Home Blog Page 2316

Virginia News Headlines: Saturday Morning

3

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, September 21. Also see President Obama’s weekly address in which he says, “Congress must meet two deadlines in the coming weeks: pass a budget by the end of the month to keep the government open, and raise the debt ceiling so America can pay its bills.”

*House spending bill sets up battle with Senate (“The chamber’s stopgap budget plan funds the government into December but strips money from Obamacare.” I love how the media talks neutrally about the “House” and the “chamber,” instead of saying “Republicans.” They are such cowards.)

*Rigell only Republican to vote against budget bill (“Although he favors defunding the Affordable Care Act, Rigell said he could not support the bill because it continues automatic spending cuts – the sequester – that have taken a toll in his military-rich district.”)

*Cuccinelli team: Aide’s emails were not OK’d (So, the choices here are: a) the emails WERE approved, in which case Cuccinelli engaged in seriously bad behavior; or b) Cuccinelli was not in control of his office or aware what was going on. Either way, it’s a Cuccinelli #FAIL.)

*E.W. Jackson calls for eliminating corporate income tax, suggests Cuccinelli agrees (Wow, that would be an unmitigated DISASTER!)

*McAuliffe avoids position on EPA rules, Cuccinelli dodges on House spending vote (Hahaha, gotta love it. Or not.)

*Va. Republicans didn’t criticize Bolling in order to keep spotlight on Cuccinelli (“Speaking against him would strengthen the perception that the party is in disarray, some say.” Which it is, of course.)

*Eric Cantor on defunding: I support Ted Cruz (Wow, what a moron.)

*Senator Tim Kaine Is Officially the “Best Speller in the United States” (Not quite, but congratulations anyway!)

*With master plan, ODU’s vision for future coming into focus

*36 Northern Virginia public schools fall short of full state accreditation (This whole exercise is counterproductive.)

*Cuccinelli, Wolf Call Whitbeck’s Jewish Joke “Inappropriate” (Lame all around.)

*Cold front brings rain today, but wonderful weather is close behind (“You’ll definitely want to consider grabbing the rain gear, but it won’t be long till we’re back to blissful.”)

*Zimmermann keeps Nats’ hopes alive (“Jordan Zimmermann goes the distance, allowing just two hits while walking one and striking out nine as Washington keeps its faint playoff hopes alive.”)

E.W. Jackson calls for eliminating corporate income tax, suggests Cuccinelli agrees

0

From the DPVA, more insanity from the “Extreme Team” ticket: 

No longer content to merely blow a $1.4 billion hole in Virginia’s budget by reducing income taxes for the wealthiest Virginians and slashing the corporate income tax rate without saying how he'd pay for it, Ken Cuccinelli may now be going for broke. As the Washington Post reports below, E.W. Jackson told a crowd last night that he and Cuccinelli “really believe that if you plan properly, you could do away with the corporate tax in Virginia.”

Jackson said that “this is something Ken won’t talk about,” and looking at his campaign’s non-response to the Post, so far he’s right.

How will Ken Cuccinelli pay for his and E.W. Jackson’s secret plan to eliminate one of Virginia’s most important revenue streams for schools, transportation and public safety, and why is he keeping that information from Virginians? 

As VA Republicans Cue Coal Hysteria, Here Are a Few Actual Facts

7

This morning came encouraging news for anyone who cares about: a) human health; b) human well being; c) the future of our planet’s habitability (or lack thereof, if we continue on the current path); and d) the transition to a sustainable energy economy (which will still happen, but much more slowly, if the fossil fuel companies and their Republican lackeys get their way). What sane person could oppose human health and well being, having a habitable planet for future generations, and building a prosperous and sustainable economy for the 21st century and beyond? Take one guess.

You got it: Virginia Republicans – who receive huge sums up campaign ca$$ from coal (and other fossil fuel) companies – are ratcheting up the hysteria this morning about the “war on coal.” Mark Obenshain, for instance, hyperventilates that “[a]s Attorney General, I’m going to stand up for coal jobs, and for all Virginians, in opposing these overreaching federal regulations that kill jobs and economic opportunity in Virginia.” And Ken Cuccinelli goes for his usual wildly-over-the-top, super-hyperbolic approach, Big Lie approach, claiming (falsely) that the modest – and long, long overdue – new rules on future power plants will ” crush Virginia jobs and hike energy prices for businesses, families and workers.”  

