Home Blog Page 2065

Letting Money Buy Power Corrupts Our Money System, Too

3

This piece appeared recently in the Richmond Times Dispatch.

In its opinion in Citizens United, the Republican-appointed Supreme Court majority pretended it wasn’t true. But every sane person knows otherwise: allowing unlimited money to flow into our election process corrupts our democracy. “One person, one vote” gets replaced by “one dollar, one vote,” which means that the increasing inequalities of wealth in America subvert the democratic idea of equality of political voice among all citizens.

But less obviously, allowing money to buy political power corrupts not only the political system, but the money system as well.

I used to call out the Koch Brothers, for their campaign to misinform the public about climate change, as being not only immoral but also a kind of crazy. What kind of insanity is it, I asked, for billionaires who already have more money than they and their children and their grandchildren could spend in a lifetime, to damage the future for generations to come, and for life on earth generally, just to get still more money for themselves?

I was thinking of money as something that entitles the owner to get economic goods. And for billionaires like the Koch Brothers, the limit to the goodies they might benefit from consuming or owning has long since been passed.

But in a political system like the one being fashioned by things like the Citizens United  decision, money isn’t about acquiring economic goods in the pursuit of happiness. It is about buying the government in the pursuit of power.

The heart of the matter is this: economic expansion can be synergistic, a process in which everyone gains; but power is a zero-sum game, meaning that there’s only so much to go around, and so one person’s gain is necessarily offset by someone else’s loss.

To put it another way: we can all get richer together, but we can’t all get more powerful together.

So letting money buy power removes all barriers to greed, because what looks at first like insatiable greed can really be an insatiable lust for power.

The Koch Brothers’ sacrifice of the future of our planet for their own enrichment no longer looks crazy and despicably immoral. It now looks just despicably immoral.

But it’s not only the Koch Brothers conduct that can be warped by this undemocratic translatability of money into power over the American government.

The American economy worked great, a half century ago, when the CEOs of our corporations earned some 20-40 times as much as the workers on the shop floor. Now they earn 200-400 times as much, and the economy is not working as well.

Inequalities of income and wealth have expanded hugely in recent times. It’s well established that great economic inequality hobbles economic growth.  The flow of money to the rich doesn’t create nearly as much demand for more goods and services as money going to average families, because it is those with less who need to spend more of what they get. Funneling more money to the rich and hollowing out the middle class thus leads to a more sluggish economy.

It used to be that as the productivity of American workers increased, their wages would increase proportionally. But over the past decade and a half workers, have stopped getting their share of the gains of that productivity growth, and all the gains have gone instead into corporate profits.

But that channeling into corporate coffers of all the economic gains has helped keep our economy in the ditch. Corporations have been slow to invest or produce more because they see there’s no demand for such extra production. The demand in our economy is weak – and the lack of aggregate demand is why our recovery has been so slow – because average American families are not getting their fair share of the bounty they help to produce.

So this pursuit of more and more wealth by those individuals and corporations who already have enormous riches is a major impediment to restoring America’s economic health.

But while the present flow of money to the haves from the have-nots makes no economic sense – let alone no sense in terms of our values of fairness for average people and concern about their well-being-it makes more sense the more that money is allowed to buy control over the government of the United States.

Greed and the lust for power have been able to combine forces, thanks to the advance of plutocracy abetted by Supreme Court decisions like Citizens United. They make a deadly combination.

Not only does this deadly mix corrode the democratic values embedded in the political system our founders bequeathed us. But they also corrupt and damage our once-dynamic economy.

Grist’s Ben Adler: Jim Webb “sucks on climate change”

3

Former Marine, Senator Jim Webb (D-VA)Former Secretary of the Navy, Former Virginia Senator Jim Webb is the first out of the box for the 2016 Democratic Party Presidential nomination hunt.  This announcement has garnered its attention and analysis. (For example, over at DailyKos, Markos has a biting (and to me, generally accurate) review of Webb’s announcement video in the context of Democratic Party primary politics and TeacherKen put up a sympathetic reflection on Jim Webb.)  And, some attention is turning to Webb’s positions on policy arenas.

While Webb is far from the stage of having formal policy issue statements, he does have a record of action and statements to examine.  Over at Grist, Ben Adler put up a searing review of Jim Webb and climate/environmental issues:

…in the Senate, Webb was a “climate curmudgeon,” [who worked to undermine Presidential authority to negotiate climate treaties, fought against the Environmental Protection Agency, etc.]…And on climate change, by far the most monumental environmental issue, Webb may be little better than the Republican Party to which he once belonged.

