Home Blog Page 3198

“You Can Feel it on the Ground”

0

(Cross-posted at gmudemocrats.com)

When:  This Saturday, June 12, 9:00 am to 11:00 pm

Facebook event page


Signup Page

We have another opportunity to help pick up a seat in the General Assembly in a special election.  Democrats in Fairfax County were instrumental in the victories of Senator Dave Marsden and Delegate Eileen Filler-Corn (who won by just 37 votes).  This time, we’re taking a road trip!



Kai Degner is the Mayor of Harrisonburg and a Young Democrat.  He’s running for an open Delegate seat in the 26th District.  The election is Tuesday, June 15.  We have a real opportunity here because:

Kai is a great candidate who really knows the issues in his district

Kai has out-raised his Republican opponent

Democratic volunteers from across the state are fired up!  “You can feel it on the ground,” says Fairfax County Democratic Committee Executive Director Mike Burns.

Kai is running against both a Republican and a Tea Party candidate, so he has a better chance to win a plurality of votes in a three-way race.

Click here if you’d like to reserve a spot on the bus from Fairfax County to Harrisonburg.  Click here if you would like to volunteer in other ways or on days other than Saturday.  The bus leaves from Falls Church on Saturday at 9am.  We hope to see you this Saturday!

Wendell Potter: An Antidote to “Cooch Poisoning”

5



While Virginia’s AG Ken Cuccinelli – our very own reincarnation of John C. Calhoun and nullification – spends his time, and the valuable time of his tax-payer-funded staff, in his personal vendetta against the recently passed health care reform program, the need for health care availability for the “least among us” continues because the bill Cooch hates so much doesn’t even take full effect until 2014.

I sometimes wonder how Virginians think it makes our state look to have to have a medical group that was formed to bring medical care to the poorest parts of the world now with an arm dedicated to providing dental, visual, and medical care to rural parts of the United States – places like southwest Virginia where there are no other alternatives available to many of the people living there.

This year on July 23-25, the Remote Area Medical (RAM) Clinic will again be held in Wise VA at the Virginia/Kentucky Fairgrounds. As usual, the clinic featuring free medical, dental, and vision care will serve thousands of persons who otherwise have no access to doctors or dentists. On October 2-3 the Ram team will visit Grundy at Riverview Elementary School.

Not only does the annual RAM clinic starkly point out the need for that health care reform bill Cuccinelli is trying to overturn, but it also inadvertently led one man who made a very lucrative living as vice president for public relations for CIGNA health insurance company to reverse the course of his life and become an advocate for health care reform. Wendell Potter may well be the most effective antidote we can find to Ken Cuccinelli and the other GOPers who don’t care about those who suffer and die because they are given the “freedom” to go without health care.  

Wendell Potter resigned his CIGNA position in 2008, subsequently joined the Center for Media and Democracy and became a vocal advocate for health insurance reform, including supporting a public option to compete with for-profit health plans. His change of heart began one hot summer day in 2007 when he saw the RAM clinic in Wise in operation.

Potter was visiting relatives in northeast Tennessee back then when he came across an advertisement for the Wise RAM free clinic at the Virginia/Kentucky Fairgrounds. He decided to check it out.

What he saw hit him in his heart. Hundreds of people were waiting in long lines to receive basic medical and dental procedures they desperately needed. Some of the people had driven more than 200 miles and camped out for days in their cars. The clinic’s medical professionals saw patients in sterilized and transformed stalls that normally were used for livestock.

For Potter, that was a defining moment in his life. He saw before him a cross section of the millions of poor, sick people that the industry he worked for didn’t care about. His days of fielding questions and obscuring or justifying  the methods insurance companies use to limit care to the insured were over.

“It was over-powering. It was just more than I could possibly have imagined could be happening in America,” he said in an interview with the Guardian’s Observer.

Potter soon resigned his job and turned his efforts to helping attain universal health care for all Americans. By the way, he is not surprised by the actions designed to repeal the reform bill. (I’m sure that would include the actions of Ken Cuccinelli and like-minded others who are filing suit in the hope that they can overturn reform and return the nation to the rationing of health care by wealth.)

“[The health insurance industry] is a very wealthy industry and they use PR very effectively. They manipulate public opinion and the news media and they have built up these relationships with all these politicians through campaign contributions,” Potter said.

Perhaps that’s be the case with Cuccinelli. According to the Virginia Public Access Project, committees for the election of Cuccinelli received $37,750 from the health industry. He got $13,000 from Anthem, $20,000 from Schering Plough, and $3,500 from the Pharmeceutical Manufacturers of America. Potter’s words ring true.

