Home Blog Page 3206

Get On the Bus for Kai Degner

1

Del. Scott Surovell forwarded me the following email.  Several Democratic committees – Arlington, Fairfax, Prince William, Loudoun, Alexandria, and the DPVA – are organizing this, join them if you can and help Kai Degner win this election on June 15!

On Saturday, June 12, you have the opportunity to help start to win back control of the House of Delegates.  The Democratic Party of Virginia and House Democratic Caucus have hired a bus to ship campaign volunteers to Harrisonburg to help Get Out The Vote for our candidate, Harrisonburg Mayor Kai Degner who is running in a June 15 special election to replace Matt Lohr, a Republican in the House of Delegates who resigned to take a government appointment.  Click here to read more about Kai Degner’s campaign.

Kai is a twenty-nine year old ball of fire who door knocked his way onto the Harrisonburg City Council and subsequently was elected Mayor.  There are many votes to get out in his base in the City of Harrisonburg.  Additionally, a third party “tea party” candidate has filed to run which will divide up Kai’s opponent’s base of support.  This race represents an excellent opportunity to take back a seat if we can focus our statewide resources for one weekend.

The bus will leave on Saturday, June 12 at 9 A.M., from Fairfax County Democratic Committee Headquarters, 2815 Hartland Rd, Falls Church, and will return at 7 p.m. to the same location.  Just enough time for 6 hours of good grassroots door knocking.

There are 55 spots available and we need to fill every one of them!

CLICK HERE TO RESERVE YOUR SEAT ON THE BUS

If you are unhappy about the direction that Bob McDonnell and Ken Cuccinelli have taken our Commonwealth, this is the perfect opportunity to send a message.  Kai is a great candidate and has his opponents are on the defensive.  Our chances are good for an upset victory by Kai.  We’ve had a great track record in special elections, both here in Virginia and nationally.  Let’s keep it up and keep moving towards a Democratic House of Delegates!

Why the Tea Party Will Fail (the Jihadists, too)

6

We are in for a few rough election cycles as the Tea Party’s rightwing populism burns through the electorate. Cynical outside observers have spied a certain irony, or, if you prefer, hypocrisy, in “the movement” because so much of its funding appears to be flowing through subterranean channels from the well-stuffed coffers of mega-corporations and other Big Money citadels.  

Even if you follow the money, there is, however, a genuine underpinning of honest anger among the TP foot soldiers against what they see as bloated government that answers to greedy and cruel big business, which has put our grandchildren in hock with its huge budget deficits—– a cause that also acts as a cover for both middle-aged white fear of loss of power in an increasingly diverse electorate, and covert racism, as explained in

The Stalking Horse.

The same outside observers maintain, I believe with some reason, that Big Business interests have co-opted the Tea Party for their own purposes, with the intent of furthering the transition to a corporate feudalism which will keep the facade of a democratic republic while true political power resides with global corporate interests. A current example of corporate power has been on display with the Big Bank bailouts, dilution of re-regulation efforts, and even the arrogance of BP in the Gulf, ignoring EPA directives on use of dispersants, and preventing full on-the-ground coverage by press and other media of the Deepwater oil spill catastrophe.  

Alas, Tea Party, you are doomed. Yes, you are probably more than a flash in the pan, but still doomed as a long-term successful political movement, and not because of anything or everything you will do over the coming months, or what your Democratic opponents might screw up their courage to do, either.

The reason your movement will finally fall to the wayside is that you are mired in the past, and the future is roaring down on you, inevitably, inexorably, and quite beyond your power to manage.

Everything about the Tea Party hinges on “restoration,” a turn backward to what they have chosen to define as “the original Constitution,” an infallible document crafted by our all-wise Founding Fathers. They mean the Constitution as strictly interpreted in conformity with their personal idea of what was meant by each and every word. That turns out to mean they are big on states’ rights, a severely limited national government, a social system favoring the originators of the Revolution (i.e., whites, especially males), and a  political system catering to business or what they call free enterprise. It is all about turning back the clock to a mythical period of time that conforms to their comfort level—- as encouraged, of course, by big business interests, which chafe under regulation by an uppity federal government that has sometimes proved hard to control, interests which have very different objectives from the stated goals of the Tea Party.

The World Future Society, a 40-year old organization of futurists, says in a special report,

“It’s as if we’re driving 200 miles an hour and only looking into the rear-view mirror.”