During his Senate term, Webb:

As Kate Sheppard put it,

Webb has emerged as a major pain in the ass for Democratic leaders on climate issues

As Ben Adler put it,

it’s a problem that Webb sucks on climate change. The next president has to be a climate hawk. We’re rapidly running out of time to stave off the worst effects of warming.

As many others did — especially members of the Raising Kaine ‘community’ — I worked to get Webb elected.  On my own dime, for example, I created and printed several thousand copies of a two pager outlining Webb’s biography and why he merited support/being elected. It was a positive biography message that I distributed from ‘Draft Webb’ timeframe into the general election.  When flying out of Dulles, for example, I would arrive an hour early and put this on 100s of cars in the parking lot (believe that this totaled more than 5000). And …

Jim Webb was a wonderful option compared to George Allen.

He is a brilliant writer. He has served his nation. And, his intellect can be engaging. And, I do believe that he is principled.  And ….

One of the main reasons that I felt comfortable (even compelled) to take my time to help elect Jim Webb was my respect for his intellect and a belief that he would be open minded to listen and assimilate information about issues where he had focused little attention in the past — such as energy and climate.

However …

He did not just disappoint me as my Senator but I felt betrayed.

On energy & environmental issues, he was — and remains — arrogantly oblivious to the serious challenges we face and the opportunities before us.  

Where is he on Keystone XL?  Where is he on fracking? On the Environmental Protection Agency? On …

While Jim Webb was a marvelous option compared to Allen and would be far better than anyone I expect that the Republican Party will nominate, it is hard to imagine that he will be the best option in the Democratic Party primary.

There is no way that he merits our support for the Democratic nomination without his showing a serious reevaluation of his perspective and objectives on environmental and energy issues.

That is — hard to imagine unless he makes a meaningfully significant effort to educate himself re climate change (and the scientific consensus on climate change), its implications for America and Americans, and the very real benefits that can accrue to US (to all of us) from serious climate action.

I do believe that Jim Webb has the intellectual What it means to be a leader by Senator Jim Webbcapacity and honesty to be able to learn from actual experts, assimilate what he learns, and come to a substantive understanding of climate change/climate disruption/climate chaos risks and the very real opportunities that can come from climate change mitigation (related) investments.

As to that last item, addressing climate change offers some of the most fruitful paths to address core Webb issues of economic equity (advocates of cap & dividend lay out how it will strengthen the middle class), creation and maintenance of good quality jobs for Americans, strengthening the economy (for all), national security (including improving the effectiveness of Marines in combat zones), etc …

Jim Webb certainly has the capacity to learn and assimilate such material into his Weltanschauung and to become a leader to bring America toward a sensible energy and climate policy. Sadly, he has shown no indication of a willingness to do so to date to me and others.  As Lowell Feld put it,

Sadly (and it truly is sad for me, as someone who led the “Draft James Webb” effort and who worked for his campaign), it doesn’t seem that he has much if any understanding – or even curiosity to learn – about energy and environmental issues.

We simply cannot afford to have a President who is indifferent to climate change issues and is against the very basic concepts of the necessity and value of environmental regulations.

Virginia News Headlines: Saturday Morning

5

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, November 22. Also see President Obama’s weekly address, on immigration reform. Key point: if the House had allowed a vote on the bipartisan Senate immigration bill at any time over the past 1 1/2 years, it would have passed and been signed into law. Meanwhile, President Obama is taking action under his lawful executive authority to fix the broken system we have now.

*Republicans challenge Obama’s executive actions, file lawsuit over Obamacare (What a joke.)

*Mr. Obama’s Wise Immigration Plan (“The initiative is a good start, bringing reasons for encouragement, tempered with caution.”)

*President Obama Acted Unilaterally on Immigration and the Right Is Predictably Outraged

*Lack of immigration plan flusters GOP (“Party dithers while Obama pounds message defending action.”)

*Peggy Noonan’s “wisdom”: Build Keystone XL so American boys will become men (“America’s worst pundit wants to build Keystone XL so we can impress the world and build character in wayward youths.” Wow. She gets PAID to write this dreck?)

*Amid Attacks, Obama Urges Action on Immigration

*How much would Jim Webb’s military background help in a White House run?

*Jim Webb sucks on climate change (Worst of all, he basically is silent about the #1 issue facing humanity)

*Virginia’s Ken Cuccinelli on immigration lawsuit: ‘Take it slow’ (Laughable Cooch comment du jour: “This shouldn’t be done as a political undertaking” – yeah right!)

