Home Blog Page 2066

Anger, Defiance in Giles County

2

Shit hit the proverbial fan in Giles County during a meeting last night to discuss the Mountain Valley pipeline, which will be built right through Giles County.  

300 people showed up at the meeting and a number of these folks showed up and voiced their outrage over the pipeline –  but the one thing never mentioned by these same people was their views on fracking, and that is a big part of this equation.

A pipeline is a direct results of fracking.  If there was no fracking, there would be no need for these types of pipelines.  I adamantly opposed to fracking and these pipelines, but most GOP voters support the GOP’s energy policies, including fracking, and the resulting pipleines.

So, I find it hard to be sympathetic to a county that supports the GOP energy policies by delivering big numbers of their votes for GOP candidates, who in turn, pass legislation like fracking.

Giles County is pretty darn Republican and it certainly has a Tea Party bent in its electorate.  Look at these results from some past elections:

2014 – Gillespie – 60%

2013 – Obenshain – 68%

2012 – Romney – 62%

So what we have here is a solid red county, who gives BIG margins to GOP candidates, who in turn, support policies like, fracking.  But now that a pipeline is being built in their county, the very voters who support the candidates who passed fracking legislation are now showing up at meetings with their “Not in my backyard” mentality.  

The pipelines are going to be built – it’s now a question of exactly what route the pipeline will take.  

I really have difficulty feeling bad for GOP voters in places like Giles County, and throughout many parts of West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, because they got exactly what they wanted by the ballots they cast.  So let them deal with the resulting fallout of lower property values, etc., and perhaps they’ll do a bit more thinking before they cast their next ballot.  

 

Virginia News Headlines: Friday Morning

13

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, November 21.

*Obama acts on immigration (“Overhaul shields 4 million from deportation”)

*Republicans confront own worst enemy on immigration (Popcorn time as they tear each other apart.)

*Everything You Need To Know About Obama’s Executive Action

*Republicans Plotting Extreme Measures To Sabotage Obama’s Immigration Action (Bunch of nihilists.)

*Immigration plan’s winners and losers

*Kobach Wonders If Hispanic Majority Would Conduct ‘Ethnic Cleansing’ In U.S. (These are the type of right-wing extremist nuts Boehner and McConnell have to deal with. Good luck!)

*When Fox Hosts Had No Problem Calling Voters Stupid

*On immigration, the GOP should make the next move (“Republicans, obstinate and inert for so long on immigration, cannot dodge responsibility.”)

*Law and precedent are on Obama’s side, legal experts say (Right, and the bottom line is all House Republicans have to do is allow the bipartisan Senate immigration bill to come to a vote. It will become law, and Obama’s executive orders will become moot to a large extent.)

*Is Jim Webb 2016’s Barack Obama? (Uhhhhh….no.)

*Jim Webb Wanted to Punch George W. Bush. Now He Wants His Old Job.

*Jim Webb’s potential 2016 candidacy won’t keep Hillary up at night

*Virginia economist says state economy still lagging

*Gay marriage helps Virginia’s economy, McAuliffe says

*Our view: Gang rapes at UVa fraternities? (“Governor McAuliffe, stop whatever you’re doing right now. Pick up the phone and call the State Police.”)

*Tim Kaine “Horrified” by UVA Rape Story, Not Sure Frat Should Be Kicked Out

*Counsel tasked with investigating sexual assault policy was Phi Kappa Psi brother (Ever hear of “recusal?”)

*Anger, defiance mark Mountain Valley Pipeline meeting in Giles County

*Virginia Politics: Budget pressures still intense, Senate hears

*The Virginia Way, Part 6: Giving gifts, and gaining influence? (“Gifts have taken Virginia legislators far afield in recent years – to the Masters Tournament at Augusta National Golf Club, to Paris and even to Rabbit Lake, Saskatchewan.”)

*Area congressmen deeply divided on Obama’s immigration plan

*McAuliffe urges investigation after sexual assault allegations at U-Va. (“Va.’s governor said that he was ‘deeply disturbed’ by the account detailed in a Rolling Stone article.”)

