Home Blog Page 2430

VA Senate Democrats Statement on “Historic Transportation Plan,” “Path to Medicaid Expansion”

0

From the Virginia Senate Democratic Caucus

Va. Senate Democrats Deliver
Historic Transportation Plan, 
Create Path to Medicaid Expansion

Democrats drive passage of the two biggest public policy accomplishments in a generation.

RICHMOND, VA — Today, Virginia Senate Democrats provided the crucial votes to pass a historic transportation reform plan and to put Virginia on a path to essential Medicaid expansion.

Senator Richard L. Saslaw (D-Fairfax) said, “On the two biggest issues this year, Senate Democrats stayed committed to our values and delivered historic legislation. We've delivered the first transportation bill in almost 30 years years and put the Commonwealth on a solid path toward expanding Medicaid.” 

Senator A. Donald McEachin (D-Henrico) said, “Today, Senate Democrats delivered critical priorities to Virginians, with a historic transportation plan and a budget that prioritizes the expansion of Medicaid.”

Medicaid Expansion

 

Senator Janet D. Howell (D-Fairfax) said, “We have put Virginia on a clear path to expanding Medicaid. Isn't it immoral to deprive 400,000 Virginians — our neighbors — of medical insurance? Isn't it immoral to deprive 30,000 Virginians — our neighbors — of good-paying jobs? Isn't it immoral to send the hard-earned money of tax-paying Virginians, that should be coming here, to other states? Today, we have made a wise choice and done the right thing.”

Senator McEachin said, “I'm especially proud of Democrats for driving the debate and providing the leadership to make this happen. The language in this budget means countless Virginia families will soon be able to access essential healthcare. The state will save millions of dollars every year, and we'll create thousands of good jobs. Medicaid expansion makes sense for everyone, and I'm very pleased with the path we put the Commonwealth on today.”

 

Senator Saslaw said, “On the two biggest pro-business bills of this session, Democrats provided the votes necessary for passage. Today, the Senate Democrats passed a budget that puts Virginia on a solid path toward expanding Medicaid, which will generate close to 30,000 good jobs in Virginia. We have to move in this direction.”

 

A Lasting Transportion Solution

By the fifth year, the transportation plan will raise $880 million in new statewide transportation revenue, and an additional $350 million in Northern Virginia and $200 million in Hampton Roads. This plan, HB 2313, is the first major transportation bill to pass in 27 years. It passed the Senate on a vote of 25 to 15.

The Senate Democrats improved the Governor's plan by maintaining the historic link between road users and funding, reducing the diversion of general funds, and giving localities more flexibility. The plan also raises significantly more new revenue.

Senator Saslaw said, “This plan raises enough money to fix our Commonwealth's transportation problems. The plan raises over $880 million per year for state transportation needs, and gives Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads the flexibility they require to solve their unique transportation needs. This conference report represents real compromise on the part of Democrats and Republicans, and real progress for Virginia.”

Senator Howell said, “Senate Democrats fought to improve the transportation plan over the Governor's original proposal – – and we did it, raising more revenue and giving localities more flexibility. By maintaining the tax on gasoline, we preserved the link between the people who use the roads and the people who pay for them. We've reduced the amount money coming out of the general fund by $100 million, and probably $220 million. This is a better plan because we wouldn't settle for less.”

Senator McEachin said, “Senate Democrats were able to provide the 17 votes needed to pass this bill. This is a  serious, long-term solution to a transportation crisis that has been plaguing Virginia for a decade. With this plan passed, the Commonwealth can finally begin long-overdue construction projects and resume long-delayed maintenance.”

“The consensus among Senate Democrats is that the tax on hybrid vehicles is not necessary and discourages behavior we should be encouraging. However, we judged that the benefit of passing a comprehensive plan took precedence this year. Next year, I am certain we will revisit the issue of a punitive tax on hybrid cars,” added Senator McEachin.

Senator Mamie E. Locke (D-Hampton), “I'm going to be proud coming back home to Hampton Roads having voted for this plan. It gives us the funds we need to begin fixing the gridlock that is plaguing our community. Hopefully, this bill will cut down on the use of tolls in Hampton Roads. I'm glad the legislators have decided to finally address this important issue.”

