Home Blog Page 6

Virginia House Democrats Build Major Fundraising Lead, Drive Momentum in Battleground Districts

0

From the VA House Democrats:

Virginia House Democrats Build Major Fundraising Lead, Drive Momentum in Battleground Districts
RICHMOND,VA—Today, the Virginia House Democratic Caucus announced a commanding fundraising lead over House Republicans—bringing in more than $1.1 million in the first quarter, more than seven times the GOP’s $156,048 haul.

The news comes just days after a Virginia Mercury report revealed a Republican Caucus “fighting for political survival,” as vulnerable incumbents scrambled to rebrand under a so-called “Purple Caucus” to distance themselves from the Trump/Elon agenda.

The latest numbers reflect a surging grassroots movement and growing momentum behind House Democrats—and a clear sign that Virginians are rejecting the far-right policies of the Trump/Elon administration and the Virginia Republicans enabling them.

“Virginia House Republicans are terrified of losing in November—and they should be,” said Campaigns Chair Dan Helmer. “Their agenda is out of step with Virginians, and no last-minute attempt to distance themselves from President Trump and Elon Musk will save them. Voters can see right through it. Democrats are outraising and outworking them—and we’re ready to win in November.”

House Democratic Battleground challengers who outraised their Republican opponents in Q1:

  • Elizabeth Guzman (HD-22)
  • John McAuliff (HD-30)
  • Lily Franklin (HD-41)
  • May Nivar (HD-57)
  • Stacey Carroll (HD-64)
  • Nicole Cole (HD-66)
  • Jessica Anderson (HD-71)
  • Leslie Mehta (HD-73)
  • Virgil Thornton, Sr. (HD-86)

House Democratic Battleground Challengers with more cash on hand than their Republican opponents in Q1:

  • Lily Franklin (HD-41)
  • Kimberly Pope Adams (HD-82)
  • Virgil Thornton (HD-86)

###

SEIU Members Endorse Abigail Spanberger for Governor of Virginia: “Abigail is Exactly the Kind of Governor Virginia’s Workers Deserve”

0

This one’s a no-brainer, unless of course you want a virulently anti-worker/anti-labor governor like Winsome Earle-Sears. Nope!

SEIU Members Endorse Abigail Spanberger for Governor of Virginia

SEIU Virginia State Council Chair: “Abigail is Exactly the Kind of Governor Virginia’s Workers Deserve”

Spanberger: “Supporting Virginia’s Workforce and Economy Should Never Be a Partisan Issue”

RICHMOND, Va. — The SEIU Virginia State Council, which represents more than 11,000 Virginians employed as home care workers, security officers, airport personnel, county and city employees, and other private and public employees across the Commonwealth, today endorsed Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger to serve as the next Governor of Virginia.

“Abigail is exactly the kind of Governor Virginia workers deserve — a leader we can trust to take decisive action to defend our rights, fight for working families, protect hard-earned health and retirement benefits, and respect all working Virginians, no matter where we were born or the color of our skin,” said Jaime Contreras, SEIU Virginia State Council Chair. “Abigail will make sure Virginia workers have a seat at the table — and a champion in Richmond. We’re proud to endorse her to serve as the next Governor of Virginia.”

“I’m grateful to earn the SEIU Virginia State Council’s endorsement, and I’m proud to stand alongside workers across the Commonwealth in building a better future for all Virginians. SEIU employees work every day to keep our families healthy, care for Virginia’s seniors, and protect our communities — and they deserve a voice to advocate for better wages, quality healthcare, and fair treatment in their workplaces,” said Spanberger. “Supporting Virginia’s workforce and economy should never be a partisan issue — and as Virginia’s next Governor, I will defend workers’ rights, create good-paying jobs, and stand up to attacks on Virginia’s workforce.”

“All working families deserve to thrive. For far too long, home care providers and other frontline workers have been ignored, under-paid, and left out of basic labor protections because this work is disproportionately fulfilled by Black, Brown, API, and immigrant women. We all deserve better and we deserve to have a Governor who will fight to make our communities better,” said Samira Brooksa home care provider for over 25 years and member of SEIU Virginia 512. “When we swear in Abigail Spanberger, we will be sending a message that working Virginians want higher wages, paid family and medical leave, and the freedom to collectively bargain — that we want the power to create more of the good jobs that will build a Virginia for all. Abigail Spanberger is committed to empowering working people, and I can’t wait to vote for her this November.”

