Home Blog Page 2529

Video: President Obama Speaks on Hurricane Sandy

0



President Obama and his administration are totally on top of this situation, unlike a certain other administration with a certain other hurricane.  Why is this not surprising?

What Romney’s Desperate, Pathetic Racist Campaign Tells Us

6

Mitt Romney’s campaign is looking increasingly desperate as the final leg of the election approaches, and it is not pretty.

One piece of evidence is, as The New Republic’s Jonathan Cohn has discussed, the fact that Romney has ramped up his level of lying (if such a thing is even possible) defending his position on the auto bailout, while at the same time leveling the utterly false charge that an Obama victory would result in Jeep jobs being sent to China, in a last-ditch effort to win Ohio.

Well, lying is par for the course when it comes to Romney, and at this point the public seems to have become numbed, by constant and repeated exposure, to Romney’s capacity for dishonesty.

But sadly and tragically, a more disturbing sign of Romney’s desperation was his dispatching his campaign’s co-national chairman, John Sununu, this past week to level a pathetic, disgusting, shameful and blatantly racist attack on our President.

(more on the flip)

In case you have been under a rock the past few days, appearing on the Piers Morgan show on CNN, Sununu said that the reason Gen. Colin Powell endorsed President Obama — never mind Gen. Powell’s own detailed and eloquent explanation — was because both of them are African Americans.

Here is what Sununu said:

(At some point, someone in the media ought to take notice of Morgan’s blase acceptance of Sununu’s offensive statement, as if it was perfectly appropriate, but I digress).

Now, whatever else you might think about Gen. Powell and his politics, here are a couple of facts about his service to our country:

  – Numerous medals and decorations for his military service

  – Four-star General

  – National Security Advisor to Reagan 1987-89

  – Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 1989-93

  – Congressional Gold Medal – 1991

  – Presidential Medal of Freedom – 1991, with distinction, 1993

  – Secretary of State 2001-2005

Not too shabby.

But, what Sununu’s attack tells us is that when Romney looks at Colin Powell, he doesn’t see a war hero, or a man of accomplishment who has given most of his life to serving his country. Rather, all he sees is a black man, and nothing else.

Actually, check that. I don’t know what Romney sees, and to be honest, I can’t say for sure that this campaign strategy signifies that Mitt Romney is a racist. I don’t know what is in his heart.

But this strategy actually tells us something considerably more disturbing about Mitt Romney.

It tells us that Mitt Romney thinks many of his voters, and his potential voters, are racists, and thus susceptible to an ugly appeal like this.

Folks, that’s not me calling Romney supporters racist. It is Romney doing so. In fact, I actually think this is a strategy that will ultimately backfire on Romney because, at least here in the Commonwealth, he is reading the electorate completely wrong. Perhaps I am naive, but I believe the majority of Virginians, whether they support President Obama or not, are honest and fair minded people trying to make the best decision they can for themselves.

But can there any longer be any doubt what Mitt Romney and his minions think of us? Sununu’s latest verbal vomit is part of an ongoing, intentional and purposeful campaign appealing to racists that Romney has been waging for several months now.

The dog whistles from earlier in the campaign — the welfare ads, the food stamp allegations, the Obama-doesn’t-understand-Anglo-Saxon-culture allegation, Sununu’s characterization of the President as not intelligent and “lazy,” and Romney’s allegedly off-hand “joke” about the President’s birthplace — did some of the work here. But, definitionally, dog whistle messages are ambiguous and unclear, with alternate explanations, so the perpetrators of the strategy can maintain deniability of their actual intent. Fair enough.

Unfortunately for Romney, his voter support appears to have topped out – even after his so-called debate surge – somewhere south of what he needs to win the election. We can conclude that Romney sees the election this way from the strategies he is following.

With no more scheduled events to turn the tide, he is now desperate for the final votes he thinks he still needs to put him over the top in places like Ohio and Virginia.

With only ten days to go, there is no time for dog whistles – campaigns like that require repetition and time for the more subtle message to filter through the media and sink into the intended recipients. So, out comes the express racial appeal.

But because he is making obvious what once he tried to hide, it is also risky, because it exposes the campaign to blowback. Sununu tried to minimize this with an immediate apology — seriously, did anyone by into that? — but the bigger takeaway is that Romney would only take this risk if he was losing and knew it.

Frankly, the whole thing is disappointing and sickening.

Whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, a Liberal or a Conservative, I ask, do you really want as your president a man who thinks so little of you, so little of America and his fellow Americans, that he pursues a strategy like this?

