Home Blog Page 2448

Virginia Senate Elections Committee Kills GOP Electoral Vote Rigging Scheme

2

Good news, but just remember, the only way to make sure this doesn’t come back next year and thereafter is to make sure we win elections, first and foremost the one for governor of Virginia this year.

DPVA Chair, Del. Herring Commends Senate P&E Rejection of Electoral College Changes

RICHMOND — Just moments ago the Senate Privileges & Elections Committee voted to kill legislation aimed at dividing Electoral Votes by congressional district.

“I commend the members of Senate Privileges & Elections Committee that voted to reject a bill to allot Virginia’s Electoral Votes by congressional district,” said Delegate Charniele Herring. “We deserve fair representation across the Commonwealth not legislation aimed at dividing Virginians.

“Republicans in the legislature should focus on creating jobs and fixing the transportation problem plaguing Virginia instead of trying to rig elections in their favor.”

Video: President Obama “now is the time” for “common-sense, comprehensive immigration reform”

1



I couldn’t agree more. Let’s fix this country’s broken immigration system, and let’s not let another year, or 10 years, or whatever go by without fixing it. With Republicans realizing that they are toast at the national level if they keep alienating the fastest growing ethnic groups in America, perhaps the political forces will result in THIS effort being more successful than previous efforts. For the millions of people suffering under the current, screwed-up system, let’s hope so. Having said that, though, we have to do this right, and that means a reasonable path to citizenship, not one that takes decades or whatever. It also means maintaining secure borders, while recognizing that…actually, our borders are more secure than they’ve ever been, while “illegal immigration” is at its lowest level in many, many years. So, let’s not let the perfect be the enemy of the good, but let’s do this right, and let’s get it done!

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT

ON COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM

Del Sol High School

Las Vegas, Nevada

11:40 A.M. PST

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you!  (Applause.)  Thank you!  Thank you so much.  (Applause.)  It is good to be back in Las Vegas!  (Applause.)  And it is good to be among so many good friends.

Let me start off by thanking everybody at Del Sol High School for hosting us.  (Applause.)  Go Dragons!  Let me especially thank your outstanding principal, Lisa Primas.  (Applause.)

There are all kinds of notable guests here, but I just want to mention a few.  First of all, our outstanding Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, is here.  (Applause.)  Our wonderful Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar.  (Applause.)  Former Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis.  (Applause.)  Two of the outstanding members of the congressional delegation from Nevada, Steve Horsford and Dina Titus.  (Applause.)  Your own mayor, Carolyn Goodman.  (Applause.)

But we also have some mayors that flew in because they know how important the issue we’re going to talk about today is.  Marie Lopez Rogers from Avondale, Arizona.  (Applause.)  Kasim Reed from Atlanta, Georgia.  (Applause.)  Greg Stanton from Phoenix, Arizona.  (Applause.)  And Ashley Swearengin from Fresno, California.  (Applause.)

And all of you are here, as well as some of the top labor leaders in the country.  And we are just so grateful.  Some outstanding business leaders are here as well.  And of course, we’ve got wonderful students here, so I could not be prouder of our students.  (Applause.)

Now, those of you have a seat, feel free to take a seat.  I don’t mind.

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  I love you, Mr. President!

THE PRESIDENT:  I love you back.  (Applause.)

Now, last week, I had the honor of being sworn in for a second term as President of the United States.  (Applause.)  And during my inaugural address, I talked about how making progress on the defining challenges of our time doesn’t require us to settle every debate or ignore every difference that we may have, but it does require us to find common ground and move forward in common purpose.  It requires us to act.  

I know that some issues will be harder to lift than others.  Some debates will be more contentious.  That’s to be expected.  But the reason I came here today is because of a challenge where the differences are dwindling; where a broad consensus is emerging; and where a call for action can now be heard coming from all across America.  I’m here today because the time has come for common-sense, comprehensive immigration reform.  (Applause.)  The time is now.  Now is the time.  Now is the time.  Now is the time.

AUDIENCE:  Sí se puede!  Sí se puede!

THE PRESIDENT:  Now is the time.  

I’m here because most Americans agree that it’s time to fix a system that’s been broken for way too long.  I’m here because business leaders, faith leaders, labor leaders, law enforcement, and leaders from both parties are coming together to say now is the time to find a better way to welcome the striving, hopeful immigrants who still see America as the land of opportunity.  Now is the time to do this so we can strengthen our economy and strengthen our country’s future.

Think about it — we define ourselves as a nation of immigrants.  That’s who we are — in our bones.  The promise we see in those who come here from every corner of the globe, that’s always been one of our greatest strengths.  It keeps our workforce young.  It keeps our country on the cutting edge.  And it’s helped build the greatest economic engine the world has ever known.

After all, immigrants helped start businesses like Google and Yahoo!.  They created entire new industries that, in turn, created new jobs and new prosperity for our citizens.  In recent years, one in four high-tech startups in America were founded by immigrants.  One in four new small business owners were immigrants, including right here in Nevada — folks who came here seeking opportunity and now want to share that opportunity with other Americans.