“I know firsthand how important an ally like Abigail Spanberger is to the working people of Virginia,” said Carlos Durana commercial cleaner and member of 32BJ SEIU. “Last year I was fired from my job because a new company came in and refused to hire me or my coworkers to continue cleaning the building. We need a Governor who will sign Worker Retention legislation and protect good union jobs. We need a Governor who will be a shield and a voice for immigrants’ rights that are constantly attacked. We need Abigail Spanberger. She will be a leader for the working people of Virginia, and that’s why my 32BJ brothers and sisters and I are supporting her in becoming the next Governor of Virginia.”

BACKGROUND

In Congress, Spanberger built a reputation for focusing on the issues that matter most — creating good-paying jobs, strengthening our public schools, and increasing opportunity for every Virginian.

As Virginia’s next Governor, Abigail will always help working Virginians —  and she has made clear her commitment to investing in job training, lowering costs for working families, and pushing back against threats to Virginians’ livelihoods.

###

Constituents Demolish Right-Wing-Internet-Troll-Masquerading-as-Congressman John McGuire (R-VA05)’s Latest Lies: “Posting this crap on social media while they’re sitting in a foreign gulag (if they’re even still alive) is so cowardly. SMDH””

0

As George Orwell and many others have pointed out over the years, a big part of what makes authoritarianism and fascism tick is most definitely their assault on fact, empirical evidence, reason, etc. Because they know that, ultimately, if you can weaken or even destroy people’s grip on reality, it facilitates the authoritarians’ ability to trample the rule of law, impose their own warped version of reality, and ultimately impose their will on the population.

A perfect case-in-point of the above can be found in the daily rantings on Rep. John McGuire (R-VA05)’s Facebook page – where essentially, you have a Congressman who is no better than some random, unhinged, far-right internet troll, just spewing out 100% false, bizarre, extreme crap 24/7 in order to “own the libs”  – and in McGuire’s case, to demonstrate his undying fealty to the Dear Leader, to whom McGuire owes his completely undeserved promotion to the US House of Representatives (can we say, “DEI for completely incompetent and unqualified white guys???).

For the latest example of McGuire’s shit-posting and far-right trolling. As you read this, keep in mind that McGuire posts this type of garbage every day, if not multiple times a day. Also, I’d remind everyone that McGuire was literally outside the U.S. Capitol with the pro-Trump mob on 1/6/21, and that this is very much in character for him…definitely not a one-off or aberration in his case.

Not that McGuire cares, of course, but the responses on his Facebook page to this latest lunacy are excellent.  See below for a few of the best:

If you want to lob these accusations at people, have the honor & patriotism to do it in a U.S. court of law to their faces in accordance with our Constitution. Posting this crap on social media while they’re sitting in a foreign gulag (if they’re even still alive) is so cowardly. SMDH

I encourage everyone, especially Republicans, to read the actual court orders & demand that John insist that the Trump admin follow our courts & Constitution. It doesn’t matter what these people are accused of doing. IN THE USA WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE COURTS & THE LAW!

Here’s what the Supreme Court actually said: “the order properly requires the government to ‘facilitate’ Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador, and to ensure his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.” It then required the district court to clarify its order. The district court did that. The Trump admin is now defying that clarified order. And in a related case in a different federal court today, the court actually found probable cause to hold the Trump admin in criminal contempt.

Here are the actual court orders:

Supreme Court (Norm v Abrego Garcia): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf

District Court (Noem v Abrego Garcia): https://storage.courtlistener.com/…/gov.uscourts.mdd…

District Court (JGG v Trump) finding probable cause of contempt: https://storage.courtlistener.com/…/gov.uscourts.dcd...

Bingo: “Posting this crap on social media while they’re sitting in a foreign gulag (if they’re even still alive) is so cowardly. SMDH”

Here’s another superb response:

LIES. The police officer who accused Abrego of being an MS-13 gang member in a place Abrego has *never lived* has been suspended from duty for providing classified information to a sex worker, with whom he was having a relationship.