Frankenstein, Frankenstorm and Climate Change

0

Hurricane Sandy’s proximity to Halloween is no doubt responsible for the nickname Frankenstorm. But, the word wits that came up with that clever name may have been more descriptive than they knew.

In the classic story of Frankenstein, a human creation has gotten out of control. In the case of Frankenstorm, human caused climate change is having the unintended consequence of more frequent, more severe storm events to catastrophic effect.

The “Grand Bargain” Scam: Part II

0

( – promoted by lowkell)

Recently, the Campaign to Fix the Debt, to which Peter G. Peterson is a major donor, sent out an email (with a very revealing picture) to its major supporters. The picture showed a bevy of Wall Street CEOs standing in the NY Stock Exchange, ringing the bell to begin a day’s trading and surrounded by “Fix the Debt” signs. Although the Campaign’s supporters want to appear moderate, seeking to pair spending cuts with new revenue, they are not.

As shown by Americans for Tax Fairness, thirteen of about 80 CEOs and companies that signed a letter pressing Congress to “Fix the Debt” have drained tens of billions of dollars from the federal tax system and thus placed the main burden on other taxpayers. Six companies signing the letter advocate tax amnesty for corporate profits in offshore tax havens.

Six corporations whose CEOs are signatories of the letter to “Fix the Debt” are members of the WIN America Coalition, lobbying Congress to pass Senate bill 161, which would enable companies to reduce their tax rate on trillions of dollars in foreign profits “repatriated” to the U.S. That law would reduce the on-paper 35% corporate tax rate to 8.75% on repatriated dollars.  

According to Citizens for Tax Justice, five corporations whose CEOs signed the letter to “Fix the Debt” paid NO federal income taxes on $62 billion in total profits, but instead garnered $27 billion in tax subsidies over the last for years. (See also “Big No-Tax Corps Keep on Dodging,” Citizens for Tax Justice, 04/09/2012.)

And according to the Institute for Policy Studies, eight of the CEOs signing the letter gained a total of $11.8 million in tax breaks last year from the Bush tax cuts. (Those eight are among 57 CEOs who each gained more than $1 million in such tax favors, collectively receiving more than $100 million in tax breaks.)  

The Office of Management and Budget shows that corporate taxes have decreased from 22.2% of federal revenues in 1961 to a mere 7.9% in 2011. Even though the profits of American corporations have skyrocketed in recent years, their contributions to federal revenues have plunged by 60% in the last 50 years.

The letter to Congress from CEOs and other wealthy “elites” says in essence, as Felix Salmon of Reuters notes: “Please cut our taxes, raise taxes on everybody else, and cut benefits they get from Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, which we [the wealthy] individually don’t rely upon.” In other words, the letter and the Campaign to Fix the Debt constitute nothing more than self-interest masking as public concern.

[This diary is cross-posted by me on BlueNC.]

The “Grand Bargain” Scam: Part I

0

( – promoted by lowkell)

No stranger to promoting austerity for tens of millions of Americans, the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, to which Peterson himself has contributed $458 million, depicts the federal budget as a crisis in desperate need of draconian reactions. But in survey after survey, Americans oppose cutting Medicare and Social Security. Even a recent national tour, titled “America Speaks” and supported largely by Peterson’s foundation, met with audiences that rejected its aims, including its claim that Americans favor raising the retirement age to 69-a claim falsely reported by “America Speaks” to the Bowles-Simpson “deficit commission.”

Peterson, formerly a hedge fund mogul, gives millions to promote austerity in the social safety net, so that millionaires and especially billionaires like him can pay taxes disproportionately low compared to their wealth. He and fellow plutocrats are pushing for a “grand bargain” in the up-coming lame-duck session of Congress in order to slash Medicare and Social Security in exchange for small increases in federal revenues. The latest iteration of the Campaign to Fix the Debt, to which Peterson is a major donor, is chaired by former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell, a corporatist Democrat, and former New Hampshire Republican senator Judd Gregg, another corporatist.

Unfortunately, Peterson and the Campaign’s zeal for other people’s austerity has helped convert many economic “elites,” as well as would-be TV journalists, from fair and responsible budgetary views to sticking the middle-class with the deficit bill by slashing their earned benefits (Social Security and Medicare), ending such middle-class tax breaks as the mortgage deduction, lowering taxes on corporations, and minimizing any tax increase on the wealthy. Proponents of Fix the Debt would re-enforce Bush II’s GOP strategy of minimal taxation, especially on the wealthy, in order to drive up deficits and thereby justify future cuts in Social Security, Medicare, and the social safety net overall.