VA Enviro Groups: Transportation Deal “too road-heavy, but it does provide important benefits”

0

Coalition for Smarter Growth, Piedmont Environmental Council, Southern Environmental Law Center, Virginia League of Conservation Voters, Virginia Conservation Network

 

STATEMENT ON PASSAGE OF VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION FUNDING BILL (HB2313)

  

For Immediate Release:                                         Contact:

February 23, 2013                                                   Stewart Schwartz, CSG 

Chris Miller, PEC

Trip Pollard, SELC

Jeff Painter, VALCV   

 

                                                                               

“Our groups pressed for major progress at every step of the legislative process, including pushing for the needs of the Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads regions, funding for local roads, substantially more funding for transit, and most of all – for a meaningful, on-going evaluation of VDOT spending,” said Jeff Painter Executive Director for the Virginia League of Conservation Voters. “While a number of the priorities we recommended were included, such as funding for Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads, for intercity rail, for Dulles Rail, and for road maintenance, there remains a great need for thorough evaluation of how and where all of these new taxpayer dollars will be spent.”

 

The groups noted, that while Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads are given new local revenue sources and the power to direct the funding to local road and transit projects, the arrangement also lets the state off the hook.

 

“Giving localities the responsibility to raise taxes to pay for a limited range of projects, while most existing revenue is diverted to wasteful new highway projects, is not a good deal.  Over the long term, it will result in local tax base, not state transportation revenues, covering the cost of the transportation systems that serve the majority of Virginians,” said Chris Miller, President of The Piedmont Environmental Council.

 

“The compromise the General Assembly adopted is too road-heavy, but it does provide important benefits. Funding for passenger rail, Dulles Rail, and other transit needs are among the most significant positive features of this package,” said Trip Pollard of the Southern Environmental Law Center.  “Virginia has to move toward a more balanced approach that provides greater transportation choices and a cleaner, more efficient system.”

 

“Now that the bill has passed, it will be incumbent upon the legislators and local elected officials to watch-dog how the money is spent; starting with the next update of the state 6-Year Transportation Plan,” said Stewart Schwartz, Executive Director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “Where we spend our tax dollars and whether we are supporting more efficient, smarter growth with our transportation investments should be a central topic of this year's Governors race.”

 

Among the group's concerns about the bill are the following:

 

1) It doesn't commit the state to funding local roads (which it has failed to do for a number of years) and pushes the cost for local roads onto Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads.

 

2) It doesn't require wiser spending by VDOT even as it effectively allows for about $500 million a year in additional highway construction funding for VDOT.

 

Just this week, VDOT took $869 million in GARVEE bonds (out of $1.2 billion authorized statewide in 2011) for Route 460 and the Coalfields Expressway, two of the most wasteful projects to be proposed in Virginia.  Just four proposed projects — Route 460, Coalfields Expressway, Charlottesville Bypass, and the Northern Virginia Outer Beltway — would consume $5.5 billion that could be used for higher priority needs.

BREAKING: Virginia Senate Passes Transportation Deal 25-15

15

I’m watching the debate on the Virginia transportation compromise now. Numerous Senators, both Democrats and Republicans, have stood up and talked about how it isn’t a perfect bill but it’s the “only solution we could come up with,” and that it will help the Commonwealth move forward. In his speech, Senate Democratic leader Dick Saslaw said that the keys to his support are the overall revenue increases and the “regional packages,” which are “desperately needed” in NOVA and Hampton Roads. Senator Barbara Favola (D-Arlington) argued that the bill is “not perfect,” but that we shouldn’t “let the perfect be the enemy of the good,” and that “this is a good plan,” with a “dedicated source of revenue,” with a “real infusion of dollars” to transit, including Metro to Dulles (and that “this is a big deal”). Favola added that since money raised regionally will fund projects within the region. Sen. Donald McEachin emphasized the need for “compromise,” said he agreed with Senators Ebbin and Petersen, but that no better bill is possible today and this will help the transportation situation in Virginia, so he’ll be supporting it.