In the Oval Office yesterday, Trump and his handlers mocked and lied about the Supreme Court’s ruling, and have provided *zero* evidence that they are trying to facilitate Abrego’s return.

America has returned lots of people it has wrongfully deported. Trump is acting like an El Salvadoran dictator.

Again, nailed it. And yes…

The Supreme Court ruled all those men deported were deprived of their legal right to due process.

That’s a Supreme Court with a 6-3 conservative/right-wing majority, by the way, including three Justices appointed by Trump himself!

John, at least it seems like your staff actually prepared their own write up this time. Doesn’t make it any less ignorant, but you tried. So much you have wrong, but I’ll stick to your misunderstanding of the Supreme Court ruling:

When you read the actual ruling:

– Trump believes they ruled for him because of this line: “Due to the administrative stay issued by THE CHIEF JUSTICE, the deadline imposed by the District Court has now passed. To that extent, the Government’s emergency application is effectively granted in part and the deadline in the challenged order is no longer effective.” i.e. the question is moot and no longer presents a live controversy. As such, the court can’t make a decision due to the Article III requirement that courts only hear actual cases or controversies.

– He also seems to be under the impression that the Supreme Court asking the District Court to clarify its order to “effectuate” is the same as ruling for him – it clearly is not. It is instructed the District Court to be more specific.

– Notably, the Supreme Court orders the Trump administration to be “prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps.” That doesn’t sound like a Supreme Court that is happy with the administration’s legal team.

– The ruling also reiterates the original US representation that Abrego Garcia’s removal was illegal. Which absolutely flies in the face of what you claim in this post.
Taken together, this wasn’t quite the win Trump’s team is positioning it as being. And if you lose Thomas and Alito, then you are likely to be really unhappy in the future.

It would be good if you brought constitutional law and judicial experts onto your staff. I’m pretty sure the constitutional guidance is about to come in handy, and the judicial guidance could keep you from having your foot so firmly lodged in your esophagus. I mean, if a lowly software dev turned director can learn about this, surely a Congressional Representative should too?

Quick addendum because I just can’t let it pass:
You bring up the 14th Amendment, which does mention due process, but is mostly about clarifying that due process requirements apply to the states as well as the federal government. What you want to be looking at is the 4th Amendment – which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, houses, papers, and effects – and the 5th Amendment which requires due process of law.

Again, this is pretty basic stuff that a person on staff could help with.

On and on it goes…cogent, fact-based rebuttals to far-right-internet-troll-masquerading-as-a-Congressman John McGuire’s latest insanity. Not that it will matter to McGuire, of course, but every voter in VA05 should be aware that THIS is what their representative in the US House is up to, day after day. And they should SERIOUSLY evaluate whether McGuire is the best person they can find, in the entire 5th Congressional district, to represent them, or whether – in fact – McGuire brings shame on VA05, on Virginia and on America every single day…

Thursday News: “Trump Is Helping Putin Kill Ukrainians”; Sen. Van Hollen “Blocked From Visiting Hell Cells” in El Salvador; “David Hogg’s New Maneuver Is Ill-Advised – and Worse-Timed”; “Youngkin and Earle-Sears were all in on DEI – until they weren’t”

0

by Lowell

Here are a few international, national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Thursday, April 17.

Virginia Fundraising for Governor, Lt. Governor and Attorney General Dropped Over 40% in 1Q25 Compared to 1Q21. What Might Have Caused That?

0

According to this reporter, “Va. candidates raised a staggering $20.4M in the first quarter, campaign finance reports show.” That seemed odd to me, since the amount raised in 1Q25 didn’t seem particularly “staggering” to me, but I wanted to do a sanity check on this, so I went back and looked at VPAP to check 1Q21 fundraising numbers. Here’s what I found.