Funded by Peterson, several corporate CEOs, and other wealthy donors, the Campaign to Fix the Debt seeks to sway media coverage and buy numerous ads to push its austerity-for-others agenda. Perhaps the most public spokespersons of the Campaign are ex-politicians Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson. Infamous for calling the USA a “milk cow with 310 million tits,” Simpson has demanded that current politicians stop emphasizing the pain that would result from cutting the safety net: “Would you quit talking about the poor, the vulnerable, the veterans, the old ladies going over the cliff, the hospices, the bedpans? I mean, what the hell? We all know…that’s the people you want to take care of.”

But how would these people be helped by not talking about them, by ignoring them? More importantly, why did Simpson, as spokesperson for the Campaign to Fix the Debt, use the second person plural “you” rather than the first person plural “we”? Does his pronoun selection imply more shifting of responsibility to others-a shifting analogous to what the nation’s “elites” want to achieve concerning the middle-class and the federal debt, which has surged largely as a result of the tax cuts provided for and the recession caused by many of those very same “elites”?

[This diary is cross-posted by me on BlueNC.]

Douglass Rejects Right-Wing Push for Virginia Uranium Mining

2

From the Douglass for Congress campaign:

Hurt Hides Position On New Study, Refuses to Support a Federal Ban

Chatham, VA – In response to the Heritage Foundation’s call to "Allow Uranium Mining in Virginia," Congressional Challenger General John Douglass issued the following statement:

“I reject the Heritage Foundation study, which attempts to contextualize away the serious concerns of my fellow Virginians about the risk of radioactive waste that threatens our drinking water and air we breathe, because I know from my years in uniform that our safety comes first. So I hope that my opponent has the guts to unequivocally denounce this right wing group’s promotion of dangerous uranium mining in Virginia, give up his contributions from Virginia Uranium Inc. investors and support a federal ban on mining near residential communities once and for all.”

 

 

 

Heritage Foundation releases report, entitled "Time to Allow Uranium Mining in Virginia."

 

 

 

 

 

Heritage Foundation, a “right-wing think tank best known in recent years for advocating Social Security privatization during the Bush administration,” according to Mother Jones magazine. Despite echoing the sentiments of Virginia Uranium Inc. investors that bankroll Congressman Hurt’s campaign, the report reveals some pretty shocking assertions:

•    Mining poses risks to workers and families. "Uranium mining has two specific challenges—those associated with any mining operation and protecting workers and the public from radiation exposure."

•    NRC allows less preferred disposal of radioactive waste. “Tailings… remain radioactive for thousands of years… which produce radon gas… Though the highly preferred option is underground disposal, the NRC allows surface containment ponds under certain circumstances.” 

•    Costs of worst case exceed benefits. “In the very worst case, in widespread contamination and severe environmental impact far exceeding federal regulations along with a reduced price for uranium, would the Coles Hill endeavor be one where costs exceed benefits

•    Those concerned are “antidevelopment”, “fear tactics,” “defeatist.”
 “..anti-development activists to easily exploit the report…fear tactics are still influencing the debate… Defeatist thinking will deny southern Virginia critical economic activities.”

•    VUI-funded study of risks is “negative” and “irrelevant.” “The report was by design, then, a negative analysis that purposely offered no beneficial consequences of uranium mining and was essentially irrelevant to what was specifically being proposed in Virginia.” 

•    Economic benefits are uncertain. “No one is certain yet if mining at Coles Hill is economically viable… no evidence that uranium elsewhere in the state is economical to develop.”

•    Mining won’t solve south-side job loss. “Southside has suffered from the steady retreat of industries, like tobacco farming and furniture manufacturing, which once sustained the region. Uranium mining will not solve these problems.”

•    Foreign countries profit. “VUI is a private company created and run by the Coles family and neighboring Bowen family with investors from Canada…  should have no bearing on the General Assembly’s decision

•    Legislators should review “manipulated” studies. “Many of the studies have been manipulated… Therefore, it is critical that each Virginia policymaker take the time to review each study.”

•    Investors, not legislators, should make mining decisions. "The job of the Assembly should not be to ban [mining]… private investors can determine whether the mining is worth pursuing."

*The full report can be found on the website for the Heritage Foundation.

 

Gen. John Douglass is running for Congress in the 5th District to help Virginia families get a fair chance at a better future after serving our country on President Reagan’s National Security Council and then as President Clinton’s Assistant Secretary of the Navy, before going on to promote air and space policies that grow our economy by creating manufacturing jobs and keeping our skies safe.

