Home Blog Page 2528

Wayne Powell Releases New “Women’s Health” TV Ad!

0

We just launched a brand-new ad this morning, entitled “Women’s Health.” In it, a woman sitting in an examination room notices a large cardboard cut-out of majority leader Eric Cantor smiling down at her.

“What’s he doing here?” She warily askes her doctor.

“Eric Cantor?” The Doctor replies. “He thinks members of Congress like him should make your family planning decisions.”

Unfortunately, this doesn’t apply to just him. Mr. Cantor is also a-okay with Members of Congress like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock having a say as well.

Now Todd Akin has drifted from the public consciousness somewhat following Richard Mourdock’s jaunt down bonehead lane. But we all know him. He’s the man who made “legitimate rape” a household term. And he’s also the man with which Eric Cantor joined to cos-sponsor or support 32 anti-choice, anti-women, anti-sense bills in the House.

And then there’s Richard Mourdock, the male politician who stood before a crowd of people and proudly asserted that if a woman were to get pregnant as a result of a rape, it was “God’s will.” The same politican who Eric Cantor refuses to denounce.

With company like this, it’s a wonder than Eric Cantor can even claim to support the women of his district with a straight face. After all, unlike Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor hasn’t sought to distance himself from either Akin or Murdock one iota.

Then again, it’s hard to speak up for what’s right when you’ve based your career on silent, cowardly ascension.

Which brings us back to our new ad. Eric Cantor’s voting history, his co-sponsorships and his lack of character when confronted with extremists in his own party paint a very clear portrait of an ideologue who’s antiquated views have no place in the 21st century.

Wayne Powell released this ad because he is the exact opposite of Eric Cantor. He believes that women are smart enough and responsible enough to make their own decisions. He believes that the government has no place in a woman’s personal healthcare deliberations. And he believes that we won’t get anywhere as a nation if we continue to demonize and scapegoat more than half of our population.

Our country is facing a crisis right now. Too many powerful men who call Eric Cantor “leader” are using their influence to punish, to denigrate, and to shame. But with Wayne Powell’s help, we can begin to stem this awful tide.

Tim Kaine Cancels Campaign Events Due to Storm

0
Kaine for Virginia
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 29, 2012 

CONTACT:
Kaine for Virginia Press Office
(804) 359-7106

press@kaineforva.com
 

TIM KAINE CANCELS CAMPAIGN EVENTS DUE TO STORM

Richmond, VA – Today, Kaine for Virginia campaign manager Mike Henry released the following statement:

“Due to the weather conditions created by Hurricane Sandy, Kaine for Virginia has canceled all remaining public events today and all public events slated for Tuesday. Our campaign has sent emails urging Virginians to be prepared and stay safe for the duration of this very powerful storm. The emails provide detailed information regarding how to prepare for the storm, including instructions for putting together an emergency kit and a list of emergency phone numbers to have on hand. 

“As a former governor who's dealt with emergency situations, Governor Kaine is urging everyone to prepare and exercise caution.  He and Anne will be keeping families in the pathway of the storm in their thoughts and prayers over the coming days.”  
 

Video: President Obama “not worried about the impact on the election” but about “families”

4



Obama: “I am not worried…about the impact on the election…I’m worried about the impact on families …first responders…our economy and on transportation…right now our number 1 priority is that we are saving lives; that our search-and-rescue teams are going to be in place; that people are going to get the food, the water, the shelter that they need in case of emergency; and that we respond as quickly as possible to get the economy back on track.”

Romney University 101: What Romney-Ryan means for Virginia families’ health care

0

Two weeks ago, former Congressman Tom Perriello broke down what a Romney-Ryan budget would truly cost Virginia’s family based on a joint report released by ProgressVA and the Center for American Progress Action Fund. Today, ProgressVA is releasing the first of 5 videos that will be posted this week from that session: What Romney-Ryan means for Virginia families’ health care.