That is a perfect description of the Tea Party, whose members have been heard to say “I don’t like change.” Too bad, TP, life is change. In the 21st century, we are dealing with hyper-change, and the most valuable skill required is foresight…. a skill completely unavailable if you are looking in a rear-view mirror.

The Society has been remarkably successful over the past 40 years in forecasting major technological and social developments—- not the details, but the broad-brush trends, from the 1970’s energy crisis to increasing terrorist attacks on US soil, even mentioning the World Trade Center as a likely target, as well as human organ transplants, genetic engineering, new communications technologies, and  telecommuting, among other developments. There are at least 17 trends and breakthroughs that have significant entrepreneurial significance, spotted by them just for the time frame of 2011 through 2025:

1- Water will become the new oil (I say the American Southwest is already desperate for water, and the wars of the 21st century will more likely be over access to water, than oil); use of desalinization will grow

2- WIMAX will create countrywide wireless

3- By 2025 world-wide life span will increase one year per year; only 15 percent of deaths will be due to naturally occurring infectious diseases Think what this will mean: vast aging populations, for example)

4- There will be a race for genetic enhancements comparable to the space race in the 20th century; this includes nano- and bio-technologies unimaginable just a few years ago, including boosted intelligence

5- Bioviolence will be a greater threat; previously cutting-edge technologies will be readily available to almost anyone, including nuts and fanatics

6- Artificial intelligence as early as 2023 will enable computers to learn and think, for example to help a car navigate through traffic or diagnose complex illnesses

7- Algae will have a huge potential as a biofuel, especially for transportation; it can produce 5,000 gallons of fuel per acre, meeting 30-60 percent of US oil needs at perhaps $30 a barrel, by 2020

8- Invention will become automated as inventors write descriptions of the problems to be solved, and turn the descriptions over to computers, enabling non-technical people to become inventors

9- Even oil extraction will be improved as old wells are returned to production with new technology (this is already well underway)

10- Nanotechnology, manipulating matter at nanoscale, will create much less expensive diamonds and other precious commodities (also already well underway)

11- Consumers themselves will take an active role in inventing new products and services (see #8)

12- Electric cars will become fully practical by 2020, which will also help to “neutralize petrodollar power”

13- The Millennial Generation will become the next “Great Generation” because they have a strong entrepreneurial bent, preferring to run their own small business than work for a mega-corporation

14- Quantum computers will revolutionize information around 2021, completing in seconds tasks that silicon computers would need billions of years to accomplish (we have seen algorithms on computers already creating unusual volatility in stock markets, beyond present regulations to control, think what it will be with qubits)

15- Solar energy output could double, thanks to advances in photovoltaics, making solar electricity much more competitive, perhaps within just 3 years

16- Genetic research may soon conquer most inherited diseases, as personal DNA can be replaced or even over-written

17- Virtual education will be mainstream by 2015, especially in corporate training

Not one of these trends can be accommodated within the current Tea Party dogma. What, for example, would their religious quadrant make of #16, meddling with God’s creation? They can frustrate and delay America’s participation in this wave of the future, by, perhaps, preventing federal subsidies that encourage such developments as using algae as a biofuel, while the rest of the world charges ahead.  This can make the US less competitive, turning us into a backwater, a 21st century version of a third world country.

I believe it far more likely that the Tea Party, after a brief and riotous turn in the sun, will be overtaken by events. These trends, and others, will simply ride right over the Tea Party, making them supremely irrelevant. As the Millennials come into power (see #13), they will reject the retro TP and the Republican Party itself as presently constituted. They may even, of course, reject the Democratic Party if it fails to carpe diem and cast itself as the enabler of the future, not its opponent.

Oddly enough, the Islamic jihadists are in the same boat as the Tea Party: they reject the future, have their eyes fastened on a mythical ideal, and are equally mired in the past (just a slightly different past than that of the Tea Party Republicans). They, too, will largely be unable to hold back the future and, where they do rule for a time, their subjects will be completely left behind and will, eventually, dispose of them.

Rachel Maddow: That was then, this is then

1

(That was then, this is then, and that’s completely unacceptable! – promoted by lowkell)

Offshore DrillingFrom Virginia Beach Progressives

It’s no secret that I am opposed to new offshore drilling, especially off the coast of Virginia, and I do so on environmental and economic terms. I believe that we stand on the very edge of discovery and development of technologies that will allow us to not only kick our addiction to foreign oil, but carbon fuels altogether. The investment into new oil exploration is an investment not made into this new technology, and thus, is not an investment into the future energy independence and strength of our nation.

