Home Blog Page 2073

Winners and Losers: Virginia Election 2014 Edition

31

Here are a few winners and losers from this Virginia election cycle that I believe are worth highlighting. I’m  mostly going to avoid national stuff on this list, just focus on our state. Also, this list isn’t meant to be even close to comprehensive, just some stuff that jumped out at me, so please add winners and losers of your own in the comments section. Thanks.

Winners

1. Ed Gillespie: Yes, he lost yesterday, but he was a huge winner nonetheless. At the start of this, would ANYONE have thought that Gillespie could have almost defeated Mark Warner? Seriously? No, of course not. Which means that Gillespie has now gone from being a DC lobbyist and operative (aka, “hack”) to a potential powerhouse in Virginia Republican politics, whether that’s a 2017 run for governor or whatever.

2. Ed Gillespie’s campaign; manager Chris Leavitt; digital director Eric Wilson; Communications Director Paul Logan; etc.: I was impressed, not with the substance of course (typical Republican policies, pretty much), but with the energy, apparently enjoyment of the campaign, smart strategy (e.g., pounding Warner on the contrast between his “radical centrist” image and his actual voting record was super smart, even if misleading and oversimplified; hitting him on the Phil Puckett scandal was audacious coming from “Enron Ed,” but also smart). Gillespie’s campaign seemed to outhustle the Warner campaign at every turn, including on social media, where they were far more active, creative, energetic, you name it. With a bit more money, it’s quite possible that Gillespie could have won last night. Amazing.

3. Barbara Comstock’s campaign: I’m obviously not a fan of Comstock’s, but her campaign did a great job pounding Foust (and not letting him get up off the mat) on his “real job” gaffe. Also, it’s annoying, but it was probably smart for Comstock to avoid the media, given that she almost certainly knew she had a big lead. Other than that, she ran a generally disciplined, professional campaign, with a candidate who was forceful, articulate, etc. Sure, she was wrong on all the issues, plus she lied about who (or why) she voted for in the 2008 Virginia Democratic primary, but you didn’t really expect the “liberal media” (yeah right!) to call her out on that did you now, as Chuck Todd did to Alison Grimes? 🙂

4. Peter Rousselot: I disagree with him on the streetcar, and I disagree with his support for John Vihstadt, but no question he helped put that winning operation together and run it successfully. Whatever else you might think of Peter, there’s no doubt he’s a super-sharp guy and dangerous (if you’re on the opposing side) political operative.

5. Libby Garvey: Again, I strongly disagree with her on the streetcar, but she now just needs one more ally on the Arlington County Board – which she quite possibly could get in next November’s elections – and she’ll be in the “majority” on the streetcar, and possibly other issues as well.

6. Tim Kaine: If there was any doubt which Virginia U.S. Senator is the front runner for the 2016 presidential running mate, there isn’t anymore. I mean, I always assumed Kaine was a better fit for likely nominee Hillary Clinton’s ticket anyway, but Warner’s razor-thin escape from political death last night should clinch it, especially when one considers that Kaine beat George Allen in 2012 by 6 points.

7. Ben Tribbett: He doesn’t have a blog anymore, but his coverage on Twitter (which, by the way, is essential if you’re in the least bit serious about politics) last night of the Warner-Gillespie race was far, far better (more astute, accurate, you name it) than the laughable coverage on places like CNN (Clueless Nincompoops Network?). For instance, Ben tweeted last night, “John King said Virginia Beach is a Dem stronghold again.  Someone at CNN get ahold of him, he is looking like a complete fool.” Yep. Also, as a national journalist pointed out to me, Ben was “out there weeks ago, saying the Virginia Senate race was not a foregone conclusion…he quickly looked at the data and was spot on throughout the evening, as he always is.”

8. Widows and widowers of servicemembers: Most definitely deserved.

9. Bob Goodlatte: With Eric Cantor and Frank Wolf gone, he now becomes the most powerful member of the Virginia House delegation.

Mixed

1. Mark Obenshain: On the one hand, his relatively clear path to the 2017 nomination is now pretty much gone (assuming Gillespie decides to go for it). On the other hand, Obenshain could run again for Attorney General, this time with someone not nicknamed (for good reason) Ken KOOKinelli at the top of the ticket. Of course, Obenshain will still have to deal with his own extreme views, such as wanting to criminalize miscarriages. But still, I could see him better off running on, let’s say an Ed Gillespie/Pete Snyder/Mark Obenshain ticket in 2017 than with himself at the top of the ticket (and god knows who for LG and AG).

2. Robert Sarvis: He ran again, he did much worse than last year, but he may have gotten just enough votes (2.4%) to help Mark Warner defeat Ed Gillespie. For that, Democrats all thank him. 🙂

Losers

1. The Warner campaign: I personally like the people who ran Mark Warner’s campaign, but to be blunt…what on earth were they doing? As one Virginia Democratic politico put it to me this morning, “the mechanics of the campaign were, at best, weak…very weak and flat…no energy; didn’t dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’; it was like there was no campaign, no exhortations to activists, nothing.” I agree. During much of this campaign, I kept thinking that at some point the Warner folks would wake up, but they never really did. For instance, why on earth was Ed Gillespie kicking the Warner campaign’s butt on social media? Why didn’t the Warner campaign even have a social media team, like Tim Kaine did in 2012 (and every competent campaign nowadays HAS to have, pretty much)? Why did the Gillespie folks seem to have a lot more signs everywhere? What on earth was the Warner campaign’s messaging exactly, particularly with regard to firing up “the base” (given that this was, after all, almost 100% a “base election)? Why were there never strong, crisp answers to criticisms of Warner on his voting record (“97% with Obama”), the Phil Puckett mess, etc? Why would Warner do stuff like come to Arlington and brag about working with the hated (by the Democratic base) Darrell Issa? I could go on and on, but that would take all day. Just a bafflingly lame, lethargic campaign all the way around, and it almost cost Warner reelection in the end. (P.S. I just saw that Ben Tribbett posted, “I attended over 50 Dem events in NOVA after labor day and never saw a Warner senior staffer at any of them.  Totally out of touch.” Ouch.)