  • In 1Q21, gubernatorial candidates raised about $22 million. In 1Q25, gubernatorial candidates raised about $9.8 million – less than half the 1Q21 total.
  • In 1Q21, lieutenant governor candidates raised about $2.5 million. In 1Q25, lieutenant governor candidates raised slightly lower than that, about $2.4 million.
  • In 1Q21, attorney general candidates raised about $1.8 million. In 1Q25, attorney general candidates raised about $3 million, so that’s actually higher than in 1Q21.
  • In total, governor/LG/AG candidates raised over $26 million in 1Q21 vs. just over $15 million in 1Q25…a significant (43%) decline from 1Q21.

The question is, *why* did fundraising for these three statewide offices decline so much between 1Q21 and 1Q25.

  • For starters, most of it is accounted for by the sharp drop in gubernatorial fundraising, thanks in large part  to the fact that in 2021, there were intense, contested primaries for both the Democratic and Republican gubernatorial nominations, with candidates including prolific fundraisers like Terry McAuliffe (D) and Glenn Youngkin (R), along with Pete Snyder (R), Jennifer Carroll Foy (D), Jennifer McClellan (D), Kirk Cox (R), etc.
  • There were also hotly contested primaries for both the Democratic and Republican Lt. Governor nominations in 2021…much more similar to this year, thus not surprisingly the amounts raised in 1Q21 and 1Q25 are similar.
  • As for attorney general, in 2021 there were primaries on both the Democratic side (incumbent Mark Herring vs. challenger Jay Jones) and Republican side (Jason Miyares vs. Chuck Smith, Leslie Haley and Jack White). This time around, there is an AG primary only on the Democratic side, and yet total fundraising for AG has gone up from 1Q25, mostly because Jason Miyares only raised $208k in 1Q21, whereas this past quarter, as the incumbent, he raised a massive $1.5 million. That basically accounts for the increase in AG fundraising from 1Q21 to 1Q25.

Does any of this indicate a decline in enthusiasm from 2021? I’d argue probably not, that it’s more about the mix of candidates in 2021 (e.g., mega millionaire Glenn Youngkin and mega fundraiser Terry McAuliffe) vs. 2025 (while Abigail Spanberger is a strong fundraiser, she’s not personally wealthy, and Winsome Sears isn’t known as a particularly strong fundraiser) but it’s hard to say for sure. Of course, in both 2021 and 2025, the Virginia elections take place a year after a new president – and a party flip – was elected, with Joe Biden replacing Donald Trump in 2020, and Donald Trump replacing Joe Biden in 2024. How that translates into fundraising for the Virginia elections the next year, however, is complicated – but there’s definitely no sign of any *increase* in fundraising, or the number of candidates for that matter, in 2025 compared to 2021. Conclude from that what you will…

P.S. As a smart Virginia political observer just pointed out to me, it’s also possible that Virginia and national Republicans realize that Democrats are *heavily* favored this year, whereas in 2021 it was much more of a tossup, so it’s quite possible that the amount of money spent this time around will accordingly be lower…

1Q25 Fundraising Totals for Virginia Statewide, Other Offices

2

Courtesy of VPAP, see below for the latest fundraising totals for the first quarter of 2025 – and cash on hand (as of 3/31/25) – for Virginia 2025 statewide and other candidates. These numbers will help tell us who the leading candidates are, with just over two months until the Democratic and Republican primaries on June 17. Also, to see how much the candidates raised in 2H24, click here.

US SENATE:

  • Democratic incumbent Sen. Mark Warner raised over $3 million in 1Q25, spent $679k in 1Q25 and had $7.9 million cash-on-hand as of 3/31/25.

GOVERNOR:

  • Democrat Abigail Spanberger reported receipts of $6.7 million from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $2.3 million; and cash-on-hand of $11.0 million as of 3/31/25.
  • Republican Winsome Sears reported receipts of $3.1 million from 1/1 to 3/31, expenditures of $1.2 million; and cash-on-hand of $4.0 million as of 3/31/25. Also, the “Winsome PAC” reported $147k in receipts, $198k in expenses and $365k cash-on-hand as of 3/31/25.