Here’s what you need to know about these statements: a) they’re complete bull****, essentially not an ounce of truth to them; b) they’re aimed at continuing the coal company gravy train – boatloads of campaign cash

from the coal companies, that is – to their own campaigns; and c) did I mention that they’re totally full of it?

How about, instead of Republican blather and hysteria, we look at a few actual FACTS? I know, what a concept! Anyway, here goes (fully aware that Republicans do NOT care about facts).

1. “Did the EPA just kill new coal plants?”, Mark Obenshain asks? Uh, no. Not even close. For starters, these long overdue (given that the Supreme Court back in 2007 essentially ordered the EPA to issue regulations on CO2 emissions) rules only cover NEW coal-fired power plants, not on EXISTING ones. But, you say, that’s a big deal, right? Well…see #2 below.

2. In fact, as the Washington Post’s Wonkblog explains: “It’s entirely possible that no coal power plants of any type will get built for years, regardless of what the EPA does Friday. That’s because natural gas is so cheap right now it’s not really economical to build coal plants.” That’s right, let’s emphasize that point: cheap natural gas has ALREADY made new coal-fired power plants uncompetitive. And that’s HIGHLY likely to continue, given the boom in natural gas production in this country. Here’s Wonkblog:

Roughly speaking, natural gas prices needs to rise above $7 per million BTU for new coal plants to be competitive. But the U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that natural gas prices will stay under $6 per million BTU for the next two decades. As a result, the agency doesn’t think any coal plants will be built between 2018 and 2035.

That’s one reason why an earlier draft of the EPA power-plant rule predicted that the regulations for new power plants would have virtually no costs in the near term. After all, no new coal plants were likely to get built in the United States anyway. So the EPA rule won’t make much difference one way or the other. Unless, of course, natural gas prices rise unexpectedly  – something that’s happened in the past.

Did you hear that, Ken Cuccinelli and Mark Obenshain? That’s right: natural gas is out-competing coal (it’s called “capitalism,” ever hear of it, Ken and Mark?); and because of that, “no new coal plants were likely to get built in the United States anyway.” None. Zero. Nada. Zilch. So what the hell are you hyperventilating about again?

3. Coal-fired power plants are also increasingly not competitive with clean energy. As Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz explains, we are undergoing a “clean energy revolution – now.” Did you know, for instance, that in 2012, “wind was America’s largest source of new electrical capacity, accounting for 43 percent of all new installations?” Did you know that since 2008, “the price of solar panels has fallen by 75 percent, and solar installations have multiplied tenfold?” Did you know that “[r]enewable energy is becoming more and more competitive, to the point now that new generation from wind costs less than conventional coal-fired generation — and can even give natural gas a run for its money?” (see above graph from Greentech Media on the steeply falling cost and rapidly increased deployment of wind power)

4. If you’re a dumb enough investor to put money into new coal-fired power plants, even as they are being out-competed by natural gas and, increasingly, wind and solar (not to mention energy efficiency, which demolishes new coal-fired power plants purely on economic grounds), the fact is that coal plants can still be built under the EPA regulations. But again, you’d be really, really dumb to build one, given that they are not the lowest-cost option to generate power, and given that the trend lines are all moving in the wrong direction – for coal, that is.

5. Research shows that far from being an economic positive for coal-producing regions, “[c]oal mining areas fared significantly worse on all indicators compared with non-mining areas of Appalachia and/or the nation.” That’s in terms of median household income, poverty rates, unemployment, disease and mortality rates, you name it. The question is, why would anyone in their right mind want to invest in something that kills jobs, humans, and the environment, especially when it’s not even economically competitive with other options (natural gas, energy efficiency, wind, and increasingly solar power)? You’d have to be an ignoramus, right? Speaking of which…hello Ken Cuccinelli and Mark Obenshain? Any response to these facts? Or are you just going to keep on hyperventilating and making s*** up?

Remember When the Coal Industry Loved “Clean Coal”?

1

The Environmental Protection Agency is unveiling carbon pollution limits for new power plants today. The coal industry is screaming bloody murder that no one could possibly expect new coal-fired power plants to implement carbon pollution-cutting technology, but it was only a few years ago that Big Coal was promising Americans it could do exactly that.

The rules will require that coal-fired power plants stop treating our skies like an open carbon sewer. While the rules are only being made public today, the coal industry has spent all week promising to send an army of corporate lawyers to fight the pollution restrictions:

Utility companies with large coal fleets already are preparing to challenge the rule, if it is finalized, on the grounds that the agency is requiring pollution controls that have not yet been “adequately demonstrated” in the marketplace.