The Romney-Ryan budget costs include:

  • Seniors in Virginia would lose health care benefits and pay more. Gov. Romney and Rep. Ryan would force seniors in the state to pay at least $639 more for their prescription drugs each year. At the same time, the Romney-Ryan plan to turn Medicare into a voucher would cost current seniors at least $11,000 more out of pocket.
  • Women in Virginia would pay more for health care but receive less bang for their buck. Gov. Romney and Rep. Ryan would once again allow insurance companies to charge women more than men while taking away preventive care from at least 1,376,205 women in the state.
  • Young adults in Virginia would lose access to their families’ health insurance. Gov. Romney and Rep. Ryan promise to dismantle Obamacare, which would directly result in 66,000 young adults in Virginia losing the insurance they have today due to the Affordable Care Act.

You can read the full report here.

Did Romney Lose by not Picking McDonnell for VP?

0

by Paul Goldman

By now, it is clear the choice of Paul Ryan has not helped Mitt Romney in any significant way in terms of winning 270 electoral votes. True, Wisconsin is considered competitive now, but not because of Ryan being on the ticket (rather, the fallout from the first debate and the GOP’s successful effort to stop the recall of Republican Governor Scott Walker).

As a national figure, Ryan has proven to be a non-entity: the supposed GOP “idea guy” whose ideas Romney dare not discuss if he wants to have any chance of winning!

Right now, Romney seems safe in enough states to have 206 electoral votes in the proverbial bag, President Obama 237 unless there is a significant last-minute shift in voter attitudes in this final week. But assuming this isn’t the case, then the Electoral College hinges on the following states: Colorado (9 electoral votes) Florida (29), Iowa (6), Nevada (6), New Hampshire (4) Ohio (18), Virginia (13) and Wisconsin (10).

To be sure, some of these states are closer than others, and these 8 are not 50-50 right now, they have a lean one way or another. But they are the last 8 seen as truly capable of going either way should one man or the other have the kind of closing surge that is possible without a sea change shift in the electorate or another polling debacle like say 1948 or 1932 due to a failure to anticipate flaws in the pollster’s voter model.  

Mathematically, either guy could lose any one of these 8 states and still win the presidency by carrying the other seven. But as a matter of political logic, this isn’t true: some states, as George Orwell might have said, are more equal than others. For example, if Romney can’t win Florida, there is no reason to expect him to win Virginia – or Ohio for that matter given the demographics.

If you crunch the numbers in terms of political reality, Romney will have to win Florida to have any chance to defeat the president. So let’s give the former governor the Sunshine State. This brings his running EC total to 235. Likewise, if the president loses Nevada it would suggest a serious coalition breakdown from 2008. True, Nevada is facing very rough economic times, but statistically, he should have it. So let’s give the President Nevada’s 6 electoral votes, bringing his EC total to 243.

For the past month or two, Romney has been defying expectations in Colorado, which the President carried easily in 2008. My gut says Romney has a real chance of winning Colorado given the way the polls have been showing for a month. So let’s give Romney the Boulder State, raising the GOP nominee’s total to 244.

Thus here it stands, Romney at 244, Obama at 243, with 5 states to decided the election: Iowa, New Hampshire, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin.

Once again, in theory, either man can lose any one of those states as long as he is winning the other 4.

The most interesting aspect of these remaining states is this: the deciding voters seem to be listening to their own drummer. The Northeast is going solidly for Obama as it has for every Democrat since Clinton with one exception one time: New Hampshire in 2000. It would be a big upset for Romney to win the Granite State. But on the other hand, it only has 4 electoral votes. Thus it doesn’t play a significant role in all but a few of the various possible electoral math equations remaining.

The same for Iowa. This Sunday, the Des Moines Register broke with 40 years of backing Democrats to finally support the GOP candidate for president. The demographics of Iowa suggest that if the logic of their editorial is in tune with the key swing voters in the Corn State, it could presage a Romney victory there by a narrow margin.

Accordingly: Let’s give New Hampshire to the President and Iowa to Romney.

This puts their running Electoral College totals as 250 for Romney and 247 for the President. This would mean the election comes down to three states: Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin.    

To win, Romney or Obama need to carry any two of the three.

Last month, I wrote a piece for Politico. com suggesting that all the bashing of the Romney Team (then the conventional wisdom by the usual suspects) was misplaced, I outlined a strategy taking the usual heat for going against the politically correct crowd. In that regard, I pointed out the scenario where Wisconsin, long overlooked by the experts in DC, became a player in the 270 end game.