I know one thing. I am certain that I will be buying Wendell Potters forthcoming book, “Deadly Spin,” which is due out in October.  

Winners and Losers: Virginia 2010 Primary Edition

11

Here are a few “winners” and “losers” from last night. This list is certainly not comprehensive, so feel free to add your own in the comments section!

Winners

Gerry Connolly: He gets to face the same opponent – Keith Fimian – he defeated easily (55%-43%) in 2008. That doesn’t guarantee him victory in this wild and crazy election year, but Team Connolly has got to be happy right about now that they don’t have to face Pat Herrity this fall.

Vincent Harris: The Too Conservative blogger and political consultant took a lot of crap for his (paid) support for Keith Fimian, but in the end Vince laughed last, as Fimian won easily (56%-44%) over Pat Herrity last night for the 11th CD Republican nomination.

Jim Moran: As The Green Miles wrote last night, “Whenever VA08 Republicans are posed with a choice between a candidate voters might actually like and the candidate who most rabidly espouses radical hard right ideology, they choose Teh Crazy every time.” Last night, “Teh Crazy” was purist conservative Patrick Murray, who defeated “progressive” Republican Matthew Berry 52%-48%. The only question now for November is Jim Moran’s margin of victory.

UPDATE: Norm Leahy points out that Eric Cantor was a big “winner” last night. Unfortunately.

Mixed

Scott Rigell and Glenn Nye: In the 2nd CD, wealthy used-car salesman (and former Barack Obama donor) Scott Rigell won the Republican nomination to face Glenn Nye this fall. However, Rigell only received 39.55% of the vote, not particularly impressive. Also, there’s a third-party, conservative candidate in this race, Kenny Golden.  If Golden can pick 5 or 10 percentage points among all those conservatives who didn’t support Rigell last night, it could boost Nye to victory in November.

Chris LaCivita: His candidate this cycle, State Senator Robert Hurt, cruised to the Republican nomination in the 5th CD. On the downside, Hurt received under 50% of the vote and will likely face a conservative, third-party challenger (or two) in addition to Rep. Tom Perriello this fall.

Losers

2nd CD Tea Party: Their endorsed candidate, Ben Loyola, received just 26.6% of the vote last night, losing handily to establishment candidate (and former Barack Obama donor and “Cash for Clunkers” recipient) Scott Rigell. Then, as Bearing Drift reports, the fun really began, as the Hampton Roads Tea Party Chair called the bottom three candidates – Scott Taylor, Ed Maulbeck and Jessica Sandlin – “selfish” for not dropping out and throwing their support to Loyola. Way to unify the party heading into the General Election!

5th CD Tea Party: Couldn’t coalesce around a single candidate to challenge Robert Hurt, but instead had 6 – count’em! – candidates to splinter the vote among themselves.  The predictable end result, as most of us have been predicting for months now, was Hurt winning easily over the crowded Tea Party field. Is this disorganization and lack of discipline the Achilles Heel of the Tea Party movement, just as with many other movements?

“Joe” the “Plumber”: The candidate he endorsed, Laurence Verga, received a grand total of 802 votes (2.27% of the total) in the 5th CD Republican primary. It appears the “plumber” just got flushed (or clogged, I can’t decide on the metaphor here).

Krystal Ball: Her only real hope of winning this November was to have Catherine “Bullet Box” Crabill as the Republican nominee or at least as a third-party protest candidate. At the minimum, a poor showing last night by Rep. Rob Wittman would have been encouraging news for Ball. Instead, we saw Wittman annihilate Crabill and cruise to an impressive victory.  Bummer for Ball.

The Most Important News of the Night

4



Forget politics for  a minute. In the most important news of the night, Stephen Strasburg struck out 14 batters – a new Nationals record – and got his first Major League win.  Of many, I predict!

Polls Are Closed, Results Open Thread

20

Please use this as an open thread to discuss the primary results – Virginia and national, if you wish – as they come in tonight.  Personally, I’m crossing my fingers for Bill Halter over Blanche Lincoln, plus the craziest, most far-right-wing, and hopefully least electable Republicans in every one of their contests. For instance, go Sharron Angle in Nevada!

UPDATE 7:33 pm: Rob Wittman is annihilating Catherine Crabill, 89%-11%, with 47% of precincts reporting in.  Wittman is the winner.