But we all know that today, we have an immigration system that’s out of date and badly broken; a system that’s holding us back instead of helping us grow our economy and strengthen our middle class.  

Right now, we have 11 million undocumented immigrants in America; 11 million men and women from all over the world who live their lives in the shadows.  Yes, they broke the rules.  They crossed the border illegally.  Maybe they overstayed their visas.  Those are facts.  Nobody disputes them.  But these 11 million men and women are now here.  Many of them have been here for years.  And the overwhelming majority of these individuals aren’t looking for any trouble.  They’re contributing members of the community.  They’re looking out for their families.  They’re looking out for their neighbors.  They’re woven into the fabric of our lives.  

Every day, like the rest of us, they go out and try to earn a living.  Often they do that in a shadow economy — a place where employers may offer them less than the minimum wage or make them work overtime without extra pay.  And when that happens, it’s not just bad for them, it’s bad for the entire economy.  Because all the businesses that are trying to do the right thing — that are hiring people legally, paying a decent wage, following the rules — they’re the ones who suffer.   They’ve got to compete against companies that are breaking the rules.  And the wages and working conditions of American workers are threatened, too.

So if we’re truly committed to strengthening our middle class and providing more ladders of opportunity to those who are willing to work hard to make it into the middle class, we’ve got to fix the system.

We have to make sure that every business and every worker in America is playing by the same set of rules.  We have to bring this shadow economy into the light so that everybody is held accountable — businesses for who they hire, and immigrants for getting on the right side of the law.  That’s common sense.  And that’s why we need comprehensive immigration reform.  (Applause.)    

There’s another economic reason why we need reform.  It’s not just about the folks who come here illegally and have the effect they have on our economy.  It’s also about the folks who try to come here legally but have a hard time doing so, and the effect that has on our economy.

Right now, there are brilliant students from all over the world sitting in classrooms at our top universities.  They’re earning degrees in the fields of the future, like engineering and computer science.  But once they finish school, once they earn that diploma, there’s a good chance they’ll have to leave our country.  Think about that.

Intel was started with the help of an immigrant who studied here and then stayed here.  Instagram was started with the help of an immigrant who studied here and then stayed here.  Right now in one of those classrooms, there’s a student wrestling with how to turn their big idea — their Intel or Instagram — into a big business.  We’re giving them all the skills they need to figure that out, but then we’re going to turn around and tell them to start that business and create those jobs in China or India or Mexico or someplace else?  That’s not how you grow new industries in America.  That’s how you give new industries to our competitors.   That’s why we need comprehensive immigration reform.  (Applause.)

Now, during my first term, we took steps to try and patch up some of the worst cracks in the system.

First, we strengthened security at the borders so that we could finally stem the tide of illegal immigrants.  We put more boots on the ground on the southern border than at any time in our history.  And today, illegal crossings are down nearly 80 percent from their peak in 2000.  (Applause.)

Second, we focused our enforcement efforts on criminals who are here illegally and who endanger our communities.  And today, deportations of criminals is at its highest level ever.  (Applause.)

And third, we took up the cause of the DREAMers — (applause) — the young people who were brought to this country as children, young people who have grown up here, built their lives here, have futures here.  We said that if you’re able to meet some basic criteria like pursuing an education, then we’ll consider offering you the chance to come out of the shadows so that you can live here and work here legally, so that you can finally have the dignity of knowing you belong.

But because this change isn’t permanent, we need Congress to act — and not just on the DREAM Act.  We need Congress to act on a comprehensive approach that finally deals with the 11 million undocumented immigrants who are in the country right now.  That’s what we need.  (Applause.)

Now, the good news is that for the first time in many years, Republicans and Democrats seem ready to tackle this problem together.  (Applause.)  Members of both parties, in both chambers, are actively working on a solution.  Yesterday, a bipartisan group of senators announced their principles for comprehensive immigration reform, which are very much in line with the principles I’ve proposed and campaigned on for the last few years.  So at this moment, it looks like there’s a genuine desire to get this done soon, and that’s very encouraging.

But this time, action must follow.  (Applause.)  We can’t allow immigration reform to get bogged down in an endless debate.  We’ve been debating this a very long time.  So it’s not as if we don’t know technically what needs to get done.  As a consequence, to help move this process along, today I’m laying out my ideas for immigration reform.  And my hope is that this provides some key markers to members of Congress as they craft a bill, because the ideas I’m proposing have traditionally been supported by both Democrats like Ted Kennedy and Republicans like President George W. Bush.  You don’t get that matchup very often.  (Laughter.)  So we know where the consensus should be.

Now, of course, there will be rigorous debate about many of the details, and every stakeholder should engage in real give and take in the process.  But it’s important for us to recognize that the foundation for bipartisan action is already in place.  And if Congress is unable to move forward in a timely fashion, I will send up a bill based on my proposal and insist that they vote on it right away.  (Applause.)

So the principles are pretty straightforward.  There are a lot of details behind it.  We’re going to hand out a bunch of paper so that everybody will know exactly what we’re talking about.  But the principles are pretty straightforward.