*Democratic newcomer who almost ousted Dance says party cast her aside

*Norfolk schools need stability

*Virginia death row inmates challenge solitary confinement

*Prince William board approves enrollment boundaries

*Another daylong blast of artic air before welcome relief arrives

Video: President Obama addresses the nation on immigration (8 pm ET)

10

It’s utterly pathetic (and infuriating) that Republicans in the House have refused to even allow a freakin’ VOTE on the bipartisan Senate comprehensive immigration reform bill. If they HAD allowed a vote, it would have passed a long time ago. But noooo. Also keep in mind that most previous presidents, including the sainted Ronald Reagan, have issued executive orders on immigration, so there’s a lot of precedent for this (but you didn’t hear Republicans scream about Reagan, Bush, etc.). Finally, it’s long past time for somebody to address this issue, and I strongly support President Obama doing so, obviously within the bounds of his executive authority.

Brutal Rape at UVA

0

A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA by Sabrina Rubin Erdely

Rolling Stone Magazine published this article yesterday that is attracting quite a lot of attention about rape at UVA and the attempts to cover it up:

“University of Virginia thinks they’re above the law,” says UVA grad and victims-rights advocate Liz Seccuro. “They go to such lengths to protect themselves. There’s a national conversation about sexual assault, but nothing at UVA is changing.”

“Think about it,” says Susan Russell, whose UVA daughter’s sexual-assault report helped trigger a previous federal investigation. “In what world do you get kicked out for cheating, but if you rape someone, you can stay?

The governor and attorney general need to investigate this as well.

Read the complete article here:

http://www.rollingstone.com/cu…

Virginia News Headlines: Thursday Morning

4

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Thursday, November 20. That great photo (courtesy of the VA Sierra Club) is in connection with yesterday’s story, Hundreds Rally at Virginia State Capitol to Support EPA’s Clean Power Plan.

*Energy groups face ‘existential’ climate threat, says ex-BP chief

*Amazon Vows to Run on 100 Percent Renewable Energy (In addition to being non-polluting, it increasingly makes business/economic sense at this point.)

*President Obama to announce executive action on immigration Thursday (Meanwhile, the House could STILL allow the bipartisan Senate immigration bill to come to a vote. But nooooooo.)

*At Long Last, Immigration Action (Congress should have passed comprehensive immigration reform many years ago.)

*Republicans Were Fine With Bush Acting On Immigration Reform Without Congress (Of course they didn’t care when Republican presidents did it, just as they didn’t get all “outraged” by the huge deficits under Reagan and Bush, or the many, deadly attacks on U.S. embassies during Republican administrations. Clearly, for Republicans, it’s only wrong if it happens during a Democratic administration.)

*Whitbeck Enters Race For Virginia’s Top GOP Seat (Anti-Semitic “joke” dude.)

*Eric Cantor’s Former Crew Hangs a Shingle in Washington (“Washington’s revolving door spins again, with members of the former House Majority Leader’s staff opening a new lobbying firm.”)

*Jim Webb Launches 2016 Presidential Exploratory Committee (“The presidential race gets its first contender.”)

*The Virginia Way, Part 5: From making law to influencing it

*Controversial tobacco commission project doubles down on new approach

*New Roanoke County administrator tapped from Alexandria

*Our view: The “F” word (“Fracking” that is.)

*Giles County residents can ask questions, hear more about gas pipeline tonight

*Fracking amid a natural wonder (“The George Washington National Forest is federal land. It belongs to all Americans. The risk to a national treasure is simply too high.”)

*Virginia Beach mayor retains defense attorneys amid inquiry

*Streetcar’s demise will deepen divide between 2 Arlingtons(“Streetcar’s defeat sends message to less-affluent: Just keep riding the bus”

*Dashed streetcar plans spread uncertainty along Columbia Pike, Crystal City corridors (“Those who’ve wanted to update the aging Columbia Pike and Crystal City areas say the risks have increased.”)

*Public school enrollment jumps in Northern Virginia (“By 2018, a study finds, the area’s four counties will account for 40 percent of all enrollment in the state.”)

*Not as chilly today, but it won’t last. Cold returns tomorrow.

Jim Webb Announces Exploratory Committee for President

19

I’ll consider Webb if and ONLY if I hear him speak convincingly, knowledgeably and passionately about the planet’s environmental challenges – global warming being the top one – and what to do about them. So far, I haven’t heard anything from him on that, other than continued clinging to the dirtiest fossil fuel, coal.