2. Warner’s “radical centrism” shtick. I asked him in 2008 what this meant, and he either couldn’t or wouldn’t answer. To this day, I doubt Warner could really explain what that means, other than dissing the base constantly (e.g., comparing MoveOn to the Tea Party, mocking environmentalists and clean energy advocates) and partnering with the likes of Issa, etc. Anyway, yesterday should prove that there’s no political upside from trashing your “brand,” running away from your president and party, constantly pushing Republican framing and “false equivalence” nonsense, etc. Also, so much for Warner’s supposedly unique appeal in rural Virginia or to being some sort of post-partisan figure in this era of the Tea Party, and the hard-right Republican Party.

3. John Foust’s campaign: As lethargic and lame as the Warner campaign was, it’s hard to even know where to start with John Foust’s abysmal campaign. I guess we can start with the candidate, who is a good guy, but clearly wayyyy out of his league (in terms of knowledge of national/international issues, ability to articulate…well, anything, etc.) running for Congress. As for the campaign, why didn’t they quickly and forcefully respond to the “real job” gaffe at the time? (note: this is NOT “Monday morning quarterbacking,” as I had numerous conversations at the time on this very point, predicting that the Comstock folks would pound him on this until the end…and I was right) In the end, that’s exactly what happened, and it was a killer. I also don’t understand why there was never a strong, cohesive response to attacks on John’s wife for supposedly not accepting Medicaid patients? It’s not like they didn’t know this line of attack was coming. Meanwhile, the campaign didn’t even TRY to define Comstock early, like last winter/spring, both by seriously “tracking” her during session and also by relentlessly hitting her for her far-right-wing extremist endorsements (by the likes of Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, etc.). Remember, the “field” was cleared for Foust, while Comstock was bogged down in Richmond and then in a Republican contest for the nomination, opening up a clear shot for Foust to try to define her in the minds of voters. True, they didn’t have a lot of money at that point, but they certainly could have/should have used social media and “earned media” to do so. Why didn’t they? Got me. Speaking of money, was this the most cookie-cutter, uncreative, paint-by-numbers campaigns ever? I can just hear the DC consultants now: John, you need to spend the next 9 months on the phone 8 hours a day asking for money, so that at the end we can go on broadcast TV. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Did I mention “stupid?” Why? Because that strategy doesn’t work. Another example of someone who mostly stuck to that script? Judy Feder in 2006, who ended up with approximately the same percentage (41%) that John Foust got last night. Except that Feder was running against popular incumbent Frank Wolf, while Foust was running for an open seat, in a district that went for Romney by 1 point in 2012 (yet Foust lost by 16!!! points). For 2016, it’s time for a brand new candidate (paging Jennifer Wexton?) and a completely new campaign in Virginia’s 10th CD.

3a. The Foust email campaign: This one deserves its own separate mention, as it was SO awful, embarrassing, pathetic, derisive-laughter-inducing, you name it. I mean, seriously, who comes up with this ridiculous, apocalyptic language day after day (e.g., “This is as bad as it gets: if we don’t have the resources to fight back, our chances of winning will drop to ZERO.”)? Perhaps the worst of all came on November 2, touting absurd YouGov “poll” results showing a generic Democrat in the 10th CD supposedly down two points. The email language? “A brand new poll shows Democrats trailing Republicans by just 1 point in Virginia’s 10th district,” so donate $5 (“Need 1 donation from 22201”). I mean, the whole thing’s idiotic, including the “ask” – were they really saying they only needed ONE donation of $5 from the 22201 zip code? And yes, I know the rejoinder to criticisms of these degrading, smarmy emails is that “they work.” But does anyone really KNOW that? You mean, if they sent out normal, hard-hitting emails they’d raise so much less money than with these monstrosities? And even if normal emails raise a bit less money, is it really worth it to send out, under the candidate’s own name, such degrading trash? I vote “no.” How about you?

4. Arlington Democratic establishment: Such a huge “fail,” it’s hard to know where to begin. But let’s start at the inaptly named “victory party” last April, after Democrat Alan Howze lost the special County Board election to Republican John Vihstadt. Ben Tribbett and I got into an…er, “discussion” with a senior Arlington Democratic elected regarding his contention that Howze would win easily in November because Mark Warner would be on the ballot, etc. Ben and I practically bit the poor guy’s head off, but the point is, as Ben put it: “What [senior Arlington Dem at the April “victory party”] said is what all the county board members said also — basically…[that] the electorate in November is bigger and less informed and will do whatever is on the Democratic sample ballot…They insulted their own voters in what might be the best educated electorate in the world, and their voters came out and b**** slapped the f*** out of them.” I’d simply add that to assume you’re going to win an election is never smart, and to fail to listen to the message voters send you is also never smart (not to mention that it plays into the image of you as “arrogant, insular, and non-communicative”). Did the Arlington Democratic establishment do that after the April special election loss? Maybe a bit, but clearly not enough. Meanwhile, as someone who volunteered yesterday to hand out sample ballots at the polls, clearly that did not work. Nor did the idea that Mark Warner’s “coattails” would carry Howze to victory. In the end, Mark Warner got 47,643 votes in Arlington yesterday, while Alan Howze received 27,447 votes. That’s not a “dropoff,” that’s the Grand Freakin’ Canyon. Does anyone in the Arlington Democratic establishment have any clue why that happened or what to do about it? Uhhhhhhhh.

