Home Blog Page 3219

Is the Republican Party ready for this kind of extremism?

0

Imagine this: A man wants to run for President on the Republican line. But he calls himself an “Independent Republican”. And he's gay and opposed Prop 8. Oh, and this is his platform:

# I will work hard to end to Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

# Pass the federal Employment Anti-Discrimination law (ENDA)

# Eliminate the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)

 

 

Interestingly, enough, this is Fred Karger, and the more I look at him the more he appears as a competant, qualified candidate than some fringe. Here is an unapologetic Moderate Republican who got his political starts volunteering for Gov. Nelson Rockefeller, and worked as a strategist for the campaigns of Bob Dole and George H. W. Bush. He was a partner in Dolphin Group, and battled Propoisiton  fiercly in 2008. 

Judging by the reaction of Iowa Republican National Committeeman Steve Scheffler (also head of the Iowa Christian Alliance), Mr. Karger seems to be getting a lot of attention. Scheffler is quoted as telling Karger: “I will work overtime to help ensure that your political aspirations are aborted right here in Iowa.” That is harsh rhetoric towards a candidate with zero chance of winning like Mr. Karger, but seems appropriate judging by the hostile nature of the current Republican Party towards fellows like Mr. Karger.

It remains to be seen if Mr. Karger will have any impact at all on the 2012 race, but he would certainly liven up a primary debate. 

Robert Hurt: Coward, Whiner

3

First, the “coward” part.



Now, the “whiner” part.

Quick, somebody call the waaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance for Robert Hurt!  Of course, it’s possible that  the reason he’s so afraid of public and/or unscripted events and tough questions is because his political views are in such stark opposition to the best interests of his constituents.  Either that, or he’s just a coward and a whiner. Or both.  Anyway, you decide.  

Al Gore: Patrick Murray Favors “more drilling and more carbon pollution”

30



At a fundraiser this past weekend, Al Gore praises Jim Moran as “prescient” on offshore oil drilling and a “leader” on other environmental issues. In contrast, Gore points out, Moran’s opponent (Patrick Murray) believes in “more fossil fuels…more drilling…more carbon pollution.”  Tough choice, huh?

P.S. Great job by Patrick Murray’s “Social Media Director” for shooting this video that’s so helpful to…Jim Moran! Ha. 😉

UPDATE: The video was posted by the Murray campaign (by their “Social Media director”) then taken down in an apparent panic after we posted it here at Blue Virginia.  Fortunately, through the wonders of the internets, it’s now back by popular demand. Enjoy! 🙂

UPDATE #2: I hear that Jim Moran is receiving the endorsement of the Veterans of Foreign Wars Political Action Committee.  Patrick “I’m a veteran and that’s my only qualification for higher office” Murray is going to be piiiiiiiiiiiissed! 🙂

Loan Sharking: Alive and Well in Virginia

5



Well, well, well. We are supposed to feel really good because on October 1 Virginia is finally going to “regulate” car title lenders, those leeches who give some poor guy down on his luck money in return for the title to his vehicle, which they can then repossess and sell at auction when the poor guy can’t pay the exorbitant interest rate charged on the loan. To call the law that passed in Virginia regulation is a joke. There is absolutely nothing in it for the lenders to worry about. Why should there be? They helped write it, but more on that later.

The bill introduced by Dick Saslaw (D-Springfield) to regulate car title loans still means that companies in that sleazy business can charge interest of 22% per month on the outstanding balance of a loan for $700 or less. Plus, the law puts no cap on the size of the loans. Lenders are at least barred from continuing to charge interest on a loan after they repossess a vehicle or going to court to seek a “deficiency judgment” after they take someone’s vehicle and sell it.