Joseph Stanko, head of government relations for the law firm Hunton & Williams, said the EPA’s reliance on “federally funded demonstration projects” as the base for its new standard “is illegal, it doesn’t ‘adequately demonstrate’ technology for normal use.”

Remember the coal industry was buying billboards promising us coal could be “clean and green with new technologies”?

Ah, but that was before the coal industry blocked a clean energy and climate bill that would’ve provided billions in taxpayer subsidies for “clean coal.” Without taxpayers footing the bill, suddenly the idea of “clean coal” seems crazy to coal lobbyists:

Hal Quinn, president and chief executive of the National Mining Association, said the new standard “effectively bans coal from America’s power portfolio, leaving new power plants equipped with even the most efficient and environmentally advanced technologies out in the cold.” He accused the EPA of “recklessly gambling with the nation’s energy and economic future.”

You may remember the National Mining Association from when it joined a lawsuit against those liberal treehuggers in the George W. Bush administration who wanted to give polar bears endangered species protection.

Back to that reckless gambling with our energy and economic future. Remember when the coal industry bought millions of dollars worth of ads promising “clean coal” would bring “energy security” AND “affordability”?

Big Coal always puts its own profits above a safe climate and America’s public health, and will gladly lie to us to protect them. It’s a lesson to remember as the EPA carbon pollution limits move forward.

Tell the EPA you support strong carbon pollution standards for power plants.

Will Government Shutdown Shut Down Cuccinelli’s Gubernatorial Hopes?

4

by Paul Goldman

Will the GOP obsession with defunding “Obamacare” deflate a puzzling boomlet for Ken Cuccinelli, who should be DCA – Dead Candidate Walking – about now? At 200-Proof Politics, we play like it lies; we don’t judge, we just report. Right now, the evidence is clear: despite a massive anti-Cuccinelli TV barrage from Terry’s campaign, and months of constant negative Cuccinelli stores from the mainstream media (caused in large measure by an incompetent campaign strategy), the beleaguered GOP GUV guy isn’t DCA yet. In fact, the latest poll from a credible organization (Quinnipiac, not Roanoke) actually shows Cuccinelli LEADING if you posit a normative GOP turnout in a non-presidential statewide election year. Say what?

None of this changes my Democratic “sweep” prediction, although the limb is lonely right now. But the stats are the stats: despite the Q-poll internals favoring Terry, the Democratic GUV guy has not “sealed the deal,” as they say. I thought this thing could be over by September 15th if Cuccinelli didn’t have a good push back issue. But he has gotten lucky on other fronts: the trial of the ex-chef at the Mansion now off the table; the mess over the otherwise meaningless NOVA Tech PAC endorsement being made into some major PR thing by Democratic overreaction; the fact the independents seem to be souring on everyone; and the Q-poll suggesting GOP loyalists are willing to vote for Cuccinelli, even though they have a negative view of him.

Still, my middle-of-September rule only applies in blowout type situations, and Democrats have only had that one time (1985) in the modern Virginia gubernatorial race era. SO: While a comfortable Terry win is still there in the Q-poll numbers if his campaign does it right, perhaps the lucky breaks going Cuccinelli’s way will not just be a few weeks reprieve, but rather omens that he could make a real horse race of it going into election day.

Mitt Romney came back from DCA to rally, only to lose close in Virginia. In the end, a win is a win, but at this stage of the game, margin matters in the narrative. So does luck. And while Cuccinelli got a few breaks in recent days, it is also clear that the looming fight over Obamacare, and an increasingly likely government shutdown (pushed by some of Cuccinelli’s top Tea Party allies and ideological compatriots), threaten to shut down Ken Cuccinelli’s brief uptick.

 

I still hold to my view, lonely as it may be: Obamacare, which is tied to Medicaid expansion, should be a net-net PLUS issue for Cuccinelli in the Governor’s race. That he can’t seem to make it work for him is mind-boggling to me. The voters he needs to win are not big fans of Obamacare. In politics, when you are explaining, you are losing: and like it or not, Cuccinelli can make some plausible – for political purposes – charges that force McAuliffe into the “explaining” mode.

BUT: A government shutdown will be huge news in NOVA. It is difficult to see how any “spin” can turn this into a plus for the GOP in NOVA. Meaning: talk about a Tea Party-led government shutdown is already eating away at Ken Cuccinelli’s apparent boomlet. In fact, it might already have killed it. Logically, the President’s slumping numbers on Syria played a role in any Cuccinelli uptick and in rallying Republicans to a protest vote. The public isn’t giving the President credit for anything in Syria yet.

