State Senator Donald McEachin isn't particularly impressed with Bob McDonnell's "surplus."
"When I hear the word surplus, I assume that we've met all of our unmet needs, and clearly we haven't done that in Virginia," said Sen. Donald McEachin (D-Henrico)...."I think the overarching problem is we do not have the political will to raise revenue," McEachin said, referencing the idea of raising the gasoline tax, or freezing car tax relief.Another "overarching problem" is what Doug Mataconis calls "creative accounting... used to make people think that the financial picture of the state is better than it actually is." "Creative," as in "skipping payments to the Virginia Retirement System to the tune of $620 million." Nice.
With that, here's a statement from Nathan Daschle of the Democratic Governors Association.
Nathan Daschle, executive director of the Democratic Governors Association, issued the following statement today regarding a $1 million dollar contribution from News Corp., parent company of Fox News, to the Republican Governors Association.
"By contributing $1 million to the Republican Governors Association, Fox has crossed a bright line. Fox can no longer pretend that it is a 'fair and balanced' news organization when Rupert Murdoch greenlights a million dollar contribution to defeat Democratic governors.
"Time and time again, Fox News has defended itself against accusations that it is nothing more than a tool of the Republican Party. We know now that the reality is so much worse: they're bankrolling the GOP. FOX's news division is ignoring the fact that its own parent company made a direct and unprecedented partisan contribution to defeat Democrats. This is hypocrisy at its worst, and is a sad day for all of us who believe that an independent and impartial media is vital to our democracy.
"Not only does this contribution severely compromise Fox's news reporting, but it even breaks Fox's own promise to its shareholders that it won't give money to benefit office holders.
"While it might be naive to think this will ever happen, we can only hope that Fox will own up to the activities and that its stable of opinion hosts like Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly will do the right thing and call on their company to return the contribution."
By the way, also worth noting is that Hurt's "name recognition" is 75%, while Perriello's is 95%. As Waldo writes, "I think it's good news that Hurt's name recognition is comparatively low, because that gives Perriello a chance to define him." Good point, and that's where Tom's money advantage - not to mention his far superior public speaking and debating skills, intellect, integrity, work ethic, raw courage, etc. - comes in handy. This should be interesting.
P.S. Welcome back Waldo to the world of blogging. As he points out, it's been a rough month for him. Ugh.
1. MCDONNELL ANNOUNCES ADVISORY COUNCIL FOR HEALTH-CARE
6. MCDONNELL: NO TO MOSQUE
8. MCDONNELL, BOLLING HEADLINE FUNDRAISER FOR FLORIDA'S MARCO RUBIO
9. BOLLING SEES SIGNS OF HOPE IN STATE'S ECONOMY
10. VIRGINIA OFFICIALS MAKE CASE FOR GATES TO KEEP JOINT FORCES COMMAND OPEN
11. WEBB CALLS FOR CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS INTO DEFENSE CUTS IN VIRGINIA
16. MCDONNELL TRIES TO INCREASE SMALL, WOMEN AND MINORITY BUSINESS PROCUREMENT
18. 2ND DISTRICT INDEPENDENT GETS SEAT AT DEBATE TABLE
19. DOZENS IN CHATHAM TURN OUT FOR TOWN HALL
21. VA. COLLEGES AMONG TOP-RANKED SCHOOLS
31. U-VA. GETS SERIOUS ON RELATIONSHIP VIOLENCE
39. DESPITE DROUGHT, OUTLOOK IS GOOD FOR VIRGINIA APPLE CROP
About a dozen right-wing Christians, carrying placards and yelling "Islam is a lie," angrily confronted worshippers outside a Fairfield Avenue mosque Friday.
"Jesus hates Muslims," they screamed at worshippers arriving at the Masjid An-Noor mosque to prepare for the holy month of Ramadan. One protester shoved a placard at a group of young children leaving the mosque. "Murderers," he shouted.