In the 11th CD, Keith Fimian is out to a 65%-35% lead over Pat Herrity, but with only 9.5% of precincts reporting.

In the 8th CD, with 35% of precincts reporting, it’s Matthew Berry with a slight lead (52%-48%) over Patrick Murray.

In the 5th CD, with 33% of precincts reporting, Robert Hurt leads at 40% of the vote, followed by Jim McKelvey at 31%, Mike McPadden at 11%, Ken Boyd at 10%, Feda Morton at 5%.

UPDATE 7:37 pm: In the 2nd CD, with 26% of precincts reporting, it’s Scott Rigell at 40%, Bert Mizusawa at 29%, Ben Loyola at 19%.  Looking pretty good for Rigell so far.

UPDATE 7:43 pm: With 53% of precincts reporting in the 5th CD, Robert Hurt is pulling away (46%) over Jim McKelvey (28%) and everyone else under 10%.  I think it’s fair to say that Hurt will win this one. If only the tea partiers could have united around 1 candidate; united they stand, divided they fall?

UPDATE 7:48 pm: Wow, Pat Herrity is getting walloped by Keith Fimian with 25% of precincts reporting — 62% Fimian, 38% Herrity.  It looks like NLS nailed the call of Fimian over Herrity. Also, turnout appears on track to surpass Leslie Byrne’s key number of 30,000. We’ll see.

UPDATE 7:52 pm: Scott Rigell is extending his lead in the 2nd CD with 37% of precincts reporting. Currently Rigell 41%, Loyola 23%, Mizusawa 21%. This one appears to be pretty much in the bag for Rigell.

UPDATE 7:55 pm: Marc Ambinder tweets, “More evidence the Tea Party can’t organize its way out of a bag, politically: easy win for establishment candidate in VA 05….”

UPDATE 7:56 pm: With 40% of precincts reporting in the 11th, Fimian is winning easily over Herrity, 62%-38%. Big win for Vincent Harris of Too Conservative; he was Fimian’s netroots guy on this one.  

UPDATE 8:04 pm: With Hurt’s win in the 5th CD, the question is whether – and how many – independent candidates, “tea party” or otherwise, there will be.  Seems like Hurt winning makes it more likely, but we’ll have to see.

UPDATE 8:07 pm: With 58% of precincts, it’s now Fimian 61%-Herrity 39%. What happened to Pat Herrity?!? He’s certainly no Jack Herrity!

UPDATE 8:15 pm: In the 8th CD, with 74% of precincts reporting, Patrick Murray leads Matthew Berry by just 16 votes.  Most exciting race of the night so far!

UPDATE 8:21 pm: Keith Fimian tweets, “WTOP has called me the winner of the election! Link coming soon.”

UPDATE 8:24 pm: “Joe” the “Plumber”‘s pick in the 5th CD, Laurence Verga, ends up with just over 2% of the vote. Now that’s some plumbing power! Heh.

UPDATE 8:31 pm: With 90% of the vote counted in the 8th CD, Patrick Murray now leads by 307 votes. He’s probably got it.

UPDATE 8:53 pm: Turnout in the 11th CD is over Leslie Byrne’s magic number of 30,000, meaning that Keith Fimian has a shot this November. Not a good one, mind you, but a shot nonetheless!  Also, it looks like Patrick Murray will be the Republican sacrificial lamb nominee against Jim Moran.

VA Enviros, Veterans Urge Webb and Warner To Vote “No” On Murkowski’s Dirty Air Amendment

3



Earlier today, Virginia environmentalists, veterans, and other activists held a press conference in Richmond, at which they urged Senators Mark Warner and Jim Webb to oppose a wildly misguided piece of legislation by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK, BP, ExxonMobil), what many of us are calling the “Dirty Air Amendment” (or, alternately, the “Big Oil Bailout” bill).  For more, see the press release from Environment Virginia after the “flip.”

SENS. WARNER & WEBB URGED TO VOTE “NO” ON SEN. MURKOWSKI’S BIG OIL BAILOUT

New Analysis Shows Murkowski’s Proposal Would Increase Virginia’s Oil Dependence, Cost Virginians Millions

RICHMOND, Va. (June 8, 2010) – As oil continues to pour into the Gulf of Mexico, in what is now one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history, Virginia environmentalists, veterans, and other activists held a press conference today to urge Senators Mark Warner and Jim Webb to oppose new legislation that would actually help oil companies and other dirty energy producers to operate with fewer restrictions than they have now.   This misguided resolution, sponsored by Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), is a bailout for Big Oil and other dirty energy providers at the public’s expense that will gut the Clean Air Act, threaten our health and security, and continue to put us at risk of major disasters like what is happening right now in the Gulf.  The event comes just days before the Senate plans to vote on the measure this Thursday, June 10.