First, I believe we need to stay focused on enforcement.  That means continuing to strengthen security at our borders.  It means cracking down more forcefully on businesses that knowingly hire undocumented workers.  To be fair, most businesses want to do the right thing, but a lot of them have a hard time figuring out who’s here legally, who’s not.  So we need to implement a national system that allows businesses to quickly and accurately verify someone’s employment status.  And if they still knowingly hire undocumented workers, then we need to ramp up the penalties.

Second, we have to deal with the 11 million individuals who are here illegally.  We all agree that these men and women should have to earn their way to citizenship.  But for comprehensive immigration reform to work, it must be clear from the outset that there is a pathway to citizenship.  (Applause.)

We’ve got to lay out a path — a process that includes passing a background check, paying taxes, paying a penalty, learning English, and then going to the back of the line, behind all the folks who are trying to come here legally.  That’s only fair, right?  (Applause.)

So that means it won’t be a quick process but it will be a fair process.  And it will lift these individuals out of the shadows and give them a chance to earn their way to a green card and eventually to citizenship.  (Applause.)

And the third principle is we’ve got to bring our legal immigration system into the 21st century because it no longer reflects the realities of our time.  (Applause.)  For example, if you are a citizen, you shouldn’t have to wait years before your family is able to join you in America.  You shouldn’t have to wait years.  (Applause.)

If you’re a foreign student who wants to pursue a career in science or technology, or a foreign entrepreneur who wants to start a business with the backing of American investors, we should help you do that here.  Because if you succeed, you’ll create American businesses and American jobs.  You’ll help us grow our economy.  You’ll help us strengthen our middle class.

So that’s what comprehensive immigration reform looks like:  smarter enforcement; a pathway to earned citizenship; improvements in the legal immigration system so that we continue to be a magnet for the best and the brightest all around the world.  It’s pretty straightforward.  

The question now is simple:  Do we have the resolve as a people, as a country, as a government to finally put this issue behind us?  I believe that we do.  I believe that we do.  (Applause.)  I believe we are finally at a moment where comprehensive immigration reform is within our grasp.

But I promise you this:  The closer we get, the more emotional this debate is going to become.  Immigration has always been an issue that inflames passions.  That’s not surprising.  There are few things that are more important to us as a society than who gets to come here and call our country home; who gets the privilege of becoming a citizen of the United States of America.  That’s a big deal.

When we talk about that in the abstract, it’s easy sometimes for the discussion to take on a feeling of “us” versus “them.”  And when that happens, a lot of folks forget that most of “us” used to be “them.”  We forget that.  (Applause.)  

It’s really important for us to remember our history.  Unless you’re one of the first Americans, a Native American, you came from someplace else.  Somebody brought you.  (Applause.)

Ken Salazar, he’s of Mexican American descent, but he points that his family has been living where he lives for 400 years, so he didn’t immigrate anywhere.  (Laughter.)

The Irish who left behind a land of famine.  The Germans who fled persecution.  The Scandinavians who arrived eager to pioneer out west.  The Polish.  The Russians.  The Italians.  The Chinese.  The Japanese.  The West Indians.  The huddled masses who came through Ellis Island on one coast and Angel Island on the other.  (Applause.)  All those folks, before they were “us,” they were “them.”

And when each new wave of immigrants arrived, they faced resistance from those who were already here.  They faced hardship.  They faced racism.  They faced ridicule.  But over time, as they went about their daily lives, as they earned a living, as they raised a family, as they built a community, as their kids went to school here, they did their part to build a nation.

They were the Einsteins and the Carnegies.  But they were also the millions of women and men whose names history may not remember, but whose actions helped make us who we are; who built this country hand by hand, brick by brick.  (Applause.)  They all came here knowing that what makes somebody an American is not just blood or birth, but allegiance to our founding principles and the faith in the idea that anyone from anywhere can write the next great chapter of our story.

And that’s still true today.  Just ask Alan Aleman.  Alan is here this afternoon — where is Alan?  He’s around here — there he is right here.  (Applause.)  Alan was born in Mexico.  (Applause.)  He was brought to this country by his parents when he was a child.  Growing up, Alan went to an American school, pledged allegiance to the American flag, felt American in every way — and he was, except for one:  on paper.  

In high school, Alan watched his friends come of age — driving around town with their new licenses, earning some extra cash from their summer jobs at the mall.  He knew he couldn’t do those things.  But it didn’t matter that much.  What mattered to Alan was earning an education so that he could live up to his God-given potential.

Last year, when Alan heard the news that we were going to offer a chance for folks like him to emerge from the shadows — even if it’s just for two years at a time — he was one of the first to sign up.  And a few months ago he was one of the first people in Nevada to get approved.  (Applause.)  In that moment, Alan said, “I felt the fear vanish.  I felt accepted.”

So today, Alan is in his second year at the College of Southern Nevada.  (Applause.)  Alan is studying to become a doctor.  (Applause.)  He hopes to join the Air Force.  He’s working hard every single day to build a better life for himself and his family.  And all he wants is the opportunity to do his part to build a better America.  (Applause.)  