*Our view: Tone deaf to “rape school” allegations (“So when the university does hire outside counsel, who does it hire? Someone connected to the same fraternity where it’s alleged an initiation rite is to rape somebody! What did the university know about Filip’s resume and when did it know it?”)

*Controversy swells at UVa as Filip taken off the job and Sullivan heads back to the U.S.

*UVa independent counsel on sexual assaults dropped (This attorney, Mark Filip, should never have taken the job, given his enormous conflict of interest.)

*U-Va. campus addresses sexual-assault allegations in Rolling Stone article

*Hampton U: Discarded poll showed Warner with double-digit lead (Why are these Virginia college polls – Roanoke College, CNU, Hampton U – so awful, when other states have excellent polls done by colleges and universities? Weird.)

*Virginia Politics: Ethics issues likely to be General Assembly focus

*The Virginia Way, Part 7: Networking and career-building in the Capitol (“Sometimes, spending time in the lush green of Capitol Square – or even leaving it – isn’t such a bad deal for Virginia’s part-time legislators.”)

*Gov. McAuliffe, Virginia first lady kick off child hunger effort in state

*Brat: ‘Not one thin dime’ for Obama’s immigration plan (But will he vote to pass the bipartisan Senate immigration bill? Of course not. Just “no” “no” “no” “no”…)

*Hits and misses: Reasons to cheer the Elizabeth (“The contamination of the Elizabeth River through decades of industrial pollution was so terrible, so suffocating, 20 years ago that the waterway and its branches were all but given up for dead.”)

*Double duty: Portsmouth politics sees influx of clergy members

*In Richmond area, immigrants view Obama plans with cautious optimism

*Warm-up begins, but don’t put away heavy sweaters and coats just yet

Zero-Sum Politics

0

Washington politics are a zero sum game. When one branch gains power, others lose. For example, in the middle of the last century, Congress proved itself unable to deal with civil rights. The Supreme Court eventually stepped in. Congressmen howled about “judicial overreach and activism;” to no avail. With decisions on one-man-one-vote, abortion, equal access to public facilities and right to counsel, the Supreme Court gained power at Congress’ expense.

In our own era, Americans have witnessed a dysfunctional immigration system for decades. Self-weakened through filibustered gridlock, Congress did nothing. It was inevitable that one or both of the other branches of government would eventually move into the vacuum.

Far from castigating President Obama for making immigration law through executive action, Congress has only itself to blame. Under our system of zero-sum government, when one branch fails the others will step up. Further inaction due to Republican-led gridlock will inevitably weaken Congress while strengthening the President.

Such strengthening could, of course, get out of hand. For this reason alone, Congress must reject its zealots and return to producing compromise solutions to vexing national problems. Among the problems on Congress’ plate are unequal tax treatment, political influence spending, and gerrymandering, among others. If Congress fails to act, more Executive Orders and Supreme Court decisions will fill the void.

Former Hampton GOP official arrested for impersonating a cop

0

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/201…

The former head of the local Republican Party in Hampton, Virginia was arrested on Wednesday for allegedly searching a local couple under the pretense of being a police officer.  

Authorities charged 27-year-old Kyle P. Adams with two counts apiece of abduction, impersonating a police officer and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony for the incident on Tuesday night. He allegedly “detained” a 33-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman in Norfolk before leaving the scene in a black SUV. No one was injured, but Adams reportedly had a firearm at the time of his illegal search.

Here’s the local newspaper story:

http://www.dailypress.com/news…

In 2012 he entered an Alford plea after being charged with embezzlement.

Why am I not surprised he’s a Republican?

BENGHAZEEEEGRUBER – Breath – EBOLAAMNESTYTYRANNY!!!!!!

1

So, now that the Republican-controlled House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has TOTALLY debunked all the right wingnuts’ conspiracy theories on BENGHAZEEEEEE, what do they have left? First, a few quick points from the report on Benghazi by (again) Republican-controlled House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. (attention Frank Wolf and other crazy conspiracy theorists, you might want to read this, as it is meant to be the “definitive House statement on the Intelligence Community’s activities before, during and after the tragic events that caused the deaths of four brave Americans”)

*”There is no evidence of an intelligence failure…CIA provided sufficient security personnel, resources, and equipment to defend against the known terrorist threat and to enable CIA operations in Benghazi…no evidence that the CIA turned down requests for additional security resources at the Annex.”