Video: Sunday Morning Talk Show Highlights (and Lowlights!)

6

1. Strickland: President Obama Is Bringing Ohio’s Economy Back, Which Is Why He’ll Win The State

2. Axelrod: First priority is people’s safety, not sure how Sandy will affect election

3. Axelrod on President Obama’s closing strategy

4. Bob McDonnell: Virginia on alert for hurricane Sandy

5. Cutter: Romney’s Never Stood Up To “Extreme Right Wing,” Wouldn’t As President

Gen. Wesley Clark Endorses John Douglass for Congress

0

From the John Douglass for Congress campaign:

 

I'm so proud to endorse my friend General John Douglass. We need more veterans in Congress, especially a flag officer like John who has worked with leaders in both parties for the good of our nation.

From our time in uniform, John and I have a unique understanding about how much more we can do to better serve our returning heroes. That is why more than two dozen high level national security leaders are standing with John, like former Defense Secretary Bill Perry, former Navy Secretary Richard Danzig and former Congressman and 3-star Navy Admiral Joe Sestak.

Now John's campaign is facing the deadline for their GOTV budget on Sunday, but they are just $8,552 short. This could be make or break — can you click here and help me, help John by donating today? 

I'm eager to see John Douglass represent Virginia's 5th District, because I know he will do the right things for the right reasons.Please donate now.

Keep up the fight.

– General Wes Clark (USA Ret.) 

Virginia (and Hurricane Sandy) News Headlines: Sunday Morning

5

(UPDATE: WaPo poll has Kaine up 51%-44% on Allen. – promoted by lowkell)

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines for Sunday, October 28. We’ll see how much longer we can keep this blog operational, as I’m assuming a lot of us are going to be losing power tomorrow into Tuesday. Stay safe! (Note: See statement from the White House on the hurricane in the comments section)

*Ann Romney: “Throw out” the American public education system. (This interview is utterly abysmal, not just on education but on a number of topics. My god, what’s wrong with BOTH Romneys?!?)

*Barack Obama for Re-Election (“President Obama has shown a firm commitment to using government to help foster growth. He has formed sensible budget policies that are not dedicated to protecting the powerful, and has worked to save the social safety net to protect the powerless. Mr. Obama has impressive achievements despite the implacable wall of refusal erected by Congressional Republicans so intent on stopping him that they risked pushing the nation into depression, held its credit rating hostage, and hobbled economic recovery.”)

*Hurricane Sandy poised to hammer the East Coast

*Two scenarios for D.C.: Bad and worse (“Even if the Washington area escapes a direct hit from the storm, strong winds and flooding are likely.”)

*Approach of second hurricane in two years revs up preparations

*Andy Schmookler: Bob Goodlatte’s bogus ‘big government’ theme

*Rigell faces Hirschbiel in volatile 2nd District

*Obama clings to a slender lead in Va., Post poll shows

*Poll: Slim majority express negative view of blacks (This is deeply disturbing. It DOES explain how a bigot like George Allen can not be automatically disqualified, as he should be, by 99.9% of Virginians, for his love for nooses, KKK founders, using racial and ethnic slurs, etc.)

*Editorial: Kaine for U.S. Senate (“Kaine’s experience as governor during the recession has given him a wisdom and pragmatism that will serve Virginians well in the U.S. Capitol.”)

*Senate candidates are familiar faces

*Governor advises finish storm prep today

*Romney: Virginia shipbuilding jobs on the line in election (Yeah, HIS party’s reckless, unbalanced policies will endanger them, along with much else…)

*Schapiro: McDonnell running out of time on roads (“It has been 26 years since Virginia made a sustained investment in highways and mass transit.”)

*Newcomer, freshman incumbent fight for rural 9th Congressional District

*Tysons’ last green space on verge of being saved

*Bad medicine from Drs. McDonnell and Cuccinelli

*Virginians stock up on supplies as storm nears

*Worst of Sandy to begin hitting Richmond on Sunday night, experts say

P.S. Check out this video of the Fox News legal team (of all people!) definitively declaring that Patrick Moran did nothing illegal. Surprising; I figured the Faux folks would be talking about whether the death penalty or life in prison without the possibility of parole was more appropriate. Heh.

sandyforecast1028

WaPo Poll of Virginia: Obama 51%-Romney 47% (Likely Voters)

0

And to this excellent news, along with the fact that Romney’s losing Ohio, all I have to say to bad ol’ Willard is: