Home Blog Page 3202

Do you want to lose a lot of sleep tonight???

1

If you would like to lie awake wondering why we didn’t do something back then, I recommend you read Jimmy Carter’s speech on US energy dependence delivered in 1977 — that’s 1977, as in 33 years ago.

Here’s a link to the full text of the speech

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/c…

and here’s an excerpt.  Read the whole thing for full impact.

Tonight I want to have an unpleasant talk with you about a problem unprecedented in our history. With the exception of preventing war, this is the greatest challenge our country will face during our lifetimes. The energy crisis has not yet overwhelmed us, but it will if we do not act quickly.

It is a problem we will not solve in the next few years, and it is likely to get progressively worse through the rest of this century.

We must not be selfish or timid if we hope to have a decent world for our children and grandchildren.

We simply must balance our demand for energy with our rapidly shrinking resources. By acting now, we can control our future instead of letting the future control us.

Two days from now, I will present my energy proposals to the Congress. Its members will be my partners and they have already given me a great deal of valuable advice. Many of these proposals will be unpopular. Some will cause you to put up with inconveniences and to make sacrifices.

The most important thing about these proposals is that the alternative may be a national catastrophe. Further delay can affect our strength and our power as a nation.

Our decision about energy will test the character of the American people and the ability of the President and the Congress to govern. This difficult effort will be the “moral equivalent of war” — except that we will be uniting our efforts to build and not destroy.

I know that some of you may doubt that we face real energy shortages. The 1973 gasoline lines are gone, and our homes are warm again. But our energy problem is worse tonight than it was in 1973 or a few weeks ago in the dead of winter. It is worse because more waste has occurred, and more time has passed by without our planning for the future. And it will get worse every day until we act.

The oil and natural gas we rely on for 75 percent of our energy are running out. In spite of increased effort, domestic production has been dropping steadily at about six percent a year. Imports have doubled in the last five years. Our nation’s independence of economic and political action is becoming increasingly constrained. Unless profound changes are made to lower oil consumption, we now believe that early in the 1980s the world will be demanding more oil that it can produce.

. . .

Yep, should have listened to Ol’ Jimmy.  Instead, we turned to Uncle Ronnie and his “Morning in America” schtick.

To whom will we listen now??

Sorry, didn’t mean to scare everyone.

Wherein I attempt to coin a political term of art

3

( – promoted by lowkell)

American political discourse is littered with various “-ers” nicknames for political movements.  The first that I can remember were the 9/11 “Truthers.”  Then came the “Birthers,” the “Tenthers,” and the “three-percenters.”  I would argue friends that another political movement ending in “-ers” has emerged: the “Bathers,” short for “Bloodbathers.”

Who are the Bloodbathers?

The Bathers, as I am now going to call them, are political pundits who refuse to write or talk about anything else but their belief that the Democratic Party is headed for a bloodbath in this November’s mid-term elections, in spite of the very considerable evidence that the Republican Party is poised to fumble this year’s elections, possibly very badly.

Now don’t get me wrong–the incumbent party frequently loses at least a few seats during mid-term elections, so starting your election narrative by noting this fact is simply common sense.  But having stated the obvious, the default, a good journalist will then test their hypothesis against observable facts.

Yes, the incumbent party typically loses seats in the mid-term election, but . . .

. . . is the opposition party’s fundraising suffering due to widespread corruption and wasteful spending by party leadership?

. . . is the opposition party riven by a civil war between its establishment and its fringe elements?

. . . is the opposition still widely identified with a former president that is widely seen as responsible for many of the country’s problems?

. . . has the opposition party put forward a viable alternative agenda that it wishes to pursue, or has it simply functioned as a spoiler, opposing everything?

. . . is the opposition party widely seen as being closely tied to the industry responsible for causing the greatest environmental disaster in American history?  Is the opposition party responsible for the lack of regulation that contributed to the disaster?

. . . is the economy, by far the most important issue in this year’s election, turning around in favor of the incumbent party?

This is just a sampling.  There are many more good questions that need to be asked, more issues to be addressed.  Maybe you can help me think of a few more in the comment section.

In 1948 nearly the entire political press corps decided that Dewey was going to crush Harry Truman in the presidential election.  The nation’s political reporters decided the outcome of the election very early in the process and would not be swayed from their prejudged conclusion: Dewey would defeat Truman.