Thus the pick of Ryan made sense from that point of view in terms of a generic analysis of someone from a key state who might help at the margins.

But when you get down to a three state election – with the winner having to carry two of those listed above – the political math suggests McDonnell would have been the better choice.

The swing voter this year in Virginia supported McDonnell in 2009 and in 2005: they like him. These voters in Wisconsin have never voted for Ryan. There is little evidence that Ryan is winning any Badger State “pride vote” in terms of having one of their own on the national ticket. But here in Virginia, given the state’s culture, McDonnell would pull 1% extra at least in my view given his standing with key swing voters.

Moreover, the politics of Wisconsin, in terms of local boost to a national candidate, again stems from Wisconsin Governor Walker’s battles, which he has won and in the process galvanized a GOP constituency. Romney is benefiting from that at the margin.

Bottom line: Winning Ohio is up to the presidential candidates, there is no local boy makes good thing going. So either Obama or Romney will have the right stuff, and the edge goes to the President.

This means Romney is likely to need to win both Wisconsin and Virginia to have any chance at the magic 270 (in this scenario 273 to be precise).

Net, net: As I crunch numbers, game theory says Romney would have a better chance of drawing to his inside straight by running with McDonnell over Ryan assuming it came down to one or the other.

Indeed, in terms of political logic, it is difficult to see how Romney wins both Ohio and Wisconsin yet loses Virginia. Virginia seems to be a must-win for Romney.

If that is the case, then not picking McDonnell could prove to be a fatal mistake if the outcome here is as close as the polls suggest given the margin of error in all of them and looking at them on a collective basis.

The failure to pick McDonnell may also have been a very lucky break for Tim Kaine, since surely Allen would have realized that he had to hitch is star to VP candidate McDonnell as opposed to the strange strategy the former Governor and Senator has followed to date.

I wrote in 2010 that the GOP in 2012 would likely have to choose between a McDonnell or a Christie in terms of a VP political approach. Instead they chose Ryan, a strange choice in terms of lining up with the GOP in the House. I still don’t get it on the macro basis, a Governor-Governor ticket makes more sense for me.

Go figure: but good for Democrats in my book.

Long story short: I believe a Romney-McDonnell ticket wins Virginia given how this campaign has unfolded and figuring into the mix the realistic effect, albeit small, of having one of our own on the ticket.

Think about it: Romney announced his pick of Ryan in Virginia! This shows you the relative importance they placed on the Commonwealth.  

In that regard, Team Romney had it right from jump street: Virginia figured to be a must0win for them. Logic therefore says, all things considered even the “transvaginal” mistake, they saddled up the wrong VP horse for the last sprint to the finish line.  

Bill Clinton Urges Support for John Douglass

0

From the John Douglass for Congress campaign. Also see the “flip” for a roundup of a few of the excellent endorsements John Douglass has received. Thanks. 

I can tell you from working with General Douglass that our nation needs him in Congress. As my Assistant Secretary of the Navy, he helped us keep the Navy up to date and strong, turn deficits into surpluses and set up new job training programs. So I know he is ready to roll up his sleeves and get to work for the 5th District.

But we only have one week left to the election. In less than 24 hours, his campaign will make their final resource decisions to help turn his momentum into a win. That's where you come in.

John answered my call to serve all those years. Now I'm asking you to answer his call with a generous contribution before it's too late.

— President Bill Clinton

P.S. I can't wait to see John Douglass in Congress, because of what I first saw in him — a leader who cares too much about our fellow Americans not to take action. Show him your support in the next 24 hours.

 

 

 

**ALERT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 29, 2012**

 

 

 

 

 

ICYMI: President Clinton, Leaders Boost Douglass's Final Push

In case you missed it, President Clinton is just the latest high profile leader to lend their support to General John Douglass for Congress in Virginia’s Fifth District race. Others who have helped the campaign exceed their fundraising goals for the election include Senator Mark Warner, Senator Jim Webb, General Wesley Clark and Rear Admiral Joe Sestak. Here are the highlights from their endorsements:

President Clinton says, “I can tell you from working with General Douglass that our nation needs him in Congress. As my Assistant Secretary of the Navy, he helped us keep the Navy up to date and strong, turn deficits into surpluses and set up new job training programs.”