“This bill is yet another corporate bailout, but this time for Big Oil and other polluters,” Environment Virginia Advocate JR Tolbert said.  “With the oil disaster in the Gulf wreaking havoc on people’s livelihoods and the environment, we need to end America’s dependence on oil, not make the problem worse.”

Murkowski’s Big Oil Bailout would increase Virginia’s oil dependence and give Big Oil millions that belong in Virginians’ pocketbooks.  According to a new analysis conducted by Environment Virginia that examined the proposal, it would increase the Commonwealth’s dependence on oil by more than 13 million gallons in 2016 and cost Virginians $34 million at the gas pump in 2016.  But the negative influence of this Big Oil Bailout would be even greater over time.

Virginians have drawn a line in the sand asking whose side Senators Warner and Webb are on: Senator Murkowski and her Big Oil allies or the American people?  

Senator Murkowski is the #3 recipient in Congress of money from Big Oil and the #2 recipient of money from electric utilities so far this election cycle.  Two Washington lobbyists that work for oil-industry lobby groups wrote her resolution.  

Virginia residents want comprehensive action on our energy future, not handouts to Big Oil and other dirty energy polluters.  New poll results released today by We Can Lead, a project of Ceres and the Clean Economy Network, show that a majority of voters in the state support the comprehensive clean energy and climate proposal unveiled by Senators John Kerry and Joe Lieberman in May, 58-37%.  The poll also found that 81% of Virginia voters want the country to reduce its dependence on foreign oil.

Virginia participants in the event called on Senators Warner and Webb to side with national security organizations and veterans, the UAW, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, former Republican EPA Administrator Russell Train, American Academy of Pediatrics, thousands of scientists, environmental organizations and governors, attorneys general, and top environmental officials of numerous states in opposing this handout and acting on comprehensive solutions that will put the U.S. back in control of its energy future.

“Dealing with the symptoms of an oil spill through a temporary band-aid approach and a handout to oil companies is not what the American people want or deserve,” Tolbert said.   “Senators Warner and Webb should help defeat this proposal and act swiftly to support comprehensive legislation that will lessen the extensive damage caused in the Gulf, cut our oil dependence, and move to a clean energy economy.”

Yes, President Obama, Please Kick BP’s Ass!

4

Fascinating interview, Barack Obama calm, cool, collected, and in control as always, but also at times sounding a bit un”Vulcan”-like. On second thought. Mr. Spock seriously “kicked ass” when he needed to, and it didn’t seem to hurt him any! 🙂 So, I say, “Go Obama, kick Tony Hayward’s, BP’s, and Big Oil’s sorry butts!” Oh, and while you’re at it, please turn this crisis into an opportunity – for comprehensive, clean energy and climate legislation that breaks our foreign oil addiction and tells corporate polluters like BP where to shove their dirty money.

P.S. Oh yeah, and please remind people, President Obama, that we’re in the mess we’re in thanks overwhelmingly to the big oil companies and the Republican politicians (Bush, Cheney, DeLay, Boehner, Cantor, etc.) who love them (and take huge wads o’cash from the same).

Who is the Worst Offender: The Climate Denier or The Complacent Staller?

(I’m happy to report that, starting next Monday, I’ll be joining these guys (NRDC Action Fund, that is, not the climate skeptics – lol). Looking forward to kicking some…of what Obama talked about kicking today! 🙂 – promoted by lowkell)

This is a pivotal week in the clean energy debate. The Senate will vote on Murkowski's short-sighted resolution to take away the EPA's authority to regulate pollution. As we head into this critical time, it's not the Inhofe-cloned climate deniers who trouble me – it's the knowing bystanders who are keeping me up at night.

Before I start this rant, let me just state for the record that I still think deniers are about as accurate as my three year old is when she is trying to describe quantum physics at her make-believe tea parties (although they are wholly less adorable). The vast majority of these deniers resist climate legislation because they really don't believe global warming is a problem – yes their heads are in the sand. But for the purposes of the Murkowski resolution, their vote is already lost.