On the night of the election, November 3, 1948, many political reporters didn’t even bother to wait and listen to the election returns: they filed their stories for the day and went home early.  

At the arch-conservative newspaper The Chicago Tribune (the Fox News of its day) the editors decided not to wait for the final results.  They composed a now infamous headline for the first edition of the next day’s paper.  The headline proclaimed: “DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN” and the front page article described how the Republican Party had gained control of the House and the Senate.  House and Senate Republicans were talking about how they were ready to cooperate with President-Elect Dewey to begin enacting the Republican agenda.

Except it was all wrong.  Truman had defeated Dewey, and the Democratic Party had reclaimed control of both the House and the Senate.  Nearly every political reporter in the United States had been wrong.

Now, I understand that we live in a time when the art of political polling is far more advanced than it was in 1948–yes, that is true.  But it is also true that we live in a time when Fox News is given far more credence than it deserves and at least one major polling company (Rasmussen) routinely slants its polls to try and affect the narrative and the outcome of the issue or election it polls about.

So, for a political reporter in this day and age to mindlessly repeat the “bloodbath” meme over and over without ever bothering to ask whether the underlying facts actually support their pre-conceived notions is journalistic malpractice that can only be explained in one of three ways: 1) bias; 2) laziness; or 3) incompetence.

The fact is that the Republican Party isn’t even close to inflicting a “bloodbath” on the Democratic Party this year: the facts simply do not support that conclusion.  That could change.  The Democrats could easily blow this election by lying down, becoming passive, refusing to press a reform agenda, and generally acting like Republican-lite.  But the way things look, it could just as easily be the Republican Party that implodes due to scandal, intra-party fighting, and the complete lack of a positive agenda to run on.

A political reporter that allows himself (or herself) to become a “Bather” could really end up looking foolish this November.

Thanks for reading this diary.  Can you think of any other questions political reporters should be asking right now?

Can you think of any “Bathers” that have already written off the Democratic Party?  Which category of journalistic malpractice do you think they fit into?

“George Allen attacks Romney/Heritage health plan, then gets confused”

4



Ah…the mind of George Allen, truly a wondrous thing!

Bob McDonnell: Virginia’s Bungling “CEO”

4

Sometimes, I think that Bob McDonnell is trying to create some sort of dubious record for screw ups that will last far beyond my – or his – lifetime. His latest is his refusal to comment on the most recent outrage of teammate Ken Cuccinelli, who’s refusing to join 48 other state attorneys general in filing amicus briefs supporting Albert Snyder, the father of a Marine killed in Iraq, who is suing Westboro Baptist “Church” in Kansas for disrupting his son’s 2006 funeral in Maryland with anti-gay and anti-American screaming demonstrations.

It boggles my mind that McDonnell has found a way to botch so many things in such a short time. After all, he’s been in office only four months and 2 weeks, but he’s wasted no time in creating controversy and making Virginia look foolish, all the while appearing inept and indecisive.

It all started just days into his administration when the new governor refused to include sexual orientation in his non-discrimination order. Not only did McDonnell say that protecting the employment rights of gay Virginians was not the job of the governor, but he also reversed a final order by former Gov. Tim Kaine that would have allowed unmarried partners of state employees, including same-sex partners, the right to buy into state health plans.

After a national uproar about that action, McDonnell did his first side-step, vainly hoping to undo the mess. He issued an executive directive that stated that he would not tolerate any discrimination in state employment. (Of course, at about the same time he also refused to take a position on attorney general Ken Cuccinelli’s letter to state colleges and universities telling them that they had no legal authority to add sexual preference as a category in their non-discrimination policies.)

I never could understand McDonnell’s rationale. He said he was opposed to any discrimination in employment but only the legislature could ban discrimination based on sexual preference. If that were true, he simply could have encouraged the Republicans in control of the House of Delegates to pass legislation remedying that. He did no such thing, showing his true colors. As we were soon to find out, that was just the first of McDonnell’s actions guaranteed to damage the image of the Commonwealth.