LT. GOVERNOR

  • Democrat Alex Bastani reported receipts of $134k (almost all self-funded) from 1/13 to 3/31, expenditures of $101k; and cash-on-hand of $33k as of 3/31/25.
  • Democrat Ghazala Hashmi reported receipts of $306k from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $197k; and cash-on-hand of $656k as of 3/31/25. Hashmi also raised $40k in her State Senate account, spent $46k and had $1.2k in cash-on-hand there.
  • Democrat Babur Lateef reported receipts of $398k from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $297k and cash-on-hand of $381k as of 3/31/25.
  • Democrat Aaron Rouse reported receipts of $398k from 1/1 to 3/31, expenditures of $139k; and cash-on-hand of $926k as of 3/31/25.
  • Democrat Victor Salgado reported receipts of $125k from 1/3 to 3/31, expenditures of $98k; and cash-on-hand of $106k as of 3/31/25.
  • Democrat Levar Stoney reported receipts of $429k from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $446k; and cash-on-hand of $523k as of 3/31/25.
  • Republican Pat Herrity reported receipts of $540k from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $205k; and cash-on-hand of $335k as of 3/31/25.
  • Republican John Reid reported receipts of $178k from 1/27 to 3/31; expenditures of $87k; and cash-on-hand of $91k as of 3/31/25.

ATTORNEY GENERAL

  • Democrat Jay Jones reported receipts of $931k from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $229k; and cash-on-hand of $1.49 million as of 3/31/25.
  • Democrat Shannon Taylor reported receipts of $534k (including $228k transferred from her Commonwealth’s Attorney account) from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $227k; and cash-on-hand of $666k as of 3/31/25.
  • Republican Jason Miyares reported receipts of $1.5 million from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $655k; and cash-on-hand of $2.12 million as of 3/31/25. Also, Miyares’ “A Safer Virginia” PAC raised $105k, spent $283k and had $2.55 million cash-on-hand as of 3/31/25.

HOUSE OF DELEGATES

  • Speaker Don Scott reported receipts of $813k from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $181k; and cash-on-hand of $2.46 million as of 3/31/25. Also, Speaker Scott’s Virginia Future Generations PAC raised $269k from 1/1 to 3/31, spent $213k and had $779k in cash-on-hand as of 3/31/25.
  • House Republican Leader Todd Gilbert reported receipts of $119k from 1/1 to 3/31; expenditures of $83k; and cash-on-hand of $583k as of 3/31/25. Also, Gilbert’s Republican Commonwealth Leadership PAC raised $557k from 1/1 to 3/31, spent $174k and had $1.19 million cash-on-hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD01: Del. Patrick Hope raised $22k, had $51k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; primary challenger Sean Epstein raised $22k, had $19k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; primary challenger Arjoon Srikanth raised $39k, had $20k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD22: Democrat Elizabeth Guzman raised $1491k and had $114k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Republican incumbent Del. Ian Lovejoy raised just $25k and had just $40k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD30: Democrat John McAuliffe raised $171k and had $141k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Republican incumbent Del. Geary Higgins raised $38k and had $168k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD41: Democrat Lily Franklin raised $190k and had $185k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Republican incumbent Del. Chris Obenshain raised just $50k and had just $48k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD57: Democrat Andrew Schear raised $13k and had $7k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Democrat May Nivar raised $93k and had $105k cash on hand as of 3/31/25;  Republican incumbent Del. David Owen raised just $37.6k and had $135k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD71: Democrat Jessica Anderson raised $115k and had $157k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Republican incumbent Del. Amanda Batten raised $15k and had $254k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD73: Republican incumbent Del. Mark Earley Jr. raised just $28k and had $55k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Democrat Leslie Mehta raised $53k and had $35k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.; Democrat Justin Woodford raised $ and had $ cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD75: Republican incumbent Del. Carrie Coyner raised $132k and had $322k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Democrat Lindsey Dougherty raised $14k and had $12k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Democrat Stephen Miller-Pitts raised $4.3k and had $4.3k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Democrat Dustin Wade raised $69k and had $60k cash on hand as of 3/31/25;
  • HD82: Democrat Kimberly Pope Adams raised $103k and had $120k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; incumbent Del. Kim Taylor (R) raised $117k and had $61k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD86: Democrat Virgil Gene Thornton raised $55k and had $34k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; incumbent Del. A.C. Cordoza (R) raised just $8k and had $32k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD89: Democrat Blaizen Buckshot Bloom raised $9k and had $3k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.; Democrat Karen Robins Carnegie raised $32k and had $21k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.; Republican Mike Lamonea raised $75k and had $54k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.; Republican Kristen Shannon raised $21k and had $14.6k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.
  • HD97: Democratic incumbent Del. Michael Feggans raised $60k and had $62k cash on hand as of 3/31/25; Republican challenger Tim Anderson raised $112k and had $83k cash on hand as of 3/31/25.