Lately I am even more frustrated with Senators who recognize that climate change is an urgent challenge, but who sit idly by on the sidelines doing nothing. For me, they raise the fundamental question – Who is worse – those that deny the existence of climate change or those that believe in the upcoming catastrophe and continue to lack focus or alarm?

Take Senator Schumer for example. He has stated that he thinks the Senate should confront the impacts of climate change. Yet just this week, when leaders should be pushing hard for climate action, Schumer's support has been tepid at best. On Morning Joe, heshowered Senator Bingaman's energy-only bill with praise, then said, “What do you do about climate change? Kerry has a proposal that has pretty broad support…He is going to get a chance to offer that opinion, and we will see if it has the votes.”

We are looking for more from our Leaders than a passive wait and see attitude. Senator Schumer is the third ranking Democrat, and that means he needs to do more than wait around to cast a vote. It's time for real leadership, which means rolling up his sleeves and making sure a bill passes. We need him in the trenches. In fairness, the Senator walked himself back a bit after people threw a fit over his Morning Joe ambivalence. He has pledged to meet with Senator Kerry on a path forward but until he demands action and puts him ample political muscle behind that call, I am skeptical.

Exhibit #2 is Senator Rockefeller. As a Senator from West Virginia, hewants the federal government to do a better job of regulating mine safety, especially after the horrifying disaster at the Massey coalmine. I applaud him for that stance, but here is where I get confused. When it comes to global warming–something Rockefeller says, “America must address”–he suddenly gets allergic to federal regulation. He wants the Senate to block the EPA from reducing global warming pollution until Congress gets it's act together. The federal government can and should be involved – today. Just as federal regulation needs to be strengthened to deal with mine safety, we need to let the regulators use the tools on the books begin addressing greenhouse gases.

And finally, the fence sitters continue to be the best example of willful negligence. The Senate is going to consider a resolution this week from Senator Murkowski to put the breaks on EPA's efforts to address greenhouse gases. There is a small group of Senators – like Collins, Snowe, Pryor, Webb, and Scott Brown – who say they want to reduce global warming pollution but may vote for Murkowski's resolution to overturn the EPA's authority to do so. If you think carbon emissions are dangerous, wouldn't you want to use every weapon at your disposal to fight it?

When I see Senators backpedalling, downplaying and side stepping climate action, I want to ask them: what are you waiting for? When is there going to be a better time to transition to clean energy? America is watching the cost of failed energy policies literally washing up on our shores. Our nation is desperately in need of the jobs and economic growth that a clean energy economy can provide. Congress has the most pro-clean energy members we are likely to get for several years.

I think I just answered my own question – which is worse, a climate-denier or a knowledgeable staller…. I vote that someone who fails to act when they know the stakes is much worse.

Fortunately, Bill DeSteph Doesn’t Speak For Anyone But Himself

0

I couldn’t agree more with Vivian on this one.

Virginia Beach Councilman Bill DeSteph sent a letter to the mayor and council members of New York, protesting the location of a proposed community center. The letter was wrong on so many levels, including the fact that he used official city letterhead and failed to discuss it with fellow council members.

But that wasn’t the part that got me. After all, I don’t live in Virginia Beach. No, what got me was that he made it sound as if he were not only representing Virginia Beach but all of Virginia.

[…]

Um, Bill – I don’t recall anyone casting a vote for you to represent the Commonwealth. Your name wasn’t on the ballot last November. Don’t we have at least three spokesmen for the Commonwealth whose names were on that ballot? Did you consult any of them before penning this missive?

Other than falsely speaking for all of us, DeSteph also gets the basic facts of this situation all wrong, as Vivian correctly points out.  For instance, DeSteph charges in this ignorant tirade/rant that “Muslems build mosques to represent Islamic supremacy over their enemy.”

First of all, it’s spelled “Muslims” not “Muslems.” Moron. Second, Muslims build mosques for the same reason that Jews build synagogues and Christians build churches – to pray in! Third, if DeSteph really wants to criticize Muslims for building their houses of worship over churches and synagogues — which he certainly does in his ignorant tirade/rant — he really might want to check out Spain, where untold numbers of former mosques are now churches. He might also want to check out Cusco, Peru, where churches are built over Incan sanctuaries and even one of its most sacred temples, the Coricancha. The fact is, every religion and every culture does this – Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, you name it. Fourth, as Vivian points out, “it’s not at Ground Zero, but on property two blocks north that the group already owns.” So much for conservatives respecting private property, at least in Bill DeSteph’s world. Fortunately, DeSteph doesn’t speak for anyone but himself, even if he thinks he does.