Senator Mark Warner says, “My friend General John Douglass has a real chance to turn the 5th district from red to blue.”

Senator Jim Webb says, “John's proven leadership will help bring Republicans and Democrats together to break the partisan gridlock that has blocked progress on so many important issues.”

 

General Wes Clark says, “I'm so proud to endorse my friend General John Douglass. We need more veterans in Congress, especially a flag officer like John who has worked with leaders in both parties for the good of our nation.”

Rear Admiral Joe Sestak says, “When Wes Clark, Senator Jim Webb, Secretary Bill Perry and Secretary Richard Danzig all are firmly behind John Douglass. You know he is what we need.”

Senator Creigh Deeds says, “It's a good thing we have my friend John — if anyone can overcome the odds, it's him. His drive to do right by other people has all of us truly inspired to do right by him in these final days.”

Terry McAuliffe says, “I can tell you that John's campaign has everyone talking because they are closing so strong. When I campaigned with him, I can see why — he has voters fired up and he's even bringing voters on the other side into the fold.”

###

For more information or to request an interview, email press@johndouglassforcongress.com, call434-906-2022 and follow us on Twitter @JWDouglass 

 

Gen. John Douglass is running for Congress in the 5th District to help Virginia families get a fair chance at a better future after serving our country on President Reagan’s National Security Council and then as President Clinton’s Assistant Secretary of the Navy, before going on to promote air and space policies that grow our economy by creating manufacturing jobs and keeping our skies safe.

New Romney Ad: “Erroneous”…”Astonishingly Misleading”…”No Good Explanation”… “Despicable”… “Despera

0

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CD7C48.33162030

New Romney Ad: “Erroneous”…”Astonishingly Misleading”…”No Good Explanation”… “Despicable”… “Desperate”… “Lie”

 

 

Detroit Free Press: “Not only was the story wrong, Romney took criticism for not knowing better and repeating it without questioning it.”

 

Toledo Blade: “‘The latest Romney ad, I will grant you, is a clever play on words to avoid saying things that are utterly false,’ Mr. Rattner said, referring to a new Romney ad out today. But he said the implication of the ad is ‘just not true. Chrysler is adding people. It's made major investments in the Toledo Wrangler plant.’”

 

Huffington Post“Where the ad goes from misleading to something more nefarious is in the text it shows. At one point, it displays a line from a Bloomberg story stating that Chrysler “plans to return Jeep output to China,” the implication being that the company is moving operations there as opposed to expanding operations that are already there.”

 

Wall Street Journal“So far, the Romney campaign hasn’t issued a public statement on the flap.”

 

Sam Stein ‏@samsteinhp i asked this morning and am still waiting this evening: anyone have a sound defense of this Romney Jeep ad?

 

Ron Fournier ‏@ron_fournier  Nope “@samsteinhp: i asked this morning and am still waiting this evening: anyone have a sound defense of this Romney Jeep ad?”

 

Ben White ‏@morningmoneyben Wait, not only did Romney camp not back off the erroneous Jeep to China canard, they made an ad out of it? My god

 

Ben White ‏@morningmoneyben @davidshepardson it's astonishingly misleading

 

David Shepardson ‏@davidshepardson  @morningmoneyben I agree many people will assume ad means Jeep sending US jobs to China

 

Joe Vardon ‏@joevardon  Wait, Jeep isn't considering moving manufacturing to China? But Romney said in Ohio … http://bit.ly/ScsbsY

 

McKay Coppins ‏@mckaycoppins  There's really no good explanation or excuse for it. Mitt Romney's Jeep ad is misleading. Full stop.