 

Wednesday News: “Judge in deportation case threatens Trump admin with contempt of court”; “America, This Is an Old and Brutal Tyranny”; “Biden says Trump administration has ‘done so much damage’ since taking office”; “Harvard knows: complicity won’t save you”

0

by Lowell

Here are a few international, national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Wednesday, April 16.

As Sam Shirazi Points Out It Now “seems official…[Sen. Mark] Warner is running for re-election in 2026.” Here Are a Few Thoughts.

1

As you can see from Sen. Mark Warner’s campaign press release a little while ago, it definitely appears – as Sam Shirazi points out – that it “seems official…Warner is running for re-election in 2026.” Also, as Sam Shirazi points out, “Warner certainly a favorite in Trump midterm,” with the “only question…if Governor Youngkin runs.” My guess is that Youngkin will test the waters, but in the end won’t pull the trigger if he thinks it’s unlikely he’d win this race. But we’ll see; Youngkin certainly likes being in the spotlight, even if he brings almost nothing of substance, unless you count 24/7 bootlicking and groveling to Trump as “substance.” LOL

As for Sen. Mark Warner, I mostly think he does a good job and is, along with Sen. Tim Kaine, part of one of the most effective US Senate teams in the country. A few more thoughts on Sen. Warner, in no particular order, are:

  • Since he was elected governor in 2001, he’s been one of the most successful politicians in Virginia, leaving the governor’s mansion with approval ratings in the 70%s (!), then absolutely *crushing* former Gov. Jim Gilmore, 65%-34%, in the 2008 election for US Senate and defeating Republican Daniel Gade by 12 points (56%-44%) in 2020, with a near-brush with political mortality in the “Tea Party”/”red wave” midterm year of 2014, when Warner came within 19,000 votes of losing to Republican Ed Gillespie. But mostly, Warner’s been a political force in Virginia for a quarter century, and one would have to think he enters the 2026 reelection campaign as the favorite to win. (note: a January 2025 poll found “45% said they would support current Sen. Warner, while 38% would support [Glenn] Youngkin.” So…if that’s accurate, Warner starts with a comfortable lead over Youngkin.
  • While some on the left have expressed interest in Sen. Warner facing a Democratic primary, I’d say the chances of a serious intra-party challenge to Warner are minimal. If one *does* happen, it presumably would be a younger challenger, one with significant charisma and access to campaign contributions. It would presumably challenge Warner on several fronts – forcefulness in fighting back against Trump? willingness to work “across the aisle” vs. being MUCH more confrontational and partisan? ideology, given that Warner has always framed himself as a “moderate”/”radical centrist”/etc? But as of now, I’d be really surprised if Warner ended up facing a serious, credible, well-funded primary challenge…especially given that the VCU poll in January 2025 found that the “vast majority of Democrats (88%) stated they would vote for Warner.”
  • Whether you like him or not, Sen. Warner is very smart and knowledgeable on many areas of policy, including foreign policy, intelligence, the military, economics, technology, etc. The only area where I haven’t been particularly impressed with Warner’s expertise, really, has been energy, where for instance he seems to actually be enthused about the super-expensive/technologically-not-even-close-to-ready-for-primetime “Small Modular Reactors” and nuclear fusion power. But other than that, if you listen to Sen. Warner in his weekly press availabilities, you’ve got to come away impressed with his incredibly wide range of knowledge and ability to speak authoritatively on just about any subject, off the cuff, in detail. Sen. Warner may be 70 years old, but he doesn’t seem to have lost a step in terms of energy or mental sharpness.
  • Personally, I’d like see *all* Democratic Senators, including Senators Warner and Kaine, be less willing to maintain “norms” vis-a-vis Trump, given that Trump is busy smashing any/all norms, rule of law, etc. Specifically, while I understand Sen. Kaine’s reasoning (and presumably Sen. Warner’s reasoning is similar) on voting for numerous Trump Cabinet picks, I simply don’t agree that this is the way to proceed at this point. For instance, to me it was glaringly obvious that Marco Rubio would be a terrible Secretary of State, and that Kristi Noem would be a disaster as Secretary of Homeland Security, yet Rubio was confirmed 99-0, while 34 Democrats (including Sen. Kaine, although not Sen. Warner) voted to confirm Noem. Personally, I would have voted against the vast majority of Trump’s Cabinet picks, given that they were/are a combination of extreme, corrupt, unqualified, etc. And yes, they would have been confirmed regardless of how Democrats voted, but to me, that’s a reason to just do the right thing – and vote no. So that’s frustrating, although in the end, I don’t think it is – or necessarily should be – enough to justify a primary challenge to Sen. Warner or most other Senate Democratic incumbents. Because, in the end, Trump *was* elected president, *was* going to get his Cabinet (since Democrats are in the minority in the Senate), and the only question was the best strategy to deal with this deplorable situation…