In announcing his opposition, Senator Chap Petersen stated that the bill was internally contradictory, overly complex (for no good reason), that it wasn’t fair for his constituents to pay higher taxes simply because they live in northern Virginia, and that we should NOT divide up Virginia into areas with higher and lower tax rates. However, Senator Petersen noted that he’s highly likely to be in the minority, and (half jokingly?) noted that if this vote means he’s digging his political grave, then at least “something good will have come out of it.” Senator Adam Ebbin said it “wasn’t an easy decision,” but in the end it’s “bad economics and bad transportation policy,” a “bitter pill.” Why are we, for instance, penalizing people who own clean energy cars instead of incentivizing them? That makes no sense, in Ebbin’s view (and of course he’s right!). Why are we not raising the gas tax to fund transportation? “This bill hurts the people who can least afford it…Virginians should not be forced to pay a higher tax for the clothes on their backs than at the gas pumps…I’ll be voting no.”

Bottom line: I’m told that the Senate WILL pass the bill in a few minutes.

Regarding Medicaid, see here for Julian Walker’s reporting that “Key legislative leaders said this afternoon they have a legal way around the constitutional questions raised about Medicaid expansion by Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli.” So…it appears they may have nailed down a deal to expand Medicaid in the overall context of cutting the transportation deal. Ahh…”sausage making,” isn’t it grand? Yeah, definitely don’t want to watch it, but that’s how government often works.

UPDATE: Here’s a photo of the vote tally. Note that the only three Democrats who voted no were Senators Petersen, Marsh and Ebbin. Republicans voting no were Black, Garrett, Hanger, Martin, McDougle, Newman, Obenshain, Reeves, Smith, Stanley, Stuart and Vogel.

Ken Cuccinelli, kookoo for confrontation, but he might be right on transportation compromise

1

In the world according to Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, any major legislation that smells of bipartisanship must in and of itself be erroneous. After a  transportation deal with support across all political aisles was reached on Wednesday by negotiators in the Virginia House and Senate, Cuccinelli idealogued against its purported components.

Cuccinelli said, “If reports are correct, this new bill contemplates a massive tax increase. In these tough economic times, I do not believe Virginia’s middle class families can afford massive tax increases…” What a “massive tax increase” is in the world of Ken Cuccinelli is open to speculation.

What isn’t open for speculation is Cuccinelli’s every public statement, from this moment until the final vote is cast for Virginia’s next governor, will be a calculated effort to win over the supporters that he’ll need to sit in the Executive Mansion next year (unfortunately for Cuccinelli, his arithmetic isn’t so good).

But if the new taxes coming out of the new transportation bill are true, then Cuccinelli may have a firm ground to stand on, for once. According to one source, the deal would ‘create’ close to $880 million a year once fully transitioned in to address the commonwealth’s new construction and roads maintenance needs. The revenue generated would come from tax increases on wholesale gasoline (don’t have a problem), diesel fuel (don’t have a problem) as well as increases in the state sales tax (have a problem), motor vehicle titling tax (iffy on this one), and audaciously, hybrid vehicle registration fees (I can see hybrid vehicle sales in Virginia already dipping).

Raising taxes on things like gasoline that will go towards repairing roads and new transportation projects makes sense: if so many Virginians didn’t drive, many of these transportation projects wouldn’t be necessary in the first place. Thus the gas taxes serve as a disincentive to drive.

But raising Virginia’s sales tax? Raising vehicle registration fees on vehicles which Virginia should be promoting (i.e., hybrid vehicles)? How do these two schemes make any sense in terms of addressing Virginia’s transportation dilemmas?

So for once in a long time, Cuccinelli and I may agree on an issue, albeit for fundamentally different reasons. The real test for Cuccinelli will be to see how much brain matter he can put behind viable transportation ideas of his own.

Up till now, Cuccinelli has been little more than a naysayer, a reader of the 10 Commandments, “Thou shalt…” Virginia needs vision, not condemnation. It needs leadership, not division.  

How Other States Treat Green Vehicles

12

If the Virginia Senate actually passes the $100 per year Green Car Tax, we would become one of the very first states in the U.S. to use tax policy to DISCOURAGE rather than encourage hybrid, electric and other alternative fuel vehicles.  

While incentives for conventional hybrids have mostly dried up as these cars have become common, incentives for plug-in hybrid and pure electric cars remain widespread.  Here, from Plug In America, are a few examples — focusing, just for fun, on Republican-dominated states:

Louisiana: Tax credit for 50% of cost premium for electric/plug-in hybrid purchase, 50% of conversion cost, or 10% of cost of a new vehicle (max. $3,000) — or can be applied to charging station costs.

South Carolina: Income tax credit equalling 20% of federal credits for electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles.

Utah: Up to $750 credit for electric and plug-in hybrid purchases and up to $2,500 credit for conversions.

Georgia: Income tax credit for up to 20% of electric vehicle cost (max. $5,000) or 10% of conversion cost (max. $2,500), plus carpool lane access. Electric vehicle supply equipment installation tax credit of 10% of cost (max.$2,500).

Arizona: Lower licensing fees and carpool lane access available for electric vehicles and some plug-in hybrids. Tax credit up to $75 for vehicle charging outlet.

Tennessee: $2,500 rebate for first 1,000 vehicles sold in state.

So with this new DISINCENTIVE for green cars, Virginia could go beyond just being one of the worst states in the nation on energy and sustainability policy — and make a serious play to be the absolute worst! Hey, We’re Number One!

Arlingtonians Form New Group to Promote Streetcar

0

Good to see; I hope these folks will be vocal in their support of this vital project for Arlington!

Arlington, VA – A pro-streetcar group, Arlington Streetcar Now, announced its formation at the Arlington County Board meeting on Saturday, February 23. Longtime Arlington resident and civic activist John Snyder made the announcement and presented the Board with a list of principles the group will promote in support of the proposed streetcar system that would link Fairfax County and Alexandra through Columbia Pike and Crystal City.

Arlington Streetcar Now is a growing group of Arlington residents and other strong supporters of the streetcar system. Calling the redevelopment plans for South Arlington “an exciting vision for the future,” Snyder called the streetcar system “the best way to achieve that vision.” Arlington’s vision for Columbia Pike and Crystal City depends on a qualitative upgrade and an increase in transit capacity which cannot be achieved merely by enhancing existing bus service.

Arlington Streetcar Now has been formed, Snyder said, to help “explain how a modern streetcar operates, how it is integral to growth of a locally-oriented business district, to affordable housing preservation on the Pike, and to environmental stewardship.”

Mary Margaret Whipple, former Arlington County Board member and state senator, pointed out that opposition today is similar to resistance to the installation of the Metrorail system in Arlington.  “They made similar claims then – that it cost too much, that we should use buses instead, that kind of thing. It doesn’t matter how sensible or popular a transit proposal is,” said Whipple. “There are always going to be a few people who make it their mission to oppose it.”  Today, Arlington’s investment in the rail system is widely regarded as a principal factor propelling Arlington from a community in economic decline in the 1970s to one of the most desirable locations in the region to live and work.

Local businesses have come out in strong support of this system and the vision for growth and sustainability it represents. Chamber of Commerce member David DeCamp, also a founding member of Arlington Streetcar Now, strongly agrees with the group’s mission. “The investment in the Streetcar will induce mixed-use development and pay us back with growing annual revenues as new buildings are developed – in much the same way that development along Arlington’s Metro corridors has produced a virtuous circle of growing tax receipts that keep a lid on our tax rates and contribute enormously to the quality of life in Arlington.”

Arlington Streetcar Now can be found at www.streetcarnow.org and on Facebook and Twitter. 

Virginia News Headlines: Saturday Morning

2

(I just tweeted: “Only 4-6 #Virginia Sen. GOPers for @BobMcDonnell’s transpo bill means McD needs 15-17 Dems (out of 20). Better hold out on #Medicaid, Dems!!” – promoted by lowkell)

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, February 23. Also, check out President Obama’s weekly address, in which he urges Congressional Republicans to stop threatening the economy and to fix “sequestration” by passing a balanced plan of revenues and spending cuts.

*Top Dems Reject House GOP’s Violence Against Women Act: ‘Simply Unacceptable’ (“Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the author of VAWA, derided the legislation as ‘partisan’ and said it omits critical measures designed to protect vulnerable populations like Native Americans, immigrants and the gay and lesbian community.”)

*Kaine says he’s optimistic for sequester deal (We’ll see…)

*Get back to work on military matters (“Absent agreement in Congress next week on federal budget cuts, Hampton Roads will be forced into an austerity mode it hasn’t seen in decades.”)

*Rick Scott bows to reality in Medicaid decision (If freakin’ Rick Freakin’ Scott can do it, then Transvaginal Bob can too! LOL)

*McAuliffe a factor in House transportation vote (T-Mac’s campaign must have calculated that this will help him politically, positioning him as a “reasonable” “centrist” in contrast to far-right-wing Cuckoo. I sure hope his campaign is right, that’s all I can say!)

*Speaker to delegates: road vote won’t cost you re-election (Let me get this straight: Democrats are handing Bob McDonnell a “legacy” by providing crucial votes for a mediocre-at-best transportation plan, and in return they won’t even be helped politically in November? Wow, that sounds…[fill in your own snarky adjective here]!)

*Is the proposed Medicaid panel constitutional?

*Senate Adjourns Without Voting on Highways Bill

*Senate postpones transportation vote; Democrats seek agreement on Medicaid (“‘There’s some dissatisfaction with the transportation plan anyway, so it’s key that we have that Medicaid expansion’ agreement, said Sen. Janet Howell, D-Fairfax County, a Senate budget negotiator.”)

*State budget negotiators working on Medicaid compromise

*House of Delegates passes transportation compromise

*Va. transportation plan clears House, stalls in Senate (“…several senators said the governor had agreed Thursday night to go along with the Medicaid compromise to pave the way for the transportation bill.”)

*House District #43 (The latest in NLS’ continuing series on Virginia HoD districts…)

*Some GOP delegates favor over-the-counter birth control

*Gun initiatives short of what’s necessary

*General Assembly toughens penalties for straw gun purchasers (That’s fine, but it’s also wildly inadequate to what is needed.)

*Conferees reach tentative deal on statewide school division funds

*Senator Warner encourages Chesapeake City Council to ‘reconsider’ rezoning

*Two Va. congressional offices evacuated due to suspicious letters

FCDC: “Hans von Spakovsky not reappointed to Electoral Board”

0

Not Larry Sabato broke this story earlier today, but here’s a press release from the Fairfax County Democratic Committee:

Fairfax Judges Put Voters First
Hans von Spakovsky not reappointed to Electoral Board

FALLS CHURCH – Today the judges of the Fairfax County Circuit Court took a major step forward in protecting the rights of citizens of Fairfax County to vote.

“I applaud the decision of the Fairfax County Circuit Court judges in declining to reappoint Hans von Spakovsky to the County Electoral Board,” said Cesar del Aguila, Chair of the Fairfax County Democratic Committee. “By their action they have put the rights of the voters of Fairfax County to a fair and impartial administration of our election first. Von Spakovsky is a well-known national advocate for voter suppression efforts and a promoter of fictitious voter fraud fears. Without von Spakovsky, who was recommended for a second term by the Fairfax County Republican Party, our Electoral Board can return to acting on a bi-partisan basis to protect the rights of all citizens of Fairfax County to vote.”

View the Fairfax County Democrats’ letter to the Circuit Court regarding von Spakovsky:
http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Letter-to-Judge-Smith-re-Hans.pdf

View the Court Order regarding today’s appointment:
http://fairfaxdemocrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Court-Order-Electoral-Board-Appointment.pdf

Two Good Answers by Terry McAuliffe, on Gay Marriage and Clean Energy

4

Recently, Terry McAuliffe tried out the Google Moderate service with some Virginia YD’s, who posted questions online. I thought that two of T-Mac’s answers – on two very important issues – were worth passing along, as they are excellent. They are also a stark contrast with Ken Cuccinelli, a homophobe, opponent of clean energy, and climate science denier, among his many other faults. The questions and answers are as follows.

1. Isaac Sarver of Dublin, VA asked, “What is your position on gay marriage and benefits for same-sex couples in the Commonwealth?”

Terry McAuliffe responded:

As I’ve said throughout this campaign, my focus as Governor is going to be creating jobs and growing the economy instead of divisive proposals of some in Richmond. I believe everyone should be treated fairly. I personally favor civil marriage for committed couples of the same-sex. I understand that this is an issue that Virginians of goodwill come down on both sides of and it is an issue where, like many Virginians, my views have changed from earlier in my life. Regardless of where you stand on this issue, one thing Dorothy and I consistently hear is that people are tired of issues like this being used to divide people especially when we face such important economic challenges here in Virginia.

Couple other important things: 1. To address some legitimate concerns, I don’t think any church should be forced to sanction anything they disagree with and 2. Realistically, this is not something that the current legislative leadership is likely to consider.

2. The other Q&A I wanted to pass along was from Meg Czaikoski of Woodbridge, who asked, “How do you respond to industries who try to argue that we have to choose between jobs and clean energy?”

Terry McAuliffe responded:

Thank you Meg. As your question implies, this is a false choice. Jobs are going to be in sectors like clean energy. We know that demand for clean energy and energy efficiency are going to continue to climb so Virginia should be a leader in those efforts. I’ve said many, many times that I think we should join other states in making our Renewable Portfolio Standard mandatory. Wind power offshore is one way to move forward. A group of Virginia researchers estimated that even if we limited ourselves to some specific parcels, we could generate around 10% of Virginia’s electricity needs and be cost-competitive – and generate something like 10,000 jobs. If you’ve heard me speak, you know that I often talk about jobs of the future and what I mean is that Virginia needs to be thinking about not just what jobs we can create now but what jobs we will need to be creating in 20 or 30 years. We know that if Virginia is a leader in clean energy now, we will be ahead of the curve and provide long-term growth for our economy down the road. Thank you for asking. -Terry

BREAKING: Virginia House Passes Transportation Compromise, 60-40

42

(NOTE TO SENATE DEMOCRATS: Before you guys leave town, you need to make 100% sure that you get Bob McDonnell’s agreement, in WRITING (and also publicly), to expand Medicaid. End of story. – promoted by lowkell)

Just a few minutes ago, the Virginia House of Delegates passed, by a 60-40 vote margin, the transportation compromise reached earlier this week (and that we’ve discussed intensively here at Blue Virginia). Personally, I would have voted against this bill unless two parts were fixed and/or strengthened: 1) the $100 fee on hybrid vehicles is utterly absurd, totally bass-ackwards as the expression goes; and 2) I would want much stronger assurances that any new transportation revenues would be spent on environmentally friendly, smart growth, sustainable transportation solutions and not on more sprawl-inducing highway boondoggles from hell. In addition, House Democrats needed to use this bill for leverage on Medicaid expansion. I’m disappointed they didn’t do that, really don’t understand why they didn’t play hardball, and am 100% certain Republicans would have done just that if the shoe had been on the other foot. Sigh… {UPDATE: Is a a “deal in the works” on Medicaid after all? Let’s hope!}

Anyway, now on to the State Senate, where I’m hoping (but not holding my breath) that the issues noted above will be addressed.

P.S. It turns out that Republicans could only muster 34 of the 51 votes they needed to pass this bill. In other words, Democrats gave then 25 of their 32 votes to pass this bill, without getting anything in return on Medicaid, the $100 hybrid fee, or whatever. I’m baffled; what am missing here?!?

UPDATE: Here are the “yeas” and “nays”.

Yea: Albo; Hodges; Marshall, D.W.; Scott, J.M.; BaCote; Hope; May; Sherwood; Brink; Iaquinto; McClellan; Sickles; Bulova; Ingram; McQuinn; Spruill; Cosgrove; James; Merricks; Stolle; Cox, M.K.; Jones; Minchew; Torian; Dance; Keam; Morris; Toscano; Dudenhefer; Kilgore; O’Bannon; Tyler; Edmunds; Knight; Orrock; Villanueva; Filler-Corn; Kory; Plum; Ware, O.; Greason; Krupicka; Poindexter; Watson; Head; LeMunyon; Purkey; Watts; Helsel; Lewis; Putney; Yancey; Herring; Lopez; Rust; Yost; Hester; Loupassi; Scott, E.T.; Mr. Speaker

Nay: Anderson; Fariss; Lingamfelter; Ransone; Bell, Richard P.; Farrell; Marshall, R.G.; Robinson; Bell, Robert B.; Garrett; Massie; Rush; Byron; Gilbert; Miller; Surovell; Carr; Habeeb; Morefield; Tata; Cline; Howell, A.T.; Morrissey; Ward; Cole; Hugo; O’Quinn; Ware, R.L.; Comstock; Joannou; Peace; Webert; Cox, J.A.; Johnson; Pogge; Wilt; Crockett-Stark; Landes; Ramadan; Wright

UPDATE 3:12 pm: I’m hearing definitively that a deal on Medicaid expansion most certainly WAS an integral part of why many House Dems voted for the transportation deal. Now, the key is to make sure that deal is locked in, that McDonnell doesn’t renege or backtrack, and that the Senate make that absolutely clear before they agree to vote for this legislation!