Bottom line: Obama is going to win a government shutdown fight. This takes the focus from Syria and puts it back on a playing field far weaker for the GOP. This has to hurt Cuccinelli, at the margins at least. A full-fledged government shutdown, caused by the Tea Party’s hard line on Obamacare and other issues, will cost Cuccinelli. Since the polls show his chances are iffy at best right now, this could make him DCA. Whatever extra energy it might give to GOP loyalists will be matched with equal (or greater) energy from Dems.

Given how this campaign has gone, it must be assumed that Cuccinelli held back on his biggest selling point – the first AG to sue over Obamacare – to align with the October 1 start for signing up with the health care exchanges. What else makes sense? But come October 1, the big news very well could be the Tea Party-led shutdown of the government, forcing federal employees in NOVA to stay home (possibly without pay?). That will ripple through the whole NOVA economy and social media. It is all downside for Cuccinelli as I see it, especially given that he brags that he was “Tea Party before the Tea Party.”

Truth is, all other things being equal, Cuccinelli would have been better off with a nasty trial of the ex-chef than with a nasty “your momma” finger-pointing shutdown of Uncle Sam. But since a shutdown is bad national politics for Republicans, I will be amazed if they go that route after seeing the outcome of the 1995 shutdown that sealed re-election for a then very weak Bill Clinton.

The House has to play its games to satisfy the base. But in the end, do they dare defy common sense? To the extent the public believes they will, Cuccinelli’s uptick may have already evaporated and bigger downside awaits.  

Virginia News Headlines: Friday Morning

3

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, September 20. Also check out the video of Rep. Gerry Connolly ripping the Republicans’ “Social Darwinism” – in this case, slashing food assistance for millions of Americans.

*Friendly gestures from Iran mark a rhetorical U-turn (Definitely worth exploring the positive signs from Iran, but of course we need to have our eyes wide open…)

*EPA moves to limit emissions of future coal-and gas-fired power plants (Good news, the problem is that climate science says this needs to have happened about a decade or two ago, and also be much MORE stringent. Not that the fossil fuel folks and their bought-and-paid-for hacks and “deniers” give a crap.)

*Pope Says Church Is ‘Obsessed’ With Gays, Abortion and Birth Control (The closer the Pope gets to what Jewish progressive revolutionary Jesus preached, the further he gets from the Republican Party’s intolerance and starve-the-poor nastiness. Go Pope Francis!)

*The Crazy Party (“In recent months, the G.O.P. seems to have transitioned from being the stupid party to being the crazy party.”)

*Obama must not yield on Obamacare, debt ceiling or shutdown (Agreed. Just as he shouldn’t have yielded on the “fiscal cliff” – but he did for some inscrutable/incomprehensible reason.)

*Terry McAuliffe Says Ken Cuccinelli Wanted to Make Divorce Harder for Women, and He’s Right

*Analysis: Ex-chef’s settlement is a break for Cuccinelli, avoids potential October surprises

*Review of AG office emails to energy company enlightening (Meanwhile, the legalized corruption in Cuccinelli’s own office was mind boggling.)

*McAuliffe’s views on the environment? He disagrees with Cuccinelli.

*McAuliffe outspends Cuccinelli on TV ads

*In Virginia Governor Race, Third Party Spoiler Threatens

*Gingrich says no to talk of a Senate run in Virginia (Too bad, that would have been hilarious!)

*Medicaid’s no cure-all for McAuliffe’s budget plan (“None of this argues against expanding Medi­caid in Virginia. Mr. McAuliffe is right about that, and the Republicans, including his opponent for governor, are wrong.”)

*Cuccinelli camp’s new ad spotlights NoVA business group’s hard-fought endorsement

*Cuccinelli touts record, slams McAuliffe in half-hour infomercial (I can barely stand looking at or listening to this freakazoid for 30 seconds, let alone 30 minutes- gack!!!)

*U-Va. alumni lobbying to be better represented on Board of Visitors

*Local GOP congressmen support funding bill — with a catch (“Randy Forbes won’t support a final version unless automatic defense cuts are stopped, and Scott Rigell wants to forbid legislators from taking long breaks until they pass budget and spending bills.”)

*A Case for Virginia (“AOL co-founder Steve Case and his wife, Jean, spend weekends in a one-bedroom cottage amid the vineyards of Virginia’s Madison County. Their goal: to turn their winery into a showcase for the state’s budding wine industry”)

*One more day of spectacular before clouds and showers head our way

*Harper’s homer helps Nats beat Marlins and keep playoff hope alive (“With Thursday’s win over Miami, Washington is five games behind Cincinnati for the final wild card slot.”)

