critical to Virginia’s future.”

Also of interest, Aneesh said he fully agreed with my analysis that the supposed “rule” that Virginia always votes opposite for governor of the party in the White House is meaningless.

Question #6: I asked about the hostility towards government by Ken Cuccinelli and other Republicans, and also more broadly about his philosophy – ideology, pragmatism, or what?

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): “My view is that Democratic values must be advanced, and if we can’t expand budgets and if we can’t pass progressive legislation, we’re going to have to open up a new front to advance our values, and that front I believe is innovation. Innovation says we can build a more equitable education system that closes the achievement gap, we can build a more affordable and accessible health care system, we can transition to a renewable energy system, that’s in our capacity to do.”

Aneesh considers himself a Mark Warner/Tim Kaine Democrat, noting that “this pragmatic ideology is not something I’ve just been thinking about and talking about, this is what I’ve done in the 6 years I’ve been in public life…You experiment, you try, you learn, you try again” Aneesh says that he might adjust Bill Clinton’s statement that the era of big government is over. In Aneesh’s view, it’s not an argument about size, about big or small, it’s about a smarter government that actually works…”you’ve got a problem, you can fix it. Government in many ways is the ultimate in convening power; we together can make better choices that advance these core values” (this is summed up in the Strategy for American Innovation).

Question #7: I asked Aneesh specifically about Ken Cuccinelli and his extremist ideology, where that virulent anti-government belief system comes from.

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): “It’s always struck me as odd; if you’re hostile to government, why do you want to serve in it? It also conveys a message to everybody that works for you that you just don’t care…President Obama in his first month or two issued a memorandum on scientific integrity, putting into practice a commonsense principle that we treat science with respect, and to watch what Cuccinelli did against UVA…objectively speaking, to have an elected Attorney General go after the state’s arguably flagship institution, amongst the country’s crown jewels for research and insight and knowledge on a charge of fraud, it was disheartening to say the least, and absolutely the wrong thing for Virginia. I hope Virginians will reject such action when they make their choice for governor this year…[Cuccinelli’s attack on UVA and science] is absolutely abhorrent, that does not reflect my personal values or Virginia’s values. But it’s more than that, it’s also the nature of how he used his office: he highly politicized an office that is supposed to work protecting consumers, it’s supposed to go after basic matters of law, and that’s not what he chose to do.”

Question #8: I asked Aneesh about 20 or so important pieces of legislation before this year’s Virginia General Assembly, and asked him to tell me how he would vote, “yea” or “nay,” on each. What I found most impressive here was that Aneesh – who isn’t a member of the General Assembly – was familiar with every bill I mentioned, didn’t even need me to read a full description before he answered immediately “yea” or “nay.”

1. Bob McDonnell’s transportation legislation. NO

2. Deeds bill: “Requires a background check for any firearm purchase.” YES

3. Janet Howell bill: “Elections; absentee voting. Provides that qualified voters may vote absentee in person without providing an excuse or reason.”OVERWHELMINGLY YES

4. Mark Herring (SB 1084): “Health insurance; authorizes SCC to establish state plan management partnership exchange.” YES!

5. Mark Herring: “Classification as hospitals of certain facilities in which abortions are performed. Eliminates language classifying facilities in which five or more first trimester abortions per month are performed as hospitals for the purpose of compliance with regulations of the Board of Health…” YES!

6. Donald McEachin: “Constitutional amendment (first resolution); restoration of voting rights. Provides for the automatic restoration of voting rights to persons convicted of nonviolent felonies…” YES!

7. Chap Petersen: “Renewable energy facilities; eligibility for incentives. Establishes a requirement that electricity generated from renewable sources be generated from a facility located in the Commonwealth…” YES!

8. Donald McEachin: “Nondiscrimination in state employment. Prohibits discrimination in state employment based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, age, marital status, disability, sexual orientation, or status as a special disabled veteran…” YES!

9. Ralph Northam: “Study; mandatory renewable energy portfolio standard program; YES…”

10. Ralph Northam: ” Ultrasound prior to abortion. Removes the requirement that a woman undergo a transabdominal ultrasound prior to an abortion.” YES!

11. Mamie Locke: “Payday lending. Repeals provisions authorizing payday lending in the Commonwealth.” YES!

12. John Miller: “Virginia Redistricting Commission created. Establishes a five-member commission to prepare redistricting plans for the House of Delegates, state Senate, and congressional districts. Appointments to the Commission shall be made one each by the four majority and minority party leaders of the House and Senate.” YES!