 

Tim Dickinson ‏@7im“Jeep has no intention of shifting production of its Jeep models out of North America to China” http://on.freep.com/VRbWVD 

 

Michael Cohen ‏@speechboy71 The mendaciousness of Romney's new auto ad is breathtaking even for him: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121028/POLITICS01/210280314 …

 

ThinkProgress ‏@thinkprogress  Is the new Romney ad on the auto bailout the most dishonest one this cycle? http://thkpr.gs/RdUgMh  #probably

 

Travis Waldron ‏@Travis_Waldron  Mitt can't tell the truth about GM/Chrysler, because the truth is simple: At every turn, he was wrong.

 

Sam Stein ‏@samsteinhp  The Romney campaign did defend the Jeep ad to me, by citing the Bloomberg piece that has been called wrong by Jeephttp://huff.to/PAZCWY

 

Blake Hounshell ‏@blakehounshell  OK, @CitizenCohn has persuaded me: this is pretty despicable http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/109256/romney-ohio-chrysler-jeep-china-toledo-obama-gm-rescue# …

 

Andrew Kaczynski ‏@BuzzFeedAndrew  Interestingly, this Romney ad cites the Detroit News, which also debunked the Jeep production moving to China claim. http://youtu.be/kVv6w0EC7Qs

 

Josh Greenman ‏@joshgreenman  Who's acting desperate now? http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/109256/romney-ohio-chrysler-jeep-china-toledo-obama-gm-rescue …

 

Kurt Eichenwald ‏@kurteichenwald  Do GOPers believe Romney when he repeatedly says Chrysler' moving jeep job to china, when company says it's a lie? He'll say anything to win

 

A sampling of headlines the ad has received:

 

Detroit Free Press: Romney's latest ad claims he will do more for the auto industry than Obama
Columbus Dispatch: Jeep/Romney question lingers

Detroit News: UAW denounces Romney comments on Jeep production

Detroit News: New Romney ad: 'Italians' plan to build Jeeps in China

Detroit Free Press: Romney returns topic to auto industry bailout, his weak spot, in crucial swing state Ohio
Detroit Free Press: Romney camp silent on his Jeep-to-China gaffe
Detroit News: Romney picks up incorrect story about Jeep production moving to China
Detroit Free Press: Romney repeats false claim of Jeep outsourcing to China; Chrysler refutes story
Detroit Free Press: Tom Walsh: Romney keeps returning to auto industry, a vulnerable spot
MLive: Romney wrongly claims Chrysler may move all Jeep production to China (video)
NBC 24: Jeep not leaving Toledo for China, Chrysler assures
Toledo Blade: Romney worries about Jeep going to China

Toledo Blade: Romney tweaks Jeep production to China claim

Toledo Blade: Auto czar protests Romney plan for auto industry
WFIN: Unions Protest Romney/Ryan Appearance In Findlay

CBS: Romney cites incorrect auto manufacturing claim in Ohio
The Hill: Chrysler: Romney is wrong, Jeep not leaving US for China
NBC: Politics of auto bailout haunt Romney in Northwest Ohio

Wall Street Journal: Romney Ad Escalates Detroit Rescue Controversy

Huffington Post: Mitt Romney Releases Auto Ad That Misleads On Facts

Think Progress: Romney Auto Bailout Ad Tells Four Myths In 30 Seconds

The New Republic: A Desperate, Deceptive Gambit for Romney in Ohio

Virginia (and Sandy) News Headlines: Monday Morning

6

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Monday, October 29. By the way, Nate Silver’s model now has President Obama back up to a 74.6% chance of winning reelection, while the “Now-Cast” has him a 80.1%, the highest since September 9.

*D.C. area forecast: Sandy ready to power slam the nation’s capital; downed trees, dangerous travel and power outages imminent (“At this point it’s pretty simple. Don’t go out if you don’t need to today. If you have to get somewhere this morning, it won’t be pleasant but you probably can if you’re careful. By around mid-afternoon, it becomes life-threatening”)

*Only one scenario left, and it’s severe

*Mystery math (“Mr. Romney’s tax plan still doesn’t add up.”)