5. Alan Howze campaign: Not sure what they were doing all summer, but I did hear a lot of crickets quietly chirping away. Where was the passion, where was the energy, where was the willigness to take some risks/distance Alan from the unpopular County Board, etc.?  Got me. It’s sad, because Alan is a really good guy both personally and on policy matters. He would have made a solid County Board member. But now, after losing in 2009 for House of Delegates, and now twice in 2014 for County Board, it’s hard to see a future political career for Howze. Sigh…

6. The Columbia Pike Streetcar: On the one hand, the streetcar project is funded (mostly by state and regional money, plus a dedicated tax on businesses along the Pike), and has all the economic arguments on its side (e.g., it will bring in billions of dollars in investment and far more than pay for itself), it’s obviously not popular. The question is, with John Vihstadt now reelected, and with the prospect of either/both pro-streetcar County Board members up for relection next year (Mary Hynes and Walter Tejada) being seriously challenged, it’s not looking good for this project. It’s very unfortunate, because this would be a great thing for Arlington (and I’m a strong supporter), but if yesterday wasn’t a message sent by voters (who massively split their votes — for Warner, Beyer…and Vihstadt), I’m not sure what was.

7. The pro-streetcar effort to date: What pro-streetcar effort to date? The anti-streetcar effort has run circles around it, kind of like a Maserati racing around a streetcar picking up passengers or whatever. Why on earth is that? For my part, I’ve been telling them for a couple years now that they needed to ramp it up BIG TIME, but they didn’t. Ugh.

8. Jack Trammell campaign: It was always going to be seriously uphill in the “red” 7th CD, but if Trammell had ANY chance, at least to make it close, his campaign completely blew it. Coming out of the Brat upset of Cantor, there was a moment when Trammell was getting a lot of attention, people were flocking to his Facebook page, etc. Did his campaign take advantage of that momentum? Nope. Instead, weeks/months went by with pretty much dead air. Also, instead of pounding Brat as the Ayn Rand-worshipping extremist he truly is, Trammell by all accounts decided to run a campaign that barely mentioned Brat at all (for his part, Brat certainly took some hard shots at Trammell). Over the past few months, I heard tons of stories about the Trammell campaign, none of them flattering. I also watched as Trammell passed up opportunity after opportunity to go after Brat, to launch an aggressive defense of Democratic values, etc. And the result was…Brat 61%-Trammell 37%, which is 7 points worse than Wayne Powell did against Eric Cantor in 2012 (58%-41%). Great, huh?

9. YouGov “polling”: On 10/30, this outfit released “polling” data on every House race in the country. I put “polling” in quotes because the results were utterly laughable. For instance, here in Virginia, YouGov had Rep. Randy Forbes tied, 48%-48%, with an unfunded, unknown opponent.  They had Rep. Gerry Connolly winning by 27 points (he actually won by 16 points). And they had John Foust trailing 42%-40% to Barbara Comstock (actual result: Foust lost by 16 points). They also badly missed a bunch of other races, including Virginia, where  they had Warner up 10 points over Gillespie from “polling” done Oct. 16-23. Seriously, hang it up guys, or just switch to throwing darts at a dartboard or whatever.

10. Virginia/All of us: The next two years are going to be a complete cluster@#$#@$ with a bunch of conspiracy theorists, climate science deniers, etc. coming in to the House and Senate. Just a nightmare, the exact opposite direction our country needs to be going.

11. Virginia General Assembly: Specifically, for not funding upgrades to the State Board of Elections, which was a debacle last night – down most of the night, super slow, faulty data, etc, etc. This SHOULD be unacceptable, but of course Bill “ALEC” Howell and company have other priorities, like doing whatever their corporate masters tell them to do.

12. Suzanne Patrick campaign: How you manage to take a strong resume like Patrick’s and turn it into a 17.8-point loss in a “plus 2” Republican district is beyond me. But they did it, so as Chris Cillizza likes to say, “Congrats…or something.” Heh.

13. Broadcast TV advertising: I’ll have more on this, but can anyone seriously claim to me that John Foust or Mark Warner did better than they would have because the spent millions of dollars on wildly inefficient, super-low “bang-for-the-buck” broadcast TV advertising? If so, I’d love to see the data backing it up, specifically explaining how that money and time raising the money couldn’t have been better spent doing other things.

P.S. One more loser we could add would be the media, but what else is new? Probably the low point was the Post’s non-endorsement of John Foust, but overall the coverage of the 10th CD race exhibited the usual flaws of the media these days: sporadic, thin, false equivalency/”both sides” reporting, focus on sensationalism rather than substance, etc.

Warner Campaign on Post-Election Canvass: “nothing that will threaten Senator Warner’s lead”

0

I just got off a conference call with Marc Elias, chair of the Perkins Coie political law practice, to discuss the post-election canvass process. Here are a few key points:

*Mark Warner is up by more than 12,000 votes, the state is now undertaking the normal county canvass process in preparation for certifying their results to the State Board of Elections.

*Generally speaking, Virginia has very clean elections, and therefore “we tend to see very very little movement in the canvass process…nothing that will threaten Senator Warner’s lead.” If anything, “we tend to see Democratic candidates in general gain votes during that process.”

*Jurisdictions also need to deal with “provisional ballots,” in which Democrats almost always gain votes (certainly was the case in the Mark Herring recount).

*At the time this process is finished, the expectation is that Senator Warner’s lead “will be confirmed, will probably increase from where it is now…he will be declared the winner by the state…and be sworn in for a second term. There is nothing we have seen so far in the process…that suggests anything other than” that.

*The Warner campaign is monitoring the canvass returns and will do so the rest of the week.

*”There is really no precedence for a lead of this magnitude changing over the course of either this process or any other recount process that Mr. Gillespie might consider. The margin here is close but it’s not small. This is a close election but it is not a small lead, it is a sizeable lead…12,000 ballots.”

*The goal for the next week is to make sure that every Virginian who cast a lawful ballot is counted accurately.

*At the end, “I am 100% certain that Senator Warner will be reelected and be sworn into the Senate for a second term.”