13. Thomas Garrett: “Nonpublic school students; participation in interscholastic programs. Prohibits public schools from joining an organization governing interscholastic programs that does not deem eligible for participation a student who (i) is receiving home instruction or is attending a private school that does not offer the interscholastic program in which the student wishes to participate” (Tebow bill) NO

14. Charles Carrico: ” Constitutional amendment (first resolution); freedom of speech. Expands the freedom of speech provisions of the Constitution of Virginia to permit prayer and the recognition of religious beliefs, heritage, and traditions on public property, including public school property.” NO

15. Charles Carrico: “Substance abuse screening and assessment of public assistance applicants and recipients. Requires local departments of social services to screen each Virginia Initiative for Employment Not Welfare (VIEW) program participant to determine whether probable cause exists to believe the participant is engaged in the use of illegal substances.” NO

16. Chap Petersen: “Constitutional amendment (first resolution); tax credits. Provides that no tax credit shall remain in effect longer than five years unless it is reenacted by the General Assembly.” YES

17. Barbara Comstock: “Right to vote by secret ballot on labor organization representation. Declares that, in any procedure providing for the designation, selection, or authorization of a labor organization to represent employees, the right of an individual employee to vote by secret ballot is a fundamental right that shall be guaranteed from infringement.” NO

18. Mark Cole: “Elections; polling place procedures; voter identification requirements. Removes several items from the list of acceptable identification documents that a voter must present when voting at the polls on election day: a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, or paycheck that shows the name and address of the voter.” NO

Aneesh added three more bills he strongly supports: HB 1872 (jump starting the crowd funding industry in Virginia); HB 1873 (codifying that patients are entitled to electronic copies of their own health care data); HB 1935 (authorizing Virginia to establish a self-employment assistance program).

Question #9: I asked Aneesh if he was basically a nonpartisan figure, got a very strong answer which I tried to quote exactly.

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): “I am a Democrat. President Lyndon Johnson allowed people of my skin color to immigrate to the United States. I will for the rest of my life be a Democrat. It is in my blood. I would not exist if President Johnson had not taken the courageous choices that he did. My core Democratic values are rock [solid] on the notion that we lift the next generation up, my kids should live a better life than me, period end of story. I strongly believe a stronger, more effective government will make that happen. This is not a lack of ideology, this is opening up a new front for Democrats who have held these beliefs for so long to see them realized.” [We then got into a discussion about Aneeh’s work, including with Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, on pushing for equality in pay for women in part by increasing access to data and information.]

Question #10: I asked Aneesh about his $1,000 contribution to Bobby Jindal in 2004.

Aneesh Chopra’s answer (condensed): Jindal “moved to the DC area as an assistant secretary for health, we shared a professional interest and we became social friends, he wasn’t a candidate at the time, we were just friends. When he chose to run for office, he asked for my help, I provided him some support…he is a friend who asked, but obviously I don’t support the agenda he’s carried through in Louisiana, and I haven’t given him any money since.”

Finally, we chatted a bit more about Ken Cuccinelli. I mentioned to Aneesh that Cuccinelli was coming out with a book, and Aneesh said so was he (on how to achieve a smarter government). I noted that Cuccinelli’s book was on how government was evil, liberals are evil, etc, and Aneesh said that will be “a wonderful contrast.” Aneesh noted that not all Republicans are extreme, such as former Kaine administration Secretary of Natural Resources Preston Bryant, a Republican who led the effort to preserver 400,000 acres of land in Virginia.

Aneesh concluded by saying he had a great deal of confidence in the 2013 Democratic ticket, and also that the 2012 Obama coalition will react very favorably to our agenda and we’ll see a very different electoral map from 2009.

P.S. If you’re interested, check out Chopra’s Facebook page and Twitter feed, as well as his Tumblr blog.  

Virginia News Headlines: Saturday Morning

1

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, January 19.

*House GOP backs down, plans vote to raise debt limit for three months

*Why Republicans caved on the debt ceiling (To quote the top-ranked comment on this article, “I see. They’d let the country run for three months, so they can hurt it more later? Way to go!”)

*GOP plan may be unconstitutional (Niiiice.)

*Dem lawmakers call on Cuccinelli to give up AG post while running for governor

*Virginia Republicans Work To Implement Obamacare, Despite GOP Governor’s Opposition To Reform

*Inaction on online sales-tax law hamstrings McDonnell’s roads vision (“Of the $3.2 billion the governor says his plan will raise, a third would come from taxing online sales from out-of-state vendors. But no such federal law has even been introduced.”)

*Business tax breaks shouldn’t be forever (This one’s a no brainer. Unless there’s a damn good reason for doling out our tax money to corporations as welfare, we shouldn’t be doing it.)

*Virginia’s jobless rate in December is lowest in four years (No thanks to Bob McDonnell, Eric Can’tor, etc.)

*Yost urges House to focus on mental health

*Goodlatte calls on Putin to allow pending adoptions (For once I agree with Goodlatte…probably the last time.)

*Updated: Senate committee advances, then reconsiders bill requiring criminal checks at gun shows

*Morrissey borrowed guns, alerted Capitol Police

*Fractious Va. House applauds a soothing prayer

*U.Va. student council urges legislators to block Dragas (The opponents of Dragas haven’t been particularly proactive about this, while her backers have been VERY active behind the scenes. The result? Her likely reappointment…)

*The Case For Transportation User Fees (“The solution is for all transportation modes to absorb their full costs so society can make rational choices, not to make the true costs opaque for everybody.”)

*State seeks more control over Virginia Railway Express

*Video: Washington Examiner’s Steve Contorno on the Virginia legislature

*Big field set in Va. GOP races (“GOP convention will pick nominees”)

*Lance Armstrong’s confession without contrition (The guy’s a sociopath.)

*Snowstorm blankets southwest Va., KOs power