So in the coming weeks, as the idea of reform becomes more real and the debate becomes more heated, and there are folks who are trying to pull this thing apart, remember Alan and all those who share the same hopes and the same dreams.  Remember that this is not just a debate about policy.  It’s about people.  It’s about men and women and young people who want nothing more than the chance to earn their way into the American story.

Throughout our history, that has only made our nation stronger.  And it’s how we will make sure that this century is the same as the last:  an American century welcoming of everybody who aspires to do something more, and who is willing to work hard to do it, and is willing to pledge that allegiance to our flag.            

Thank you.  God bless you.  And God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)

Video: Bob McDonnell Says Remaining as AG While Running for Gov Not “Fair to You, the Taxpayer”

2



Not that Ken Cuccinelli cares what anyone thinks, but Gov. McDonnell, Jerry Kilgore, Jim Gilmore, etc, etc. all resigned as Virginia Attorney General while running for governor. Why should Cuccinelli be any different? Got me, except he apparently thinks he’s speeeeeeecial. 😉

EXCLUSIVE: Ohio Dem Party Women’s Caucus Director Hired as New DPVA Executive Director

1

Meet your new Democratic Party of Virginia Executive Director, who will be starting her new job within days.

Lauren Harmon, Women’s Caucus Director

Lauren Harmon joined the Ohio Democratic Party as Women’s Caucus Director in June of 2011. She brings with her years of fundraising and campaign experience from Arizona and the Southwest. After getting her start as a field organizer and running field programs in Republican districts, Lauren went on to manage and lobby on behalf of a statewide Building Trades political action committee. She later served as Senior Deputy Finance Director for the Arizona Democratic Party. Lauren has managed campaigns from city council to Attorney General, including her most recent position running the campaign of an EMILY’s List candidate for Las Vegas City Council.

Harmon certainly has an impressive LinkedIn profile, with basically all the main attributes you’d want in an executive director of a major state party: finance/fundraising experience, campaign management experience, field experience, knowledge of PACs, etc. I wish Lauren Harmon the best of luck in her new job, and sincerely look forward to her work in rebuilding this party – along with top-notch people like DPVA Political Director Clark Mercer, who is doing a great job, by the way – and kicking serious Republican tail in 2013 and beyond! 🙂

P.S. In the video, Harmon speaks at the beginning briefly, and then at the end at more length. She seems very impressive.

McDonnell’s failing grade: Is a statewide division constitutional?

0

by Paul Goldman

While well-meaning, the controversial Opportunity Educational Institution legislation introduced by Governor McDonnell seems to run  counter to the Virginia constitution. The ends never justify the means in these kinds of situations, that is what Republicans once believed. But not so much lately. Fortunately, James Madison and others decide to run Virginia according to a constitution. Yeah, I know: the rule of law is so well….20th century….a real pain when you are sure you are right. I understand.

McD's legislation is aimed at allowing the creation of  a statewide board 11 individuals – 4 GA members and 7 ordinary mortals appointed by the governor – to run schools denied state accreditation for two straight years. The board would take over management of the schools, presumably get them in shape and then the local board from which they were taken can ask to get them back.

As a matter of generic educational policy, this McDonnell initiative is clearly aimed at trying to improve a struggling school. One can't really argue with the position of "try something new for gosh sakes" if you are dealing with a chronically bad situation. I applaud his concern.

BUT:  The concept of "local control of education" is a very dear and near one to Virginia, indeed it is suppose to be to Republicans particularly. But the governor no doubt sees his OEI as a way to create a charter school-lite type of situation to help these schools. Again, I don't have any problem per se with charter schools, indeed was the only Democrat willing to publicly help the one in Richmond – now a great success – get its charter, even helped write the original version of the charter. A charter school is still a public school, people forget that.

BUT: All this good stuff, good intentions does not obviate the need to follow the Virginia constitution. The operative part of the constitution in this situation reads in pertinent part as such:

Article VIII, Section 5. Powers and duties of the Board of Education.

The powers and duties of the Board of Education shall be as follows:

*(a) Subject to such criteria and conditions as the General Assembly may prescribe, the Board shall divide the Commonwealth into school divisions of such geographical area and school-age population as will promote the realization of the prescribed standards of quality, and shall periodically review the adequacy of existing school divisions for this purpose. 

Historically, every county and independent city in Virginia has had one school division. But technically, as a matter of constitutional law, each county and city is not legally entitled to its own school division, this has been a division of the state done by the Board of Education. In theory therefore, no county or city has a legal right to their own school board, it has been as a matter of political necessity, demanded by General Assembly members or they would get defeated for re-election by angry local residents.

According, it would seem – I say seem –  the General Assembly would have the power – if it wanted to take the political heat – to create by law "such criteria and conditions" as it my prescribe to create  a statewide school division and give that school division certain schools based on said criteria and conditions. However, the operative word is "seem" since the creation of a statewide school division would seem to fly in the face of the constitutional language "such geographical area and school-age population" etc. etc.

