Home Blog Page 2420

Cuccinelli Sits Silent as Ohio Tries Campaign Donor who Defrauded Virginians

0

From the Democratic Party of Virginia:

 

 Cuccinelli Sits Silent as Ohio Tries Campaign Donor who Defrauded Virginians


Bobby Thompson Gave Cuccinelli $55,00, Ripped off Virginians, Faces No Consequences in the Commonwealth

 

Richmond, VA – On Monday the trial of top Ken Cuccinelli donor and accused fraud Bobby Thompson, aka John Donald Cody, was scheduled to begin in Cuyahoga County, Ohio as the defendant faced multiple counts of theft, money laundering, corruption, and identity fraud. Thompson was the subject of a nationwide manhunt after it was revealed that his charity, “U.S. Navy Veterans Association,” had defrauded donors in Virginia, Ohio and other states who believed they were helping men and women who served our nation.

 

The prosecution of Thompson in Ohio by two consecutive Attorneys General stands in stark contrast to Virginia where Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli sat out of his office's investigation of the fraudulent charity after a separate consumer protection agency in Virginia found the organization defrauded Virginians out of at least $2 million with Thompson's fake charity scheme.

 

“As Ohio's Attorney General brings Bobby Thompson to trial for his crimes in Ohio, Virginians are right to wonder why Ken Cuccinelli has sat on his hands for three years despite the crimes he committed here in the Commonwealth,” said DPVA Spokesman Brian Coy. “A past affiliation with Thompson didn't stop Ohio's Attorney General from pursuing this criminal aggressively, why did ours pass the buck after Virginians were defrauded?”

 

Thompson's arrest and trial in Ohio was the product of an aggressive investigation by two consecutive Ohio attorneys general. Democrat Richard Cordray began pursuing Thompson for his crimes against Ohioans, and then handed the investigation off to his successor, former Republican U.S. Senator Mike DeWine. Dewine continued to seek Thompson despite having been one of many recipients of political donations that Thompson made to politicians around the country.

 

The Ohioans that Thompson ripped off may be getting justice at the hands of their Republican Attorney General, but Virginians may not. Like DeWine, Ken Cuccinelli also benefited from Thompson's political contributions, to the tune of $55,000 to his 2009 campaign, but unlike DeWine, Virginia's Attorney General sat out of his own office's investigation. The status of any criminal prosecution against Bobby Thompson or US Navy Veterans Association in Virginia is unknown.

 

 

Background:

 

Bobby Thompson was Second Largest Individual Contributor to Cuccinelli's Campaign

In May 2010, the Roanoke Times reported, “The donations include $55,500 to Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli's campaign, the second-largest by an individual to Cuccinelli.” [Roanoke Times, 5/16/10]

 

Cuccinelli Refused to Return $55,000 in Campaign Contributions after Other States Launched Investigation of Bobby Thompson and US Navy Veterans Association  

In June 2010, the Roanoke Times editorialized, “He doesn't plan to part with a dime of it unless Thompson is convicted of misappropriating charitable funds. Presumption of innocence, and all that. Which would be a passable argument for a mayor, dog catcher or even a governor — but not for an attorney general. Consider that in several other states, the investigations of Thompson and U.S. Navy Vets are being led by attorneys general.” [Roanoke Times Editorial, 6/17/10]

 

Independent of Cuccinelli, a Virginia Consumer Services Probe found US Navy Vets Fraudulently Collected $2 Million from Virginia Residents

In February 2011, the Roanoke Times reported, “The now defunct U.S. Navy Veterans Association raised the money over a five-year period that ended last year, when Virginia and other states launched investigations of the suspect organization, according to information gathered during a probe by the state's Office of Consumer Affairs.” [Roanoke Times, 2/22/11] 

 

Investigation then Turned over to Office of the Attorney General

In February 2011, the Roanoke Times reported, “The case was turned over Monday to the office of Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, who last year forfeited more than $55,000 in campaign contributions that he received in 2009 from the self-described director of U.S. Navy Vets.” [Roanoke Times, 2/22/11]