Dear Friend,

            I’d like to take a few minutes of your time to ask you to consider the most important question facing America today: Is it possible that our next President could actually lay out a vision for the country, and create an environment where leaders from both parties and from all philosophies would feel compelled to work together for the good of the country, despite all of the money and political pressure that now demands they disagree?

As one who spent four years in the Reagan Administration but who served in the Senate as a Democrat, I believe it is possible. It is also necessary. We desperately need to fix our country, and to reinforce the values that have sustained us, many of which have fallen by the wayside in the nasty debates of the last several years. I hope you will consider joining me in that effort.

Over the past few months thousands of concerned Americans from across the political spectrum have urged me to run for President. A constant theme runs through these requests. Americans want positive, visionary leadership that they can trust, at a time when our country is facing historic challenges. They’re worried about the state of our economy, the fairness of our complicated multicultural society, the manner in which we are addressing foreign policy and national security challenges, and the divisive, paralyzed nature of our government itself. They’re worried about the future. They want solutions, not rhetoric.  

I share every one of these concerns. 

I have proudly spent several periods in government but I’m not a career politician. I come from a family of “citizen soldiers.” My father served 26 years in the Air Force as a pilot and a pioneer in our missile programs. I learned early about the sacrifices a family makes when a member is repeatedly deployed, and also the fulfillment that comes from serving our country. My brother, my son and I all became Marines. I fought as an infantry Marine on one of the Vietnam War’s harshest battlefields. After leaving the Marine Corps I studied law and found a fulfilling career as an author and journalist. But again and again I came back to the personal fulfillment that can only come from public service.  

I spent eight years on active duty in the military, four years as a committee counsel in the Congress working to help our veterans, five years in the Pentagon, one as a Marine and four as assistant secretary of defense and Secretary of the Navy. And I spent six years as a member of the United States Senate. Each time I served not with the expectation of making government a career, but to contribute to the good of the country during a period of crisis or great change.

In that spirit I have decided to launch an Exploratory Committee to examine whether I should run for President in 2016. I made this decision after reflecting on numerous political commentaries and listening to many knowledgeable people. I look forward to listening and talking with more people in the coming months as I decide whether or not to run.

A strong majority of Americans agree that we are at a serious crossroads. In my view the solutions are not simply political, but those of leadership. I learned long ago on the battlefields of Vietnam that in a crisis, there is no substitute for clear-eyed leadership. We are the greatest country on earth, overflowing with innovative thinkers. We need bold leadership that can tap into this talent, for the good of the country. We need people who will put the well-being of all of our citizens ahead of any special interest group, and who understand how to manage our complex federal system of government. 

Americans are a complicated and unique people. For nearly 250 years, we have been a beacon of hope throughout the world. We are a country founded not by conquest but by the guarantee of freedom. Our Constitution established a government not to protect the dominance of an aristocratic elite, but under the principle that there should be no permanent aristocracy, that every single American should have equal protection under the law, and a fair opportunity to achieve at the very highest levels. Throughout the world, our insistence on individual freedom and opportunity has been at the bottom of what people think when they hear the very word “American.”

We haven’t been perfect and from time to time, as with today, we have drifted to the fringes of allowing the very inequalities that our Constitution was supposed to prevent. Walk into some of our inner cities if you dare, and see the stagnation, poverty, crime, and lack of opportunity that still affects so many African Americans. Or travel to the Appalachian Mountains, where my own ancestors settled and whose cultural values I still share, and view the poorest counties in America – who happen to be more than 90 percent White, and who live in the reality that “if you’re poor and White you’re out of sight.”

The Democratic Party used to be the place where people like these could come not for a handout but for an honest handshake, good full-time jobs, quality education, health care they can afford, and the vital, overriding belief that we’re all in this together and the system is not rigged.

We can get there again. The American Dream does survive. I see it every day in the journey of my wife Hong, who at the age of seven escaped with her extended family on a fishing boat when the Communists took over South Vietnam in 1975. Not knowing whether they would live or die, they were rescued at sea by the United States Navy, taken to refugee camps in Guam and Arkansas, later moving to New Orleans. Hong began working at the age of eleven. She learned English – something her parents were never able to do – and through her own determination became a graduate of Cornell Law School. 

