Even for House Republicans, who in the face of crisis are always ready to say no to solutions, this is low:

House Republicans abruptly pulled the plug Tuesday night on their promise to take up this week an emergency supplemental disaster aid bill for Northeast states damaged by Hurricane Sandy.

The decision is a stunning reversal since just hours before New Jersey lawmakers were preparing for floor debate Wednesday as outlined under a strategy promoted by no less than Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.). Indeed the Appropriations Committee had gone so far as to file a $27 billion bill Tuesday together with an amendment to be offered by Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.) seeking an additional $33 billion to match the Senate passed package of last week.

Absent a change of heart, the upshot now is that the Senate bill will die with this Congress on Thursday at noon. And the whole affair is sure to bring back memories of the famous Daily News headline in 1975-“Ford to City: Drop Dead.”

To recap: Hurricane Sandy killed at least 105 people in the U.S., including two Virginians, and knocked out power to 8.5 million homes & businesses, including 180,000 here in Virginia. With at least 240 Virginia homes damaged, Gov. Bob McDonnell asked for federal disaster relief. It’s not the first time Rep. Cantor has turned his back on disaster victims, including those in his own district. You may recall Rep. Cantor holding Virginia earthquake disaster aid hostage to Tea Party ideology. Cantor also blocked Japanese tsunami aid, claiming Americans are too poor to help suffering people.

Other, more responsible Republicans from states hit hard by Hurricane Sandy are furious with House Republican leadership:

Rep. Peter King (R-NY) lit into House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and other House Republicans on Wednesday for adjourning the night before without taking up Hurricane Sandy relief legislation.

“It’s absolutely disgraceful,” King said on CNN. “People in my party, they wonder why they’re becoming a minority party. They’re writing off New York, they’re writing off New Jersey. Well, they’ve written me off, and they’re gonna have a hard time getting my vote, I can tell you that.”

King said that Republicans have no problem finding New York when they want to raise money. In light of Tuesday’s inaction, King said, anyone from New York or New Jersey who contributes to the National Republican Congressional Committee should have their “head examined.”

Look, I don’t care if you’re a progressive or a centrist or a conservative. I don’t understand people can go to the polls and cast your ballot for someone like Eric Cantor who refuses to help disaster victims in their hour of need. It’s not a question of partisanship or ideology. It’s a question of human decency.

(UPDATE: Boehner finds a way out? Or, I wonder if this was all just kabuki theater all along…hmmmm. UPDATE #2: House Republicans move toward climactic vote on ‘fiscal cliff’ bill – promoted by lowkell)

Any further evidence needed that Eric “I do not support the ‘cliff’ deal” Can’tor is an ambitious, amoral slimeball gunning for Speaker Boehner’s job, or that House Teapublican’ts are extremists?

The bipartisan agreement struck in the Senate to avoid the worst effects of the “fiscal cliff” ran into strong opposition in the Republican-controlled House on Tuesday, with GOP members criticizing the deal for raising taxes without cutting spending.

Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the influential House majority leader, emerged from a two-hour meeting with GOP colleagues and said he opposes the Senate bill, which would let income taxes rise sharply on the rich. Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) said Cantor “forcefully” expressed his concerns during the closed-door session, during which other GOP members expressed grave doubts about the agreement.

Remember, this bill passed the U.S. Senate by an overwhelming, bipartisan 89-8 margin, and although it wasn’t ideal for either Democrats or Republicans, it was a compromise that almost everyone could live with (e.g., it was the classic “making of sausage”). But not Eric Can’tor and his band of teahadists in the House; for these crazies, only absolutely ideological purity will do. Of course, given that most of these jerks were elected in gerrymandered, solidly “red” districts, and that the only threat to their reelection would be a primary challenge from their right, they have zero political incentive to compromise, and every political incentive not to. Brilliant system we’ve got here, huh? Well, I guess it was nice being the world’s greatest nation for 100 years or so. Thanks, Eric Can’tor et al, for seriously threatening to end that. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

P.S. I strongly agree with this, although I’d add the word “House” in front of “Republicans” to be a bit clearer about it (not that Senate Republicans are great either, but House Republicans are utterly insane): “Republicans aren’t so much brilliant negotiators on behalf the rich as an ideological cult. They won’t take a good deal when they get one, and they won’t buckle for anyone or anything.“

Before progressive Democrats pummel President Obama too much for “caving” on the $250,000 threshold for raising taxes, we all should look carefully at the bill that passed the Senate in the last minutes of 2012. The bill, if it can make it through the House with its tea-poisoned GOP caucus, actually raises taxes on all Americans, but it does hit the wealthy the hardest. Here’s how it works.