*There is no reason to think that reported problems with touch-screen machines would serve as the basis for a recount and certainly not a contest. “You show me a state that has DRE machines, which are the touchscreen machines, and I’ll show you a state where someone someplace is able to say that the DRE wasn’t calibrated 100% correctly.” Same thing with optical scan machines.

*”I’m not sure there’s any precedent anywhere in the country for a 12,000-vote lead…to lead even a plausibly successful recount, no less an actually successful recount…I am 100% certain Mark Warner will be certified the winner.”

Learning from Defeat

0

Yesterday, November 4th, 2014, was a Democratic Pearl Harbor. In an era of economic turmoil, with household median incomes down 10% since 2000 and continuing to fall, a robust job market was the number one issue for America’s voters. What was the Democratic message for voters with falling incomes and tenuous jobs? Reproductive rights.

The cause of another Democratic debacle is extraordinarily clear. A liberal-only Democratic Party is a political minority. To regain the political majority, Democrats must regain the faith of working men and woman – who voted yesterday for Republican candidates across the ballot.

The means of Democratic resurgence is also extraordinarily clear. Every Democrat must test every political issue with a simple question: “How is it good for America’s working families?”

• Tax breaks for corporations? “How is it good for America’s working families.”

• Cut public education? “How is it good for America’s working families?”

• Constrain reproductive rights” “How is it good for America’s working families?”

• Restrict gun ownership? “How is it good for America’s working families?”

• Repeal & Replace Obamacare? “How is it good for America’s working families?”

• Bomb ISIL? “How is it good for America’s working families?”

• Deport illegal immigrants? “How is it good for America’s working families?”

• Cut carbon emissions: “How is it good for America’s working families?”

Only when the Democratic Party has the backs of America’s working families will the majority of Americans entrust their votes to the Democratic Party.  Democrats must prove we deserve their trust. The next test is in 364 days.  

Shame on Us! (Giving Still More Power to Such a Party)

8

Shame on us, the American People.

Giving more power to a Republican Party that has has been blatantly indifferent to the good of the nation.

Never in American history has there been a party so consistently destructive in its impact on America. Indeed, it is hard to find an instance these past six years when the Republicans have even tried to be constructive, tried to address our national problems.

Never in American history has there been a party so consistently dishonest in its communications to the people.

To know of this unprecedented  betrayal of the nation, we have no need of secret tapes or conspirators coming forward to testify. It has been there undisguised, right in front of our eyes.

Yet, yesterday, tens of millions of Americans who are unhappy with “Congress” for its record-setting failure to take care of the nation’s business voted for the party that deliberately worked to make Congress fail.

Shame!

Shame on us, the Democratic Party.

Once again running timidly (2002, 2010), the Democrats have failed not only themselves but the nation.

Clearly, the American people need help in seeing the monstrosity the Republican Party has become. But the Democrats — either blind to that reality, or afraid to speak of it — did not give them that help.

The Democrats should have made this election about the Republicans’ betrayal of the nation, in choosing to make the government dysfunctional rather than seeking to solve the nation’s problems. This election should have been about the veritable wrecking crew that the once-respectable Republican Party has become.

The Democrats should have helped the American people see how wantonly the GOP has trampled upon the ideals and traditions of our American democracy.

But they didn’t. And now the Republican strategy of seeking more power for themselves by creating problems they can blame on their opponents has been rewarded.

We live in a time of great darkening.

If the people at the top of the Democratic Party are incapable of rescuing our democracy from (what FDR called) “the forces of selfishness and of lust for power,” we in the grassroots will need to find a way to take up the job ourselves.

See the evil. Call it out. Press the battle.

The stakes are just too high. Are we willing to work to save our democracy from this ongoing power grab from the plutocrats whose instrument the Republican Party has become? Are we willing to work to assure that our nation acts responsibly in the face of the mounting danger of environmental catastrophe from the disruption of our climate, which the Republican Party has made it dogma to deny?

If not, then shame on us.

.

NOVA Turnout Sucked

0

Wow!  Warner by 12,000.  It was a landslide compared to Mark Herring’s win in 2013.  But Warner has always prided himself on being bi-partisan and winning in parts of the state that other Dems like Jim Webb, Time Kaine and Barack Obama could not.  But last night the bottom fell out of Warner’s campaign strategy – he faired poorly in strong GOP areas as well as in Democratic portions of the state, but able to pull a win out by the skin of his teeth.  Frankly, minority voters turned out in big enough numbers to save his behind.        

Clearly, turnout in NOVA sucked.

in 2013, Herring won Loudoun, Prince William, Fairfax, Arlington and Alexandria by a whopping 133,000.  Last night, Warner won these same areas by only 102,000 – a loss of 31,000 votes.  And based on results, it seems that these are white Democrats that didn’t how up at the polls; many of them are under 35 but not all.  Clearly the inability of the Warner campaign to run an agressive absentee ballot program in NOVA cost Warner votes.  

For comparison purposes, I looked at numbers in the Richmond area to see if the turnout disaster in NOVA was true in Richmond, and surprisingly enough, it was not.

In 2013, Mark Herring won Richmond, Chesterfield, Henrico, and Hanover Counties by 19,000 votes,  In 2014, Warner carried these four localities by the exact amount – 19,000 votes.  Clearly, African American turnout in central Virginia was better than expected.  But clearly turnout could have been better.

The folks running Warner’s campaign did a poor job guiding the ship and Warner’s bipartisan message used by Dems in statewide races in the 1980’s, 1990’s, and early 2000’s is basically shot to hell – just look at the 5th, 6th, 7th, and 9th CD races and you’ll see that.

Warner’s campaign was uninspiring, anemic,and lacked vision and direction.  They didn’t seem to understand the mechanics of how to run a campaign the way it was done in 2008, 2012, and 2013, and the results show that.      