According to Richmond Sunlight,  

Under this measure, if the loan balance is not paid in full within a 25-day grace period (in which case interest does not accrue), interest shall not exceed 22 percent per month on the portion of the outstanding balance of the loan that does not exceed $700; 18 percent per month on the portion between $700 and $1,400; and 15 percent per month on the portion that exceeds $1,400. There is no cap on the size of such loans. Money advanced under the loan agreement is required to be repaid in monthly payments over the 12 months following an advance.

Perhaps an actual example can show us just what a scam this kind of loan is.

Let’s say you go and get a $600 loan and relinquish the title to your car to get it. Under the new regulations, the loan company can charge you 22% interest per month on the outstanding balance. Before you walk out the door with your $600, you already owe $732 when your first payment comes due. Let’s say you pay $200 at the start of the next month. That brings the loan down to $532, right? No. That brings the loan down to $532 plus 22% interest, or $649.04 by the time you make your next payment.

Your second payment of $200 should bring you down to $449.04, right? No. The actual outstanding amount now is $547.83. Your third payment of $200 the following month means that you have paid back the original loan, the amount of money you actually got. However, you still own $424.35. Put another way, you didn’t get a loan for $600. That loan was for $600 minus all that interest, which will add up to far more than $600 by the time you are able to get out of the clutches of the car loan sharks.

The new Virginia law says that the car title people are supposed to explain to a potential “customer” the actual cost of the loan. We all know all the ways for a lender to get around that little detail, especially since the lender is dealing with somebody obviously desperate for money. Never forget one fact, though. Anyone who gets a car title loan is actually selling that car to the loan shark, in the hopes of someday being able to buy it back at far, far more than the amount of the loan.

These title loan companies get rich by preying on the misfortune of others because they know most of their clients probably won’t be able to pay back the loan. Even if the car loan was at a reasonable interest rate, the people offering the loan aren’t taking a chance at all. They have in hand from day one the ownership of – and keys to – a vehicle that they got for much less than its blue book value, one that is being insured by the person who in effect no longer owns the vehicle. The borrower even pays the administrative cost of making the loan, through an origination fee. Such loans are a sure-fire way for the lenders to make a fast buck. They can’t lose.

Who would risk the title to their car except someone desperate? The lenders make it sound like they are helping with the misfortunes of life, but actually they are making a fortune at the expense of the unfortunate. The law passed in Virginia does absolutely nothing to rein in these despicable loans. So, how did we get such a crappy law? The way we always seem to – let the regulated and their highly paid lobbyists write the regulations.

According to Bloomberg Businessweek “For years the industry fended off calls for tougher regulation. Since 2005, six companies and industry groups have donated nearly $1.2 million to Virginia lawmakers as legislation to regulate the industry languished in committees. Last year, the industry and its opponents worked with legislators on the compromise.”

Evidently, that’s how regulation works in the Old Dominion, the land of unlimited campaign contributions. The industry that needs to be controlled sits down with the people who are going to write the legislation, and they come up with a metaphorical fig leaf that gives cover to both groups. Legislators can say they “regulated” a bad business. The businesses can chuckle to themselves because they get a “two-fer:” they essentially get to write their own regulations, plus they don’t have to put out all that money in campaign contributions any more. Well, except for the thank-you money to the compliant lawmakers who participated in the whole deal. But, remember. It’s not bribery. It’s just getting “access.”

Arlington Board Chairman Responds to Speaker Howell and Senator Colgan on HOT Lanes

1

On Monday, the Republican Arlington Sun Gazette praised Virginia House of Delegates Speaker Bill Howell (R) and Sen. Chuck Colgan (D) for having “rightly ripped into the Arlington board for bringing race into the lawsuit, and said that Arlington’s ongoing obstructionism is hurting Virginia’s reputation and its ability to bring new jobs to the commonwealth.” According to the right-wing real estate rag Sun Gazette, Arlington’s lawsuit against HOT lanes on I-395/95 “is seen by just about everybody – with the exception of the County Board, county attorney and the D.C. lawyers making huge money on it – as an embarrassment to Arlington and those who govern it, further alienating the county from potential regional allies and state leaders of both political parties.”  