Individuals with incomes of $400,000 or more, and couples with incomes of $450,000 or more, will see their top tax rate go from 35% to 39.6%. (Remember that no one’s income is taxed at the highest rate for every dollar. The 39.6% simply affects earnings OVER those amounts.)  Additionally, personal exemptions and itemized deductions will begin to phase out for people making $200,000 or couples making $250,000 or more, giving the president an “out” for his $200,000/$250,000 threshold.

Every working person will pay more under this compromise because the temporary recession stimulus of a 2% cut in FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare) will be allowed to expire. (These are the taxes that Mitt Romney conveniently “forgot” about when he wrongly said 47% of Americans pay no income taxes. FICA taxes are paid on a person’s income and are regressive because everyone pays the same amount, about 7.5% of gross income, regardless of income.)

The estate tax will increase from 35% to 40%, but not on the first $5 million of estate value. That’s hardly surprising, considering that most members of the Senate are multi-millionaires. Most people who get income from capital gains and/or dividends won’t notice the rise in their tax from 15% to 20%, because the higher tax rate doesn’t kick in until annual income goes above that $400,000/$450,000 threshold. (Sorry. Mitt, but you will pay a bit more in taxes unless your accountants can find more ways to hide your income.) Not only that, but the 3.8%  percent surcharge on investment income that was part of the Affordable Care Act means the top rate on investment income would increase to 23.8% for the richest Americans.

I’ve already noticed inaccuracy in reporting on this bill, even from the venerable New York Times. In the Times, Jonathan Weisman says, “The Senate,.. in a pre-dawn vote two hours after the deadline passed… overwhelmingly approved legislation on Tuesday that would allow tax rates to rise only on affluent Americans.” Wrong!  FICA taxes are collected on gross incomes. The tax rate for FICA is going up. Believe me, if I only made $200 a week, the extra $218 I’ll be paying in taxes this year is definitely an increase in my “tax rate.”  

Just as important to President Obama were some other things fixed by this bill, plus the fact that he recognizes that voters want to see politicians compromise. The bill extends federal farm policies through September, avoiding a possible doubling of milk prices. While the bill took away the pay raise for this “do-nothing” Congress, sadly it also ended overdue pay raises for all Federal workers. Extremely important to President Obama was the inclusion of an extension of unemployment insurance for a full year. Without that provision, over 2 million Americans would have lost unemployment benefits.

As I expected, Congress refused to give up its leverage by foregoing another debt ceiling fight at the start of the next Congress. So, the inability to conduct business because of political obstruction will likely go on and on, as will what to do about the automatic, across-the-board budget cuts that this bill simply postpones for another day.

Sen. Tom Harkin, Paul Krugman, and other liberals are extremely disappointed that President Obama didn’t hold out for the $250,000 threshold for income tax increases, believing that Republicans would have been forced by public pressure ultimately to agree to the lower amount. That may or may not be true. However, I personally believe that the president read the politics of this thing correctly. If no compromise had been reached in either branch of Congress, the corporate media would then have blamed both sides equally for the inability to compromise.

In just about every opinion poll taken, Americans want to see compromise in Washington. They want to see problems addressed in a bipartisan way. So do I. I’m sick and tired of posturing politicians playing into the hands of media that want everything to be turned into a conflict, where the media will be able to blame both sides for the gridlock that is caused mainly by a dysfunctional House of Representatives that has been poisoned by Tea Party extremists.

We also have to remember that Barack Obama is not a confrontational person. Let’s be honest with ourselves. No African-American could have attained the highest office of the land if he/she had been an in-your-face, take-no-prisoners, Newt Gingrich clone of a politician.

I would rather have a compromise that doesn’t give me all that I hoped for, rather than make it seem to the business community and the rest of the world that the government can’t get anything done, even when faced with events that could lead to another recession. So, this compromise is O.K. with me. We’ll have to wait and see if the House feels the same way…