One last thing – the 7th and 10th congressional races were a factor in the senate race.  Tea Partier’s, for the first time, finally got candidates of their choice nominated, and they turned out in droves.  Both CD’s had the two highest numbers of votes cast in the state.  And that was a bonanza for Gillespie – at least 26% of Gillespie’s total statewide vote came from these two CD’s.  

Brat was able to drive the crazies out in big numbers in Hanover, Culpepper and Spotslyvania and he won by HUGE numbers.  Not sure what Trammell’s strategy was, but clearly he was unable to win in the suburbs of Henrico and Chesterfield, which was his only clear path to victory.  Cleraly, Trammell was a poor candidate  who made a lot of poor choices, in a district he was going to lose from the get-go.  

Comstock did what she needed to do and that was turn out her base in Frederick, and portions of Loudoun, Fairfax and Prince William.  As far as Foust is concerned, he was a promising candidate, but after a series of costly mistakes, he imploded, causing the DCCC to abandon him.  

Why Democrats have no brand

0

The main problem with messaging of the Democratic party is that thanks to FDR, it became the party that champions populist causes. Yet today’s political world one must be committed to champion the interests of the rich if you ever want to have a chance to run due to the costs of political campaigns.

So in real terms, the Democratic party is redundant since we already have a party, the GOP, that is deeply committed, and has a track record of delivering results for the wealthy class in the U.S. The only difference right now is that Democrats are kinder towards the underclasses and care for the environment. So they will let them have some public education, roads, and gay marriage.

But the Democratic party has FDR’s populist legacy. So when it comes to voters, they can claim to be championing the underclass during the elections.

Yet the wealthy donor class is jealous. They don’t like hearing that bankers were responsible for 2008. Or that we need greater regulations. Or talk of controlling college tuition costs and student loans, because many of the donors make money of of this. And if you don’t praise the donors enough, they won’t trust you, and they will back the Ayn Rand inspired GOP.

So this bring us to the lack of brand. The Democratic Party, to be able to run election campaigns, must be rich-friendly to get the money, yet populist enough to get liberals to vote for it. It has to be either a contradiction or so bland that no one can get excited with it.

Let’s go back to student loans. Had Obama and the Democratic congress passed a reform back in 2009 that would allow for erasing student loan in bankruptcy and kicked out private lenders who profit out of lending federal money to students, we would have, to this day, a generation of solid democratic voters.

But the above plan ran against the desires of the wealthy political donor class.  So nothing happened.

And that is the source of voter apathy and low voter turnouts. When new voters finally get engaged and there is no direct change in their lives, they become apathetic. So elections to them, in a very personal way, don’t matter because nothing changed.

We who are political junkies will talk about the supreme court, and abortion rights, and gay rights and how this means that voting does matter. And this is a valid counter-argument. Yet from the perspective of a new engaged voter, those are more decisions that come from the above. Decisions that in real terms, they have no control or power to do anything about it.. Whether you vote for someone or against them, neither party is looking out for the interests of the common person who can’t donate consistently to campaigns due to having so much debt and low paying jobs.

I wish I could give a solution to this, but there isn’t one as long as money is allowed to play such a strong role in our political system. I read that Social Democrats in Europe are going through the same problems.

It all comes down that democracy is functionally broken today due to money.

Virginia News Headlines: Wednesday Morning

35

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Wednesday, November 5. Oh, and great quote by my friend Eric Byler on last night’s results: “I guess this means you don’t win elections by accepting false narratives constructed by the other party’s news channel. Next strategy.”

*A REPUBLICAN WAVE (“GOP dominates midterms, takes control of Senate”)

*How Bad Was It For Democrats? (“With few exceptions, 2014 turned out to be the worst possible scenario for Democrats.”)

*Negativity Wins the Senate (“Campaigning on pure negativity isn’t surprising for a party that has governed that way since Mr. Obama was first sworn in. By creating an environment where every initiative is opposed and nothing gets done, Republicans helped engineer the president’s image as weak and ineffectual.” Bingo.)

*Democrats Have Their Schlitz Beer Reckoning (“I have often wondered these past few years – when will the message and role of the Democratic Party become so watered down, so diluted, so unpalatable and unrecognizable from its former self that the public, even the most loyal customers, simply stops buying it? I think we’re there.”)

*President Obama Left Fighting for Relevance

*Axelrod: White House changes would be ‘wise’

*Democrats sift through the debris

*Big win for conservative big money

*Battle for the Senate: How the Republicans did it (“From the outset, Republicans had a simple plan: Don’t make mistakes, and make it all about Obama.” And Democrats apparently had no plan, while the media failed to call out Republican extremists like Ernst, Gardner, etc, etc.)

*New day dawns in Washington (“Those results provided a stark contrast to 2008, when Warner crushed his Republican opponent, former Gov. Jim Gilmore, by a whopping two-to-one margin.”)

*After drubbing, all eyes on Hillary Clinton (“Clinton will face enormous pressure to declare – and fast”)

*Blue state shocker: Hogan wins Md. governor’s race (Anthony Brown’s campaign was weak, lame, pathetic, whatever you want to say. Plus, he really DID botch the Maryland health care exchange rollout.)

*For Democrats, a night far worse than any had feared (Yep, most of us were “cautiously optimistic,” or some variant thereof, that it might not be too bad. It was.)

*Potential GOP chaos (“The consequence of an agenda-free campaign.”)

*Analysis: Nail-biter shows Virginia remains a battleground (“Warner’s margin – dramatically closer than his debut for Senate in 2008 because of a much lower turnout and a sour electorate – shows that Virginia remains a battleground state prized by both parties, increasingly at the presidential level.”)

*Virginia gets three new members of Congress (One good one – Don Beyer – and two godawful ones — Barbara Comstock and Dave Brat.)

*Our view: What happened Tuesday night (“In hindsight, Warner’s invincibility was somewhat overrated…Virginia is very much a swing state, and in a good Republican year, even a no-name candidate like Gillespie came oh-so-close to knocking off a Democratic giant. And conceivably still could in a recount.”)