Needless to say, Arlington County Board Chairman Jay Fisette begs to differ. To view his letter to Speaker Howell and Sen. Colgan, see after the “fold.” Among Fisette’s concerns are “the degradation of transit and HOV…the capability to move people, not simply vehicles, as well as the negative secondary effects on local roads and air quality resulting from poor transportation planning and design.” Other than that, it’s a great idea! Heh.



Deliberate Destruction of the Government?

5

If the unremitting drumbeat from the punditry that there is a Republican tsunami on the way in November should prove true, what will happen after November?  Steven Pearlstein, in his column in The Washington Post for Wednesday, 29 September 2010, gave some thought to the appearance of the political landscape if the Chamber of Commerce and Big Business gets its money’s worth, and succeeds in turning Congress Republican red. His short answer to the CEO’s devout hope is: “Be careful what you wish for.”  

Business imagines that with Republicans in control of the House and maybe even the Senate, the climate will become very pro-business, that business will be “setting the agenda, rolling back the socialist tide and forcing an anti-business administration into a humiliating retreat.” Not so fast, folks. In Pearlstein’s judgment:


“In reality, what you’ll get is political paralysis for the next two years, and quite possibly longer than that”

 

because Senator Jim DeMint (R, SC) will be riding high as “the new Republican kingpin and enforcer,” and, in an interview in Bloomberg Businessweek, he promised that “his goal for the next Senate is ‘complete gridlock.'” Without doubt, the eager right-wing  newbies arriving on the crest of the tsunami will follow DeMint’s orders gleefully. DeMint forsees no compromises, and will accept no “watered down Republican philosophy.” This will be war, and it’s once again “my way or the highway.” In other words, ideology over governance.

Pearlstein has some good news on the good-for-business side: Business, will not have to worry about tax increases, or climate-change legislation, or pro-labor legislation like card check. On the other hand, says Pearlstein, there will be no tax reform, no education reform, no infrastructure investment, nor any new trade treaties. In his estimation, neither the remaining Democrats in Congress nor a veto-wielding President will be inclined to strike any deals on business’ priorities.  What if the President tries to do by issuing regulations what Congress under Republicans will not do? If he does try an end run, Republican-controlled committees will respond with hearings, there will be endless lawsuits, and nothing will be resolved until it has wended its way through the courts, likely a years-long process. Therefore, regulatory uncertainties will continue, even if Republicans win in November.

While I myself am not so certain as Pearlstein that Democrats and President Obama will refuse to knuckle under and tamely enable the continued Republican rape of America, I do believe much of what he predicts will come to pass, and we will have a viciously paralyzed government.  That, however, is exactly what Senator DeMint wants, and so do every one of those right-wing Tea Bagging newcomers—– some have even said that it would be ideal for “Congress to take a two-year holiday, or longer.” Pearlstein warns the business community:

“Here is the hard political reality. You can’t expect to support and finance political candidates who preach that government is menacing and wasteful, that public employees are incompetent and corrupt, that taxes are always too high and destroy jobs, and then turn around and expect that the government will respond to your demands to hold down the cost of health care, or fund basic research, or provide good schools, effective courts and reliable transportation systems.”

In other words, Big Business will reap what it has sown; the whirlwind they have created will not be under their control.  Here again, I am not so sure. The Tea Partyers will, I suspect, be as malleable in Congress as they have proven to be in town halls, psychologically manipulated to continue enabling the use of the shell of our political government for the enrichment of the business oligarchy. It may be a bit more difficult than Big Business expects, but I think it will happen, for two main reasons: the power of money (threaten the recalcitrant by withdrawing campaign funds or other emoluments) and the power of their secular religion, Free Market capitalism.