Everybody deserves that opportunity. In too many places it has been lost as our economy has changed its structural shape and whole communities have stagnated. But we can get it back again, for all of our people. And we must, for the greater good.

Forget the polls, the noise and the nasty TV ads. The challenge before us is far greater than the task of winning an election. It is how to govern, with foresight, fairness and administrative skill, once an election is over. We need to put our American house in order, to provide educational and working opportunities that meet the needs of the future, to rebuild our infrastructure and to reinforce our position as the economic engine and the greatest democracy on earth. We need to redefine and strengthen our national security obligations, while at the same time reducing ill-considered foreign ventures that have drained trillions from our economy and in some cases brought instability instead of deterrence.   

With enough financial support to conduct a first-class campaign, I have no doubt that we can put these issues squarely before the American people and gain their support. The 2016 election is two years away, but serious campaigning will begin very soon. The first primaries are about a year away. Your early support will be crucial as I evaluate whether we might overcome what many commentators see as nearly impossible odds. 

We are starting with very little funding and no full-time staff, but I’ve been here before. In February, 2006 I announced for the Senate only nine months before the election against an entrenched incumbent. We had no money and no staff. We were more than 30 points behind in the polls. I promised to work on the same themes I am putting before you now: reorient our national security policy, work toward true economic fairness and social justice, and demand good governance, including a proper balance between the Presidency and the Congress. We won. And despite the paralysis in our government, we delivered on these promises, in measurable, lasting ways.

In 2007, I gave the response to President Bush’s State of the Union address. I put economic fairness for our working people and small business owners at the front of my response, noting the immense and ever-growing disparities in income between corporate executives and those who do the hard work. When I graduated from college the average corporate CEO made twenty times what his workers made. Today that number is greater than 300 times. The inequalities between top and bottom in our country are greater than at any time in the last hundred years. And the disparities between those at the very top and the rest of our society have only grown larger since the economic crash of late 2008 and early 2009.

The stock market has nearly tripled during this so-called “recovery,” while ordinary income and loans to small business owners have actually decreased. I believe we can address these concerns while still supporting the American Dream of economic success for the risk-takers and visionaries who are at the forefront of the future. I’ve spent most of my professional life as a sole proprietor. I’ve lived under the load. We don’t need to overburden our economy with more government intrusion and additional piles of paperwork. We might begin by requiring an examination of all of the paperwork programs in our government. But we need to get going. And we need to fix these inequities in a fair way.

On my first day in the Senate I introduced a new GI Bill for those veterans who have served our country so faithfully and well since 9/11 – including my son, who left college and volunteered to fight as a Marine infantryman in Ramadi, Iraq, during some of the worst months of that war. I personally wrote this GI Bill along with legislative counsel. Within sixteen months we had guided the most important piece of veterans’ legislation since World War II through the Congress, gaining bipartisan support along the way. It is the best GI Bill in American history, covering a veteran’s tuition, books and fees and providing a monthly stipend. Today, more than a million Post- 9/11 veterans have been able to use it.

We also brought the need for criminal justice reform out of the shadows and into the national debate as a bipartisan issue of leadership rather than one of divisive politics. When we began this effort I was warned that it was political suicide to call for such reforms, but when others in the political process saw the support we received across philosophical lines, the need for criminal justice reform became a popular topic even for many conservative Republicans.  

As soon as I was elected we began calling for America to strongly reengage in East Asia, with a special focus on Japan, Korea, and the ten countries of ASEAN, particularly Vietnam, Thailand, Singapore and Burma. I’ve spent a lot of time in Asia over the years. We put this issue on the table two years before President Obama came to office and three years before his Administration announced what they called a “pivot” toward this vital region. We led this change in policy.

With respect to accountability in government, I partnered with Senator Claire McCaskill to pass legislation creating the Wartime Contracting Commission, identifying and fixing large-scale fraud, waste and abuse in government contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan. This Commission has been credited with identifying as much as 60 billion misspent dollars in those places, and creating a process through which future contracts would become fully accountable.

True leadership makes a difference. Results can be obtained, even in a paralyzed political environment, and in fact I believe we can un-paralyze the environment and re-establish a transparent, functioning governmental system in our country. I invite you to learn more about my positions at www.jameswebb.com.  I can assure you that we will be focusing not on petty politics or how to match a position with a poll, but on the future of our country and on solutions that will rebuild and unite us. In politics nobody owns me and I don’t owe anybody anything, except for the promise that I will work for the well-being of all Americans, and especially those who otherwise would have no voice in the corridors of power. All I ask is that you consider the record I am putting before you, and give me the opportunity to earn your trust.