*”…the Committee found no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support.”

*”…the Committee found no evidence that any officer was intimidated, wrongly forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement or otherwise kept from speaking to Congress, or polygraphed because of their presence in Benghazi.”

*”Appropriate personnel on the ground in Benghazi made the decision to send CIA officers to rescue the State Department officers at the TMF…no officer at CIA was ever told to stand down.

*”The decision to send CIA officers from Tripoli to Benghazi to rescue the Ambassador and bolster security of the U.S. personnel in Benghazi was a tactical decision appropriately made by the senior officers on the ground.”

*”The CIA received all military support that was available. One CIA security officer requested a Spectre gunship that he believed was available, but his commanding officer did not relay the request because he correctly knew the the gunship was not available.”

*”…intelligence assessments continue to evolve to this day, and the investigations into the motivations of the individual attackers are still ongoing.”

*”For her public comments, Ambassador Rice used talking points developed at the request of HPSCI.”

*The “CIA, NCTC, FBI and other Executive Branch agencies fully cooperated with the Committee’s investigation.”

In sum, basically none of the charges leveled in the aftermath of Benghazi by Republicans have proven to be correct. Just as most of us outside the Fox/Rush/Glenn right-wing news bubble figured all along. I just wish the Republican-controlled House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hadn’t dumped this report late on a Friday before Thanksgiving, clearly hoping that it would get as little attention as possible. Of course, if the media were responsible, they would give this report as much (or more) attention as they gave to the hysterical, false accusations hurled around by the likes of Mitt Romney, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Frank Wolf, etc. in the aftermath of this tragedy. Oh, and we’re also “all ears” for apologies from Romney, McCain, Graham, Wolf et al. Nope, not holding our breaths…

Anyway, now that the BENGHAZEEEEE conspiracy theories have been definitively debunked, by Republicans no less, what will the next crazy conspiracy theory by the frothing-at-the-mouth right wing be?  Well, there’s always one of the people Mitt Romney went out of his way to praise for helping develop “Romneycare,” Jonathan Gruber, an MIT academic who apparently thinks everyone other than himself is an idiot (but why any of us should care what he thinks is beyond me). Then there’s Ebola, of course, but that’s so three weeks ago!  Then there’s the latest OUTRAGE — amnesty! tyranny! can we go back to birth cerficates or “death panels?” 😉 I mean, Fox, Rush, Glenn, etc, have to have SOMETHING to rant about, right?

I’m Still Amazed the Gillespie Campaign Didn’t Use This Material from Dick Saslaw

4

This audio of Democratic State Senate leader Dick Saslaw being interviewed on the John Fredericks Show was posted back in mid October, but I decided not to write about it at the time. Why not? Simple: because, after talking to Virginia Democratic politicos I respected, I decided it would only be damaging to Mark Warner’s campaign against Ed Gillespie. Of course, I figured that whether I talked about it or not, the Gillespie folks would use it anyway (as did some of the top Dem politicos I spoke with), but still, I didn’t want to “go there.” Now, with the election over, we can all listen to Dick Saslaw as he talks and talks and talks about stuff he shouldn’t have been talking about at that time, or really ever, regarding details of the Phil Puckett scandal. For instance.

*Saslaw states that “the governor called me on Friday at about 6:30, 7….and told me that he had just found out that Phil was going to resign…of course I was a little shocked.” So, right there, he drags Gov. McAuliffe into the thick of things, which contradicts (never believable) stories that it was some sort of rogue operation by Chief of Staff Paul Reagan (Saslaw says it wasn’t a good idea for Reagan to have left a voice mail).

*Saslaw adds: “I then immediately called and left a message with Mark Warner.” Yep, he drags Mark Warner into it as well, in the final weeks of a campaign in which the Gillespie folks were hitting Warner hard on the Puckett scandal. Brilliant.

*Saslaw keeps on talking: “and then I called…spoke to Tim Kaine’s Chief of Staff Mike Henry, and told him, said look, can you have Tim call and find out what’s going on….I basically left the same message with Senator Warner.” Going for the trifecta, apparently, Saslaw then drags Tim Kaine’s office into it, while for good measure also noting that he asked Mark Warner to call Puckett.

*Reveals that “Mark [Warner] called me on Sunday and…said…he had talked to one of the family members…said it was too late, that Phil had already resigned.” The question is, why did Saslaw feel the need to go on conservative radio and spew this stuff? Got me, other than he loves hearing himself talk, has zero message discipline and zero sense of political strategy.