 

Cuccinelli “Walled Off” from Thompson Investigation

In August 2011, the Roanoke Times reported, “Cuccinelli said he chose to be 'walled off' from a probe of the U.S. Navy Veterans Association because he received $55,500 in campaign contributions in 2009 from a man who acted as the charity's director and is now a fugitive facing criminal charges. The mysterious figure used the stolen identity of Bobby Thompson.” [Roanoke Times, 8/04/11]

 

Cuccinelli: Case “Not Even Discussed with Me”

He said, “It is not even discussed with me. I know that it's not laying dormant; but, also, nobody's found Bobby Thompson.” [Roanoke Times, 8/04/11]

 

Ohio AG Investigation Led to Conviction of US Navy Vets Treasurer Blanca Contreras  

In June 2011, the Roanoke Times reported, “Blanca Contreras — one of the few real people to emerge from the stealthlike U.S. Navy Veterans Association — pleaded guilty to corruption, theft, money laundering and record tampering.  It was the first conviction to come from multiple investigations launched last year after questions emerged about the whereabouts of the U.S. Navy Vet's directors, its offices and the money it collected.” [Roanoke Times, 6/23/11]

 

Democratic and Republican Attorneys General in Ohio Prosecuted US Navy Vets Treasurer

In August 2011, WCPO reported, “Ohio's attorney general's office says some of that money ended up as donations to mostly conservative Republican candidates including then-U.S. Sen. Mike DeWine. Now he's Ohio's Attorney General. His office continued the work begun under his predecessor Richard Cordray and prosecuted Contreras on charges of theft, money laundering, tampering with records and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity. She pleaded guilty June 22.” [WCPO, 8/10/11]

 

Bobby Thompson Identified as John Donald Cody

In October 2012, NBC News reported, “On Monday, federal authorities revealed that Thompson is really John Donald Cody, 65, a 1972 Harvard Law School graduate and Army veteran the FBI had long sought on numerous fraud charges related to a 1987 espionage probe.” [NBC News, 10/1/12]

 

Thompson Now Jailed in Ohio Charged with 22 Counts of Theft, Money Laundering, Tampering with Records, Corruption

In October 2012, NBC News reported, “Thompson is now jailed in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, charged with 22 counts of theft, money laundering, tampering with records, engaging in corrupt activity and other charges. He ran the national charity out of Tampa, Fla., with fake officers and state chapters and opened up numerous bank accounts and rented mailboxes to pull of the scheme, according to Ohio authorities.” [NBC News, 10/1/12]

 

US Marshal Identified Thompson as Cody after Ohio Authorities Arrested Him

In October 2012, NBC News reported, “U.S. Marshal Peter Elliott, head of the task force that found Thompson, said on Monday that he was doing Google searches for fugitives recently when landed on an old FBI wanted poster for Cody. Elliot noticed the man's resemblance to the suspect marshals had nabbed in the Ohio fraud case.” [NBC News, 10/1/12]

 

Bobby Thompson Trial Scheduled to Begin March 11, 2013

 

According to the Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts, the trial of The State of Ohio vs. Bobby Thompson was scheduled to begin on March 11, 2013 at 9:30am at the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth Appellate District. He faces multiple charges of identity fraud, money laundering, and tampering with records. [Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts, accessed 3/11/13

  

If Sabato Is Right, Bolling Hurts McAuliffe

12

(UPDATE: Bill Bolling has announced he will NOT be running! See his statement in the comments section of this blog post. – promoted by lowkell)

by Paul Goldman

UVA Professor Larry Sabato has made it official: if Lt. Governor Bill Bolling tries to make a credible run for governor as a Republican-turned-Independent, he will hurt Democratic Terry McAuliffe.

This is big news. It defies the conventional wisdom. It refutes the push by the state’s “enlightened” right thinking people to get Bolling to run. They have seduced him into believing he is the new magically “moderate” Republican, against the evil conservative Republican. Having spent his political life as the little guy waiting in the wings, they have seduced him with visions of his being the new Lincoln, saving his party for the Whiggery of Cuccinelli. For a little guy (having now lost 40 pounds), finally Bill Bolling finds himself not Bolling Alone.

These folks Bolling to run because they want to use Bolling to kill off Cuccinelli. The AG has no one but himself to blame for the situation as a political matter. He dared Bolling to do it by changing the nomination rules. It was hardball politics. But there was a risk.

However, Sabato says the conventional wisdom and all its worshippers are wrong, that Bolling may not be the anti-Cuccinelli terminator at all. But you ask: Why wasn’t this prediction from the state’s leading political guru reported? My response: It was reported. But Larry said in a respectful, polite manner. He didn’t want to offend anyone, so he did a masterful job of telling the hard truth by concealing it so his friends in the media and the editorial boards wouldn’t get angry with him.  

However, we do 200-proof politics here: We appreciate Larry’s skill, but we prefer to be straight up direct. Fact: The good Dr. has given his diagnosis. He said the following in a recent interview with the Richmond Times Dispatch. If Bolling runs, said the good Professor, the LG “could be a contender….a real contender” as an independent third party candidate.

This was music to the anti-Cuccinelli crowd, they are desperate for Bolling to run. They played this part of the interview up front, in the lead. They are desperate for Bolling to run, so this was the seal of approval from the guru, saying to Bolling: “I think you can win bro.”

But Larry knows the truth: Bolling can’t win.  He never said he could.

So Larry went on to say that ” even if [Bolling doesn’t win], depending on the positions he takes, he could end up hurting Cuccinelli more, or he could end up hurting McAuliffe more.”

On the surface, this seems a little inane for such a brilliant guy: it is like DUH?

However, there is method to the good professor’s madness here.

What he was saying, without saying it, is the following: If Bolling actually were to run a credible race, then LG would not be a net-wash as some polls are predicting. The pollsters are not sure who Bolling would hurt.

But Dr. Sabato already knows. If your read the quote carefully, he said Bolling would hurt:

Terry McAuliffe.

The operative tipoff in Larry’s statement is the phrase “depending on the positions” Bolling takes.

Personally, I think this is far too idealistic view of how politics works. Perception, not platform, is more important. But to the extent Larry is right – positions affect image  – Bolling will hurt McAuliffe.

As we say, do the 200-proof political math.

If Bolling runs a credible campaign, then his positions will by definition be geared to paint him as the “moderate”, pushing Terry to the left and Cuccinelli to the right.

There are two basic sets of issues: non-social and social.

In the non-social category, the GOP base has long been most concerned with the tax issue. It has proven the best for Republicans for decades. Bolling and McAuliffe back the new transportation tax, Cuccinelli does not. Thus K-Man will run as the anti-tax guy against the other two, saying they are the errand boys of the high tax lobby, socking it to the middle class, yada, yada, yada. But you say: McDonnell, a Republican and a whole lot of Republicans in the General Assembly backed the taxes.

My response: So what? The plan that passed isn’t McDonnell’s plan, this would be a different story. He admits it is a compromise. So he and the others back it, Cuccinelli says it is too taxing on the middle class, a discriminatory double-taxing of NOVA, yada, yada, yada. Bollings campaign advisors have made a living for years running the anti-tax game. They know it will capture the GOP anti-tax base.

In my view, some of the tax plan is unconstitutional, which will only fuel the anti-tax fire more in coming months. Net-Net: On the anti-tax right, Bolling is Bowling alone. He gets NOTHING. Moreover, being seen as pro-tax hurts Bowling with connected parts of the GOP base, the limited government voter, the “don’t tread on me voter”, he loses the pro-middle class image. True, he will try to come back on jobs and growth and fixing transportation, yada, yada, yada. BUT THIS IS ALSO TERRY’S TURF as Sabato is saying without saying it.

On the social issues, the base GOP vote considers itself pro-life. This constituency is solidly in Cuccinelli’s corner, and Bolling knows it. This is their key issue. Bolling can’t change is position here or his campaign will become a joke. Thus, what choice does he have but to try to move left of his current position on issues like gay rights, marriage rights, immigration, women’s rights, minority issues, go down the list. Sabato figures Bolling has to try and become the moderate tolerant guy, painting Cuccinelli as intolerant and McAuliffe as too permissive.

Bottom Sabato line: Bolling, be it on social or non-social issues, has to be moving left to run a credible campaign aimed at getting 35% of the vote.

It is strictly a matter of 200-proof political math.

Thus, the Sabato judgment: If Bolling were to actually try to become a real contender, he would have to spend most of his effort pouching on McAuliffe’s turf, not Cuccinelli turf.

Sabato exposes the myth: Bolling right now is an oxymoron, too pro-tax for his former Republicans, too anti-women for his new Democratic friends, and too much the opportunist for thoughtful independents.

Bolling will need to go left consistently to have any chance of winning. This means he will need to take a lot more votes from McAuliffe than Cuccinelli.

Sabato is too nice a guy to tell Bolling the truth straight up: We, on the other hand, don’t have such social graces. Bolling is a myth in his own mind, being manipulated by those who don’t care about him in the least, but view the LG as easy to use and then discard.

Bolling is still a young man. If he is right about Cuccinelli, then the AG will lose big: and if Bolling just stays quiet, he would become the leading 2017 candidate for the GOP GUV nomination.

Professor Sabato is too polite to tell Bolling the truth: do you really have such a “jones” for Cuccinelli that you would destroy your own career to stop a candidate YOU DON’T BELIEVE CAN WIN ANYWAY?

It is such a bizarre notion that I think Dr. Sabato can’t really belief Bolling is going to take the bait.  

Virginia News Headlines: Tuesday Morning

17

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, March 12. Also, the photo is of Democratic AG candidate, Senator Mark Herring, addressing the Henrico County Democratic Committee yesterday.

*Hurt by scandals, papacy’s mystical era may be over (As well it should be…)

*In President’s Outreach to G.O.P., Past Failures Loom (Yeah, good luck with this one!)

*Cantor offers softer GOP message (Still nasty and reactionary, just a bit less so in terms of style? Exciting! LOL)

*Sequester spares a broken program (“The F-35, America’s newest warplane, is the costliest weapons system in history.”)

*A Universal Right to Vote (“New legal protections are needed to expand the guarantee of ballot access in every state.”)

*Goodlatte: Bin Laden son-in-law should have been sent to Guantanamo (Here we go again with the idiocy…)

*Paul Ryan in fantasyland (“Balancing the budget is not his real ambition.” No, this is.)

*Rand Paul masks his true worldview (Agreed, Rand Paul is a paranoid isolationist like his father.)

*Virginia’s Catholic politicians weigh in on papal conclave (Here’s an idea: send Ken Kookinelli to the Vatican, leave Virginia alone!)

*Gubernatorial Candidate McAuliffe to Visit Leesburg

*Cuccinelli must get his act together (According to rabid right wingnut Jennifer Rubin, “there is widespread concern, quite apart from his strident social conservatism that may turnoff suburban moderates, that he still hasn’t put together a compelling message or agenda.” Like what, science denial, banning contraception, returning Virginia to the 1600s?)

*Hurt credits sequestration for stock market, employment reports (Yep, Hurt’s as stupid as we all thought he was.)

*LG race: Dems Chopra, Northam file petitions

*Child care gets a cold shoulder in Va. (“Why does the nurture of the Old Dominion’s tiniest people get less oversight than strip mall nail salons?”)

*School ‘resegregation’ is cited in study (“Analysis shows that nearly 80 percent of Latino students in Northern Virginia were in mostly minority schools in 2010.”)

*Extend Metro to Woodbridge, Fort Belvoir, Centreville? Idea is on table (Fine with me, but ONLY if they pour billions into the existing system, and ONLY if this one’s not a no-bid boondoggle.)

*Lipton to invest $96.2 million in Suffolk tea plant (Now that’s refreshing!)

*Virginia to hold statewide tornado drill March 12

*D.C. area forecast: Showers end around midday; cooler weather comes back Wednesday

Tom Farrell’s Nuclear Fantasy

1

( – promoted by lowkell)

Tom Farrell doesn’t get it. Dominion Power, the utility of which he is CEO, has been all about building natural gas plants for the past couple of years, as it rushes to take advantage of cheap fracked gas. Out with the aging coal plants that had been its first love, in with the next cheap thing, and never mind the pollution! Then suddenly two weeks ago, faced with a question about climate change, Farrell told reporters the answer is more nuclear plants.

Mother Earth to Tom Farrell: The correct answer is “renewable energy.”

Most of the rest of the country gets this. Wind supplied more new electric generation than natural gas did in 2012. More people work in solar energy than in coal mining. Renewable energy has overtaken nuclear worldwide. Almost no one is building nuclear plants, partly because-here’s an inconvenient truth for you, Tom-they cost too much. Almost three years ago a Duke University study found that power from new nuclear plants is more expensive than solar energy, and the cost of solar has only gone down since then.

But Farrell is convinced wind and solar can’t provide reliable electricity to power the whole grid. You’d think he’d been reading propaganda from the Koch Brothers and had come to believe that if there are solar panels somewhere and a cloud crosses the sun, the whole grid crashes.

Can I just point out here that Dominion’s own North Anna nuclear reactors shut down suddenly in 2011 following an earthquake in Virginia, and the grid did not crash? Even though nuclear is one-third of Dominion’s Virginia portfolio, and North Anna represents more than half of that? And even though, while weather forecasters are pretty good at predicting regional cloud cover, no one can yet predict an earthquake?

The reason the grid didn’t crash is that grid operators make sure there is enough surplus generation available to keep supplying power even at times of catastrophic failure. And note that the nuclear plants didn’t come back online when the clouds cleared off, either. They were down for four months.

If nuclear power is more expensive than renewables, and it has to be backed up 100% with other forms of energy, for much longer time periods, where is the place for new nuclear?  

As the CEO of a utility, Tom Farrell should know better. He should also know about the new study demonstrating that renewable energy alone-onshore wind, offshore wind, and solar energy-can power the entire grid 99.9% of the time. The study authors show that doing this would actually cost less than conventional sources of electricity, assuming you include in the price the “external” cost society pays for the use of fossil fuels. That is, if you factor in the cost of climate change, it’s cheaper to build renewable energy than new fossil fuel plants.

Climate aside, there’s other evidence for the superior value of renewable energy in providing price stability for customers and a whole range of benefits for the grid. And of course, for meeting demand at the cheapest possible cost, you can’t beat energy efficiency.

It’s time to face reality, Tom Farrell. If all you care about is making money for Dominion today, your natural gas strategy probably makes sense. But if you care about tomorrow-or even about the big picture today-it doesn’t. Either way, there’s no room in the picture for expensive new nuclear plants.

And if you’re sincerely concerned about climate change, now would be a good time for Dominion to invest in energy efficiency, wind and solar.

Note to readers: Willett Kempton, one of the authors of the study cited above on powering the grid with renewable energy, will be speaking at a townhall meeting sponsored by Sierra Club and Environment America this Wednesday, March 13, at the MetroStage Theatre, 1201 North Royal St., Alexandria, VA. The meeting is open to the public (Tom Farrell is especially invited). To RSVP, contact Phillip Ellis at phillip.ellis@sierraclub.org or 571-970-0275.

Chopra submits 20,600 signatures for ballot access

0

This afternoon, Aneesh Chopra's campaign for Virginia Lieutenant Governor submitted 20,630 petition signatures to qualify for ballot access in the June Democratic Primary. The minimum number of signatures required to appear on the ballot is 10,000. Chopra's campaign also surpassed the requirement of at least 400 signatures from each of the Commonwealth's 11 congressional districts.

“This is a credit to the grassroots network that drives this campaign,” Chopra said upon delivering his petition signatures. “This is just one step along the road to victory, but I am incredibly proud of our efforts across the Commonwealth.”

“Today wouldn't be possible without our dedicated and hardworking supporters and volunteers. I decided to run for Lieutenant Governor because I firmly believe that our state government can be smarter, faster, better, and fairer for all Virginians. This is a message that is resonating across the Commonwealth, and I look forward to engaging with more Virginians on it in the coming months.”

Chopra (20,630), Northam (14,703) Campaigns Hand in Petition Signatures

13

I just received press releases from both the Aneesh Chopra (on the front) and Ralph Northam (on the "flip") for LG campaigns. Congratulations to both candidates for getting on the Democratic primary ballot, and particularly to Aneesh Chopra for his impressive haul of 20,000+ signatures (more than twice the 10k required). According to the Virginia State Board of Elections, today is the first day candidates can submit petition signatures; the last day is March 28 (at 5 pm). Also worth noting is that the State Board of Elections recommends that candidates get at least 15,000 total signatures and 700 for each CD.

 
Chopra submits 20,630 signatures for ballot access
Strong grassroots organization yields more than twice the number of signatures required
 
Richmond, VA – Today, Aneesh Chopra's campaign for Virginia Lieutenant Governor submitted more than 20,630 petition signatures to qualify for ballot access in the June Democratic Primary. The minimum number of signatures required to appear on the ballot is 10,000. Chopra's campaign also surpassed the requirement of at least 400 signatures from each of the Commonwealth's 11 congressional districts.
 
"This is a credit to the grassroots network that drives this campaign," Chopra said upon delivering his petition signatures. "This is just one step along the road to victory, but I am incredibly proud of our efforts across the Commonwealth. Today wouldn't be possible without our dedicated and hardworking supporters and volunteers."
 
"I decided to run for Lieutenant Governor because I firmly believe that our state government can be smarter, faster, better, and fairer for all Virginians. This is a message that is resonating across the Commonwealth, and I look forward to engaging with more Virginians on it in the coming months."

Northam for Lt. Governor

Dear Lowell, 

Today, I am honored to submit 14,703 signatures with the Board of Elections to secure my spot on the Democratic ballot—that is 4,703 more than the necessary number.  More importantly, they come from across the Commonwealth.  We have at least 700 in each of our 11 Congressional districts with thousands of signatures coming from Northern Virginia.

As I think about what it takes to reach this lofty goal, I am truly humbled by your support and your volunteerism.

Collecting 14,703 signatures across the Commonwealth can only mean one thing:  Voters want a new direction in Richmond.  They want a fighter who will stand up for women’s health and against an Attorney General who refuses to acknowledge fact-based medicine.  People are tired of new voter suppression laws intended to discriminate against those who need a voice in government the most.  They want a champion for children who understands that a great education and healthy upbringing will produce the future leaders of our Commonwealth and the backbone of our economy.  That is why I am running for Lieutenant Governor.

Once again, thank you.  Lets keep the momentum going.

Ralph Northam | Democrat for Lt. Governor

Audio: GOP LG Candidate Scott Lingamfelter Rips Susan Stimpson Campaign for Locking Out Voters

0

Gotta love it; the Virginia Republican nominating convention is already degenerating into one of the Republicans’ favorite tactics: preventing people who don’t agree with them from voting. In this case, apparently it’s the Bill Howell-backed LG campaign of Susan Stimpson engaged in something known as “slating.” Check it out, from this morning’s John Frederick Show.

John Frederick: We want to ask you this, Delegate Lingamfelter, explain to our audience, there’s kinds of some scuttlebutt coming down about one of the campaigns getting involved in “slating” delegates, where essentially people who want to sign up being prevented from signing up; we’ve had some criticism of the Susan Stimpson campaign for that around the internet, what exactly does that mean?

Del. Scott Lingamfelter (R): Well, there is a tactic that some campaigns use that really, I think, is counterproductive to what we’re trying to do in the Republican Party…The tactic that’s been employed by the [Susan] Stimpson campaign is one of exclusivity, in other words lock people out who don’t support a particular candidate. And in this case, it appears that that was done in a county down in southwest Virginia, and unfortunately there were…a few people that apparently were excluded who were not there to support Stimpson; a couple of them were mine…the tactic is very anti-Ronald Reagan in my view, which is one that stands against bringing people in…we need to do that now and not pick these silly tactics that the Stimpson campaign clearly seems to me to be behind…It’s very very hurtful to the party…it’s just wrong.

Virginia News Headlines: Monday Morning

0

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Monday, March 11. Also check out the video from Jim Southworth of Democratic House of Delegates candidates Ed Deitsch (running against Dave Albo) and Jennifer Boysko (running against Tom Rust) speaking at the March 7 Brigades meeting.

*Is Congress seeing a break in the partisan ice? (“Just when our politics seemed destined to freeze into a brain-dead brand of partisanship, party lines started cracking up.”)

*Senators encouraged by budget talks (“Appearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Tim Kaine, D-Va., said the two sides are inching closer to a deal that averts a government shutdown and settles once and for all questions on tax rates, domestic and military spending and entitlement benefits.”)

*Top Republican Strategist: GOP ‘Doesn’t Give Equal Opportunity To Women’

*Dissecting Obama’s “War on Coal”

*Bolling could reset race for governor (“U.Va.’s Sabato says bid would give ‘perplexed people a place to go'”)

*Bolling is set to shape Va. election (“How did we get to this point? William T. Bolling trusted the system. He was willing to wait his turn.”)

*In Virginia, decisions on signing bills won’t be easy for Gov. Bob McDonnell

*McDonnell achieves mixed results in trying to reform Virginia’s schools

*Bell’s human-trafficking bill signed into law

*Session disappointing for open-government advocates

*A Republican that Virginia educators like

*Eastern Shore’s drug woes show it’s more than an urban issue

*Metro to consider seeking development partners at properties near 11 stations

*Virginia gets tough after brutal first half to beat Maryland

Cuccinelli, the New Robin Hood?

0

There’s an amusing new meme floating around among conservatives desperate to salvage the sinking ship of Ken Cuccinelli’s gubernatorial campaign — namely, that he is “feared” by the Republican establishment because, while they are propped up by big business and crony capitalism, he is a man of the people, a superhero fighting to unleash liberty!  

Here’s how Mason Conservative put it (favorably quoted by Bearing Drift and Conservative HQ):

Make no mistake; you will never hear this blog claim Bill Bolling is a RINO.  Far from it.  But rather, Bolling is an establishment crony-capitalist conservative who, like his Dixiecrat forefathers, just wants to leave everything the same and let big business do what big business does.  Cuccinelli is looking to apply true limited government principles and truly unleash capitalism in Virginia.  Instead of our business being reliant on the federal government, state tax breaks, and giveaways he wants to create a commonwealth of opportunity and freedom.

You gotta give these guys credit: the Cuccinelli-as-Robin-Hood spin is a gem, and it’s not like they have much to work with.  But sadly, the facts don’t accord with this fairy tale.  

It’s really not that hard to ascertain for whom our Ayatollah General is fighting.  You can start with his donor list.  Clearly, big businesses are not too afraid of him, since they are shoveling hundreds of thousands of dollars in his direction.  Representatives of the fossil fuel industry seem particularly brave in this regard, as evidenced by the $352,341 they’ve given him from 2011 to 2012.  That includes $52k from coal and fracking giant Consol Energy, over $25k from Big Coal company Alpha Natural Resources, $40k from Dominion, over $27k from Appalachian Power Company — and at least $50k from the Koch brothers and their firm Intrust Wealth Management.

You can guarantee that all of these folks are dead set against crony capitalism — and darn sure that Gov. Cuccinelli will be too!  Or perhaps they are just really satisfied with his endless assaults on EPA and climate science, which directly aid their bottom line.  It may be that the nearly $100k he’s received from the health care industry over the same time period has to do with his championing of their bottom line too — vs. those evil bureaucrats who want to eat into their profits by forcing them to treat patients with pre-existing conditions.

If Cuccinelli is truly a scourge of the big business establishment and champion of the little guy, it’s hard to find much evidence of it.  An Attorney General has broad powers to challenge big businesses in court when they disadvantage consumers, employees or the general public.  Sadly, rather than taking on such battles, Cuccinelli has spent his taxpayer-funded time in the AG’s office engaging in jeremiads against the Federal government, climate scientists, gays and women.  It’s hard to find any evidence of him helping any of the people who really need help.

There’s no question, then, that he will continue to be as subservient to the needs of multinational corporations as the rest of his party.  So why have some Republican business leaders been ripping into him?  Put simply, it’s because Cuccinelli is a lousy politician, positioned to lead his ticket to defeat.

Indeed, the whole vaunted “Tea Party vs. the Establishment” battle is not about who’s more “conservative” or more supportive of big business or more serious about balancing the budget.  Rather, it’s a battle between experienced insiders who know (all too well) how to win elections vs. howling-at-the-moon yahoos driven by misinformation and conspiracy theories and willing to make no concessions to reality, common sense or to anyone who doesn’t look or think exactly like them.  

The contrast between Cuccinelli and Gov. McDonnell frames the case perfectly.  Despite his ultraconservative Regent University Master’s thesis proving that he is neither moderate nor mainstream, McDonnell has done a brilliant job in the past four years reframing himself as both.  Bob’s for Jobs, remember?

Cuccinelli, meanwhile, does not seem capable of lowering himself to deal with such earthly concerns as jobs, roads or schools.  And while it’s easier for McDonnell to distance himself from a 20-year-old thesis, how could Cuccinelli distance himself, say, from his 2010 subpoena of Professor Michael Mann, a bizarre document grounded in the darkest, strangest theories of climate change denial?  

In fact, Cuccinelli is a great example of how the GOP has painted itself into a corner by first cozying up to, and then being taken over by, the Tea Party.  Republicans will indeed rue the day they started their flirtation with this scary, extremist movement — a Frankenstein that is still running rampant thanks to the establishment types who breathed life into the monster.

Frankenstein, not Robin Hood — that’s who we’ll be facing this November.  The good news is that this monster’s ugliness is bare and apparent for all to see.  

Big Oil: We’ll Still Hate Obama Even If He Gives Us Keystone XL

1

Those who support climate action but say it’s not worth fighting the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline like to imply that President Obama’s approval of the pipeline would earn him political capital. But the head of one polluter front group would like to assure Washington that whether President Obama approves or rejects Keystone XL, Big Oil will still hate him just as much.

Grist’s David Roberts has extensively documented the Very Serious People BipartisanThink case against #noKXL activists. As Jennifer Yachnin reports in E&E News (sub. req.), a top oil industry lobbyist says they’re wrong – that Big Oil will fight any efforts to cut carbon pollution tooth & nail regardless of President Obama’s Keystone decision:

But [American Energy Alliance and Institute for Energy Research President Thomas] Pyle added that approving the pipeline won’t curb industry criticism of the Obama administration, including over what it sees as efforts to hold back oil and gas production on federal lands.

“I don’t know that it buys him any good will,” Pyle said. “There will be lots of statements of thank you … but ultimately from a political perspective I don’t know that it buys him any room to maneuver.”

And ill will could linger over how much time it has taken the administration to make a final decision on the pipeline, Pyle added.

All the climate-disrupting carbon pollution and not even a thank you from his political enemies? All the more reason President Obama should do the right thing and reject the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.