But wait, this mosque isn't anywhere near "Ground Zero," so what are these fine Americans upset about? Boy, this is a tough one, let me put on my thinking cap and consider words starting with "b" and ending with "i-g-o-t-r-y." Hmmmm.
P.S. Also, see Eugene Robinson, who writes, "it's hard to think of a better way to give extremist ideology a major boost than to demonstrate what far too many of the world's 1 billion Muslims already believe is true: that the West rejects not just extremism but Islam itself." Heckuva job, Newt, Sarah, et al!
Also, see Richard Cohen, who notes that "The inclination to go from the particular to the general -- to blame a people for the acts of a few -- is what has always fueled pogroms and race riots." In this case, a few demented, warped, evil individuals murdered thousands of Americans, while 99.9999% of Muslims did NOT murder anyone. And no, that's not a difficult concept.
Did Marco Rubio forget to invite somebody to this or what? Hint: the person not on the invitation is a media-appointed "rising star in the Republican Party" like Rubio; he's an attorney who served in the state legislature, like Rubio; he has views as right wingnutty as Rubio's; and, like Rubio, he has issues with campaign contributions. Now who could that be?
UPDATE: In the comments section, Ben Tribbett says that Cooch did an event for Rubio previously, and that "I bet McDonnell/Bolling didn't want him there taking the credit for backing Rubio 'early'." Interesting.
So...just in case Democrats attempt to jam "cap and trade" legislation through a "lamb duck session" (seriously, that's what this person wrote - "lamb duck!" - LOL) after the November elections, "Sideshow" Bob Marshall's House Bill No. 1397 will ensure that "No state agency shall assist any federal agency in the implementation of a federal global warming or climate change building code." In addition, as if Ken Kook-inelli needs any further encouragement, "The Attorney General is authorized to initiate legal action against the federal government if there is any federal law, regulation, or policy that seeks to apply federal 'cap and trade' legislation to Virginia."
So, there you have it: even as we watch global warming ravage the planet right before our eyes, and even as monolithic Republican opposition (along with a few "coal-state" Democrats) in the U.S. Senate blocks any action to deal with it, "Sideshow" Bob Marshall is gearing up to save us from the scourge of this Reagan Administration, consrvative Republican, free market idea known as "cap and trade."
(begin snark) By the way, this is only the latest example of "Sideshow Bob"'s heroic fight against liberalism> Whether it's saving us from the evils of equality for GLBT citizens, of having affordable and high-quality health care, or of saving our planet from climate disaster, Bob Marshall is always there for us. And for that, we should all be thankful. (/end snark)
Last week, the case for signing over California to the Prince of Darkness was made on American Family Radio by David Barton, a Christian activist who served as vice-chairman of the Texas Republican Party from 1998 to 2006. "Right now, the damage is limited to California only," Barton noted. But he feared that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, the swing vote in an appeal, "will go for California, which means that all 31 states [that have banned gay marriage] will go down in flames."Ah, flames...warm, toasty flames! Ha. Seriously, though, if Barton's right that "the odds are 999 out of 1000 that [the Supreme Court will] uphold the California decision [striking down Proposition 8]," then I'm all for it going to the Supreme Court. The question is, are those really the odds? That's what I'm not so sure about, but ultimately, it might be a risk worth taking to get rid of Marshall-Newman and its fellow "hate amendments" in states across America.
First off, I agree with Gerson that President Obama has, in this case, exhibited "a peculiar talent for enraging his critics while deflating the enthusiasm of his friends." Thus, Obama's Ramadan speech was "an unqualified defense of both religious liberty and religious tolerance," but then Obama appeared to back off somewhat, at least in tone. Exasperating.
Other than being awkward and frustrating, however, I agree with Gerson that "Obama had no choice but the general path he took." As Gerson explains, if Obama had come out in opposition to the right of Muslims - or any other religious group - to build a house of worship anywhere in America, it would have constituted "an unprecedented act of sectarianism, alienating an entire faith tradition from the American experiment."