Video: While Rep. Rob Wittman (R-VA01) Stays Silent, VA State Senator Ghazala Hashmi Holds a Town Hall to Hear from VA-01 Residents

0

From State Senator Ghazala Hashmi’s campaign:

While Wittman Stays Silent, Senator Ghazala Hashmi Holds Town Hall to Hear from VA-01 Residents

Richmond, VA –  As Congressman Rob Wittman continues to hide from his constituents by avoiding in-person public forums, Senator Ghazala Hashmi stepped up to fill the void. Last night she held a town hall to give residents of Virginia’s 1st District a platform to voice their concerns and more than a hundred community members attended, raising issues from rising costs to Trump and Musk’s threats against public education and Medicaid.

At a time of growing national instability—fueled by Trump-era policies that have cost Virginians jobs and jeopardized access to health care—Senator Hashmi made clear that showing up and listening to constituents is non-negotiable.

“We’re going to see the impact that is about to happen in just a few months for hundreds of thousands of Virginians. Impact on education, you don’t have to actually shut down a federal agency is what we’re seeing – you can just fire the staff,” said Sen. Hashmi at the town hall. “This is something Congressman Wittman should be standing up and defending. Have any of you seen him say he is not going to support that budget that will be passed which strips away Medicaid?  I haven’t… We need to have a Governor, a Lieutenant Governor and Attorney General who is going to be fighting for us on that.

Here is a video with highlights of Sen. Hashmi’s remarks.

Senators Kaine, Warner Demand Answers from Departments of State, Homeland Security on Sudden and Unexplained Revocations of Virginia Students’ Visas

5

Good to see, although the chances of getting answers from Rubio (who the US Senate voted 99-0 to confirm, astoundingly!) and Noem (who several Democrats actually voted to confirm, also astoundingly!) are…???

KAINE & WARNER DEMAND ANSWERS FROM DEPARTMENTS OF STATE AND HOMELAND SECURITY ON SUDDEN AND UNEXPLAINED REVOCATIONS OF VIRGINIA STUDENTS’ VISAS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Tim Kaine, a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, and Mark R. Warner (both D-VA) sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem demanding information and action on the growing number of Virginia college and university students whose visas or records have been abruptly terminated without due process, a means of seeking recourse, or even notification to the students or their schools.

“We write to you today expressing extreme concern after hearing from institutions of higher education throughout Virginia and the country that the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security are working together to revoke the nonimmigrant (F-1, M-1, or J-1) visas of their students. Such revocations are then used to terminate these students’ records in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), potentially affecting their ability to attend school,” wrote the senators. “Worse, State and DHS are taking such actions without providing any notice to the affected students or their schools, with only vague, non-individualized reasons given for terminations in SEVIS.”