Mr. Pearlstein makes another valid point, that business leaders should blame themselves as well as the media or the blogosphere for the horrible polarization of our system: “….in order to score modest wins in legislative or regulatory battles, (you) make common cause with those who trample on the truth, poison the political conversation, demonize opponents and undermine respect and support for government. Criticize President Obama—- that’s easy, guys. But is there anyone there at the Business Roundtable with the courage to criticize Jim DeMint?”

The real result of a Republican victory, and the entrenchment of Senator DeMint and his happy band of anti-government radicals will be to devalue and trivialize government, the only institution big enough to rein in the excesses of Big Business. Maybe, Mr. Pearlstein, that is the real reason so much corporate money is pouring into the coffers of the Tea Party radicals; it is not to “score modest wins.” The intent is actually to create what you are warning against—- to “undermine respect and support for government.”

Eric Cantor is NOT running unopposed!

0

I’ve been lurking and reading for over a year, but it wasn’t until a few days ago that I saw something that made me want to post.

What I saw was a teeny tiny sign on Hull Street Road in Midlothian for Rick Waugh, who is running against Eric Cantor in the 7th District.  And I mean it was tiny.  If I’d blinked, I would have missed it.

Up until then, I had thought Cantor was running unopposed.

What does this say about the state of our political campaigns?

Is Webb Missing the Main Point on China?

4



In this video, Jim Webb talks about what he sees as “the need to reinvigorate U.S. relations with ASEAN countries and other allies in the region to maintain balance and stability” vis-a-vis China. According to Webb, the “second-tier countries” in the Asia-Pacific region see “any failure by the United States to take firm action when the Chinese manifest aggressive behavior is viewed in this region as a sign of a permeating weakness in the United States.”  In Webb’s view, we need to “stay with our friends” and let China know that “the wrong type of behavior is not going to be rewarded with a weak form of behavior by the United States.”

In my view, that’s fine as far as it goes; there’s nothing wrong with strengthening relations with our allies in the region, and there’s nothing wrong with being strong in our response to outright aggressive behavior by China. However, I believe that Webb largely misses the larger point, of what Anne Applebaum correctly describes as “China’s quiet power grab”. For more on that, see after the “fold.”

Writing the Washington Post yesterday, Applebaum made a few important points.

*”Over the past decade, China has kept silent, lain low and behaved more like a multinational company than a global superpower — and garnered enormous political influence as a result.”

*”America fights, in other words, while China does business, and not only in Afghanistan.”

*Chinese is busy setting up free-trade zones, “investing heavily in energy and ports,” acquiring large stakes in Iraqi oil fields, and generally spreading its economic influence around the world.

*China also has “quietly…cornered the market in rare-earth metals, unusual minerals that have lovely names (promethium, ytterbium) and are vital for the production of cellphones, lasers and computers — not to mention hybrid cars, solar panels and wind turbines.”

All of this is why, according to Applebaum, China has no real need to be belligerent or aggressive militarily, as it’s winning the broader game in a much quieter fashion. Thus, Applebaum concludes, “the scariest thing about China is not the size of its navy or the arrogance of its diplomats…[but] the power China has already accumulated without ever deploying its military or its diplomats at all.”  Meanwhile, as China rises as a great power, the United States remains overextended militarily around the world, while burdened by debt, rapidly rising health care costs, an aging infrastructure, heavy dependence on foreign oil, and many other problems at home. This is the classic recipe for relative decline in national power, and right now we’re following that recipe to the letter.  In the end, I’d argue, until we figure out a way to get our domestic house in order, while reining in our “imperial overstretch,” all the rest of our maneuvers will be for naught.

Virginia, Meet Nicole

1

As rain continues moving up from the south across Virginia, looks like it’s going to get even rougher tomorrow. Tropical Depression 16 is forecast to become Tropical Storm Nicole, moving quickly up the Atlantic Coast over the next few days. How much rain will she bring? Weather.com reports, “Localized amounts of 8 inches or more are not out of question,” in the eastern half of Virginia & the DC area.