Debacle of Confederate History Month

McDonnell decided to follow the example of former Gov. George “Macaca” Allen in reviving the proclamation of April as “Confederate History Month.” The two Democratic governors after Allen, Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, passed up that one. Plus, unlike the proclamation of the state’s last Republican governor before McDonnell, Jim Gilmore, McDonnell made no mention of slavery in his proclamation. Instead, he just asked that the month be used to “understand the sacrifices of the Confederate leaders, soldiers and citizens during the period of the Civil War.” (Let me translate: “Understand the sacrifices of only white Virginians during the Civil War.”)

After yet another national uproar, McDonnell backtracked again and amended his proclamation to say the slavery was a disgraceful chapter in American history. Furthermore, he had to apologize personally to several prominent black Virginians who had actually bought into his claim of being a “moderate conservative.”

Oil Drilling Conundrum

As the BP oil spill continues its second month of spewing massive amounts of oil into the waters of the Gulf of Mexico and threatening wildlife and the livelihoods of thousands of Gulf residents, McDonnell has yet again taken a weird position, trying to straddle his previous love for offshore oil drilling and the reality of the unfolding crisis.

McDonnell told the Richmond Times-Dispatch that while he understands President Obama’s decision to cancel pending deep water lease sales for at least six months, pending the outcome of a study of the crisis, he rejects that decision and opposes it. Huh?

“I do not believe outright cancellation was the only alternative given the fact that this sale was not due to occur until two years from now, and actual drilling would likely take place years after that,” McDonnell stated, finally admitting what critics of his phony “transportation plan” said back during his campaign against Creigh Deeds. No money could be realized from offshore drilling for many years.

(If the possible scenario that KathyinBlacksburg’s recent post poses does come to pass and oil flows up the Atlantic coast, McDonnell will have a really big problem explaining his position to the angry residents of coastal Virginia! Maybe he can invite Sarah Palin to come down and help him explain it.)

Refusal To Take a Stand on Ken Cuccinelli’s Actions

Instead of reining in the extreme, right-wing craziness of his ticket mate Ken Cuccinelli, McDonnell periodically hides behind some bland statement about how the latest insane action Cooch takes is somehow the sole responsibility of the attorney general. In addition to the attorney general refusing to join those 48 other state legal officials in the suit against Westboro Baptist’s bigoted, hate-filled demonstrations, McDonnell has also backhandedly justified Cuccinelli’s lawsuits against the EPA and the recently passed federal health reform program, as well as his demand that UVa ignore academic freedom and turn over all information about work done there by climatologist Dr. Michael Mann.

Professed Ignorance of Fred Malek’s Background

When asked about the background of Fred Malek, recently named by McDonnell to head a commission that will recommend ways to cut state government, McDonnell said that he “did not know about this background.”

So, we are supposed to believe that McDonnell did not know that Malek was Richard Nixon’s “hatchet man,” once making a list of Jews at the Bureau of Labor Statistics who would be purged. Also, McDonnell professed ignorance about a $100,000 fine the SEC levied against Malek for actions in 1998 by his private equity firm. I guess Malek’s gigantic campaign contributions to Republicans over the years blinded McDonnell to the man’s faults.  

I can’t even figure out what’s worse, naming someone with Malek’s personal history to head a high-profile commission or saying outright that his administration doesn’t bother to do background checks for people in his administration. I certainly agree with the comments of State Sen. Donald McEachin (D-Henrico).

“To ever tolerate corruption and illegal activity is totally unacceptable. For Governor McDonnell to…say he was unaware of these details, and ignorant of a six-figure fine, is absolutely stunning and, frankly, beyond belief,” McEachin told the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

There have been so many of these missteps that I’ve probably missed a couple, but I know there will be another in a week or two…

Catherine “Bullet Box” Crabill’s Closing Message

7



I agree with Sean Holihan, “This. Is. Perfection.” Go Crabill! Ha.

P.S. If you missed the “bullet box” speech and need some entertainment on a sweltering Thursday afternoon, click here.

First, Malek, McCain and McDonnell. Now, Rove and Cooch.

1

If you don’t have dinner plans next week, here are a couple of great ideas for you.

First, you can enjoy a lovely soiree with Bob McDonnell, John McCain and Fred Malek. Maybe they’ll talk about this or this while they’re dining on…this, perhaps?  And all for just $2,400 (or more, if you so desire).  Sounds like a fun time — or, on second thought, not!