*Constitutional amendment on property tax break passes

*Dave Brat defeats Jack Trammell to win 7th District seat (Not surprising. I mean, it’s a solidly “red” district, but still, I can’t tell you all the bad stuff I’ve heard – and observed myself – about the Trammell campaign the past few months. Total #FAIL)

*Election 2014: GOP takes Senate, regional lawmakers keep House seats

*Sen. Mark Warner declares victory over GOP’s Ed Gillespie (“The unofficial results were so close that a recount is possible.” This campaign baffles me too. A lot of us were scratching our heads, wondering when Warner would really kick into gear, where the campaign was on social media and on the ground, etc, etc. This fiasco – and it IS a fiasco, even though Warner, formerly considered the titan of Virginia politics, eked out a narrow victory over Republican political operative Gillespie – deserves a lot more analysis.)

*Comstock defeats Foust in Virginia’s 10th Congressional District (This is one of the most pathetic showings of the night, especially after all the money was spent by Dems on this one, after all the talk about how this was a winnable district, etc, etc. I’ll have more in the “winners and losers” list, probably a lot more in follow-up analyses critiquing the disastrous Foust campaign.)

*Bob Goodlatte cruises to 12th term in 6th District (As did Morgan Griffith and Robert Hurt and Randy Forbes and Bobby Scott and Gerry Connolly and Rob Wittman…)

*Dance wins election to replace Marsh in 16th Senate District

*Six of 7 Beach council incumbents lead for re-election

*Norfolk voters overwhelmingly approve elected School Board

*Turning milder through midweek, before rain and cold arrive on Thursday

There must be some mistake

0

It’s shortly after midnight, 4-5 November and the talking heads are telling me Republicans have seized the Senate and expanded their hold on the House.

Must be some mistake.

After all, Democrats have the lead among women, Latinos, blacks, union members, millenials, smart young people on Twitter, and among anyone else whose opinion counts for anything.  Right?

Virginia, National Election Results 2014: Live Blog

22

It’s 7 pm, and polls are now closed in Virginia. In this live blog of the election returns, I’ll primarily be checking the Virginia State Board of Elections website,  VPAP and the Fairfax County Board of Elections site. Feel free to use the comments section of this post to report what you’re hearing. As far as I can tell, the most interesting races tonight in Virginia will be: a) Mark Warner (D) vs. Ed Gillespie (R) for U.S. Senate; b) John Foust (D) vs. Barbara Comstock (R) for U.S. House of Representatives in the 10th CD; and c) Alan Howze (D) vs. John Vihstadt (R) for Arlington County Board. On that last one, which could be the closest of all of them, I’ll be very interested to see how much turnout increases from the April 8 special election, particularly in places with a lot of “federal-election-only voters” (e.g., the Orange Line corridor, precincts like Virginia Square, Rosslyn and Ballston; Blue Line precincts like Crystal City). My assumption is that higher turnout (and lower “dropoff”) among federal-only voters will help Howze. We’ll see.

UPDATE 11:25 pm: Make that Warner 1,059,269 – Gillespie 1,040,661 with 99.14% reporting. Not quite a 1 percentage point win for Warner.

UPDATE 11:15 pm: VPAP finally updates, has  it as Mark Warner 1,043,554 (49.18%) – Ed Gillespie 1,024,340 (48.27%) with 98.24% of precincts reporting. For whatever reason, they STILL haven’t incorporated all the Fairfax County numbers, which have been available for a long time. I really don’t get it. Anyway, looks like Warner pulled this one out, but certainly not by 5 or 7 points or whatever, and certainly not what he beat Jim Gilmore by 6 years ago. A stunning turn of events, no matter how you look at it.

UPDATE 11:02 pm: This night is officially a fiasco for Democrats, with Michelle Nunn apparently losing outright in Georgia (not even going to a recount) and Tillis leading Hagan in NC. Oh, and Brown is losing in Maryland for Governor, Pat Roberts has won in Kansas, and…yeah, this just bites.

UPDATE 10:54 pm: The Virginia State Board of Elections website is so f’ed up, I’m going to switch to Politico (you know I’m desperate when I do that – lol!). Anyway, they have Warner up 1,037,231-1,033,809 with 98.6% reporting. They have Comstock winning 56.7%-40.2% with 100% reporting. Also Brat trounced Trammell by 24+ points (62.1%-37.9%), while Rigell is beating Patrick by 17 points (58.5%-41.5%).

UPDATE 10:47 pm: Gotta throw in a few tweets by David Roberts of Grist, one of the smartest people on the intertubes. First, the super-snarky “Looks like running away from Obama was just the ticket for Dems.” Second, “Somewhere, a Dem consultant is preparing his ‘how Dems can move to the right to recapture the center’ memo…” Exactly! And finally, “If I’m reading these election numbers right … [squints, adjusts green eye shade, taps on calculator] … everything sucks balls.” LOL 🙂

UPDATE 10:34 pm: @jennaportnoy tweets, “.@MarkWarnerVA crowd erupts when @CNN flashes the latest: Warner 48.7 percent to @EdWGillespie’s 48.6.”

UPDATE 10:20 pm: Really, really, REALLY (did I mention “really?”) bad news in Colorado. @rollcallpols tweets, “Corey Gardner defeats Mark Udall in #COSEN.” Gack. Also very unfortunate: @Taniel tweets, “Two of the biggest races of the night have just been called for the GOP: Scott Walker in Wisconsin (ABC), Rick Scott in Florida (AP).”

UPDATE 10:19 pm: @notlarrysabato tweets, “PROJECTION:  MARK WARNER HAS DEFEATED ED GILLESPIE.”

UPDATE 10:11 pm: See here for final Fairfax County returns, other than absentees. Warner 160,164- Gillespie 112,190.