Why? What McDonnell is claiming to have – or precisely what is claiming the General Assembly can do – is pass such criteria and conditions that allows for the creation of a statewide school division: ipso facto as the lawyers say, this is not creating a division to serve a "geographical area" of school age population but rather merely using the whole state as a geographic area per se. 

Or put another way: If you read the constitution to give the GA the power to create a statewide school division for struggling schools, then you per se read it as giving the GA the power to put all the schools in the state under state management, or all the schools in a particular city, for whatever reason the GA may later decide. It is the kind of expansive state power conservatives would decry if proposed by a Democrat.

Moreover, under the Governor's view of the constitution, what is to stop a Board of Education from using his legislation to order the takeover of any school, since the basis of this takeover is lack of accreditation. Those standards can change by administrative decision of the folks running the accreditation program.What is accredited today can be unaccredited tomorrow.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL POINT BEING: The constitution does not contemplate the state running any local schools, nor is there anything to suggest anyone has ever considered this part of the state constitution.

The constitutional language intends for the Board of Education to divide the running of schools among the localities of the state, leaving open the issue of the precise boundaries. That these boundaries have historically coincided with county and city lines is, admittedly, not required by the constitution.

So I will concede the ED Board's power to carve things differently…up to a point however. They can't use the power to create geographic divisions to in effect put everything in one big statewide division that represents not an area of the state but the whole thing. 

By definition, if you create a school division whose geographical boundaries are the same as the statewide wide boundaries, then you have not divided up the state at all, rather the Board of Education has in effect taken over the local school system.

But you say: "Paul, these are only 4 schools around the state, out of thousands, and they need some real help. What's the big rub, constitutionally, no one is saying take over everything?"

The rub: precedent. The governor is saying the Board of Education would have that power if so empowered by the GA in a law signed by him. He is claiming an expansive state power for the state government that is not there in the VA constitution. I thought conservatives saw the constitution as a check on state government power. That's why it is the rule of law, not men. 

As a matter of educational policy, coming up with a new way to solve an old, chronic problem is jake with me in terms of "don't just sit there, do something if you can" common sense. School Boards around the state have situations seemingly too difficult for them to handle: getting some expertise from the outside is a good thing in many circumstances, Virginia should have something in place to make that happen even pressure local school boards to reach out.

But short of a constitutional amendment, the governor and the GA need to do it according to the constitution, not their own desires.

Bottom line: The VA constitution is written, and this is not a matter of debate, to provide for local control of education. It is written to have local school divisions run by local boards either appointed by locally elected officials or through local elections. This is not my speculation, this is 200 plus years of history.

The GA has the power, under the constitution, to create criteria that will either require local boards to seek state help with certain struggling schools, or allow the Board of Education to create a second local school board to run a failing school in that local district with the state legislation fixing the membership of that board. It could create a regional school board for that purpose as it has with Governor's Schools.

That is to say: It can divide up the state in geographic areas that make sense, but it can't just create a statewide geographic area since this, by definition, divides nothing.

The governor should amend his legislation to reflect this constitutional imperative: it would have the extra value of being more politically attractive.

Right now, he is claiming state power to run whatever local schools the GA passes legislation to allow a group of legislators and non-local statewide folks to run. That is not the VA constitution.

It is well meaning to fix a failing school – it is necessary to fix it – but the ends to do not justify the means under the VA constitution.

Virginia News Headlines: Tuesday Morning

0

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, January 29. Also, click on the image to “embiggen;” that pretty sums up the utter hypocrisy of Republicans regarding Benghazi. We might also add the 1983 U.S. Marine barracks bombing in Beirut under President Reagan, where 241 U.S. servicemen were killed, yet to my recollection no Democrats accused Reagan or his administration of…whatever it is crazy Teapublicans are accusing Obama, Clinton, Rice et al of regarding Benghazi. Of course, it’s OK if you’re a Republican…

*Economy marks a milestone: Real estate returns (It’s that damn “socialist” in the White House again! LOL)

*Obama to call for sweeping changes to immigration laws (This sounds like a better approach than what we saw yesterday from the Senate. In particular, I don’t believe we should make people wait decades to be able to earn citizenship.)

*Republicans lost in the wilderness

*A Second G.O.P. (“Would a coastal and Midwestern G.O.P. sit easily with the Southern and Western one? No, but majority parties are usually coalitions of the incompatible. This is really the only chance Republicans have. The question is: Who’s going to build a second G.O.P.?”)

*Boy Scouts close to ending ban on gay members, leaders (Do it!)

*Senate panel shoots down bill that would ease ultrasound rule (Virginia Republicans continue their war on women’s freedom and choice.)

*House passes utility regulation changes, scrapping renewable energy incentives

*Editorial: Bravo, Sen. Smith (“Sen. Ralph Smith showed he has the ability to see beyond the last election.”)

*Va. lawmakers’ gifts last year were padded with travel

*Warned on Medicaid, assembly acts on health exchange

*House panel backs ‘Tebow bill’ (This needs to be killed by the Senate.)