We are only now beginning to employ technologies that have been around for decades in our buildings and vehicles. We’re doing so, hopefully, because we see the change in the tide. However, we’ve seen this before, and have in the past reverted to old, outdated, and inefficient technology because it was easy and cheap. It is my hope that our trend toward energy efficiency and independence will not hampered by this sort of shortsightedness. Our failure to continue on this path will keep our nation from moving forward, beyond the woes of carbon fuels.

Rachel Maddow illustrated this clearly in comparing our current oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska to very similar disasters in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska in 1979. What’s clear is that in 31 years, nothing has changed about the way we respond to these major spills. We attempt and fail at using the same methods and technology to stop the leak and prevent the damage cause by the spewed oil. It took nine months for relief wells to be drilled to allow the well in the Gulf of Mexico to be capped in 1979. It’s only been five weeks since our current drilling nightmare began. The same methods have been applied to stop the leak now as was used in 1979. So far, we’re seeing the same results. We’ve seen the damage from just five weeks. Will it be another seven or eight months before we’re able to get the well capped? It’s scary.

Five Reasons Clean Energy Trumps Tea Party Slogans

Sometimes I think America is the proverbial child-star-gone-bad of nations: we have a crippling addiction, but we still won't go to rehab.

We are hooked on burning dirty fossil fuels like cavemen, and no matter how many times we hit rock bottom — deadly coal mining accidents, the uncontrolled oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and American soldiers risking their lives overseas — we won't embrace the safer, smarter, cleaner path of renewable energy.

Change shouldn't be this hard.

That is the message behind a new ad campaign launched by NRDC's Action Fund this week. The ad urges senators from both sides of the aisle to put America back in control of our energy future.

Americans want change: a recent poll found that seven in ten Americans think clean energy legislation must be fast-tracked in the wake of the catastrophic Gulf oil spill.

Yet our elected officials haven't delivered the clean energy that voters want. Too many lawmakers fear that if they vote for a clean energy future, they will fall prey to populist mood swings come November. But they are mistaken and here is why:

 

1. Support for clean energy and climate action is not a flash in the pan. President Obama made clean energy one of the three planks of his platform. His energy policies have been vetted, reviewed and fleshed out through the longest presidential campaign in history and into his administration.

And all the while, clean energy has remained popular with American voters. So much so that Tea Party candidates now talk about it themselves. Most of their claims are bogus, but it is revealing that they haven't left clean energy on the cutting room floor.

2. Tea Party candidates are like the streaker at a football game. They get a lot of attention for their bold, rebellious positions, but after you get a closer look, you want to turn your head away. Their catchphrases simply don't hold up to scrutiny, never mind a 24-hour news cycle.

Rand Paul sounded good in his 30-second campaign spots, for instance, but just days after he won the primary, he started sayingbusiness owners should be allowed to kick people of color out of their establishments. After seeing Paul on The Rachel Maddow Show or Sarah Palin being interviewed by Katie Couric, viewers start to realize that Tea Party slogans don't always make for sound governing policy.

3. The Tea Party is today's rebranding of conservative Republican voters. It baffles me that people talk about the Tea Party as if it were something new, when in fact it is just the latest packaging of the radical right. 
We have seen this before and we know how it ends: people who identify with the radical group of the day are people who already vote and who will continue to vote for the most conservative candidate. This is not a new batch of voters up for grabs, and therefore, there is no point in pandering to them.

4. Angry voters may scream the loudest, but that doesn't make them powerful. It is human nature to pay attention to the loudest person in the room, but that doesn't mean you have to like them. The official Tea Party page on Facebook has only 200,000 fans. The “Can this poodle wearing a tinfoil hat get more fans than Glenn Beck” Facebook page has 280,453 fans.

Right now, every politico is trying to figure out how to win in November, and some are getting distracted by the noise of the radical right. The truth is that these people have been angry for a long time and they will be angry long after lawmakers leave Congress. It is how they live their lives. And while they have extra visibility right now, it looks like most elections will be decided on issues particular to each state, not Tea Party anger.

5. People will vote for lawmakers who create jobs, growth and security. In the end, winning elections and governing the nation is about making people's lives better. Passing clean energy and climate legislation will do that. It could generate nearly 2 million jobs, put America at the forefront of the global clean energy marketplace, strengthen national security and reduce dangerous pollution.

Now is not the time to be bullied. It is the time for lawmakers to stand up and put America on a path to a cleaner, better future. This kind of change isn't hard at all.