Second, if that’s not enough right-wing fun for you, there’s always this event, which looks like a barrel of laffs!

Karl Rove, the man once known as George W. Bush’s brain, is coming to Virginia for a fundraiser for the state Republican party.

Party officials expect as many as 300 people to donate up to $60,000. The June 15 event will be in McLean, but the party isn’t releasing the location of the house just yet. Could the party be worried about protesters?

Rove, who just released a new book Courage and Consequence: My Life as a Conservative in the Fight, will be joined by Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and party Chairman Pat Mullins.

In case you attend, here are a few talking points about Rove.

*”In the fall of 1970, Rove used a false identity to enter the campaign office of Democrat Alan J. Dixon, who was running for Treasurer of Illinois. He stole 1000 sheets of paper with campaign letterhead, printed fake campaign rally fliers promising ‘free beer, free food, girls and a good time for nothing’, and distributed them at rock concerts and homeless shelters, with the effect of disrupting Dixon’s rally.”

*Rove’s campaign for national chairman of the College Republicans was run by none other than the infamous Lee Atwater, of the infamous “Southern strategy”.  In 1981, Atwater explained this strategy, saying, “‘We want to cut this,’ is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than ‘Nigger, nigger.'”

*”Rove was fired from the 1992 Bush presidential campaign after he planted a negative story with columnist Robert Novak about dissatisfaction with campaign fundraising chief Robert Mosbacher Jr. ”

*”Rove has been accused of using the push poll technique to call voters to ask such things as whether people would be “more or less likely to vote for Governor Richards if [they] knew her staff is dominated by lesbians.”

*And, of course, there’s the Valerie Plame scandal. In 2005, “it was revealed that Rove was Novak’s second Bush administration source” for outing a covert CIA officer.

In other words, there should be lots to talk about if you decide to attend this dinner. Bon appetit! 🙂

P.S. Don’t miss today’s Washington Post story on Fred Malek’s background as a “Jew counter” for Richard Nixon.

UPDATE: Wow, check this audio out.

One By One GOP Candidates Are Exposed for the Liars They Are

0



By noting the following, I do not condone the lie-du-jour that consumes media “reporting” these past couple weeks.  CT Dem Richard Blumenthal deserves whatever criticism he gets.  But note how differently the press treats the extant crop of Repgs.  They lie with impunity.  Were there to be a real accounting, more of this information would be widely available.  It isn’t. Here’s just a sampling.  More later…

US Rep Mark Kirk

Not only has Congressman Kirk misrepresented his military service, his lies have been frequent, ongoing and huge. Take a look.

Rick Scott

Rick Scott is a candidate for FL governor AND a recent insurance industry lobbyist.  He also founded the astroturf “Conservatives for Patients’ Rights,” an oxymoron if ever there were one. His deceptions about the health care reform bill continue with retreads of his previous lies on behalf of the industry.  Now he wants a lock on the governorship (and possibly beyond).  A lobbyist governor, or worse?  Just say no to an astro-turfer (and transporter of teabaggers to rallies) as Governor! Take a look at the video about Scott below the fold.  You won’t want to forget his history as former CEO of giant hospital chain (founded by  former Majority Leader Bill Frist’s family) HCA, which under his “leadership,” paid 1.7 billion in civil and criminal penalties.  

Jan Brewer

Jan Brewer lies too.  Here’s Kos’s post on that.

Linda McMahon

Ms. Wrestling CEO is singularly unfit for any public office at all.  How this head of WWE (WWF) has demeaned America would take too long to explicate here. (But I will do a longer post on her before long.)  She wants to be the next Senator from CT.  Her “experience” may be why Blumental is still besting her in the polls.  And she too has lied to the people of CT about her qualifications.  When she gained an appointment for the State School Board of Education, she lied, claiming she had a degree in Education.  She did not. Check it out here. Linda McMahon, she’ll do for CT and the nation what she did for American television viewers.  As I said previously, we have learned that a wrestler (MN) and a body builder (CA) were pitiful governors.  Mere celebrity doesn’t translate into competent governance.  Nor does running just any business.

PS For years now Media Matters has taken the media to task. Now it widens its reach to fact-checking politicians at its new site. Thanks to them we now have a new source to debunk the sanctimony and deception of Repugs running for office.