Time is indeed of the essence. As I consider this effort I am asking that you support the exploratory committee with a donation and that you encourage other like-minded Americans to do the same. Visit our website at www.Webb2016.com to register your support. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you. Let’s fix our country. Together.

Hundreds Rally at Virginia State Capitol to Support EPA’s Clean Power Plan

5

According to Appalachian Voices: “More than 210,000 Virginians have spoken and they want the commonwealth to lead the new energy economy. Many of them are in Richmond this morning to urge legislators to grow Virginia’s economy, improve public health and address the cause of climate change by supporting the EPA’s Clean Power Plan.” (note: most photos courtesy of the VA Sierra Club)

Faith-Based, Public Health, Student and Environmental Groups Gather to Demand Climate Action

RICHMOND, VA – Today, over 200 Virginians from across the state gathered at the State Capitol to support government action to reduce carbon pollution, the leading cause of climate disruption and demand action to dramatically scale up clean energy in the Commonwealth.  Residents came from Hampton Roads, Williamsburg, Richmond, Blacksburg, Arlington and Manassas.

The rally followed a Joint Legislative Meeting of the Virginia House and Senate Commerce and Labor Committees on the Clean Power Plan. Supporters packed the hearing, carrying “Clean Energy Now” signs, and several made themselves heard during the public comment session before joining the crowd on the Capitol grounds, noting the economic benefits of clean energy as well as the urgency of addressing climate change.

The rally included a Mom’s Clean Air Force “Play-in” featuring parachute games and coloring activities, and a moment of silence for those affected by climate disruption followed by a “moment of noise” to sound the alarm on climate and demand action.

Speakers included:  Senator A. Donald McEachin, Senate Democratic Caucus Chairman; Clark Mercer, Chief of Staff to Lieutenant Governor Northam; Freeda Cathcart, Legislative Chair, General Federation of Women’s Clubs of Virginia – Blue Ridge Region; and Michael James-Deramo, Vice President of the VCU Environmental Coalition and representative of the Virginia Student Environmental Coalition.

“A comprehensive Clean Energy Plan will reap rewards for our families, for our communities and for the health and well-being of our Commonwealth,” said Senator McEachin. “We are very fortunate that instituting a Clean Energy Plan to help the environment will have the added benefit of saving citizens’ money and creating jobs. Altogether, it’s a win-win for Virginians.”

“Lieutenant Governor Northam supports the Clean Power Plan, and is pleased that the EPA’s goals allow Virginia the flexibility we need to develop a customized plan that will keep our energy affordable and reliable, while ensuring our children have clean air to breathe,” said Clark Mercer, Northam’s Chief of Staff.

“It’s time we started expanding opportunity and stopped shrinking the middle class by providing Virginians access to good-paying jobs while protecting our land for future generations,” said Cathcart, of the General Federation of Women’s Clubs of Virginia – Blue Ridge Region. “We must stop subsidizing harmful practices that contribute to extreme weather while destroying people’s livelihoods and start supporting clean energy jobs.”

Co-sponsoring organizations included:  350 Loudoun, Appalachian Voices, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Environment Virginia, Moms’ Clean Air Force, Mothers Against Pipelines, Preserve Floyd, Trinity Family Life Center, VCU Environmental Coalition, Virginia Conservation Network, Virginia Organizing, Virginia Sierra Club, Virginia Student Environmental Coalition and the William & Mary Environmental Coalition.

Interview with Former Diaspora CEO Yosem Companys; Featured in “More Awesome than Money” (Part 3)

1

I just finished reading the fascinating new book More Awesome Than Money: Four Boys and Their Heroic Quest to Save Your Privacy from Facebook by Pulitzer Prize winner and New York Times reporter Jim Dwyer. The Wall Street Journal describes the book as the efforts of “four idealists frustrated with Facebook’s control over our personal data…to create an alternative,” and why they didn’t ultimately succeed. Other than being a fascinating story, with drama and even tragedy (specifically, the suicide of brilliant, charismatic co-founder Ilya Zhitomirskiy), the book covers important issues facing all of us in the age of social media, the “cloud,” etc.: privacy, the digital “Panopticon,” the profit motive vs. creating something socially beneficial, how promising technologies do or don’t end up getting funding to move forward, implications for society, even human identity itself. I make absolutely no pretensions to being an expert on any of this, just someone interested in the subject. So, I asked my friend Yosem Companys — who teaches high-technology entrepreneurship at Stanford University, runs social media for Stanford’s Program on Liberation Technology, and previously worked as consiglieri and CEO of Diaspora (with a crucial role to play in “More Awesome than Money”) – whether he would be willing to answer a few questions. He graciously agreed. Here’s the interview, edited for conciseness and clarity. Note: I’ve decided, due to the interview’s length (16 questions and answers), to break it up into four parts. The first four questions and answers are available here, the second four questions and answers here. Now, here are #9-#12.

Question #9: There are lots of issues here. It seems that what these Diaspora founders undertook was daunting – to put it mildly.

Yosem Companys: Yeah, I mean, people forget that the guys were just kids, with Max, the oldest, about 22 at the time they started Diaspora. And, people also forget that the guys set out to create a summer project, then ended up with a business venture they did not ask for initially. Basically, the New York Times covered their efforts, and there was a huge pent-up need for the service, so they accidentally raised a ton of money on Kickstarter. But it’s incredibly complicated to put together a successful startup in this space, because Facebook is a large company with deep pockets, and, to succeed, one must successfully address a wide range of organizational and technical issues.

But I truly believe that, to build a new site that fixes the problems with privacy, you need to build a decentralized solution that uses a server-to-server open-source model and employs a privacy business-model. Even better, figure out how to make it encrypted without compromising speed. And, then, to grow it, you need to overcome the network effect either by building a killer app (an extremely difficult task, as you need a lot of luck to strike gold) or by building a HootSuite-like capability that allows people to remain in touch with their family and friends on other sites from your software. But the revolutionary part of all this is the decentralization, because that is what creates the technical means for users to control their data. Anything else that promises to be private, but that uses the old centralized approach, will simply recreate the problem that Facebook has, because the only difference between that and Facebook is a vague promise to privacy.

Question #10: What does the Diaspora experience tells us about privacy in the digital, social age we live in?

Yosem Companys: Unfortunately, it tells us that, until Snowden, there was not a whole lot of interest among investors to fix the privacy problem. So we were — and, for all effects and purposes, still are — living in a panopticon. Until we start building sites as I suggested above, or find new ways to do so such as adopting Doc Searls’ approach to vendor-relationship management , any new site that is built will simply reinforce the panopticon, because someone could spy on you, whether that someone is the site’s programmers, the government, malicious hackers, or another party. You will never be fully protected, of course, as control and encryption do not prevent infiltration and human error, such as your inadvertently revealing your password to someone else. But, if we started building sites differently, we would be much better off.

One interesting thing we have not talked about is that geographic location matters, as the government can throw you in jail if you refuse to hand over your users’ data, whereas some locations are more privacy friendly (for example, Switzerland or Iceland — see here for instance). Germany has also legally enshrined a degree of protection for privacy. Culturally speaking, in general, Europeans have a greater privacy sensitivity than Americans.

Question #11: After reading the book, I came across articles, like ISIS Finally Finds a Social Network That Can’t Suspend Their Accounts, about terrorists using Diaspora.  I don’t know about you, but I find that disturbing. The fact is, technology – whether centralized, decentralized, top-down, bottom-up, whatever – can be used by humans for good or ill. But would you say that the very nature of Diaspora opens it up more to truly bad actors – ISIS, criminal enterprises of all sorts – than a network with “gatekeepers” like Facebook?

Yosem Companys: By being decentralized and an open-source software that anyone could use, there’s no question that Diaspora opens itself up to all sorts of bad actors using the site, including terrorists. But there is nothing Diaspora can do about that, because the Jihadists are using Diaspora’s free software on their own servers, and Diaspora has no control over who uses their software and on what server. That, in and of itself, shows you the disruptive potential of Diaspora’s model.

It may be disturbing, but it’s the way our world works. Technologies are just tools that can be used for good or ill, depending on the values of their designers and users. For example, Ford makes and sells cars to everybody, and a terrorist could buy one and strap a bomb to it to conduct a terrorist attack. But that’s not Ford’s fault. It’s up to law-enforcement agencies to track down the bad guys. And there are a number of instruments, such as warrants, that law-enforcement agencies can use to get access to personal data when they suspect users are doing bad things. In society, we need both privacy and security. The idea that they are in opposition to each other is wrong. But finding the ideal way to preserve both is tricky.

Question #12: Do you believe the Diaspora experience tells us anything about human identity in the digital/social age we live in?

Yosem Companys: One of the most interesting things we observed among Diaspora’s users in terms of identity was that they preferred to craft their own. Unfortunately, writing computer code entails creating a set of abstract instructions that spell out all the things that users can do on a given site. These design decisions also necessarily restrict what users can do, because what users can do conflicts with other things they want to do, or because the designer could not imagine or was simply not aware that the user wanted to do it, or because giving too many user options would overwhelm the user. Thus, almost by definition, your identity can only be that which the developers conceive of and code for you.

One simple example will drive the point home: When we were working on Diaspora, all major sites we knew of required that you fill out the gender field as a dichotomous menu of either male or female. Thanks to Sarah Mei, we left the gender field blank, which became a huge hit in the LGBT community and made us look quite progressive, something for which we were both criticized and lauded.

The point here is that designers rarely spend time thinking about how their own values either strategically or inadvertently influence how users are allowed to express their identities online. That is something that MySpace did quite well when they accidentally allowed users to select their own wallpaper, something that became wildly popular with users but that the developers later explained was as a result of a glitch in the code and debated extensively whether to keep it. Also, there is an extensive literature in a number of fields (e.g., sociology of technology, history of technology, communication science, information science, and human-computer interaction) on how design values influence user behavior, but most developers are rarely exposed to this literature, so they are unaware of how their values and programming practices influence their code.

Instead, they typically start with the mathematical assumption that designing a “beautiful” algorithm reveals some objective truth about the world, forgetting that they themselves are subjectively deciding what that algorithm should look like and what users are allowed to do or not to do.

Three Graphs from New GMU/Yale Survey Show Overwhelming Support for Climate Action, Clean Energy

1

( – promoted by lowkell)

Cross posted from Scaling Green. For Blue Virginia readers, I’d just point out that yet again, progressives and environmentalists are strongly in the majority on the issues.

A new survey from George Mason University’s Center for Climate Change Communication and Yale’s Project on Climate Change Communication has some encouraging results about U.S. public opinion on climate change and clean energy. Here are three graphs we thought were well worth sharing  The key points are: 1) 67% of Americans support what is, essentially, the EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan to limit carbon pollution from existing, coal-fired power plants; 2) Americans overwhelmingly support policies – like Renewable Portfolio Standards, R&D, tax rebates – to promote clean energy; and 3) only 16% of Americans actively refuse to believe the science on climate change. Now, we just need policymakers to translate the wishes of the American people into action.



A Few of My “Favorite” Fundraising Emails from the Foust Campaign

5

Over at Daily Kos, they’re mocking DCCC head Steve Israel for claiming, “You can’t be going out there and telling people that the sky is falling. It tends to hurt recruiting and fundraising.” Why is that mockable? Simple: because “this is the very same committee that sent all those DOOM emails.”

Let’s look at a local campaign, right here in Virginia – some of the “best” of the DOOOOM emails from the Foust for Congress campaign. While you’re reading these, I’d consider a few questions: 1) does any of this make the candidate look in the least bit dignified?; 2) does any of this really raise more money than simply sending out hard-hitting messages, without the doom-and-gloom, over-the-top, cringe-inducing idiocy?; and 3) is there any chance that a constant drumbeat of doom and gloom might – just might – cause Democrats to get depressed, discouraged, and to be less likely to volunteer and/or vote (or, as DCCC Chair Steve Israel said, “hurt recruiting and fundraising”)? Hmmmm.

With that, here are some of my “favorite” emails from the Foust campaign. Enjoy?

Date: June 10

Subject: “crushing blow”

Key line: “Everyone from Paul Ryan to the Koch brothers have gone ALL-IN to defeat John and buy this election for Barbara Comstock. That would be a crushing blow for Northern Virginia families.”

Comment: Setting a positive tone for the uncounted doom-and-gloom, hysteria-inducing emails to follow.

Date: June 18

Subject: “doomed”

Key line: “If we don’t act fast, John’s chances of winning could be doomed from the start”

Comment: That was generally the theme for the entire campaign, that they were “doomed” if we didn’t send $5 right away. Kinda like one of those “Nigerian prince” scam emails.

Date: July 16

Subject: “HUGE NEWS:”

Key line: “We OUTRAISED Barbara Comstock!”

Comment: Of course, a lot of that money came from Foust himself, and most of it ended up being wasted on super-expensive, extremely-low-bang-for-the-buck broadcast TV ads. But still…oh forget it.

Date: July 31

Subject: “crippled”

Key line: “If left unanswered, these ads will cripple us. We can’t let that happen.”

Comment: Actually, failing to define Comstock in the spring, when they had a chance, making huge unforced errors like the “real job” comment (then not immediately apologizing and stating clearly what he meant) “crippled” this campaign a lot worse than any TV ads.

Date: August 16

Subject: “Virginia, this is INFURIATING”

Key line: “Boehner’s lackeys just launched a phony news site called “Loudoun Update” to spread lies about John’s record.”

Comment: So…why are they calling me Virginia? Seriously, though, not sure why the email’s addressed to the entire state as opposed to the 10th district, and also why they’d want to make a big deal out of such a “nothing burger,” but anything to get people upset/angry so they donate $5.00.

Date: September 9

Subject: “Fwd: kiss all hope goodbye”

Key line: “If we can hit ONE THOUSAND donations before the Ryan fundraiser, it’ll be HUGE victory for us and a CRUSHING blow for Ryan.”

Comment: My god.

Date: September 19

Subject: “LOUDON COUNTY TIMES”

Key line: “Your Support: $5.00”

Comment: I included this one for two reasons. First, they spelled the name of a key county in the district wrong (should be L-O-U-D-O-U-N). Second, they always asked for $5.00, warning that if they didn’t get that $5.00, they were “doomed.” Uh huh.

Date: September 21

Subject: “lost for good”

Key line: “Speaker Boehner’s attack ads begin NEXT WEEK. If we’re not prepared, our chance to turn Northern Virginia blue could be lost for good.”

Comment: I’m not sure there ever were attack ads specifically from Speaker Boehner, but they were right about one thing — that race was “lost for good” (but not because we didn’t give them $5.00 – lol).

Date: September 22

Subject: “HUMILIATING defeat”

Key line: “We can get back on track — and hand Boehner a humiliating defeat — but only if every Democrat reading this email steps up for John before tomorrow’s critical ad buy deadline.”

Comment: Time for another $5.00 – or we’re DOOOOOMED I tell you!

Date: October 10

Subject: “Fwd: E-M-E-R-G-E-N-C-Y”

Key line: “Lowell — we’re still $931 short of our ad buy goal. this is an emergency. please see below:”

Comment: How can it be an “E-M-E-R-G-E-N-C-Y” when it’s already “lost for good?” Just sayin’. 😉

Date: October 17

Subject: “!!! STUNNING comeback !!!”

Key line: “NOW: as of 7pm, we’re within range of an INCREDIBLE 5,OOO online donations — JUST IN OCTOBER !!!…If we can hit this mark by midnight, it’ll be a STUNNING comeback for us.”

Comment: Note that this was just under two weeks before Foust lost by 16 points to Comstock. So much for the “stunning comeback.” LOL

Date: October 20

Subject: “Fwd: It’s done. It’s over. Go home.”

Key line: “So we’re out of options. Either we all chip in what we can, when we can — or we pack up, go home, and call it a day.”

Comment: I believe this cringe-inducing email leads naturally to the next cringe-inducing email.

Date: October 23

Subject: “re: Washington Post: [just announced]”

Key line: “my team’s in a full blown panic. i’m not quite there — yet. But I need your help. -John”

Comment: How dignified.

Date: November 2

Subject: “GREAT new poll”

Key line: “A brand new poll shows Democrats trailing Republicans by just 1 point in Virginia’s 10th district.”

Comment: That “poll” actually was a total joke, didn’t poll Foust vs. Comstock per se, and was a wild outlier regardless. Two days later, Foust lost by 16 points. I guess they saved the “best” email for last. LOL