*Va. delegate seeks curbs on use of drones in state

*Analysis: Will Bill Bolling run for governor as an independent?

*Cuccinelli backed failed bill to ease ultrasound rule (Wow, Cuckoo’s trying hard to look “moderate” for the 2013 election. Just remember one thing: he isn’t!)

*Senate approves bills on two-term governor, ex-felon voting rights

*Senate approves bill to ease presidential ballot access

*Bill would define, ban bullying in Virginia schools

*School mental health bills advance in Virginia House

*Dominion/Appalachian Power legislation hurts Virginia in the long run

*Effort to repeal ban on ‘shacking up’ advances in Va. (How can this actually be a law in America in the year 2013?!?)

*Bill advances on fine for smoking with kids in car

*Uranium prospects fading in General Assembly

*Bay Buchanan quits TV punditry, takes online real estate class after Romney’s ‘brutal’ loss (Need a real estate agent in McLean? Call McEnearney Associates and ask for Bay Buchanan! LOL)

*D.C. area forecast: Tumultous temps – big midweek warming, then they crash

VA Senate Republicans Defeat Attempt to Eliminate Mandatory Ultrasounds

1

From NARAL Virginia; Virginia Republicans demonstrate once again that they very much ARE engaged in a war on women’s rights. Just remember that in November.  

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                               JANUARY 28, 2012

BILL TO MAKE FORCED-ULTRASOUND REQUIREMENT OPTIONAL DEFEATED BY SENATE COMMITTEE

SB 1332 ‘passed by indefinitely’ with no testimony or discussion allowed

 

Today, the Virginia Senate Education and Health Committee voted 6 – 3 to pass by indefinitely  SB 1332, Sen. Northam’s bill to make Virginia’s mandatory-ultrasound requirement before abortion optional. SB 1332 was the last of several valiant attempts to repeal Virginia’s intrusive and unnecessary forced-ultrasound law aimed at shaming women, all of which have been defeated by anti-choice lawmakers in the General Assembly. Over 600 NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia activists urged Senators on the committee to vote in support of this and other pro-choice legislation.

Several women’s health and medical experts were also expected to testify in support of the bill but were blocked by Chairman Martin, who prohibited discussion or constituent remarks. In what has become a troubling pattern exemplified by last week’s controversial re-districting bill, Republicans took a vote without all Democratic members of the committee present.

“Today’s vote is an absolute shame,” said Tarina Keene, Executive Director of NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia. “Not only was this a good compromise bill defeated in the name of partisan politics, but what we saw today is perhaps one of the most blatant examples of Virginia politicians ignoring the people they are supposed to represent. We do not elect politicians  to play games with our health or our rights, and we certainly do not elect politicians  to hold  themselves above the accountability of their  constituents.

SB 1332 was a reasonable and rational compromise that, if enacted, would have improved access to healthcare and returned private medical decisions back to patients and doctors. This is not rocket science – medical choices should be left up to women, their families, and their physicians.  It is astounding that six  senators would continue to put political ideology and back-room maneuvering over women’s health, patients’ rights, and the voices of Virginians.”

Allies in the Virginia Pro-Choice Coalition and within the medical community were also blocked in their support of SB 1332. As of 2013, 14 out of 21 states with current ultrasound laws require only that women be given the option to have an ultrasound prior to an abortion. 


Powerful New Video Explains What Republicans Are REALLY Up To with “Voter ID” Laws

4



This video, by Annabel Park’s and Eric Byler’s Story of America project, explains extremely well what Republicans are up to with their “voter ID” and other laws to combat the mythical unicorn of “voter fraud.” Listen as Rev. Dr. William Barber, President of the North Carolina NAACP, explains the history of efforts to prevent African Americans from voting and from achieving any form of political power in the South. One thing enemies of expanded voting are terrified of is “fusion politics” – an alliance of African Americans with Latinos, Asian Americans, and progressive (racially and otherwise) whites. In 1898, for example, the “Wilmington Riots” resulted in white supremacists ousting a duly elected, biracial city government. What happened next? Dr. Barber explains:

The first thing they attacked – there were always five things they attacked – they attacked educational laws, they attacked labor laws, they attacked fair criminal justice laws, they attacked taxes – they wanted to cut taxes so the government wouldn’t have any money to fulfill the promises that had been made to the former slaves – and they attacked voting rights. If your grandfather was a slave, you couldn’t vote; or poll taxes…white supremacy is rewritten into the laws of the state, and by 1910, black voting power is virtually nothing, zero.

Sound familiar? If not, it should, because in many ways it’s the same thing today. That takes us to 2008 and 2012, when Barack Obama put together a campaign “rooted in the idea of fusion politics.” And “guess what, he wins in places like North Carolina, in the south…[with an electorate that’s] broad and it’s deep and it’s young and it’s old and it’s LGBT and it’s black and it’s Hispanic and it’s Asian and it’s people who want to push America beyond the vestiges of racism…But that new electorate scares the whatever out of those who have a homogeneous view of life, it does not fit their world view, so what do you see, an all-out assault once again, this attack on voting rights starts immediately after President Obama is elected.”

