The good news first: our Governor set yesterday as
the goal for ending veteran homelessness in Virginia; he declared a “functional
end” in November. The bad news: that’s a fairly meaningless accomplishment. There
is much to applaud in the administration’s efforts to help veterans in Virginia.
homelessness is that there are no homeless veterans except those who have been
offered housing and turned it down. It can also mean that the number of
veterans becoming homeless is less than or equal to the number who are leaving homelessness.
So by definition veterans will remain homeless. But accepting that as reality,
the concept was originally operationalized in local jurisdictions where the challenge
can be reasonably addressed; communities where the task of identifying homeless
veterans and providing accommodations is manageable and meaningful. Finding a homeless
veteran in a community and locating nearby housing is different than saying we
have more available housing than we have identified homeless veterans statewide;
particularly in a state as large as Virginia. It doesn’t matter to a homeless
veteran in Winchester that there is a roof available in Norfolk.
Department of Veteran Services apparently believes “an extra (administrative) layer”
by having the state involved provides an umbrella that is more effective than
the community based support elsewhere in the nation. What that really allows is
an aggregate approach that compares apples to oranges. With the funding and
staffing for Virginia Veteran and Family Support inadequate to provide one-stop
shopping, an action passed is an action completed. A handoff to another agency
or non-profit can constitute task accomplishment; there is no formal follow-up or informal capacity to do so.
Most communities in Virginia have only a vague understanding of their homeless population.
There are no consistent local staffing or budgets to define the problem. And Department
of Social Service Offices are already overtasked. The bottom line: it is rare
that a Virginia community can identify homeless veterans in its jurisdiction
much less match them to the resources available. This is most often shuffled off to not-for-profits.
zero.” Only one state, Virginia, has. Another, Connecticut, sort of dodges the
whole concept by flatly saying it has ended “chronic homelessness.” There has
yet to be a single local Virginia jurisdiction claiming functional zero yet we
have a whole state that has. Is this a case where the sum is greater than its parts? No, it is not.