“The chaos caused by your actions is not acceptable. We believe in the rule of law and that immigration laws should be enforced. That starts with the Constitution and its guarantees of free speech and due process. These Constitutional protections apply to noncitizens in the United States, including people in nonimmigrant status,” continued the senators. “If there are international students in the United States in violation of our criminal or immigration laws, they should be removed. But summarily revoking these students’ visas and/or terminating their records in SEVIS without any notice to the students or their schools undermines confidence in State and DHS’s judgment and erodes Americans’ trust in the immigration system and the rule of law. Such distrust will be exploited by the very people who want to harm the United States.”

The senators posed the following questions:

  1. Since January 20, 2025, how many F-1, M-1, or J-1 nonimmigrant visas have the State Department revoked for people attending schools in Virginia? For each revoked visa, please provide the justification given for the revocation.
  2. For those whose F-1, M-1, or J-1 visas were revoked in question 1, how many had their records terminated in SEVIS?
  3. Since January 20, 2025, has the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) terminated the SEVIS records of any students attending school in Virginia whose nonimmigrant visas have not been revoked by the State Department? For each such termination, please provide the specific reason why their SEVIS records were terminated, and specify what evidence SEVP reviewed before terminating each record.
  4. How would a Virginia student whose visa has been revoked and/or had their SEVIS record terminated be notified that this has happened? How would their schools be notified that this has happened? If a student or school believes that such revocation and/or termination has been made in error, what are the avenues for review or appeal of the revocation and/or termination? How long would such process take?

Full text of the letter can be found here and below:

Dear Secretary Rubio and Secretary Noem: 

We write to you today expressing extreme concern after hearing from institutions of higher education throughout Virginia and the country that the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security are working together to revoke the nonimmigrant (F-1, M-1, or J-1) visas of their students. Such revocations are then used to terminate these students’ records in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), potentially affecting their ability to attend school. Worse, State and DHS are taking such actions without providing any notice to the affected students or their schools, with only vague, non-individualized reasons given for terminations in SEVIS. Furthermore, there is no clear process for these students to ascertain why their record was terminated in SEVIS, then to challenge the termination if they believe that DHS or State has made an error in their case. To date, over 1,000 international students have had their student visas revoked and/or SEVIS records terminated nationwide, including in the Commonwealth of Virginia.[1]  

The chaos caused by your actions is not acceptable. We believe in the rule of law and that immigration laws should be enforced. That starts with the Constitution and its guarantees of free speech and due process. These Constitutional protections apply to noncitizens in the United States, including people in nonimmigrant status.

If there are international students in the United States in violation of our criminal or immigration laws, they should be removed. But summarily revoking these students’ visas and/or terminating their records in SEVIS without any notice to the students or their schools undermines confidence in State and DHS’s judgment and erodes Americans’ trust in the immigration system and the rule of law. Such distrust will be exploited by the very people who want to harm the United States.

Over 1.1 million international students matriculated to U.S. colleges and universities in 2023-2024, contributing over $40 billion into the U.S. economy and supporting 378,175 jobs.[2] Virginia is proud to be home to more than 170 colleges and universities, including community colleges and highly prestigious research universities that enroll international students. These students pay for the privilege and contribute tremendously to the academic intuitions and the communities in which they live.

We want all our students to feel safe, supported, and secure in their studies so they can focus on their education. As such, we are deeply concerned that this administration’s policies surrounding student visas will result in severe consequences to universities and colleges, and their surrounding communities.

To better assist us in understanding the impacts of State and DHS’s action, no later than April 30, 2025, please provide us with the following information:

  1. Since January 20, 2025, how many F-1, M-1, or J-1 nonimmigrant visas have the State Department revoked for people attending schools in Virginia? For each revoked visa, please provide the justification given for the revocation.
  2. For those whose F-1, M-1, or J-1 visas were revoked in question 1, how many had their records terminated in SEVIS?
  3. Since January 20, 2025, has the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) terminated the SEVIS records of any students attending school in Virginia whose nonimmigrant visas have not been revoked by the State Department? For each such termination, please provide the specific reason why their SEVIS records were terminated, and specify what evidence SEVP reviewed before terminating each record.
  4. How would a Virginia student whose visa has been revoked and/or had their SEVIS record terminated be notified that this has happened? How would their schools be notified that this has happened? If a student or school believes that such revocation and/or termination has been made in error, what are the avenues for review or appeal of the revocation and/or termination? How long would such process take?

We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,