UPDATE 10:01 pm: @greggiroux tweets, “237/238 in Fairfax County, Warner up there 48,000 votes.” @HotlineJosh tweets, “With Fairfax County #s in (via @greggiroux), Gillespie would still hold about a ~2K lead. This one’s as close as they come.” VPAP now says it’s Gillespie by 424 votes with 95.54% counted. Craaaazy! @notlarrysabato tweets, “PROJECTION:  (assuming sbe numbers are right now) MARK WARNER WILL FINISH NIGHT WITH A SMALL LEAD.  Probably within recount range.”

UPDATE 9:57 pm: Ugh, this sucks. @Taniel tweets, “#COSen has been called for Cory Gardner by some networks. Senator Udall ousted. The biggest win yet for Republicans tonight.” Also, the Lousiana Senate race is going to a recount.

UPDATE 9:48 pm: Other than Fairfax County, need to look at Prince William County and Portsmouth City for potentially making the difference in the Warner-Gillespie race.

UPDATE 9:33 pm: All kinds of problems with the Virginia State Board of Elections and VPAP tonight. Really need reform and an infusion of resources there, as this is just pathetic and embarrassing. If you believe VPAP, it’s now Gillespie leading by under 19,000 votes with 91.40% counted. Still a decent # from Fairfax County to report. @notlarrysabato tweets, “From what I can see Warner is up about 8,000 but almost all of NoVA is now in.” Also, “Recount looking more and more likely.” For all of us who will never forget Webb vs. Allen election night in 2006, are you feeling a bit of deja vu??!?

UPDATE 9:11 pm: With 2,162 of 2,557 (84.55%) counted, it’s now Gillespie 49.32%-Warner 48.12%. Still a lot of Dem votes left in Fairfax County and Richmond City. As for John Foust, he’s very close to Judy Feder 2006 territory, with just 41.74% of the vote and 74% of votes counted. Yikes.

UPDATE 9:04 pm: @JakeSherman tweets, “AP calls VA10 for Barbara Comstock. Big win for political consultant Ray Allen. Allen was Eric Cantor’s longtime top political aide.” OK, so who are Dems going to recruit to run against her in 2016? That could be our best shot at getting her out of there for a long time to come.

UPDATE 8:59 pm: @CrassPolitical tweets, “2000 all over again. Crist down by 123,000 with 93 in and were hearing about bad viting machines in Broward. 14 years later.Can’t make it up.” Gotta love Florida. Or not!

UPDATE 8:50 pm: @notlarrysabato tweets, “This Warner-Gillespie election is going down to the wire.  I’m stunned.  Don’t believe anyone who tells you they know result yet.” On the other hand, @AMartinReports tweets, “Just spoke w/ Warner spokesman, very calm and confident in NOVA/Va Beach results to come in. Not sure if it that means anything.” Also, @MSchmidtRTD tweets, “Folks are getting slightly nervous here at Warner event, waiting for the wave of Fairfax votes to push the senator over the finish.”

UPDATE 8:45 pm: Great news from @ezraklein  — “Scott Brown loses in New Hampshire.” 🙂 Also, @Taniel tweets, “Who thought Mark Warner would be sweating it out more than Jeanne Shaheen tonight?”

UPDATE 8:42 pm: Rep. Scott Rigell now leading in the 2nd CD by 10 points over Suzanne Patrick, with 28.5% of precincts reporting.

UPDATE 8:39 pm: @ArlingtonVotes tweets, “Still waiting on 4 pcts plus absentee: Howze 22379 Vihstadt 29173.” That makes three straight general election losses for Howze (2009 for House of Delegates, earlier this year in a special election for Arlington County Board, and tonight). Sigh…

UPDATE 8:34 pm: With 1,604 of 2,557 (62.73%) of precincts reporting statewide, it’s Ed Gillespie 50.57%-Mark Warner 46.86%. Still lots of precincts left in “blue” areas like Fairfax County, Richmond City, Norfolk City, etc.  ‏@notlarrysabato tweets, “Based on Loudoun precincts in- I see Warner overcoming deficit there and winning Loudoun.  Looking better for him.” Could Warner win by a similar margin to what Terry McAuliffe won by last year? Starting to look quite possible.

UPDATE 8:27 pm: Good news for Rick Scott in Florida. Per @DKElections – “Last batch of votes very good for Scott. He’s up 3, with 85% in. #flgov” As for Mark Warner, with 46% of precincts reporting, he’s down 51.8%-45.7%. Looks like Mark Pryor lost Arkansas, as expected.

UPDATE 8:22 pm: @ArlingtonVotes tweets, “With 40 pcts reporting, it’s Howze 18280 Vihstadt 23929.” Will take a miraculous comeback at this point.

UPDATE 8:14 pm: I’ll have more on this tomorrow, but I think we can safely say that YouGov’s House of Representatives “polls” (which showed John Foust down just 2 points to Barbara Comstock in the 10th CD, Randy Forbes TIED in the 4th CD, and other crazy s***, were utter garbage.)

UPDATE 8:12 pm: @ArlingtonVotes tweets, “25 pcts: Howze 11050 Vihstadt 15027.” Still not good. Also, @RTDSchapiro tweets, “@DonBeyerVA wins heavily Democratic #Va08.” Not in the least bit surprising, except perhaps to Micah Edmond and the Fairfax Republicans? LOL

UPDATE 8:07 pm: In the 10th CD, it’s Comstock 56%-Foust 41% with 17 of 199 precincts counted. My private estimate for weeks now has been that Comstock would win by about 10 points. Right now, she’s doing better than that. The question is, will Foust out-peform Judy Feder’s 40.96% (in a somewhat different district vs. incumbent Rep. Frank Wolf) in 2006?

UPDATE 8:06 pm: @notlarrysabato tweets, “Can project Gerry Connolly as a winner as well tonight.” No argument there!