*Kaine maintains lead over Allen in U.S. Senate race in Va., Post poll finds

*Sandy deluges Outer Banks, creeps toward Hampton Roads

*Monday should be Sandy’s worst for Virginia

*McDonnell: Expect storm-related damage, outages in Virginia

*Sandy scrambles campaign schedules in Virginia

*Warner: Storm won’t hurt voting

*Kaine looks to be a ‘bridge builder’ in Senate

*In Middle of Messy Election, Nightmare Makes Landfall

*State will ask voter registrars to extend hours

*Metrorail, buses, federal government offices shut down (“A guide to school, office, transportation and other closures starting Monday.”)

*State agencies closed Monday because of storm

*Arlington seeks voter OK for $80m aquatic center

*Captain Kirk (“R.J. Kirk was wrong to resign from the Board of Visitors without proper notice”)

*Steelers dominate Redskins, 27-12

The Pathological Liar Ends as He Began, A Serial Liar (Who Won’t Stop)

4

It’s a really sad day when what used to be run-of-the-mill resume enhancement (pols bragging or exaggerating about their accomplishments), which was bad enough, has turned into pathological fiction spinning of the worse-than-G-W-Bush Willard Mitt Romney. Believe me, it gets old having to point out even more of Mitt Romney’s lies. Note that hundreds more previously have been chronicled here

Worse than sad. Disgraceful. He casts himself as a religious man, but, where morality and truth-telling intersect, is a complete fraud. Bill Scher has an article listing and refuting the lies in Mitten’s closing argument. Here are a few of Romney’s false claims (asterisked in the blockquote) with Scher’s counterpoint/correction immediately below the lie.

There’s more below the fold…

* He promised to cut the deficit in half, but he doubled it.

If by doubled you mean, long-term deficit cut of $4 trillion, if Republicans will just accept tax increases on people like me.

* He said he would reform Medicare and Social Security and save them from pending insolvency, but he shrunk from proposing any solution at all.

…except for that whole ObamaCare thing, which extends the solvency of the Medicare trust fund, costs savings which I pledged to junk. And except for proposing to raise the Social Security payroll tax cap so the wealthy contribute more to that trust fund’s long-term solvency.

* Where are the 9 million more jobs that President Obama promised his stimulus would have created by now?

…or maybe I should say, where is that 9 million jobs promise? Oh that’s right. Nowhere. It was President-elect Obama who promised a plan to create “2.5 million more jobs by January 2011.” It was President Obama’s stimulus which met that goal, and then some, ahead of schedule.

* They are in China, Mexico, and Canada and in countries that have made themselves more attractive for entrepreneurs and business and investment.

… Thanks to the wave of outsourcing which I pioneered at Bain Capital and tax incentives which I benefit from yet claim not to know exist.

That fact that this race is even somewhat close (the extent of the horse race is most likely greatly exaggerated) is a sad commentary on a number of levels:

a) the success of the “reality” inventors (e.g., Karl Rove and Frank Luntz);

b) the ignorance of some voters, who get their “information” from the ads of Karl Rove with the word-smithing of Frank Luntz;

c) the racism of others (see the new study on 51% of Americans’ racist attitudes), which predisposes the bigots to believe anything negative;

d) the media enablers who refuse to tell Americans the truth instead of he said/he said “coverage”;

e) the pathology of candidates like Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan’s extensive repertoire of fabrications and their shameless propensity to speak them.

We already knew the following about Willard Mitt Romney:  

* Mitt did not save the Olympics, the taxpayers did with a massive bailout.

* He was not a job creator, but rather a debt merchant and leveraged buyout predator.

* His entire professed record in MA is fiction. he wasn’t a governor who worked relentlessly across the aisle, but rather one who used his veto more than 800 times.

*Mitt is not the model citizen he purports, but rather one of our nation’s biggest tax avoiders/evaders.  With millions parked in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Switzerland (and other countries), Mitt himself is a major cause of the federal budget deficit. But he thinks we should throw more money at him.

*Mitt has lied repeatedly about his “plan” for American’s fiscal futures.  

* He has misrepresented the President’s record hundreds of times.

* He has no respect for 99% of Americans and won’t even look out for nearly half of them should he win.

Isn’t a president supposed to be the leader of all of America? Mitt has already declared he won’t consider nearly half at all. And that isn’t even the half of what is wrong with Mitt Romney’s candidacy.  There are hundreds (more than five hundred) more as we have chronicled in previous posts.