Anywway, I’m still baffled as to why the Gillespie campaign didn’t use this audio in an ad. At the time it came out in October, I asked one of the Virginia Democratic politicos I most respect if they would have used this in an ad if the shoe had been on the other foot, and the answer was “absolutely yes!” So yeah, seemed like a “no brainer” at the time, but for whatever reason, the Gillespie folks didn’t run with it.

More on the “flip”

A few more details from this interview that Saslaw really shouldn’t have been talking about publicly, let alone a couple weeks before an important election: 1) his views on the legality of the whole Puckett situation, given that was (is?) being investigated by the FBI (he keeps saying he’s “not an attorney,” so not sure what he bases his fine legal analysis on); 2) his own “shock” that Puckett would be resigning (uh…you were the Majority Leader and you were the last to know about this?); 3) his prediction that Mark Warner would win by at least 8-10 points, which turned out to be both WILDLY wrong, but more importantly was also a dumb thing to say, as it contributed to complacency in the “base,” at a time when supposedly Warner’s internals showed it tightening to the low single digits and the goal should have been to communicate to the base that they really needed to door knock, phone bank, and of course vote; 4) his comments that if John Foust “didn’t win it now…he should run again in 2016” (uhhh…we’ll see about that, but given Foust’s 16-point loss, something tells me that’s not likely to be automatic by any means); 5) his prediction that Barbara Comstock would probably win this year (correct prediction, but should the Senate Democratic leader be saying that publicly a couple weeks before the freakin’ election? Uhhhh….I don’t think so!).

Anyway, the bottom line is that when Dick Saslaw opens his mouth, all kinds of “interesting” stuff comes out (e.g., see Video: In Crude Language, Sen. Dick Saslaw Argues that Ethics Laws are Irrelevant, Unnecessary and Sometimes the elevators have ears, Senator, just for a couple examples out of many. So..how much longer do we have to wait until we can get a new Senate Democratic leader?

P.S. Of course, this is the same guy who utterly despises his “base” and anything “progressive,” thinks the answer for Democrats to move to the right, etc. In short, he’s not the brightest bulb.

Video: John Vihstadt Lies and Dodges His Way Through the Kojo Nnamdi Show

13

I just got done watching Arlington County Board member John Vihstadt (Republican; not sure why the media keeps calling him “independent,” since that’s just a big charade) on the Kojo Nnamdi Show. I was hoping they’d really tear apart this guy’s bogus anti-streetcar, pro-BRT arguments, or at least expose him as a world class b.s.’er. Prior to the show, David Alpert of Greater Greater Washington had encouraged Kojo Nnamdi and Tom Sherwood to ask Vihstadt:

*”What is @voteforvihstadt  going to do now to ensure that good transit does get built on Columbia Pike?”

*”And if he says ‘BRT,’ please remind him that the leading BRT organization defines BRT as requiring a bus lane…Which VDOT has said isn’t allowed on Columbia Pike. So I’d like to hear his view of actually possible transit.”

In the interview, which begins at around 33:40 of the video, Vihstadt basically just lies, misrepresents and dodges his way around the questions. The guy’s certainly a good talker, no doubt about that. The problem is, his torrent of words basically just amounts to meaningless “blah blah blah blah,” because none of it adds up or makes any sense the minute you look into it. For instance, Vihstadt claims that his campaign was all about putting an emphasis back on “core services.” The problems that he doesn’t mention, of course, are: a) the streetcar funding was “dedicated,” much of it from the state, none of it from Arlington residents having to pay more taxes, and not in any way “fungible” with education or anything else; and b) by killing the streetcar project, Vihstadt and his merry band of naysayers just killed $3.2-$4.4 BILLION (that’s right, “billion” with a “b”) in funding that could have gone to…wait for it…that’s right, “CORE SERVICES!” Brilliant, huh?

Vihstadt then goes on to simply outright lie, claiming that we can have “Bus Rapid Transit” (BRT) on Columbia Pike, and that this election supposedly wasn’t a choice “between a streetcar and doing nothing.” Except that Vihstadt’s alternative to a streetcar, BRT, is not possible, for a variety of reasons.  As Greater Greater Washington explained yesterday, the “Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) turned [Columbia Pike] over to Arlington, but with the condition that the number of lanes open to cars not drop below four-and it’s a four-lane road.” Ergo, no dedicated lane. The problem, of course, as GGW further points out (and that many of us have pointed out for years now), is that real BRT is not possible without a dedicated lane. Period. To the contrary, real BRT requires a dedicated lane, by definition. Details, details.

Also note how, when Vihstadt is called out on his b.s. about BRT, he simply dodges by attacking the idea of putting a streetcar on a road without a dedicated lane. Vihstadt actually has the chutzpah (or cojones if you prefer) to claim that the absence of a dedicated lane is a greater problem for a streetcar than BRT. Uhhhhh…okey dokey then. Again, this really isn’t that complicated: you simply can not have BRT, by definition, without a dedicated lane. End of story. As for a streetcar system, you absolutely CAN have one without a dedicated lane, and it CAN work fine, although obviously in a perfect world it would be great to have dedicated lane(s) for streetcar. But again, that’s just a distraction from the core point here, which is that you can’t have BRT on Columbia Pike. The fact that this is such a simple concept really makes you wonder whehter Vihstadt’s just willfully refusing to acknowledge the fact that he’s wildly wrong on this.

The bottom line is that Vihstadt and company, through their antics over the past couple years, have severely harmed the future of Arlington County. At a time when we desperately need to be investing in our future, diversifying our economy, and working to compete with new job centers like Tysons, DC, etc., Vihstadt et al have just made all that significantly more difficult. Why? Because projects like the Columbia Pike streetcar system would have been, and still should be, a crucial part of a strategy aimed at making Arlington a more attractive place for business and residents to locate and to spend their hard-earned dollars on a variety of services. By killing the streetcar, with no serious alternative — e.g., as GGW points out, “no transit experts have really said [that meeting ridership needs on Columbia Pike using “articulated buses”] holds water” — Vihstadt et al have now led us down one of two paths, neither of which are in any way good for the county:

1. “Columbia Pike will not grow as leaders and residents hope, in which case it will remain depressed relative to the rest of the county and not need more transit ridership. A streetcar might become necessary to jump-start the economy, or voters will keep letting it languish.”

2. “It will grow, demand will increase again, and we’ll be back where we started. Maybe the county will again consider a higher-capacity streetcar, just years later and at an even higher cost.”

The question is, why would anyone have voted for a candidate leading Arlington down such a dark, blind alley? That’s what I really can’t figure out.

John Boehner and the horse he rode in on

0

CNN says John “Tan-In-A-Can” Boner announced he is suing President Obama over his dictatorial ways in implementing the ACA.

**** him and the horse he rode in on.

That seals it.  Please don’t anyone tell me about the decent Republicans out there — there are not any.  The entire GOP is a hate-filled, insane, foaming-at-the-mouth lynch mob of mad dogs — including the sweet little old lady who lives down the road from me and votes Republican.  Low-information sonsabitches whose news comes from Fox and who fundamentally hate Obama because of his skin color.

Yet, I haven’t found any Democrats willing to stand up and speak the truth about the GOTP.

End of rant.

Anger, Defiance in Giles County

2

Shit hit the proverbial fan in Giles County during a meeting last night to discuss the Mountain Valley pipeline, which will be built right through Giles County.  

300 people showed up at the meeting and a number of these folks showed up and voiced their outrage over the pipeline –  but the one thing never mentioned by these same people was their views on fracking, and that is a big part of this equation.

A pipeline is a direct results of fracking.  If there was no fracking, there would be no need for these types of pipelines.  I adamantly opposed to fracking and these pipelines, but most GOP voters support the GOP’s energy policies, including fracking, and the resulting pipleines.

So, I find it hard to be sympathetic to a county that supports the GOP energy policies by delivering big numbers of their votes for GOP candidates, who in turn, pass legislation like fracking.

Giles County is pretty darn Republican and it certainly has a Tea Party bent in its electorate.  Look at these results from some past elections:

2014 – Gillespie – 60%

2013 – Obenshain – 68%

2012 – Romney – 62%

So what we have here is a solid red county, who gives BIG margins to GOP candidates, who in turn, support policies like, fracking.  But now that a pipeline is being built in their county, the very voters who support the candidates who passed fracking legislation are now showing up at meetings with their “Not in my backyard” mentality.  

The pipelines are going to be built – it’s now a question of exactly what route the pipeline will take.  

I really have difficulty feeling bad for GOP voters in places like Giles County, and throughout many parts of West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, because they got exactly what they wanted by the ballots they cast.  So let them deal with the resulting fallout of lower property values, etc., and perhaps they’ll do a bit more thinking before they cast their next ballot.