Meet the Virginia “Poor People Starvation Caucus”

2

In stark contrast to everything Pope Francis believes (and Jesus preached), Virginia Republicans today voted – with one exception – to starve the poor. That’s right, the following Virginia Republicans are so nasty, so vicious, so mean-spirited, that they voted to cut food stamps by $40 billion over 10 years. If this bill ever became law – which it won’t because Democrats control the U.S. Senate and the White House, thank goodness – “3.8 million people would lose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits in 2014.” But that’s exactly the type of horrendous stuff that will happen if the American people are ever crazy enough to hand the keys of government over to these lunatics.

With that, here’s the Virginia “Poor People Starvation Caucus.”

Eric Can’tor, Randy Forbes Bob Goodlatte, Morgan Griffith, Robert Hurt, Scott Rigell, Rob Wittman

Voting NOT to starve millions of poor Americans were Frank Wolf (what got into him? he actually voted the right way on something for a change!), Gerry Connolly, Jim Moran, Bobby Scott.

Oh, and a special “screw you” to Eric Can’tor, who pushed this bill and who actually had the chutzpah to claim that it was “designed to give people a hand when they need it most.” Can we say “Orwellian?” The fact is, the legislation imposes new work requirements, but contains NO new funding for job training (let alone any new jobs for the people on nutritional assistance)! These Republicans are truly diabolical.

The Whitbeck Controversy: Local Repercussions

0

My two cents: By now, we’ve all seen John Whitbeck’s disturbing comments from Tuesday, and I’m very disappointed that Randy Minchew and Ken Cuccinelli didn’t speak up to correct their friend John Whitbeck when he made his comment. I’m even more disappointed that they didn’t say anything about it for the rest of their rally. We don’t need insensitive and clueless people like John Whitbeck as our public leaders, and we don’t need people who won’t speak up when they see a friend saying something offensive. We need leaders who will stand up for what’s right.

NextGen Challenges Cuccinelli: Were You Briefed on CONSOL or Not?

0

From NextGen Climate Actoin:

NextGen Challenges Cuccinelli: Were You Briefed on CONSOL or Not?

Arlington, VA – NextGen Climate Action Committee (NextGen) today challenged Ken Cuccinelli to reconcile conflicting media reports about when he was made aware of the lawsuit brought by Southwest Virginia landowners against subsidiaries of CONSOL Energy, a Pennsylvania-based energy company that has donated $110,000 to his gubernatorial campaign.

“Virginia’s voters deserve a straight answer from Ken Cuccinelli about whether he was briefed about his office’s involvement with the legal strategy of this out-of-state company being sued by his constituents,” said Mike Casey, spokesperson for NextGen. “I challenge him to stop dodging questions and come clean to the people of Southwest Virginia about when he knew his office was aiding the company their neighbors were suing, and if that aid was given in exchange for donations to hiscampaign.”

Casey was referring to conflicting reports from the The Associated Press and Roanoke Times on the timeline of when he was made aware of the lawsuit and his level of involvement in the legal aid given to the company.

Cuccinelli said in a September 16 AP story that, “no attorney general can be involved in the hundreds of such cases that his subordinates routinely handle,” claiming that he wasn’t involved in the lawsuit. However, in mid-June, his spokesperson told the Roanoke Times that senior staff briefed him on the lawsuit when the Commonwealth formally intervened in the case.

NextGen is asking Cuccinelli to address the  following questions raised by the conflicting stories:

If you were briefed, what guidance did you give your staff on how to treat the out-of-state company?

*Did you advise your staff to help CONSOL defend against a suit brought by the people the Attorney General’s office is supposed to protect?

*Did you leave this decision up to your staff? If so, why is that staff still working in your office when their actions have been deemed “shocking” by a federal judge?

“Virginians deserve to know exactly what Ken Cuccinelli and his staff did on behalf of CONSOL Energy after Cuccinelli’s campaign received $110,000 from CONSOL, ” said Casey. “Virginia is known for clean government and it’s outrageous that the Attorney General running for Governor won’t answer basic questions about his potentially

corrupt conduct.”

For a timeline of CONSOL Energy donations and action by the Cuccinelli’s office, please visit the webpage.

Video: Gerry Connolly Asks Republcians, “Have You NO Decency?” on Food Stamps Programs

0

Good for Rep. Connolly calling these people out for their callousness.