But wait, you say, aren’t there numerous cases of people voting fraudulently? Well, no, actually. But listen as Dr. Barber explains how laughably convoluted, implausible, and just completely “ludicrous” mass voter fraud would be. Beyond that, of course, the 15th Amendment is very clear, that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”

What exactly about the 15th amendment don’t these anti-“voter fraud” Republicans understand? In reality, what they’re doing is in blatant violation of the 15th Amendment, as stringent voter ID laws overwhelmingly affect minority and poorer voters, who might not happen to have a driver’s license or other photo ID. So why should Republicans make it harder for these people to vote, given that there’s no “voter fraud,” certainly not of any significance? It’s obvious: they know that blacks, Latinos, and other minorities vote overwhelmingly Democratic, and they want to prevent that from happening. End of story. Any other “reasoning” they give you? It’s just a bunch of bull****. Same thing for any corporate media reporting that presents “both sides” of this “issue.” Utter bull****. So, when these bills come before the Virginia General Assembly in coming days, just remember what this is all about, and let your Delegate or Senator know exactly what you think about this crap (by the despicable Del. Mark Cole) or this crap (by the utterly heinous Sen. Dick Black). Thanks.

P.S. If you’re going to be in North Carolina on February 9, you should check this out.

Swinging for the Fences: The Fable of the Magnet

0

My new project — presently called “Swinging for the Fences,” and introduced here last week with the posting at https://bluevirginia.us/use… — is about equipping us to gain better control of our destiny, as a nation, as a civilization, as a species. It begins with understanding what we’re up against.

History was described by James Joyce as “a nightmare from which we are trying to awaken.”  To us rather privileged Americans — privileged in our material wealth, in our liberty, and in our comparative immunity from the worst of violence and oppression — that sounds like an excessively dark assessment.  But history certainly has its nightmares.  

Why?

The usual answer — or assumption, as usually the question isn’t even articulated — is that “human nature” is so deeply flawed: our kind just naturally creates nightmares.  This answer seems obvious to people who see the whole as only the sum of its parts:  they see people acting on the basis of the choices they make, and they assume that if the consequences are bad it must be because it is in the nature of people to make bad choices.

I am absolutely convinced that this common-sense view of things misses very important dimensions of the reality.  

Our reality consists not only of us individual human beings, but also of the systems that we civilized human beings have created.  (Some of these systems we know about and of some them we are unaware.)  And our destiny is shaped not only by the intentions of human beings making choices but also by the systemic forces that operate on a vast scale and go far to determine both the options available to people and the outcome of the choices they make.

Years ago I came across a fable (I’m trying now to hunt down the source) that depicts iron filings in the process of making what they think to be their own decision about where to go.  Meanwhile, as they are discussing the issue, a magnet is invisibly approaching.  The closer the magnet gets, the more excitedly the filings become convinced that they must travel in the specific direction in which the magnet, unbeknownst to them, is to be found.  

To the filings in the fable, the choice of direction was theirs.  To the observer with the larger perspective, explaining the direction they went is impossible without reference to the magnet.

So also with us humans in history.  

One need not know a whole lot about history to know that frequently the way things unfold is not what most of the people in the situation would have chosen.  

How many of the citizens of mid-nineteenth-century America would have chosen the American Civil War as the means to deal with the long-standing issue of slavery?  

How many Europeans at the time of the Armistice in 1918 would have chosen to be in the situation that beset Europe in 1940?  

How many Americans of fifteen years ago would have chosen for our political system to have been in the condition it has been during the years since?

How many of the people in the hunting-gathering bands of prehistory would have chosen for their descendants to live in the heavily militarized empires of the early civilizations, in which the great majority of the people were virtually enslaved by a relatively few rulers?

In my new project, I will be starting by identifying some of the “magnets” that operate in the human system.  Only to the extent that we understand how systemic forces are operating in our human world, and take appropriate action to bring those forces under control, will we be able to create a future of our choosing.

Next week, I’ll begin to present some of the “magnets” that I’ve been investigating over the course of the past 40 years, as I begin to bring the pieces together to provide a framework of understanding – and a vision – that I believe can help us create a more humane, just, viable, and spiritually well-aligned civilization.

McDonnell’s Legacy Moment: Does He Have Wilder’s Guts?

2

( – promoted by lowkell)

by Paul Goldman

In the modern history of Virginia, only one Democratic governor – Doug Wilder – has been forced to make the gut call on redistricting. In 1971, 1981, 2001 and 2011, Republican governors reigned during the constitutionally mandated redistricting year. These four GOP chief executives – Holton, Dalton, Gilmore and McDonnell – have basically used the redistricting process to increase the number of Republicans elected to the General Assembly. Within limits, such partisan redistricting is not only constitutional, but politically inevitable until the process undergoes fundamental change.  