UPDATE 8:05 pm: @PostReid tweets, “CNN calls Pennsylvania Gov race for Tom Wolf (D), first incumbent governor goes down.” Good riddance. Now…time for Rick Scott to lose!

UPDATE 8:03 pm: @ArlingtonVotes tweets, “15 pcts reporting, it’s Howze 5887. Vihstadt 7703.” Not looking good for Howze.

UPDATE 7:59 pm: @LukeRussert tweets, “our models indicate Warner should be fine minus a collapse in Northern VA.”

UPDATE 7:56 pm: With 35% of Virginia precincts counted, it’s Gillespie 51%-Warner 46%. Still, mostly “red” areas, but definitely a serious race here.

UPDATE 7:46 pm: @ArlingtonVotes tweets, “So far @alanhowze has only won one precinct, Crystal Plaza, over @voteforvihstadt and there narrowly.” Hmmm. Also, Dave Brat is romping over Jack Trammell, 60%-40% with 23% of precincts reporting. That one’s over. Don Beyer’s crushing Micah Edmond, as expected. In the 10th CD, with 4 precincts counted, it’s Comstock 56%-Foust 40%. @notlarrysabato tweets, “PROJECTION:  Barbara Comstock has defeated John Foust and is the new member of Congress from VA.” I agree.

UPDATE 7:40 pm: Finally some solid Virginia #s. In Arlington, with 3 precincts in, it’s Vihstadt 62%-Howze 38%. In the Senate race, with 398 of 2,557 precincts reporting, it’s Gillespie 53%-Warner 45%. Also, @notlarrysabato tweets, “Warner wins Bonnie Brae in FFX 575-407.  He won it by similar margin in 01 Gov race.  That race he only got FFX by 26K.”

UPDATE 7:39 pm: @notlarrysabato tweets, “I’m seeing some troubling signs for Warner- but way too early to project anything.”

UPDATE 7:34 pm: @CBSPolitics tweets, “PROJECTION: Republican Shelley Moore Capito wins #WVSen, a gain for #GOP.” Not surprising, but sad.

UPDATE 7:28 pm: @QuentinKidd tweets, “@MarkWarnerVA loses west/southwest #Va big, but wins inner #NoVa big.” No shock there. Also, @dsherfinski tweets, “At Warner HQ, Gov. Terry McAuliffe said they always knew the race was going to be close but that MW is headed back to the U.S. Senate.” Yep, that’s what I’ve been hearing from them for many weeks now.

UPDATE 7:21 pm: @Taniel tweets, “Already 760,000 ballots counted in #FLGov, and Crist leads by 24%. There was no particular reason to think he’d crush the early vote.” Go Crist!!!

UPDATE 7:20 pm:  ‏@markos tweets, “Whatever happens in the Senate, the governorships should be good for Dems tonight.” Which, I’d add, actually could be more important. Also, Daily Kos writes, “Working off exit poll numbers, Warner is up 49.63 to 47.39 in Virginia, shockingly close. Gillespie even went off the air at the end! (More proof of how irrelevant TV advertising has become.)”

UPDATE 7:18 pm: @vpapupdates tweets, “State Board of Elections site is down….Please beam good energy toward their server.” Seriously, it wouldn’t be an election night in Virginia without the State Board of Elections website going down, running really slowly, etc. #FAIL

UPDATE 7:14 pm: @DKElections tweets, “So far Crist outperforming Sink by quite a bit in Broward and Palm Beach. If it holds, very good omen. #flgov” Please please please please…

UPDATE 7:09 pm: @geoffreyvs tweets: “#VASen exit poll shows @MarkWarner up 50-47 over @EdForSenate. In #GASen exit poll, David Perdue (R) leads Michelle Nunn (D) 49-48.”

UPDATE 7:01 pm: @LarrySabato tweets, “CNN calls KY for McConnell right away. Not even close race. Why Crystal Ball had KY Likely R all year. NEVER a toss up.”

Virginia News Headlines: Election Day 2014

1

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, November 5 – Election Day, 2014. Just one word for today: VOTE! Actually, make that two words: VOTE DEMOCRATIC! Thanks. 🙂

P.S. Photo by Jack Powers.

*The biggest bloc of voters are the shameful ones who do nothing (“Who shapes our government? The huge number of Americans who opt out of this right many have died for.”)

*Election Tests New Rules on Voting

*Eugene Robinson: Our politicians are flunking the vision test (“Sadly, there are few votes to be won with measures that are painful or spending that may not bring results in our lifetimes. No glory, just honor.”)

*With ‘Car Talk,’ he and his brother turned a radio show into a joy ride (“Click and Clack gave sound auto advice, but always veered hilariously off-course.”)

*10 Terrifying Facts From the UN’s New Climate Report (“It’s getting hotter. We’re causing it. And we have to act now.”)

*On the last campaign day, Ed Gillespie, Mark Warner rally supporters

*Ignore the noise and vote (“If history is any indicator, half of Virginia’s registered voters won’t cast a ballot in the midterm election today. That’s an unfortunate reflection of civic apathy, and a lackadaisical public view toward a right that ought to be revered.”)

*Our view: Seven places to watch tonight

*Dominion seeks review of natural gas pipeline

*Mark Warner supporters attend pre-Election Day rally

*Ed Gillespie and his ‘G-Force’ make final appeal to unseat Sen. Warner

*Warner, Gillespie make final push in Richmond-area stops

*Ann Romney rallies for Gillespie, Comstock on eve of vote (What a bunch!)

*Brat, Trammell make final campaign pushes in 7th District

*Attorney general looks into phone records sharing

*Gov. McAuliffe Convenes Summit on Expanding Health Care Access for VA Veterans

*Arlington bans ‘the box’ for county job applicants

*Loudoun supervisors seeking $10,000 pay raises, $20,000 for chairman

*A landslide nice day today, but clouds, then rain, and, by Friday, a chill