VoteVets on Oil Spill: “America Needs a New Mission”

1



Another excellent ad by VoteVets.org. What about this clear, powerful message do opponents of clean energy and climate legislation fail to understand?

Del. Scott Surovell Named “Legislative Rookie of the Year” by VEA

3

Congratulations to Del. Scott Surovell (D-44th) and keep up the great work!

Delegate Scott Surovell was named a “Legislative Rookie of the Year” by the Virginia Education Association in recognition of his efforts to strengthen public education throughout the Commonwealth during the 2010 legislative session. “As a product of Fairfax County Public Schools, I am honored to be recognized by the VEA,” said Surovell. Surovell was one of six newly elected delegates to receive a 100% rating from the VEA.

The VEA, founded in 1863 comprises over 60,000 educators in Virginia. Dr. Kitty Boitnott, president of the VEA said of Surovell: “Delegate Surovell has begun his legislative career as a solid supporter of our public schools. We have acknowledged his 100% pro-education voting record by awarding him VEA’s Rookie of the Year award. We look forward to working with Delegate Surovell in the years ahead. He is a welcomed friend of public education.”

Surovell graduated from West Potomac High School in 1989, James Madison University in 1993, and the University of Virginia School of Law in 1996. He made public education one of the cornerstones of his 2009 campaign. “Education, from pre-K to graduate school, is a top priority in the Mount Vernon community and throughout the Commonwealth,” the Delegate noted. “Fairfax County public schools are one of the most effective economic development tools in our government’s toolkit. Strong schools mean good jobs, a strong economy and a better way of life for area residents.”

Surovell was one of several legislators who took the lead in maintaining state funding for public school systems throughout Northern Virginia. “While the Local Composite Index is a flawed set of rules, we have used it to allocate school funding for years,” Surovell said. “We can’t abandon it when it produces a result that some members of the legislature don’t like.”

Looking ahead, Surovell stated, “I appreciate the work the VEA does for students and teachers throughout the Commonwealth. I look forward to working alongside them as we defend and improve Virginia’s reputation for educational excellence.” Surovell is currently examining means to increase preschool access in Mount Vernon and along the Route 1 corridor.

House Votes to Repeal “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”

4

Last night, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to repeal the egregious, immoral, outdated, self-defeating, wildly unpopular policy known as “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.”  The vote on Patrick Murphy’s amendment was 234-194, with the Virginia delegation breakout is as follows:

Yes on Repealing DADT

Gerry Connolly

Jim Moran

Glenn Nye

Tom Perriello

Bobby Scott

No on Repealing DADT

Rick Boucher

Eric Cantor

Randy Forbes

Bob Goodlatte

Rob Wittman

Frank Wolf

Sadly, it’s not surprising that almost every Republican – aka, “the party of no” – voted against this long-overdue anti-discrimination amendment.  Fortunately, Democrats control Congress and the White House, so this will almost certainly become law, but no thanks to the “red team.”  Oh, and note the Republican “moderate” who voted to continue discrimination against gays and lesbians in our military? That’s right, our pal Frank Wolf, who hasn’t been a real “moderate” in many years, even though a lot of people in the 10th CD continue to think he is.

P.S. Thanks to the 5 Virginia Democrats who voted to repeal DADT!

UPDATE: Also, the Senate Armed Services Committee voted 16-12 to end DADT. The only Republican voting “yes” was Susan Collins of Maine. The only Democrat voting “no” was our own Jim Webb.  His statement – which, needless to say, I do not agree with – is after the “fold.”

Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen have both stated that military men and women in all services and at all levels should be engaged as the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy is reviewed.  For this reason, in February DOD instituted a comprehensive review process that they viewed to be important in their roles as the senior leaders of the Department of Defense.  The Obama Administration agreed with the importance of this process in its letter of May 24, stating that “ideally the Department of Defense Comprehensive Review… would be completed before the Congress takes any legislative action.”

DOD reaffirmed this position in a statement on May 25: ‘Secretary Gates continues to believe that ideally the DOD review should be completed before there is any legislation to repeal the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell law…’ The chiefs of all four military services also concur in this view.

I agree with this viewpoint.  I have met personally with the officials in charge of this review, and communicated my own observations regarding the comprehensive survey that will be a part of this review.  I see no reason to pre-empt the process that our senior Defense Department leaders put into motion, and I am concerned that many members of the military would view such a move as disrespectful to the importance of their roles in this process.