Wilder, however, did something unprecedented, and still unappreciated today: instead of using the process to unfairly benefit Democrats, he instead did the right thing for the people of Virginia. There are those who say he had no choice given the Voting Rights Act. But as the person advising him on the politics, this is simply not an accurate statement of either the law or the politics. He had choices. But he choose to do the right thing despite incredible pressure from short-sighted Democratic Party leaders and activists.

At the time, I was the Chairman of the Virginia Democratic Party. The Party leaders wanted me to fall in line and advise Wilder to support their plan. But the Governor needed my honest opinion. I had to choose.

Don’t get me wrong:  I got where the Democratic leadership was coming from. At the time, Republicans ran the U.S. Department of Justice. The Voting Rights Act and other laws aimed at ensuring minority voting rights were not popular in Virginia specifically, or the South generally. The level of the opposition is not appreciated from today’s vantage point, a generation later. Moreover the Old Guard had run the Virginia General Assembly for a long time. They had reason to believe the Republican Justice would back their redistricting play so as not to be seen as friendly to the VRA.

It was 200-proof politics, power first, the people second.

It is the game. Now, the GOP Senators, fearing their loss of power in 2015, are making the same play. It is likely to be affirmed by the GOP House in a vote this week…

Unless Gov. McDonnell has former Governor Wilder’s guts. If McD makes it clear he isn’t going to play along, then it is DOA.  

 

Back in 1991, Wilder was under great pressure from powerful Democratic forces to approve their plan, or at least agree to a plan to ensure Democratic control for not only the rest of the decade but probably longer.

THIS LAST POINT – the time dimension – is being missed in the current debate on the Watkins’ led Senate power grab due to the absence of Senator Henry Marsh [who has a seat Wilder told me to create for him].  

If the Watkins led power-grab is signed into law by the Governor and then survives legal challenges, IT IS DESIGNED TO ENSURE REPUBLICAN CONTROL OF THE 2021 REDISTRICTING PROCESS IF NOT UNTIL 2031! A Democratic Governor may, or may not, be able to stop it depending on the politics at the time.

THIS IS THE STAKES RIGHT NOW, not merely the 2015 state senate elections.

Doug Wilder understood the power of redistricting.

As did the Old Guard in the Democratic Party. As do today’s GOP Old Bulls.

To claim Governor Wilder had no choice is not only historically untrue, it is silly in the extreme in terms of real politics. We were in new territory, legally and politically. No one knew for certain.

The same now in 2013. Redistricting in 2013 a redistricting plan approved in 2012 is unprecedented in Virginia. The law is unclear, the Voting Rights Act and other considerations different than in 1991.

The GOP power play in 2013 is just another wrinkle of the Democratic power-play in 1991.

Why? If Wilder did the right thing, Democrats would lose Senate seats big time. Virginia had been growing especially in the GOP suburbs. Given the larger size of the Senate districts, any significant change in boundary lines would put a lot of Democratic Senators at risk under the best of circumstances. Given the deep recession that had hit Virginia’s budget harder than any other state on a percentage basis, the GOP young bloods were on the warpath, Wilder’s popularity down.

The Voting Rights Math added up this way: For every new majority-minority Senate seat created for an African-American Democrat, this figured to defeat at least  two white, often Old Guard, Democratic incumbents or a party replacement trying to hold that seat. If you think we have too much racially based voting now, it was worse in 1991.

The Old Guard redistricting plan passed by the Democratically controlled General Assembly called for two majority-minority Senate seats, which seemed to satisfy the Bush DOJ position on the Voting Rights Act.

Governor Wilder rejected their plan, and created 5. I backed him all the way, the only Democratic leader to do so. Party leaders were convinced the party’s control of the Senate would be lost for the first time ever except for the brief period after the Civil War when elections remained under federal control.

I disagreed: it would be close but we could hold on without rigging the system.

Bottom line: Despite the redistricting, the Democrats retained 57 seats in the House, the high water mark in the last generation, losing only a net of one, a seat we should have actually won admittedly. On the Senate side, we lost 8 seats, but two were due to candidates who thought they couldn’t lose. We held onto a 22-18 Senate majority, also the biggest in the last generation.

The Historic Point: Democratic Governor Doug Wilder did the right thing for Virginia. But it did cost the Democratic Party at lot of seats in the State Senate.

Wilder could have let General Assembly Democrats have their way, they surely offered plenty of quid-pro-quos either directly or by inference. They had been blocking many of his ideas.

But he stood on principle.  

Now comes Republican Bob McDonnell’s turn.

Governor McDonnell and his aides say this is his “legacy” Session of the General Assembly.

If Bob McDonnell wants a legacy, if he wants a defining moment, then what better test of character than to say NO to the GOP Senate redistricting power-grab, aimed giving them unwarranted and unprincipled control of the GA for the next generation.

Yes, he can cut a political deal for his transportation plan and let the courts clean up the mess if they have the guts.

Or McDonnell can do what a Governor is supposed to do: Put the interests of the state ahead of his party.

It is a legacy moment.

It’s all on you Bobby Boy.